🎹 Roland FP-E50 vs Roland FP60x | Side-by-Side Digital Piano Comparison, Review & Demo 🎹

🛒 Get the Roland FP-E50 HERE ▸ www.merriammusic.com/product/roland-fp-e50-digital-piano-arranger/
🛒 Get the Roland FP60x HERE ▸ geni.us/Roland-FP-60X
🛒 See More Roland Digital Pianos HERE ▸ geni.us/Roland-Digital-Pianos
💕 Subscribe to Merriam Pianos HERE ▸ bit.ly/SubscribeMerriam
🔔 Click the 🔔 bell to be notified of all videos! ▸ bit.ly/SubscribeMerriam
#RolandFP-E50 #RolandFP60x #DigitalPiano
0:00 - Video Introduction on the Roland FP60X v.s. Roland FP-E50
0:21 - Opening Playing Demo on the Roland FP-E50
0:39 - Opening Playing Demo on the Roland FP60X
0:56 - “How does the Roland FP60X still fit into the marketplace?”
1:37 - Piano Tone Review
3:44 - Roland FP-E50 Stereo Microphone Speaker Demo
4:23 - Roland FP60X Stereo Microphone Speaker Demo
6:26 - Piano Sound Spec Slide
6:36 - Piano Action Review
8:10 - Piano Action Spec Slide
8:20 - Additional Tone(s) Review
10:24 - Additional Playing Demos
15:56 - Final Thoughts
17:55 - Features and Connectivity Spec Slides
18:21 - Closing Playing Demo (Stereo Mics v.s. Line-Out)
Greetings! We’re back with another piano shootout as we pit the Roland FP-60X against the new Roland FP-E50.
Is there still a place in the market for the 60X in light of the new E50? Let’s find out!
Overview
The 60X has occupied a unique middle ground in Roland’s portable digital piano lineup, but with the release of the FP-E50 for a lower price but some overlapping specs, it’s fair to wonder just how the 60X now fits in.
Understanding the exact differences, particularly with regard to speaker performance, is really key to understanding this question. It’s of course also important to understand if there are any differences in piano tone, action and features as well. Let’s start with piano tone.
Piano Tone
Both pianos are using the sample-based version of Roland’s SuperNATURAL engine, with 256 notes of polyphony and driven by the BMC chip. Playing them side by side, we’re actually hearing a difference with the 60X coming across as more dynamic, sensitive and nuanced.
We strongly suspect this is a result of different speaker configurations and some differences in digital signal processing. The speakers are more powerful on the 60X, and it seems to us like it’s a higher-quality pair here.
Both pianos have the same onboard parameters available for editing the piano tone, however, the 60X is compatible with Roland’s apps, such as Piano Designer, which unlocks additional parameters. The E50 conversely is not compatible with the apps.
Piano Action
Both pianos are equipped with Roland’s much loved PHA4 action, which features a triple sensor and escapement. These actions should feel identical right? Interestingly, this is not the case.
The 60X has a more robust construction with regard to the case, while the E50 has some steel reinforcement, but in general, the case is just less substantial. As a result, the 60X’s keybed feels stiffer and more solid, which in turn affects how the action feels to play.
So, even though we’re dealing with the same PHA4 action, it does feel better on the 60X.
Additional Tones
When it comes to sounds beyond the core piano tones, the E50 blows the 60X in terms of quantity because it is also equipped with the ZEN-Core sound engine.
ZEN-Core is a synthesis engine Roland released a couple of years ago and it’s essentially a simulated analog synthesizer system.
The 60X then has a respectable 358 built-in sound, but the E50 has more than 1,000, and this can be expanded even further via the Roland Cloud.
Piano Functions
The 60X has an onboard tactile EQ and upper + lower mixer, as well as an array of function keys. The E50 also has a variety of function keys, as well as a mixer, but no tactile EQ. This seems to speak to the fact that the 60X is a little bit more focused on on-stage use.
The E50 instead has some legit arranger features, such as a live arranger and chord sequencer. There’s a basic arranger available with the Roland app on the 60X, but it’s not as extensive as the E50s.
The 60X does have a built-in USB audio interface, so that’s a nice benefit.
Both pianos also have a mic input and mic volume control, but the E50 adds vocoder and harmonizer effects.
Both pianos can also play MIDI and Audio information off of a USB key, and you can record on both machines. Both also have ¼” line outputs, a stereo mini line in and dual headphone jacks.
Closing Thoughts
So, does the 60X still have a place in the market? Definitely, the physical experience of playing the action does feel better on the 60X, and the speakers are delivering more detail and nuance. The piano-playing experience is just noticeably better on the 60X than on the E50.
Connect with Merriam Music:
● Website ▸ www.merriammusic.com/
● Contact Us ▸ www.merriammusic.com/contact/
● Instagram ▸ merriammusic
● Facebook ▸ MerriamMusic
● Twitter ▸ merriammusicinc

[@douga8296]

Thanks so much for this review! I was waiting for this.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in! :)

[@ciarel]

Impressive review by Stu as always. But I also want to thank the video and sound editor (if it's not Stu himself)! Your editing skills are truly remarkable! The way you seamlessly synchronize the audio and visuals creates an immersive and engaging experience, making us feel as though we are in the same room as Stu. Your attention to detail and artistic vision truly shine through in your work. Thanks and keep up the amazing work! 🎶

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thank you for taking the time to check out the comparison! I will be sure to pass on your incredibly kind words to both Stu and our talented videographer and editor, Lee. :)

[@dcoch2000]

Thank you for this comparison!

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thanks for tuning in! :)

[@rafailbounar26]

Just ordered the roland fp E50 and I'm very happy!

[@MerriamPianos]

That's amazing! Congratulations on your new FP-E50! :)

[@jorjajorjan3863]

How is it? Was it a good purchase? Any pros and cons?

[@rafailbounar26]

I'm super happy it's so good and the key action too​@@jorjajorjan3863

[@sonicairmusic]

I’ve owned and used my lovely Roland FP80 for several years, and more recently I’m using the Yamaha P115, which I do regret buying, because the keybed is glossy plastic, not a patch on my FP80, which is the stunning ivory feel PHA4! The Yammy gets sticky and unbearable to play live after about 30 mins! It’s going. I mainly just piano & a string pad is all I require, so me thinks the Roland FP30X will be a better option, plus it’s also lighter. Great review and love the detailing throughout. 👍🏻🎹👏🏼

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much! We appreciate it. The Roland FP30X is quite the powerhouse for the money and will be far more familiar feeling to your hands given your experience with the FP80. :)

[@pianoman_JP]

Stu, great analysis as usual, I'm happy with my 2 year old rd88 that's 8 lbs lighter -- I'm 77 & still gigging! How about a comparison of E50 with rd88?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! That's amazing John! The RD88 is a powerhouse instrument that is perfect for gigging! :) Also, thank you for the suggestion! We will do our best to compare the FP-E50 with the RD-88. That would be a very compelling comparison!

