Review: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro 2.0L Turbo

[@rexfordham3494]

My first Camaro was a 1967 RS 350 4 speed put out like 325 hp. My second was an 82 IROC with a 305 V-8 crossfire fuel injection and was the biggest piece of junk made, 190 HP o-60 in 12 seconds. I can't believe Chevy was able to put 275 HP in a 4 cylinder I am 60 yrs old and I am going to buy 1 final new car and have decided to go with the favorite car of my youth and my last car will be a Camaro. And 60 or not I will drive it like I was 20. So I hope the Arizona Cops will give me a break when I go screaming down the road . You may be to old for somethings but never to old for a camaro. Thanks Chevy for bringing her back with such class.

[@Z177]

I agree... at 62 years young..I think these new cars are great

[@curbstomp3126]

I'd buy the ZR1

[@wordlife_97]

So Rex, how do you like the car?

[@brax5870]

4D WordLife lmfaoo

[@cristian9955ify]

RIP rexforham.... I remember he was a good guy always loved camaros.. 😭

[@maximus9401]

Hey I just realized that this is one of the first if not THE first legit KZbin review about the 2.0 turbo Camaro model!

[@nawmean]

+maximus9401 no shit sherlock

[@nboy7]

I really like the new American turbo-4 cars.

[@Arayig1982]

one really an opel (gm) and the other really a mazda (ford) so not that much american really

[@zerohourdrift]

Arayig1982 you do realize that the ltg engine that’s in the camaro was in stuff like the cobalt years before opel right? Gm has owned opel for years, so it’s not accurate saying that it’s an opel engine. It’s a gm engine that gm also puts in opels lmao

[@Arayig1982]

@@zerohourdrift and you do know that a cobalt is just a rebodied opel astra which had the turbo and 260 hp long before the cobalt did.

[@zerohourdrift]

Arayig1982 yes, but the ltg is a new ecotec platform. The cobalt never had an ltg. They had the lsj and the le5 and such, which were predecessors. And the cobalt isn’t a “rebodied” opel. It is a shared platform, so it wasn’t one before the other. Fact of the matter is, opel is owned and run by gm, and their engines are American engines🤷‍♂️

[@Arayig1982]

@@zerohourdrift it ain't, once again you're wrong. It's now groupe PSA. Delta platform is opel's and now without them, gm pretty much doesn't have any car models other than daewoo as chevys, the Corvette and one or two caddys.

[@gregisaacs3236]

Get ready for the haters. I sure hope last gens V6'ers don't stoop to V8'ers level and flex at ones who choose the 4cyl. Each of these engines has their pros and cons. V8, best sounding, most powerful, most fun. Cons: only takes premium/supreme fuel or it'll run like shit, more expensive maintenance, insurance, car payment V6, decent sound, great power, runs only on unleaded fuel, more balanced than the 8. Cons: Is a jack of both trades (performance, fuel) but a master of neither. 4cyl, runs unleaded, best fuel,great power for the fuel economy, lightest. Cons: not aggressive at all.

[@CyrilJanDacasin]

Summary: Buy the model that fits your needs.

[@its12gagebruh31]

My current car is a 2008 Chevy Aveo I think of 4 cylinder Camaro would be plenty aggressive for me 😂😂😂

[@marekbortnowski3110]

i want camaro because of its looks not for spped and i use premium gas even in my hyundai i20 1.2 from 2009

[@nickberger3655]

Drove one of these at work yesterday, and it surprised the hell out of me. It would probably give my old '95 Z28 a run for its money, and so would the V6.

