The Top Secret Nazi Weapons That Could Have Won The War

[@paulforder591]

The Germans were years ahead of their time developing advanced missiles and jets in WW2, but had a scarcity of resources and manpower, and, in addition, the Nazi bureaucracy failed to prioritize these 'Wonder weapons'. An excellent in-depth documentary.

[@williamtell5365]

It's a myth that Germany was somehow "ahead" technologically. In some areas, yes. In many areas, they were behind.

[@RJ6AV6]

​​@@williamtell5365not a myth Germany was the leader in engineering and tooling throughout the 19th and early 20th century. England was right with them too but they were too small a country and Germany knew that. Britain had to rely on the US to stand with them against Germany

[@williamtell5365]

@@RJ6AV6 Germany was not the leader. Germany was a leader. On par with several countries, including UK, France, US, etc. That is in terms of engineering. In terms of industrial output, Germany lagged far behind the US and even USSR, as it had not successfully learned leading industrial production and distribution methods. All you need to do is compare tank output from USSR and US versus Germany to see how badly the Germans failed in this respect. Rocketry was one area where the Germans were indeed ahead technologically but they lagged badly in atomics, radar and sonar, tool and dye design in factories, applied mathematics and information technology (surveillance), explosives design, and many other areas. So uh, ... Nah.

[@RJ6AV6]

Basically what I said lol but you just HAVE to be right huh? There was simply no way Germany would have taken over the world because of the lack of population compared to the US, Russia, etc. Shout out to Russia for suffering the most casualties and winning WW2 for the world though!

[@qzwxecrv0192837465]

I used to enjoy these types of documentaries 20 years ago. There is so much fluff in these pieces that it just drags on. This isn’t the only channel to do so.

[@JohnSmith-pj6wb]

its new age wokism and neo revisionism...its rampant in western academia and really distorting what was and the truth of the past all to fit a contemporary leftist narrative solely aimed to harass and harm conservatives....we would do well to learn how to discern between this and what is actually accurate...weird times we live in as in the past truth and fact ruled but now its dei qoutas and political narratives to gain power...be damned the truth and accurate history to these people

[@PrinceyDaC0DER]

"back in our days blah blah blah" ahh geezer 🤓

[@DanH-u3f]

There was nothing they could have done to win the war. They ran out of fuel and pilots.

[@citizenVader]

I came here to write something near to your statement

[@TyreaLSC]

Not invading Russia probably would've won the war

[@jeffwarshaw6838]

I talked to a Luftwaffe ace who said that in 1945 he went to an airfield and was told: “You can take any plane you want, but you can’t fly them. There’s no fuel.” That says it all.

[@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg]

Wonder Waffen!

[@admiralyisoonshin4995]

Yes.

[@LDNRDR]

In 1941, America was calling for peace with Hitler. America vetoed the call to help with 92% against joining the war - only joining once attacked itself.

[@Rob774]

What's your point? It wasn't our war.

[@brianwhitford6086]

@@Rob774 Until we were attacked at Pearl Harbor by the Japanese on Dec. 7th of that year. We would not attack unless attacked. Hitler didn't want the Americans to get involved until he said so and told Japan just that. But as it turns out Japan at the time was NOT one to hold punches. I just can't remember if it was Hideki Dojo who ordered the attack or another Japanese officer because I know the Emperor wasn't on board with the idea.

[@backwardflag]

In other news, the sky is above the ground.

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

The common explanation is that each V-2 did more damage to the German economy than it did to the British or the Dutch. Their damage to Antwerp was horrendous, but their toll on England -- roughly one civilian, usually a noncombatant woman or child, for a ton of explosive, a couple of tons of fuel, and the price of a house in metalwork -- was militarily worthless.

[@John.Flower.Productions]

Russia had amassed the largest army that the world will ever know, while America had been at full-scale production for years without deploying a single division. The international bankers/communists had the war that they planned/started won, before needlessly killing tens of millions of Europeans.

[@jerrywatt6813]

Yes the Russians were surch Great solders they only lost 20 million men most didn't have guns you just picked up a dead guys weapon until you got killed twenty minutes later and everything of value came from the usa or hitler would have destroyed Russia while stalin hid and had a nervous break down !!😊

[@mediocrehat]

Ah yes, the age old allies, bankers and communists. I guess it makes sense if you know nothing about banking, nothing about communism, or nothing about anything.

[@John.Flower.Productions]

@@mediocrehat Well mediocrehat (presumably on your father's side), they are bastard offspring of the same parents. My comment was very concise, allowing for anyone to dispute one or more of the facts therein.