[@MediaGrope]

Excellent review as per usual. To my mind, it's do one thing well or versatility of sounds on the other. For me, it's the quality of nuanced sound that wins with the fp60x

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much! We appreciate that immensely. The FP60X sounds fantastic - that is for sure! And that is a very good way to separate these two exciting models from Roland. :)

[@paulsarodh5460]

❤ thq vry much ❤😍

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you for watching! :)

[@Roberto-qb2dj]

l'esperienza di Stu è totalmente condivisibile anche per me. Non ho provato il fp60x ma il fp30x side by side con l'FP-E50. Ad un primo impatto le plastiche utilizzate nella costruzione dell'FP-E50 sono piuttosto economiche, migliori quelle dell'FP30x pur avendo una costruzione molto simile. Non mi ha convinto neppure l'uscita cuffie del FP-E50, il suono era veramente piatto e asciutto, mentre gli accompagnamenti suonavano bene. Con gli speakers interni l'FP-E50 suonava complessivamente meglio dell'FP30x. Credo comunque che chi vuole un buon suono deve avere speaker rivolti verso l'alto altrimenti le frequenze medie e alte si perdono. La soluzione migliore come sempre è un PA.Grazie Stu per questa recensione sempre molto attenta e precisa. Un saluto dall'Italia.

[@MerriamPianos]

As always, thank you for taking the time to tune in and share your thought! The Roland FP-E50 doesn't quite have the same piano experience as the FP-60X, but it is hard to deny the cost-to-value ratio it presents with its impressive feature offering. At the end of the day, they are different tools for different jobs. :)

[@Instrumental-Covers]

I just came from two music stores and was pleased to find the Casio PX-S5000, so now I have an opinion about it regarding its sound and action. I also played the Roland RD88, FP90X, FP30X, F701, Casio CDP-S110, CDP-S360, Kawai KDP75, CN29, CA49, Yamaha P45, P125, P125a, P515, YDP-145, YDP-S55, YDP165, among other models. Playing a model in person is quite a different experience from the perception I form before I see them in person. Specifications can also be very deceiving. For example, you would think the Roland FP90X is super loud with its 60 watts of amplifier power and the Yamaha P45 should sound really quiet with its weak 6 watts amplifiers... but I turned them both to their maximum volume in the store today, and the P45 sounded much fuller and probably even louder than the FP90X.

[@MerriamPianos]

It is always a good idea to test things out in person as spec sheets are ultimately just words. The physical and in-person experience as well as a player's connectivity to the musical experience provided by an instrument will certainly always be paramount. :)

[@alexp2082]

So, what are your thoughts on Casio PX-S5000 as compared to other models you mentioned? Thank you

[@Instrumental-Covers]

​@@alexp2082 Hi, I feel Yamaha and Kawai have better options around that price point.

[@alexp2082]

@@Instrumental-Covers Ty for reply, I'd really appreciate your feedback on px5000 though

[@Instrumental-Covers]

@@alexp2082 Thank you for asking me. I find the wooden inserts in the plastic keys of the PX-S5000 a nice aesthetic addition to the PX-S1100, but the feel of the keys is still not substantial. The piano samples that Casio put in their digital pianos are not very realistic to my ears, and their speaker system is weak, particularly it doesn't have bass due to its design. But these are just my impressions, it is hard to say anything objective that everyone will agree on when it comes to digital pianos. Hope that helps.

[@GregH.252]

iOs App Store shows FPe50 now compatible with Roland Piano app version 1.4.0 also need to update the FPe50 to version 1.20 (Feb 2024)

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for the update! That is very exciting news! :)

[@thetribunal8363]

Tips for buyers on competition Yamaha DGX - 670 Pros - 4 style variations/ better style programs/ reads PSR style files with 4 variations ( there are thousands if free styles) Can write user styles/ more realistic and musical styles that can be used/ can play midi files ( Roland can not) 40 plus Super Articulation sounds ( best nylon/ acoustic guitars / saxes, etc that Roland or Casio can’t touch) Will read midi files ( including Roland ‘s GS and Yamaha’s XG files). Remember most pro GM files are written in GS format) Has 16 track sequencer Cons- heavy/ bulky/ GHS keys ( not as good as Roland) . Not gig worthy ( screaming “amateur keyboard)/ no vocal harmony / no modulation wheel/ only headphone out/ no separate LR outs Korg XE- 20 Light weight( 25 Ibs)/ terrible key touch and response/ PA80 arranger styles/ will read SMF/ Wav/ Mp3 files but poorly designed for live playback. No joystick/ pitch bend/ mod wheel/ PA 80 arranger styles means 2 fills and jumpy fills / no style writing/ has basic sequencer Roland FP- E50 Pros - great key feel/ individual weights ( key response not as fast as Yamaha’s GHS for fast notes runs due to escapement mechanics for certain patches but great for piano tones - better piano tones ( than Yamaha or Casio) - pro looking keyboard on stage ( well designed/ no speakers on top or front) -individual LR outs - Vocal harmony - 37 pounds ( lightest pro feel/looking arranger with build in speakers) - blue tooth midi and audio - chord sequencer Cons- Can’t read or write midi files ( only Wav files) . That means you can’t play pre sequenced general midi files with VH data) - other sounds ( non super natural tones)are good enough but not great ( especially saxes/ guitars still has Juno Di / Ds quality) . Not super articulation quality - arranger feature is afterthought and style are poorly written ( limitations start to appear if you are One Man Band / solo performer) - 2 style variations means 1990 era backing with improved sounds ( you will not be able to load even BK3 styles which has 4 variations) Overall verdict- There is no competition in the market.great if you need one keyboard that has 88 keys and pro piano sounds and other acceptable sounds with manageable weight that has pitch/ mod wheels . Looks great as well. For OMB players;You just have to load wav files and play and sing on top while using real time harmony by pressing chords in real time Unfortunate for Casio. Which is still not considered as “pro” looking/ considered KB on stage ( regardless how they improved with the sounds, etc, the stigma is still there). It may take a decade and multiple endorsements.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for taking the time to check out our channel and share your insights! We appreciate it. :) The only thing I would add is not to write Casio off. The PXS portable piano models are fantastic, particularly the newer models like the PXS6000 and PXS70000. These are more than suitable for pro-level performance and gigging players will appreciate their portability.

