Relative Solar Abundances of the Elements: A 100 year perspective!

[@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT]

Thank you Dr. Robitaille, for another very interesting video!

[@highseassailor]

As someone who is not even an amateur astronomer, this single video was epic for the amount of knowledge shared. I really enjoy my limited understanding, thanks in part to the wonderfully presented marerial.

[@Kalepsis]

I'd like to see a full list of all the observed phenomena that stellar physicists have simply discarded because they disagree with the model.

[@OneAccord1]

Me too. Guess one of us should get to compiling... ... ... NOT IT!!!

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

Some fields of study do have Mountains of it. evolutionary filters are #1 cause for discarding it. I wouldn't call evidence against models phonemona tho..

[@Sublimation250F]

Experiment suggestion: Wrap yourself in .25" tubing and run cold water through it, then test for how cool it makes you feel ..then put on the warmest clothes you can get and see if it still keeps you cool. It would be interesting to see who will be the first to prove or disprove how astronauts kept cool at 250 Fahrenheight. At minimum you could test how cold you can get water as it circulates through a tube passing through water that was frozen in a vacuum.

[@akulkis]

Most of them.

[@warpigjohnson9710]

It is so exciting seeing REAL science from a REAL scientist! Thank you, Dr. R!

[@keithnorris6348]

Thank you Dr. Robitaille, for taking the time to provide the extra context including the rememberance of the great minds that pave the way. I hope I will live to see the next video you present. Have a great time Merry Christmass and a happy new year.

[@kimberleebrackley2793]

Always a pleasure Dr.Robitaille, thank you and take care

[@spinderella3602]

Thank you! Glad you are making videos on a regular basis again.

[@carlubambi5541]

Fantastic as always Dr Robitaille ! Awesome as always

[@in2minutesorless64]

So glad to have you back!

[@tconiam]

Seems like Opacity and Dark Matter/Energy always change to make the models match the new observations. I wish I could adjust my income value so easily...

[@Horus2Osiris]

Thought becomes energy becomes form... What are you committed to create?

[@Dan-gs3kg]

Man where is ian w to debunk you, you threat to democracy /s

[@iteerrex8166]

I’m warning you I’m gona say hello to you. I always find that funny 😆

[@eltonrobb6208]

This should be added to a playlist, Doctor. Keep up the good work!

[@eltonrobb6208]

@@DrWhom You're dripping with sarcasm.

[@magnitudematrix2653]

Time, temperature, pressure and specific elements will give you a specific element. Every element is made by compression and refraction of the Universe through magnetism and low pressure velocity. Example, hydrogen carbon and a oxidizer compressed at specific velocity will give you oil.

[@akulkis]

....will give you a specific molecule*

[@StanJan]

Excellent. Thank you :)

[@nonlinearplasma1370]

The cooling process of a sunspot can be understood by examining the process that is also found in the Ranque-Hilsch Vortex. Plasma flux tube vortices are cooler in the center due to the same heat transfer system in compressed air vortices.

[@BlackMasterRoshi]

hmm

[@nonlinearplasma1370]

@@ianw5439 sorry but that doesn't explain the wilson depression. They are a vortex as observed by plasma flowing into them. If you are claiming that convection current is raising plasma from depth then you must have the capacity to allow plasma to sink. Have you ever pulled the sink plug out? Its the same process, MHD applies to both water and plasma for a reason.

[@nonlinearplasma1370]

@@ianw5439 have you ever seen a tidal Whirlpool? Rapidly rising currents create the vortices when the surface water descends past the rising water. Combine that with the magnetic flux vortices of the sun spot and maybe you will understand why the plasma descends at that point and theta pinches the "field lines" due to rotating charged plasma, similar to every electrical coil on the planet. If you don't know what flux vortices are I suggest you search flux pinning. Even Wikipedia has the answer so it shouldn't be to difficult. Another term you can search for is the Abrikosov vortex. Hope this helps you observe at a deeper level.

