Richard Dawkins Slams Gender Theory

Richard Dawkins Slams Gender Theory
Richard Dawkins gives controversial views on J.K. Rowling, Piers Morgan, atheism, gender theory, and evolution.
#richarddawkins #genderequality #genderinequality #inequality #shorts

[@georgesmyrnis1742]

Imagine how insane the subject is that it puts Dawkins and Christians on the same page.

[@ToTheGrave20]

He doesn't agree with them at all lmao. He says he doesnt know and doesnt understand lmao

[@morticiag]

​@@ToTheGrave20 This man has done NOTHING for humanity. He wrote some Novels from his own imagination and you guys are treating this Dork-ins like a DEMIGOD ?? DORK-INS has done NOTHING as a "biologist" and NOTHING for Humanity, and yet the 🦧-people worship him as their leader.....?? WHY ?

[@morticiag]

Christians next to an 🦧-man like Dork-ins ....... Hmmmmm..... No competition. The guy has bananas for brains.

[@JBguitar-cj8pc]

@@ToTheGrave20he said it’s verging on insanity haha what are you laughing your ass off at? 😂

[@serpentsepia6638]

@@JBguitar-cj8pc ToTheGrave20 is showing us that he's on the verge of insanity.

[@USA_UNITED1776]

Cannot believe he lost the humanist of the year award for this

[@ericferre]

Wait really?

[@USA_UNITED1776]

@@ericferre Yes it was revoked for 'bigoted claims'.

[@susanjones7734]

@@ericferreYep. He’s been cancelled for speaking the truth.

[@USA_UNITED1776]

@@zephyr139 yeah tbh you're right but it's sad such a reward is based off of such unimportant things

[@jamesandrews8698]

I agree with him this whole time I've felt like men claiming to be full fledged women is disrespectful to real women. It's also disrespectful to logic to act like biology doesn't exist.

[@valmid5069]

*Dawkins new book should be called The Gender Delusions*

[@jasonsmith4114]

That's actually very clever and good marketing.

[@Jerseyboondocks]

Haha very clever!

[@Catholic_KnightII]

lol

[@morticiag]

This man has done NOTHING for humanity. He wrote some Novels from his own imagination and you guys are treating this Dork-ins like a DEMIGOD ?? DORK-INS has done NOTHING as a "biologist" and NOTHING for Humanity, and yet the 🦧-people worship him as their leader.....?? WHY ?

[@nathancranford6369]

Smooth.

[@lizziemartin2382]

Science with a total lack of ego. I love how down to earth and positively neutral he is. He isn't being offensive. He's a man of research and evidence.

[@ianthomas7863]

Dr Dawkins, speaking the truth. Thankyou. A long standing hero of mine. Scientifically spoken. 👏👏👍👍👌👌

[@morticiag]

What makes him your Hero? Tell me one good thing he's done for the world / mankind?

[@grogeevee]

@@morticiag Educated and opened the minds of mankind. Not even mentioning the many scientific contributions he did. What did you contribute with your neckbeard and cheetos dust covered fingers?

[@Adotp-]

@@morticiag YWNBAW

[@critical_analysis]

​@@morticiagThe good thing he is doing is calling out psychpaths who are hellbent on destroying science. Wokes will ruin the world.

[@delawlol]

​@@morticiagywnbaw

[@superiorbeing8805]

Honestly it makes sense he would try to explain it this way. Hes an evolutionary biologist, obviously hes gonna explain this via a mostly biological perspective

[@NickyM_0]

That's because biology is a factual reality and one that only the deluded deny. The whole trans existence from beginning to end is steeped in biology. What can I tell ya?🙄

[@johnnunn8688]

It’s about biology, simple biology, so yeah of course he is.

[@superiorbeing8805]

@@johnnunn8688 not really, gender and gender identity are largely under sociology and neurochemistry.

[@johnnunn8688]

@@superiorbeing8805 , bolx.

[@Thebeautyofphysics_89-92.]

He speaks truth and he is not afraid of anybody Issues like gender fludity, gender queerness,transgenderism is prodominanty seen in the post mordern society. When a society fulfills its basic needs either it goes towards self actualization or become sexually libreal and sexually libreal society is weak society . Get your family values back or ur society will collapse soon Personally i don't like islam but muslims are kicking your asses and you people deserve it , london is now londonistan and muslim majority cities in US have banned lgbtq flag. Get your values back U idiots

[@josephbriffa120]

Its not verging on insanity, it is insanity.

[@tubian323]

No more insane than thinking an invisible ghost wants you to eat his body and drink his blood.

[@rickybefree]

that was metaphorical speech, but okay ​@@tubian323

[@121music4life]

Dawkins is an intellectual genius. Being asked these stupid questions must be embarrassing

[@gordonhamilton7160]

I agree he is an excellent scientist. I wouldn’t say the question is stupid. The fact that people (including scientists) out there believe these things means that it’s a worthwhile question to put to him. If 50% of society thought he world to be flat, I would want the best science communicators to debunk it as deftly as Dawkins would.

[@ahmedmadeeh4399]

Dawkins is not a excellent scientist

[@Palach624]

​@@ahmedmadeeh4399Some of his papers have been cited individually over 100.000+ times and he wrote multiple best seller biology books. But sure.

[@GwladYrHaf]

@@ahmedmadeeh4399he never has been.

[@notreallydavid]

It's often the job of an interviewer to knowingly ask the dumb or very basic question in order to obtain a smart answer from the interviewee.

[@michaelgaskell2031]

A gentleman whom I respect.

[@douglasfreeman3229]

"Verging on insanity". Richard is so polite. Whadya mean "verging"?

[@theaitravelerofficial]

That's just a british thing

[@ferdinandimposter691]

Well done sir. Compare to Neil Degrasse Tyson's anti-science stance on this. 'Not all atheists are created equal'

[@KickRocks-me7hh]

How is it anti science?

[@Behemoth_Rogue]

Based, as always sir.

[@michellemooresings]

I wanna hear this episode!!

[@Osmanthus373]

Thank you Prof

[@chaosinorder9685]

As a Christian for once, I agree with you, Richard Dawkins

[@drfell9105]

Funny how bigotry really brings people together. Your hatred of trans people trumps your hatred of Richard Dawkins I guess.

[@mina6mina]

well, no wonder. you already believe in one big fairy tale, and now you believe in this other bullshit fairy tale which is transphobia.