[@mat1775]

I'm pretty satisfied with my 2016 Camaro 2.0T. I believe the car is pretty underestimated, I thought it was going to be slow but it actually pulls pretty fast for a car with 275 HP and 295 torque. I'm getting stock 0-60s in 5.3 to 5.4. The fastest I got was a 0-60 in 5.2 running 93 octane. For the power it puts out the numbers are fairly quick. Not to mention I've raced my friends 2016 Mustang V6 which has 300 HP and surprisingly won in a 1/4 race. My best 1/4 was 13.9 at 103. And the car is stock so it's pretty respectable at stock and with a few tunes in the future it should be pretty damn fast considering its 200 pounds lighter than the new V6 and V8

[@Albertoepicness]

Congrats on your car

[@Rizzy_K]

Well it's a lot lighter than the mustang. Horsepower isn't everything so not really surprising

[@Albertoepicness]

hussein335 =(

[@jonathonhasling4295]

what the difference between 4clyn and 6clyn

[@mat1775]

Nothing much really the less weight and more torque of the 4cyl makes it almost identical to the V6 0-60 in both are pretty identical same with 1/4 the v6 only being marginally faster

[@ELENibiru]

I have the 3LT RS 2.0 T and I'm not turning back. I'm very happy with my buy. Ppl think it's double the price of what I paid.

[@protovack]

just got a 2019 turbo 4 camaro and I must say, it is super fun to drive. It feels so much lighter than the SS and under 120 it feels just as fast. Ultimate daily sports car.

[@StreetSpeed717]

Just me or does it sound exactly like the ecoboost? Guess that's not really a surprise considering it's a similar setup though lol. Awesome job Matt!

[@theunknown4772]

That's Murica I-4's for ya!

[@ccp8060]

+Street Speed 717 one reson I like u so muchu wach other chanels and give them complments

[@WilliamStewart1]

Pretty much all inline 4 twin scroll turbo engines sound the same. Straight pipe everyone and you get the exact same sound.

[@bunythebeastgamer6920]

Stfu

[@michellelewis9921]

It's called turbo lol

[@danielsherrill7085]

I routinely get between 34-40 mpg with my 2.0T Camaro, and the car is really quick and fun to drive. It'll easily outrun my '96 Z28 to 60, and embarrass it on a curvy road. The squeaks and rattles of the previous gens are gone and the car feels solid and well built. I give Chevrolet two thumbs up on this new Camaro. The only thing I miss is the V8 rumble.

[@MrJohnnyDistortion]

And I use to get 34/40 in my '70 440 Six-Pack Super Bee.

[@Briguy1027]

Seems like a great deal with all of the standard features and the color is really pretty as well.

[@ScottZ370]

Originally thought it was a bit of a joke having a 2.0 4 pot in this car but 5.4 seconds to 60 is more than good

[@GrandCamino6]

+S Miller Heck the 1993 Camaro Z28 with the 1st year 275hp LT1 did 0-60 in 5.7 seconds and did the 1/4 mi in 14.5 seconds (Auto trans) at around the same trap speed as this base 4cyl turbo Camaro. That's pretty dang impressive!

[@BEBNC1]

+GrandCamino6 True...but that slush box A4 and crap gearing did the LT1 no justice. A 1993 T-56 manual Z28 could pull mid-high 13s (13.6-13.8) all day with a good driver.

[@GrandCamino6]

+BEBNC1 True the 460LE is not the best trans but I only used it as an example as this car has an auto trans. You have to admit that it's pretty impressive that a 2.0L Turbo nearly matching the performance of a previous gen car with over twice the displacement. Of course I loved the LT1 sound from back in the day.

[@jdlarson11]

7 inches is plenty...

[@maximusterrellius7183]

+JDLARSON11 hmmm... lmao

[@ravenstylea2]

+JDLARSON11 That's what she said.

[@730F-Sport]

sus

[@natevoie1715]

anybody notice that the automatic gear shifter sitting between the two round air vents looks like a....... part of the male anatomy lol. I wonder if they did that on purpose, to make you feel more manly diving an auto.

[@Ravaniscool]

+ravenstylea2 Or he! LOL!

[@Wabbitsw]

These videos really have the best detailed information about the given car. Especially info on the interiors. You're able to cover so many aspects of the car in a very quick manner that I truly appreciate. Thanks!

[@KnowledgeSharingTech]

your reviews are great and authentic as always. I specially appreciate it when you review base cars because not everyone can afford fully optioned ones.

