After the First Crusade: The History of the Early Crusader States: kzbin.info/www/bejne/goeYk5Wfh7-JosU
@jacklaurentius613023 күн бұрын
The only channel defending the truth about the crusaders on KZbin.
@0NoOne1nParticular21 күн бұрын
this channel is probably one of the best for sure, Raymond Ibrahim on youtube has good ones as well, one about Saladin not being 100% as peaceful & charming as made out to be
@jacklaurentius613018 күн бұрын
@@ijumpjudyy ☪️ ancer
@nickmat99425 күн бұрын
Thank you for shedding light on the forgotten history of the exiled Armenians after the capture and murder of last Armenian king, Gagik II. France was pivotal in our survival not just during the crusades, but also during the Armenian genocide of 1915. Anatolia and the surrounding areas remains a brutal and beautiful place sought after by many. My prayers to gracious Syrians who still suffer and endure till this day.
@Poland80525 күн бұрын
As a follower of your channel for years and Maronite- I have been waiting for this video for a while. The question of the exact interactions between my ancestors and the Crusaders has long eluded me. Great to see some rmor granular history here. More of this, please. Godspeed!
@Poland80518 күн бұрын
@@ijumpjudyy Reclaimers*
@Poland80518 күн бұрын
@@ijumpjudyy @ijumpjudyy Haha, I do find these comments entertaining- thank you. If you mean to inflame, you're going to have to be a little less absurd. It's a plain historical fact that the Levant was Christian before the 7the century. St. Maron- the Patron of our Church was witnessing on Mt. Lebanon and the surrounding region two full centuries before the arrival of the Muhammadans.
@hopeundertheblacksun24 күн бұрын
Most crusades helped eastern christians. The first crusade helped the Byzantines take back many important cities from the Seljuks. But the fourth crusade is a major stain on the crusaders' legacy. I am aware that the pope did not support the sacking of Constantinople but its just a very tragic incident that should never have happened
@TheExtremeIRON23 күн бұрын
The Pope didn't condone it but he also made no effort to return any of the goods and relics stolen from Constantinople and given to Rome. The stolen relics of St Andrew, the founder of the Church in Constantinople, have never been returned. (Though they did return his skull in the 1960, which curiously was the only relic of his they didn't steal and was brought to Rome by clergy fleeing Patras)
@jacklaurentius613023 күн бұрын
@@TheExtremeIRONyes we totally want to leave these things alone in Constantinople which was on a downward spiral since manzikert. I’m glad it was saved from the Turks.
@TheExtremeIRON22 күн бұрын
@@jacklaurentius6130 It was already saved from the Turks, albeit by oathbreakers with no common decency. The fourth crusade did nothing but hurt people and steal things, it protected nothing
@Wisebury22 күн бұрын
@@TheExtremeIRON they are being kept safe in a Holy Christian City
@groundzero570822 күн бұрын
@@TheExtremeIRON lol the so called eastern romans could have either at the end could have been gave it slavs maybe .bcz they couldn't fight against the turks in the end
@bioliv121 күн бұрын
I just found your channel and your perspectives are a revelation! Look forward to delve deeper into your work in the days to come🙂
@Jeem19625 күн бұрын
Just leaving a comment here now that the live stream ended: the Byzantines had alienated the Syriac Jacobites and Maronites, as well as the Armenians. The Latins, despite being callously slandered as nothing but superstitious barbarians, were actually more embracing of these Christians regardless of their theological disagreements. The Maronites of Jebal Libnan, so impressed by the Latin effort and courage, were convinced to convert entirely to Catholicism. The pragmatic Latin method of befriending Eastern Christians first, and catechizing later, proved to be more effective than the Byzantine method of demanding theological unity at the cost of all else.
@TyranyFighterPatriot24 күн бұрын
It's a similar outcome with the Melkites. We keep our traditions, rituals, Liturgical authority and culture, but unite ourselves theologically to Rome as in the days of old.