[@steffencapello]

impressive review, thank you. Kawai ES520 or Roland FP-E50 when it comes to key feel and piano sound?

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thanks for tuning in! It really comes down to personal preference. For me, I favour the Kawai ES520's piano sound as I find it to be a bit more authentic sounding, but I would give the edge to the Roland FP-E50 in terms of the action's authenticity.

[@carldaynolo1]

i can feel Stu enjoys the demo on FP60X more than the other 😄

[@MerriamPianos]

The FP60X certainly provides an improved piano experience, but the FP-E50 is a very different animal given its impressive feature offering. :)

[@traumsegler40]

Hi Stu. Great review of these two instruments but as you said it the FP60x is more for piano players and when I would like to do some arrangements I put it in my mac like seconds because of it`s included audio-interface. Does the FP-E50 also has this audio-interface ??

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in! We appreciate it. The FP-E50 has a USB audio interface as well. :)

[@Iceland874]

I wouldn’t have known about all these options without finding these videos today. All the information on the different models has been tremendously helpful. One problem- I need a music holder. Which have an attachable music stand? Thank you.

[@MerriamPianos]

We're glad you have found our videos helpful through your process! Both of these models have an attachable music rack, which comes with the piano. :)

[@zacsonskaria]

Great review! Considering the piano experience and value for money, do you think it's worth recommending the FP-E50 over the FP30x to a beginner? The price difference between them is approximately $150, with the FP-E50 being the more expensive option. Your expertise in this matter would be highly valuable.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks! We're glad you enjoyed the review. The core piano experience isn't too different between the FP-E50 and FP30X, but, I suppose, there is an argument to be had for the additional features and sounds that come with the FP-E50. These types of elements can help freshen up practices and keep a beginner student engaged and motivated. Thanks and hope this helps! :)

[@sonicairmusic]

I am looking forward to trying out the FP30X, and potentially purchasing it, as it’s lightweight, has the lovely PHA4 keybed and as it’ll be put through my KC150 Roland amp, the actual small downward facing onboard speakers aren’t a game changer for me. It’s mainly for wedding and corporate piano solo bookings, which is why I don’t need all the bells & whistles of the other pianos. Just a few nice piano sounds either the very nice keybed 😊

[@therat3028]

A comparison of the FP-E50 vs the Yamaha DGX-670 would also be needed, i think.

[@MerriamPianos]

That comparison is also in the plans. Stay tuned! ;)

[@klo151]

Yes! would definitely want to see this comparison...

[@thetribunal8363]

Here you go- Yamaha DGX - 670 Pros - 4 style variations/ better style programs/ reads PSR style files with 4 variations ( there are thousands if free styles) Can write user styles/ more realistic and musical styles that can be used/ can play midi files ( Roland can not) 40 plus Super Articulation sounds ( best nylon/ acoustic guitars / saxes, etc that Roland or Casio can’t touch) Will read midi files ( including Roland ‘s GS and Yamaha’s XG files). Remember most pro GM files are written in GS format) Has 16 track sequencer Cons- heavy/ bulky/ GHS keys ( not as good as Roland) . Not gig worthy ( screaming “amateur keyboard)/ no vocal harmony / no modulation wheel/ only headphone out/ no separate LR outs Korg XE- 20 Light weight( 25 Ibs)/ terrible key touch and response/ PA80 arranger styles/ will read SMF/ Wav/ Mp3 files but poorly designed for live playback. No joystick/ pitch bend/ mod wheel/ PA 80 arranger styles means 2 fills and jumpy fills / no style writing/ has basic sequencer Roland FP- E50 Pros - great key feel/ individual weights ( key response not as fast as Yamaha’s GHS for fast notes runs due to escapement mechanics for certain patches but great for piano tones - better piano tones ( than Yamaha or Casio) - pro looking keyboard on stage ( well designed/ no speakers on top or front) -individual LR outs - Vocal harmony - 37 pounds ( lightest pro feel/looking arranger with build in speakers) - blue tooth midi and audio - chord sequencer Cons- Can’t read or write midi files ( only Wav files) . That means you can’t play pre sequenced general midi files with VH data) - other sounds ( non super natural tones)are good enough but not great ( especially saxes/ guitars still has Juno Di / Ds quality) . Not super articulation quality - arranger feature is afterthought and style are poorly written ( limitations start to appear if you are One Man Band / solo performer) - 2 style variations means 1990 era backing with improved sounds ( you will not be able to load even BK3 styles which has 4 variations) Overall verdict- There is no competition in the market.great if you need one keyboard that has 88 keys and pro piano sounds and other acceptable sounds with manageable weight that has pitch/ mod wheels . Looks great as well. For OMB players;You just have to load wav files and play and sing on top while using real time harmony by pressing chords in real time Unfortunate for Casio. Which is still not considered as “pro” looking/ considered KB on stage ( regardless how they improved with the sounds, etc, the stigma is still there). It may take a decade and multiple endorsements.

[@Richard-po4jq]

One more very good review, thank so much. And now a comparison between the FPe50 and the Casio PX S 3100 could be very interesting, don´t you think ? Thank you

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! We will certainly be releasing more comparison videos feature the new FP-E50. :)

[@thetribunal8363]