[@CeeStyleDj]

I think the engine is underrated for insurance purposes. It's probably putting out closer to 300 horsepower

[@Always_Never]

this dude got so happy at 7:05 when he said he was going to attempt the "straight" road

[@luisvlogs5560]

dead lmao

[@surgecaliber]

Lol Dude I'm telling you He always gets excited it cracks me up Hilarious 'Okay let's go down this straight road and see what this is about' woah!!!!

[@bryanmchugh1307]

man I am old. I remember way back when the 5.0 225hp Mustang was the shiznit. My how things have changed

[@bigdawgfan72]

it's crazy what the 4 bangers are putting out these days, more than v-8s of the 80s

[@XxGreYSh0TxX]

Hell ya Matt, one of the first reviews I've seen available of this car.

[@kelvinchannel9592]

nice for a base model

[@treyscales6811]

His little hand gestures at the beginning of videos crack me up

[@jaguar123987x]

+Trey O Like a desperate clown LMOA

[@MALKton]

AHAHAHAH X,-D

[@dennismattson8383]

I've had V8/Stick Muscle cars most of my life.... I have NO problem with this car at all.. I'm actually selling my Mustang GT for a BRZ, or Camaro 4....

[@theguy4615]

I was looking at buying a v6 camaro, but came across a great deal on a new 2021 1ls manual so bought it. It would give my c4 lt1 vette a run for its money, pretty amazing for a four cylinder. Light, nimble, quiet, and quick for the price of a corolla.

[@schmoab]

Great review! This car is likely faster than the V-6 at high altitude. I'm going to test drive one. I love the interiors.

[@ajstiles_tv]

I have a 4 cylinder turbo and I love it. I bought one because I was on a budget and a Camaro is my dream car. Once i make more money I’m looking at buying an RS 6 cylinder. Just love this car

[@killerkeemaronie1076]

I like how Ford/Chevy are trying to aim at the tuner market with these cars.

[@Slapaho1100]

Killer Keemaronie tuner market? how tuner? they make RWD cars with turbos not front wheel drive trash. besides these can make more torque than a v8 has horsepower

[@ImperialDoor]

Killer Keemaronie They are still heavy as shit.

[@Patchuchan]

Maybe a stock V8 from the 1980s as it only makes 275 hp. The LGX V6 Camaro makes 335 hp which is 60 more horsepower and even the new push rod V6 in the truck line is more powerful at 285 hp and while running on 87 octane gas. GM would have did a better job if they took an engine from their truck line and put it in the car. The LV3 is a LS family V8 with two cylinders chopped off so from a tuning perspective with would beat both the Ecotech and the LGX.

[@TheFreshPeddler]

there are plenty of japanese rwd cars.

[@pontiacGXPfan]

The Cruze needs this engine in the worst....it's going to waste in a Camaro

[@OwninFools2020]

I remember watching this review when it came out, and now in 2023, I bought a brand new 23 Camaro LS. Everything you said is true and I just had to come back and watch this. Best 29k I've spent, so sad GM is cutting the Camaro

[@peyn]

I have been waiting so long to see a review of the 4 cylinder lol THANK YOU

[@CarsnStuff]

Sounds much better than most 2 liter engines. I mean it seams to have alittle grunt to it but i like the turbo placement. I can see that engine plateform being an easily modded bay. Im sure its a fun car.

[@stevedbutler1990]

it didn't make him squeal when he flattened it so it's no good. Everyone who's watched his videos for a while knows the good cars make him squeal.

[@castejb]

Man I enjoyed the fact you started showing the car's engine and giving the 0-60 stats

[@JB_561]

im surprised cars still come with satellite radio. Ive yet to meet 1 person that actually uses it

[@jon.wilson]

Well I know a lot of people that use satellite radio, so I guess it balances out.

[@JB_561]

Your right. Different demographic probably

[@MattMaranMotoring]

+Jonathan Williams I use mine every day.

[@Anthony-df4bs]

+Jonathan Williams Howard Stern, baby.

[@itsbonertme666]

I used it a couple of months ago in a friends car when our phones were dead and our charger wasn't working. We just cycled through all the random Channels and laughed our asses off at the weird shit we listened to.

