Have had that book for twenty years still on page 5.
@jimmcguffie29145 ай бұрын
Thanks for referencing/bibliography. Acknowledging the past masters doesn't diminish our learning, it just augments further learning!
@RayMcNamaraMusic5 ай бұрын
We’ll all be suspended in anticipation for the next episodes.
@DFish1115 ай бұрын
It took me longer than it should have to figure out that a major pentatonic scale is basically a major scale with no tritones. That'll definitely have an impact on tensions/dissonances! Thanks for yet another great video. ✌🏻
@Fretlessness5 ай бұрын
It's a big ocean! Everyday we're just trying to build a bigger boat I remember when that light turnt on for me! It helps demystify a lot
@fredblattner5 ай бұрын
@@Fretlessness 19:19 19:19 19:19
@Cross_Contam4 ай бұрын
A major scale is already missing the tritone. The major pentatonic excludes the fourth and seventh scale degrees of the major scale.
@DFish1114 ай бұрын
@@Cross_Contam There are two diatonic tritone intervals in a major scale. One built off the 4th degree, and one off the 7th.
@Cross_Contam4 ай бұрын
@@DFish111 I see what you're getting at. We are talking the same game just a different vernacular. I wouldn't label an interval as a tritone, I would say augmented fourth or diminished fifth.
@MIsweetshadow5 ай бұрын
Okay, this was an instant subscribe. I really hope that you will cover extensively how to use the LCCTO. To my knowledge, this would be the first time someone does that on KZbin. I saw you interview Ben Schwendener on another channel and I know you studied with him. Needless to say, that I really have high hope. I discovered the LCCTO in 2017 but it always felt as if I was missing something, hopefully you will at long last provide that missing part I've been searching for all that time. Can't wait to see what's coming :)
@lukievan5 ай бұрын
Fantastic work on this episode! Digging the vibe, and Russell’s theory was made easy to understand. Looking forward to more of this!
@oleksiishekhovtsov15645 ай бұрын
Hell yeah! Always wanted to dive into Russell's theory but never got around to it, so I have huge hope's for this series!
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
We’re gonna have some fun!
@leonardlevy88115 ай бұрын
Thanks , I loved the idea that the Ionian major scale was basically a IV, V , I progression. Gave me a hint to finally understand what Russell was about . I'm curious how to apply his theories to. modal jazz and how/why the modal music that was supposedly so influenced by Russell is usually based on minor chords not Major.
@KrystofDreamJourney5 ай бұрын
IMHO you made in this video one of the best condensed explanations of the basic concept for Russell’s theory, and you also provided a complete historical context ! I will recommend this video to my music students. Well done 😊 BTW : can’t wait for the continuation…
@AndrewJanusson5 ай бұрын
Please don't confuse your music students with this nonsense
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
@@AndrewJanusson A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men!
@jonathanwingmusicАй бұрын
Such a great explanation of this complex book, which is on my list to tackle next year! While recently studying the harmonic series, I myself accidentally stumbled upon the fact that the first 5x 5ths from a tonic (arranged across the keyboard as you showed) happen to make the penatonic scale when collected together under an octave! In the past year I've also been experimenting with "outside" pentatonics starting on different degrees, some more outside than others of course. I generally like the ones which are just a touch outside, a little spice. Some interesting overlapping observations which relate to the Lydian #4/11 - playing a major pentatonic scale from the 2nd degree above a major chord (e.g., D maj pentatonic over a C major triad) obviously results in an interesting Cmaj#11 sound (with the 7, 9). Then, if you play the relative minor pentatonic of that same degree, you'll start from the tonic's maj7 degree (Bm penta over C). What I like to do, then, is occasionally throw in the half-steps built from each of these scales whose only new additional color be a b9 (C# in this example), great as a passing/neighbor moment. Filling in the gaps, playing