[@nonlinearplasma1370]

@@ianw5439 No it is you who is confused. Search this paper... It is from NASA "Sunspots and the physics of magnetic flux tubes. I - The general nature of the sunspot. II - Aerodynamic drag" Last paragraph of the abstract. "A downdraft of about two km/sec through the flux tubes beneath the sunspot is hypothesized." Your welcome to ignore the Theta pinch generated by rotating current all you want. Unfortunately I know how electricity works, unless you claim plasma isn't charged and when rotated produces a Theta pinch? You would also have to assume the only person with a mechanism for the waxing and waning solar cycle is wrong about that as well. Do you know the Earth and Sun have quadrupoles? Do you know Saturn has a sextupole? I hope you know how those magnetic structures form like I do?

[@nonlinearplasma1370]

@@ianw5439 I will take NASA's opinion over yours thanks. Clearly your ability to research is hindered by a cooling of matter between the ears since you haven't referenced a single paper or given a mechanism for the waxing and waning solar cycle.

[@ShamanartsFlorida]

Listening to your videos is like music for the intellect....thanks for your continued dedication...

[@seanleech8214]

Thank you for this conclusive and easily understandable presentation.

[@alpineflauge909]

excellent, thank you

[@Devast8r34]

Thank you Dr. Robitaille and all that helped

[@lmwlmw4468]

Thank you Professor. Another great explanation...!!!

[@ELMohel]

Oh my had I ,in my younger years, found this and known of your research and resources... wow alas 70s is late but love your information. ❤️❤️❤️ b.t.w. the chart you provided you said K =Δ181 the chart noted K= .0055 I do promote your videos especially on Not such thing as black holes...I as a lad spoke to Koffman who wrote a book on Black Holes when he was curator of Griffith Park Observatory the black hole idea was something, I could not understand the incongratuity between mass and photons in a massive magnetic source such as a black hole and the idea of a "event horizon" just did not set right with me. That is when he pointed me to Gordon Mitchell VP of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. He had given my brother and I permission to use the parks 12 inch Telescope cart Blanche. Where bright line and absorption line spectra was on my mind We had taken photos the Sun using no filter via reduction of aperture from 4 1/2 to 2 1/2 in. Showing high resolution. Gordon was impressed... THANK YOU FOR YOUR INFORMATION I WATCH YOU AND BEN DAVIDSON.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

Hello ElMohel: There is no error in his presentation. The potassium abundance has decreased by a factor of 181 (which is 1/0.0055). Sometimes the values increase... sometimes they decrease. But the last line at the bottom of the table has to be consistent. It's great that you are paying close attention to the videos. Wish some other people on this channel would do the same... Cheers, BG

[@ELMohel]

@@bushmangrizz4367 Thank you...❤

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@ianw5439 "Just a failure to report that the mismatch with helioseismology data is no longer a mismatch!" There you go again, quoting astrophysicists who don't have a clue what's going on.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@DrWhom "as opposed to you?" Brilliant. Well stated. As a tribe astrophysicists are beyond compare... ...in their ability to utter inanities.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@DrWhom "well, you're the expert" Go ahead and take a stab at proving my statement above wrong. Better yet, watch the video and find one thing that is so obviously wrong you can explain it to all of us.

[@davidmcguinness9187]

Thanks

[@barbarian1111]

Hi David 😉

[@davidmcguinness9187]

Hi Barb 👋

[@barbarian1111]

@@davidmcguinness9187 zero point energy exists 😉

[@Horus2Osiris]

Nothing exists but the One Emanation of One Source 😜

[@reefsroost696]

Hi guys 🖐

[@multi_misa72]

🤦🏻‍♂️, thanks doc, always pleasure.

[@grinch5263]

Could the observation and data collection process described in your last video be replicated for comparison if you had access to the SAFIRE test reactor? It would be of unique interest to compare the findings of both constituent elements found, their orientation in the atmosphere, and polarization states between lab setting and... a live subject. I believe most of these elements, including lanthanides, were found in chamber. That could really break some brains.

