RNG decided the RECORDS I need to BEAT

[@smam7667]

Its so hard to judge how hard these times actually were because I dont know if it took him 10 min or 2 hours.

[@Scrapie]

Agreed, I sadly didn't have a timer on during this challenge it'll be back up for future ones. Total time for completion was about 9hrs 30mins

[@smam7667]

@@Scrapie no worries. Love the content mister scrapie man

[@Lee-One]

@@Scrapieah that’s nice I like the timers they’re good to know how long it took you. Also 9 hours to get top 0-100 on every map and PB is kinda crazy.

[@DanielHatchman]

@@Scrapie 9 hours is God speed. It takes me like 5 hours to get top hundred on ice and that's my strong suit.

[@de4ds1ghtcsgo94]

It was a challenge for him. He's a top100 player overall. If you can hit any of these times you're very skilled on that particular surface

[@maritzjanssens2805]

8:08 for a second i tought there was a real seagull in my house

[@carisiak]

Nice challenge:)). Feedback for the video, would be nice to have either the final position on each track somehow highlighted at the end of the track or to have a bit more time before the video cuts, on some maps I had to rewind to check. Also would be nice to see Scrapie's world ranking on the campaign after the 25 map.

[@Lee-One]

And a timer

[@Lee-One]

To show how long he’s been on each map

[@q12aw50]

@@Lee-One no

[@toolng1798]

2:40 me unintentionally wiggling and wondering why i get so much speed every 30 attempts

[@AndrewYac]

8:37 This was the moment when Scrapie decided to do a Le Mans 1955

[@mfnbpwnz]

