I can't believe I wasted 30 years of my life in Islam. I've been an atheist for about a year now, can't be happier with my transition
@onnol9173 жыл бұрын
Good on you for choosing life
@truthseekerBVC3 жыл бұрын
Welcome bruv, it was 21 for me!
@domconroy58973 жыл бұрын
Well done for your transition!! On being a sceptic!
@MrDophilus3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to the enlighten side.
@leedorey37683 жыл бұрын
Welcome to reality, life is more amazing than dogma.
@jakubport73613 жыл бұрын
"You can have different opinions and beliefs. But you can't have different facts." Very important statement
@jakubport73613 жыл бұрын
@@tonyboleno8191 exactly
@heatherb8123 жыл бұрын
@@ms33pt Or how about we just let people live their goddamn lives? This is the only life we’re guaranteed to have; if people want to focus their energy on actually enjoying their godless lives instead of adhering to soul-sucking, arbitrary dogma, then all the power to them!
@chriskelly34813 жыл бұрын
@@ms33pt Well, I'm convinced. Hinduism; Here I come!
@olebilly3 жыл бұрын
I like what Dawkins brings to the table. Very eye opening. EXCEPT, modern science allows us to bring people back from dead literally.. Beyond Thousands of NDE's that all correlate regardless of types of religions. Sure the mind is "just brains" as Dawkins states, but how can these people hover above their body as it is "pronounced dead" ? Science has no way to put these near death experiences to test. So at the end of the day it is faith*
@krtcampbell90073 жыл бұрын
@@olebilly how does a person hover over there dead body.. WELL I have been dead before so I can have my 2 cents. I believe it's the same reason aliens travel billions of light years to do anal probes and abductions no one else has ever witnessed. It's a mass delusion that came about at the same time as people invented the soul of men.. and the I never seen the bright light at the end of the tunnel or jesus waiting for me either. So peoples preconceived notions of what they believe others want to hear. Lies, lies and more lies. Funny how millions have seen ghosts but not one single person has the slightest real proof of there sightings. Funny that.
@RicAdbur Жыл бұрын
"The periodic table of things that don't exist is infinite" is a great line.
@nathanwaibel45411 ай бұрын
It really is. But it doesn't explain his definition of atheism..
@luish14986 ай бұрын
@@nathanwaibel454atheist is a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods. do you believe in santa?
@TheBebe6666 ай бұрын
@@nathanwaibel454 Do you really need definition of that word? It is f...g self-explanatory
@ToTheDoom5 ай бұрын
@@TheBebe666well to be honest its not self explanatory, non-believer is self explanatory atheist is not. Its explanation is unclear to a lot of people because many people find it hard to separate between ideas of an agnostic and an atheist. Since atheism in and itself is a belief its definition can vary based on a person to person basis. I’ve met people who believe there is some wacky-power that initialised creation , also believe in evolution, also believe in soul but don’t believe in any religion or a God in any traditional way. Some believe nature itself should be considered as a God or the sun since everything comes from it but also don’t give the Sun any anthropomorphic characteristics nor think it has any will and know its just a gaseous ball emitting heat and light yet they want to worship it as the creator!😂 people are different and tge question above I think could have come from a person who believes atheism to be a personal belief customised to ones understanding of the universe, you can’t blame someone for that!
@lumossir50124 ай бұрын
Wow... indeed it is!
@firbolg Жыл бұрын
As an atheist kid (with atheist parents) growing up in a foreign deeply catholic country, I was always attacked and discriminating for asking and being curious. And like Ricky, when people told me I shouldn't question, it only made me want to question more!
@2fast2block Жыл бұрын
And look how you supposedly question more but you're still a doofus like Ricky and RD. "People who believe in God don’t need proof of his existence, and they certainly don’t want evidence to the contrary. They are happy with their belief. They even say things like “it’s true to me” and “it’s faith." Ricky Gervais Ricky does not know what biblical faith is because he just does not care to know. Biblically, faith means trust. It's a trust by evidence seen. God asks that we prove things. To reason. To get knowledge. To study. God has nothing to hide. We develop trust from what is seen, and that which is not seen yet is trusted also because of the trust built up from what is seen. It's much like a human relationship. We don't trust much until a person has gained that trust from what is observed. The difference is though, God is not limited to human powers. He created us. Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. crossexamined.org/biblical-faith-vs-blind-faith/ www.truthortradition.com/articles/what-does-the-bible-say-about-faith www.revisedenglishversion.com/Appendix/16/Faith_is_Trust www.truthortradition.com/articles/faith-a-confident-expectation-of-gods-promises-coming-to-pass www.truthortradition.com/articles/hebrews-1-11-and-faith Ricky can't even explain the start, creation, and yet he acts so smugly. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k
@colintimp13728 ай бұрын
I had a friend who's mother was deeply Christian. Another friend and I tried to ask her why she believes what she believes. She not only didn't have an answer, she got angry and threw us out of her house.
@od91707 ай бұрын
@@2fast2block "We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God." How can a supernatural lawgiver give those laws in the first place without having his own set of laws for his own existence? Therefore even if there was a God it could be explained with Science (but possibly not our current understanding of it). Then the question becomes what created that God and therefore at best it's highly improbable that there is a God as you might as well cut of the middle man so to speak.
@2fast2block7 ай бұрын
@@od9170 Asking how God was created makes no sense. Clearly creation had to be done by a supernatural creator. A supernatural who created the natural realm of time, space, and matter, along with the natural laws that govern it, is not bound by the natural laws the supernatural creator created. That's basic logic but not if people are NOT logical.
@od91707 ай бұрын
@@2fast2block I'm not saying it would be bound by the natural laws it created. The first sentence of my comment was "How can a supernatural lawgiver give those laws in the first place without having his own set of laws for his own existence?". If you're saying that God can just exist (no questions asked) then why can't you apply that way of thinking to the "thing" the Universe sits within? If you're saying that God cannot just exist then I refer to my original comment "How can a supernatural lawgiver give those laws in the first place without having his own set of laws for his own existence?" and if this is the case it can therefore be explained with Science. I understand how you come to the conclusion that there must be a God but your argument is illogical for the reasons given above.
@Pete_YT3 жыл бұрын
Better to have questions you can't answer than answers you can't question.
@2fast2block3 жыл бұрын
Better to have a sound mind than to think of silly questions and don't question what you believe. They both believe creation happened on its own and they are fine with that despite the evidence. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
@NoTengoIlusiones3 жыл бұрын
@@2fast2block ufffff messy speech.
@homewithaheartlastchancere57893 жыл бұрын
Genius
@2fast2block3 жыл бұрын
@@NoTengoIlusiones Here's what happens when you give an empty person common science they can't contend with, they will completely ignore it and since they are inept human beings that don't care, they will think they have something clever to say that makes it look like they are not as shallow as they are, so this is what is considered a good scientific come back to all the science they were provided: Drumroll, please.... their science....."ufffff messy speech." Yes, I'm serious. I'm not making this up. They are really that empty.
@NoTengoIlusiones3 жыл бұрын
@@2fast2blockWith my short comment obviously I was misunderstood. I'm Atheist, Science man. My comment was regarding your text/comment. I subscribe it, but the text is Long and messy. Just be more concise on this small text boxes ( aka comments).
@philorgneopolotin87623 жыл бұрын
19:41 is when the Ricky Gervais and Richard Dawkins conversation actually begins
@hazembenhassine14283 жыл бұрын
The hero we need but do not deserve
@nocapfacts93303 жыл бұрын
Eminem is the greatest haha your dp bro
@denizdurdag3 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@nesh18183 жыл бұрын
You are divine 💯💯
@thehungrycat72813 жыл бұрын
You sir are doing the God’s work.
@tomyates-zs6zk4 ай бұрын
Ricky is really, really intelligent - he doesn’t waste words. Top video
@robotstonka7118 Жыл бұрын
I want that on my t-shirt "Remember if you don't sin Jesus died for nothing"!! 🤣😂🤣
@Mortthemoose19 күн бұрын
😂😂
@alexstonephoto3 жыл бұрын
For anyone wondering, this took place on the 3rd of September 2019.
@morpheus88953 жыл бұрын
you're a god (figuratively)
@sidarthur87063 жыл бұрын
they did it the bastards. it's all an atheist plot
@kens8053 жыл бұрын
THX! Makes more sense now.
@prla54003 жыл бұрын
Javed Akhtar won this year's award
@dawnofvoice3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I could not understand where this would have been held with so many unmasked people in May 2020!
@panterablu3 жыл бұрын
I would say personally thank you to the person who put Dawkins and Gervais in the same room. Great idea and conversation.
@johnjones15343 жыл бұрын
Since Dawkins name is on the statuette they presented to Ricky, I think he's the thankee.
@michaelgaytan65622 жыл бұрын
Bravo!
@honeychurchgipsy62 жыл бұрын
@ IBS (haha - I see what you did there - very funny) - Dawkins appeared on Ricky's podcast a few years ago - that was the first time I realised how intelligent and well informed he was. They seem genuinely fond of each other.
@themistersmith2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, my IQ went down 30 points after listening to these two
@jackwhitbread45832 жыл бұрын
It was fine, much preferred tim minchin and Richard Dawkins. Tim proved to be just as intelligent and as engaging as Dawkins
@scoot882 жыл бұрын
It is amazing to me that, here we have one man's common sense and realistic outlook on life wrapped in good humor, lining up with another man's life long scientific work regarding life and death. Every time Richard agreed with Ricky it boosted my admiration for Ricky. If only more of us had good common sense. Credit to these men. We need these men more now than ever.