[@grinch5263]

@@ianw5439 try offering proof

[@grinch5263]

@@ianw5439 They were asked by Locheed who is invested in the project, to have EMSL Analytics perform a 3rd party inspection of their anode with EDAX and SEM, which they presented last year. Gate keepers gonna gatekeep.

[@Kenzofeis]

@@ianw5439 Early on, one of those involved in financing SAFIRE was ex-Skunkworks

[@Kenzofeis]

@@ianw5439 It was announced very clearly who the sponsors were, they had a presentation page with some description of each one on the "team".

[@Kenzofeis]

@@ianw5439 No connection between Lockheed Martin and "Skunkworks", and the terms "ex" and "former" are antonym, you say? Do explain how he was not _involved_ and at the same time he was? You know, there is a variant of narcissism where some twisted satisfaction comes from being basically a difficult toddler

[@critical-thought]

Thank you. Elemental composition should not be expected to remain constant - the local environment is dusty. But yes, those deltas do seem excessive.

[@Horus2Osiris]

Carbon x 15 & Silicon x 35... sounds like the solar sneeze to clear the metallic hydrogen matrix of the chromosphere will be ejecting some significant "solids" omnidirectionally... Wonder what velocity when it wallops our weakening magnetosphere...? *gulp*

[@critical-thought]

@@Horus2Osiris It will undoubtedly be significant. We are currently cresting the Parker instability, and a lot of dust comes with it … enough, I believe, to explain much of the measured deltas. And definitely enough to be blown off as isotope-rich solids.

[@critical-thought]

@@ianw5439 Wow. Your command of physics is astounding. Where did you learn that.

[@critical-thought]

@@ianw5439 Nothing to correct. Basic physics refutes your “dust evaporation” conjecture. You are a stupid bot.

[@critical-thought]

@@ianw5439 And the result of melting a material, in your estimation, is what exactly?

[@JanicePhillips]

Why would we assume the sun's composition is static? Just looking at it through SDO shows amazing thing's going on. Electrical things. Why wouldn't that effect the chemical make up? And why would we assume it wouldn't?

[@michelefishmanm.ed.8427]

Fascinating! Thank you for the information!

[@rustycarpenter1219]

Thanks your work is very important

[@barleyarrish]

As always very enjoyable...

[@barleyarrish]

@@DrWhom charming. manners of a guttersnipe.

[@JamesHolben]

Is it possible these changes in the ratios of the Sun's element could be the telltale signs of something about to occur....like a major solar outburst....12,000 year cycle? Any thoughts on that Dr. P?

[@JamesHolben]

@@ianw5439 I really dont time to do YOUR homework...but here is a good place for you to begin your edification: d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/41664084/Integrating_the_planetary_boundaries_and20160127-5592-gx1exf-libre.pdf?1453945194=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DIntegrating_the_planetary_boundaries_and.pdf&Expires=1671219441&Signature=Te2KuTvDRgygTr9NTj9XBWLvlKPO~ms4skltmdklEk9PgGFVwPM7Q5lB58tPnMAtZS4qu5IZpzchP6k~bYbMXjRIa82tz6wI6jLkstQzJZHoA4Ap26jD148u5sU0FuOkg-Ua81p8Z~qcvIcHshENktpn15IT5pg2Wyp4rNTGovoNlugdHYjdvUetAnImMl7bdYQic3MF0f4xRF4RfBjGySZ~VqnCqdDn35sBxnXyeNkVIXofybg6NGnaQqp0sXaUtV1-1KFCYGyk1Cu48Qj7GqLpxQJHtGdglLcXJkz3O444FiAti5DejAXlJsce4jcKR7AWFcPQ60gJrAmKQrc6~A__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA and here is another: www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.230423297

[@JamesHolben]

@@ianw5439 You know how to use a search engine, right?

[@JamesHolben]

@@ianw5439 perhaps you should expand your search....there is more on the internet than Dr. P, awesome though he is....

[@JamesHolben]

@@ianw5439 Dr. P has been on the Suspicious Observers videos several time...Go there and start your edification....

[@JamesHolben]

@@ianw5439 I ask Dr. P a question and I get nonsensical BS from you....go away troll.

