Rolex Deepsea Comparison 116660, 126660, and 136660

Purchase these watches at DavidSW:
davidsw.com/Visit our Website - davidsw.com/
Here is a comparison video of the Rolex Sea-Dweller Deepsea
Reference 116660, 126660, 136660
Reference 116660
Released 2008
Diameter: 44mm
Movement: Calibre 3135 (COSC Certified)
Function: Time and date
Water Resistant: 3900 Meters
Reference 126660
Released 2018
Diameter: 44mm
Movement: Calibre 3235 (COSC Certified)
Function: Time and date
Water Resistant: 3900 Meters
Reference 136660
Released 2022
Diameter: 44mm
Movement: Calibre 3235 (COSC Certified)
Function: Time and date
Water Resistant: 3900 Meters
Sell your watch - davidsw.com/sell-your-watch/
Follow us on Instagram - / dsworlando
Add us on Facebook - / davidsworlando
Testimonials & Reviews - www.trustpilot.com/review/dav...
#Davidsw #Rolex #Deepsea

[@gabyeah101]

The 116660 is 21mm lug width,126660 and 136660 are 22m lug width

[@maxanderson5612]

I have the 136660 black dial, It is flawless i absolutely love it, Suit's all occasions, Endless compliments. If you're looking to obtain in the Sea Dweller Range, Deep Sea Dweller is the go. Trust me get one on your wrist. 😊

[@carlosg9905]

Had the JC 116660 2017 model and💙it. However I rather much prefer the wider 22mm bracelet on the 126660 which I currently own 2022 model. Sold the 116660 JC and never looked back. Thought I wanted the new 136660 JC but made no sense why Rolex removed the diver’s extension yet raised the price. For me the best example is the JC 126660. To each their own!!

[@johnice2157]

The black 116600 (the Bismarck) will be fore sure a collector.

[@georgiebestmanutd4746]

Thanks 4 highlighting subtle changes; comparing & contrasting between several generations of Rolex Deep Sea

[@Mercuricmike]

Thanks foe the video & comparison!

[@Leftystrat]

Tried on the 136600. 7.6 inch wrist fits like a dream. Bit loud for me and would go the 116600 all black because if the proven movement and less ostentatious. The newer movement will have to prove its worthiness

[@drbones3rd]

I absolutely love my JC 126660 and wear it 24/7. My only small complaint, it is hard to read the date without reading glasses. Wonder if the 136660 is any easier since it is a little larger?

[@matwhet7754]

116660 Mk 1 was the best. Tapered bracelet balanced the case and was elegant. 22mm lugs made the case look more square and chunky. Domed crystal > 136660 crystal. Fliplock included even if removed and put in box (what i did). Coronet on Mk 1 dial unique to DSSD. Speculation but I've had both in hand - even later 116660 were chunkier than M serial.

[@Laguna2013]

what's the market for these vs the sub?

[@mrdan26261]

116660 i think was a better movement check the expert the movement was very delicate 126660 136660

[@dimisconti2729]

116660 --> 21 mm Endlinks!!! 126660 and 136660 --> both 22 mm Endlinks.

[@chevykid2004]

I just got my 136660 and thought it was a fake until i saw this video. all the other sea dwellers have the extra folding bit on the end of the band and this model doesn't. Thanks for the clarification DavidSW

[@FMB2X]

I have the 126660 no complaints never going to sell it!

[@joeclifford4953]

Excellent reviews

[@grouchoharpo1091]

大変参考になりました。発売から15年で定価が37％上昇していますが、パフォーマンスはそこまでの改善点はないですね。同価格帯では「オイパペ・デイトジャスト・フルーテッドベゼル・金コンビ」や「コスモグラフ・デイトナ」がありますが、リセール価格を考えるとディープシーは本当に好きな方に選ばれる時計ですね！

[@vladv2777]

I am in line for one

[@falcon81701]

The versatility of the bracelet design is awesome. Wish the Sub included this! My favorite is the Deep Blue design

[@fastfordrs8957]

I can get a 2016 116660 for 11k full set should I buy it though

[@toodamnskippy6220]

Yes!

[@ericngch]

136660 for me was most comfortable out of the 3 deepsea.

