Best New Features in Revit 2025

[@ElectricRob]

Hey Nick - thanks for covering these updates - glad the Architects get some love in this one. I covered the Electrical updates and I'm a bit underwhelmed.

[@archit3ch]

Is there any way to reformat your last slides as the end cards make them hard to read? Great summary video as always Nicolas! Very excited for sheet collections and the alignment tools.

[@KimHmrs]

This may just be the most underwhelming Revit relsease to date.

[@alishrih]

autodesk might as well call this 2024.3 and save us the hassle of a full version upgrade.

[@wreakerofhavoc]

Could not agree more. Especially the 24.3 patch comment. Essentially you are paying two years of subscription fees for the same product.

[@MilosCsrb]

Really disappointed, and showing MEP fabrication down our throat instead native elements is bullshit, fix god damn pipe insulation graphics

[@Constantinesis]

Don't they usually do like this? I mean make major improvements only every two releases and not each time? Graphisoft Archicad used to do this. Anyway I thought the new toposolid improvements are a major thing that was well requested but I read somewhere that the Cut Fill volume calculation are still broken if you slice them. Can anyone confirm this?

[@rik0904]

@@Constantinesis last major improvements that i remember was in 2017. What new in Revit 2025 is fixing bugs. But not bugs in api, god forbid for theme to do anything ablaut it. 6 years waiting for fix a crucial bug with connectors, but no they will add 0 array.

[@SmitBangare-p2r]

Excited for Visual Studio Code IDE integration ;)

[@MegaToyy]

Lol just checked the Autodesk stock index dropping by 4%. This is how knew the new Revit version sucked :) PS: btw the concrete design tools have really improved

[@HippieP629]

Sheet collections eh? If handled correctly, fantastic

[@LucasYosukeLeonelFukuda]

How accurate is the excavation solid feature? Does it align with calculating the volume dashboard inside Civil 3D (surfaces comparations)? How about parameterizing topography assemblies, is that possible (ex. 1:5 proportions)?

[@feudsbatch247]

Super hyped !!

[@milosciric7655]

lets goo

[@blueprindesigns]

This is not a new release, its Revit 2024.3 The excavate tool is great if you want to do a mine shaft but thats about it

[@Constantinesis]

Yeah that's how they even marketed in the original video, that you can do tunnels and such. I also wonder how often the majority of architects need that.

[@camaleon9]

I truly hope they allow door scheduling by swing direction. The current workarounds and the need of third-party plugins is nothing but a nightmare!!!

[@brunocschreiber]

Maybe create two families, one for each swing direction, just for make it easier to label? Or even a instance parameter? I know it's not the best workaround but it might work well on small-medium projects. Hahaha

[@damirces]

Have you tried with Dynamo? Works really good.

[@tael6691]

Yes, this is long overdue! You got some terrible suggestions from other commentators with solutions that have enormous flaws where you have to check each and every door direction manually anyway. 😂 Autodesk should just fix this.

[@MartcheSz]

Make a parametric with yes and no, for openings, and add for the scheduling the parametric

[@camaleon9]

@@MartcheSzThere shouldn't be any workarounds for this matter. IMO, this should be part of the family itself. I've tried your solution and, it's not efficient yet, I should be able to filter amounts by left and right (exactly the way you do when scheduling)

[@MrBondarrr]

Напишите им, в таблице нужно срочно обновить фильтрацию, она слишком устарела. Нужно, как в сортировке, хотя бы 8 позиций.

[@taylorwilliamson7853]

The array change is going to be massive, and love the annotation alignment tool integration! But thats about the extent of my excitement... I'm totally not feeling this "sheet collection" addition. Why would you want to have duplicate drawing numbers in a project? This goes against any naming convention on a project I've come across. I plan on sticking with browser organisation, sorted by custom sheet parameters. I can't see us adding this to our package workflow... it just seems too much of a pain to manage, regardless of being able to schedule the collections out! (That being said, I'll be waiting for 2025.2 until I give it a bash!🎉)

[@eastudio-K]

Autodesk customer service and finding someone to talk with is really terrible, but besides that I can’t complain I love using revit mostly, are there any other viable options

[@guillaumebouvard7538]

And still slow unoptimized for 64 bits... low processor or memory usage... it's a shame.

[@johnolmstead1170]

And excavation is buggy. Sloppy work.

[@engineeringworld738]

Hi How are you How can We Activate The crack Of Revit 2024 Please tell

[@Smilemonk5]

How to create level in 2025

[@BIMPWR]

This got to be the worst release EVER. Lazy Autodesk. 😴

[@wreakerofhavoc]

Hardly worth the subscription price justification. How Autodesk has not had an anti-trust suit laid against them is beyond me.

[@bimpure]

Maybe we'll get another open letter from angry architects :)

[@rik0904]

@@bimpure programmers would gladly join, we are waiting 6 years for bug to be fix

[@hiidenwarrior2698]

NO aNTI TRUST BECAUSE: Vanguard Group Inc BlackRock Inc. State Street Corp Loomis Sayles & Co L P Fmr Llc VFINX - Vanguard 500 Index Fund Investor Shares Ninety One UK Ltd Geode Capital Management, Llc Price T Rowe Associates Inc /md/ Aristotle Capital Management

[@DD-eq2bl]

is there a reason why 99% of revit users dont use Massing Features? Just saw ur blog post. haha. Hope u can explain

[@valorvdc6314]

So underwhelmed :(

[@vladvalentinov]

Revit, as a modeling tool for custom 3D objects (couch, chair, other entourage), is in a stone age. While it is possible to model intricate 3D objects in a free software, even web-based ones, like OnShape, Revit didn't change it's approach since V.1: extrusion, blend, revolve, sweep, sweep blend... that's all Revit got? - sad, borderline pathetic. Am I missing something?

[@MelaniaSideWigga]

Make all Autodesk s/ware interface the same way. Also, improve editing of parameters & made selection of items easier: Stop making shite So hard to read! Improve REVIT to be more graphically based & setup for users to modify items: more like how a user interacts w/ AutoCAD, or better yet, ArchiCAD. Or, even better, just use ArchiCAD.

[@leszkensleszkens2785]

stupid total carbon analysis but no stair or railing tool!

[@tael6691]

I hope they ditched the unusable toposolid and reinstated toposurface instead.

[@johnestupin5619]

Same here, working with toposurface and building pad is better

[@tael6691]

​@@johnestupin5619Yeah, working with terrain is impossible now when you can no longer copy- or align points or box select many points at once. The toposurface approach to working with terrain was much better allthough it's flaws. We are still on 2023 because working with terrain is too important to us to upgrade.

[@YotamAshkenazi]

I kinda like the Toposolid. Environment for Revit has some great tools for it :)

[@HO-mi9pj]

We won't buy any Israeli terror** st products​@@YotamAshkenazi

[@tael6691]

​@@YotamAshkenaziHow do you copy points or use the align tool on sweies of points when working with toposolid? Thats right, you cant.

[@jhonnyvaldes3239]

I'm definitely not happy with this update, really, Autodesk? improvements that could have been resolved from previous versions, the only thing I liked is the alignment tools for notes and sheet gruoups,

[@wreakerofhavoc]

And sheet groups were easy to do with a Project Parameter FFS.