Reliability Basics - Mikes Inventions

[@sedenzespiritu2678]

I like how you get to the point "both items have to fail before you DIE"

[@WiekingderViking]

You use a block holding your pens! Hey, that was my idea. Well done.

[@r1di3169]

Thanks for the help Mike

[@Angiejamk]

This was awesome. Thank you.

[@liamtaylor5523]

Brilliant video , thanks

[@kengsamnang7225]

What is the structure function of Reliability?

[@wailadjali9578]

Can you give an idea about how can we convert PID to reliability block diagram?

[@Vathanaization]

Thanks alot Mike

[@BEFOUND.]

can you refere me to smeone who I can get training to use windchill software for risk and reliability analysis

[@MikesInventions]

Hey! No sadly. I’m not much help there. Thanks for watching though

[@80expertube]

Fantastic!

[@ahmetardaari]

I love your content!

[@midkort]

Good stuff. Thanks.

[@mudsp1ash]

Thank you kind sir

[@wrestlingscience]

What's this for? Computer systems? Engineering?

[@MikesInventions]

Anything really. I suppose you can even apply it to people. We all know a few that aren't reliable don't we?

[@warrior_number]

Hello , i need some deep knowledge for the subject reliability and safety theory. İ failed from this subject at the University. İ need to pass. Could you please help me ? İ need some lessons from a knowledgeable person

[@kengsamnang7225]

Hello! Sire

[@DanielL143]

Your statement that .1 is the inverse of .9 is incorrect - your basic math is unreliable. The inverse of .9 is not .1 it is 1.1 sir. It also seems that you are incorrectly interchanging the 'probability of failure' with actual failure rate (lambda) in your explanation. A more rigorous use of terminology would be appreciated.