Play War Thunder now for free with my link, and get a massive bonus pack including vehicles, boosters, and more: playwt.link/aviationdeepdive Feel free to join our Discord community! - discord.gg/WCevgcufwJ Consider supporting us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/AviationDeepDive
@ivanstepanovic13277 ай бұрын
Yugoslav pilots at that time had no tracer rounds, so those victories were scored without them, making the feat even more impressive. Also, Yugoslavia had several 109s purchased from Germany before the war broke out.
@williamkoppos70397 ай бұрын
Well done. Thanks for the non-computer narration.
@TheLateBird77 ай бұрын
Once again, with your thorough and engaging coverage in text and images, you have made me appreciate and even grow fond of an aircraft that would otherwise have remained a historical footnote to me.
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
Thanks, appreciate that!
@boltezarziherl94517 ай бұрын
2 notes. At the time of engagement Yugoslav air force used both Hurricanes (licensed build) and BF 109 E, whats more they did extensive trails and mock up fight between all 3 types of fighters, so they knew weaknesses and strengths of each fighter, that would explain relative success against Luftwaffe. Secondly, while IK-3 died at the start of WW2, its development and improvements would be fund in postwar production of S-49, a fighter born out of Yugoslav/Soviet clash (Infrombiro).
@fifi23o57 ай бұрын
Another interesting fact. In early 1941 they tested a Hurricane with DB 601 from Me-109. Results were quite promising and flight characteristics improved. But then 6th of April happened...
@nrudnjanin7 ай бұрын
@@fifi23o5 Yes. It was designated LVT-1. And there was internation to test IK-3 with RR Merlin from Hurricane...
@beyondrecall94466 ай бұрын
By knowing their strenghts and weaknesses, they made the "Hurrischmitt", by putting the DB-601 in the underpowered Hurricane
@eddiepires39986 ай бұрын
Great research, good video. I learned something today . Through your video, we aviation enthusiasts get to know an otherwise forgotten fighter. 😊
@vespelian57697 ай бұрын
Fascinating. I have never heard of this aircraft.
@Curious-Minds7 ай бұрын
Yes!!!! morning coffee and Aviation Deep Dive. NICE!!
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
Enjoy! :)
@elennapointer7017 ай бұрын
There's a real Moraine-Saulnier/Hurricane vibe to this little beauty and it's a shame it's not more well known.
@Lord.Kiltridge7 ай бұрын
I have put this plane on the list for possible additions to War Thunder. All but one of my submissions would be rank one, 2.0 or less, but at least they entered service.
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
I agree, it'd be awesome to see this in war thunder!
@guidor.41617 ай бұрын
Reminds me of an MS 406 but is much more elegant and streamlined
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment
@MisterOcclusion7 ай бұрын
It does have a strong French vibe
@jonathanhudak20597 ай бұрын
And throw in elements of a Yak-1
@jonathanhudak20597 ай бұрын
Great topic! I've always liked the lines of this cool little Yugoslavian fighter. Reminds me of a cross between like a Hurricane and a Yak-1. Cool aircraft too bad they didn't have a lot more of them on hand when the Germans invaded. Time to build my Azur kit! 😊
@borissljukic14706 ай бұрын
That's not the end of that plane. It later returned after WW2 as the Ikarus S 49.
@lancerevell59797 ай бұрын
Very reminiscent of the Dewoitine D-520.
@MrCateagle7 ай бұрын
The IK-3 evolved into the postwar Ikarus S-49 with a Soviet engine and a bubble canopy.
@nrudnjanin7 ай бұрын
The S-49A had Klimov VK-105 and later S-49C had Hispano engines bought from France.
@joesutherland2257 ай бұрын
One I hadn't heard of ,thanks!
@damienmaynard88927 ай бұрын
What about the IK-2 Ikarus? Fought alongside Yugoslav Furies and then along with some Croatian Rogozarski R-100's. Ik-3 appears to have elements of the Hurricane, Yak-1 and MS.405 - parallel evolution?
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
The IK-2 is definitely another aircraft I'd love to cover
@dude1267 ай бұрын
Very interesting post. Thank you.
@guidor.41617 ай бұрын
I believe that is a Dora shown @1.11, but could be Bertha or Cäsar?
@neilturner67497 ай бұрын
It’s a BF108 trainer isn’t it?
@guidor.41617 ай бұрын
@@neilturner6749 No definitely an early model 109
@colinhooper19337 ай бұрын
Very Hurricane looking, both at the same crossroads of design
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
The D.520 did indeed also use a Hispano Suiza 12Y engine, the cowlings certainly have some significant similarities due to the shape
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn39357 ай бұрын
A better wing than Sydney Camm’s modified Clark Y fat aerofoil (originally fabric covered) choice for the Hurricane.