Yamaha DGX - 670 Pros - 4 style variations/ better style programs/ reads PSR style files with 4 variations ( there are thousands if free styles) Can write user styles/ more realistic and musical styles that can be used/ can play midi files ( Roland can not) 40 plus Super Articulation sounds ( best nylon/ acoustic guitars / saxes, etc that Roland or Casio can’t touch) Will read midi files ( including Roland ‘s GS and Yamaha’s XG files). Remember most pro GM files are written in GS format) Has 16 track sequencer Cons- heavy/ bulky/ GHS keys ( not as good as Roland) . Not gig worthy ( screaming “amateur keyboard)/ no vocal harmony / no modulation wheel/ only headphone out/ no separate LR outs Korg XE- 20 Light weight( 25 Ibs)/ terrible key touch and response/ PA80 arranger styles/ will read SMF/ Wav/ Mp3 files but poorly designed for live playback. No joystick/ pitch bend/ mod wheel/ PA 80 arranger styles means 2 fills and jumpy fills / no style writing/ has basic sequencer Roland FP- E50 Pros - great key feel/ individual weights ( key response not as fast as Yamaha’s GHS for fast notes runs due to escapement mechanics for certain patches but great for piano tones - better piano tones ( than Yamaha or Casio) - pro looking keyboard on stage ( well designed/ no speakers on top or front) -individual LR outs - Vocal harmony - 37 pounds ( lightest pro feel/looking arranger with build in speakers) - blue tooth midi and audio - chord sequencer Cons- Can’t read or write midi files ( only Wav files) . That means you can’t play pre sequenced general midi files with VH data) - other sounds ( non super natural tones)are good enough but not great ( especially saxes/ guitars still has Juno Di / Ds quality) . Not super articulation quality - arranger feature is afterthought and style are poorly written ( limitations start to appear if you are One Man Band / solo performer) - 2 style variations means 1990 era backing with improved sounds ( you will not be able to load even BK3 styles which has 4 variations) Overall verdict- There is no competition in the market.great if you need one keyboard that has 88 keys and pro piano sounds and other acceptable sounds with manageable weight that has pitch/ mod wheels . Looks great as well. For OMB players;You just have to load wav files and play and sing on top while using real time harmony by pressing chords in real time Unfortunate for Casio. Which is still not considered as “pro” looking/ considered KB on stage ( regardless how they improved with the sounds, etc, the stigma is still there). It may take a decade and multiple endorsements.

[@Frank-in-NY]

Quite an in-depth comparison. Excellent! You wouldn't think a couple of watts, and speaker direction would make such a big difference. Odd thing, there appears to be a difference when using the line outs. You'd figure that would be the same, but I can hear the difference. The FP-60X is much clearer, and has a richer tone. As much as I prefer the FP-60X, the bang for the buck of the FP-E50 is still on my list. Before I pull the trigger, NAMM is a month away, I want to see if there is any competition to the FP-E50. As always, thank you to Merriam Music and Stu Harrison for these outstanding reviews & demos.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much for tuning in! It is definitely a tough call between these two excellent offerings from Roland! If you're mainly using the instrument for piano practice, the FP60X definitely provides a bit more richness. However, if you're looking for fun and additional features, the FP-E50 is quite the powerhouse! :)

[@jonniiinferno9098]

@@MerriamPianos - Thanks for that additional input - i was already leaning toward the FP-E50 - and this helps.

[@KCPWSR]

Hi Stu, yesterday I compared the concert piano sound from the FP30x vs FPE50. Don't you find the piano sound from the PFE 50 too be more synthetic and significantly less authentic?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for writing in! Personally, I find the two piano sounds to be quite comparable. This is particularly true when playing with headphones. With that said, it is a matter of subjectivity of course. :)

[@richarpadilla1891]

I like this reviews a lot ,, i wanna buy an FPE 50 this year , the RD 88 is sold out in PR so i will like to get an FPE 50 instead !

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks! We're glad you enjoyed it. The FP-E50 is amazing and packs quite the punch for its attractive price tag. You will be thrilled with it! :)

[@KimLyons-ed5ef]

RD 88 isn't as good as fpe50 my opinion

[@MrEagleeye58]

Hi , at 6:27 your diagram shows FP-E50 compatible with Piano Designer (APP) - is that a typo? , it seems Piano Designer is Built INTO the FP-E50 keyboard. Roland Web site on Piano Designer "App" does not list FP-E50 as connectable..

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! That slide is not suggesting that the FPE50 is compatible with the app. It is stating that the Piano Designer is onboard and how many adjustable parameters it contains.

[@Fretless1]

Thank you for the review Seems to me that the FP-E50 has a lot of similarities to the RD-88 but with some upgrades I like the "Zen Core" feature and some improvements on the build and look of the instrument I hope that this has an improved PHA-4 action, however because of my own experience with the RD-88 I've owned for almost 3 years I still wish that Roland and some other companies would install 5 pin midi in and out connections on their new keyboards, Yamaha still has them on their new keyboards. I also hope that these standard, (in my opinion) connections aren't going away This is a tough comparison (FP-60 and FP-E50) but Stu did a great job of comparing the two I always appreciate Stu's piano playing and sharing his knowledge with us👏 Cheers Dave

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you for tuning in! We appreciate it. :) The FP-E50 is an impressive machine to say the least and there is definitely a bit of overlap with the RD-88. I don't believe there were any changes or updates to the PHA-4 action, but, naturally, the enclosure and design the action is featured in will have a slight affect on its overall feel. In terms of 5-PIN MIDI connectors, the trend seems to be removing them in favour of USB ports and Bluetooth MIDI. Thanks again and happy playing!

[@cinepost]

Does the new Go:Keys5 have similar features to the FP-e50?

[@MerriamPianos]

There is certainly some crossover between the two feature offerings (ZEN-Core engine, accompaniment features, etc.). With that said, the FP-E50's core piano experience is far superior of course. But, it all comes down to context of use. The portability factor of the GO:Keys 5 may be appealing for some customers.

[@utensil7granny]

Could you compare the feel and sound between the FPE50 and the FP30x? Do the keyboards feel different, is one slightly less nuanced when playing the main concert piano sound? Thank you!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! The FP-E50 and FP30X both use the exact same PHA4 action and SuperNATURAL tone engine. With that said, the core piano experience is virtually the same. :)

[@MM-ww6rg]

There is a SpeakerEQ setting in the manual, "stand and desk". What are the differences?

[@MerriamPianos]

It adjusts the speaker equalization according to how you have the piano positioned. It will make adjustments to the frequency output to optimize the sound if the piano is either being played on a stand or positioned on the surface of a table/desk. :)

[@bertpierey3655]

Looking at a digital piano, will be a Roland. (Next to my yamaha keyboard). Doubting fp60x vs fp90x as the last just looks so great too. But the e50 did interest me very much for possibilities vs price. Does anyone know if Roland will come out with more “e” addition digitsl pianos? Like a fp-e80 or e90? I think that would be perfect. (Great piano but many possibilities more if you want ). Or better look for 2 machines?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! That is an interesting prospect for sure! An FP-E series instrument with the PHA50 action would be quite compelling for quite a few players I'm sure. With that said, we have not heard any word from Roland on additional FP-E models.

[@alexgoriatchenkov]

On FP60X cold you Please tell what Piano Mode Stu is using ? Thank you for detailed comparison. P.S. And personally for me most important speakers on top and ... white color . I learning Piano playing...