[@John.Flower.Productions]

@@mediocrehat My comment was very concise, allowing for anyone to dispute one or more of the facts therein.

[@pieterveenders9793]

Bankers, communists, pornographers, they're all the same tribe. And the Germans were the vanguard against it. Even George Patton himself admitted after the war what a grave mistake it was that they fought the Nazis instead of the Communists. We can see clearly today why.

[@rileywilliams9799]

"A Nazi salute from the Statue of Liberty.' Still makes my stomach cramp.

[@lewdecker1442]

This was made long before there were nazi's.

[@eottoe2001]

They did not have the industrial capacity, skilled labor, and resources to make it happen unlike the UK, US, and Canada which did.

[@paulneedham9885]

But they had the scientists who were quickly whisked of to the US at the end of ww2 in Europe. Hypocrites

[@AdamGeorgeSanders]

Only US had more serious industry than Germany. The UK have a much weaker/smaller industrial base, and with relatively backward technology.

[@eottoe2001]

@@AdamGeorgeSanders Yes, that's true. I can't remember who made the case but our ability to make a nuclear bomb was predicated by labor, resources, and things like the TVA. The UK was ahead of us in technological know-how through things like RADAR and airplane engine technology.

[@xuser48]

The american Flying wings shown wasn't based on german designs. Jack Northrop had the idea even before the war started and he worked on a long distance flying wing bomber that could reach Germany from mainland USA.

[@lewdecker1442]

That flying wing made by the Horten bros in germany.

[@pashby3]

jack northrop flying wing prototypes, built at a time when americans where reluctant to enter a european war.

[@tempestfury8324]

I've been a student of WWII for over 45 years now. Although there is some truth to Germany's technology, the premise of this video is simply ridiculous.

[@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg]

Where are the Grey's?

[@spaceghost2455]

44:34

[@lolmao500]

No single weapon can win a war, logistics win wars.

[@Gokizzmass]

Hitler would not allow any "Jew Science" so no atom bomb.

[@exterminateparasites3185]

You received 45 years of Disinformation and indoctrination,hope it was worth it.

[@retroholic5628]

I love the narrator! Same guy who narrates A Haunting (one of my favorite shows)!

[@austinballard3818]

Yessssss

[@alldog222]

I was just goona say, I think I have seen this at least 3 times, but years later I hit it, and the Narrartor locks me in.

[@ronnie7100]

Yoo that was my first thought

[@backwardflag]

​@@ronnie7100 I wouldn't be surprised if that was absolutely true.

[@brettcurtis5710]

The Nazis whole war effort was based on competition, between companies and designers - they did not have the industrial capacity - nor the oil - to compete with the US and the British Empire! As one German tank ace once commented - we had the Tiger, good enough to beat 12 Shermans - but the Yanks always had 13 Shermans! Same with the Japanese, they put one aircraft carrier in the fleet from 1940, the US put 126!!!

[@patmeyer3376]

The odd heavy winter weather decided the outcome

[@gunnerbhb50]

If Hitler had waited 3-4 years before starting his campaign, say 1943-44 it may have been a whole different story and if he had left Russia alone again different story, but I'm pretty sure most people are glad he didn't

[@AllKnowingOne88]

Russians was about to get ready to invade, it was now or never.. someone didnt want germany to wield power and influence twice.

[@voivode2591]

People forget. Most late WWII aircraft for example were actually designed in the beginning or just before the war started. It took years to bring most of them into a meaningful production or performance. Germany did not have the resources or production capabilities to finish what they designed. Also they were not the only ones who could design advanced weapons.

[@pashby3]

Heinkel 162A-2 Salamander. It only took 3 months from drawing board to prototype. HE162 was the first single engine jet fighter fitted with an ejection seat - Still, according to British test-pilot Eric Brown, it could "run rings around a Meteor & / faster than a 262 at height

[@danielmolinar8669]

@@pashby3”3 months” and it looked and played the part. The fact that it FLEW is very impressive, I’ll give them that.

[@frederickrohrbacher8606]

My personal favorite is The ME 262!

[@tempestfury8324]

@@frederickrohrbacher8606 : The real winner of aerial combat was decisively the Mustang in WWII. Sure the 262 was a phenomenal feat but severely lacking in many ways. Spool up for takeoff, a very low landing speed, and the incredibly high maintenance and failure rate of the Jumo 004 and BMW engines. It might be your favorite but it certainly wasn't the best.