@jackwhitbread4583 Жыл бұрын
Another good one is Dawkins in conversation with Tim Minchin, who funnily enough is also an incredibly well educated man. More so than Ricky I would say but I highly recommend checking it out as well as the comedy works of Tim Minchin. Tim is also the composer and lyricist of 2 major Broadway musicals, Matilda and Groundhog day. Tim is a phenomenal composer and a master pianist
@LIF3L3SSD34D11 ай бұрын
Common sense is deducing the that when there was the lack of matter and from this nothingness our universe was created, we are derived from Prehistoric apes into humans with critical thought, empathy and a sense of right and wrong and we are the only species that has ever evolved into highly intelligent beings. Bacteria Flagella are complex organisms that without every single component that is part of it it would not work, just like any other mechanism like in a combustible engine without the starter, fuel pump etc. I feel that many of these swaggering athiests belittle, poke fun and do the exact thing many hipochristians do and make the other out as dumb or superstitious and christians label athiests as worthless sinners who hate anyone that practices religion (I have seen hypocrites and egotistical bullies. At least Athiests have a valid reason because of their belief or lack therof but us Christians only help thwir case by not showing live amd kindness even wj Hen it isn't reciprocated😊
@markosetinc672310 ай бұрын
Ohh yeahh...the awkward silence, following the meanderings of this wannabe intelligent comedian at 42.40 - 43.00 struck me with awe as well
@sheenastenico82769 ай бұрын
@FrankHeuvelman5 ай бұрын
Every mentally healthy human being has common sense. The problem is that in so many cultures common sense is a threat against their current status quo and power structure.
@roblewis8227 Жыл бұрын
These two are such an unlikely combo but it's perfect. I'm glad I work alone, I keep bursting out laughing
@nuriagiralt6172 жыл бұрын
"If people didn't invent gods, I wouldn't have to deny them" Brilliant!
@jackcummings41212 жыл бұрын
Can anyone prove someone invented God..? Or did God invent us ?
@divertiti2 жыл бұрын
@@jackcummings4121 Yes, unequivocally. Everything that's ever been written about God was written by man.
@divertiti2 жыл бұрын
@Hashirama Senju Give examples of what any of them predicted
@rajk5782 жыл бұрын
And didn’t continue inventing them!
@jackwhitbread45832 жыл бұрын
@Jiren-the-Grey it's the same reason the simpsons have predicted so much that has happened, its been on the air for almost 35 years and when something is on for a very long time then many predictions are bound to come true. It has everything to do with maths and statistics and absolutely nothing to do with some invisible sky daddy
@JMUDoc3 жыл бұрын
"Why don't you pray just in case there's a god?" "Would your god be happy with just-in-case worship?"
@davesteadman12263 жыл бұрын
That would really suck because you'd hope to escape hell but then god would be really pissed and you'd be even worse off in hell.
@therealpanse3 жыл бұрын
@@davesteadman1226 What god would you pray to? there are over a hundred now, which one is the right one? maybe everyone goes to hell of some sort, because the real religion was snuffed out thousands of years ago? Just in case... you're better off not worshiping anyone, just so you don' pray to the wrong god.
@JMUDoc3 жыл бұрын
@@therealpanse *What god would you pray to? there are over a hundred now, which one is the right one? maybe everyone goes to hell of some sort, because the real religion was snuffed out thousands of years ago?* Or maybe the right god hasn't been "discovered" yet...
@JMUDoc3 жыл бұрын
@A Human Being Hope for things you know to be possible. Hoping to win the lottery makes more sense - infinitely more, in fact - than hoping for a heaven because we have *confirmable examples* of people having won the lottery.
@sidarthur87063 жыл бұрын
innit. it especially annoys me when muslims use that argument. the quran is very clear on what happens to religious hypocrites. they'll receive a punishment worse than idolators, it says. because idolators are at least honest
@doggity5149 Жыл бұрын
Excuse my ignorance, didnt really know Richard Wiseman but he did an amazing job hosting this. Well done sir!
@whiterastajapanic3 ай бұрын
No not really, neither informed nor humorous and his choice of audience questions …questionable
@alloriginalpiratesАй бұрын
Yeah I found his attempts at humour a little grating and his questions inane.
@maxdavidyermolaev4164Ай бұрын
We got top tier comedy and great philosophical debate at the same time. This is gold
@JimT-RCT2 жыл бұрын
For a bloke who is just up for a laugh, I think Ricky Gervais is one of the very best influencers of our time. He is not afraid of speaking the truth.
@pydzio2 жыл бұрын
Well, he's stating his opinion, not really "the truth". And I think his point was to actually distinguish opinions from scientific facts.
@JamesMooreMarketing2 жыл бұрын
Never liked him to be honest until his show Afterlife ( man had me in tears with the writing in it) ....and Now I'm actually learning more from him about religion than any other person ever..
@SStupendous2 жыл бұрын
Love him, as a theist. And Dawkins. The power to be so respectful and calm in tight debates, as well as being able to have humor like this is a great skill.
@maxczapski22392 жыл бұрын
@@pydzio Exactly. And, on top of that, I wouldn't say nowadays anyone is particularly afraid to express their opinion, unless they live under an oppressive regime or belong to a particular community from which they don't want to be excluded for contradicting its moral or spiritual views. In today's world the leading reason people hide or manipulate facts for is greed.
@ceedub38942 жыл бұрын
@@JamesMooreMarketing same man , this bloke I would love too walk my dog with
@harrisonboone22483 жыл бұрын
My Irish Granddad told me "It's bad luck to be superstitious".
@giacomogenovese81663 жыл бұрын
Here in Italy we say: "it's stupid to be superstitious, but not being it brings bad luck"
@harrisonboone22483 жыл бұрын
@@giacomogenovese8166 Ha haa, yes, our two cultures have a lot in common. No shoes on the table... :-)
@harrisonboone22483 жыл бұрын
@Yakdo If only you were in my band (Eurothrash)in 1986- 1989 we might have made it out of our garage and onto a stage. :-)
@garyskinner24223 жыл бұрын
Haha
@jacquelinevanderkooij43013 жыл бұрын
So he was a controled christian ...
@yashptel Жыл бұрын
People like him give me hope for humanity
@markuss4133 Жыл бұрын
You are welcome, Sir. ;)
@ladybugmanda Жыл бұрын
Yes! 💘
@DEEPMUCH10 ай бұрын
I was going to type this exact thing for my comment....weird...are we each other in an alternate universe?If we are you are very RAD!!:p
@SilverSurfer51508 ай бұрын
What can Atheism give humanity hope for?
@SilverSurfer51508 ай бұрын
@@user-lc6ed8zs7f But Atheism is irrational. It flies in the face of everything we are surrounded by but not only that, even who we are as human beings.
@SixthEstateAZ Жыл бұрын
As a “recovering Catholic ” man of Catholic upbringing by my mother and a Lutheran dad, I find these discussions valuable!
@MissMariQueen Жыл бұрын
"Recovering Catholic", I love that 😀
@dennoow9 ай бұрын
Welcome to reason!
@SportsBoss9995 ай бұрын
Many of us have fallen prey (no pun intended) to believing in a God that doesn't exist. Until we do our OWN thinking on this can we re-program our minds. I gew up a Protestant and have never been a religious person, but my parents believed in God. I did too for a long time. I don't anymore. There's to much evidence to me that there isn't one.
@theChrisCroft3 жыл бұрын
"The periodic table of non-existent things is infinite" - SO good!
@dudicaffmusicgroup.72943 жыл бұрын
Who said that?
@methemeticien3 жыл бұрын
@@dudicaffmusicgroup.7294 Ricky
@mustafakeblawi64503 жыл бұрын
You cannot mathematically list them in an infinite table. It does not fit
@laurelpritchard45403 жыл бұрын
And read Kurt Anderson's "Fantasyland " for a great history of delusion in America !
@Mr2TIMOTHY4V23 жыл бұрын
Yahuah will destroy the elements themselves when he destroys this earth and cosmos- a very scientific statement. Will you be in the new earth? Have You Heard the True Good Message truerevival.yolasite.com/have-you-heard-the-true-gospel.php 2Pe_3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of Elohim, wherein the shamayim ( pw heavens) being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
@akbarahmed30783 жыл бұрын
I have left Islam about 3-4 years ago! I am so happy and proud to be able to get out of such an indoctrination. It really is difficult to get out of this bubble we were born into.
@abdulwasi44863 жыл бұрын
Lol what a joke
@elenanora403 жыл бұрын
Congrats Man ! You are Brave and Smart ! Stay cool and help others to do the same !
@2fast2block3 жыл бұрын
@@berry9653 I'm against man-made religions with no foundation. God is not a religion. You have your own man-made religion of atheism. It's believing in things you have no proof for. It's a blind faith. Watch this, how can creation happen on its own? Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Show me how you got around those laws and have proof to back you up.
@moonsaer3 жыл бұрын
@@2fast2block u say fools resort to science fiction yet you yourself are resorting to a supernatural. Why do you think science should have the answers to life, universe and everything. We are mortal humans with small brains. Life is a mystery and there is much we dont know. No one is saying with certainty what happened with the big bang. We're just saying we dont know yet :) Its all theories, and so is your god. A theory, that has many inconsitencies.
@2fast2block3 жыл бұрын
@@moonsaer now copy and paste where you gave anything how you got around the laws I gave. Please try. You are good at giving laughs.
@jacksimpson-rogers1069 Жыл бұрын
"garlic over you door in case there's a Dracula" Brilliant.
@billmiller3425 Жыл бұрын
I forget where I heard it but it's the best response to the question "What do you think it's like after you die? The answer was "do you remember what it was like before you were born? It's like that."
@2fast2block Жыл бұрын
I'd think those that are aborted by having them ripped apart is memorable. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXzZZnR4nNaDitk kzbin.info/www/bejne/e4TUlaCHe7mBnqc
@leeturner3750 Жыл бұрын
Alan Watts 👍🏼
@Moluccan56 Жыл бұрын
Been saying that for years.
