Review | 2017 Lexus CT200h | Eco Hatch with Flair

[@dgurevich1]

Honestly, I'll take mechanical and electric engineering over infotainment software any day.

[@renatohuber2148]

so true. Since we all have smartphones, the integrated systems fall behind often anyways.

[@belabranca9]

then, I guess this is a car for you

[@dgurevich1]

@renewer At the rate they break these days, yes. I do believe majority of modern cars have mechanical and electrical bits, but they are far from engineered.

[@truantray]

@renewer LOL..try owning a BMW after warranty, the "engineering" is to cost savings, more and more plastic and CAD to customer with no road testing. The new era of Chinese transmissions is upon us, which basically put Ford out of the car business. Now they just make vehicles for fat people.

[@miloslogic]

@renewer let me help you understand by directing you to this video - kzbin.info/www/bejne/l2mviIivnaiCns0

[@tbirdboy]

Owner of a 2011 CT. With its specific purpose it is an awesome car. And its powertrain is bulletproof. You won't be doing 14 second quarters and you will get smoked by Civics and Sentras (trust me on that) but it sure looks good and I average 44-46 mpg.

[@MikeDiCiero]

hows your battery pack holding out ?

[@MrFalken91]

@@MikeDiCiero I got a 2011 CT with 90k km on it. I average 61.9-53.46mpg(us) in summer. 51.13 - 45.23mpg(us) in winter. Daily it, driving ~60km a day, some highway and some 80km/h road and some city driving. Live in northern sweden, so ofc driving with real winter tyre. My uncle is a lexus specialist mechanic and he got a lexus rx with over 400k km on it, 09 model. Regular maintenance for me and np. My uncle had one problem with water getting into hybrid battery, so had to close the leak and working well now 50k km later.

[@MikeDiCiero]

@@MrFalken91 - Can you ask your Uncle if he's had or seen many ct200 with ice forming in the intake manifold during the winter ?

[@MrFalken91]

@@MikeDiCiero Sure

[@Jeff.Wilson]

@@MrFalken91 So did you ask? :) What's the answer?

[@TofuProductionCinema]

I love my CT200h for my daily, perfect commuter car, people say it's slow, it's not meant to be fast. I think the price point and the features and reliability involved, it is an excellent choice.

[@TofuProductionCinema]

By the way, I just noticed you filmed this in illinois, where I am from. Do you mind letting me the know location? Perhaps one day you can review my 2012 F sport special edition or my s2000 as well.

[@EZee213]

@@TofuProductionCinema People always complaining about how slow the car is. Speed is obviously not why you buy this particular car. I wanted something economical while not looking ugly. And the sport mode gives me enough pep to do the passing I need. Also, you can find great deals on used CTs. A low mileage Lexus - no matter the year - is basically like new.

[@TofuProductionCinema]

EeeeZeee agreed. Unfortunately I sold my CT last year. But I stayed in the Lexus family.

[@stephaniecoloma8125]

@@TofuProductionCinema Why did you sell it? Did you trade it in for a better lexus?

[@TofuProductionCinema]

Tiffany Garcia I did. It was a startling contrast, I purchased a LS460. Ive referred many friends and coworkers to the CT and after purchase, they still love it to this day. I went with the LS for more room and s few other amenities- but honestly I may be selling my LS soon.. as I truly want the UX hybrid f sport.

[@mooreav]

The homoerotic 80's stuff with Turbowski is amazing!

[@ChesterFoster]

I drive 25 miles to work one way and I cruise at 80-85 Miles Per hour and my CT is great. Love this car and sport mode is AMAZING!!!!

[@Toyota4Life]

I love the CT. I think it's one of the best looking small hatchbacks. They should make a AWD F performance model

[@Trades46]

It's an aggressive looking thing, something my sister also agrees. However we both also agree the powertrain and its looks aren't that corresponding to each other. Still the sad bit is the CT will be going away after 2017 with its replacement (likely based off the new UX concept car) which is derived from the Toyota CH-R which is more a wee-SUV than a hatchback. Also given its size I'm not holding out on a performance variant with more than 200hp.