[@jeffalan6339]

I wonder why the V1 was not used on Moscow, the rockets could have killed Stalin his staff changed the eastern front

[@ALGYeAhBoY]

Gonna watch as I know one gen will think everything is 100% wrong and still think it’s right

[@johntakolander8613]

I`m troubled: For whom did the Norwegians build their heavy water equipment in Vemork Norway? It was an expensive installation!

[@derekdreke4990]

I have actually been extremely interested in this and there is another video that explains it a bit more. From what I understand there was a factory or some sort of dam that I believe they where making it at. Now there is a huge lake and apparently there was a boat with tons of heavy water that was sunk and maybe possibly still there 🤔 probably not a lot of info as it is very very highly sought after. I'm sure the tanks it was in would have been corroded by now or recovered at this point which is probably what has really happened. Hard to say lots of grey areas about this and not much info as so much was going on at this time. I feel they where trying to hide shit as well as leaving the country and fine sanctuarys where the head guys would be safe.

[@grapesoder1301]

Real ass history

[@model101t800]

They had insane development in many areas, where many were the basis for modern weapons and platforms, but fortunately it was far too late, stuck between two fronts, you can throw anything at it, but you're not going to win.

[@sandordombi7262]

Jet - engine... first invent.... Oh, no..... That was Britain..... In 1928, RAF College Cranwell cadet [10] Frank Whittle formally submitted his ideas for a turbo-jet to his superiors. In October 1929, he developed his ideas further.[11] On 16 January 1930 in England, Whittle submitted his first patent (granted in 1932).

[@John.Flower.Productions]

I just invented a time travelling machine (2024). Now, all I have to do is wait until someone creates one.

[@aaronmcconnell7358]

I wonder if Whittle got his idea from Henry Coanda's 1910 "turbo propulsar"

[@SlapShotTakes]

Patents require a specific and achievable way for something to function. And Whittle also did the first bench test and built the first working jet.

[@GoldenGateNum9]

Yeah maybe but was it fully operational yet?, German Messerschmitt was.

[@anthonycurr3161]

One of the "great" train robbers was a Werner von Braun lookalike

[@markf19]

Hehe I like when they were talking about the Amerika bomber, the guy was standing in front of a B36 Peacemaker, which flew in 1946 and could go from the east coast to Berlin and back. Murica

[@danielmolinar8669]

There was also the making of the YB-35 flying wing at the time, which was also specifically designed for that trip

[@cliffterrell4876]

Oppenheimer was able to build the A bomb for us because he was directly involved in the German A bomb technology and knowledge until he defected to the United States just before the war.

[@gonzalesfrederic6213]

And after 1,000 years, what !?

[@unclefart5527]

Must be bad. Nothing in the teasers could have been built in quantity. Hit bait.

[@radav49]

Who is the Morn blurring out segments of the videos< stop it there is no need to blur them out

[@erickort1987]

hitler had submarine factories out of range from us and there allies

[@derekdreke4990]

That shit was huge as well but once they cracked the inigma machine it was over for them. Although they did do a ton of damage

[@w41duvernay]

Yeah, that V2 rockets were driving Britian crazy. Even affected the VE plans as well, which drove Patton crazy because he couldn't keep driving towards Germany. They just couldn't figure how to develop the Amerikka bomber, so they could attack the US.

[@imwithname843]

Not 1000 years, but forever.

[@tybo103]

Nazi?

[@Mikemonoa-hz2rz]

The problem was hitler was over thinking to much during the war that he fell into a deep depression and anxiety which lead to drugs then death

[@nexx456]

No way US gone to the moon without German engineers. 125 best engineers from Von Braun's group came to US. Russian rocket program was 100% home grown.

[@Richard-iv4zm]

That's simply not true, just like the US, Russia also took many German scientists and technology.

[@danielmolinar8669]

Untrue. If so, why did the soviets lose? They not only had more Germans and V-2s, but they had Sergei Korolev. Also, Von Braun admitted that his designs were directly inspired by Goddard’s works, who made the liquid fueled rocket decades prior. Even saying had the US supported him more, they wouldn’t need him at all.

[@paulneedham9885]

The US never experienced ww2 on home soil. The UK did with the blitz followed later with the V1 and V2 bombs. They never surrendered fortunately, if they had there would have been no d day and quite possibly a peace between the US and Germany

[@EnterpriseXI]

Why do people say that if Germanys wonder weapons (Me-262, V-1, V-2 ext) had been introduced earlier, the war might have ended differently? The truth is no matter what, Nazi Germany was going to lose the war regardless of any new weapons or technology, except the A-bomb. If they were able to develop one and drop it onto the US, that would have made a difference if the bomber got passed our defenses.