[@StanbyMode]

@@drfell9105because they only disagree on matters of religion, not on other matters, or matters of commonsense

[@chaosinorder9685]

@@drfell9105 call me what you want I really don’t care…Richard has no moral obligation to say what he just did but still did. Why? Because he’s a scientist. I do not hate Richard Dawkins I just don’t agree with his atheism. Why do you assume that just because people disagree they therefore hate that’s one of the most asinine things I’ve ever witnessed

[@hank35682]

@@drfell9105 bigotry 😂 if stating factual information is bigotry then I love being a bigot

[@antediluvianatheist5262]

It's called 'being wrong.'

[@oldmangranny5oldmangranny56]

We know that neurochemistry can be out of sync with objective reality. So yeah.

[@MrBendacorna]

❤🎉

[@KickRocks-me7hh]

You're talking garbage.

[@KickRocks-me7hh]

Which chemicals does the brain produce that causes gender identity to be out of sync with reality?

[@Tee-roni]

Even a broken clock can be right every once in a while 😂

[@tengu8560]

The most accurate statement said here was “I don’t know about the topic” at least he a knowledges it. Very profound Richie stay in your area

[@mrcoatsworth429]

I would love to have a conversation with Richard about this topic, because I think his opinion id more nuanced than comes across in many of these interviews. I think if asked, he'd be in support of a, for example, biologically male person saying "I feel like I ought to be a woman". I think his main problem is that, factually, except in very, very rare cases, a person is either biologically male or female. And statements contrary to that are usually incorrect. But it's different in terms of the mental aspects, and I think he recognizes that and would be in support of that person's freedom to fulfill their desire to live as that gender. But I can’t be sure, because the hosts never ask the questions I would be asking.

[@Oysters176]

It's not different in terms of the mental aspects. It's an ego and association thing.

[@Oysters176]

But I only care about the sport issue really when it comes to transitioning.

[@KickRocks-me7hh]

Dawkins and others never engages with anyone with an opposing view.

[@mrcoatsworth429]

@@KickRocks-me7hh this is untrue. There are tons of videos of Dawkins debating people of opposing views on KZbin. So you're either ignorant or lying.

[@neilhawkes880]

If you can persuade people to believe a stupid thing, they will then naturally do terrible things to defend it: a recurring human tragedy. Can we all strive to be nice to each other, as best we can?

[@deanzoet1160]

Truth hurts!

[@KickRocks-me7hh]

No such thing as gender theory or ideology.

[@ProjectCreativityGuy96]

It's a different topic of what I'm about to say here, but I definitely can see WHY Richard Dawkins finds Charles Darwin fascinating and absolutely adores Him as a Scientist and Atheist also, because Mr. Darwin's story is very alike Mr. Dawkins's! 😊

[@Kreepyb5]

Thankyou always for your dedication and content Andrew

[@Kreepyb5]

Glad to see you are doing well and keeping up with pertinent stories while making a big difference! 💯👋thankyou

[@morticiag]

​@@Kreepyb5 How is pushing the Atheist agenda making a big difference?

[@Kreepyb5]

@@morticiag your opinion is absolutely yours. 👋

[@Kreepyb5]

That's exactly the point! Andrew puts content out and We Debate it. Making me personally aware of some Things I didn't know about ☮️bro

[@morticiag]

@@Kreepyb5 When is Richard Dawkins gonna tell you about the 60 million Russians killled by Militant ATHEISTs in Soviet Russia? Or the many more Chinese killled by Militant ATHEIST Mao ? Never. I guess. Will Andrew tell us all about the Dangers of Militant Atheism, I wonder?

[@johnchambers9836]

Well said

[@haroldvonschwartzenstien3581]

How many cuts in this one clip?

[@lilacscentedfushias1852]

I totally agree that if someone isn’t feeling tip top mentally…reach out, there’s always going to be someone online who can help and sometimes easier to talk to someone you don’t & aren’t connected. I’m extremely lucky to have about 20 Twitter friends, all like minded in our fight for reality, the nonsense we’re facing, rights of women & pe*os. We’re a mix of men and women from a few countries

[@susanjones7734]

How to find this Twitter group?

[@Clevelandsteamer324]

Empathy is what makes us human. If someone is devoid of genuine empathy that is an animal.

[@eggheadusa9900]

Not really, humans can ditch that empathy if someone is from a opposing group. Dehumanization is more common then empathy, that’s why wars are so common

[@sphumelelesijadu]

Oh boy🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

[@motivationdestination457]

He is not a bad man at heart, he is a sincere seeker

[@WickedIndigo]

I didn’t see the part where he slams gender theory. He made his opinion clear, which is totally fine. But he didn’t really explain why gender theory is wrong.

[@tabiasprime]

As a person of faith, I don't necessarily agree with everything Richard Dawkins believes, but I'd gladly stand on this hill with him on this subject...he hasn't fallen down the rabbit hole for the pseudoscience of gender theory like so many of his colleagues

[@LaggyMcStab]

Do I think he’s incorrect? Yes. Do I think his award should be revoked because of it? Absolutely not.

[@intercakefederation]

Control alt reverse

[@eggheadusa9900]

Politically incorrect* Bow down or else

[@arigoldberger1755]

I respectively disagree with Dawkins on his position of militant atheism but thank the heavens he is calling out the insanity of transgenderism.

[@mattplayzgamezandstuff8790]

absolutely

[@jessicafrench2538]

I think the Humanist of the Year Awards is politically biased! Richard Dawkins seems to be the voice of reason in so many areas!

[@zah936]

Thank you sir

[@morticiag]

Is he a Sir? Really? What has he done to Deserve such a TITLE?

[@cyclicozone2072]

@@morticiagBe a male adult like yourself 😂

[@morticiag]

@@cyclicozone2072 Then that's Telling of Dorkins, cause I'm a Female..... 😅

[@cyclicozone2072]

@@morticiag Nah you’re a man pretending to be a woman. YWNBAW

[@DellaStreet123]

@@cyclicozone2072 He obviously isn't a "Ma'm".

[@bobhill4364]

Gender theory is an atheist derived theory. This is what happens when you aren't 'dogmatic'.

[@synthWizkid]

We shouldn't have to change facts like they arbitrary "rules". They are FACTS

[@Super-BallSharp]

MAN IT WOULD BE NICE IF HE GAVE AN ACTUAL REASON

[@drewlovelyhell4892]

"Aspects of the brain that are male or female"? The whole brain is either male or female. Perhaps he's trying to ask if their are aspects of the psyche/mind/psychology that are male or female.