@SchemeTintFocus2 ай бұрын
I draw the same conclusion
@tiki9159 күн бұрын
I thought about it by myself not knowing someone did it, too..and yes, its the same thing..nothing before, nothing after..its all now
@sarahlewandowicz76962 жыл бұрын
"I'm oppressed in 13 countries I'd never go to anyways." Gold.
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn3632 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZnSyho1tj8igaNk - I’d love to know your thoughts on this
@lachazaroony3 жыл бұрын
My favourite Ricky quote: "Why did God make me an Athiest?"
@JimOverbeckgenius3 жыл бұрын
He didn't but Satan did.
@backgammonbacon3 жыл бұрын
@@JimOverbeckgenius Satan creates people now?
@JimOverbeckgenius3 жыл бұрын
@@backgammonbacon Who do think made hell - him or you and your kind!?
@backgammonbacon3 жыл бұрын
@@JimOverbeckgenius We are all the same kind you know that right?
@kevinbaskin94893 жыл бұрын
@@backgammonbacon you know what the point was
@angelaclark129 Жыл бұрын
I'm religious, and it's nothing to do with anyone else. It's personal. I love Ricky and Richard. They are both intelligent, thoughtful, thought-provoking authors/speakers. A delightful session. 😁
@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors Жыл бұрын
I respect your views and all points of view. The problem I have with Dawkins etc. is that science cannot prove or disprove a god or superior being or entity.
@alessandropetrozzino8747 Жыл бұрын
As a matter of fact science, nor logic, can’t disprove the existance of unicorns, lr anything that doesn’t exist, it can only eventually prove what exists.
@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors Жыл бұрын
@@alessandropetrozzino8747 my point exactly, just because science can't prove the existence of something, does not mean it does not exist! Maybe science does not have the ability/skill yet! So until you disprove it you can't say it doesn't exist!
@georgedoyle2487 Жыл бұрын
@@alessandropetrozzino8747 “Unicorns” Awww how quaint the “unicorn” argument versus the belief in the fundamental nature of [Mind and consciousness/monotheism/rationality/logos/objective morality]. I prefer the tooth fairy argument myself with Dwayne Johnson in lead role!! Please do the tooth fairy argument next time!! It’s a much higher IQ argument than the “unicorn” argument!! If only you could have been around during the time of Michelle Besso, Sir Francis Bacon, John Henslow, Dostoyevsky, Kepler, Newton, Thomas Aquinas, Anselmo d’Aosta, Miguel de Cervantes, Charles Dickens, Shakespeare, Augustine, Emanuel Kant, Gregor Mendel, George Lemaitre, Descartes, Kierkegaard and Hegel etc you could have saved them all from their misguided belief in the fundamental nature of [Mind and consciousness/monotheism/rationality/logos/objective morality] with your Earth shattering “unicorn” argument!! Equally, the prominent Humanist and philosopher professor Michael Ruse helpfully pointed out that… “Their [the new atheists]” which includes (Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennette and Richard Dawkins ) “treatment of the religious viewpoint is pathetic to the point of non-being. Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course.” (Michael Ruse: Professor and Specialist in Philosophy of Biology). “Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion -- a full-fledged alternative to Christianity.” (Michael Ruse). “The literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” (Michael Ruse).
@georgedoyle2487 Жыл бұрын
@@alessandropetrozzino8747 “Science, nor logic can’t disprove unicorns” This is beyond ironic!! Sorry but the “natural sciences” are saturated with philosophical presuppositions, that is unprovable metaphysical presuppositions and transcendental categories such as (Truth) itself, that is value claims, the prescriptive laws of logic, (conscious agents and freewill, that is rationality itself), inductive reasoning, identify over time, space, time, being, the one and the many, empiricism, the myth of the given etc!! (Gotcha!!!) You seriously haven’t done your homework buddy!! Furthermore, despite appearances, the “natural sciences” offers no certainty. Decades of progress in the philosophy of science have led us to accept that our prevailing scientific understanding is a limited time offer, valid only until a new observation or experiment proves that it’s not. Equally, it turns out to be impossible even to formulate a scientific theory without metaphysics, without first assuming some things we can’t actually prove, such as the existence of an objective reality, conscious agents and freewill, that is rationality itself, the prescriptive laws of logic and empiricism etc. Not to mention identity over time, the myth of the given, the one and the many, time, space, cause and effect. Sorry but science can’t “prove” anything as it is provisional and can only infer. As I pointed out already it’s a constantly changing landscape regarding what (is) not what (ought) to be. Equally, the belief that the future will be like the past is a metaphysical presupposition, that is a transcendental category. Furthermore, according to Karl Popper, who created the principle of falsification in the first place because logical positivism was self refuting and we needed a way to delineate between empirical and non empirical modes of knowledge and understanding, according to Popper… “The belief that science proceeds from observation to theory is still so widely and so firmly held that my denial of it is often met with incredulity” (Karl Popper)… Karl Popper goes on to point out the obvious fact that…. “Observation is always selective. It needs a chosen object, a definite task, an interest, a point of view, a problem. And its description presupposes a descriptive language, with property words; it presupposes similarity and classification, which in their turn presuppose interests, points of view, and problems”(Karl Popper). Everything Karl Popper lists here such as (observation/empiricism), a description language with property words and classifications, not to mention the belief that the future will be like the past, even these are philosophical, that is unprovable metaphysical presuppositions and transcendental categories that can not be proven, justified or grounded using this strictly reductive, causally closed, effectively complete, atheistic nihilistic b…sht that clearly excludes metaphysical realities. The fact is that what we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our limited sensory organs and current knowledge and method of questioning. According to Karl Popper.... “Scientists should be humble as a prediction can change from one moment to the next, unfortunately there is corruption since scientists started getting subsidies.” (Karl Popper). You seriously haven’t done your homework buddy!!
@rajeshkamath822000 Жыл бұрын
What a privilege to be able to watch this.
@beefandbarley2 жыл бұрын
“If you don’t sin, Jesus died for nothing.” Brilliant
@romystumpy1197 Жыл бұрын
I agree
@josephwells8699 Жыл бұрын
Jesus took upon Himself our sin and died in our stead, so that we may live, and demonstrated that we can live without sin by allowing Him to live in us through His Spirit.
@josephwells8699 Жыл бұрын
@Scott Scotty I can't find my response to you now so I will answer your, what was the sacrifice? question. Jesus has always been the Son of God, before and after the sacrifice. When Adam and Eve sinned (disobeyed God) they became separated from God, Isaiah 59:2 "But your iniquities have separated you from your God; And your sins have hidden His face from you, so that He will not hear." God is holy He cannot embrace nor condone sin, and the word holy means set apart, and that's what happened when Adam and Eve chose to sin, they separated themselves from God. So being our original parents the consequences were that the separation affected their offspring including you and I. The Bible also says that, "the wages of sin is death." Romans 6:23, and they were told that if they took from the tree of knowledge of good and evil they would surely die, Genesis 2:17. Now, God could have put them to death, but He didn't. Instead He sent His Son and His Son was willing to come and live as a human among us, and take our sins upon Himself. Imagine that, a sinless being, the Son of God, leaving His heavenly abode coming to earth to live as a man among men, then taking upon His shoulders all the sins of the world. It was the sin that killed Jesus, not the fact of being nailed to the cross. But before He got to the cross He was humiliated, put on trial, punched, spat upon, whipped with bits of spiked metal attached to the whip, which tore into His flesh, and tore the flesh, probably to the bone. Then His body being in a very weak and painful state, He was made to carry His cross and at the place of the crucifixion, He was nailed to the cross, a crown of thorns pressed onto His head. Then when He was lifted up attached to the cross, it would have been dropped with a thud into the hole that it stood in, then to have a spear thrust into His side. You ask, what was the sacrifice? We haven't finished yet, as though all that wasn't enough already, He cried out "Father, Father, why hast thou forsaken me." It was the very weight of sin that separates that made Jesus cry out. Also apparently and understandably, the position that He was in on that cross made it difficult to breath and Jesus every so often had to place His weight on His feet, and in agony try to lift Himself in order to take a breath. Eventually He said, "Father into your hands I commend my Spirit," then He died. Crucifixion was a barbaric way to die, the pain was excruciating, from which we get the word crucifixion. So Jesus suffered and died for you and me but He could have decided not to, He could have summoned a legion of angels to come to His rescue, but He didn't, had He done so there would be no hope for anyone. What was the sacrifice? I believe one word would suffice....IMMEASURABLE!! Then on the third day, God the Father raised His only begotten son from the dead.....HALLELUJAH!!
@josephwells8699 Жыл бұрын
Everyone is a sinner, but you can be saved by God's grace through the sacrifice of His Son on Calvary. However, Jesus came to show that by His grace and by having His Spirit abiding in us, it is possible to live without sinning. It is only having a perfect character that is going to admit us into His Kingdom. So Jesus did not die for nothing, as you put it.
@josephwells8699 Жыл бұрын
@Scott Scotty We can all make claims that may not be actually true. You said that you are familiar with the doctrine, I question what doctrine you are referring to? You should have seen from what I communicated to you, that the sacrifice was..... 1. The perfect sinless Jesus left His heavenly abode to come and dwell among imperfect sinful, unworthy, human beings. 2. Jesus laboured for three and a half years, trying to teach these heart hardened humans, to whom they owed their existence, from whence they came, why they are here, and where they are going, (eternal life or eternal death). 3. After revealing His love and the love of His Father for humanity, and performing many miracles, they put Jesus to death in the most cruel way. 4. While on the cross Jesus experienced the weight of humanities sin, to the extent that He felt eternal separation from His Father, which is the end result of sin for anyone. 5. If Jesus had decided not to go through with it, none of us would be here. So that was the ultimate sacrifice, Jesus actually died in our stead, that we may have life, not just this life but eternal life, if we accept His sacrifice, and allow God's Spirit to live within us that we may be fit for God's Kingdom. 6 The fact that God the Father raised His Son from death does not deminish the death that Jesus experienced.
