Reducing the biggest industry emissions: Green steel

[@mickdoyle4844]

Very exciting. Good luck.

[@Nico-rw1uo]

No way the steel production can go green? No way, because megawatts are needed to power the production of steel, or if, the steel plant is situated next to a hydro power plant. Which is only for the case of a Canadian aluminium production plant, which uses power from the hydro dam.

[@nirmalmadhavan2697]

Can i use some parts of this video for my presentation?

[@mpisusmat]

Dear Nirmal, thanks for your interest. Yes, you can but please state the "Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH" as copyright and insert the link to this video. Good luck for your presentation :)

[@nirmalmadhavan2697]

@@mpisusmat Thank you so much 🙏🙏

[@kimlibera663]

H2O vapor is the more potent greenhouse gas.

[@luag_a]

This statement is wrong. Although water vapor is a greenhouse gas, CO2 is a significantly more potent greenhouse gas. Replacing CO2 with water vapor is therefore a very good idea.

[@kimlibera663]

You're talking to an earth scientist. Vapor is by far in volume & potency because it has more windows open to IR. You are just trying to "will" something to be true because you follow the cult. It's seen readily in Plancks Radiation v Greenhouse Gas chart which you can find readily on the internet. @@luag_a

[@rsskynet007]

So....what your saying is that we don't know how to do it on an industrial scale and even if we did it wouldn't be cost effective

[@mpisusmat]

Research and industry are both working on understanding the mechanisms and upscaling them. To be cost-efficient, not only reduction costs, but (green) energy and hydrogen production and transportation costs have to be considered.