@_EDIT_324 күн бұрын
And we can still see the latin in the maronite Christians of jebal libnan, or Lebanon to this day. I'm from lebanon but I am a melkite Catholic who literally feels more home in the latin Church, because it just feels like the fullness of the truth even if so many bad things are happening to it. Either way Christ gave us a promise, "the gates of hades will not overcome it (The Church)" whatever happens it is the truth†, may GOD bless you brother†
@theguyver493424 күн бұрын
One question aren't you ever scared that Christianity will die or will be replaced or that islam will take over
@hgkghkhgkgh837824 күн бұрын
And God has punished Byzantines. I wish Americans stopped worshipping those losers.
@MtiuliBichi23 күн бұрын
You befriended them so much that they didn’t helped you during the crusades
@BigIron148825 күн бұрын
Best Channel on KZbin!!!
@DanielAluni-v2t25 күн бұрын
It is definitely one of the most factual accurate and fair handed. That alone makes it stand apart. One of the few channels I actually subscribed to.
@F3cku-r4t25 күн бұрын
Agreed ‼️
@denysrodionov515123 күн бұрын
You're right!
@kaiser-of-history24 күн бұрын
I have always been fascinated by the Turcopoles, but I did not know that they often made up half of the Crusader Calvery.
@leonardoferreira145624 күн бұрын
Man, I'm really happy when I see that excellent videos like this have been translated into Portuguese. Hugs from Brazil, and keep up your videos with Portuguese dubbing.
@denysrodionov515123 күн бұрын
The video is top notch as always. Thank you very much for your work!
@DaFroBroforeal24 күн бұрын
Fascinating to see how the blended crusader states operated. 😯
@emilianohermosilla399624 күн бұрын
I thank you so much for your channel! It's crazy how so many stereotypes are taught when one is young and in school. I've basically been relearning and contextualizing everything I've learned so briefly and superficially there. To built up those layers of knowledge hehe 😉😁
@TheExtremeIRON23 күн бұрын
Just keep in mind that the anti-orthodox sentiments in this video make use of stereotypes as egregious as what you've heard in school
@emilianohermosilla399623 күн бұрын
@TheExtremeIRON such as? Gotta keep it in mind, thank you so much 😉
@groundzero570822 күн бұрын
@@TheExtremeIRON what anti orthodox ,can you put time stamps
@jessiemeisenheimer867518 күн бұрын
@@TheExtremeIRONNo response yet?
@ZenMasterPhil22 күн бұрын
Excellent work 👏
@JRBDWD25 күн бұрын
Thanks for the video
@aramisone719825 күн бұрын
The sacking of Konstantinopel did not help.
@RealCrusadesHistory24 күн бұрын
It wasn't relevant to their relationship with most Eastern Christians, since most Eastern Christians viewed Byzantium as an enemy.
@Pepe-pq3om24 күн бұрын
@@RealCrusadesHistoryIn retrospect it was really relevant, as after the sacking the empire could never fully recover, and one could argue that if the eastern romans had not fallen, that foes such as the Ottomans or the mongols would had never spread so far into christan land
@Gigadoomer1324 күн бұрын
Yes living under the turks was so much better for them wasn't it?
@RealCrusadesHistory24 күн бұрын
@@Pepe-pq3om The only reason the Byzantine Empire didn't fall was because of the First Crusade, so the Crusades bought the Byzantines extra time. After the death of Basil II in 1025, the Byzantines proved totally incapable of halting the progress of the Muslim powers, so they were irrelevant to that question. If anything, the inability of the crusaders to fully subdue and incorporate Byzantium into the Latin world was the real problem in terms of halting the Turkish advance. Perhaps a truly Latin Empire could've pushed the Turks back, since it would've cooperated with the Crusader States. Clearly the Byzantines couldn't do it.