@theChrisCroft3 жыл бұрын
"I'm oppressed in 13 countries I would never go to anyway"
@stoppls17093 жыл бұрын
Lmaoooo
@shesheandtheblues62893 жыл бұрын
@karen kalantari so do I lol, Egypt 🤣
@pentuplove65423 жыл бұрын
One isn't oppressed if one hasn't been to those countries and been oppressed. That statement is nonsense.
@TheDoowllams3 жыл бұрын
@@pentuplove6542 are you just saying "oppress" is a verb? Cos you are right, but his statement is then only slightly incorrect really... it would work as a statement if he said: "I'd be oppressed in 13 countries that I would never go to anyway"
@kanguru7143 жыл бұрын
@@pentuplove6542 sure. And black people don’t get shot by police in the us because I am black, I have met police and I live. Also I ate bread today - world hunger is not true. Examples are really hard to grasp, one must be very clear if giving an example.
@shadabkhan30511 ай бұрын
I am Indian exmuslim, I listened a lot of rationalist people and understand basics of science and I realised religion is fake after leaving of Islam earlier I was little bit sad there is no heaven after life but ok now I am happy 😊
@DEEPMUCH10 ай бұрын
:)
@justinmac3167 ай бұрын
At least now you know that this life we have is the one worth living and aren't constantly yearning for death and "heaven"
@Bingobanana47896 ай бұрын
Where’s you evidence??
@gomani58665 ай бұрын
@@Bingobanana4789certainly not in a holy book of science..
@kathleenroberts69315 ай бұрын
All life is Energy ⛮ & energy never dies ❤ After a lifetime of searching, I experienced a NDE, Near Death Experience, I popped out of my body, wonderful experience. I came back inside my body, & remembered that "It doesn't matter if you are loved in this life, only that you love ❤😊 Happy 😊 Atheist 😊
@whaddoiknow65193 ай бұрын
Dawkins deserves enormous credit, as do Gervais, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and many others for taking on religious dogma and its often brutal oppression, but we should recognize the even greater courage of people like Bertrand Russell and G. H. Hardy for saying they were atheists when it was dangerous to do so even in England. Russell's writing on the subject are timeless, and as true today as they were a hundred years ago.
@rohitrohan20094 жыл бұрын
It is so lovely to see Richard Dawkins doing so well even when he's almost 80 years old.
@bradweir69934 жыл бұрын
@@westmidsmanandvan8022 Yours to dude.
@Kobi_893 жыл бұрын
@Evenson Alps Yes, you do soil yourself quite a lot at start.
@hedgehog1965uk3 жыл бұрын
He actually only lost his mother fairly recently twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/1183908617541562369?lang=en
@Kobi_893 жыл бұрын
@Evenson Alps I don't think you got my joke.
@rohitrohan20092 жыл бұрын
@Jeremy Grigson lool
@andrewmorton33443 жыл бұрын
Journalist's question: "Is there anything you won't joke about?" Ricky's beautiful rebuttal: "Is there anything you won't write about?"
@2fast2block Жыл бұрын
Yeah, Ricky will joke, but he's the real joke. "People who believe in God don’t need proof of his existence, and they certainly don’t want evidence to the contrary. They are happy with their belief. They even say things like “it’s true to me” and “it’s faith." Ricky Gervais Ricky does not know what biblical faith is because he just does not care to know. Biblically, faith means trust. It's a trust by evidence seen. God asks that we prove things. To reason. To get knowledge. To study. God has nothing to hide. We develop trust from what is seen, and that which is not seen yet is trusted also because of the trust built up from what is seen. It's much like a human relationship. We don't trust much until a person has gained that trust from what is observed. The difference is though, God is not limited to human powers. He created us. Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. crossexamined.org/biblical-faith-vs-blind-faith/ www.truthortradition.com/articles/what-does-the-bible-say-about-faith www.revisedenglishversion.com/Appendix/16/Faith_is_Trust www.truthortradition.com/articles/faith-a-confident-expectation-of-gods-promises-coming-to-pass www.truthortradition.com/articles/hebrews-1-11-and-faith Ricky can't even explain the start, creation, and yet he acts so smugly. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k
@connorsucks3847 Жыл бұрын
@@2fast2block real science DOES NOT IN ANY WAY say "everything we see must fit with what we know already" the scientific theory is quite literally about constantly attempting to disprove everything we think we know. I don't agree with Ricky on everything but he has a brilliant quote that roughly goes "If we burned every religious text on earth and then left it for 1000 years, none of those texts would come back. Because the basis for them is nothing. But if we burned every scientific text and left for a 1000 years each one would be back exactly as they were before because all the same tests would heed the same results". Obviously a 1000 years is a bit short but you get the idea. I personally think there is probably a god (or at the very least there is a being out there somewhere that could be interpreted as such) but I don't think a single religion on earth will ever ever ever come close to representing them. The very idea that anyone thinks they know exactly what a diety wants is insane.
@timberslut Жыл бұрын
@@2fast2block TL;DR.
@2fast2block Жыл бұрын
@It's not looking good well I see that some of my replies are shadow banned but not my original one. The reason you skipped it and didn't even attempt to prove me wrong is because you know you can't so you just want to mouth off as you can't give any evidence to back up your claim.
@crucix1483 Жыл бұрын
@@2fast2block You, a religious nut, want to talk about evidence? That's hilarious 😂😂😂 I'm not gonna argue with you, enjoy your imaginary friend.
@maxdavidyermolaev4164Ай бұрын
"Remember, if you don't sin, Jesus died for nothing"
@josejrtuti Жыл бұрын
"you can ridicule ideas without hurting anyone" great quote from Gervais, @ 1:01:25
@toddvandell852 жыл бұрын
"If people didn't invent gods, I wouldn't have to deny them." Ricky Gervais.
@trishlangford577311 ай бұрын
Brilliant. "And man created God in his own image and thought that it was good" oh boy all the troubles of the world followed that one
@straightline7610 ай бұрын
People didn't invent gods. In fact people haven't really 'invented' anything. Literally, everything emanates from the collective unconscious. Unfortunately, a real and pragmatic understanding of this concept is beyond this panel of two, mainly because they believe they know everything worth knowing. Ego will be humanities undoing.
@wilfullness10 ай бұрын
"Why would I ask Gervais about God?". - Me.
@MrJamesyboi1219 ай бұрын
@@straightline76 "they believe they know everything worth knowing" They spend a decent amount of time in this video saying the exact opposite. Did you even watch it?
@straightline769 ай бұрын
@@MrJamesyboi121 Are you an atheist?
@MichaelB_932 жыл бұрын
"why dont you put garlic over your door just in case theres a Dracula" 😂 Also I just love how much the host is into Ricky's jokes.
@steveluth31392 жыл бұрын
Thing is there is merit in his jokes here, they aren't just empty jokes about nothing.
@BunnyLebowski38D2 жыл бұрын
When I go shopping, I always put a string of garlic around my neck! I dunno about vampires, but it does keep away creepy men! ...except some Italian men.
@countdracula1977 Жыл бұрын
Khm...
@Redman680 Жыл бұрын
@@BunnyLebowski38D I can think of a couple of reasons why creepy men approach you......
@timberslut Жыл бұрын
@@Redman680 Hello? Just stay away from my ex-sister-in-law Bunny. She reports all these KZbin creeps to me- and right now, guess who appears to be #1. My axe is made of Titanium-Steel, and it is razor sharp. If Bunny wishes, I can easily deal with such people. And I do not need garlic, little man..
@marting.3045 Жыл бұрын
I really like the presenter! He has a very good sense of humor.
@BedsitBob Жыл бұрын
"His comedy often gives offence." You can't give offence. You can only take it.
@HolyMith3 жыл бұрын
"People jumping in the way of a bullet and saying 'why are you shooting at me?'" I've never heard someone encapsulate outrage culture so completely.
@Jay-jn6ul3 жыл бұрын
HolyMith and if that bullet was directed at someone else, and you had a bullet proof vest on? His argument is for bullets directed at ideas, not other people. I call out sexism and racism because, as a white male, I'm not emotionally injured by them, multiple scientific papers in psychology have shown other white males are more likely to listen to me, and it's the right thing to do.
@HolyMith3 жыл бұрын
@@Jay-jn6ul You missed the point. The proverbial bullets weren't aimed at anyone. He is referring to people searching for reasons to take offence, often on behalf of others who may or may not even be offended themselves. By your own admission, you "call out racism and sexism" because you have never experienced it yourself. I have no problem with people doing this, so long as they have actual evidence and reasoning behind it. Unfortunately, that is rarely the case in today's climate, rather it amounts to little more than witch hunting. As a side note, if you think a white male can't experience racism or sexism, you have misunderstood the very words themselves.
@Jay-jn6ul3 жыл бұрын
HolyMith nope, you've clearly missed the point and tried to make what he's saying fit into what you want to believe. Honestly I expected better thinking on an atheist video but here we are. He literally says he is attacking ideas, not people, and you choose to ignore that? Gervais doesn't makes sexist or racist jokes, because he knows they are offensive, regardless of whether the people mot affected by them call him out on it or their allies do. It's pretty tiring to be a woman and always have to call out sexism so sometimes it helps for men to do it too. Also I have a social psychology degree so I've literally studied the definitions of these things. They have systems attached to them, power dynamics. If I go to some female dominated society where all the women are women of colour and I am treated like a stereotype, denied jobs and constantly undermined because of my sex and race then yep, they'd be being racist and sexist towards me. In the western world now saying a joke at the expense of my race or gender does not oppress me in any way. It's not racism, it's not sexism. These things have bigger meanings than you're attaching to them, probably because you're so keen to try and find the people who are not arguing genuinely against them rather than seeing the reality. You're suiting your own worldview and being comfortable in it, dismissing genuine concerns with society just because you can't, or won't see them. Probably because they don't affect you. Well do some research on google scholar, look up some scientific papers on, among other things, identical CV's not making it to the second round of a job interview if they're entitled with ethnic sounding names or female names, and then get back me. I bet when you watched Christopher Hitchens' video defending free speech you misunderstood that too. He defends free speech as long as it doesn't cause harm, like yelling fire in a crowded theatre. Gervais is defending literally talking about firing bullets at ideas and you're twisting it to when those bullets are fired at people. Bye.