Em or Gmaj penta scales (same scale, starting on the 3rd or 5th of the major chord respectively), adds a bit of color but nothing surprising here, until we introduce the half-steps, in this case resulting in the #4/11 as well. And then if we play a minor penta starting from 4 (F#) you get a pretty close sound to the D/Bm with the C# above. And then obviously the pentatonic starting from the 6th would be the relative minor. This essentially accounts for all the possible chord scale degrees (with alterations of course; since 2 and 4 would normally be min/maj with the nat4). In my experiments and to my ears, I am discovering that major7 chords love the pentatonics I described above - maj from 2, min from #4, and min from 7. But then if you are playing a dominant chord, the natural versions sound better (min from 2, maj from 4, and min from 7). And then with minor chords, the qualities are just reversed in order. I haven't figured out how this all ties into diminished chords yet but... I hope all of that makes sense. I like thinking of it this way because it's an easier way for me to navigate these extensions and colors thinking about them as simply major and minor pentatonic scales starting at different places - where you can safely solo over a chord but enjoy adding a little resulting spice here and there - and Lydian seems to relate a lot to this! Anyway, I look forward to reading this book and diving into your series on it. Also: greetings from the LES! 👋
@LakkiPatey-t1t5 ай бұрын
Great! Looking forward to next episode 🎉
@lefteyereport63545 ай бұрын
It's amazing what he's accomplished while also being an F1 driver
@cattafish5 ай бұрын
LOL . .Not dissimilar in appearance, yet the F1 driver would be the equivalent of a fast bebopper who sadly missed the vertical aspects of the theory. The musician theorist was more like an astronaut and F1 driver combined !
@WinnifredJune5 ай бұрын
I've read the book and I'm really looking forward towards your rendering of it. Keep it up!
@jeremyarbitaljacoby71555 ай бұрын
Thank you! I had an essentially correct ( very elemental) understanding of the “Lydian” theory-but your in depth discussions have and are deepening the history and usages!
@petegreenwood27935 ай бұрын
Super well explained, great presentational style - loved it!
@Peter-sk5vg5 ай бұрын
Thanks. The clarity of your lesson is revelatory
@dingoswamphead5 ай бұрын
This is very clear and fascinating. Thanks Bob.
@mikecannon30445 ай бұрын
Really looking forward to this series. My own relationship with this book goes back to the 70s. Know it's skeletal to my playing. How much? Can't say. What did Wes ever do for my guitar??? What did Coltrane ever do for my flight??? Where did I lose track of George's book??? That one's easy - hurricane Katrina. Sail on Bob 👍💙
@hugovandermeer15665 ай бұрын
Thanks for this man. Opened up a better understanding for me as a tenor sax player. Look forward to part two 🎶🎵🎷✝️
@VCaamano2 ай бұрын
Best explanation I’ve heard. Thanks.
@cook-music3 ай бұрын
This was so brilliant. I've wanted to read this book, but this helped summarize things so well before I fully jumped in. Great work!
@Fretlessness5 ай бұрын
This is a terrific video! I'll be watching everything from here.
@boomerdell4 ай бұрын
Superbly explained, thank you so much for this! Your carefully walking us through the two-scales-in-one perspective, among other elements in all this, helped switch on a light in my mind. And I absolutely love the history and background, that adds so much. Very nicely done!
@femi_progressoi86985 ай бұрын
Beautiful lesson
@tomalleeson45735 ай бұрын
Good, good, good. Thanks
@clydespace4115 ай бұрын
When learning improvising by jamming over one chord vamps, I knew you could jam over a major triad theoretically--- with either the corresponding Ionian (major scale) OR you could jam on it with lydian. Both "work" but my ears always thought HEY Lydian sounds better than other way (at least when jamming on that single chord). Just like dorian sounds best to my ears over a one minor triad jam. This seems to do a good job explaining the math of WHY lydian sounds better. very cool.
@ts85385 ай бұрын
This is great! Thanks!
@jedtulman465 ай бұрын
I'm a George Russell o phile So armed w .my new piano I'm all in here!
