Roles of Judge and Jury

[@nihilkatedra5452]

Johnny Depp brought me here

[@ventura5920]

I do accounting, this was very helpful in clarifying my law module.

[@legalyou8412]

Glad to be of help.

[@touqeerahmed4032]

So technically you let janitors, accountants and sales ladies, having never read a word of law decide if the culprit is guilty or not?

[@julietcrowson3503]

Yes but jurers at proper courts are vetted first. Problems happen in the pretence of impartiality: so for example, healthcare professionals are put on trial at quasi-courts in England, so the rules of cout are not complied with because the regulator isn't regulated, the judge and jury are paid their wages by the prosecution, who in turn are just a profitmaket, when they should be an instrument of truth telling. Corrie everywhere quite Corrie... Jurisprudence publications show how witnesses can lie

[@NickYack]

We also let these people decide the governors, senators, and president. The principle of democracy in the US is faith in American citizens, and that same principle is applied to jury duty. Today it would seem foolish to expect the average man to have the wisdom necessary to do either of these things. But at the time of Americas founding, the people who made the country were much different. At the time of Americas founding, most of her citizens were yeomen farmers. The founders believed that from their labors on the farm, yeoman farmers learned virtues that were necessary for them to be active participants in their own governance. Namely these virtues were independence, meritocracy, and reverence for the land. Independence because they had to rely on themselves to work their land. Meritocracy because their labor earned them their keep. Reverence for land because it was a life giving organism. These same values are necessary for any functioning state. If the citizens valued these ideas, then the state would as well.

[@mcgulchmcgulch5069]

Yes, fellow citizens, not king, or dictator or elites or someone with a certain level of wealth.

[@AJthe13th]

@@mcgulchmcgulch5069 One of the most powerful and convincing messages I've seen in a while. Not a ruler, not some noble or higher class. One of us. The right to be tried by people who are like us, people who know where we're coming from and people who get us. That's true equality and true fairness. No longer are the days of the elites lording over us. But all of us are equal. The president has the same amount of power as the farmer on a jury. All men are created equal.

[@touqeerahmed4032]

@McGulch McGulch how about knowledge, education, credentials? Someone who is trained to be objective in their decisions. Ever wonder why having a pretty Pu$$y is enough to get your whole case thrown out irrespective of the evidence? Casey Murrey Anthony. On average beautiful people are judged and convicted far less than the "not so pretty" ones. While somebody considered Immoral, I.e. a Prostitute, isn't even given a fair trial. Aileen Wuornos.

[@darrylbrown9469]

The judge is a referee, the jury is the judge.

[@julietcrowson3503]

The judge is the judge if he is flirting with the prosecutor or paid by the prosecutor. Follow the money - ie- the source of their wages...

[@darrylbrown9469]

@@julietcrowson3503 they are paid by the IMF, follow it freemasons/illuminati.

[@julietcrowson3503]

@@darrylbrown9469 what's IMF? international monetary fund? I've heard of the FreeM and Illuminati but don't know anything about them...in England, Christians have BIG problems because of truth telling exposing liars, I mean lawyers...oops!

[@ProdigyMan88]

The only more confusing thing in America is healthcare insurance.

[@julietcrowson3503]

Healthcare regulation by law corps is even more illogical ...but only the woke know the Corrie...

[@bahiya94]

student loans 😆

[@j0ellyfish]

I love how you're forced to be in jury, make the final decision, as the judge just sits there and makes 5 times more than you for smacking a hammer. Wake up, people.

[@chrislyons6951]

There are a zillion excuses to be ineligible for jury duty

[@printtoast]

We don't have a jury system and in my country judges are only in the high court and magistrates in the lower courts both need to have studied law and received a degree

[@julietcrowson3503]

Lucky you Which country dyou live in? I'll move there!!

[@mcgulchmcgulch5069]

We don’t have formal classes or castes in the U.S. The jury is a safeguard against elites/nobles/royalty simply making disputes, and essentially our society unequal. Our jury system developed from English juries only ours was infused with democratic ideals from the 18th century.

[@rami30]

Been watching Suits show and came here now what’s all jury duty about.

[@txcakr0622]

Is it just me or is everyone else confused🐷🐷

[@biancab5488]

ok so i got my head around it i think. so i think of it this way. i just need to find a way to put it in a exam form because when they want the meanings and explaination they want like formal ways but thats what gets me confused when its in a formal way. anyway. so the JURY's role/job is to: is to gather and get all the facts and apply thoses facts to the law (the goverment rules). Once they have applied the facts/ information about the case and see if they follow the law they then choose/ decide if the person is guilty or not. if they have commited the crime or issue or not. THe JUDGE is basically the big boss. thats how i think of it. the judge is just the final decision maker. They just aprove if the jury's information/ thinking is right or not. the judge is basically the principle. final decision maker of the whole thing. i realted it to like school kinda or like the govermennt. its like when we have state goverments they cant make a whole decision without the federal goverment saying yes. its like school when the lower teachers want to do somthing new or idk add something they cant do it without the principals agrrement right? the principals final decision. but the judge (the big boss) has to help guide the jury's when they are looking for the facts/ information and has to help guide them when applying to the law. basically jury's the students and the judge is the teavher helping them and making the final decision. idk if im right. but i think so. hope this helped? can someone please review if my thinking is right because i have a year 10 exam on this in 1 week. btw im not smart kid im just passing kid so im actually really shocked how well i explained this and i actually understood somthing.

[@vxctor4045]

@@biancab5488 umm I’m not gonna read that all

[@biancab5488]

@@vxctor4045 aww ok. well it will help understand it if u do. i kinda put it in simple words. sorry

[@kimmy1273]

@@biancab5488 I'm doing an essay on trial by jury can you message me?