[@gatorunleashed275]

I test drove a V6 Automatic yesterday and loved it, came really close to buying it.

[@charmedlilsis1]

He's so right about the visibility. When I first bought my camaro and was driving home at night, I panicked a little like "did i make a good choice buying this because I cant see shit." Lol But you get used to it.

[@trollord2775]

Uhm what now O.o Im scared now

[@charmedlilsis1]

@@trollord2775 Dont be. It is hust awkward at first but you get used to it. There's a backup camera so you dont need to be able to look out the back glass to backup. I bought my 2017 Camaro at the very end of 2018 and I havent regretted it.

[@sugerhitman1295]

@@charmedlilsis1 Yep. You mod and tuned yours yet?

[@kevinbrady75]

wow someone who actually reviews all cars and not just there top most expensive model..def subbing and hitting that bell

[@FastandFurious_family4ever]

I'm ford guy but I love the Camero more than mustang.

[@nickyman1405]

Then you're not a Ford guy

[@kez850]

+Choco Man 😂

[@FastandFurious_family4ever]

Choco Man that's your opinion.

[@TheRealBilby]

+Ryu Kombat best. response. ever.

[@VaunShiz]

to ugly

[@2fast4all]

The motor is also found in the Regal/ATS/CTS/CT6/Malibu and Opel Insignia. Good ol' GM.

[@MountainMitchYT]

I don't understand why everyone is so picky in car videos. Jesus, they're trying, if you have a slightly different opinion or find them annoying just don't dislike, he is trying.

[@Airsoftgurl]

Stripe and auto are not the only options on the base 1lt you can also get the rs package

[@MrJagfootball63]

I feel like you try to speak as quickly as possible at the start of every video just because you know it sounds funny

[@silentshooter172]

Great memories. I remember having a 2016 Camaro RS V4. Now I traded it in for a 2018 Camaro 2ss(V8).

[@carguysunite1288]

Nobody makes a v4 lol figure it out hahaha

[@silentshooter172]

Chuck Sedore shows you’re stupidity lmao Ford Mustang and Chevy Camaro both make a V4

[@carguysunite1288]

Nope. I-4 man ut go ahead and project your stupidity onto me asshole

[@carguysunite1288]

Silent Shooter they are I-4's. Go ahead and project your stupidity on me though.

[@justinbrostrom241]

Must have been the legebdary Ducati Camaro V4

[@Prince-yr1ln]

It's fucking beautiful.

[@Tyrant96]

HooRawww

[@tabcan]

Thanks for the look under the hood. Feel free to spend more time there on all of your future reviews. Best regards.

[@davidpianista234]

Houston, we have a problem!!!, we lost 4 cylinders!

[@mazduhhh]

I just got a 2016 rs last week and I love it ☺ This review was great!

[@blackraid1]

+Marie Zedaker take me for a ride :(( ?

[@atobg_]

so much nicer than a base ecoboost

[@Callusny]

This is great for Ireland. Road tax per year is 750 vs 2250 for V8 models. Then insurance is about 2 or 3 times less as well.

[@JimJones-zc9mk]

Chevy should bring back the inline 6 and stick that into the base camaro.

[@ramsonluke452]

+Jim Jones they are just some time...

[@PotentialEn3rgy]

+Jim Jones turbo.

[@plottwist1733]

+Jim Jones That'd be cool, but inline 6's have pretty much been phased out in cars. The only car manufacturer that still makes inline 6 cars is BMW. Every other manufacturer prefers V6's because they're more compact. It won't be long until cars that have traditionally had 8 and 6 cylinder opinions to only be available with inline 4's, which sucks in my opinion, but you can blame the economy for that.

[@Patchuchan]

Actually they already have the perfect engine for the base Camaro the LS based LV3 V6 it makes 285 hp and 305ft of torque in the Chevy Silverado. If they give it a cam and intake better suited for use in a sports car it could make over 300hp while running on 87 octane regular gas. Wouldn't matter if it got 2 or 3 mpg worse the cost of fuel would still be lower.