@HolyMith3 жыл бұрын
@@Jay-jn6ul Gervais makes offensive jokes because they are funny and he (naively) hopes that people don't take it too seriously and just have a laugh. People like you, who are ever-eager to get outraged and justify their farcical degree, are the ones he is referring to. He is making jokes, you are getting mad about it because you *want* to get mad about it, rather than just viewing it as comedy. You are trying to shoehorn your social preferences into comedy, where it simply doesn't belong. Someone makes a joke about rape? I might laugh, but that doesn't mean I think rape is okay, and I hope you have figured that out already. Employers are free to employ whoever the hell they want. It is their business and if they hire poorly, the business will suffer. If someone doesn't want to hire a foreign person because their english skills may be lacking, or a woman because it's a physically demanding job, then they are entitled to do so. You can't force businesses to hire people you want them to hire. Free speech should be defended up to the point of inciting violence and oppression, and people take extreme liberties with those criteria nowadays. This is the heart of the issue: people need to chill the fuck out and stop seeing the oppression boogeyman everywhere.
@skyhawk_45263 жыл бұрын
Not to get to deep, but in reality, it's even worse than that. I mean technically, you can't "jump in front of a bullet." By the time you could perceive the gunshot, the bullet is a half mile past you. So the people claiming outrage, in fact, weren't even the ones being shot at, nor do they know why the shot was fired. They have nothing in the game, and weren't even there, but yet they still claim outrage as if they were -- and sadly we listen to them, as if they were there or know the slightest thing about what they speak of.
@scorpion83752 жыл бұрын
I'm here to apologize and to thank to a great man that I've never met Richard Dawkins. Few years ago I was practicing Islam, as a person who had different point of view I was criticizing Richard Dawkins. I felt like that was a right thing to do, "defend my faith" But one day by mistake I have watched something about mutations. It got me interested... And then I went to mosque and asked my Imam about what he thinks about evolution etc. His replies were typical for an imam - oh you know, big bang etc. And who created big bang? And I was like... No this is not enough, this answer doesn't give me the satisfaction So one day someone told me this "Look we found out scientifically how big is our galaxy, then other galaxies that we can observe - our planet look like nothing else, nothing really special in that amazingly large cosmos, do you think someone would create something and then bothered to do all these bullshit that religions are talking about?" From that moment I realised that to believe in something that stupid I had to be stupid, then I realized that was my point of view of the world, that was my bubble with everything easy and everything explained. I have realised that every religion out there and philosophy if not based on evidences or is opposite science is all bullshit Now I want to thank Richard Dawkins for the information that he left in this world, I'm reading now Selfish Gene and few other books and I can say there is nothing more amazing than science. I wish I was better student in my class when I was younger there is loads of stuff I don't know and I want to know.
@honeychurchgipsy62 жыл бұрын
@ Scorpion - don't worry about not being a good student at school - you have your whole life to learn - I am a 60 year old embarking on a PhD. Oh, and thank you for sharing your story - I can't begin to understand how difficult it must be to find your way out of religion as you have.
@majmage2 жыл бұрын
_Scorpion,_ I don't think theists are stupid, just misled (and often in a "bubble" like you said). That's why it's important to me to try to help them out of those beliefs (and at the same time I also try to listen seriously to what they have to say, to make sure I'm not in a "bubble" of my own!).
@scorpion83752 жыл бұрын
@@majmage Yes we were all misleaded at some point in our life. But because I was raised in this kin of environment it make me se see faith or religion as a virtue as something everyone has, that it is normal to have faith and to to be week not having a faith... Now I see that... To understand science you have to know that you will die, as everyone - you will die and you won't live second time... No one will. Then science comes to people's saying " you will die, but if you reproduce your genes will survive, that makes your "code" immortal but you as you with all your experience... You will die. So live your life and learn and use it best as you can.
@majmage2 жыл бұрын
@@scorpion8375 Yeah true. Also the things that make us "live forever" aren't just genes. It's everything we do in life! All the people who invented the technologies (electricity, the internet, LED displays) that let us communicate to each other _are still improving our lives today,_ even if they're dead. That means that everything we do in life matters. That includes things that don't seem like they matter: after all, somebody grew the food and cooked it for Ben Franklin (who invented electricity) and _those people are also responsible for our electricity._ So even things that seem less important echo through eternity.
@scorpion83752 жыл бұрын
@@majmage Yes, agree on this one but I'll never invent anything I'm afraid 😅 - for now I take baby steps to understand world. For me leaving religion/faith (basically fairy tales) was like a start of new life.
@vidotter Жыл бұрын
Love that interviewer!! So enthused and keen with his discussion - and especially his ending call outs - almost WWF moment 😬🎉🎉🎉
@jackbozarth3 ай бұрын
As a person who grew up watching George Carlin. I have to say Ricky Gervais is this Generations George Carlin
@andreasunshine80022 ай бұрын
George Carlin is missed a lot 😢 but yes Ricky Gervais is doing a great job.
@fuckgoogle90619 сағат бұрын
Maybe but I think Chappelle is right there too, since he's come back to stand up he's been all about real stuff not the silly stuff he did with the Chapelle show
@lachazaroony3 жыл бұрын
"How do you make a good person do bad things? Introduce religion." - Christopher Hitchens
@schnibbler60853 жыл бұрын
you don't even need that much.
@exit56203 жыл бұрын
So according to Hitchens if it was not for religion to point out what is morality wrong, then it would be ok to do anything you want? Yet governments do the same thing? Gods morals are consistent, yet governments laws are always changeable. So if you take god given rights away, then you have laws that conflict with one another.
@schnibbler60853 жыл бұрын
@@exit5620 I see what you're saying.. communism and fascism aren't religions, yet between them they killed well over 100 million people.. No religion has ever killed that many.. Hitchens has got beef with religion, I see that. But I think the bone he's trying to pick really lies deeper in man than religion. We'd be shitty even without it
@FilosSofo3 жыл бұрын
@@schnibbler6085 I guess it all depends on your definition of "religion", and hence not truly worth debating. But if you take religion as all encompassing narratives that contain unverifiable metaphysical assertions intended to guide behavior. Then yes, communism, fascism, liberalism... are religions. Moreover, I would say that the "hate" for the theistic religions and the distaste for the mere word "religion" is just an indicator of the defeat of the theistic religions by the secular ones.
@schnibbler60853 жыл бұрын
@@FilosSofo So in this view then every man has a religion, including Hitchens. (as narratives must not necessarily be written to be adhered to). Hitchens would have vehemently denied that he is "religious", though he also believed in metaphysical assertions that also cannot be verifiable. Science must also be metaphysically interpreted. Hitchens meant supernatural deities and the dogma that goes along with it. Not the idols created by man, as he then would also fall into the category of worshipping one.
@ImGoingSupersonic3 жыл бұрын
Best way i heard it, "just because you are offended, doesn't mean you are right."
@ImGoingSupersonic3 жыл бұрын
@@topologyrob well when you become one of the worlds leading skeptics i might listen to you. Till then, why waste time commenting on KZbin, change the world and turn science on its head.
@edeledeledel54903 жыл бұрын
@@topologyrob Why would I bother to try to understand religion; I don't try to understand Astrology, or Homeopathy. When the basis for something is obvious crap, is it worth wasting any time on it.
@edeledeledel54903 жыл бұрын
@@topologyrob I've had 70 years of experience. I find it difficult to believe that any person who has studied science in any depth would consider the existence of any god to be a serious proposition. Studying nonsense is not scholarship. Believing in any religion is wallowing in a childish swamp of braindeath. You seem to define scholarship as studying religion. I must disagree; it's just a waste of effort.
@edeledeledel54903 жыл бұрын
@@topologyrob I don't care what you believe. All religion is bunk.
@Populous3Tutorials3 жыл бұрын
@@topologyrob please stop making yourself look dumb lol its 2020 not 900, smart people wont believe in gods draculas or flying unicorns
@MrsGreenDay1232 жыл бұрын
I love how Ricky always has a pint with him wherever he is 😄🍺
@davelister2961 Жыл бұрын
If that's a pint then he's a much bigger fellow than I thought!
@2fast2block Жыл бұрын
it destroyed his brain. What' Dawkins' excuse then? Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmjLY3uNmLmql5Y Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
@Redman680 Жыл бұрын
@@shenhaizz Don't breed
@mr.t9932 ай бұрын
Best Conversation I have listened to in a long while
@DeX9O23 жыл бұрын
“Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way.” -- Christopher Hitchens
@frenchy167853 жыл бұрын
I have a Tshirt with that on written on it. Great quote
@Jack-fs2im3 жыл бұрын
Dex Aetheists have been the biggest killers in mankinds history Hitler,Mao,Stalin.Pol Pot killed over 200m and you can add Dr Mengele why listen to these fools together.DOH
@dopeydonaldtrump37443 жыл бұрын
@@Jack-fs2im Despite the fact that your comment is really quite laughable, I feel compelled to correct you about Hitler who was a dedicated catholic and believed he was doing god's work.
