Reverse D'Alembert

[@TheeTalkingDog]

Very nice video. It’s important to point out that unless your bet selection win rate is over 50%, you will consistently lose. Another variation of this would be to start with a 3 unit bet, then increase 1 unit upon a win and decrease 1 unit after a loss. This reduces the “slope”. So let’s say your normal bet size is $90, then that’s your start bet, if win, next bet is 120, if win again, then bet $150, if you lose the $150, reduce to 4 units $120.

[@davidorama6690]

You only ever win if you quit while you’re ahead. A stop win of 2 units per shoe - being 2 units up means you’re always cheating the odds of any given shoe - to expect more is just fanciful.

[@hansyulianto]

And when you lose, how many units do you lose then you stop ?

[@vodkatonic814]

What about using this for Blackjack?

[@sttony7647]

At last. Someone actually talks sense. I do believe that if smart people were to watch your videos, there might be a decline in people putting bets on realising the house wins. Not withstanding that, and I appreciate that this has nothing to do with the above system, but predominantly Fibonacci. I was wondering if you had carried out any type of simulation whereby someone betting on the columns or dozens uses a strategy of not placing any bets until that column has not appeared for perhaps six times and then bets and repeats the dummy spins process. Very slow and laborious, but I was just wondering if you had such statistics. Many thanks for looking if you do see this message.

[@darthvader822]

You do understand Shackleford's income comes entirely from his website where he gets compulsive gamblers to sign up to online casinos? It is not like he wants to wise up any suckers.

[@tonygale5455]

Interesting. At the end of the day, its all about timimg. Most of the time, the casino wins. Thanks for analising this method.

[@jasonmartineaux6492]

NEVER USE A SIMULATOR TO TEST YOUR STRATEGY, BETTER YET IF YOU CAN TEST YOUR STRATEGY ON A SIMULATOR THEN IT'S MOST LIKELY WORTHLESS BECAUSE IT IS A VERY ROBOTIC STRATEGY AND THAT MEANS YOU ARE PLAYING EACH AND EVRY SPIN

[@TheeTalkingDog]

It’s NOT about timing at all. It is ALL about bet selection. Picking one side and staying on that side is a recipe for disaster. You should change your bet selection as you see which side is the stronger side. There are many other factors but the dominant side is just a primitive example .

[@jasonmartineaux6492]

@@TheeTalkingDog ALL THESE ARE IS SIMPLY RECOUPING SYSTEMS NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS. THEY ARE NOT COMPLETE STRATEGIES TO TAKE TO THE CASINOS.YOU STILL NEEDS A BET PLACMENT STRATEGY TO MATCH IT ,SOME HOW PLAYERS DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THIS .PLUS YOU SHOULD NOT BE PLAYING EACH AND EVERY SPIN.

[@tonygale5455]

I would never use this system. Michael has confirmed it. I have a system that is so far 100%. I need to go and do it for real. The problem is I cannot gamble where I work. The nearest next casino is some 1600km or 1000 miles away. I live in Perth, Western Australia!

[@rayver69]

What's your Strat?! Also have you heard of Stake online

[@Wizardofwager]

I have a video on my channel that explains why I have the smartest system.. ^^

[@tonyobadiaru4100]

What's your system bro? I build systems too. Let's talk

[@tonyobadiaru4100]

Let's exchange systems