[@MerriamPianos]

Generally speaking, we always showcase the default settings of the primary grand piano sound of each digital piano unless otherwise specified. :)

[@jonos138]

One question, Stu spoke of the more solid keybed of the fp60x vs the fp e50. Ive heard some people say that the e50 is a bit sluggish on the key return compared to some other keybeds. That if playing a fast tune it can be more fatiguing because of this. Would this be because the e50 has a less rigid keybed than the fp60x ? Just wondered if Stu had felt this when playing the e50? Have to say that the tone of the piano on the fp60x sounds better to my ear over my tv, than the e50. There is a more metalic sound to the notes on the e50 that im not overly keen on.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! While both of these pianos use the PHA4 action, there are other factors that can influence the touch in nuanced ways. The enclosure and design of the instrument will play a part. I wouldn't say that the FP-E50 has a sluggish key return, but it does have a slightly different feel. The best bet is to test out both options in person to see which touch you connect with most. :)

[@WoutMusic]

Hey! I have an fp60x and I notice on the piano settings there is weird ringing, almost sounding like somethings loose, on the middle A and Bb. Its only present on the piano settings and is not present on any other settings. I wondered if you have experienced the a similar issue?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! Brent from Merriam Music here! I have not experienced that issue with an FP60X before. Is it perhaps a mechanical vibration caused by a resonant frequency?

[@WoutMusic]

​@@MerriamPianos unfortunately its the speaker cover. Just traded it in and the new one has the exact same issue. Its a vibration in the left side of the speaker when playing the central A and Bb :( Going back to the store this weekend.

[@WoutMusic]

Okay so i got my third fp60x now. Its similar, a slight ringing sound through the left speaker when playing the central Bb. I contacted Roland and it seems to be a weak spot with Roland according to the technician but its repairable. So I guess that is good to know for future buyers. The one I have now i am very happy with and definately best choice for this price range!!!

[@cesar_m.p.]

Do they have the same exact same keybed? I think I read somewhere that there are several PH4 variations...

[@MerriamPianos]

They both use the same PHA4 action, but there have been a few updates with more recent iterations of the PHA4 from my understanding. So, from that perspective, they will have a slightly different feel (very subtle) given that the FP-E50 is a newer update.

[@vuthipon]

What's that beautiful song that you played at the ending?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! I would have to check with Stu as to what piece he is playing at that point. In any case, thank you for tuning in! :)

[@hernancortez7030]

How does the RD 88 compare to these two pianos in sound quality? Will you be a comparison between the RD 88 and the FP E50?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! We have received a few requests for an FP-E50 and RD88 comparison. It is definitely a possibility, but there are a few other videos in the queue to tackle before that one. I would say that the FPE50 has a more full piano sound, which is also in large part due to the speaker system. With that said, there is certainly some crossover between these two amazing portable pianos. :)

[@essenceofjoy1837]

Good evening Mister. I was thinking to buy fp30x.Is it will be same piano experience playing on fp30x and fp 50e? The tone of main piano are exactly same sir? Has fp50 equipped with bms chip and same piano sample as fp30x? Mike.Thank You for responding.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! The FP30X and FP-E50 offer the same core piano experience via the SuperNATURAL tone engine and PHA4 action. Also, the FP-E50 is equipped with the newer BMC chip. :)

[@essenceofjoy1837]

Please last thing before I make my purchase decision .Can I switch of speakers on fp e50?? Cos it is really matters to me.

[@davecavanaugh3300]

Very helpful. I’m looking for a digital piano just to learn to play. The action and acoustic piano sound is what I’m interested in. I would love to purchase the Roland FP90X, but a bit to pricey, so I think the FP60X is the one…unless you suggest the Kawai.

[@MerriamPianos]

We're glad to hear that you found the comparison helpful! The FP60X is an excellent piano with a fantastic, authentic touch. With that said, the Kawai ES520 is an excellent option to explore as well. The action is not quite as heavy as the FP60X, but it is still very rewarding and may be preferred depending on your particular preferences. The best bet is to test out the various options at a showroom if possible. :)

[@davecavanaugh3300]

@@MerriamPianos Thoughts on the Kawai ES920 vs. the FP60X?

[@musicaldracula2017]

@@davecavanaugh3300 They are similar, as mentioned above, you should try them in person, if you cannot, try to listen to their main piano sounds via internet. Action wise, they are quite similar. Both of them will be enjoyable for you in the end, so do not worry about their actions, just pick up the one which sounds better for you. As a general rule, Kawai digital piano sound tends to lean towards classical music and more natural tone. Cheers and good luck!

[@sonicairmusic]

@@davecavanaugh3300Roland every time! So much nicer kit

[@yingzhu4383]

Do you think they will ever release the FP-E50 in white? Thanks for the content

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! We have not received any word from Roland regarding a release of the FP-E50 in white, but it might be a possibility.

[@hyperseah]

What is the title of that last demo piece? So soothing that for a minute I forgot I was watching a product review. 😊

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! I would have to ask Stu as to what piece he is playing at that point, but I do agree that it is easy to get lost in the music. :)

[@robintyson591]

In the wee small hours of the morning - David Mann

[@hyperseah]

@@robintyson591 Oh, 1st sung by Frank Sinatra in 1955. Thanks!

[@museeq3356]

I have outgrown my Yamaha P-125. Would the fp-e50 be a step up from my Yamaha?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! I would personally say that the FP-E50's PHA4 in particular will be a meaningful step up from the P125's action.

[@jorjajorjan3863]

I am thinking to buy FPE50 in order to have a decent portable stage piano and to experiment with all the other cool sounds and functions.Does it have a good and durable built? What do you think about it as a decent portable piano?

[@MerriamPianos]

Yup! Absolutely! It is a powerhouse piano in terms of features and functionality and is designed to be gigged with, so it is quite durable. :)

[@jorjajorjan3863]

@@MerriamPianos Thanks for your help . The only thing that concerns me has to do with the fact that I owned a roland fantom 2003 model back in 2010 and I didn't liked the sounds they felt too old and I sold it. Do you think that I will like the sounds in FPe50 more?

[@tjmpiano]

Does anyone know if the fp E50 can accept the 3 pedal unit for gig playing I know it has a stand with 3 pedals but no one can answer it at the local music stores... Thanks

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi Tom! Unfortunately, Roland has not officially advertised whether the floating RPU3 system is compatible with the FPE50. I believe it would be, but I have not personally tried it myself. Perhaps, one of our helpful community members here can confirm!

[@tjmpiano]

@@MerriamPianos Thank you for your quick reply.. It is not a deal breaker but sure would be nice..

