René Descartes's proof of the Soul

[@SanctusApologetics]

Comment Feedback!

[@rickfilmmaker3934]

Thank You, very good. "Truth is that which can not be doubted."

[@samanthaannfuchsgruber]

thank you so much for these wonderful videos! ✨✝ God Bless you! ♥

[@dynamic9016]

Amen

[@James-ll3jb]

Descartes uses pure Reason to Prove the existence of the Soul

[@apostolicfollower]

Good stuff!

[@ftgclan9355]

For real

[@faithwisdom788]

Has the church say anything on his argument for the soul?

[@DreamlessSleepwalker]

@@SanctusApologetics BRO STOP YOU'RE KILLING ME! The Council of Vienne contradicts it, arguably every verse in the Bible describing a physical object having color contradicts Descartes's philosophy, and this 'pope in chair or I don't have to believe' mentality is literally just stupid radtrad and liberal magisteriology.

[@milesmill2566]

Quick question: Are you Catholic or Orthodox

[@JeetTheFire]

He is catholic

[@SanctusApologetics]

I am personally Roman Catholic, but most of my videos are just for any Christians.

[@milesmill2566]

@SanctusApologetics thanks for your responses. I'm becoming Catholic, too. I'm getting baptized and confirmed this Easter with my brother. Thanks for your videos. You will grow in no time

[@SanctusApologetics]

@@milesmill2566 Oh wow, good for you! I will definitely pray for you and your confirmation, God bless!

[@marcokite]

@@milesmill2566 - I'm becoming Orthodox (leaving the Roman Catholic Church). I'm getting confirmed this Easter.

[@blackroses6315]

I disagree. He may not be thinking at all, and could just be an observer of thought. Also to say that one can live without a body is ridiculous, and to deny its existence even when you move with it, live with it and are never separated from it is crazy to me. Anyway, love the video! keep up the good work :)

[@jameslay1489]

I've never seen a mind in of itself, I have however seen bodies with minds seemingly attached to them.

[@platlo4848]

To be an observer of thought but to not think is a nonsensical statement, as to be an observer of thought you'd still think about being said observer of thought. Can you imagine existing without a body? Can you imagine not existing?

[@Jimmy-iy9pl]

​@@jameslay1489that's the absolute worst argument against substance dualism I've ever heard. The mind is immaterial and incapable of being directly observed. That's philosophy of mind 101 lol

[@jameslay1489]

@@Jimmy-iy9pl yet no one has yet to demonstrated that a mind can exist without a brain.

[@Jimmy-iy9pl]

@@jameslay1489 and that's question begging against every argument that's been put forward in defense of substance dualism, such as Richard Swinburne's revamped version of the Cogito or Howard Robinson's version of the knowledge argument. There are dozens of different arguments for immaterialism (dualism and idealism) that you need to refute to make good on that claim.

[@mbogucki1]

Hobbes and Locke would disagree.

[@James-ll3jb]

...faintly...

[@James-ll3jb]

"The proposition 'I am, I exist' is necessarily true each time that I pronounce it, or that I mentally conceive it." Only something which exists, can doubt that it exists. Consider then this: "Only something which exists can doubt that I pronounce it, or that I mentally conceive it."

[@turnz153]

do u debate people?

[@SanctusApologetics]

I like to debate and have religious discussions, so ya definitely.