@zlatanclovecic19447 ай бұрын
The engineers of the time obviously learned from each other. The plane is a bit similar to Morane-Saulnier MS-406 or Czechoslovak Avia B-35 (same engine and similar construction methods), Dewoitine D-520 (same engine, but full-metal), Hawker Hurricane (similar construction methods, but different engine). Note that Yugoslavia was close ally with Czechoslovakia and cooperated on defence industry as well. The HS-12 Ydrs was the best engine available for both countries at the time and was produced in license in Czechoslovakia. This might be the reason for using it.
@edfisher87257 ай бұрын
Clearly not as strong as the Hurricane or Dewoitine
@nrudnjanin4 ай бұрын
@@edfisher8725 wrong! It was better than hurricane and Bf-109E-3
@slekic7 ай бұрын
It looks like a lot of other fighters of the era, but it was actually inspired by the Dewoitine 520.
@lachbullen80147 ай бұрын
It kind of looks like a hurricane..
@fatdad64able7 ай бұрын
„Spitsky fireovič“ seems far more capable than the Morane Saulnier….406? with (I believe) the same engine
@eddiepires39986 ай бұрын
Yes agree, the nose section does remind me of a Spitfire , the rear tail section resembles the French Morane Saulnier and the fuselage and canopy a little bit of Hurricane 😊
@FRIEND_7117 ай бұрын
There's a reason in the aviation world the phrase "If it looks right, it is right" exists.
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
And do you think the IK-3 looks right?
@FRIEND_7117 ай бұрын
@@aviationdeepdive You bet your ass X,D Honestly could have been one of the best fighters in the world.
@zadzad43537 ай бұрын
And dont forget the also famous phrase.. "IF IT WORKS..IT WORKS.."😅
@WarblesOnALot7 ай бұрын
G'day, Yairs, that'd be right, too ; d' y' know that...? And it turns out that the Only tricky aspect lies in Knowing What, precisely, exactly (prezactorily - even)..., "Right..." Looks Like....! To an observer sufficiently handicapped by Dunning-Kreuger Effect, who Affects to be an Autodidactic Revolutionary Genius of the Homegrown variety...; even such things as the Notoriously Ugly and Hopelessly Un-Airworthy "Christmas Bullet" have been thought to "Look Right"...(!). Look merely at the point that Shareholders paid for the Bullet's Construction, and then the US Army Air Corps Supplied it's Powerplant, free - "on loan". Knowing what looks Right Is really vital. Such is life, Have a good one. Stay safe. ;-p Ciao !
Nice instruments and layout at 8:50. Particularly compared to many of the Soviet fighters.
@Otokichi7867 ай бұрын
5:13 War Thumper ad ends.
@zadzad43537 ай бұрын
When looks From the sides.. IK3 looks like a SOVIET MIG 3 and u.s P40 WARHAWK/KITTYHAWK.. And from a far, a bit like BRITISH HAWKER HURRICANE too... Kinda..😅
@jonathanhudak20597 ай бұрын
Reminds me also in the nose section of a Yak-1 too
@audionci7 ай бұрын
@@jonathanhudak2059 Indeed, the 1st version of post WW2 S-29 (A version) was a revamp of Ik-3, re-using a later version Yak-1 engine (the Klimov VK-105, that was itself a Soviet development of the Hispano-Suiza 12Y that powered the original IK-3)
@jonathanhudak20597 ай бұрын
@audionci pretty neat I didn't know there was a post war variant of the IK-3. I bought a book on the type, started reading it a few years ago and got sidetracked lol. Thanks for sharing 👍
@guaporeturns94727 ай бұрын
Can tell the designers were trained in France. Look at the tail.. and the cowling… and everything.
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
They could be somewhat convergent evolution design decisions stemming from the French engine
@guaporeturns94727 ай бұрын
@@aviationdeepdive I think the Rogozarski design team actually went to France and got some "training” there.
@GeorgeRuffner-iy7bm6 ай бұрын
I enjoyed this video. Thanks for posting it. 🙈🙉🙊 😎 🇺🇸
@av79877 ай бұрын
On the base of IK-3 afterwar desing a prop driven S-49 intercepter/ groundatrack airplanes was produced and used till sixtiess in post war Jugoslavia.
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn39357 ай бұрын
What do you mean by a ‘tail spin’? Time 8:34.
@markaxworthy25084 ай бұрын
Score 11 victories, or claim 11 victories?
@neilturner67497 ай бұрын
Editing error: I think the photograph at 1:11 is of a BF108 trainer and not a BF109 fighter..…either way it’s definitely not a BF109E as labelled
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
It is a Bf 109, but I believe it's a B model
@wirralnomad7 ай бұрын
Definitely a 109 not a 108, but certainly an early iteration, most likely a D but also possibly a B or a C.
@geordiedog17497 ай бұрын
Funny how a lot of planes of the time kinda all look the same in an inline/radial binary way.
@JulienGardner7 ай бұрын
Don't play War Thunder, it's a frustration based game.
@SQSNSQ7 ай бұрын
Gitgud
@mikepette44227 ай бұрын
metrric still sucks
@aviationdeepdive7 ай бұрын
If metric sucks, I shudder to think what you think of imperial