[@Limosethe]

Gender fluidity proponent: “You’re so biased!” Me: Agreed! Now allow me to admit my biases to set the tone of honesty we will need moving forward, okie dokie? I’m biased towards explanatory models of reality that: 1.) Are consistent beyond a reasonable doubt, meaning that they can withstand reasonable scrutiny until the end of time while being testable and evidentially substantiated. 2.) Accomplish predictions, meaning they correctly predict any given phenomena or experimental result. 3.) Are simple and compliant with Occam’s Razor, making it efficient at explaining evidence, as a relaxing alternative to the obnoxious inclusion of superfluous nonsense. 4.) Demonstrate optimal flexibility, by remaining subject to revision in light of new evidence while not unfalsifiable. If I can demonstrate that sex is compliant with all three of these rules while gender fluidity isn’t compliant with a single one of them, then I have one the argument having met the standards by which superior explanatory models are separated from the inferior ones, and having proven gender fluidity to be an inferior explanatory model to sex. All discussions about gender roles and masculinity can happen later.

[@eggheadusa9900]

They’ll just ignore your points and twist it, no shocker that the delusional people are delusional

[@David-vo5qs]

To be fair he thinks religious people are also verging on insanity 😂

[@_madame_sene]

Trans ideology is basically a new cult like religion

[@USA_UNITED1776]

This man is so incredibly based.

[@YwY-ct5yq]

​@@USA_UNITED1776I take that as sarcasm??? Just want to clarify

[@USA_UNITED1776]

@@YwY-ct5yq nopedy nope da nope to the nope squared to the power of nope times pi. 100 percent serious

[@Behemoth_Rogue]

I mean, they are tbf.

[@user-bk9fk2tq2z]

I agree with Richard Dawkins here. I think that God exists, but I agree with Richard here. I also know that evolution is a fact. I agree with 99 percent of what Richard Dawkins says.

[@Pyr0Ben]

It's not often I agree with Dawkins wholeheartedly

[@nicoletteralfe733]

Didn’t think I would agree with him on something!

[@GrenvilleP710]

There are 12 sexually diomorphic nuclei in the brain ...so brains are part of the physiological differences

[@gb5584]

His voice is different

[@drsatan7554]

Its called aging

[@gb5584]

@drsatan7554 what else? You idiot 🙄

[@morgan_drui]

Haters gonna hate old man

[@feliscorax]

Ahhh, ageism, the last acceptable bigotry. Tell me your opinion can safely be ignored without telling me to ignore you.

[@eoinoconnor5783]

He laughs their hatred of him off on KZbin.

[@user-fq5kg6gk1g]

❤ Richard Dawkins

[@skyshoesmith6098]

Makes sense that his perspective would come from biology and that the question would target that but they're definitely not talking about trans people lmao

[@angelalisle6914]

Well all I can say is I AM A WOMEN and I’m perfectly sane. The only different that might occur would be as a result of hormones and their influence on emotions - maybe thinking? But then my sexuality is distinctly female though my personality is distinctly androgynous, these called gender fluidity because I’m non-binary and as far as I’m concerned I don’t really believe in gender stereotypical behave and so I don’t exhibit it.

[@2Goiz_1ShanDA]

Did u guys see Dawkins on the Andrew Gold show? "ohh you mean that atheist podcast? I watch him too" 🤣 😜🤙 Ur Awesome bro! No judgement 🙅

[@bethezebra]

Well, damn. When the most hardcore atheist in the world believes the same thing as religious fundamentalists. 🤔😅🎉

[@DellaStreet123]

It just happens to be the truth. If a fundie said we need water and oxygen to live, Richard Dawkins would have to agree as well.

[@3brenm]

Yer and feminists, social democrats, conservatives, homosexuals. What's your point? Sometimes, people agree on things. Most of us agree gravity exists too

[@bethezebra]

@@3brenm "sometimes, people with wildly divergent worldviews believe in the same philosophical/social/political points, even when those points can *seem* to be divisive." That's not exactly the same as gravity, but I see you understood the point and then re-stated it in your own terms. Which makes me wonder what motivated you to ask what the point was when you *seemed* to grasp it. I'll ignore your unprovoked asinine attempt at an insult.

[@LiverPools-ib5fv]

Do you have autism or something? These “atheists” care more about humanity than any religious parasite on the globe. According to religions, this life isn’t real. It’s just a temporary holiday and the real fun begins when you live FOREVER under a dictatorship 🙄

[@hank35682]

If the most hardcore atheist is agreeing with religious fundamentalists then that should be a clear sign that what they are agreeing against is really really REALLY off the fuckin deep end

[@ibme6073]

Life can be so unfair. Oh well….

[@topcomma8218]

The amount of ignorance in this comment section is astounding

[@omp199]

What a useful contribution to the discussion! /s

[@topcomma8218]

@@omp199 Are you just going to make a sarcastic comment or ask why i feel that we and maybe even defend any points made in the video?

[@topcomma8218]

@@omp199 He straight up says that he hasn’t done enough research in the field to fully understand it and yet has the audacity to claim that trans people are insane. Pure hate from someone who hasn’t taken the time to understand the people they they are trying to oppress. Is that a better “useful contribution to the discussion”?

[@omp199]

@@topcomma8218 I made a sarcastic comment because you said nothing of substance. If you criticise "this comment section" for "ignorance" without saying who you think is ignorant, what you think they are ignorant of, or what evidence you might have for thinking that they are ignorant, your comment is entirely pointless. You now post a new comment that begins with the word "he", which is an odd choice of pronoun for "this comment section", so I can only assume that you are veering off your own topic and are now talking about Richard Dawkins. No, that is not a useful contribution to the discussion, because it is simply an exercise in flinging baseless accusations. If you want to make a useful contribution, start by either backing up - or, if you can't back them up, retracting - the claims that you have just made: 1. The claim that Richard Dawkins has said that "trans people are insane"; 2. The claim that Richard Dawkins has "hate" towards "trans people"; 3. The claim that Richard Dawkins is trying to "oppress" people. If I were a betting man, I would bet against your being able to back up _any_ of those claims, but let's see.

[@omp199]

@@topcomma8218 KZbin is at it again. I can't see my own reply. In case you can't see it either, I basically asked you to back up the claims that you just made.

[@Sonofiraq24]

Hey brother you look like al pacino Is he your dad?

[@rexweller3759]

Try looking up sexual dimorphic network. Males and females are different.

[@Cheetahlover]

It’s pathetic they care so much about the “poor cis women” but not anyone else

[@peteconrad2077]

Like whom?

[@Cheetahlover]

@@peteconrad2077 transphobes and terfs

[@peteconrad2077]

@@Cheetahlover why is it pathetic?

[@peteconrad2077]

@@Cheetahlover whom don’t they care about?

[@ReenieG1UK]

Oh like the 6ft butch man who calls himself a woman? How is he even vulnerable?

[@user-pq2nv7lt8n]

What about "I am a MAN"?

[@ElisabeteSuzana]

Lol. I’m not a specialist but I’ll butt in and say such and such hahahaha, how scientific.