@daviddeida3 жыл бұрын
Like smoking wont cause me death,
@Jack-fs2im3 жыл бұрын
DopeyDonald Trump no your the comic Hitler was a fanatical atheist enacting natural selection and survival if the fittest and with Mengele.hahaga here suck up the truth ir just stay stupid en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
@506Naz2 жыл бұрын
I’m 22 now and i became an atheist at a very young age not because anyone influenced me just because I thought one day “this shit doesn’t add up”
@2fast2block2 жыл бұрын
It doesn't add up because you don't think. Neither do these jokes. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
@Redman6802 жыл бұрын
@@2fast2block Bore off, you clown.
@Moluccan56 Жыл бұрын
High give.
@vampoftrance Жыл бұрын
Ive been with CFI since the beginning. They were there for me on my lonely holidays alone. Thank you.
@laurac8659 Жыл бұрын
Yes, learning is the key to happiness! I’m so happy I’ve found this community.
@divemylollol61529 ай бұрын
Learning evolution ? Still no evidence You dont know how the world began,so science can explain things, but not all, btw science believed the earth was flat before
@HaraldSletterod2 жыл бұрын
"If you don`t know the answer, Richard just say so" Comedy gold
@RyanReactsHQ3 жыл бұрын
Probably my favourite quote, what Hitchens actually said was “If someone tells me that I've hurt their feelings, I say, 'I'm still waiting to hear what your point is"
@oursecretlord90083 жыл бұрын
Get this bit right, atheism is when you tell me I need God I tell you I can get along perfectly well without him. - Hitchens. He was never a physicist or philosopher. The laws of nature require an ongoing cause, an end of the line of explanation, a singular concurrent cause, self-explaining, identifiable as God. He needs to show a Self-sustaining Source for all reality. It's in his own proof for atheism: 1. If God exists then God is all good and the Source for all reality. 2. Evil is real but cannot come directly from God (Who says? where's the *_LOGIC_* here?!). 3. Therefore God does not exist (no, the only supporting premise can't support this conclusion, and 1. is not really a scientific principle or a law that can be tied to the supporting premise in the conclusion. So, Hitchens claim of atheism has been vacated.
@RyanReactsHQ3 жыл бұрын
@@oursecretlord9008 how can a non-belief be vacated? Your comment is incredibly confused. There is nothing in nature that requires anything to identify as a "God" that is a human invention.
@georgedoyle79713 жыл бұрын
“Probably my favourite quote what Hitchens actually said was”. “If someone tells me that Iv hurt their feelings, I say, I’m still waiting to hear what your point is”. No offence intended but I think the bereaved families of the innocent civilians who died in the Iraq war, a war that Hitchens actually supported would beg to differ. Similarly, Dawkins lack of sensitivity to the suffering and feelings of the bereaved families who lost loved ones under eugenics in WW2 leaves most normal people very uncomfortable and suspicious to say the least?. According to Dawkins “It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology” (Richard Dawkins). Responding to a woman who said that she would face a real ethical dilemma if she became pregnant with a baby with Down’s syndrome, Dawkins advice was: “Abort it and try again. It would be immoral to bring it into the world if you have the choice.” Under pressure from huge public outrage, Dawkins issued one of his usual non-apology apologies leading to more public distrust and damage to scientific authority. Dawkins has become so obsessed with attacking religion and promoting the worship of (facts) “science”, he has lost sight of what we should be defending. Similarly, his “humanist” supporters also place the category “human” quite a long way down their order of importance, with things such as rationality, choice and discomfort. Human life can thus be easily traded away using their superior intellect and some emotionless utilitarian calculation. Interestingly, when it comes to eugenics, religion has a much more humane and better track record at defending the human than “science”. I hope I haven’t caused offence. However if Iv hurt your feelings.. “I’m still waiting to hear what you’re point is” All the best to you and keep safe during this Corona virus crisis.
@bayuistanto29643 жыл бұрын
69 like 😏.
@KeimpeJ3 жыл бұрын
@@oursecretlord9008 You mix things up a bit. What are quotes? They need to be identified as quotes. Which are your thoughts or beliefs need to be adressed as such. For me as a reader it is completely surreal what you mean. And sure you will say it is because i....etc. But it's not me, if you want to get your point across you have to state clearly what is a phrasing of Dawkins or Hitchens for that matter. I see you tried. And you hjave to tackle them point per point. I fail to see where your thought begins and another ends.
@andrewhaywood3853 Жыл бұрын
The lady’s joke about the C of E at the beginning was hilarious 🤣 absolutely accurate 🇬🇧
@tishtashyates26324 ай бұрын
The invention of lying is a firm favotite of mine. Funny, sad, interseting, and usually sparks a good conversation afterwards (and the occasional argument) 😂😂😂❤
@AfricanManikin3 жыл бұрын
18:50 is when Ricky enters and the talk starts after an incredibly long intro.
@zane45753 жыл бұрын
You just save me 18 minutes.. Thank you
@TheKid1029383 жыл бұрын
You deserve a VC for this feat. Thank you kind stranger
@KatJ3st3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. She sounded like she wrote that intro for a high school class
@mohammadkunwar3 жыл бұрын
There is a God indeed!
@bonairebound20093 жыл бұрын
IMO you should not skip Richard Dawkins’ introduction of Ricky which begins around 8:30. I actually watched that part twice.
@hopelessnerd66774 жыл бұрын
Ricky Gervais and Richard Dawkins. Click!
@MrNiceHk4 жыл бұрын
no brainier
@davidwhite48744 жыл бұрын
Click! Click! Bang!
@billiegrey58344 жыл бұрын
literally my 2 favourite people
@aristoteles62653 жыл бұрын
Ricky Gervais, instant click.
@richardwalton69933 жыл бұрын
HopelessNerd Haldane was optimistic too, until he experienced the real meaning of his cherished communist utopia.
@JH-ck1nr Жыл бұрын
Best religion ever that i was taught by my fantastic parents. If you go through life trying to treat people the way you would like to be treated, you won't go far wrong.
@Smithpolly Жыл бұрын
Except not everyone wants to be treated the way you want to be treated “One half of the world cannot understand the pleasures of the other.” ― Jane Austen, Emma
@Bingobanana47896 ай бұрын
Where did your parents get their moral grounding from?
@CRN24122 ай бұрын
Interesting, this is the Golden Rule, you find it in the Bible, Matthew 7:12 (NASB95): 12 “In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you"
@Mortthemoose19 күн бұрын
Nobody taught me that, but I completely agree.
@kunalkothari1005 Жыл бұрын
I got to the 6th or 7th grade. I got introduced to all the sciences and I got answers to questions that were backed by evidence. I finally came across something that can provide actually satisfactory answers and not just cling to the same version of words to explain how the world works. That was the year I gave up on my religion / gods. I'm an Indian so it was hard explaining everyone why but I did it anyway. Has to be the best decision of my life. So liberating.
@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors Жыл бұрын
Your personal beliefs are yours, I respect all opinions. However, science cannot prove or disprove a god/superior being/entity what ever you want to cal it.
@georgedoyle2487 Жыл бұрын
@@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors Exactly!! The fact is that most forms of organized atheism are attempts to fashion God surrogates. In other words, one of the paradoxes of contemporary atheism is that it’s a flight from a genuinely godless world. It is a flight away from relativism/moral subjectivism!!
@MrLcowles Жыл бұрын
As Pantagruel said 'let the good times roll'.
@anearthian894 Жыл бұрын
@@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors thats what atheism is... Leaving the gap of knowledge.....as just gap until we find out or atleast try to find or may be it will remain unknown forever Filling the gap with fairies has as much as chances of being right as any shit you can imagine.....which is infinite Asking someone to disprove a theory which has no proof is the lowest level of logic possible.
@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors Жыл бұрын
@@anearthian894 what I'm saying is there is NO prove either way, so it is one person thinking/believing what ever they. In other words, no one is right or wrong!
@voltz89453 жыл бұрын
Ricky Gervais is so smart and considerate, he's much much more compassionate than one would first seem.
@danielsup57143 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same
@hadleys.48693 жыл бұрын
Totally agree. Never would have thought that. That just drives home the point, that you really can’t judge a book by its cover!
@derp1953 жыл бұрын
Similar to Daniel Tosh. Really biting humor, but by all accounts really nice in person.
@chriskelly34813 жыл бұрын
Well, one can't EXPERTLY and consistantly push peoples buttons without understanding and emphasizing with them. Lots of Americans only know Gervais from his Golden globes presentations where he is in pure scathing mode. Maybe they've seen some of his stand up performances where he navigates through meticulously written comedy which is by turns confronting and absurdist, all the while being so intelligent and critical yet relatable. But if people watch his T.V shows and movies there exists a common thread through all of them of raw human emotion with an emphasis on friendship, kindness and everyday bravery. ❤Gervais😆
@karinlarsen26083 жыл бұрын
Somehow, I see Christ coming out in Ricky constantly. His love for nature / animals / Humanity. His high intellect, Jesus is in there, Ricky just can't see HIM
@thefenskes50203 жыл бұрын
Loving Ricky calling out *dogma* , "Dogma's the dangerous bit and it doesn't just exist in religion, it exists in more and more places now, that cult is in the _that which shouldn't be questioned_ ...if someone says you shouldn't question this, oh you've got to, you've got to question it." 👈 YES.
@adolphus283 жыл бұрын
Christians shouldn't have a problem with people questioning.
@adolphus283 жыл бұрын
@@tonyboleno8191 that's a shame. Life isn't a race. People fall and people can get back up.
@tonyboleno81913 жыл бұрын
@@adolphus28 whats that got to do with most christians not having a problem with people questioning?
@adolphus283 жыл бұрын
@@tonyboleno8191 what I mean is that even if the questioning leads one to fall. If this is the truth, you'd think that the Christians have a good chance to re believe.
@tonyboleno81913 жыл бұрын
@@adolphus28 you are incoherent.
@AppNasty Жыл бұрын
This was such a joy to watch.
@stevecowham1017 Жыл бұрын
Supernature. One of the funniest shows ever. Loved Humanity too. Ricky you're a proper gem. Got some good exercises for those knees mate.