@jazzwoodshed75745 ай бұрын
Very good episode 1!!! Looking forward to more episodes. :)
@thejazzguru5 ай бұрын
Bobby, great job on this. Due to the naturally occurring overtone series, there becomes a spiritual aspect to this concept as well. Original intended design if you will. I discovered these tones as a trombonist. It bothered me for years as to why the note "E" {above a high Bb} sounded when simply ascending in 1st position. The overtone series is the answer. Any simple pipe or tube will produce the same results. Connecting with these sounds brings a sense of unity and stability not found in using the standard root position major scale. Plus, it just plain sounds really cool for improvisation and composition. Looking forward to the next installment
@mcrumph5 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this and I am looking forward to the upcoming episodes. I do have one technical question, though; could you please use an acoustic piano next time? The levels of your electric sounded quite low & somewhat muffled/muddy. I think the strings of the acoustic would help bring out the clarity & brightness of the theory. I have only been playing piano for 10 months & while I realize this is WAY above my current level, I will let it sink in & percolate. I'll get to it at the proper time in my process. Thanks again & I wish you well.
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, but I was actually concerned the keys were too high in the mix. The quality may depend on the device each person is listening on, and you might get a clearer sound using headphones or different speakers. I don't have an acoustic piano in the studio, but I'll try to make sure the Rhodes is mixed in a way that makes the principles clear.
@ernietollar4075 ай бұрын
The Lydian Chromatic Concept - the infomercial
@CatrinaDaimonLee5 ай бұрын
my free blues lesson (taken down now) mentioned the blues scale as derived from the overtone series
@djmileski5 ай бұрын
Great video
@paulgibby69325 ай бұрын
Great stuff and presentation is very clear and well-developed. Eager to learn more. Thanks.
@jorgeleyton14745 ай бұрын
Fascinating... !
@kevinhateswriting4 ай бұрын
this is an incredible presentation of a very difficult topic
@jamessidney28515 ай бұрын
Very nice. Thanks!
@narutodarker3 ай бұрын
YO THIS IS SICK THANKS
@monkeyrater4 ай бұрын
I wish you had the camera over the keyboard so I could see how you were to turning the C major into an F/G tetrachord progression. Did you just press the F key and then play the C tetrachord and then after that press the G key and play the G tetrachord?
@paulrodberg5 ай бұрын
Very nice thank you for your teaching
@k.scotsparks92475 ай бұрын
...'very cool; thanks!
@ianwebb98595 ай бұрын
Thank you
@gargus62875 ай бұрын
fascinating lad this Russell guy. pretty quick on a race track too
@ChazJankel5 ай бұрын
very useful knowledge thankyou
@Dave_Hepler5 ай бұрын
Thank you!!!!
@MichaelBLive5 ай бұрын
This is really great! Thanks! Have you seen Oliver Pren's NewJazz channel? His video THE MODES: A basic Introduction with a Crazy Continuation... is really great. I believe it is relevant to this discussion. I am a relative beginner in comparison to Oliver applying the concept to guitar. Cool, Michael B
@marceli1552 ай бұрын
THIS BOOK I HARD TO UNERSTAND !
@martifingers5 ай бұрын
You probably will cover this in future episodes but does temperament affect the theory at all?
@RayMcNamaraMusic5 ай бұрын
Based on some of these comments I’d have to say people with pouty negative temperaments are absolutely repulsed by it.
@mbmillermo5 ай бұрын
Irving Berlin, one of the most successful songwriters of all time, composed everything in F♯ major using a transposing piano that allowed him to use a lever to change the pitch to any key (there is a KZbin video where he demonstrates this). Writing in F♯ means that the black keys form a major pentatonic scale, and one must go to the white keys for the leading tone (E♯) and the subdominant (B) (which together form the only tritone in the major scale).. The ♯4/♯11 in F♯ major is also a white key (B♯). I think that makes an interesting connection with the Russell "problem" of the white keys -- maybe Berlin got around it by focusing on the black keys and thereby focusing automatically on the first five tones of the cycle of fifths. There is no problem with the black keys.
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
I find the fact that Irving Berlin composed so many great songs on a transposing piano totally fascinating. Aside from that interesting and potentially inspirational tidbit, I don't see the Lydian Chromatic Concept as having anything to do with white keys and black keys, it's just about organization of tones. We could be talking about any key center on any instrument.