[@johnchambers9836]

No he admitted he wasn't an expert then tried to answer with the knowledge he did have The question was are there male and female parts of the brain (there are not) he admitted he wasn't an expert but then said thst thinking a man could be born with a woman's brain isn't true. You don't have to be a neuroscientist to know that

[@johnchambers9836]

@pennysanford7322 not saying trans people dont exist or thst isn't ok. Just saying people can't try to rewrite biology to suit their own needs. The issue is psychological not biological

[@YwY-ct5yq]

It's literally his specialty .. he is a biologist... one of the things , not only they, but everyone does is to identify which among a species is male or female, in humans man or woman... So he is infact very much adept at identifying the most simple of human and living organism traits, which is sex...

[@dingerling9017]

​@pennysanford7322thank god you wrote out your empty platitudes. Very brave and thought provoking. Magnificent performance.

[@cyclicozone2072]

@pennysanford7322No one claims they don’t exist. What a transparent and desperate strawman 😂

[@nathanielwilding3779]

Sexual dymorphoism ? I believe the spelling is.... i believe physiology is different from brain input. I truly believe be you whoever you are or how you feel ect or want to be 🤙

[@laraoneal7284]

Jordan Peterson says there differences between male and female brains but there are similarities too.

[@allytrudie864]

I don’t care what gender a brain is. We divide ourselves up by our sex organs for women’s protection since the beginning of time. I can fully believe a man can have a female brain but that doesn’t mean they are allowed in my single sex female spaces. They also don’t have a say in women’s rights. Women’s rights are women’s rights. Trans men and women need their own rights because they aren’t getting the rights of us.

[@pillsareyummy]

I've read a study in a research journal (Nature), where they placed Transgenders in fMRI scanners and observed certain areas of their brains that appeared to be very similar to the gender they identified as. I believe that's what Dawkins was referring to.

[@mina6mina]

and the cool things is that studies done on transgender brains have all shown that the brains of transgender people resemble the brain of the opposite sex they identify as! and this was on trans people who had no gender reaffirming care done. Stanford professor Robert Sapolsky has done a lecture about it on a channel called Ardra.

[@davidthom7127]

He started off saying, 'I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT'

[@user-ny6so8wb9u]

- which is precisely the kind of honesty you don't find among those who disagree with him....

[@lechenaultia5863]

He is an eminent biologist. When he says he doesn't know much.....he knows perfectly well that sex is binary. Hence the insanity comment.

[@davidthom7127]

@@lechenaultia5863 sex is IRRELEVANT

[@tigre9271]

He's essentially saying there are probably some cross over ASPECTS of gender identity in the psyche of certain people but he's doesn’t know that much about it. But does stand firm that when those certain people claim that they ARE the other gender, he KNOWS it's false and ludicrous. When asked if it was dangerous, i do believe he did not answer the question the interviewer was implying. I believe the interviewer was asking if its dangerous for trans people to claim that they ARE the other sex and if it's dangerous if society placates them. But Dawkins answers that it has been shown to be dangerous to those who are against the trans community.

[@johnsmith-ub7vr]

J.K. Rowling speaking out? I thought she was just speaking the truth.

[@MrPabgon]

So basically Richard Dawkins calls it insanity when people don't think the way he does(this, Christianity).

[@DellaStreet123]

To him, people who believe in anything that cannot be empirically proven are deluded, he's been saying that for about 20 years. The main difference is that Christianity and other forms of theism are no longer en vogue, but the fuss about trans, queer, "two spirits" and the like is.

[@meganjones1184]

Also Andrew, I read that the Y chromosome is dying out. The X DNA has 900 chromosomes and the Y has 50. This has happened in other species who have either become one sex able to reproduce on their own or have replaced the Y chromosome with something new that helps reproduction. Slightly off topic and I can't remember where I read it but maybe look it up, it's fascinating. Also it will take millions of years for humans Y chromosome to completely disappear.

[@pillsareyummy]

Transgenderism has to do with gender identity being incongruent with assigned sex. It's a phenomenon which appears to be related to the brain, not the body.

[@morticiag]

You have Read wrong. Its not dying out. And if it were, then that should be a cause for CONCERN, not to be celebrated.

[@morticiag]

​@@pillsareyummy Things of the brain involves IMAGINATION. It is SCI FI and NOT SCIENCE.

[@meganjones1184]

@MorticiaG nope double-checked, and it's not a cause for concern. Firstly it will take more than a million years and secondly nature fixes these issues. They believe something will take its place that will do the same job. Whether or not this is correct, it is just an article that I thought was interesting. I'm sure if you went back even 50 years, they would say you had lost your mind talking about DNA. Science is always progressing and learning new things. For example, there is a proposal to change the name alzheimers to type three diabetes. Science is theory and theories change and develop.

[@meganjones1184]

@Antibullshit I wasn't talking about transgenderism, that is why I said it was off topic!! I completely agree with you.

[@bluex.1016]

Rationality of the modern society

[@morticiag]

This is not Rationality.

[@honahwikeepa2115]

Richard Dork knows his science can't quantify personality.

[@marilynmalone1381]

So this man has clearly never heard of intersex people?

[@Chadcel564]

Intersex is not a gender

[@Chadcel564]

It’s actually a disorder during birth and the doctors do surgery to set them as a single gender of female or male

[@NoBonesNoLife]

Conjoined twins also exist but are not representatives of the overall human population

[@thinkingmonkey2393]

hey Richard, In the beginning God created them male and female.

[@cristiangaban960]

Created only the male , read your Bible .

[@mont5584]

God is a trickster. Thrown multiple curve balls that have cost agony and lives!

[@thinkingmonkey2393]

@@mont5584 Lucifer is the trickster. you're blaming the wrong God.

[@AlienOverlords_]

​@@thinkingmonkey2393The abrahamic religions and all religions for that matter have been debunked by default.

[@mina6mina]

and in the beginning, god said it's okay to own slaves as property and beat them with rods! he also made a book full of scientific inaccuracies, so who gives a shit because he didn't create anything!

[@babs_babs]

this dude is admitting to not knowing, then going on and giving his opinion as if it carries any weight. this is a great example of an appeal to authority. yikes man.

[@LiterallyLisa1]

Good point. And it’s not as he whispered his ignorance under his breath, he mentioned it openly several times. I’ll give him points for that, since everything that followed was fully biased opinion.

[@babs_babs]

@@LiterallyLisa1 the best thing he could have done was to not give his opinion. saying “i don’t know much about this subject” before he gives his opinion means absolutely nothing to anyone stupid or anyone primed to agree with him. he’s got authority and social credits and as a scientist he should know he’s using that credit in an irresponsible way. the dude should retire at this point.