[@lq615]

Just got mine and after adjusting it exactly feel so comfortable

[@Truelife5354]

I have the 126660. Why is the 136660 more convenient? It's almost the same clock. Only the bezel and date have been changed, and the diving extension is gone.

[@paulhammal7231]

@@Truelife5354 Because human nature dictates that whatever you happen to own is best… I’m going to get into a JC soon. It’ll either be a 126660 or a 136660, nothing between them ergonomically👍

[@user-on7ij1cq9d]

I’m wearing mine today

[@theerrantwanderer]

The only legit use for such a high crush depth is for the watch to be strapped to a deep diving submersible's rc arm, like the one that was strapped to James Cameron's Deepsea Challenger

[@donsmith3038]

I have a 7 3/8" wrist. Watch looks good on it. I think I'll get the 136660 and give my son my 126610LN.

[@masterwatch]

I think everyone knows DavidSW because of ArchieLuxury... The Deepsea is an excellent watch, the 70hr power reserve on the new models is very good.

[@ticzone34]

"Can I be honest?" ....yes.

[@22jeepmojave75]

Best looking dive in the world. I love mine 136660-003.

[@williamstalvey6920]

1st one with narrow bracelet looks the best

[@PapriceP]

I never use the glidelock but I use the flip lock 8 to 9 times a day so I'm glad I didn't upgrade to the new one.

[@rhome4206]

Why would you use the fliplock 8 to 9 times a day? Does your wrist suddenly expand or contract 26mm?

[@charlesbates9389]

Excellent

[@derhampaul2182]

Its a nice watch

[@anthonybielobockie4991]

A 3,900 meter watch for my 40 meter body. As AvE likes to say "there ain't no kill like overkill."

[@Frank-rl3qr]

how 136660 case height？

[@roviewz6563]

Same

[@Frank-rl3qr]

@@roviewz6563 thaks

[@coclim5712]

It beat the older two models easily. 7 differences between 136660 and 126660 if you know how to spot them. All in KZbin.

[@absolutely2935]

116660 is the ultimate watch here - the original always pushes ahead in the longer term - very low numbers too , watch this one go up over the ten years , potentially will leave the Daytona

[@jrobinson5661]

bracelet is too narrow…126660 is the option

[@absolutely2935]

@@jrobinson5661 don’t disagree J with the thickness conversation - but and a big but , this is the thing that makes it different - hence will be the one

[@Hocksman]

I went with the 126660. It has a better calibre movement from the previous generation; and an improved bigger bracelet. I didn’t like the changes they made to the 136660 and those were not in my opinion improvements to the watch (like why on earth would you want the flip lock removed?).

[@paulhammal7231]

Guess you’ve got the 116660 then?😂

[@absolutely2935]

@@paulhammal7231 have owned both, just wish never sold the early one as it was perfect 👍

[@the_shadow_realm5110]

That’s a lot of 6’s!!!! 😬

[@joeybiden7755]

Roman Barf would have lied and told the buyer that’s what he paid for the watch. Anytime someone tries to beat him down on price he always says that…😂

[@wch4972]

正

[@udosmesovsky4249]

Thats not an investment piece. It should be a serious dive watch, but the 136660 lost its extension feature. Therefore its just a showoff watch for desk divers in a suit 😂, nothing else.

[@anthonybielobockie4991]

The Explorer is for fake mountaineers, and the Explorer II is for make-believe cave explorers. Basically, the timepiece equivalent of a Range Rover that has never so much as put a tire onto grass. I'm pretty sure I'm getting an Explorer II to wear to my tech job 😂

[@mcrayfourd]

you can get the cameron quite cheap now

[@metal_concerts_austria5400]

where?

[@toodamnskippy6220]

@@metal_concerts_austria5400 Nowhere.

[@aron7439]

✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻🍸

[@thetruthhurts7500]

The Rolex Deepsea is the King hands down....but only the black dial....The blue dial is rather feminine and gimmicky. The black dial deepsea with new dimensions (2018-2023) is the only way to go. The black dial is the mans mans Rolex. The classic black dial IS Rolex.

[@hunttoo3480]

That's your opinion. I'm getting the blue dial in two months.

[@impexRQ]

The blue dial is stunning- it’s the best dial Rolex produced

[@hunttoo3480]

@@impexRQ Indeed!