[@mohamedbadarny4511]

Toyota4Life or they should put the new 2.0 turbo in it

[@samueltan2148]

It really deserves a more powerful powertrain. I will be super happy if Lexus make a performance hatch out of the CT.

[@joshk333]

So agree. Every time I see one on the road I think they are great looking.

[@user-os8sq3uh4n]

Corolla Hatchback is the replacement imo.

[@The1andonlyification]

Your condescending and facetious conversation in the garage is perfect. This is how my friends and I talk and I enjoy It more and more each vid while actually learning something.

[@AnontheGOAT]

The 200 in CT200H denotes that it makes power of an typical 2.0 liter engine.

[@eVerProductions1]

I’m so glad you mentioned the double wishbone rear suspension cause turbowski like all the big car people don’t understand a little hybrid like this usually knows the demographic doesn’t care about that, they just want a comfortable gas saver

[@matusknives]

This video actually really made me interested in this car. Looks well laid out for a daily commuter with that touch if more comfort and luxury and a great mpg.

[@Momo_8k]

I have one and I love it for all the reasons you mentioned. It's a great compliment if you already have a fun, gas guzzler car

[@PanaMaJwaaRd]

Im driving mine into the ground, then buying it again. its amazing.

[@AM-bw7hv]

I love my ct200. It has great aerodynamics. It does well in rain and curves. It's the coolest hatchback ever made....

[@ravipeiris4388]

I don't know why but I think the style and shape just looks sexy and trendy.

[@Hallowsaw]

Its honestly a fancy hybrid toyota matrix. And that is essentially an indestructible car

[@kenzicake3696]

@@Hallowsaw yup I had a 2003 Toyota Matrix and got this CT bc it looks related

[@Slowcarfastbeans]

It is a nice looking chassis. The crease in the rear door leading back to the rear wheel arch is of cosmetic interest.

[@Davidnz]

Yeah, like I can do 0 - 60 in 5 seconds in my street when it's full of traffic. It's always full of traffic, I live in the city! What do I need a fast car for? So I can drive faster into the back of the car in front of me? This car is primarily a hatchback designed for city driving. Why is it so hard to get that? And if you want a hybrid, a hatchback and a bit of luxury as you drive around the city, what else are you going to buy?

[@savagegeese]

+David NZ Its something to note, car is slow thats it. Like you said, if you are ok with it and need it for grinds or city you are going to love MPG for sure.

[@tomk2409]

Test drove this car a week ago and it was amazing. In Sport and Normal mode I never once thought I needed more power and the 134 horsepower feels like 200 to me. It is a damn good car, all I can say is go test drive it yourself.

[@crisissocoylike]

Clvmind I live in city suburbs. I rarely get on the highway. Most of my driving is on roads that have a speed limit around 30 MPH. So, I'd love to have a hybrid...

[@davidmaglioli7048]

its because you should expect a bit more for the asking price. 42k for that F Sport version. It also cheapens the F Sport line its like if Honda slapped Si on the Fit, and only stiffened the suspension. Speaking of Honda the Civic Hatch is actually a better deal. Top trim level of the new civic hatchback is $28k. With that you get pretty much everything this Lexus has and a bit more. Leather, remote start, back up camera, navigation, turbocharged engine. On the CT200H Navi and back up camera are an additional $3,500 option in addition to the $32k base price by the time you option it up to have many of the features the Civic already has on its base $19k trim you're looking at double what a base Civic would cost. In my opinion this car has no place in the market when there are far cheaper alternatives. The only reason anyone would buy this is solely for mpgs, but personally I don't think thats enough.

[@guppy360]

David Maglioli Hondas are gross af

[@Flakey86]

Ha! The 'In the shoppe' segment intro just keeps getting better.