[@The88Cheat]

@@LiterallyLisa1 What is biased about recognizing that transwomen are not the same as biological women?

[@LiterallyLisa1]

@@The88Cheat nothing. But that isn’t the issue here. The problem is that he is using his authority in the scientific community to promote his biased opinion that trans women are “verging on insanity.”

[@The88Cheat]

@@LiterallyLisa1 Saying "trans women are verging on insanity" would be kinda fucked up... except that isn't what he said. He said "...the positive statement that 'I am a woman' is verging on insanity." Those are two very different statements and I believe that it demonstrates your own biases that would you misrepresent his statement in such a way.

[@user-lw4yf8vz6w]

Always feel the truth from this man...Nobody else tells it for fear..

[@sydvicious52]

people who don't understand the difference between sex and gender be like

[@YwY-ct5yq]

You say that, but that's not how the trans concept is being practiced... Most of the time they do indeed equate gender with sex... If that were not the case then it would alright to say that 'Trans Women's are male ... But perhaps it's because we are forgetting that man and woman are just the non technical terms for male and female humans ...

[@sydvicious52]

@@YwY-ct5yq for cisgender people, sex and gender are the same, which makes it very difficult to tell the difference. but identity and the gender fiction are not just personal but also social relationships which rely on outside acknowledgement, so it's common for many trans people to shape their gender performance around the expectations of the opposite sex, if they are binary presenting, because that increases the likelihood that their presentation will be confirmed by others instead of met with confusion or hostility. saying "trans women are women and trans men are men" is not an attempt to equate all people biologically, it is instead to show support and recognition of someone's gender identity and protest their exclusion from gendered spaces (where they belong).

[@Behemoth_Rogue]

He's an evolutionary biologist, he knows more than you ever will. Lmao

[@tomasrocha6139]

How is gender different from sex when it's always been synonymous?

[@sydvicious52]

@@tomasrocha6139 like i said above, it has been synonymous for cisgender people, because generally their experience of gender performance and their sex align. male sex, male gender performance, etc. but since ancient history there have been people whose gender performance DOESN'T align with their sex, and this is where we see the distinction. where sex is mostly discussed in biological terms, gender is a construct created to "streamline" identification in society. since we are now seeing the flaws with this idea, as gender non-conforming people have existed for ages and been squished into a box by the idea of a "normal" gender presentation, we can now highlight the differences between gender (an outdated social function) and sex (a biological characteristic)

[@pjaworek6793]

Clickbait. He doesnt slam it, he says he doesnt know!!!

[@shadesofgray5476]

We all just humans. I think if we just treated each other equally as humans, things like honor killing, inequalities, and other unfairnesses would be greatly lessened. And religion is the biggest obstacle to people evolving beyond this primitive paradigm.On the other hand, scientists like to categorize things and ambiguity is not very helpful to their studies. I mean what if you threw out gender all together. How would you explain much of animal behavior without gender?

[@superiorbeing8805]

Im pretty sure youre reffering to sex. Because gender is something that only exists among humans

[@sydvicious52]

nobody's saying we have to throw out the way we look at animals, though. it's about having the freedom to express how you want, because we have the facilities for complex theory and animals don't c:

[@dingerling9017]

​@@sydvicious52there's things called personalities, fashion, names etc. Words have meaning, and we created language so that we can actually communicate. If you're just going to deconstruct every word until it means everything and nothing then there's no point in language.

[@sydvicious52]

@@dingerling9017 the point has never been to remove meaning from the words we use. that's a silly assertion. the point is to find ways to more accurately represent the human experience, which is something we are doing all of the time with everything else in the world. why is it now such a problem?

[@dingerling9017]

@@sydvicious52 Making words vague and non definable does not accomplish that. There's nothing noble or enlightening about crapping over existing things to replace them with worse things.

[@LiterallyLisa1]

In a vacuum, I can see what he is saying. Practically speaking, there are so many other factors involved with a person transitioning. There is so much fear and blind hatred for trans people at this moment in time, and that needs to be considered when making those sorts of blanket statements.

[@Kreepyb5]

Sending love to all transitioning ❤️

[@allytrudie864]

The trans community brought on all this new blind hatred themselves. Respect goes both ways. Trans women are not respecting women by elbowing their way into female single sex spaces without asking permission but demanding. Trans people wouldn’t have the issues they are having now if they didn’t join women’s sport, started flashing dick in women’s change rooms, and raping women in prison. I now refuse to use preferred pronouns which I had always done before all due to this. Trans people are losing this battle.

[@pillsareyummy]

I don't see how he's making a 'blanket statement'. He's simply stating that, for example, a man who identifies as a woman is not a woman, and he's correct. The trans activists have hijacked the word 'transgender', which means an incongruency between gender identify and assigned sex (biological sex). I feel bad for those who are transgender being lumped into the WOKE mob, many want nothing to do with it.

[@morticiag]

No. Trans people genuinely HATE themselves. The rest of the world is Exasperated with them.

[@morticiag]

​@@Kreepyb5 You should send love to these people BEFORE they transition. They mistakenly BELIEVE that by changing Themselves, who they are, that they will be more loved....? Its a FALSE love and a temporaryy attention boost

[@alexshaw4182]

Dawkins: There is only male and female - What about intersex? Dawkins: Well, well, there aren't very many

[@ReenieG1UK]

What about intersex? That is not a third sex and he is right, there aren’t many.

[@alexshaw4182]

@@ReenieG1UK There's 1.7% of the population who are labelled intersex. He can't say there's an objective duality if that many people are mixed. See?

[@TessdaWater]

​​@@alexshaw4182Literally this. A lot of people, Dawkins included, talk about sex and gender as A. The same thing B. Binaries The thing is, neither are binaries. The fact that intersex people can even exist obliterate a binary, because binary means only and exactly two possibilities. The fact that there are people who exist outside of this binary means that the binary doesn't exist. Edit: Sorry if I wasn't clear. I agree with you

[@feliscorax]

@@TessdaWaterLet’s break this down scientifcally: female is XX, male is XY, intersex is any of the 46XX/46XY, 46XX/47XXY or 45X/XY matrices. The existence of XXY, etc., does not refute the existence of the basic male/female biological dichotomy; instead, it is correctly understood as a genetic aberration which manifests as a minority difference of the basic gonochoric reality which defines the other 95+ per cent of the human species. In other words, intersex people are literally the exception which prove the existence of the biological rule. Denying that gender and sex are different - which Dawkins doesn’t do, by the way, despite your claim - is not the same thing as denying that a spectrum exists in which sexual differences exist (again, not something Dawkins is arguing). Secondly, what you have done in your comment is to create a syllogistic fallacy by thinking, because intersex is a divergent ontological reality within the spectrum of human sexual differentiation, that this necessarily means gender divergences share a similar ontological basis to sex that ultimately refutes the biological reality that is male:female difference. But, since gender is a sociological construct, it cannot be said to share the same scientific ontology as sex at all nor should the two be conflated. Gender is about the performativity of sociological roles whereas sex concerns the underlying biology. The binary dichotomy between sociology and biology is, thus, clear and separate rather than obliterated as implied in your comment, which consequently refutes any assertion that what is true in one category can be extrapolated and equally applied to another, epistemologically separate category. And, since the conflation is invalid, your argument is a non sequitur: it does not follow.