[@EthanA1122]

I am wondering what your opinion is regarding the recent announcement about the Fusion breakthrough?

[@capttrinity9668]

Are all of these elements still being constantly created in the sun? By fusion or fission

[@Horus2Osiris]

SAFIRE showing electrochemical transmorgrification...

[@Kalepsis]

@@Horus2Osiris I think you mean elemental transmutation, which happens on the surface of the anode. If their hypothesis is correct, it wouldn't rule out the possibility that fusion is also happening in the regions above the solid core, considering the extremely high temperatures and pressures exhibited in the outer plasma layer shells in their experiment. With a stellar-sized anode, those reactions (and other chemical processes) would be expected.

[@shawns0762]

yes, by fusion, elements above iron on the periodic table are produced in super nova explosions

[@Dan-gs3kg]

@@shawns0762 but via Magnetic Dust Balls, we see that supernovae actually don't emit heavier elements to the interstellar medium.

[@Dan-gs3kg]

@@Kalepsis if you look back to the presentations, the elements they find in each layer is different.

[@barbarian1111]

👍🏻

[@raykeller6693]

Thanks for a good presentation. Sir…would you say that every proton in the Sun, must be or become, a primary light ray? A friend argued no, but I can see no other possibility! What say you?

[@Spritsailor]

And go Buckeyes!

[@Medicinnov8r]

Hello, I hope all is well in your wOrld, and I had a couple of questions, why can’t a black hole be just another version of a taurus? And why can’t the expansion of space be an example of momentum? Thank you in advance. MuchPeacefulWarm4GivingHugsLoveNStrength2You&ALL

[@whatsinthat3657]

Could the changes be influenced from the dust in the galactic current that has shown up lately?

[@Dan-gs3kg]

@@ianw5439 so you've not been keeping up with the study of the oscillation of the ecliptic plane, or the galactic nucleus? Funny that.

[@richardostroman8978]

Any information regarding the changes in the color of the sun. It is different then a few years ago. People have noticed it as well but is the science to agree with our observations?

[@BlackMasterRoshi]

In my experience the Earth's atmosphere affects the terrestrially perceived the color of the sun

[@stimpyfeelinit]

Did you happen to see the video made by "See the Pattern" on your theories and observations? I thought it was a fair review Dr. Robitaille. Have you given any thought to his questions? He is another astrophysicist with strong interrogations against the establishment.

[@stimpyfeelinit]

Oh I found a reply of yours under a personal channel name on his most recent LMH video. Oops!

[@bushmangrizz4367]

That video was little more than a hit piece, distorting what Dr. Robitaille actually said. Ask yourself, if they really cared about honest discussion why do they not pin Dr. Robitaille's strong rebuke at the top of the comments?

[@stimpyfeelinit]

@@bushmangrizz4367 I'd say less of a hit piece and more of a misunderstanding tbh

[@stimpyfeelinit]

@@ianw5439 Robitaille has papers with Nobel prize winners. You just have a hurt butt.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@DrWhom ""his strong rebuke" - do you have any idea how deranged you sound?" Certainly no more than you with your lack of wit, charm, and grace. You are doomed to the dust bin history along with your astrologer buddies.

[@doltBmB]

I'm not sure where you get the +0.8 from

[@mikejones-vd3fg]

theres only 1 way to fnd out... journey to the center of the sun!

[@Horus2Osiris]

See you there!

[@EddieVBlueIsland]

How is the delta factor calculated? It is clearly not an arithmetic difference for oxygen 8.8 -8.71=0.09?

[@robertle3038]

0:57 You are absolutely certain that one person did it?

[@captainsensible298]

Yep, the gaseous star model falls on it's face in every instance when detailed analysis is undertaken.

[@xkguy]

Only heretics argue about the number of angels that can fit on the head of a pin. The priests have already spoken and their wisdom is not to be challenged!

[@paulahoskins9972]

Can you imagine wanting to decrease C02 to zero? Thank you.