[@Zoco101]

Thanks for another excellent review. I'm much more a pianist than keyboardist, so I favour the FP-60X. As I've said many times, Yamaha should be making its own "P" piano with a spec closer to the FP-60X. The FP-e50 has more onboard controls (always nice IMO) and the greater flexibility in recording and making backing tracks is attractive even to me - at least for home practice purposes. Stu briefly mentioned the graded actions, but it would be nice to know (on all digital pianos) how finely progressive the grading is. Is it just 3 zones in the case of the PHA4? Regarding microphones, the importance of these is often overlooked, and I'm guessing that for straight-forward singing, both of these models offer the same capability. Even pianists who never sing, may need to supply a mic for somebody who does, and they themselves might need to make announcements at gigs. Not using a separate mixer can save vital time if you're under pressure to set up quickly, say in venues which only open minutes before the public enters. A switch for effects cancel would be good for swapping between speech and song. I suspect that a separate mixer (for a mic) would still be required in many situations, particularly if the hi/mid/low is hard to adjust separately from the piano patch being played.

[@Instrumental-Covers]

Hi Mike. Regarding progressive actions: I think the Kawai MP11SE has 5 or 6 zones (at least that's what I have read in online piano forums). However, the only digital piano manufacturer that I have seen specifically talking about linear grading is Yamaha, and that's on the CLP-775 and CLP-785. They even have a separate section addressing it, and this is what they say: 88-key Linear Graded Hammers-the first digital piano keyboard ever to feature realistic weighting on every key Every single key on a grand piano keyboard is weighted differently. This is because the strings for each note are slightly thinner and shorter in the treble register, becoming thicker and longer towards the bass register. The 88-key Linear Graded Hammers of the Clavinova is the first-of-its-kind to faithfully duplicate this graded touch with differing weights and key return on each one of its keys. This results in a feel and response that is astonishingly like that of a grand piano, and allows players to gain an appreciation of a more authentic touch. I am not sure how important that is, but they seem to care about that detail. Going back to the gigging piano experience: what is your opinion of the new Yamaha CK88? It is 14 lbs (6 Kg) lighter than the FP60X, it is battery operated, it has piano presets designed for gigs, onboard equalizer, microphone input (via A/D input jack), screen, and built-in speakers. I know you prefer the GH3 action over the GHS action because you can play faster... not sure if that would be a deal-breaker for you. What is your opinion on the speed of the PHA-4 action? I find it to be kind of sluggish. I played the Casio PX-S5000 yesterday directly against the Yamaha P515, and I noticed the PX-S5000 keys bounce twice after being released while the NWX action on the P515 does not bounce at all... I guess that hesitation would slow down the action? Not sure. I would like to hear your opinion. One more question: how important are the built-in speakers for you? I used to play in a church with a pair of 15" as main speakers for the audience, but I used a pair of 10" stage monitors for me. The digital pianos and/or arrangers did not have enough power from their built-in speakers for a live situation like that. Not hearing yourself clearly is pretty bad. The 15" speakers volume, coupled with the fact there were no walls around me (so the sound escaped from the built-in speakers escaped in all directions), forced me to use dedicated powerful stage monitors, so I could hear myself playing.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you for taking the time to tune in and write in with your thoughts Mike! I think you bring up a good point regarding graded actions. Perhaps, this is a topic that merits an entire video review? ;) Also, you make some very excellent points about microphones. The convenience of being able to plug a microphone into your portable digital piano will be an invaluable feature for those that are performing and looking to streamline the gear they have to bring to and from a gig. I was actually quite impressed with the FP series instruments' microphone capabilities. The fidelity and customization is quite impressive and would be more than suitable for most small venues. :)

[@Zoco101]

​​@@Instrumental-Covers good to hear from you. I haven't tried the new Yamaha CK pianos, though I've seen a couple of reviews and have checked the specs with my main supplier. They look like a great idea for some players, particularly those who want a cross between a stage piano and an arranger keyboard. It's interesting that the smaller one has 61 keys and not 73. That's cool. As you probably know, I often campaign for more choice in lengths of digital pianos. I was sad that the 61 key model didn't get a weighted action, not even GHS, but maybe there aren't enough players who need that on a 61 key instrument of this type. As for GHS on the CK-88, you know I would think several times before buying an instrument with GHS, but its implementation on the P-125 seems improved over the version on the P-45. I tested them side by side. So, GHS may be getting better every time. I half regret not buying a P-121 as a travel piano. I'm playing more vintage jazz repertoire now, and getting progressively further from needing complex keyboards, so I don't think the CK range is for me. Nowadays, I mainly need a good action and a piano tone I can use and tweak quickly on stage. I'm still finding the P-255 very useful, so until I find something much better... For me, built in speakers are useful, but in some stage situations they are more a hindance than a help. I like having them while practising, particularly in combination with studio monitors, partly because they make the keys vibrate a little, which also happens on an acoustic piano. They also saved me at one particular intimate gig when I forgot the main speakers. The CK pianos have some modest speakers, which is in keeping with the arranger aspect. They would drowned out in a band setting (even as monitors) but might be good for practising and arranging and for ad hoc situations. Optional power by batteries is a nice extra, and more speaker amplification would deplete those batteries too quickly I imagine.

[@Instrumental-Covers]

@@Zoco101 I think there is a point after which the improvements are only marginal at best when it comes to a good piano sound and action in a portable instrument. I found yesterday an old Yamaha Clavinova CLP-115 for only $600, which was released in 2003... it sounded way better than most 2023 digital pianos that I play from other brands, even though it is 20 years old. I would be more interested in putting my money towards a quality PA speaker system or a keyboard amplifier (like a Roland KC series) than upgrading the piano in your case.

[@Zoco101]

@@Instrumental-Covers I think you're probably right, but I didn't realise that you would recommend the Roland KC series.

[@BUJU2007]

Have you guys been looking into the Yamaha CK88?

[@Instrumental-Covers]

It seems to be a great alternative to the CP and YC series. Half the price, you do get the S700 sample (which is only available in the MODX+, Montage, CP and YC models... of course, in the original S90SE), organ and synth section, onboard equalizer, it has built-in speakers, and only 28 lbs. It is a great gigging instrument. I think it will naturally compete with the Roland RD88.

[@MerriamPianos]

We have not tackled that model yet in a review/comparison video, but we will certainly do our best to in the near future. Thank you for the suggestion! :)

[@realstreetuk]

Hi Does anyone who has this keyboard know if you can save your chord detection settings and when restart the keyboard they are there ready to use? Every time I power up.to play I have to go and alter chord detection again for my liking

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! Thanks for the question! I am not entirely sure to be honest as I have not tried saving that particular parameter. I am not at a showroom currently to test that out, but, perhaps, one of our helpful community members/FP-E50 users can jump in and assist in this case. :)

[@realstreetuk]

Ok thanks

[@jorjajorjan3863]

FPe50 is an interesting and flexible instrument.