[@sciencifyingtheworld]

U really think u r smart💀 Exception does break the rule There are two sexes and human nature is supposed to have two sexes Intersex is variety of disorders like xxx,x0(turner), klinefelter's... This disorders also have harmful effects

[@More13Feen]

The binary would be woman on one side and man on other and aaall the variations from chromosomal, to hormonal, ohisical to psychological need to fit on that line. If you have PCO and the testosteron level of a man, that dosen't make you a man. If you have a micro penis or lose your testicals to cancer, that dosen't make you not a man. Its just more inclusive to think of it as a spectrum or a triangular steuctur. Still using the words that are used is just a way of stiml fiting in and using language that is understood. So if I present as a woman and pass as a woman, how could I call myself man? Thats why the saying goes trans woman are woman. Trans man are man. J.K Rolling is doing fine and still has millions of dollers and a larger following then bevore, whats sad is that she is truly realy hurt and traumatised a d projects her fear on to marginalised groups.

[@soft-spun]

Sex is binary. Sex characteristics are bimodal. A women with male typical testosterone (way more than in PCOS) is just as female as one without, not on a spectrum to and more male. She is, however, more masculine. The most logically and biologically consistent definitions are right. Old or new, majority or minority, doesn’t matter. The passing argument works the same for every form of transhumanism, from transracism to transageism to transableism (are you really gonna say someone who appears, presents and passes as, handicapped, is? What about the all the trans people who don’t pass? What if they pass to some but not others?).

[@morticiag]

Why do you emcourage peoole to HATE who they truly are? Should we encourage people AND CHILDREN to HATE the bodies they were born in, simply because the Trans agenda is now Popular and Trendy today? Jk Rowling was simoly Telling BASIC TRUTHS. WHEN people are living a LIE, they dont always want to hear TRUTH. Maybe theyre not ready to hear it? Does that mean we should stop speaking it ?

[@morticiag]

Biological S E X / Gender is Binary: you are EITHER XX or XY. Anything else, and it means you have a SYNDROME/Dissorder. However, people's bodies and characters and personalities are Not binary, they are on a spectrum. For example, You can have Girly Girls or Butch girls or tomboy girls. But they are STILL GIRLS (XX). You can have Manly boys, sporty Boys, academic boys, or feminine boys. But they are STILL BOYS (XY). OUR society today loosely speaks of desiring DIVERSITY, but actually, they want to ELIMINATE DIVERSITY between people! For example: "You're a BOY who likes the colour PINK???.. It means that deep DOWN, you MUST be a GIRL!" - this ideology CLAIMS to want to erase Stereotypes, but REINFORCES STEREOTYPES INSTEAD! THE DOUBLE STANDARDS are so painfully obvious, but many are too brainwashed to want to acknowledge them! Children are young, naïve and impressionable! If they see it makes YOU Happy and giddy that they call themselves TRANS, then they will CONVINCE themselves that thats what they are, without fully Understanding the Implications and Consequences of what it MEANS to be TRANS! This is extremely DANGEROUS to the Child, to the insecure teenager/adult and to Society as a Whole!

[@Mopark25]

"Its just more inclusive" there we go, the entire ideology is about pandering to feelings. It isn't a spectrum. It's binary. You're a man that likes to wear dresses and pretend he's a woman, but still a man. And these groups aren't marginalized, no one gives a shit, but these groups are trying to have men compete in women's sports and letting them into women's bathrooms. Sorry but the world doesn't need to bend to their delusions.

[@mont5584]

​​@@soft-spunhandicap really? WTH? Handicap is a ridiculous comparison.

[@KindNine]

Whether you think it's gone too far, you have to agree that there are legitimate cases of gender dysphoria, something has been been well known and studied for decades at least. In these people it does cause an overwhelming feeling as if they were born the wrong gender. And in many, if not most, of these cases it is gender affirming care that allows them to live happily and comfortably with themselves. I don't believe you can call your two old child "transgender", or arbitrarily decide to be "transgender". IMO

[@generaljo78]

I love the Dawkins. I was recently issued with a TikTok warning (against community standards) after I commented on a post of a transgender woman flirting to camera on a video that was captioned ‘If I’m not a real woman then what is this?’ - I was polite, I acknowledged their right to express themselves as a trans individual but also suggested that 2+2 doesn’t equal 5 and thus only a biological woman could be considered a real woman. According to TikTok - how dare I?! 👀

[@DewgNews]

It’s impossible to discuss a spectrum of color with black and white descriptions

[@morticiag]

Spectrum of colour is different to two Biological Se'xes.... Men are on a spectrum, but they are still Men. Example: you can have manly men or more sensitive, effeminate type of men. Same with women . We are not all cookie moulds. We are on a spectrum. And that's okay.

[@DewgNews]

@@morticiag I like how you just talked in a circle and wound up back to exactly what I said 😅

[@morticiag]

@@DewgNews okay. Your original point wasn't clear because many Wokists like to say that : "Gender is on a Spectrum", but they mean that there is all different, strange genders and not just two? I'm saying that there are just 2 genders because there are just 2 biological Se'xes, but each gender can present on a spectrum. See the difference? Which point of view do you take?;

[@DewgNews]

@@morticiag gender presentation being on a spectrum is why it’s impossible to discuss it in black and white terms. You’re again standing on the point I made and saying you’re right and I’m wrong. Also there’s nothing woke about what I’m saying. It’s a philosophical statement and supersedes any political ideology.

[@j-joe-jeans]

@@morticiag Where you are wrong at the core is that there are more than 2 sexes. Intrasexed people comprise about 1% of the population. They span the gamut of a-typical chromosomal, physiological and combinations at birth or later as puberty comes on, sometimes exposed much later. Please learn the science / facts before you make uneducated assertions.

[@outoforbit-]

The only thing i agree with him on as he is saying what the vast majority of people would say anyway. As a learned man who glorifies and is in love with science, i would have expected him to be opening his mouth quite frequently on this topic in the name of his first and only love, science, but no, he's either completely insincere or a coward. Likely both. But hey ho, there is nothing enduring about material reality.