[@axeman2638]

I can imagine insane genocidal maniacs wanting to, in fact there's no need to imagine, they are doing it.

[@paulahoskins9972]

@@axeman2638 Yep. Sadly, the same psychopaths own and run the World.

[@redowlmoon7733]

Just another weapon of the control freak leftist

[@martinsoric4862]

Is the sun binnar star?

[@martinsoric4862]

@@midlander4 binnar as dinar

[@ThomasistheTwin]

The sun is a terrestrial object experiencing vulcanism in a global scale due to the wireless induction of power from the galaxy.

[@ThomasistheTwin]

@@ianw5439 according to academics all of the energy was imparted to the universe at the moment of the Big Bang and all we see in the unwinding of an explosion. If you think the sun is a thermonuclear explosion that is perfectly balanced by gravity and has been exploding for billions of years yet all explosions ever experienced happen in an instant leads one to wonder where the energy is actually coming from. All of the energy comes from outside of the system. One does not get to break all the rules of thermodynamics then claim they understand star formation.

[@ThomasistheTwin]

@@ianw5439 is it any coincidence that the same generation that discovered Thermo nuclear energy used that as an excuse to explain the energy of the sun. Just like Darwin used the work of Lyell. Evolution is based on uniformitarianism. Errors built in errors to a point where nothing has any logical consistency. The universe is noble and Comprehensible and you don’t need a PhD to understand this. Once you understand the goal of academia is to conceal the truth if not to find it then you will seek and find the truth for yourself. But if you believe that the world is not knowable then you will always appeal to authority and believe what you’ve been told to think.

[@ThomasistheTwin]

@@ianw5439 I Did you get an education I have tried to understand everything from the academics perspective and it led me back to what was revealed by the teachings of the messengers for The academic in the field Logan both agree we are moments before the 12 hour. Why do you think they are obsessed with deflecting comets and building bomb shelters deep? They can not hide from what is to come. “seek and you shall find for there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed and nothing buried that will not be raised.” Think critically and don’t be a sheep. Electromagnetism is the fundamental force in the universe Einstein discovered this and won his Nobel prize for the photo electric effect of light. This describes the relationship between the Ætherial and the material. Simply put electricity minus magnetism is dielectric. He then changed electricity to energy removed magnetism and added the square of the speed of light to the dielectric and change that to matter. Thus a great deception was born. Saying I’m wrong means nothing unless you can prove I am wrong, but you can’t all your can do is appeal to authority because you must believe what you’ve been told to think. This is what happens when one doesn’t seek for themselves.

[@ThomasistheTwin]

@@ianw5439 academia is an echo chamber and those that do not agree with the narrative will not have their papers published. This is not science and this is why you only hear about consensus even though there is nothing to be learned from it. The big bang, dark matter, black holes,internal dynamos have never been observed or experienced by any human being yet this passes is scientific fact.

[@TalkingGIJoe]

Education You know we receive an education in the schools from books. All those books that people became educated from twenty-five years ago, are wrong now, and those that are good now, will be wrong again twenty-five years from now. So if they are wrong then, they are also wrong now, and the one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is misled. All books that are written are wrong, the one who is not educated cannot write a book and the one who is educated, is really not educated but he is misled and the one who is misled cannot write a book which is correct. The misleading began when our distant ancestors began to teach their descendants. You know they knew nothing but they passed their knowledge of nothing to the coming generations and it went so innocently that nobody noticed it. That is why we are not educated. Now I will tell you what education is according to my reasoning. An educated person is one whose senses are refined. We are born as brutes, we remain and die as the same if we do not become polished. But all senses do not take polish. Some are to coarse to take it. The main base of education is one's "self-respect". Any one lacking self-respect cannot be educated. The main bases of self-respect is the willingness to learn, to do only the things that are good and right, to believe only in the things that can be proved, to possess appreciation and self control. Now, if you lack willingness to learn, you will remain as a brute and if you do things that are not good and right, you will be a low person, and if you believe in things that cannot be proved, any feeble minded person can lead you, and if you lack appreciation, it takes away the incentive for good doing and if you lack self control you will never know the limit. So all those lacking these characteristics in their makeup are not educated. Ed Leedskalnin, 1936.