[@72markmiester]

They forgot to say that the Nazis also invented the first helicopter.

[@BrendonCoss-e5w]

I didn't know did the Germans have a working model because if it was on paper I thought it was Leonardo da Vinci that made the first helicopter on paper that is

[@72markmiester]

@ I don’t know about that. But I was watching a documentary of course on these super weapons they had invented. And toward the end of the video. There it was.

[@BrendonCoss-e5w]

@@72markmiester Leonardo da Vinci wrote down every idea that he had, heathens on paper made the first tank for the battlefield only on paper I should say, but if you Google Leonardo da Vinci and helicopter I think it'll show you a plan that he hadn't made for a working helicopter even if it didn't work he had the idea of a vertical take-off machine

[@PATRIOT-Canada]

This is so scary i started feeling sick to my stomach

[@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg]

How much acid were they taking?

[@jarihyytiainen5366]

first amphetamines too... acid was American think tank... after the war... 6o`s

[@Graham-mu1ul]

Lots 😂😂😂😂

[@tonyjohnson8752]

No way was von Braun a hero.

[@khairulnaeim756]

Question are speed of light can be compare with laser..

[@andreborowski4954]

You show the B29 bombers over Peenemünce?

[@PedroPerez-c6m]

Greed and over confidence that's why they lost

[@mikehawk6563]

Years ago when I watched tgis video on the Modern Marvels show it was just as good.

[@williamtell5365]

There is only one weapon that might have even given them a prayer of winning the war. Unfortunately for the Nazis, it was actually another country that was developing it. At least Germany was lucky enough not to have it dropped on them though.

[@DebbieStidham-fb8we]

@williamtell5365 they lost some of the critical scientists they needed by persecuting the jews,some of the scientists that were left in Germany had moral problems with giving a meglomaniac like Hitler a weapon with that kind of power.they had ballistic missles though,guided bombs,television.the Germans were quite advanced for the time.if adolph had waited 5 yrs. before starting his war,things would have been different indeed.thank god he didn't.

[@pieterveenders9793]

Germany is well known to have a nuclear program back then, as did the Japanese, and there is evidence that both also might have detonated one. You should do some more research.

[@danielmolinar8669]

@@pieterveenders9793You call THAT a nuclear program? Sure, a program to kick nuclear physics outta Germany for it being labeled a “Jewish” science. Thank Lenard for that

[@khairulnaeim756]

Water in earth but air at space probably...

[@andrewriegel6787]

What's the science?....Death

[@JosephBoxmeyer-u3d]

Germany was a society where official doctrine was verboten. Seems familiar. I am not sure that this comment will be posted.

[@danielmolinar8669]

“I am not sure that this comment will be posted.” Get ready for disappointment

[@khairulnaeim756]

About this laser thing...have different opinions...we probably try to use as communication after being put in development... because space have trouble with signal wave..it is late... second type was expand this laser ..make it wide ...for detect space rock...on the same line ...that rail gun.. probably they use different name ... probably rail space...

[@MrLescol]

they fluffed it with their old style thoughts,, it has to have a propeller! Great potential but..

[@mrchaudhary-1]

dogs gathered to kill a lion of that time

[@austinballard3818]

The two most likely things hitler couldve done different that likely couldve handed him the victory.. is one.. not invade the ussr.. atleast not until the other wars were won.. that way he wouldnt have so many different fronts.. two.. instead of inventing dozens of different experiemntal new weapons.. focus all the engineers and scientists all on one or two weapons.. and then mass produce those.. for example.. the v2 rocket.. or the jet they invented.. if they wouldve done both or one of these things differently.. the world may be very different today

[@mediocrehat]