[@MerriamPianos]

Absolutely! It is a very impressive instrument for the price point. :)

[@tgstanleyfineart]

As a new adult piano student - I've been watching videos endlessly for a couple of weeks trying to decide which digital piano/keyboard fits my needs best. I took the plunge on the FP-E50 which arrives within a week. Your videos have been extremely helpful and the most informative (for the details that swayed my decision) of the reviewers of digital pianos. Although every pianist sounds biased toward brands - I felt like your reviews are mostly unbiased. I wanted something I could move from room to room by myself and that I would not outgrow in the next 10 years as I learn. With the weight restrictions, I feel like this keyboard is enough piano not to hinder my learning and enough stage to keep it fun when I get stuck on something for a few days. I'm trying to decide whether to buy the matching stand but looks don't matter, and I really prefer something more portable. Thanks for all the info. The side by side comparisons were great for understanding.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! We're happy to hear that our video reviews and comparisons were helpful through your decision process. Congrats on your FP-E50! It is a wonderful, fully-loaded digital piano that I know you will thoroughly enjoy for many years to come. :)

[@henrythaler4419]

Can a pedal on the FP-E50 be configured for the rotating speaker Leslie speeds?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! I don't believe the pedals are assignable, but there are two assignable wheels that can be used to control certain effects such as the rotating speaker rate if I recall correctly.

[@msgn8i11s2]

Can the bluetooth issue on the E50 be fixed in an update?

[@MerriamPianos]

It is not an issue. Roland has decided not to include Roland app connectivity with the model. With that said, it may be something they change down the road.

[@msgn8i11s2]

​@@MerriamPianos well I used the word issue , since english is not my native language and I think it is an issue when it comes to decied to buy or not. I would like a 88 key fully weighted piano to really learn to play properly thru an app like flowkey, simply piano, yousician, piano marvel or similar. I would also like a piano that could work as a midi keyboard/controller at the same time. After tens of demo/review videos I have found my dream piano! The Nord stage 4. The work flow and ease to change sounds etc is just everything I would love on a piano and it seems to sound fantastic. That said, I cant find one single argument to buy the Stage 4 as a beginners piano... So would you say an E50 would work, or is there any other better piano option to learn to play that also work much more like the Stage 4?

[@pabelhernandez6186]

@@msgn8i11s2 bro, NS4 is one of tops. you cant's compare it with fp e50 because ns4 costs like x8 more than e50.

[@joenoeb]

Hey@@msgn8i11s2, I tried Flowkey and Marvel and they both work on the FP-E50 over BT MIDI just fine. It's just Roland's (own) Piano App that doesn't support the FP-E50.

[@raykeys7001]

Stu. I know you explained that the action does not feel the same as the 60, but compared to a Yamaha P115, the PHA4 on the E50 still would be a step up for practice/ playing in your opinion?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! The enclosure and design that the action is fitted into does have an impact on the overall feel of the touch, hence the subtle differences between the FP-E50 and FP-60X. In terms of whether the PHA4 of the FP-E50 would be a step up from the Yamaha P115, it would come down to a matter of opinion of course. In my opinion though, I think the PHA4 offers a more authentic touch. :)

[@raykeys7001]

@@MerriamPianos Thank you so much Brent. Much appreciated..

[@midinotes]

I don't think the Roland FP-E50 can record midi internally, only audio. Obviously you could so over USB midi with a computer but I believe the internal recorder is audio only.

[@MerriamPianos]

You are correct! There are some small limitations with the FP-E50, but, with that said, it is hard to be too disappointed by that when you look at the incredible features packed into it! :)

[@shura1972mar]

I would like to have FP-E60x without a compromise 😂

[@MerriamPianos]

Haha that is a very cool idea! FP-E50 with higher-powered, top-facing speakers; I think that is a great idea! :)

[@bernardodiaz9428]

is there any cheaper piano than the fp e50 that´s got all these sounds?

[@MerriamPianos]

The Casio CDPS360 is a cheaper solution and it has 700 built-in sounds. However, I would personally say that the quality of the FP-E50's sounds are far superior.

[@bernardodiaz9428]

@@MerriamPianos great advice! Because I don´t have a piano in my house, I´ve been learning at my grandma´s for the past 4 months with her acoustic piano that´s got more or less 100 years and it´s been a magnificent experience. Now, my birthday´s coming, so for my first piano, I think I´ll go for the roland fp 10

[@macha18]

​@@bernardodiaz9428 me too!

[@lumpichu]

Korg XE20 (SP)

[@antoniolamagna1568]

So, what is the best????

[@MerriamPianos]

That is decision every piano player will have to make for themselves! The FPE50 is probably going to be the preference for performance and studio situations, while the FP60X would be the ideal choice for at-home piano practice. :)

[@Yakumo00o]

how does it compare to the FP-30X, especially concerning speakers, action and build quality? I thought about getting the FP30X, mainly for practising, but the FP-e50 is just a bit more expensive in my region (much cheaper than 60X) and all the bonus features sound great for the price.

[@MerriamPianos]

The FP-E50 has the same PHA4 action and SuperNATURAL piano sound as the FP30X. I would say the speaker experience is similar too. With that said, the FP-E50 is far more loaded with features and the inclusion of the ZEN-Core engine as well makes it really special!

[@pabelhernandez6186]

​@@ytinf1090not only.sounds but features, prices may change in regions, but i think if e50 is about 150 more expensive, it is ok. But if its 200, I thinks is better waiting a bit, because black friday is near, and maybe this months incoming, other brands like kawai could launch a competitive new model.

[@slivkask8329]

Unfortunately, FP-E50 is not compatible with Roland Piano App, FP-30X is, if that is important to you.

[@drice304]

Compatibility with piano app was just fixed in a firmware upgrade

[@AlbertoSegovia.]

Roland is getting there, with the F701 and the FPE50 is filling a needy niche. But the 50’s sound sounds too fake to me for some reason…

[@MerriamPianos]

The F701 and FPE501 are both excellent pianos and definitely filling in important price gaps in the market. :)

[@AlbertoSegovia.]

@@MerriamPianos and I only speak about the 50’s sound because at least for me, the fact that the cabinetry resonates along with the speakers in the F701 is a more “solid” experience when compared with a keyboard. For some reason that’s something I like about the F.