@nicolotiraboschi3 жыл бұрын
Screaming a question from the audience when Ricky is talking is right on the edge between being extremely courageous and just crazy.
@sin33582 жыл бұрын
I thought it was embarrassing because they didn't have an answer afterwards 😭
@happi-bollox2 жыл бұрын
Downright rude..
@memphisdaniels3218 Жыл бұрын
Want to know what he said though
@ItsSVO Жыл бұрын
@@sin3358 they couldn’t hear him.
@katewheeler384 Жыл бұрын
He said something along the lines of “what do you think of the twins that were cloned to protect them against HIV?” …….I think.
@spanglelime2 жыл бұрын
"Am I optimistic? Well, I've got nothing to fear." This is my favorite part of becoming an atheist. No more fear. No more giving a damn what the skydaddy thinks or what's going to happen to me when I die or what happens when other people die. I felt so unburdened when I finally admitted to myself that I no longer believed and slowly realized everything that meant.
@daviddeida2 жыл бұрын
Satan is happy
@spanglelime2 жыл бұрын
@@daviddeida imaginary being has imaginary emotion.
@daviddeida2 жыл бұрын
@@spanglelime Indeed.An imaginary puppet thinks it has free will and has no fear. LMAO.
@_goyonder_48992 жыл бұрын
@@daviddeida do we not have free will? You chose to come to the comments to insult someone, and I chose to come here and ask you a question. So once again, do we not have free will?
@daviddeida2 жыл бұрын
@@_goyonder_4899 Using the scientific method,the same method for dismissing God,there is no evidence you have free will at all.You are a meat puppet. Choices are made by your genes and conditioning ,which you did not choose,before you are even conscious of the choice.The person you call yourself is an illusion, a construct.Do your research,Sam Harris is but one of many scientists who have come to this realization.I would'nt call "Satan is happy " as insulting him at all,so an apology would be warranted and accepted with such an accusation.
@Greedman456 Жыл бұрын
Platypus being able to make its own custard is the most hilarious and spontaneous thing I ever heard. Hahahhaah can't stop laughing
@slipp3ryslop3 Жыл бұрын
I don't know...I would call it spontaneous if Ricky just found out they produce milk and eggs, but he's the one who brought that up. He already knew that fact and had a joke about it prepared. I wouldn't call that spontaneous. Still funny!
@divanesh97911 ай бұрын
Ricky gervais has the most infectious laugh😂😂😂😂😂
@vikj12553 жыл бұрын
"if people didn't invent gods I wouldn't have to deny them"
@debaterofeverythingpresent27753 жыл бұрын
I agree and to add on to that. If people didn't invent freewill and sources of objective morality, Dawkins would be wasting his time preaching to slaves of physics. 3 cheers for abstract ideas.
@JahJahBruh3 жыл бұрын
Just like inventing racial opression disguised as marxism disguised as not working for the 1% to destroy the world economy.
@thestrikerfalcon2773 жыл бұрын
@@debaterofeverythingpresent2775 Nobody invented free will- will is an idea made by humans.
@debaterofeverythingpresent27753 жыл бұрын
@@ron4520 Men have the natural instinct to have intercourse with every woman in sight and women "apperantly" have the natural instinct to gossip. So unless you want to justify rape, I wouldn't reference natural instincts as source of morality. A mother who eats her baby can be acting on the hunger instinct and you can't reference "motherly instinct" to condemn actions arising from another instinct.
@debaterofeverythingpresent27753 жыл бұрын
@Azul Escarabajo I'm not familiar with "Nice" strawman. Did you coin that? Please explain so I can avoid making nice strawman arguments in the future. And since when does a person have to be dysfunctional to eat a baby? Lol Thanks for informing me that men have preferences, my mistake was assuming that was obvious. I now see how "sleep with every woman in sight" can give the wrong impression of literally sleeping with every woman in sight.
@ferrismesser2 жыл бұрын
Ricky is a national treasure
@mavis39162 жыл бұрын
Do you fancy him?
@ferrismesser2 жыл бұрын
@@mavis3916 yes
@kaze84472 жыл бұрын
I think he is an international treasure haha
@ferrismesser2 жыл бұрын
@@kaze8447 to be fair I think you may be right
@josephwells8699 Жыл бұрын
If Ricky Gervais is a national treasure, we are sunk. Please God help us.
@GetMoGaming Жыл бұрын
Ricky hits on a very good point about people not being able to grasp the scale of time involved with things like evolution and natural development, random chance, etc. Even some scientists struggle with this.
@SilverSurfer51508 ай бұрын
The scale of time… some scientists struggle with time, all Atheists struggle with the creator of time.
@GetMoGaming8 ай бұрын
@@SilverSurfer5150 And religious people struggle with the universe.
@SilverSurfer51508 ай бұрын
@@GetMoGaming What?! 😂 Struggle with the universe? Not a chance. Christians do not struggle with the universe. We understand it, and the one who created it. It’s Atheists who struggle with the universe. Christians have God and science. Science is God’s gift to us, as is the intelligence to understand it. Humans have not endowed themselves with intelligence.
@gbharan265 Жыл бұрын
One of the best discussions by my two favorite people and the host was just perfect too
@simay49773 жыл бұрын
"If people didn't invent God's, I wouldn't have to deny them" 😂👌🏻
@wideawake65013 жыл бұрын
Easy to say when you think are actually are one and your WORD is the only word........not
@30noir3 жыл бұрын
@@wideawake6501 So it's not easy to say? You want us to take you seriously when you can't even compose a grammatical sentence?
@simay49773 жыл бұрын
@@wideawake6501 Says "easy to say" then can't actually say it.
@simay49773 жыл бұрын
@Xavier Foisse And an eternal supernatural being is less magical? 🤣
@bobhoskins83063 жыл бұрын
@Xavier Foisse Atheists simply don't believe in deities. We have varying opinions on whence the universe arose, and those opinions are independent of our lack of belief.
@asraarradon41153 жыл бұрын
I remember purchasing the "Planet Earth" documentary series and hearing Oprah's voice instead of Sir Attenborough's. I immediately took the boxset back for a refund, and ordered the proper one online. Sir Attenborough is not only a british treasure, but a world treasure.
@kaemcolm54553 жыл бұрын
Agree with you, Asra, 100%.
@billy60443 жыл бұрын
Opera? Narrating planet earth? Blasphemy
@mr.mcbeavy14433 жыл бұрын
@@billy6044 "Opera?" ha ha.
@taniaearle44573 жыл бұрын
@me yep
@Charliefox713 жыл бұрын
Asra Arradon As an American, (as I assume you are) I agree.
@stevenpalmans2695 Жыл бұрын
I'm currently at 01:07:00 and i genuinly don't want this video to end.
@billscannell933 жыл бұрын
Man, that introductory speech from Dawkins was worth more than every Tony, Oscar and other cheesy entertainment award put together. What an honor.
@roxee573 жыл бұрын
“People try to give ideas human rights so they can protect them”. Quote of the night imo.
@AdamBechtol2 жыл бұрын
Aye, came to the comments just for this one. ( Ha took longer than I expected ) :p
@sweeno18776 ай бұрын
Ricky Gervais and Richard Dawkins go without saying, my admiration and all that towards them two.... The host/presenter of this presentation is one of the beat ive seen on any platform, just works so well with these two, but is also witty in his own right. Amd most of all just lets the guests speak aswell. I want to find more videos of this host. Overall fantastic, great presentation
@joshjackson678 Жыл бұрын
Ricky and Richard podcast!!! I’d listen all day
@fio-pz9ze4 ай бұрын
Frfr
@gregnew13 жыл бұрын
Death is like being stupid, only painful for others. Perfect.
@prophettoatheists80573 жыл бұрын
Who got this out of their imagination? This is painful to read.
@fukun57733 жыл бұрын
Boom
@__-cd9ug3 жыл бұрын
regarding the 3-doors thing, I agree with Ricky, there's only 2 doors "I believe there's a god" and "I don't believe there's a god". The "I don't know" part isn't a door, it's the room you're in. It's the room we're all in.
@sridharfc3 жыл бұрын
This is a brilliant insight. Yes. the third door is actually a room we're all living in! Thank you for the clarity.
@samehsafwat26573 жыл бұрын
Well explained
@2Uahoj3 жыл бұрын
Yeah Gervais got owned by the moderator on that one and even the audience was laughing at his ridiculous conclusion.
@sitas98273 жыл бұрын
Very well said
@Dennis199013 жыл бұрын
If you ask me "I don't know" is equal to "I don't believe".
@PaulSinnema Жыл бұрын
A Belgium Comic by the name of Urbanus once said: "We were there with the millions of us and we all rushed along this large tube and in the end I won.".
@chrisw57382 жыл бұрын
love how at the end they clap Ricky and he acknowledges it by praying 🙏 hahahahaha
@tommygunn27943 жыл бұрын
I'm very happy to be one of the people who managed to break free from myth and religion. I owe it to the internet and the people who devoted their time and effort to explain it to the people and improve civil society.
@andyarellanoChannel2 жыл бұрын
lost :-) you wild man.
@perpetualmotion3572 жыл бұрын
It also says a lot about yourself to seek the truth whether you wanted the outcome of what you found or not. It's much easier for most people to stay in their bubble of belief especially when most of ones family and social circle reside in it.
@pburnzzz9260 Жыл бұрын
You are better person than anyone.
@Thedrunkautist4 жыл бұрын
This is exactly what needed to show up in my recommendations and lift me up while in quarantine. I do have to admit that I am jealous of seeing a crowd of people together (pre-COVID) to watch Dawkins and Gervais.
@jenkem44643 жыл бұрын
Especially with all of the backsliding we're seeing with the US administration. It's really scary seeing the shift. If the Republicans win again in November, the danger of a Handmaiden's Tale style country is becoming all too real.
