Restoring cross-sections to aid subsurface structural interpretation

  Рет қаралды 2,620

Rob Butler

Rob Butler

2 жыл бұрын

Part of The Shear Zone channel. Being able to drawn a balanced cross-section is an important step in assessing the "validity" of a structural interpretation of the subsurface. This presentation develops this approach to show how structural restoration, assessed for balance, can be used to investigate different models to explain the structure of folds on cross-sections, using an example based on structures in the outer part of the French Alps.

Пікірлер: 5
@rprabir
@rprabir 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent illustration. I must say you are doing a fabulous job by putting these high quality lectures in public domain. May I ask the name of the software you are using for balancing?
@robbutler2095
@robbutler2095 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you - I'm glad you're finding them useful. As for balancing software - I don't use anything technical. I'll draw an interpretation and then iterate to clean up small irregularities of the loose line (as implied in this video). So it's just a question of measuring bed-lengths and cross-sectional areas. This is straightforward using any graphics package, especially if you can be working with a grid in the background to the main artwork. In my view it is especially important not to be tied in to any specific structural style or section construction method (as I discuss in other videos) as these restrict the "solution space" in interpretation and can bias outcomes. Thank you for the question!
@LongHoang-lp1dm
@LongHoang-lp1dm Жыл бұрын
Hi Rob, three models gave me an excellent way of thinking. the measurement you made here was manually. I am wondering if there is any portable software can do that. have you ever played with MOVE structural geological modelling software? I found it quite helful but a bit costy. Thanks alot!
@robbutler2095
@robbutler2095 Жыл бұрын
There are plenty of apps that can measure line-length and areas (eg Acrobat). My students and I use Move a lot for measuring and comparing complex surfaces (e.g. from 3D seismic) but I don't use software to construct sections/restore because they're too restrictive - unless you want to show a particular type of interpretation.
@LongHoang-lp1dm
@LongHoang-lp1dm Жыл бұрын
@@robbutler2095 Thanks Rob!
Balancing a cross-section: central Appalachians
11:32
Rob Butler
Рет қаралды 2,2 М.
Line-length restoration - a demonstration
18:17
Rob Butler
Рет қаралды 2,4 М.
Survival skills: A great idea with duct tape #survival #lifehacks #camping
00:27
ОСКАР vs БАДАБУМЧИК БОЙ!  УВЕЗЛИ на СКОРОЙ!
13:45
Бадабумчик
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
1❤️
00:17
Nonomen ノノメン
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Subduction - how we know
12:19
Rob Butler
Рет қаралды 7 М.
The Man Who Solved the World’s Hardest Math Problem
11:14
Newsthink
Рет қаралды 573 М.
The Science Of Flatness
13:01
New Mind
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Red River Fault: Ring of Fire - tectonic journeys in East Asia
9:46
Extrusion tectonics: Ring of Fire - tectonic journeys in E Asia
6:30
The Essentials of Problem Solving
37:02
Benjamin Keep, PhD, JD
Рет қаралды 142 М.
Survival skills: A great idea with duct tape #survival #lifehacks #camping
00:27