[@kevin122759]

The 4.2 litre inline 6 that GM put in the trailblazer is a great motor. Produced 290 hp and had 90% of its torque at 1600 rpm.

[@theunknown4772]

That actually sounds better than I expected

[@GrandCamino6]

+Danny Contreras I agree that sounds pretty nice! I like the black soot coming out of the exhaust in the exhaust view ;)

[@marinoint]

Music is a very subjective thing, and since your channel is about cars, you should minimize the length & volume of your music. People subscribe to your channel to watch car reviews, not to listen to your music. Go watch 'Alex on Autos' channel if you don't know what I'm talking about.

[@josepineda6070]

i like how it still comes with a touchscreen unlike other brand that make you pay more for a screen.

[@mckookie2967]

Nice car, love my "base" Mustang

[@NicholasKjernisted]

+MCKOOKIE Refreshing to see someone who can appreciate both.

[@mckookie2967]

Nicholas Kjernisted If i didnt love the new Mustang so much id be driving a new V6 RS, i both and Challengers are awesome to me.

[@trentonnevin7791]

Thank you DODGE for not giving a crap about mpg.

[@SandovalHely]

Trenton Nevin and reliability

[@angrybird32495]

4 cylinder in a Camaro! What has the world come to!!??

[@RivieraByBuick]

hello from 1982. camaro already had 4 cylinders 34 years ago.

[@starbattles1]

I didn't agree with it 34 years ago and I still don't.

[@angrybird32495]

If I want a 2.0 litre Chevy I would buy a Cavilier or Cobalt or Cruise or whatever the hell they are making these days...

[@Rebel_71123]

But those are ugly compared to this.

[@powerwindow2]

last week i saw an "RS" badge on a chevy cruise. kinda dilutes the true meaning if gm is just sticking that on cars for a trim pkg w/o the performance to back it up. reminds me of when chevy made the chevette "sport"

[@TechnicalBarbarity]

I dont get all the people who complain about "sitting low" or having to "look over" the dash. Do you guys not realize that the seats are adjustable? My girl is 5'8 amd she has no problem whatsoever with the drivers seat

[@starbattles1]

That guy was probably about 5'6" tall. A guy 6' tall wouldn't complain. These are big boy cars lol.

[@phgamer4393]

ford goofed when they deliberately crippled their base model to push ecoboosts. Also it sounds like camaro handles better.

[@rasvial]

+PHGamer because turbo'd engines aren't in at all right now. good one

[@emmanagg9257]

awesome! because of this review as one of my deciding factors i bought a 2017 turbo 4cyl camaro! thanks dude! thanks tom henry....

[@thecamlog]

Summary of review: - It's very nice - Really nice - Nice - Nyce - Nice and deep

[@DeadalusG]

Nice

[@gentlemonsterkennels]

I would never ever ever consider getting a 4 or 6 cylinder when a v8 option is available. But damn! Those are some impressive numbers! Camaro is killing it.

[@ace2795]

So did I understand correctly in that the base turbo Camaro only come with an automatic transmission?

[@MattMaranMotoring]

+Alberto S no, I said at the beginning of the review the two options this car has is an automatic and the stripe. A few others have been thinking it doesn't come with an automatic either for some reason but the standard transmission it comes with is a manual.

[@kelvinchannel9592]

+subaruwrxfan are this one a 8 speed?

[@Ravaniscool]

+kelvin oliver Yes, it is.

[@kelvinchannel9592]

+Ravaniscool thanks

[@Ravaniscool]

No problem man!

[@Brock_Landers]

I liked the look on your face when you matted it. 275/290 are very respectable numbers for a 2.0L turbo engine. I wouldn't have expected it to have that much torque, it has to be part of the variable camshaft timing and ECU tuning. Very good styling but it would be nice if the car was a little lower to the ground.

[@ad356]

+Robert Keeton that is impressive same hp as the 93-95 LT1 cars. my LT1 is a 96 which was a 10 hp increase to 285 hp. the 4 cylinder has decent torque but you still arent matching the 335 ft/lbs of the LT1. the other question is, will these engines have any modding potential or is that maxed out from the factory. the old LT1 can make 350-400 hp fairly easily with the right port job and cam.