@mbmillermo5 ай бұрын
@@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic - didn't you make the video? In the video you talk about Russell 's fascination with the white keys of the piano and how he was obsessed with a problem he discovered in those white keys. Now, of course we could change the key center to any one of 12, because it's an equal-temperament system, and we'd have the same problem there. But if you think of it that way, then you miss the whole point of the white keys versus the black keys in Russell and Berlin's perspective.
@mbmillermo5 ай бұрын
I just fixed some errors in the text of my last reply. I had written it using dictation on my Android phone and I didn't notice that it had messed it up.
@paulmullins46765 ай бұрын
Bobby, I started playing trumpet about a year ago @ age 72. Now I have joined our Communiversity orchestra to play concerts with members who are university faculty and some high school band teachers. What they seem to do so well is read music perfectly and get the rhythm immediately. What can be done to learn this faster?
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
Hi Paul, I'm not sure you're gonna love my answer to your question, but as far as I can tell you've just got to do a lot of reading. Your best bet is to get a collection of pieces you can play, perhaps the "Art of Phrasing" chapter from the Arban's book, the Concone Lyrical Studies book, or any book of etudes, and practice sight-reading them using a metronome on a tempo that's just fast enough to keep you on your toes, but not so fast as to make the challenge impossible. Try to read just a little ahead of where you're playing, and practice reading through a piece without stopping until you get to the end for the practice. Then, review any tricky rhythms you run into. Over time you will start to hear the rhythms and melodies in your head before you play them. It's much the same as learning to read language, in which you start off sounding out complicated words until you intuitively know the meaning of combinations of letters. As somebody who mostly learned music by ear until grad school, sight-reading hasn't always come easy to me, but despite my efforts to come up with some effective methods and short-cuts, the only way I got better at it was to do a lot of reading. Good luck!
@paulmullins46765 ай бұрын
@@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic Bobby thank you for your reply. It shows you really care. My teacher sings every piece but my singing voice has been pretty bad all my life so that comes with difficulty.
@arjenland43745 ай бұрын
Nice! 2 questions (i'm soo impatient): could you not also see the lydian scale as composed of 2 groups of notes: one resolving to C and the other to G other? Your explanation of stacked fifths, C G D A E B F# Is a little puzzeling. G is the first overtone of C (when leaving out the octave C), the first overtone of this G overtone is D etc. Very nice theoretically, but what about the pretty clearly audible Bb overtone when hitting a C? The blues baby wants attention... but yesyes the F# is also a baby. I love babies...
@arjenland43745 ай бұрын
And also funny that there's always an E in the (lower part of) overtone series of the C, even if one plays an Cminorchord. The dissonance between E and Eb adds to the flavour of the minor stew?
@markyachnin19015 ай бұрын
I'm eager for the next video about this. Thank you!
@TraderXFiddler5 ай бұрын
I found the book useful as a student, along with patterns for jazz by Jerry coker
@bebopreview31875 ай бұрын
I'm interested to see if you get the same amount of criticism from members of the LCC facebook page members as I did in my video series on this subject with one of them even threatening me with lawyers when I criticized their interpretation. They don't seem to have found you yet - there is no link on their page and I've been blocked so can't leave a comment. You look off to a good start to me though and I pretty much agree with everything so far. 👍
@unknown63905 ай бұрын
Internet dorks are more scared than they are smart. Dont take it to heart that they act like that
@williamscottbauer18265 ай бұрын
Copies of the LCCTO are really expensive - any sources for reasonably price copy?
@monsterjazzlicks5 ай бұрын
I got part of the way through it, but was confused because there were seemingly multiple answers to some of the questions?
@cattafish5 ай бұрын
I hope this will be the definitive exposition of the Concept. Yet the final edition of the book doesn't encapsulate all that the Concept covers. The vertical ,scalar Implications of the chord went much further in the earlier editions and the horizontal, linear aspect was also dealt with. Sadly it would have taken at least six books to compete a thorough grounding in the LCC at this rate. That would have included the pan rhythmic world it opened up. Which IMO is at least as Important to its understanding. Caught between being bandleader, composer and an academic,under pressure from his detractors, the final edition of the spends too much of its time trying to justify itself as an after-the- event analytical device with historical examples IMO.