[@somethingcool7903]

Silly rabbit tricks are for kids.......

[@tomnoyb8301]

Where is this headed? Round-about method to settle cosmic-background conflict? Or gave-up on that topic?

[@Horus2Osiris]

Solar micronova as galactic wave amps up our Solar center; the metallic hydrogen matrix sneezes off the accumulated heavier elements... is my understanding in a nutshell.

[@MrWolynski]

Solar wind measurements are most definitely relevant to what is happening in the Sun.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

Another Love Letter to Ian W. Dearest Ian, this isn’t actually for you, but anyone who happens to view the Comments section so they will know who the real religious zealot is. A zealot is someone excessively, fanatically committed to a particular point of view. This is often exhibited by excessively repeating the same refrain over and over again. For example, you insult Dr. Robitaille by repeating ad nauseam that he knows no physics, he’s a clown, a hack, and a religious zealot. Or you often insult others by calling them woo boy (still haven’t figured that one out). Zealots also often lie. For example, claiming that Dr. Robitaille is not the father of ultra-high MRI. You might ask just about any ultra-high MRI scientist if that is the case as he trained many, perhaps most of them. You also may want to consult the scientific literature on this as it is clear who the father of ultra-high MRI is. You call Dr. Robitaille a religious zealot, a priest rather than a scientist. Yet he has never made a single mention of any religious view point in any of his videos. Max Planck was profoundly Lutheran. His grandfather was one of the single most important Lutheran theologians. According to your logic Planck should be ignored. A zealot is also someone who can never see the other side of the argument. Even when the facts stand in front of them. Why would you see the other side? You have never read a single paper of Dr. Robitaille’s. You don’t even watch the videos. Yet you think by quoting astrophysics papers that you don’t even read or understand you have made an effective argument. The only religious zealot on this channel are the trolls who never offer a credible rebuttal. Some don’t even try. At least you do try, Ian. But your debating skills are laughable. They are embarrassing. If you are the best defender of astrophysics, no wonder it is a joke.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@ianw5439 "Nope, a zealot is someone who spends ~ a years salary posting scientifically impossible gibberish as an ad in the NYT, at the same time as a debate is occurring in his home state about the teaching of evolution in schools. Who then refuses to distance himself from creationism/ ID when given the opportunity to do so." You are the zealot, repeating the same nonsense like a broken record, thinking that somehow wins the day. Dr. Robitaille does not have to distance himself from your false accusations because they are false accusations. You hateful, lying, broken, little man. Get a life, Ian. Or a wife, or girlfriend, or friend.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@ianw5439 "All of it true. And all of it in the public record. He's a creationist. Admit it. Grow a pair." Right. Public record. Okay, quote the public record where Dr. Robitaille invoked anything religious.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@midlander4 "he's a lying creationist bs artist. Why are you white knighting for this sad grifting boomer? It's not a good look." I ask you the same thing. You are white knighting for astrology. I'll say one thing. You know how to use tired insults. When has Dr. R. ever said anything religious?

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@ianw5439 " NYT. When asked to deny connections to creationism/ ID (same thing) he refused. Any real scientist being asked such a question would be horrified, and deny it. Robitaille hasn't. And still won't. He's a creationist, or some other kind of religious fundy. And is crap at physics." Even if the lying NYT asked him anything to do with creationism Dr. R. is not under any responsibility to address it. It's a typical "when did you stop beating your wife" hit-piece question. Dr. R. does not have to defend false accusations. You continue to spread false accusations. You need to be sued. Your world is falling apart. A weak man grabbing at straws to keep from being drowned. You are weak. Your science understanding is weak. You are a zealot and ideologue in the truest sense. Astrophysics is a joke. You do not represent science.

[@bushmangrizz4367]

@@midlander4 " no-degree grizz fs it up yet again." Thank you for your latest confession that you have no argument.

[@FlightSimDude]

👍