[@scottieray]

This one even had slo-mo Turbowski...if they can do an 80's-style montage next we might be "Better Off Dead"

[@tomk2409]

Lol, I feel like I am the only one that actually liked this car but then again I went in with poor expectations. Performance seemed enough to me, felt like a 200HP car.

[@ScottDreyfus]

5 yrs later it's a real nice 12 to 15k car.

[@benjaminkessler8169]

my mom just got her 2019 and i love to drive it. i might consider getting one myself. driving 140 miles per day its a non brainer to go Hybird

[@CarsofGlasgow]

My dad got a 2019 too, its lovely isnt it!

[@chlehqls]

dat Turbowski montage... I...I can't look away

[@tonyjohnson9048]

I’m so mad they discontinued this model for the US. About to graduate college and was looking forward to buy the 2017 f sport or the 2018 sport when it came out ):

[@truantray]

Americans didn't buy them. Small cars are dissappearing in the US market.

[@Istroops]

Owner of CT 200 h. I have the car for 11 years , 138 000 miles. 55-61 mpg if I drive smoothly with heavy gas pedal. Extremely reliable . Service once a year only in Lexus. Highly recommend for daily commute.

[@kelly00000111111]

turbowski is going to be fighting off the ladies after they see that new intro.

[@Rjhs001]

Gotta say, I've had one for a couple of months now and I have never...and I mean never, felt the brake pedal bottom out. The braking feel is really good.

[@H.Ali_08]

Finally a decent review of such an underrated car. I purchased a standard CT200 (2020 model) and honestly it is absolutely superb. The bad press about it being slow is a myth. Admittedly, when I went to the showroom it was for an older CT200 model and I was extremely underwhelmed by the lack of acceleration when I took it for a test drive. I happened to see another Lexus CT200 (4k above what I was looking at); it was a 2020 model and caught my eye. I took it for test drive and was very, very impressed. I purchased it and haven't looked back since. The acceleration (especially in Sport mode) is more than sufficient. What is most impressive of all is to have a 1.8 L engine that is economical on fuel consumption is very satisfying. My advice is try to go for a model of CT200 post-2015 if possible.

[@shakke52]

It’s crazy how far this channel has come.

[@seanlester514]

So - there is a reason these cars run for 300,000 miles - the NiMH batteries are recyclable - so by the time you get the running cost of a regular car, that dies somewhere around 130-150,000 miles and has to be replaced - REALLY? A problem??? come on - all taxis in NYC are Prius's - for a reason. Next stop is full electric. this thing is a dream.I've owned 50 vehicles, from rare Alfa's to whatever, - performance IS NOT just about speed. The handling on this car is superb, and I've NEVER bottomed out on the brakes - and I drive hard. It is solid at 100 mph as it is at 30 mph. I live on Maui on a twisty windy road and it is a blast to drive - as good as anything I have ever owned. This guy is a downer with his way of perceiving this car. Try one - and enjoy. PS - I drive AT SPEED - 80 to 90 plus every day with this car. I own a 2012 with 158,000 miles on it and going strong.And JUST replaced the brakes.

[@lolsmol]

I'm looking at one, and your comment makes me want it even more. I have a '14 Sentra, and it's also slow. It's not premium, and it doesn't give me the good gas mileage either (relative, it's giving me 34.8 mpgs)

[@user-os8sq3uh4n]

Sounds like highway driving. If you like driving 75-80, you won't do much better with this. I get 36-38 when I drive like an ass on the interstate.

[@sardororipov1302]

finally real car guy here. Sport its not only about 0-60, bhp or engien size. Handling whats makes sport car vs drag car. Porsche is famous for it and I love my lexus ct200h as much as I love my porsche

[@joshk333]

This car is such a conundrum for me. When I see them on the road I think they are really really sharp looking. I do 90% of my driving in town so of course the fuel efficiency would be great as well. The downside being the lackluster driving experience. Sounds like the F Sport option may help the roundabouts and back roads be a bit more enjoyable, but everything else is just so blah. Such a shame because I really really like the exterior looks.