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
There's a lot to get to, and the rhythmic implications are both really interesting and probably beyond the scope of this series. I'm hoping to cover exactly enough info to make the rest of it discoverable, but I'm not sure I'll be able to fully cover horizontal and supravertical tonal gravity without making the videos too dense and esoteric. I'd love to check out earlier copies of the book! I'm always looking for them, but older editions are always prohibitively expensive. Thanks for watching!
@cattafish4 ай бұрын
@@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic Thanks for your reply. It's entirely understandable, given the lack of available documrentation that your series may not be able to cover these areas. I have the 1986 reprint of the 1964 edition and athough It covers a lot more ground than the final edition (and without the offputting terminology. ) it's still quite sketchy on the other areas. He goes into Ornette's melodic modulation and also the use of interval sequences in the "outgoing horizontal" chapter. He briefly touches on the formation of polytonal harmonic structures, saying it was to be the subject of a later volume.
@FablesOfFaubus5 ай бұрын
I always thought it was “tonal GRAVITY” did I have a different copy of this?!
@martinking17062 ай бұрын
I just take it as as another way of expressing and being able to use it when you feel you need it. In other words, it's just another tool!
@wprtube5 ай бұрын
Not sure why you went from 'here's the overtone series' to 'let's build up from C in 5ths' (12:04). I don't see the connection.
@remicou84202 ай бұрын
if i may give my attempt at an explanation, the part about the overtone series is there to establish the importance of the fifth, and how the interval reinforces the lower note. then, harmonizing a bass note with the fifth above it and then the fifth above that to reinforce that harmony note and so on is not a large leap.
@Classic_H_Radio5 ай бұрын
a drummer teaching this is wild lol
@dagadbm4 ай бұрын
do you beleive this is better than the barry harris way of seeing music with the diminished family?
@zdogg85 ай бұрын
Tip: Video stars @ 7:49
@rillloudmother5 ай бұрын
it took me so long to be able hear that F as dissonant.
@jonasaras5 ай бұрын
Russell’s fundamental problem was being constrained by key centers/circle of fifths, which is why he couldn’t get beyond the second octave. Lyle Spud Murphy used the overtone series as the basis of his theory. He used it both vertically AND horizontally. Ultimately, it is possible to voice-lead 12-note structures (no duplication of parts) none of which contain dissonance.
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
I don't understand what you mean when you say Russell couldn't get beyond the second octave.
@jonasaras5 ай бұрын
@@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic The harmonic structures don’t go beyond the 13th
@m.vonhollen66735 ай бұрын
@@jonasarasSo when you stack thirds, it goes 1-3-5-7-9-11-13 and then ends? After that you’d just be using a note that’s already been used?
@jonasaras5 ай бұрын
@@m.vonhollen6673 That’s only true if you’re using a 7-note scale. There are other ways to stack thirds and continue beyond that. Charlie Banocos had some ideas, that took it to 12 notes, but it didn’t conform to the overtone series, which made it erroneous IMO. It can be done without dissonance.
@loulasher5 ай бұрын
Are Murphy's or Banocos' ideas fleshed out in any books (or I guess videos)?
@alicehb16065 ай бұрын
Ugh Mr Russell’s class at NEC was sheer torture. Great musician but not a great teacher. Hated every minute of it, the most confusing book and music theory class ever. Book was bound with a cheap red binder and we had to pay 50 bucks for it, this is the late 80s! But had to click on this as I was so shocked to see this book in my KZbin feed.
@fragslap52295 ай бұрын
Never even HEARD of George Russell and after listening to this can't say I regret it.
@unknown63905 ай бұрын
Why
@celestialx2138Ай бұрын
this guy died on the day i was born and my name is russell
@zdogg85 ай бұрын
If making one's point, emphatically, was based on rocking back and forth while waving a bood on camera, you are the GOAT. Sadly, it is not.
@Kulah-SS5 ай бұрын
9:00
@FloydFreud5 ай бұрын
Interesting video, but either you need you be louder, or the musical interludes taken down a notch.