[@emilylg7666]

@@biancab5488 thank you so much i read the whole thing

[@tajaicalip3825]

If the judge at the Renee C. Davidson Court was not trying to intimidate, control me, and prevent me from speaking. Why does the judge not know how much evidence I have and that the other side do not have any evidence? If the judge was not being abusive in their power. How come the judge does not know that the opposing side had already acknowledged the water damage and reduced my bill until the problem was to be fixed? The judge does not know this because judge smith is an abusive, unlawful, judge who should be prosecuted for her unlawful actions. She purposely tried to get me to pay some thugs in oakland too after another Judge, Judge Clay, and I made an agreement with the Attorney where I told the opposing side I needed money to be relocated because they were a Church that I used to attend and I thought they helped people when someone breaks into their home. What kind of judge would order a Mom who had just lost her Mother to pay thugs after I had already been won my case and judge smith left the trespassers in my home too. judge smith has priors of tampering with my cases and not listening. She is very incompetent and petty. Why is she not being charged for her intentionally foul role which is not under any judge procedures and policies. She was acting on her own accord not the established laws. Are these people even judges or messy people causing violence in oakland like they normally do? Their actions do not say that they are of any laws. Only foul corruption and they should be treated with the harshest treatment.

[@zekkvot4712]

What a fucking stupid random rant... Did you actually think that you bitching about your life in here is gonna change anything? Did you actually think anyone in here give s a shit about your sob story? Every word that comes out of your mouth is so fucking stupid. Given your stupidity, it's no wonder the judge didn't allow you to speak. Uneducated fucks like you should not have the right to speak in court. Stick to your minimum wage job at McDonalds. Please don't reproduce, do the world a solid favour.

[@TheAwoudors]

Who is here after the Johny-Amber verdict? 🤭

[@thegreatheisenburger5656]

Is anyone else studying or studied this in school

[@thegreatheisenburger5656]

I am

[@cloudysunset7146]

I am

[@oliviajade3655]

Writing a 1500 word essay on this right now so this is coming in handy 😂

[@tannu4377]

Can judge ask questiongs?

[@legalyou8412]

In Florida, judges can ask questions during a trial, but they must be careful not to help one side by introducing evidence critical to that side’s case.

[@tannu4377]

Wow, you answered really quickly, and looking when you uploaded your last video, it seemed like you gave up on this channel. I really didn't expect to get answer this fast.

[@legalyou8412]

We do have more in production, stay tuned.

[@tannu4377]

What if they help the other side?

[@legalyou8412]

@@tannu4377 We can't answer for every jurisdiction, but in Florida, at least, you can ask the judge to be disqualified.

[@st.paulmn9159]

God is my only judge

[@julietcrowson3503]

God is our Witness too 🙏

[@GODOFEARTHREALM]

Maybe judge's used to be impartial, unbiased and defend the constitution and law. Not now, we have openly activist judges and sometimes morally absent judges. So can't really agree there.

[@veneno276]

In personal situations, judges are punishers to landlords and allow lazy people to live for free for months in landlord expenses. How that is fair?

[@almay9962]

doesn't the jury get to judge the law itself, jury nullification. What would happen if a juror did this

[@legalyou8412]

Jurors cannot be punished for "jury nullification" but it is not an orthodox legal doctrine. Such jurors are not making or changing law, just refusing to apply it in a certain case.

[@almay9962]

@@legalyou8412 thank you

[@julietcrowson3503]

Nope. You're lucky if the judge, jury etc are willing to consider reading the evidence, let alone spend time reading a case summary...in England, that is...imo

[@julietcrowson3503]

@@legalyou8412 absolutely - making the decision unchallengeable....

[@unclesam8380]

After deep heard trial

[@claramelodychiota8216]

😊Yitzhak ❤😊10_10

[@smokywolf9653]

Thank you so much

[@yugpatel8308]

Is that you Ahkil I’m Yug

[@yugpatel8308]

You’re the best Yug

[@calebtorres9714]

Well the only thing I know about judges is that most of them are very OLD

[@julietcrowson3503]

And out of date in their knowledge, and discriminatory...in England imo

[@julietcrowson3503]

What does q: c stand for? quite Corrie imo...

[@koscocosco5309]

How can lay people decide

[@QSL.]

Wow!

[@brittanybunbury558]

Make more videos

[@syediftikharali8771]

Okay so the Narrator says "She" but the Subtitles say "He"

[@legalyou8412]

Yet another reason why gender specific pronouns are problematic. Thanks for the heads up. We'll try to get on fixing that.

[@syediftikharali8771]

@@legalyou8412 oh wow, you replied! Cool. Tho, I wouldn't quite agree with the gender specific pronouns being "problematic" statement you presented.

[@jason401.]

@@syediftikharali8771 ikr

[@oldenoughtobeyourmot]

@@legalyou8412 No offence but I do not believe they are not problematic. They has been in use since the 14th century, and is the go to non gender specific pronoun for anyone not policing what she thinks.

[@printtoast]

Is the jury normal citizens

[@julietcrowson3503]

The panellists at healthcare regulators in England aren't normal mentally, but it depends on your Interpretation of whether narcs are normal and whether narcs are good at judging empaths...narcs do look normal though....

[@julietcrowson3503]

Only if they're a jury - if they work at healthcare regulators, they're nvb but want lunch

[@julietcrowson3503]

The prosecution lawyers lie

[@yugpatel8308]

Txt acro

[@zes3813]

no such thing as rolex etc, do any nmw