[@orkanlee]

Dude the camera work and the music is amazing and this could easily be shown on TV as a commercial and none would be the wiser.

[@hectorlaureano2142]

Ours is a 2015 and still giving us 47.7mpg overall. Some tanks 50.6. Very practical!

[@kenzicake3696]

I don’t get good mileage with mine for some reason. I get the same mileage as my 2003 Toyota Matrix. My CT is 2017.

[@john-wo4rv]

@@kenzicake3696 is it new?

[@kenzicake3696]

@@john-wo4rv yes I got it at 24k miles. I’m on the highway a good bit of the time but still

[@Michael0697]

savagegeese *slightly annoyed*: "No, they don't have it in oh-rahnge..."

[@Michael0697]

Lol 1:05

[@bradwhidden569]

He nails it although by switching to "Sport" mode it does change the steering feel and the TPS is way more sensitive. The CT is a luxury gas sipper that adds sporty looks and Lexus quality to a commuter car

[@jacksheneman6242]

tbh its slow but not as slow as i thought

[@jacksheneman6242]

@@Romaine_ yeah ive had my fair share of quick cars and ofc my car would gap tf outta this but it would still be able to merge just fine and cruise comfortably at 90, thats the point of the car cuz its not a sports car, it does what it meant to do well

[@pragerugrad656]

Turbo looks so out of place standing next to this car. Absolute King

[@jayduke3373]

The chemistry between these two is really what made this channel.

[@joeyncsu]

I come to every video now just for the Turbowski intros, I feel slightly uncomfortable in a good way when he looks into my eyes.

[@jj481012]

For whatever reason, the shop bits were hilarious to me. The subtle pauses and soft speaking compared to some of your newer videos is so funny.

[@scottneaves3487]

Man I love these old Turbowski videos they're hilarious

[@NevardoCortezLobo]

Did they ever say why they parted ways?

[@emgee44]

I’m impressed. Gotta be the first no nonsense (well not gushy anyway), but equally technical review of this car AND you didn’t pull any punches, pretty well summed up what some other reviewers have said and covered areas that most don’t even bother with.Nice 👍 Liked the title intro btw.👍👍

[@Hallowsaw]

Guys its a fancy hybrid toyota matrix, shits gonna be bulletproof

[@sdlausen1]

Silver color today is like the beige of the 90s.

[@ProbeGT2]

Wow, your videos have come a looooong way!

[@TheMetaldudeX]

I think this is such a good looking hatch. I just wish they made a non hybrid version.

[@RadekPogoda]

Just bought one. I drive a lot in city traffic and some long-distance trips on speed limited highways. Should fit my needs perfectly. Thanks for the rant about the car.

[@cls63amgwagon34]

If they had a sportier version I'd get it once they do a refresh or something

[@SNKFA]

Best review on the CT that I've seen. Very helpful insights. Thank you!

[@airdrummond241]

Does this Scott guy really work on cars? Hopefully never mine.

[@richardshiggins704]

Honesty review which clearly defines the pros and cons of the car and the target clientele . The big selling point as with any Japanese car is the 100pc reliability .

[@joetarrant99]

Beautiful video as usual, Mr. Goose.

[@givemeajackson]

i think it's a really good looking hatchback

[@Bashismus]

turbowski intro rules!

[@toms_garage]

My dad had a 2019 Ct 200h, great reliable and economical car. Only negative is the harsh ride

[@stevenhearnden6103]

The F Sport ride is the real problem.

[@joey86bu1]

God I love going through your older vids.