[@Shabobin]

"It's nice, deep and wide"

[@Eddie-loves-cars]

epic...

[@amill1563]

I feel like the first part of your reviews are the foreplay to the first acceleration run.

[@thefitnesslife4988]

4 cylinder in american muscle just ain't right.

[@XxDiamond44xX]

Even a 6 cylinder isn't right haha

[@SwishaSilva]

That's why you can still get the V8 option

[@theunknown4772]

What if I told you the very first Camaro was an I-6

[@assassin72]

+Javaris James "Laptops just ain't right.We should only be using typewriters!" "muh feels" "muh noises" "muh purity." I will never understand this logic...

[@built_7.3turboidi34]

+B3rkl3y they've had six cylinders in muscle cars for a LONG time

[@TheDraakheated]

Nice reviews, feels good to see someone enjoying the cars the way you do, ill grab a v6 base, looks more than enough for me! was nice to see all 3 motors reviewed by you!

[@KingSovv]

If you had to decide based on these reviews and not based on your car, would you pick a V6 Camaro or a V6 Stang?

[@MattMaranMotoring]

+Jake Pieper mustang because I like the styling inside and out better.

[@KingSovv]

+subaruwrxfan Yea that's what I was leaning towards as well. I've always been infatuated with the looks of the mustang. My dream car for as long as I could remember.

[@tarmacsmack1301]

+subaruwrxfan is your Ecoboost the Ford 2.0t equivalent? Which is lighter? Camaro or Mustang?

[@KingSovv]

+Mason Criner stang has a lighter curb weight

[@R8RFan007]

+Jake Pieper Wrong, the Camaro is 200lbs lighter than the Mustang Ecoboost

[@Whimsicalchunk]

I wish you released videos more often, I watch them like they are tv shows lol and I've already watch all the episodes

[@TheBanshee17-SS]

All of that extra space in the engine bay..

[@AntLive29]

Noah Preissel good weed hiding spots

[@sam92teg]

Thank you Matt for being the one and only Mustang owner who would give an objective review of the Camaro. I really liked your GTR review and will always keep an eye out for your vids. Would it kill you to take that adorable wife along with you every now and again?

[@MattMaranMotoring]

+Sam Grissom haha thanks Sam. I plan on including her in a couple new videos fairly soon!

[@Keithguinn97]

does anyone else skip to the part in his videos where he turns onto the back roads lmao

[@SteveCJr]

+Keith If you've seen any of his reviews they are all the same. you could mix videos of different cars and it wouldn't matter.

[@condoro63]

I'm a ford guy and own a 14 v6 and don't really like the ecoboost. The exhaust is weak sounding and heavier than this Camaro. But wow, the exhaust note that this turbo 4 has stock and heck even the v6 Camaro wow. Good job Chevy...

[@itsdjmercedes]

American 4 bangers make the ricers feel less ricer...

[@maximus9401]

Man it just makes me so happy that Chevy did the Camaro right for the 6th gen. In nearly all aspects except for visibility. Looks are subjective but I think it looks awesome. The pricing is more than the competition but it does have more to offer as well. Just overall really great

[@zarco773rosales]

i wanna see someone put a bigger turbo and see what it can do!

[@b0bsaget007]

I've heard stories of ATS owners with this engine putting big turbo's and forged pistons making 400 RWHP.

[@issaccaballero3929]

Me being a v6 auto 2016 rs camaro owner is that people will always judge. 2L are awesome if you like it. People who usually say 4 cylinder is depressing are usually the ones driving a 1992 honda. Or some other car. Go with what you like and feel happy with.

[@jc06gsxr600]

which sounded meaner and burly. his voice or that 4 banger? i cant decide

[@Always_Never]

haha

[@AvgrSteven22]

Good job on GM! I like the way it sounds and the blue looks so good! Good work on the review!

[@sonikibk]

What's a muscle car doing with a little 2.0L turbo?