[@outoforbit-]

@seph3803 cliche alert.

[@outoforbit-]

@seph3803 I'm not responsible for you, are you a little needy perhaps?

[@outoforbit-]

@seph3803 it's a very weird question for you to ask. As I already told you I'm not responsible for you. You are been overfamiliar with me and I don't like it.

[@outoforbit-]

@seph3803 sorry you got triggered.

[@outoforbit-]

@seph3803 you

[@sirijensen9839]

He is innsane for saying this, not a person born in a male boddy with a soul of a womman!

[@dinmardrom6752]

There’s no such thing as a soul

[@TessdaWater]

​@@dinmardrom6752Soul, mind, consciousness, essence, whatever. Picking apart word choice doesn't help the conversation.

[@tylerbeaumont]

How does he “slam” gender theory? He literally starts his point with disclosing that he isn’t educated enough to give a definite answer. Y’all are so desperate to find evidence for your hate that you can’t even listen to the video before claiming that it’s correct. Pathetic

[@user-co8qx4fo6j]

No bro. He is educated enough to tell us that we dont have enough evidence yet. Thats how science works!

[@AryaXVII]

Well it’s pretty clear he thinks it’s insanity 😂 cope

[@NickyM_0]

Everything is about 'hate' to you. You can't have a rational discussion or debate without bringing hate, lies, misinformation and abuse to the table.🙄

[@mont5584]

We don't have enough evidence yet! So, we should never throw the baby out with the bath water.

[@j-joe-jeans]

Stick to biological sciences Richard.

[@joygibbons5482]

That’s what he’s doing

[@j-joe-jeans]

@@joygibbons5482 Gender is not a biological category. Gender is a social and individual identity construct. Looks like you need lessons in biology vs mental concept / identity.

[@soft-spun]

@@j-joe-jeans Gender is a synonym for the sex noun, differentiating from the act. The word for constructs about gender/sex is sexism.

[@j-joe-jeans]

@soft-spun Not sure where you pulled those fictional definitions out of but the World Health Organization defines gender as: "Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are SOCIALLY constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. AS A SCOCIAL construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time." American Medical Women’s Association (AMWA) defines: " “Gender” refers to SOCIALLY constructed and enacted roles and behaviors which occur in a historical and CULTURAL CONTEXT and vary across societies and over time." The American Medical Association says (along with advocating for sex/gender affirming procedures be allowed and supported): "gender and gender IDENTITY are not always aligned or indicative of the other, and that gender for many individuals may DIFFER from the sex assigned at birth. " Oxford Definition: "the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female." Merriam-Webster Definition: " B) the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex C) gender identity" Sexism: "prejudice or discrimination based on sex especially : discrimination against women " Merriam-Webster Care to try again?

[@soft-spun]

@@j-joe-jeans In this, those institutions are about as scientific as the field when it classified homosexuality as an ILLNESS and LOBOTOMIZED people. Now it’s one thing to dispute what gender rightfully means, but since you dispute the fact that multitudes of people, including professionals, are using gender as your liberal sexism (obviously, absurdly prejudicial, oppressive and regressive) and as the original sex synonym (such as by my cat’s vets or in Websters1913 and older dictionaries wherein this is the only one listed, which even now Wiktionary won’t deny, at the basis of the “changing language” issue the past decades)… I’ll leave you to licking lead boots.

[@mercedeswalt6621]

Yeah, this really disappointed me. I used to adore Dawkins, and it’s disappointing to see this man of science not only stand in the way of human rights, but side with bigots that he should find intolerable.

[@professionalnugget]

Ikr, I like Richard's view on the origin of life and all, but when sociology is involved, you can just see how uninformed this old man is

[@mercedeswalt6621]

@@professionalnugget yeah, it’s a bummer. I mean, it’s fine that he’s clueless about trans people, but he’s actively taking a stand against them by siding with people like JKR. He doesn’t need to fully understand the trans experience, but he should have the awareness to understand that they’re just another group getting fucked by religious dogma and it’s bigots. Great name, btw.

[@vidaro1073]

You are right, but he is still doing more good than bad

[@mercedeswalt6621]

@@vidaro1073 maybe that is true. But at the same time, bigots love it when science gives them a bone. And here we have a man of science saying that a very rich and powerful voice for transphobia, (JKR) is being “bullied.”

[@ianthomas7863]

J.K Rowlings Human Rights have been attacked, by uneducated bigots. Dr Dawkins scientific opinion is the correct one.

[@user-we6rk2ys3e]

Gender theory is right.We human are yin and yang(yin considered feminine in society,yang masculine in society)at brain or mental leval.But yeah biology also define that

[@ericferre]

Good luck with that

[@dunitasbrotton8788]

I do not think that J K Rowling has suffered as a result of her speaking about what a woman is and to be more specific, her speaking against Trans people. I think she can not know what being Trans is because she isn't one. Like she can not speak about what is a Woman, since she is a woman But can not speak on behaf of all the women. I am a woman, and I have a total different opinion. I do not feel threaten by Trans people. How about being a little bit more respectful of others and Not Preach or presume WHO others are.? What happened to " live and let live.

[@patwhite8106]

A trans woman is not a woman

[@dingerling9017]

She definitely has, and I say this as someone who doesn't like her. She hates men, and that stuff is what drives most of her transgender opinions. It's funny how so many of the people who are mad at her were fine when she kept her comments exclusive to men. To say she hasn't suffered is a lie though, but I guess you are right in that it impacts her less than others since she has already had her career and success and no longer needs to walk a line. But, if regular livestreamers were being harassed, doxxed and documented for streaming a Harry Potter video game, I'm pretty sure she deals with similar stiff constantly. I remember seeing a story about how they went and found where she lived. The transgender topic attracts some of the most unhinged people imaginable who practically think someone having a different opinion to them warrants any sort of obsessive treatment of that person.

[@TessdaWater]

​@@patwhite8106False. Read up and try again.

[@edejong]

Strange to think that he must always have been a fascist.

[@flochforster88]

The people giving out about Fascism certainly make me realise which the good side is.

[@edejong]

@@flochforster88 Sorry, non-English here. Giving out is like dishing out? Anyway, regarding Trans as a manky ideology implies a moral judgment thus fascism. You know, the Trans with their agenda, after no good. They have to be dealt with.

[@flochforster88]

@@edejong Wait... was your comment about him serious? 😂

[@edejong]

@@flochforster88Yes, to me it's fairly straightforward.

[@flochforster88]

@@edejong ...can you explain to us what Fascism is?