[@creekhed697]

The "In The Shop with Turbowski " intro's are always my fav! lol

[@trevorhsu6357]

the saved fuel over the life of the car significant offsets the environmental impact of producing the nickel metal hydrate battery. all the studies that suggest otherwise (like that rediculous one that said a hummer is more environmentally friend) have been proven wrong over and over again

[@user-os8sq3uh4n]

It's like the climate deniers and actually mostly the same people. And here it is presented as if it is just as valid an opinion as yours, 50-50. It's not.

[@Slowcarfastbeans]

Slow wit Scott’s head is the fulcrum for introducing components on the car as talking points...at least I hope.

[@mannyrosado9887]

It look like this two gentlemen don't get alone and the energy is dreadful. Not what I was expecting from this team.

[@mexicanhalloween]

Turbowski's eyes go right for moose knuckles too, ya dig. Speaking of which, those intros get better every time.

[@rastone808]

Your electric green shoe laces have more charge than this hybrid 😆. You guys are awesome and love every video. Keep up the hard work!

[@mBaggins]

Such a nice looking car. I'm 25 years of age, and would seriously consider one of these if only they had about 200bhp and a better transmission

[@Shadow-lq7rx]

Bro this is my favorite video of yours. Honestly the best. Best comedy, sarcasm etc. also I own the car. Lmao

[@cruzer6181]

Strange video, no beauty shots like usual in the beginning. Love the Turbowski intro streak is going and alive! 2017 Civic video will go down as the first and best Turbowski intro! Interesting dialogue on the batteries too.

[@user-os8sq3uh4n]

It's the video form of a snub.

[@larsinteriors9348]

enjoy the reviews and the dry as sheet rock humor

[@carcrazysammy]

You could do a review of a Dodge K-car and I would watch it. Love your sense of humor.

[@snpagy]

owner of 12 ct200h; review is very good and captures the pros and cons. would only add winter driving has been ok for me in canada; with winter tires the weight of the car is stable.

[@arturcondebr]

The "200" in the name Lexus CT 200h refers to the engine cubic capacity and the power of the vehicle's hybrid system. In the case of the CT 200h, the number suggests that the car has an engine measuring approximately 2.0 liters (or 2000 cm³), which is a common way of naming vehicles from Lexus and Toyota. Additional Details: The CT 200h is equipped with a 1.8-liter gasoline engine, which, when combined with the electric motor, results in a total system output of around 134 hp (horsepower). While the number "200" does not directly correspond to the exact engine capacity, it is part of the brand's naming convention to indicate the vehicle's type and position within the lineup. This type of nomenclature is common in the automotive industry and helps to identify the characteristics and positioning of the car in relation to other models of the brand. In short, the "200" in the Lexus CT 200h name is part of the brand's naming strategy, indicating a relationship with engine cubic capacity and power, even if it doesn't exactly match the specifications of the actual engine.

[@KidLofi]

Nice to see Illinois 💪🏽

[@Beanjuice]

Why lexus hasn't slapped a 200-250hp i4 turbo in it is beyond me.

[@ChunkyChipz]

CAFE Standards

[@Trades46]

The IS and GS weren't designed with the 2.0 liter 8AR turbo in mind either, but shoehorned in during their mid-cycle refresh replacing the thirsty & under-powered 2.5 liter 4GR V6. My guess is the CT was meant to be an experiment at targeting Audi A3 & Mercedes CLA buyers. Obviously with the market shifting towards small SUVs (sigh), Lexus already decided the CT replacement would be closer to a shrunken NX than another compact hatchback. Considering the engineering cost to put the 8AR into the CT, Lexus just decided to not even bother and use that money to develop the upcoming successor based on the Toyota C-HR.

[@mattmolloy636]

Trades46 oh yeah? When are they going to drop the CT from the line up?

[@Trades46]

matt molloy From what I heard, either 2018 or 2019. I'm not holding my breath, I don't even like these new wee-SUV anyways.