Not really. They never had a viable means to deal with the UK. There was no true way to prevent the Royal Navy intervening against an attempted landing (the Sea Lion plan is ridiculously optimistic and even that was hopeless once the air battle was lost by fall 1940) and no way to build the kind of surface fleet required to challenge them. Basically, once Churchill refused to surrender, there was really nothing the Axis could do to force it any time in the immediate future. Since war with the USSR is quite literally a requirement of Nazi ideology (If you’re not smashing the Bolshevik menace and winning lebensraum for the German master race, what are you doing? Why are you here?), and the UK couldn’t be crushed in any practical way any time in the next several years, a two front was was inevitable. And of course, since Japan kinda has to bring the US into the war to fulfill their own insane ideology, and has to do so by late 1941 before the US begins to overtake them in naval strength (something the Japanese were anticipating and would have happened given American naval build up plans), you basically have a countdown that ends with the US having an atomic bomb in summer 1945, so if you don’t win by then, you’re done for. However, winning by then is impossible since victory requires building a surface fleet to defeat to Royal Navy and the US Atlantic Fleet, which would likely take over a decade if it was possible at all. The "best" outcomes for Germany in alternate history are that they play their cards better on the defensive in 1943 and 1944, thus holding out long enough to get nuked in August 1945. Since American nuclear production was slow, it might not be until 1946 that the USAAF turned the entire country into a radioactive wasteland. Neither the V2 nor the Me-262 were ever going to be war winners. Even if the Me-262 had worked well, the Allies already had jet fighter designs and even functional jet fighters and could have switched their massive industrial advantage to building those instead, leaving the jet fighter as, at best, a temporary advantage. The V-2 was exceptionally pointless, costing as much as an entire Pz IV per shot, and never accurate enough to do anything more than hit somewhere in a city-sized target. While an interesting rocketry exercise for Von Braun, who got to use Hitler’s vast supply of slave labor for his personal curiosity, it was not about to become a practical weapon for achieving any strategic or operational goal, and every attempt to use it as such failed utterly.

[@lolmao500]

V2 rockets were useless garbage.

[@utrecht101repsdd7]

​Uk was and is nothing back than compared to the Germans back then. They fled from the beach and they cried for help to america, and America and the rest of the world let staling losing more and more men. They waited many months do build a big army for the invasion and still it tooks almost a year to defeat and on Russia side 20 milion deads. And at beging of Barbarossa they could have won or make a deal with Stalin, only hitler decided to not take Moskou but Stalingrad etc and then came the cold etc. So that was stupid and although they cracked codes and knowing where the attacks came. Nazis they were well trained maybe if he was smarter than he to collaborate with stalin to invade uk, Ooh uk had indeed a very good navi, maybe with Italië but al that never happened and German language 😅 English sounds better .

[@danielmolinar8669]

Wow. “The nazis could’ve won if they weren’t Nazis.” Mindblowing

[@theworkshopmechanicchannel3296]

They were never going to win.

[@pieterveenders9793]

If they wouldn't have attacked the USSR they would have had their 1000 year Reich with ease. The USSR had the biggest military on earth and contributed over 50% to the defeat of the Nazi's, while the US only did 25% and the UK, Canada and others the remaining 25%.

[@danielmolinar8669]

@@pieterveenders9793Even if they “won”, they would still collapse without another war to base their economy on. The only way they would’ve won is by not starting shit, which would probably mean not being Nazis.

[@davidtan9680]

Hy, hy,.. Superb bird superb bird as fly onto higher and higher

[@davidfantaci3173]

STOP censoring the video, this has been on broadcast TV! So LAME!!! Thumbs down to you!

[@jesusgomez5833]

LinesInDirt… Rite???

[@smiragnusbrowne4867]

WHAT NONSENSE SENSATIONALIST NONSENSE

[@hulguiniiiadolfo]

Look like man on a high castle

[@khairulnaeim756]

Actually water have big flaws if use for fly...it heavy... probably works for ground level.. second how long... hmmm probably have to read it all rather than just hear....

[@DebbieStidham-fb8we]

Germany was many years ahead of Everyone,especially in jet aircraft,and rocketry.guided weapons etc.

[@devilman1976]

Execpt the first jet engine was built by a British guy...

[@Richard-iv4zm]

Ever heard of Frank Whittle ?

[@growlers90]

Wasn’t ahead in nuclear weapons though, No matter how many fantasy planes or tanks different designers who were all fighting to be the Nazi’s favourites came up with they were doomed!

[@TheScotsman1977]

And

[@kereckelizabeth3625]

The Germans were not that much ahead of the Brits on jet engine. yes, their jets were faster, more powerful but came at the expense of reliability. The British Gloster Meteor's engine was far more reliable. The Me 262's engines had to be replaced after less than a dozen flights, while the Meteor's engine lasted many times longer, almost 100 flights. Having to replace engines that often was simply wasting resources.

[@brealistic3542]

A lot of you just proved the old addage that Ignorance is Bliss. Now go watch some Honey BooBoo.😁

[@CT9905.]

Would have, could have and did not!!!

[@RittervonEpp1868]

CENSORED!

