Red Army SU-100 Tank Destroyer (WW2)

[@RollingThunderModels]

Thx for making the video! Love these machines! This kind of music fits very well!

[@maciektrzaska6637]

Po prostu super materiał👍

[@allgood6760]

What a beast!

[@Oczkins92]

That was really challenger for german tanks.

[@alexandros1948]

This was one of the few Soviet tanks which actually had the whole package. It was also feared by the German heavies during WW2.

[@Anciety69yearsago]

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuu

[@akken2112]

The one major thing missing from its "package" was a machine gun to protect itself from infantry carrying Panzerfausts or Panzerschrecks.

[@karimmoop9560]

@@akken2112 russian doctrine had the vehicles be a few hundred meters away from the front; if it was upclose & personal something went wrong

[@ahmetfayzi6457]

@@karimmoop9560

[@wifi_soldier5076]

Thats often what the tank riders were for. Ive read a book from a commander of an SU-85. they almost always had tank riders with them. They also would also have a machine they could use if needed. ​@akken2112

[@spaman7716]

It always amazes and mildly amuses me at how comically long the gun is

[@SMGJohn]

It sure did not amuse the Germans though

[@abraham65061]

This tank looks like an elephant 🐘

[@thomasschon718]

Nice Music👍🏼

[@БубликПомидорович]

It is definitely soviet jagdpanther!

[@justforever96]

More like the Jagdpanther is a German SU-100. The 100 is directly based on the 85 which is just an Su-122 assault gun with an AT gun swapped in. And the SU-122 came out well before the Jagdpanther did.

[@ИгорьДобрынин-ч3р]

Ребята,тут,в ролике,мелькают самоходки с тактическими номерами:Е-476,Е-457..и т.д.Может,кто знает,что за часть?

[@isaaccampbell2884]

I was wondering what units those numbers belonged too

[@markjenner7199]

Why doesn't this tank get mentioned when talking about world war two instead of t 34 all the time don't get me wrong the t 34 was good on its day but Russia had other tanks just as important such as the s u 100 tank .

[@nickellison2785]

I wouldn’t say this was as important as the T-34, but still definitely not bought up often enough

[@Venezolano410]

It's not a tank. It's a tank destroyer.

[@noorsheda1549]

​@@Venezolano410still a tank

[@ahmetfayzi6457]

Because it was not produced in tens of thousands like the T-34.

[@justforever96]

​@@noorsheda1549no it is not. A tank destroyer has one job, to kill tanks, usually from ambush, they are mobile anti-tank guns. They cannot do what tanks do, they are used for defensive warfare, while tanks are useful for offensive warfare. They have no machine guns, no turrets. Tanks have many jobs besides just killing other tanks, they don't make thousands of tanks on each side just so they can blow them up and see who can kill more of them. A TD is definitely not a tank, which is why they came up with a new name for them and called them _tank destroyers_ . Just because they have tracks and guns doesn't make them all tanks. Just like we have cruisers, destroyers, battleships. All vessels with guns. Maybe they even look kind of similar to laymen, but there is a definite difference between a cruiser and a destroyer. Different roles, different construction.

[@amazonlordspartainamazonkn4820]

Nothing better than pz iv d

[@methcooker6402]

If you choose that over this you’re definitely a wehraboo💀

[@lincewick8590]

Z

[@Vsrataviamotoengeneering]

Никаких Z! Те люди что на хронике не видели разницы между русскими и украинцами и не вели братоубийстенную войну!

[@ghoppolty5752]

​@@Vsrataviamotoengeneering Чё в натуре не видели?! Точно, точно? А как же УПА, ОУН и пр.? Точно не видели или кто-то здесь ...ит?

[@Vsrataviamotoengeneering]

@@ghoppolty5752 А извините те сами украинский народ открыто терроризировали, да и хочу напомнить что среди РУССКИХ тоже не мало ублюдков и выблядков находилось, РОА не даст соврать, нацизм не имеет национальности он имеет лишь один источник- он рождается лишь из нежелания признавать насилие к другим народам недопустимым!!!