[@Beanjuice]

Heyu Yoma You act like I'm somehow talking shit about Lexus. I love Toyota/Lexus, but lets face it. Lexus has yet to make a hothatch and it's bothersome when one considers BMW, Audi and Mercedes have one. Ford, Honda and VW are even helping themselves to a slice of that hothatch pie

[@briansundayatc]

I love the reviews as always, but if you could have a video someday with a "Best of Turbowski" video montage that would be greeaaaaat. Lol

[@scarboy6693]

Oh That Infotainment.... I had a 2014 IS350 for 2 1/2 years and I loved everything minus that infotainment... it just got to the point where I left the thing on Bluetooth Audio and just mounted my phone to the vent and used it for navigation and as my "head unit" instead. Now I have a 2016 VW with their new infotainment that has Carplay and Android Auto too and it feels 10 years ahead of the Lexus's. Even without the phone connection its so much better

[@daygeckoarthawaii1360]

Is it true that mining and refining nickel is worse for the environment than lithium? I haven't heard that anywhere else... The anti-electric and anti-hybrid people always complain about the impacts of lithium mining.

[@gsheverything_2716]

PLEASE PLEASE DO A REVIEW ON A USED LEXUS ISF, I LOVE YOUR REVIEW MAN AND TURBOW IS REALLY FUNNY LOL

[@ridletta9]

I love my CT200h I live in London, in town driving I get around 46-48mpg. on motorways the average is 61-66 mpg, a totally reliable car.

[@NethirOsman]

How is the rear seating

[@stevenhearnden6103]

​@@NethirOsman mines fine, I'm 6 foot tall and comfortable in the back.

[@NethirOsman]

Thanks for letting me know, what year did you have?@@stevenhearnden6103

[@samueltan2148]

The reason why they brand this car as a "200h" because the 1.8l engine + electric motor output is similiar to a 2 litre car

[@Trades46]

Weber state University YT channel ran by Professor Kelly is arguably the most detail transmission dissection and informative videos around, check him out if you're a gearhead. I've driven this car myself and I liked the experience; it handles well, looks cool in F-sport trim, interior is top notch Lexus quality & compact size makes it easy to see out of. It gets amazing fuel economy but the biggest downside is also the fact its powertrain is sourced directly from the Prius. Passing takes patience when you are alone, but when you sit 4 adults and at highway speeds, forget it. I would have brought this car if it had ~200hp, e.g. if Lexus would have took the 2.5 liter Hybrid engine from the Camry Hybrid instead of the Prius. I love hybrid powertrains, especially since VW proven diesels is not the solution. However as the Accord Hybrid and Fusion Hybrid have shown performance doesn't have to be sacrificed for efficiency and the CT200h doesn't do that well. I wanted to like the CT200h; but its meager performance trade-off for efficiency leaves me cold.

[@cdsmith1990]

On the infotainment - I've just test driven a CT200h Executive Edition and it looks like they've updated the infotainment system since this review was made. The little 'mouse' that navigates around the display is now a fixed wheel like most German cars, and the display and menus themselves seem to be updated. I must say I like it, I currently have a 2014 Mini which uses a version of the iDrive system from BMW which is frankly brilliant, and to be fair the Lexus system I tested didn't feel too far behind that. Overall I really liked the car, I think I'm going to put an order in.

[@chadmonroe4145]

Appreciate you’re being blunt. I am considering a discontinued Lexus product Obviously they do not depreciate compared to others but they are so reliable. I’m frustrated with toss a way vehicles.

[@herbyverstink]

just another fantastiCT200h video

[@stephen3164]

"Why 200?" - from what I've seen, Lexus uses the engine displacement in the model name - EXCEPT in the hybrids. For those, it appears they use the "equivalent displacement" for the hp. So a 1.8l with a hybrid motor might be called a 200, just like their RX400h had a 3.3l (?) engine.

[@HikaruSorano05]

It's for the torque.

[@nightdonutstudio]

My friend has this car. Our friends who have sit in the rear seats all complain about the limited head room. It has great rear legroom but headroom is poor.

