No way the steel production can go green? No way, because megawatts are needed to power the production of steel, or if, the steel plant is situated next to a hydro power plant. Which is only for the case of a Canadian aluminium production plant, which uses power from the hydro dam.
@nirmalmadhavan26972 жыл бұрын
Can i use some parts of this video for my presentation?
@mpisusmat2 жыл бұрын
Dear Nirmal, thanks for your interest. Yes, you can but please state the "Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH" as copyright and insert the link to this video. Good luck for your presentation :)
@nirmalmadhavan26972 жыл бұрын
@@mpisusmat Thank you so much 🙏🙏
@kimlibera663 Жыл бұрын
H2O vapor is the more potent greenhouse gas.
@luag_a11 ай бұрын
This statement is wrong. Although water vapor is a greenhouse gas, CO2 is a significantly more potent greenhouse gas. Replacing CO2 with water vapor is therefore a very good idea.
@kimlibera66311 ай бұрын
You're talking to an earth scientist. Vapor is by far in volume & potency because it has more windows open to IR. You are just trying to "will" something to be true because you follow the cult. It's seen readily in Plancks Radiation v Greenhouse Gas chart which you can find readily on the internet. @@luag_a
@rsskynet007 Жыл бұрын
So....what your saying is that we don't know how to do it on an industrial scale and even if we did it wouldn't be cost effective
@mpisusmat Жыл бұрын
Research and industry are both working on understanding the mechanisms and upscaling them. To be cost-efficient, not only reduction costs, but (green) energy and hydrogen production and transportation costs have to be considered.