@Lilylibra3 жыл бұрын
Aaron NoneYa Indisputable. It is no wonder that Trump loves uneducated people, without them he’d be rumbled and never have been elected. Ignorance is a plague.
@Les5373 жыл бұрын
@@jenkem4464 And what do you get if the dems win and put a demented puppet in place? You are blind in one eye if you think biden is somehow holier than trump.
@Les5373 жыл бұрын
@Aaron NoneYa Reps have faith healing and dems have goop products, homopathic and lifestyle magazines. Two sides of the same coin of stupid.
@0MoTheG Жыл бұрын
Freedom from religion should be as big as freedom of religion.
@rexpayne7836Ай бұрын
What an excellent discussion. These guys are both at the top of their game. Great content and presentation. 🇦🇺 😊
@samiamgreeneggs372 жыл бұрын
Like every human ever born, I was born an Atheist, and have had the extraordinary fortune to have been raised by two Atheists to be a Humanitarian and a free-thinker. A thousand thank yous to Dawkins, Carlin, Gervais, Hitchens, Jillette, Fry, Adams, Silverman, Maher, Garofalo, Hicks, Blumner, Jeffries, Carr, Burr, CK, Black, Madigan, Sweeney, Allen, Hisri Ali, Izzard, Randi, Atkins, and Wiseman for being brilliant and outspoken.
@chrisl.97502 жыл бұрын
I wanted to say you forgot Carlin. Then I saw Carlin in the list and I realised you did mention Carlin so I didn’t tell you off for forgetting Carlin.
@tax16432 жыл бұрын
@John Smith I don't see a lot of gods preventing humanity from dying across the world either. Also, I would say that we specifically don't put our "faith" in man, since faith without evidence (ie. blind faith) is something we oppose. If Richard Dawkins or Ricky Gervais one day claimed that they know the meaning of life because they flew to Mars last night in their pajamas, and Martians told them the meaning of life was to eat raw honey, none of us would believe them without SUBSTANTIAL evidence. Science didn't make us and everything around us. Science is the repeatable process by which we learn about the universe. It isn't a force, not a person, not a will, it is a way that every person on Earth could, if they so desired, produce results that confirm the results that others have found. Science is just the method of "testing" our environment. Edit: If thinking about things after gathering evidence is the wrong way of going about learning something, what other activity would you recommend? Pretending? Wishing? Ignoring?
@midget4202 жыл бұрын
@John Smith you put your faith in an invisible skydaddy that never revealed himself, is all powerful but lets people suffer just because he can. A skydaddy that know what you want but wants you to get on your knees fore it.
@pburnzzz9260 Жыл бұрын
Oy vey
@cmmmmmmmw3 жыл бұрын
The idea that Richard Dawkins was sitting around (and apparently very much enjoying) watching a show with Karl Pilkington in it is almost too good to be true.
@jaca95613 жыл бұрын
Ahah what time was that at?
@wallomaie17526 ай бұрын
I’m the only atheist (to my knowledge) in all of my family. My family is full of pastors, worship leaders, some are even muslim. All go to church on Sunday. I am, for some reason, the only one that grew up in my christian family, never understood it, always asked questions, and wasn’t happy to just choose to believe. Almost sounds like my non-belief was an act of god.
@violettrojo10 ай бұрын
"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." Christopher Hitchens
@Notflix_TV_5 ай бұрын
Pithy and humorous a remark as it is, I always got the impression that Hitchens' battle with god was a battle with something within himself that he projecting out. Hitchens always had a vey clear idea of the 'God' he was targeting - which was almost invariably a sort personified and sentient 'man in the clouds' sort of being. A father, essentially. I've heard him mention Spinoza a few times in his talks and debates, but he doesn't really go all that in depth on his ideas. All the debates I've seen seem futile as everyone has a completely different conception of what they mean by god, and if a clear agreement on exactly what it is we are discussing cannot be reached, then everything that follows will be pointless.
@bu11etchucker3 жыл бұрын
Because the Platypus lays eggs and has milk, it could make its own custard. Genius, Ricky!
@DRW.13 жыл бұрын
Ricky is a different kind of intelligent to the other two. He can make anything relatable. Definitely one of the most relevent personalitys of our times. A wonderful human being ❤️
@metalslug45963 жыл бұрын
Its called acting, making the false seem believable. And people have fallen for it. Frankie Boyle (an atheist I actually admire) shows what arrogant idiots ricky and dawkins are
@cosicave51793 жыл бұрын
I quite agree, GUALADON. But I'll follow up with an alternative to Metal Slug: it is called NOT acting - certainly not in the normal sense of the word. That is the whole point. It is where integrity truly exists. Ricky Gervais is being himself. He is never 'pretending' or taking on the role of something alien to himself. And when in a role which might come under the standard heading of 'acting', he is ACTually using his 'act' as a metaphor for what he truly is…
@metalslug45963 жыл бұрын
Cosi Cave even if he is being truly himself, it doesn’t mean he’s right. I actually like speaking to people that have different beliefs and views so i can better understand them and then present my view and have healthy debate, the thing with ricky is that he’s too arrogant and thinks his world view is the absolute truth. That’s why he only has these kind of talks with people with similar views, scientific research shows that being an atheist is more likely to lead to depression and mental health problems. And because he says what he does with confidence people just blindly believe him. I like the office and extras (derek was horrible as was a lot of the films) but he should stick to writing tv shows
@DRW.13 жыл бұрын
@@metalslug4596 i see no arrogance in ricky, and i detest arrogance. People can believe what they like, but no one really knows anything for certain. When it comes to wether or not there is or isn't a God, i know that i dont know the answer, and i know nobody else has that answer either. No one can claim they know for certain, thus anyone attempting to is deluded.
@Irishmule1693 жыл бұрын
@@metalslug4596 Your being awfully dishonest...
@N.A._McBee10 ай бұрын
Wonderful, reasonable people having a funny gathering 😃 ! That's so different from today's standards...
@amanAMAN01 Жыл бұрын
I have not seen a better host than Richard Wiseman
@JohnA0004 жыл бұрын
Thank reason for comedians. I was a theist for 58 years, always questioning, but until I heard George Carlin say "Folks it's all just something somebody made up" it didn't occur to me it might have all been a monumental lie. That was the first nail in the coffin for me which finally led to my deconversion. Keep up the good work Ricky and Richard.
@joseacevedo83144 жыл бұрын
John A We will all miss Carlin and his hilarious wisdom.
@gstylez01074 жыл бұрын
Really? You heard a guy suggest that it might have been made up and THAT'S the first time you actually questioned it??? Fifty eight years, and you didn't once have that thought yourself..? Wow.
@xMarrilliamsx4 жыл бұрын
@@gstylez0107 It's probably a little more nuanced than that. There was probably little things piling up over time to have the epiphany.
@EmperorsNewWardrobe4 жыл бұрын
John A, comedians are the playful gatekeepers of rationality
@ancientfalmer43414 жыл бұрын
@@gstylez0107 I was thinking the same thing.
@normagruden3 жыл бұрын
Whenever Richard and Ricky do anthing together, any sort of interview or conversation, it feels like my birthday.
@jegannicco67853 жыл бұрын
Ifkr
@richardwalton69933 жыл бұрын
Haldane: the blundering political fool. I find it almost amusing that Haldane was called upon to support the platform of a scientist [Dawkins] who is clearly a supporter of the unelected, autocratic heads of Brussels. On top of the overt condescension attached to his public scolding of 17.4 million UK citizens, the premise of behavioural determinism - as interpreted by Globalists to justify unspeakable social engineering schemes and fraud - is entirely in keeping with the twisted agenda of these deluded souls.
@JA-gz1pe3 жыл бұрын
please watch to the end... kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZm6mo1pnr2Kra8
@aletheion Жыл бұрын
As a theist (Christian) I thoroughly enjoy the comedy of Ricky Gervais and the thought provoking comments of Richard Dawkins. It doesn't sway me from my belief in God, but it's a delight to hear their perspectives - even if they poke fun at my beliefs. I can laugh at the things they find funny or ridiculous and allow them to draw the conclusions they draw without backlash, offense or harsh criticism. Religion and science don't have to be mutually exclusive. Belief, whichever side of the fence you're on, does not need to hinder scientific discussion or discovery. I sit in the wonderful company of Babbage, Pascal, Morse, Newton and many others religious scientists. I enjoyed the video immensely and gleaned some wonderful thoughts from it and I do wish more "believers" would share my take on it.
@quantumjet253 Жыл бұрын
Neither Gervais or Dawkins have anything against someone believing in a god. Their real issue is with the way the 'belief' has been taken hostage by organised religions. It's the indocrination, forced rules, lies and stories used to justify 'god', scare people into 'believing' that they're really fighting against. We're all illogical to someone and equally we all accept we're surrounded by people who are illogical, we all have to accept that this will always be a fact of life amongst an intelligent species. As Gervais as previously stated on many occasions, both of you don't believe in any of the thousands of gods humanity has created over the ages, except you've picked one that he lumps in with the rest. There's never been a reason for you to not (almost) completely agree on everything with these guys, as your at least comfortable and confident enough to accept their attitude to gods is the same as you have for those invented by other religions.
@Hairmetallurgist11 ай бұрын
Although I enjoyed "The Office," I have to submit Ricky's "After Life" as his best work. The series run was brilliant, but the last episode was, probably, one of the best forty minutes on television, ever.
@maxlensherr6 ай бұрын
If you liked the mediocre UK office then that's a very bad basis for a recommendation
@Hairmetallurgist6 ай бұрын
@@maxlensherr Let people enjoy things. It's entertainment, not algebra.
@tibb8142 ай бұрын
I loved Afterlife. Brilliant on every level.
@nicksausley61983 жыл бұрын
I didn't think I could like Ricky even more, but then I saw him with a blue outline.