@claesvanoldenphatt99725 ай бұрын
12TET doesn’t let you play perfectly in tune in any key. They all sound pretty much as out-of tune because the harmonic series doesn’t yield a circle of 5ths but a spiral. Jazzbeaux really ought to get over their obsessions with pianos, go to vocal or horn music or synths that don’t play in 12TET. This Russel concept is based entirely on a misunderstanding of pitch. There is nothing objectively disjunct about the major scale. It’s merely a neurotic obsession.
@mer1red5 ай бұрын
This book is a disaster. It is very sad that this major toxic influence on jazz (improvisation) still lives today. Music is not mathematics, there is no (proof of) right or wrong. So it is easy to say that any criticism on that theory comes from not understanding it. It arose around the same period that classical music was evolving away from tonality towards a meaningless music based on intellectual gymnastics. I could make a video series that clearly explains why the flaws in the lydian chromatic concept result in an aesthetically inferior music. Just one advice for beginners: don't use this as the foundation for you improvisation, you waste your time on it. Even Miles Davis eventually turned his back on it and went in a different direction.
@hugovandermeer15665 ай бұрын
That's another perspective, and as valid as any other.
@unknown63905 ай бұрын
😂
@normanspurgeon53245 ай бұрын
There is no counter point, or resolution explained. It's all about playing notes "against" a chord. Shoenberg called these vagrant tones- they wander with no desination.
@AndrewJanusson5 ай бұрын
Music is LITERALLY mathematics, but I agree that the LCC is complete garbage.
@antixdobrasil5 ай бұрын
It's not totally garbage, it's useful somehow. Besides, it doesn't try to be a treatise, or a theory, or a law. It's a CONCEPT. For me, this book helped me to understand some chord progressions that the traditional or the functional harmony wasn't capable of.
@AndrewJanusson5 ай бұрын
Isn't this "concept" well known as pseudo-intellectualism? Kind of like Ornette Coleman's "Harmelodics" nonsense?
@jonasaras5 ай бұрын
That’s precisely what it is
@NadavHbr5 ай бұрын
I too label what I don’t understand as nonsense.
@AndrewJanusson5 ай бұрын
@@NadavHbr lmao ok buddy 👍
@RidgewoodSchoolofMusic5 ай бұрын
How would you define "pseudo-intellectualism" in opposition to legitimate intellectual pursuit? Obviously "a bunch of people don't like it" isn't a viable argument against a novel paradigm or explanatory model, or we could dismiss practically every revolution in science or philosophical thought through history from the outset. Even though I think systems of music theory fall largely outside the strict purview of science, the way I distinguish between valid explanatory systems and the broad umbrella of "pseudo-science" is to use Karl Popper's standard of logical falsifiability. I think the principles of the Lydian Chromatic Concept are logically falsifiable, so I regard it as a valid system. From there, there is a legitimate question as to whether those principles are true or practically useful, but addressing that question requires an understanding of the actual principles of the concept. Most people don't really know anything about this stuff, so one of my goals in producing this series is provide people with enough knowledge so that they are able to make interesting arguments against the principles of the theory rather than dismissing it wholesale out of ignorance. I'll address all of this in greater detail in episode 2.
@AndrewJanusson5 ай бұрын
@user-ks3ol3lw3b Never heard of him, guarantee you he sucked at playing though. You can make up any nonsense you want and pretend that it's deep or intellectual, not going to help you in the slightest. Have fun 🤡
@mikegeld12805 ай бұрын
How bout u start explaining the LCC ,and stop with the history lesson, I'm out 🥱
@EricMLopez5 ай бұрын
Miss you already
@mikegeld12805 ай бұрын
@@EricMLopez ok I gotta say ,I came back later to see what else you talked about, I see u finally got to the sht,I've been trying to get my head around this whole LCC thing, the second half of ur video isnt bad,,,I did have to watch several these to "fully " understand this thing ,very interesting ,I'm heading down a rabbit hole,cheers 👍
@EricMLopez5 ай бұрын
@@mikegeld1280 I didn't make the video, but am nonethless glad to hear you came back to it!
@unknown63905 ай бұрын
Admitting to everyone you lack an attention span and awareness of the seeking feature
@mikegeld12805 ай бұрын
@@unknown6390 admitting ur really not so good with people or public critique, 😏