[@custommotor]

+johnny O. everybody is trying to do fuel economy nowadays. IF you think about it though it still has more hp than any 3rd gen and any 4th gen camaro aside from the ls1 4th gen stock. It's not a bad power output and you can cruise with decent mpg.

[@deebo4271]

4 banger and a turbo.......Seriously?!?!?! (like a 6 cyl wasn't bad enough in what's suppose to be a muscle car) I guess they're trying to break into the import/tuner crowd. Might as well throw on some 24's, a Big ass wing and a Fart cannon exhaust while their at it.

[@custommotor]

DeeBo They are trying to get a bigger crowd interested in the car. If they only offered a huge engined high performance car then this would be dead like the old camaro. Not everybody wants a 6.2L engine. Why the hate on a 6 cyl or 4cyl? I have a e46 m3 with a 3.2L I6 but when it came out it could easily spank a 5.7L chevy that had more cubes but less power. It is as fast 0-60 as a 5th gen camaro when they came out in 2010. Give it some time and I can promise someone with tune the I4 and put on a bigger turbo + intercooler and make more hp than the v8 @455.

[@anar7464]

+DeeBo 6 cylinders were always in muscle cars.Why don't you get an education ya dumbfuck. If it wasn't for the V6 cars we wouldn't have our v8's. But from your statement you clearly have no education to see how a business works or consumer needs.

[@custommotor]

***** Also to add they have to build I4 and v6 muscle cars nowadays. Car manufactures have to meet a certain mpg average for their whole line up. So, for every 2 or 3 people that buy a v6 or i4 they allow your v8 to be made.

[@Dancinitup]

Just thought I would make a correction to some of the post below. The Eco boost is a Ford turbo not a Chevrolet. I use to work for a Chevy Dealership. My favorite car was the Chevy SS. wish I had one. great 4 door sleeper.

[@stealthhoneybadger4695]

4 cylinder Camaro, Most expensive way to come out of the closet

[@SpeedResearchLabs]

😂😂😂

[@Beanjuice]

+Stealth HoneyBadger V8's, even more expensive way to compensate for small packages.

[@sean70729]

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

[@Beanjuice]

mysock351C The funny thing is that since this is the baseline Camaro you should expect more "17 yr old girl's" driving these as well. I see them all the time in current models already.

[@Beanjuice]

***** Same difference.

[@mrkongsimr]

Hallo Matt , is there much difference in how snug you are in the driver seat in this one and the Mustang ? I know you had the Mustang , do you still like it better ?? Thanks

[@andrewchristianson2086]

And here I thought the 2.0L Turbo Camaro was weak. 295lbft torque ain't bad.. 15lbft more than the base Mustang. Torque is speed while horsepower is stamina, so the base Mustang will beat this thing up a hill. Still pretty impressive.

[@ertren6]

wrong, torque is acceleration while horsepower is speed. there is a difference between being fast and being quick

[@VPoje]

+Andrew Christianson V6 mustang is realy a base car made for Rental fleet. The 2.0 Camaro is basicly a cheaper/lighter ATS. Its a great car and with just 500$ you can have a tune that will bring it to 300hp + 330lbs of torque.

[@andrewchristianson2086]

ertren6 Acceleration is speed. Stamina is lasting strength.. power such as necessary for climbing hills or towing. Cross reference at dictionary.com. It'll tell you

[@VPoje]

You should try a recent Turbo car, you'll like it. The effortless surge of Torque you get at low rpm is perfect for daily driving. As for smoothness and reliability, that's a case by case thing, but the 2.0 in the Camaro is a good one.

[@TheSigbreaker]

thank you for reviewing the camaro that everyone is buying

[@invertedpolarity6890]

Visibility is awful. You feel like you are riding in a tank looking out through a tiny slit.

[@harryguy76]

+Shane Broussard You only really need to see what is in front of you.

[@dapro2524]

+Shane Broussard Looks amazing compared to your old ass outdated Pontiac , hahaha

[@MobilGamerX]

+Gucci Mane shots fired lmao

[@mrmidnight32]

I love how ever since this guy hung out with dude in blue all his videos are almost exact copy shots/intro as Davids.

