Relocate Your MAT Is It Worth It 🤔

[@terrywagaman8027]

Yes I did .. to the airbox happy with results 90 ..174k no rich fuel issues

[@garypiont6114]

Love the l98.

[@garypiont6114]

Why not have both

[@Madmax.3]

No the table you mention at 11:50 uses airflow look at the table it says grams per sec when you turn off the mat look up as you did and only use the counts table the car will run lean or rich at low speed idle or off throttle bc thats when there is no air flow only using one table as you did will require tuning other parameters to compensate when the engine isnt drawing air like at idle or when your off throttle this is why i sent you the both updated tables in the other video those values are better values when using sensor in air box use those two tables and keep the check box checked on like factory

[@Madmax.3]

when you click on sort by newest comments in other video you will then see the new values i use for both tables

[@E.T.GARAGE]

I attached a link to what I go by Like I said in the video everyone has there own way of tuning. www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-prom/265869-mat-pw-compensation-8d.html

[@Madmax.3]

@@E.T.GARAGE correct everyone has there own way but even from your link it describes it as using airflow grams per sec. not as you describe at 11:50. when you turn this table off you have to adjust other paramaters to get the fuel correct. they way i do it is still use both tables but insert new vaules for both when the sensor is relocated a user from those forums spent two years testing to get those values he went through all the temps summer and winter to come up with the new values

[@garypiont6114]

Did you recently clean your engine bay, looks good. Thanks

[@E.T.GARAGE]

No didn't clean it