[@Biozene]

So there IS a touch of sample stepping going on on the 60X (and therefore the 30X too, which I'm seriously considering). Disappointing.

[@MerriamPianos]

To some extent, it is inevitable to happen to some magnitude with a sample-based engine. However, it is not particularly pronounced in the FP30X and FP60X in my opinion. It is only the most discerning and sensitive players that are likely to notice and, even then, I don't think it would be particularly annoying or disruptive to them. Of course, it is a matter of opinion though.

[@Fretless1]

Please explain (sample stepping) ...Thanks

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@Fretless1 The basic MIDI standard is 0 to 127 increments for velocity. Some of these instruments may step up by 10's so instead of 128 velocity levels you have only 12.

[@Biozene]

@@Fretless1 It means there's a bit of an unnatural jump from one volume level to the next when you hit the key with different amounts of force. It can be quite subtle, but it still irks me a little lol.

[@Biozene]

@@MerriamPianos Fair enough. Thanks for your response!

[@richardpeterson2357]

Really then why is there a problem with the midi on the roland fp e50 when midi has been a standard for ever and why do you need an upgrade to get the roland app to work you know the app the really does not do any thing. At a cost of over $1,000.00 it seems to me that the roland fp e 50 is well over priced. You can get a keyboard for $75 dollars that has a working midi port. Now tell me again why roland is so great

[@MerriamPianos]

The calibre of the PHA4 action, the combination of the SuperNATURAL and ZEN-Core engines, as well as the incredibly sophisticated accompaniment/arranger functionality make the FP-E50 one of the best value propositions on the market right now in my personal opinion. Also, I think there is some confusion here. The FP-E50's USB port transmits MIDI. It can also transmit MIDI wireless via Bluetooth. It is simply not compatible with Roland's Piano App. You can still use it as a MIDI controller for DAWs for instance.

[@JoeLinux2000]

When I heard the E50 in the show room, I didn't like the sound of the acoustic piano voice at all.

[@MerriamPianos]

The piano sound it uses is the same core SuperNATURAL Piano sound heard on the FP30X and FP60X. Of course, the differences with the speakers and some other details will change things slightly though. With that said, every player will have their own preferences when it comes to tone.

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@MerriamPianos It was weird. I instantly rejected the sound. I had no interest in playing the instrument. I think my ear has been spoiled by Pianoteq.

[@mfurman]

@@JoeLinux2000 You are right that using Pianoteq (and some other VSTs) makes us aware how unimpressive Roland acoustic piano sounds are. I do not agree with Merriam Music that it is all dependent on personal preferences - there are some sound references, as far as piano sound is concerned.

[@eddie1brazil]

That’s so right. I wonder how long its going to take for these companies to join forces with vst/modeling pioneers out there, another 50 years maybe lol

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@mfurman I think it boils down to economics and product placement within the company's own line and the competition. Roland's LX-708 is a great sounding piano, and Stu praises the GP6. Roland is not going to produce an under $1000.00 piano that is as good as their LX-708. Yamaha is not going to produce a DGX that is genuinely comparable to their Flagship Montage. I imagine when the Roland GP 9 comes out it will have the LX-708 action. When I go into the showroom they are wanting to sell me something that very day without much of a real try. I bought the DGX sight unseen. The fact that the strings don't sustain with the pdeal was a big disappointment. IC says they do, but so far I haven't figured it out. I would be interested to know if the E50's strings sustain with the pedal. Stu's demos are good, because he's a great player and trustworthy in his commentary. Unfortunately there are certain things he should be testing but never does such as latency and connectivity with a secondary VST and exactly how the sustain pedal works in conjunction with the voices. I don't think any of the instruments he has demonstrated has after touch, but maybe the RD2000 does. If it does, he never demonstrated it. Perhaps he should do a series on MIDI controllers. Creating Unbelievable Sounds & Patches on the Yamaha Montage 7 ft. Mike Patrick kzbin.info/www/bejne/pmKnlZugjLifadE You aren't going to get this out of a DGX.

[@user-yl2nk9sp2y]

Deutsch

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you for tuning in! :)

[@TamirOrkobysPiano]

Fp30x,60x got Upright sample. Fpe50 dont.

[@MerriamPianos]

There are a few patches like "Rock Piano" and "Ragtime Piano" that sound like they are modelled after uprights. However, they are stylized sounds opposed to a standard "upright acoustic" tone.

[@richardpeterson2357]

I'm in southeast Asia so I'm out of luck when it comes to Roland they sell there products here but there is no free support if you want to pay for support you will get some one who does not know the roland products at all so as fare as I am concerned Roland is amoung the worst companies in the muscial instrument industry

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! I'm sorry to hear that Roland doesn't offer support in your area. With that said, Roland digital pianos have some of the lowest warranty claim rates in the industry. They are very robust and durable instruments.

[@richardpeterson2357]

Do all digital piano companies charge for support or is it just Roland. This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard of. I was all set to buy the FPE 50 until I found out there is no way to get any questions answered unless you pay for the answers. Not a good selling point. I think money is better spent on Yamaha or Casio

[@MerriamPianos]

I have never heard of this "paid support" model to be honest. In my experiences, it is the complete opposite situation. Roland Canada is incredibly helpful and always great about answering questions and offering support to customers.

[@mfurman]

Are you in North America? I always got great and very prompt response from Roland. Casio support in Canada is not existent and Yamaha’s support is much worse than Roland’s. I had seven Roland digital pianos and four Yamaha pianos. I did not like Casio but tried to get some support without any results. With all my experience, I can safely say that I prefer Roland piano actions. Again, where do you live? Michael

[@richardpeterson2357]

@@mfurman No Im in Thailand and there is very little support for roland here. I was hoping to get a Roland FPE 50 but I only found one company that has one but I dont trust what they say and they are about 300 miles away. I have found a lot of companies that claim to be Roland authorized dealers but are are unable to order one for me. So I find it very difficault to try and deal with Roland. So now the search is on for something equal to the FPE 50 do you have any Ideas?

[@mfurman]

@@richardpeterson2357 I would try Yamaha CK88. Remember that Merriam Music is in Canada (Ontario to be precise) and they will only comment on North American market. Good luck!

[@richardpeterson2357]

@@mfurman Thanks Michael Yamaha is a big seller here in Thailand

[@pianomikeoct]

the fp e50 piano sound did not sound that good the Fp 60x sounded fuller.

[@MerriamPianos]

The FP60X does have a superior speaker system and has a richer piano tone as a result. However, the FPE50's feature offering is quite impressive!