In Athens, around 300 BCE, at the very beginning of what we now call democracy, elections did not involve votes in a way we would recognize. Instead, all the major positions of government, from the parliament to criminal juries, were assigned by a method called sortition, or election by lottery. A machine called the kleroterion used a sequence of colored balls to determine who would occupy which post. While we think of ancient Greece as the birthplace of our modern electoral system, the Greeks themselves considered this machine-enabled random selection to be the cornerstone of their equality. Aristotle himself declared, “It is accepted as democratic when public offices are allocated by lot; and as oligarchic when they are filled by election.” Millennia later, this randomness is absent not only from our elections but from our technology as well. According to the Ancient Greeks, this makes our machines incapable of being true agents of equality. True randomness is a slippery thing: It is a property not of things in themselves, like individual numbers, but of their relationship to one another. One number is not random; it only becomes random in relation to a sequence of other numbers, and the degree of its randomness is a property of the whole group. You can’t be random, in modern parlance, without having some shared baseline of normality or appropriateness to measure yourself against. Randomness is relational. The problem modern computers have with randomness is that it doesn’t make mathematical sense. You can’t program a computer to produce true randomness-wherein no element has any consistent, rule-based relationship to any other element-because then it wouldn’t be random. There would always be some underlying structure to the randomness, some mathematics of its generation, which would allow you to reverse-engineer and re-create it. Ergo: not random. This is a major problem for all sorts of industries that rely on random numbers, from credit card companies to lotteries, because if someone can predict the way in which your randomness function operates, they can hack it, akin to a gambler sneaking marked cards into the game. This is in fact the way many such thefts have been performed. In 2010, an Iowa State Lottery official manipulated the lottery’s random number generator in such a way as to be able to predict the draw on certain days: He picked up at least $14 million before he was caught. In Arkansas, the Lottery Commission’s own deputy director of security stole more than 22,000 lottery tickets between 2009 and 2012 and won almost $500,000 in cash, again by manipulating the underlying code that picked the numbers. To repeat, computers are incapable, by design, of generating truly random numbers, because no number produced by a mathematical operation is truly random. That’s precisely why many lotteries still use systems like rotating tubs of numbered balls: These are still harder to interfere with, and thus predict, than any supercomputer. Nevertheless, computers need random numbers for so many applications that engineers have developed incredibly sophisticated ways for obtaining what are called “pseudo-random” numbers: numbers generated by machines in such a way as to be effectively impossible to predict. Some of these are purely mathematical, such as taking the time of day, adding another variable like a stock market price, and performing a complex transformation on the result to produce a third number. This final number is so hard to predict that it is random enough for most applications-but if you keep using it, careful analysis will always reveal some underlying pattern. In order to generate true, uncrackable randomness, computers need to do something very strange indeed. They need to ask the world for help. A case study in true machine randomness is ERNIE, the computer used to pick the Premium Bonds, a lottery run by the U.K. government since 1956. The first ERNIE (an acronym for Electronic Random Number Indicator Equipment) was developed by the engineers Tommy Flowers and Harry Fensom at the Post Office Research Station and was based on a previous collaboration of theirs-Colossus, the machine that cracked the Enigma code. ERNIE was one of the first machines to be able to produce true random numbers, but in order to do so it had to reach outside itself. Rather than simply doing math, it was connected to a series of neon tubes-gas-filled glass rods, similar to those used for neon lighting. The flow of the gas in the tubes was subject to all kinds of interference outside the machine’s control: passing radio waves, atmospheric conditions, fluctuations in the electrical power grid, and even particles from outer space. By measuring the noise in the tubes-the change in electrical flux within the neon gas, caused by this interference-ERNIE could produce numbers that were truly random: mathematically verifiable, but completely unpredictable. Subsequent ERNIEs used ever more sophisticated versions of the same approach and closely followed the technological trends of their times. ERNIE 2, which debuted in 1972, was half the size of its predecessor and designed specifically to resemble one of the computers in the James Bond film Goldfinger. ERNIE 3, which followed in 1988, was the size of a desktop computer. It took just five and a half hours to complete the draw, five times faster than its predecessor. ERNIE 4 reduced that time to two and a half hours and dispensed with the neon tubes, using the thermal noise of its internal transistors, together with a sophisticated algorithm. ERNIE’s most recent incarnation, ERNIE 5, has since March 2019 been picking the Premium Bonds by examining the quantum properties of light itself. ERNIE maps the evolution of computers themselves over 70 years, from room-sized tangles of wires and circuit boards, through bulky mainframes and desktop boxes, all the way down to the development of highly specialized, microscopic chips of silicon with the ability to appraise individual photons. But each incarnation has done something few machines do: It has looked outside of its own circuitry, in order to commune with the more-than-human world that surrounds it, in the service of true randomness. In the intervening years, other creative ways of generating randomness with machines have been developed. Lavarand, initially proposed as a joke by workers at supercomputer firm Silicon Graphics, uses a digital camera pointed at a lava lamp to draw truly random numbers from the lamp’s endless, chaotic fluctuations. Online security firm Cloudflare, which protects thousands of websites from hacking and other disruption, actually put Lavarand to work: At Cloudflare’s headquarters in San Francisco, shelves lined with 80 lava lamps provide a back-up source of randomness for their digital servers. Hotbits, another hobbyist project, uses a radiation detector pointed at a sample of radioactive Cesium-137, which produces beta particles at random intervals as it decays. Random.org, a popular online source for true random numbers, started out using a $10 receiver from RadioShack to measure atmospheric radio noise; it now consists of a network of aerials and processing stations around the world. Each of these machines is admitting to the same flaw: Given the way we have constructed them, computers are not capable, operating alone, of true randomness. To exercise this crucial faculty, they must be connected to such diverse sources of uncertainty as fluctuations in the atmosphere, decaying minerals, shifting globules of heated wax and the quantum dance of the universe itself. On the other hand, they are confirming something beautiful. In order to be full and useful participants in the world, computers need to have relations with it. They need to touch and be in touch with the world. This stands in stark opposition to the way we build most of them today: systems of inscrutable, inhuman logic, comprehensible only partly by a narrow cadre of highly trained, and highly privileged engineers, and based on systems of extraction, manufacture, and use that damage the planet in multiple ways, from large-scale mineral mining, through the heat and greenhouse gases produced by server farms, to vast fields of electronic waste. But the use of randomness, both the processes it invokes, and the radical equality it makes possible, suggests it doesn’t have to be this way. We can reimagine our technologies-and our political systems-in ways which are less extractive, more generative, and ultimately more just. We might just have to get random to do it. Essaying

[@whatzittooya2713]

This made for quite an interesting read, thank you.

