[RMC - IBOX 2.0] W.O.T. // Next-Gen Hybrid Concept Showcase // NL2 Pro - 2K60 POV [Quick-Build]

A fairly loose design prompt, but not totally unguided:
[What Changes Might Be Made To RMC Design Language On The Next Flagship/Near-Flagship Scale Hybrid-Project?]
Slightly slower roll-rates: and with less instantaneous and varied roll starts and stops. (Less wear on track/supports/riders)
_Maintain: Spontaneity, Playful and Surprising Nature/Qualities
Greater focus on roll-thru elements: Integrated in such a way that does not inherently guide the design and features of the ride (in other words: not like a new Vekoma)
_++Element Related Rules/Info: Nudge towards a ride experience that includes multiple showcase/visual-landmark feature-elements. Hopes of increasing general guests interest and increasing retention of the experience. Elements may be able to be recognized by name or general shape from afar,
Move away (partially) from current: blended quick-maneuvers that, while impressive and effectively great, may be forgotten by the large majority of riders post-ride [self-adverting]
Impressive negative g features: the mildest negative g feature is -0.025G, sustained for a few seconds. Every other moment that uses negative G to physically shape the feature in question is beyond that, up to -1.275G (harsher in front/back car).

[@Zsullivan27]

1:07 hey you forgot to add the brakes. Lol

[@BurgerInATux]

Make a single hybrid with all the rmc hybrids combined into one coaster

[@IlysianOfficial]

the track is so slickkkk

[@benzo2952]

I want this in my home park 😝

[@ScootamonCoasters]

too bad

[@CoasterVision]

Me too!!!! Also in orange lol

[@charliegriswold1445]

Not exactly possible for me, my home park is canobie lake park

[@benzo2952]

@@CoasterVision ah bah je suis du var mdr alors orange ça me va 😂

[@tom-wl4gl]

Wrong support structure but awesome layout love it

[@KadskeDesign]

yeah it was a quickie, off camera mostly, I did try to add steel beams back into the inversion entry in the guise of RMC, or at least I made an initial an attempt at doing that.

[@tom-wl4gl]

@Kadske Design no problem awesome work

[@TheGinny415]

sweet design. do you use FVD ++?

[@KadskeDesign]

Almost! I use Newton2 (Multi Temporal/Force Vectors but controlling overall roll degree change, not roll rate (unfortunately). I much prefer the UI and experience for general force vector designing over ++, and wish I could implement roll rate in it.

[@TheGinny415]

@@KadskeDesign I'm gonna look into that, thanks. I started playing NL2 on my mac a few months ago and I'm wanting to be able to make smoother designs.

[@KadskeDesign]

@@TheGinny415 sorry for missing this. If you haven't already tried finding it, I've packaged it neatly with some examples for you to pull apart and tinker with to help you discover how the software works, and how to design temporally rather than geometrically (and when to use geometry instead of temporal-based design). drive.google.com/file/d/1nJvmYFRyvXCh-8gdL66on-11Hp_3m0y_/view?usp=sharing

[@TheGinny415]

@@KadskeDesign thank you!

[@KadskeDesign]

@@TheGinny415 No problem! After getting started and looking through what I've included, hit me up here if things aren't becoming clearer. I'll try to be prompt with any tips and tricks you need

[@lsky4446]

Stats?

[@KadskeDesign]

4053.54 ft 168.204 ft 4.72468 ft 67.8mph 90 deg hopefully that's not slightly confusing somehow without the data point the stats belong to lol