@MtiuliBichi23 күн бұрын
@@Gigadoomer13 No fourth crusade = No living under the Turks
@HistoriaenCeluloide22 күн бұрын
I hope you make a video about the Latin Empire🧐
@-RONNIE25 күн бұрын
Thank you as always for the video and information
@royaltyfree960725 күн бұрын
It would’ve helped more if the Byzantines weren’t so stubborn and arrogant. Just goes to show that they really were Roman to the core. The same attitudes that brought down the Western Empire are the same ones that toppled the Eastern Empire
@fetusdeletus5117Күн бұрын
Yeah that’s bullshit mate. The fourth crusade was a disaster which Christianity will never recover from. The gates of Europe are held open by the Turks who still control Constantinople. The Turks would never have conquered Constantinople had it not been for the venetians and their crusader lackeys. This may ironically be the death knell for the west, and it all goes back to the greed that corrupted the crusader movement.
@CzechsTeaNine25 күн бұрын
Crusader haters wouldn't like these masterpiece of a video❤
@F3cku-r4t25 күн бұрын
I truly appreciate this knowledge🙏
@MariaCKouto24 күн бұрын
Thanks for the video. Moved me to my ancestors. Շնորհակալություն:
@afleitan7725 күн бұрын
Great work thanks.
@patrickparsons237824 күн бұрын
The expeditions to liberate and then aid the Holy Land prevented the East Roman Empire from collapsing earlier. The main problem was the arrogance of the Cibstantinopolitan elites 'court and church) towards those they called Latins and Franks. They recognized their military prowess but viewed them as barbarians. The rather duplicitous conduct of the East Romans during the Crusades, especially their alliance with Saladin, made the Latins view them with increasing mistrust. The major consequence of the Crusades was the entanglement of the Latin West in the court politics in Constaninople, and the eastern Emperors' heavy dependence on western military support. The events of 1203-4 were due entirely to this dangerous symbiotic relationship and to dysfunctional nature of the Imperial family in Constaninople.
@LuizfTri9924 күн бұрын
Thank you for making this video available with translation, I'm Brazilian 🇧🇷 and I really enjoy following your content, watching it in my language makes it even more fun
@jeddkeech25921 күн бұрын
history is so fascinating
@nfmoddingdesigners8 күн бұрын
Muchas gracias por el vídeo
@smacksmack597625 күн бұрын
Mixed results
@michaelman95725 күн бұрын
Some of column A. Some of column B.
@laststand642025 күн бұрын
That's interesting. I had never really thought of the high density of Eastern Christians already in the Middle east when the Crusaders arrived.
@CVbNmkoduivs24 күн бұрын
مصر لم تصبح اكثرية مسلمه إلا بعد الحروب الصليبيه والشام كذالك اصحبت الاقليات في الشرق الأوسط منبوذه بعكس قبل الصليبين بكل تاكيد
@MuddieRain25 күн бұрын
Hurt
@Noamchomsky191725 күн бұрын
No
@groundzero570821 күн бұрын
Great🎉
@stephenh948320 күн бұрын
love them music so much
@rodelacusar9925 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@asadalmahrezi969523 күн бұрын
I did a DNA test which showed Cilician Armenian Ancestry and traced my family name to understand the history behind it. As per the Arab references, the Mamluks destroyed the last Crusaders Kingdom of Cilicia and took its people to Syria as war prisoners. The Maronites were punished for their collaboration with the Crusaders and many got deported to Cyprus. Those who remained were deported to Bierut. So the Crusaders actually caused suffering to our people of which some have lost their land, culture and some lost their full identity.
@TheExtremeIRON23 күн бұрын
Ya papists will bend over backwards to pretend like the crusaders never did anything wrong or worsened peoples lives in any way
@groundzero570823 күн бұрын
if the crusaders didnt came .samething gonna happen anyway
@rickyyacine481824 күн бұрын
1 thing is clear the 4th crusade damaged the crusaders image for good
@RealCrusadesHistory23 күн бұрын
Not at all.
@TheExtremeIRON23 күн бұрын
@@RealCrusadesHistorysomeone's in denial
@johnnotrealname816822 күн бұрын
@@RealCrusadesHistoryReally?