[@FlyinGato]

The world needs more Turbowski

[@FasterThanSoup]

Nope. Still not tired of "flairful" Turbowski intro. I see you even changed it up a little - goes well with the yellow air pig(?) man handling shot.

[@benjaminkessler8169]

not gonna lie, Scott is a hot cookie

[@10tenman10]

Keep them coming. Enjoy these reviews.

[@braaaaaaaaaaap]

"That's a ride height sensor" haha...We need more Scott

[@goons123flofy]

Shit goose, you could review a minivan and I would tune in.

[@jimknobbe6369]

Noticing you're in my neighborhood in Woodstock, Bull Valley! Great video of my CT200, I love mine!

[@nodak81]

These are also great for people who want to drive a Prius but don't want the stigma of being seen doing so, most people won't recognize it as a glorified Prius.

[@user-os8sq3uh4n]

Well...also...it isn't. It's a different chassis, different suspension, different body, everything except what's under the hood. When does that ever make 2 cars the same car?

[@shakilnasir3829]

Thanks guys , really great detailed information about this car , probably my next car will be Lexus.

[@screamingsaint]

Lexus has a larger number than the engine size because of the hybrid part giving it an added “boost” to what the engine by itself would be. The GS450h has a smaller sized 3.5L V6 engine and the LS600h has a 5.0L V8. That is just how they designate their hybrids.

[@raydon14ify]

See that's what I like about savagegeese, they keep it real

[@antonioalvarado1541]

As a Hatchback lover looking to save more on gas, I was highly considering this car. I drive a 2003 Mazda Protege 5 and I'm looking to get a newer car. Based on what I saw/heard here, I don't like that brake feeling. This would be my car for everything (not just a commuter!), so that means that I'm planning on going 70mph or a little above that on the hwy! What killed me was the cargo space. My current car has 19.8 ft3/38.2(rear seats down) ft3 of cargo...this car has 14.3 ft3/34.8(rear seats down) ft3!!! I'd be loosing cargo space in both configurations. It's sad to see companies are always falling short on 2, 3 or more aspects in their car design. They can never get it right in an over-all decent kind of way...>>>What's up with the "How to get rid of Hemorrhoids" and "Hemorrhoid Talk" @ 17:15 LOL!!!

[@user-os8sq3uh4n]

Stopping power is amazing regardless of feel. I had a dude brake check me because I road raged a bit after he was following me with brights on and I have no idea how it stopped so quickly. Good tires mostly but I think the rigid frame played a part. No skid.

[@antonioalvarado1541]

@@user-os8sq3uh4n Good to know. Thanks so much for this input.

[@cloudforest4087]

A mouse cut the wire, Turbowski?

[@missbehavin8673]

Owner of a 2011 CT and 2011 CTS-V. Most try to race me in my CT? Makes no sense, right? I just smile at them and let them go on their merry way.

[@mrelectric4577]

The infotainment display: "How to Get Rid of Hemorrhoids..." Lol

[@MKirloj]

Really liked this review :)

[@garysmith6994]

Entertaining and solid review

[@freepadz6241]

Great vid as always. keep em coming.

[@andrewtasch2299]

The 200 comes from the engine/motor configuration equate to a 2.0L normally aspirated engine. At least that’s what I read from Lexus.

[@howardkerr8174]

BTW, I believe when Toyota/Lexus names a car that has a gasoline only and a gasoline/electric version (this car is sold in Europe as gasoline only in some markets I believe) the model name comes from the performance the engine the hybrid version produces. This engine performs nearly as well as a 2 liter gas only. Either that, or they just round up to next number? As in LS460 becomes LS500h.

[@rondhole]

It is practically Corolla IM plattorm with Prius powertrain. Almost 90% suspension components are identical to Corolla IM

[@s50201]

"Do you have to plug that into USB-C too?" LOL

[@vivefree]

You should do a v6 challenger or small size trucks