[@edgarroldan63]

nice review! hopefully you get the review one of the big boys. zl1 or ss

[@MattMaranMotoring]

+Edgar Roldan thanks! hoping to do a ZL1 once they're available. Already did the SS.

[@Royalcrimsonstang]

+subaruwrxfan great review Matt!

[@edgarroldan63]

subaruwrxfan damn didnt notice. Ima go check it out!

[@demianreith8719]

He already reviewed an SS. Look it up. 😎

[@demianreith8719]

+subaruwrxfan After the Renegade review, you can review another Camaro, like the 1LE models, if you have the chance. 🙂 Other cars you review as requested or not should make you keep up the great work. I LOVE IT! 😎

[@ismaelramirez666]

I just went a got a v4 2017 convertible blck looks really good drives really good , I drive 90 miles back and forward to work , I was gonna get the SS but it only does from 10 to 14 mpg🤑 This camaro v4 on cruise control does from 20 to 30 mpg and it is plenty of speed from 0,-60 in 5.5s .

[@chriscapaccio4342]

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my muscle car to sound like a vacuum cleaner.

[@JimJones-zc9mk]

Mr. Clean likes his cars to sound like a vacuum cleaner.

[@BrawndoQC]

You've come a long way since your early reviews man. Keep it up :) and that's coming from a 2015 Mustang GT owner. I like the Camaro.

[@vvysoc]

Well thats emasculating, 2.0L in a Camaro.

[@TheAntiBully]

LOL

[@hoghogwild]

+vyso Yet will out accelerate any fuel injected Camaro from 1992 on back and is only a tenth or so 0-60 behind the 92-97 LT1 and 98-02 LS1 F bodies. Lotsa potential in that 2.0, but the LT4 in the GEN 6 ZL1 will be so much better.

[@muscleandimports]

+hoghogwild buddy...that 2.0 turbo is NOWHERE near an LS1 F body

[@hoghogwild]

+Drew H GM published 5.2seconds 0-60 times for the 1998 LS1 Camaro. The 1/4 miles times/speeds wouldn't be close.

[@Bartonovich52]

Same HP as the LT1 in the 1990s Camaros and only 40 less lb ft of torque which is offset by lighter weight. Not too shabby for an engine just over 1/3 the displacement. 0-60 times are pretty close... favouring the four banger.

[@NemesisDigitalMedia]

I cant wait till Matt reviews mine!

[@lcameeno1]

penis

[@KingWillie76]

+Dat1Nigga ZimDoe No sack

[@lcameeno1]

KingWillie76 no tip

[@thugajay8]

4 Cylinder engine and Camaro doesn't belong in the same sentence.

[@condoro63]

Let's check out this back road here... Plants foot down... Whoa this thing is fast

[@jonskaggs4589]

Normal camaros? Aren't they all camaros, just different engines? lol

[@aloradawn6929]

For someone who doesn’t really care about speed and ‘racing’ just enjoys the bodies and style of the Camaro’s is it worth it?

[@carlitoxb110]

4 cylinder? A camaro Turbo? Automatic only?

[@03canadianf5]

+Carlitox b Manual trans is standard equipment. Automatic is optional.

[@Lance4123]

I got the RS same color. I love it! Best car I ever had. I got the v6 I’m going to the v8 next time around.

[@moparlover1968rr]

Not bad, as fast as the '95 Z28

[@ad356]

+Thomas Kimble i have a 1996 Z28 which has the LT1, it's 10 more hp then the '95 z28. i know my car has some punch left in it, i bet that the old school LT1 will still beat it out on top end. one category these new 4 cylinder turbos will never beat it in, exhaust note. the LT1 is still very pleasing to the ear. it sounds awesome. you cant really argue with the bargin of the LT1 4th gens, they still offer really good performance for around $4k. oh, and the t tops havent been an option since 2002. t tops rock i do love my 1996 Z28

[@BIGFUPES312]

The quality of your videos are excellent keep it up!