@tobiasgriffin25 күн бұрын
Can you do one on nubia christian
@JacobWalsh-d1e25 күн бұрын
Watching this later😁
@CARL_09325 күн бұрын
The Crusades significantly strained relations between the Latin and Eastern Orthodox churches, leading to increased hostility and mistrust. The Crusades, a series of religious wars between the 11th and 15th centuries, had a profound impact on the relationship between the Latin (Western) and Eastern Orthodox churches.
@moonman922725 күн бұрын
chatGPT generated comment
@groundzero570821 күн бұрын
Byzantophiles were that great when it comes to battles
@shroudturin14 күн бұрын
it's really weird, why do I hear AI in foreign language??
@koksalceylan903211 күн бұрын
If not whit the help of Turkopoles the Armenian,Byzine Greek, Romans Christians wood never have survived to this day!.
@nikicastanić19 күн бұрын
Some were baptism before church schism!
@luisfernandoramirezhermosa490923 күн бұрын
como no tener favoritismo hacia los Bizantinos que simplemente hacian todo mejor, los occidentales europeos se beneficiaron siempre de su desgracia o de sus momentos de apogeo en los que frenaba al Islam y lo peleaba de igual a igual a lo largo de siglos mucho antes de que aparezcan los cruzados; mientras Europa estaba sumergida en la antiguedad e ignorancia y, el Imperio Bizantino y las entidades islamicas de medio oriente estaban decadas adelantadas con sus instituciones, ciencia, preservacion de textos antiguos, ingenieria naval y belica, culturalmente y tecnologicamente muy superiores.
@luisfernandoramirezhermosa490923 күн бұрын
ni siquiera hace falta hablar de la Cuarta Cruzada, ese es el mayor simbolo de cobardia y traicion del Cristianismo Occidental Europeo historicamente hipocrita
@groundzero570822 күн бұрын
they really were superior ,that how small army of western knights started forming crusader states in levant lmao.
@groundzero570822 күн бұрын
the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic entities of the Middle East were decades ahead,for sure but it will not be case in the future buddy
@rafaelguimaraes6422 күн бұрын
absolutely false, it was the West that was the apogee in the Middle Ages of scholastic development and the emergence of universities and the scientific method.
@stephanusghibellino16 күн бұрын
Puros lugares comunes ya refutados por autores como Rodney Stark.
@calvanoni544325 күн бұрын
I bet if the dna is tested tiday they would find that mix still.
@GheorgheVasile-p1q22 күн бұрын
Both Hurt and Help 🤔🤔
@rogersmith838622 күн бұрын
Depends on which Crusade is under consideration!
@CVbNmkoduivs24 күн бұрын
1- سقطت الموصل سنة 1262 بيد المغول بسبب نصارى الموصل 2- اللي كان يدل الحمله الصليبيه السابعه 1250م نصراني قبطي 3- فرح نصارى دمشق بسقوط دمشق بيد المغول سنة 1260م و القائد المغولي النصراني كتبغا وحيثوم الأرمني وبوهيميند الحاكم الصليبي لأنطاكيا وطرابلس 4- نصارى لبنان الموارنه كان يقطعون طرق التجارة والحج من دمشق إلى مكة وكانوا متحالفين مع الصليبين ويبيعون ابناء ونساء المسلمين لقبرص وأرمينيا فالظاهر بيبرس عمل فيهم مجازر رهيب في عهده في لبنان وكان بسبب هاذي العوامل بيبرس والمماليك وعوام المسلمين شديدين الحقد على النصارى عامة أدت الحروب الصليبيه بلا شك إلى تغيير التركيبة السكانية في كلاً من مصر والشام لصالح المسلمين بعد ان كانت اقليه مسلمه تحكم اكثرية مسيحية منذ القرن السابع
@groundzero570822 күн бұрын
lol if you read why latins started crusading that will give different perspective
@groundzero570822 күн бұрын
muslims have already started doing those things to christians even before crusaders .
@groundzero570822 күн бұрын
specailly spain and near france borders ,where hordes come and loot and burn christian villages
@johnrooney50721 күн бұрын
After hundreds of years of Islamic conquest extending even into the heart of Europe something had to be done.