[@WrestleGermainia]

22:11 lol I need to see his reaction to getting 16th

[@emperorsascharoni9577]

Also on map 20 he litterally tied the record he had to beat and it wasnt in.

[@mighty_mulder4859]

I thought this was a super cool twist on the top 100 challenge. Really fun streams to watch!

[@ne6toto]

Fun concept and a great challenge, but I feel like the editing is once again lacking. It is not as bad as the world of wampus video, but editor-sir you have got to make what Scrapie's talking about make sense, we (the viewers) are laking a lot of critical information. Also as an example 24:50 is the perfect spot to insert a clip from the discovery video with Scrapie making the prediction that he is talking about for several minutes. @Scrapie please do something about this, your videos have so much potential that is being wasted currently.

[@samiraperi467]

8:08 That scream 😂

[@5ANDW1CHES]

Scrappie is so entertaining, who knew a 15 year old could be so witty

[@pseudo_nym]

Just out of curiosity - myself working with colleagues from *Tessenderlo* - judging your accent *you're from the german speaking part of Belgium* right? Me being German it sounds quite familiar 🙈 even if your english is quite excellent 👍🏼 By the way I know your Nickname from _Wirtuals_ Cup of the day Videos 😇 You're one of the *steady First division players!* *Fun to watch, keep it up!!!*

[@max_heyu]

Chatting it's a chatter from scrapie's chat

[@pseudo_nym]

@@max_heyu What do you mean? 🤔

[@max_heyu]

Well you actually guessed his location right and i though that you might have been trolling, and actually watching his streams every day, sorry

[@pseudo_nym]

@@max_heyu Ah got it - no really just discovered his channel 😁👍🏼

[@adamwright1176]

He's not just a consistent division 1 player he has the most COTD wins of any player by 30 wins, he has 84 wins and second, Granady has 54

[@FjfNStuff]

I like the background music much better than in some other videos which had some clown/carnival bgm playing. Good vid!

[@Lee-One]

41:54 yeah but it’s OKT 😂

[@guiilg]

I waited for this concept and I loved it, pls do more

[@szymsonekxd6915]

13:10 i can relate to that.

[@GenericTopHat31]

14:44 HOW DARE YOU INSULT MY ENTIRE CHILDHOOD

[@Bonde7280]

18:08 FOUL PLAY. We got scammed!

[@youtube-kanal2606]

37:54 awesome edit

[@keeskoole919]

Best thumbnail I've seen in a while

[@razorslazor6021]

Dear Editor, you can't just add Scrapie being mad at TTS, without showing us the TTS We are lacking critical information

[@PepekBezlepek]

people who have never played darts have no idea how much your hand will hurt from it :D I feel you

[@chancesirrom6549]

1:59 what does he mean by "no slide" here? im a new player can someone explain :)

[@Trep3]

you see how his car tilts when he does the sharp turns on that map? thats sliding, what he does at the start is "nosliding", where you steer at just the right angle where ur car doesnt lose grip and stays straight, its way faster at low speed

[@chancesirrom6549]

@@Trep3 so he's still steering but very little for a noslide to happen?

[@Trep3]

@@chancesirrom6549 not very little, it's like 70%, angle changes depending on surface and speed

[@ggbirdymill1618]

Great challenge. That was fun to watch

[@123einhundert]

Great video, keep it up! Does anyone know what happened to the skin of his PB (e.g. at 32:46)?

[@RenzeKoper]

He played a bit with the new "prestige" (or well AT) skin to show it off

[@mattbukovski92]

LOL at 37:55 😅😅

[@gagaspar1]

Hi scrappie! Can u tell me what type of controller u use? Do you have normal joystick?