[@porshamarshall4658]

The fool says in his heart” There is no God”

[@feonor26]

Written by some fool

[@porshamarshall4658]

@@feonor26 But even a fool, knows deep down there is a void they can’t explain.Usually they will try to fill the void with either alcohol, drugs, sex etc etc. But it is only a temporary fix, that just simply cant fill the unexplainable void.

[@feonor26]

@@porshamarshall4658 That's called god of the gaps. Everyone has a void they are trying to fill, maybe not everyone but a lot of people even Christian pastors. How do you explain those pastors caught with gay prostitutes while being on crack in a public bathroom? Ted Haggard being a shining example.

[@ericferre]

Actuallywhat he says is "there are no Gods" . Plural. ANd unless you believe in Zeus, you share that feeling to a certain degree. YOu are calling yourself a fool. Peace

[@porshamarshall4658]

@@ericferre No, in Psalm 14:1 The fool has said in his heart There is no GOD! You can try and change what it says to suit your own narrative that you have got going, but the truth still stands and is quite fitting don’t you think? If you read on, it says they are corrupt, their acts are vile, there is none that does good! We are not talking about Greek mythological gods here, I’m talking of the Great I Am, the alpha and omega! The one who formed you in your mothers womb!

[@EdgarStyles1234]

He's a coward in his old age

[@PrestoJacobson]

Agreed; I won't be watching this one.

[@PrestoJacobson]

I think Andrew might agree with Dawkins though, as he hearted a comment on his community post that said "it takes integrity to admit you're not a woman but still get to beat them in sports." I dunno, maybe there's nuance here.

[@MzMarvelous]

There's nothing coward about speaking your opinion, especially when it isn't what the masses agree with. You can disagree, but he's not coward. Richard Dawkins is no coward.

[@findiwindles]

​@@MzMarvelous Agreed. Albeit, it seems to me he's saying he doesn't have an opinion on the theory, largely due to his lack of knowledge. I see that as a refreshingly enlightened approach, compared to all the absolute certainty expressed by many with similar or less knowledge of the facts. Perhaps he would be more inclined to offer an opinion if he were aware of all the suffering people trying to detransition.

[@morticiag]

​@@MzMarvelous Richard Dawkins is a Massive COWARD... 😅😅 He is a Man of All talk and No action... Typical . What has he done for Humanity as a whole, besides whine and hate on others who think differently to him? Dawkins was once pressed by a Je'wish reporter to ADMIT that the idea that we came from NOTHING but Magical cosmic gases was somewhat ridiculous! Dawkins knows that deep down, it's a bad idea. So he went on to ADMIT that "intelligent Design" DID in fact, create us, but in his Hatred for YAH (God) , he was pushing the "Ancient Alien" agenda... 😅😅 This man can't stick to anything. An empty vessel.

[@boredweegie553]

devastated...got all his books.he's been my hero BUT. i don't know what's happened to him

[@english3082]

He's sticking to reality. Once again.

[@funkyfranx]

He believes in biological reality. Damn shame.

[@royroy3]

Thats a very stupid comment. Just because hes an atheist doesn't mean he's going to agree with every progressive stance the political left.

[@charisma-hornum-fries]

Especially since he has colleagues who are researchers in the field and has found some evidence that there are alterasions within the brain. To me ir sounds like a lot of talk and too little field work.

[@allytrudie864]

He is my hero. Reality and science can’t die. And it won’t. The trans will lose this gender battle we are having.

[@Liam1536]

Gonna have to completely disagree with Richard on this one didn’t know Dawkins was transphobic it’s quite a shame coming from a fan who’s a trans man

[@wet-read]

He seemed wishy washy in the Pakman interview. People he thinks are legitimately trans he apparently has a lot of sympathy for, but also thinks that the more people coming out as trans these days is some sort of fad. I wish he would just STFU about it. He speaks of certain people's lives and livelihoods being threatened... but those pale in comparison to anti-trans bigotry and violence.

[@BIaZeDaSHeLL]

Trans ideology is just as deluded as religious fanatics

[@USA_UNITED1776]

He's a rational man, he doesn't care about your feelings. That's why he's so great, and why he is so hated

[@Liam1536]

@@USA_UNITED1776 he is a rational man on most things but I’m gonna have to disagree with his take this time considering how it’s empirically false

[@Liam1536]

@@wet-read agreed

[@seandipaul8257]

This man is genuinely evil to the core.

[@davebritton7648]

You are genuinely a complete idiot.

[@halocraze9839]

Wtf😂

[@Username35345]

Found the lib

[@3brenm]

wtf? Dawkins?? You are off the deep end and I'm a moderate left soc dem.

[@Username35345]

@@3brenm capitalism is the way

[@morticiag]

Richard Dawkins is part of the problem that we see in Western Society today. His continual Bashing of Christian and Conservative morals and principles through the years has helped to culminate in this general Lawlessness and Rebellion against everything Society once held to high standard. Jesus Christ said of these types of wolves in sheep's clothing::"You will know them by their Fruit," Well, Dawkins. HERE IS YOUR FRUIT. I Present to you the REWARDS of your many years of Constant Bleating. How does it make you feel, Dawkins?! To have achieved a Generation of people who Think LIKE YOU, AND SOME! (Because your Age now works against you, somewhat!) We, as a Society , are slowly eroding those "Conservative" Traditions and Values that you once turned your nose up to and sneared at... Are you HAPPY now, Dawkins? You have achieved the godless Dystopia you have always craved... don't TELL ME that this ISNT what you wanted? Come, Come, Now, Dawkins.. you dont think you were at the Forefront of such innovative ideologies?? Are you going to Deny your involvement in this Mess to yourself and to the world,? Will you EVER be truly HAPPY, Dawkins? Something tells me NOT! SOMETHING tells me you will ALWAYS be a Miserable Man with something to complain about, yes?

[@pollyparrot9447]

Why are Christians always so angry? It's not a good advertisement for their cult.

[@professionalnugget]

Are you ok?

[@morticiag]

@@professionalnugget I'm well thanks. How are you?

[@professionalnugget]

@@morticiag pretty good, thanks

[@morticiag]

@@professionalnugget 👍. That's good.

[@zah936]

Brave man

[@pmamonthero6641]

Most trans people i know dont think like this they are fully aware they are biologically male and medically transitions to live as close as they can to the opposite sex ro feel comfortable in their own skin and for the most part they can without any issues, yet everybody is freaking out over nothing, pwople hate what they do t understand i can bet most the people comment in this issue have never even met a trans person or at tbe very least knows one personally

[@krismck6872]

He didnt slam anything. He literally said brains can have male and female tendencies...thats the whole argument for transgenderism