[@petesteirer]

Hitler flew to New York escorted by "supersonic jets". Uh, hello.

[@jasonsmith1143]

NO star war copy German WW2 fighter

[@reginaldmcnab3265]

34:00 - 34:11 well these are the same victors who Germany declared war on neutral America. Even though America had ordered the American navy to hunt and destroy German U-boat well before Germany declared war, Also lets not forget that the victors has a long history of invading and attacking other countries then and now. Like they say, never forget

[@ThisIsSparta300]

Dude prob coulda fought another 20 uears on USSR fuel if he didnt attack them, no?

[@KrmSeef-r9k]

Banzr❤

[@davidtan9680]

Could it's due tempt

[@sandordombi7262]

Haette haette Fahrradkette.... If you would know German, that would be the NEXT inspiration... Or: LEONARDO DA VINCI - Lord of the WORLD... (Because, also He had.... PLANS.... But NOT REAL weapons....)... I think, one can have even more better videos...

[@khairulnaeim756]

If that method put in space.. Wonder what happen... because we needs speed...to reach other side ...so.. magnetic rotation... probably this method...and theory about electric blow up thing...and other people opinion 🤖... fuel is rejected also nuke energy...

[@NathanSalapokni]

I know and i very much apologize peace out

[@khairulnaeim756]

Probably for spy or hijacked communication... probably...it looks not have gun or something.....it that time sky not guard very well...

[@williamglaser6577]

Ubsubscribing, this is fake crap, not " Real History " .

[@tybo103]

Seems to glorify the nazis a bit much

[@smiragnusbrowne4867]

UNSUBSCRIBED

[@thatguyinthecomments4119]

NOBODY CARES!

[@MagnumOpusSRT]

SUBSCRIBED

[@GoldenGateNum9]

🛸🛸🛸 22:15 wow man, how on earth did these gifted genius's lose the war!.. this is most def at Area 51! 👌 🛸🛸🛸

[@ricerob]

Man, is this video full of historical errors?

[@YouTube_user3333]

Publishing World War Two American propaganda in 2024? That’s one way too lose subscribers 😂 I lost count of how many fallacies there were in this video. It’s more satire than facts 🤣

[@aleksandra1383]

GERMAN wepon

[@donnadoriggins5236]

😂😂😂😂 this is literally a History channel episode from shyt late 90s early 2000s why isnt the logo in the bottom corner? ??? So many channles are just horriably misinformed A.I. voiced shoddy vids & then the other half is channels regurgitating old network t.v. shows repackaged as something new created.

[@clecio-mx4mo]

why these documentairy have to have so much freaking boring loud soundtrack! thumbs down!

[@wellitsjustG]

YO! The music kills the content, no thanks

[@mikegee3768]

Uznam-Wolin-Szczecin

[@VikingTeddy]

Haven't watched this yet, but I already know it's going to be full of misinformation. Edit: Yeah. I only got a few seconds in, I'm done. Stealth bomber? The Horten 229? Do yourself a favor and give this channel a wide berth.

[@frankknudsen842]

😅 👍

[@brealistic3542]

The Horton 229 was tested by NASA as a stealth bomber. It really didn't even have to be considering its impressive speed and maneuverability. The Germans had many impressive weapons in the pipe line. Sorry that hurts your fragile ego but it's the absolute truth. Better you not watch this show, you might get your feelings hurt. 😆

[@brealistic3542]

You better not watch it either.😉

[@frankknudsen842]

@brealistic3542 I always catch an ear full for weeks sometimes for my elaborations . For me, there are two main topics regarding WW2 Germany. The strategic war, and the idealistic war. The two are almost separately beyond land occupation. Anything beyond those two, especially if it's other worldly, is almost irrelevant. Thanks ever much

[@VikingTeddy]

@@brealistic3542 That's exactly why I'm not watching. It really does hurt my feelings a bit that these myths are still being propagated. NASA has never touched the Horten, and why would they? At that point it was ancient news. The testing was done by Northrop, but it didn't yield anything new that other flying wings from the past 20 years hadn't already discovered. It's one of those pervasive tales that have been debunked decades ago, along with "the invincible Tiger", or "blitzkrieg on meth" and a dozen other myths. But you don't have to take my word for it. If you ever get interested in the details it's all one search away. When you develop an interest in history you'll be surprised at the amount of misinformation in popular media, enough to get your feelings hurt.

[@mikkelolsen257]

what the fuck is it with that music in the back ,f hate it im gone

[@jason22spurs]

Could never have won the war!!!