[@alansmithee419]

41:18 Light my fire.

[@coopersaslave]

Bro can sing, lag and on. How 😂

[@madlad8417]

wth are those random burps 3:08

[@Sortac]

Nooooo... 😭 I was so hoping for an near top 10 roll on map 13 so I could watch you playing this crazy backwards strat. But not just that it rolled an high number, it also was recorded way before the crazy 24 sec time by medicine

[@fatdragin2782]

this was super entertaining! what if you tried to go for champion medals next scrapie? 😏

[@dimitarlyubenov726]

Why Kevin de Bruyne plays trackmania? He's really good though :)

[@sandqwert]

Really nice challenge, good content!

[@Gainn]

one of the biggest reasons this game sucks for free players is not being able to train maps (unless they're not password locked). Allowing F2P more access would boost the player base hugely.

[@toolng1798]

14:00 such an annoying gear

[@amp4105]

shouldve put the map 23 #19 before the #18

[@wekkes123]

include tts sound its just really weird when he says random shit, plus it ads to the video. now it a bit annoying without it

[@Scrapie]

sadly it's impossible to split the TTS audio line since it's main PC audio which includes music that i'm playing on stream

[@Palandos78]

@@Scrapie I guess it would be possible to add TTS again while editing if editor manually records the TTS and inserts it at the correct point in the video. But dunno whether that extra work is worth it. Anyway, I felt this video had great energy from you and the edit effects on the random number rolls made me laugh a lot. Keep it up :)

[@emperorsascharoni9577]

How do we Not See his reaction to tieing the record on 20?

[@TurdTM]

Thanks for another banger

[@Crystalblood2903]

You should have Done for examinerad if you’re PB is top 25 you should have Changed it to 10-25 instead of 10-100

[@kiwiciwi123]

LISSEN , very fun challenge !

[@MidnightPausch]

43:00 this aint it chief.

[@chestnutsoup9960]

Guuut vid

[@Lee-One]

Why is there one map you didn’t get top 100 on?

[@q12aw50]

He lost his spot while recording

[@anonymous7704]

Great video

[@youtubered4402]

theres no way 90% of the numbers rolled were 90+

[@radix2830]

Fun Challenge.

[@alexiz.7569]

Come to South Africa scrapie ill play darts with you

[@salvadorvillarreal1643]

Top 10 challenge when?

[@prospect2664]

Why between 10 and 100 and not 1-100??

[@Trep3]

I'll give you a bit to think of the answer to that question

[@prospect2664]

@@Trep3 because he is bad at the game?

[@Trep3]

@@prospect2664 ah so ur just trolling, gotcha

[@prospect2664]

@@Trep3 nope... its just not a record, if you dont hold the nr 1 spot...

[@Trep3]

@@prospect2664 "the best performance or most remarkable event of its kind.", therefore your best performance, is your personal record

[@Skylledge]

Nice

[@vinayakprabhuk2375]

2 jan is my parents anniversary

[@oscarsalazar2652]

I was born Jan 2 and I have eproof

[@sratnatozmrde]

I liked other thumbnail more

[@jannis11]

naice

[@Krdn570]

Essaying

[@bshepard8591]

2 jan here 4 bday

[@dirtycamping]

:)

[@luminance69]

E

[@Lee-One]

Why do the chat always say 🖕🏼KZbin like I’m genuinely curious.

[@Winter0192]

Elitist culture

[@Trep3]

it's just a meme, yt vs twitch wars are a thing for some reason, so chat memes about it

[@mfnbpwnz]

because we twitch viewers are dumb sheeple and once one person does it we all copy paste it. You should join a livestream some time and see just how dumb we are.

[@crystal13244]

The waffle House has found its new host

[@mattvasilev9618]

good content but random number was fake

[@Winter0192]

?

[@q12aw50]

😂😂what

[@Trep3]

this was livestreamed my g

[@mfnbpwnz]

Congratulations for winning the brain-dead comment of the week award.