This is a short video that explores using the 'solve' function of the CAS environment, both with real numbers and with complex numbers. The video also describes the programming a simple "two resistors in parallel" program.
Пікірлер: 54
@viniciusgotosleep8 ай бұрын
I'm starting electrical engineering, this video has absolutely sold me on the HP Prime above the others. Operating it looks so seamless compared to the others.
@technics62152 жыл бұрын
This is the best explanation how HP Prime can be used in electrical engineering. Thank you Sir.
@BunkerSquirrel6 жыл бұрын
I love my Prime to death. I’ve had this thing for almost a year and it still blows me away how much it can do. Cheers!
@rolinychupetin6 жыл бұрын
I agree. It is quite an impressive machine.
@chef1arjunaidi4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Professor. After keeping the Prime in cold storage for a long time, i finally learned how to create a program. You're the best, I wished you were my professor. Looking forward to learning from you again.
@rolinychupetin4 жыл бұрын
Once you get acquainted with the CAS of the Prime, you'll neer look back. I only wished that it had existed when I was an undergraduate student. But then again, I was the transition generation from slide rules to the HP-35, the first one, the original one. I still remember the thrill of finding a sine, or a cosine just at the press of a key (before the 35, engineering students used booklets with tables to find logs and sines cosines and the like.)
@nagyelraheb41658 ай бұрын
Thank you for your videos. I'm an engineer who has the same memories of sin, cos and log tables on our desks during an exam :) I remember the smile on my face when my first calculator gave an answer of "E" for 5 divided by zero :))@@rolinychupetin
@henrikkliebhan48746 ай бұрын
Superb video, with a high density of information and the granularity to understand the idea behind the method you show. I like your approach to explain in such a "friendly advisor mode"!
@rolinychupetin6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@VictorNoelCoryPaz6 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Great educational videos.
@ALAIDI4 жыл бұрын
Very nice and beautiful explanation, thank you sir
@Cosecant185 жыл бұрын
Awsome! Thanks!
@marlonhermilio6 жыл бұрын
Muchas gracias señor rollini chupetin
@rolinychupetin6 жыл бұрын
Si va a courses.ece.ubc.ca/elec202 y entra en la opcion de "FREE SOFTWARE", encontrara los listados de los programitas que uso en mis videos, como los cinco de solucion de triangulos, SSS, SSA y otros. Tambien los de manipulacion de numeros complejos. Buena suerte.
@crocellian29726 жыл бұрын
Great. Do more.
@kevinclaypool6345 Жыл бұрын
Super useful thanks!
@rolinychupetin Жыл бұрын
Great, thanks.
@darioeufrausinodesousa40554 жыл бұрын
HP the best calculador.
@rolinychupetin4 жыл бұрын
so far ... let's see what they come up with next. :)
@vdmur79523 жыл бұрын
Great!
@shantk73782 жыл бұрын
Great series of videos! How would you suggest increasing the number of paralleled resistor values in the program from just 2 values to many (R1,R2,Rn...)?
@rolinychupetin2 жыл бұрын
Great suggestion! Here it is below. The trade off is that the input is a list of the resistances to be connected in parallel, example: RPR({3,5,2}) returns ... well, you'll see. You can make that list as long as you need to. the code is relatively straightforward too: EXPORT RPR(m) BEGIN LOCAL gtotal,n,ix; n:=size(m); FOR ix FROM 1 TO n STEP 1 DO gtotal:=gtotal+1/m(ix); END; RETURN(1/gtotal); END;
@shantk73782 жыл бұрын
@@rolinychupetin Thank you! This is great. I would love to see a video on some of the other programs you've written such as the Butterworth and Chebyshev filter programs! I am absolutely loving the HP Prime.
@dionlemans67472 жыл бұрын
Strangely i get an syntax error, can anyone explain me why? i've filled the program exactly the same in on my prime and checked it three times?
@pm_16 ай бұрын
Dear Professor, Thank you for your channel. It is valuable. But I think I see a "bug" in the RR program. RETURN should not use the "()" to return value - using it, you return the complex number a real part :). I noticed that by a small mistake. I wanted to round the output to 2 digits, so I wrote RETURN(ROUND(r1*r2/(r1+r2)),2). I was surprised that the evaluation was x+2i. I made a mistake, and I realized output is a complex number. Now I have "RETURN ROUND(r1*r2/(r1+r2),2)", and it works perfectly.
@rolinychupetin6 ай бұрын
I waited before responding to give time for you to realize the actual source of the wrong operation of your program. Here it goes. The line that you wrote, let me copy it RETURN(ROUND(r1*r2/(r1+r2)),2) has an error indeed, but it is not the optional parentheses after RETURN, it is that you closed the ROUND( bracket too early, it should be after the ",2" so the ROUND function receives the two parameters that it expects. Do try RETURN(ROUND(r1*r2/(r1+r2),2)). I commend your willingness to explore functions in the PRIME, but I strongly advise against using ROUND in what will be an intermediate result in a longer and more complex computation. The loss of those digits may, most likely, add up to a wrong final answer in the solution using RR. I've advised my students against that in class, and I thought it fair to add the same advice here. Thanks for your contribution and enthusiasm. There used to be a course on the propagation of errors in long computations. It was part of a Physics lab in the first year. I hope that it is still taught.
@caulist6 жыл бұрын
Boa noite professor, Queria sua opinião pessoal por gentileza sobre se compensa trocar a hp50g pela hp prime. Pois tenho a hp 48 a mais de 15 anos e ela tem uma peculiaridade que a prime não tem:2100 funcoes embutidas (nativas), o que ajuda muito pra programar a mesma.coisa que a prime não tem.pois tenho mais de 50 programas na 50g e estes programas não é compatível com a prime.grato. Claudio Bahia _ brasil
@rolinychupetin6 жыл бұрын
Prezado Sr. Claudio, Eu mesmo, segurei meu HP-50g durante o tempo que pude. Mas o tempo não aguarda ninguém. O HP-50g ainda é uma máquina poderosa, mas o HP-PRIME é como o HP-50g em esteróides. É verdade que você terá que traduzir todos os seus programas para Pascal (o idioma nativo do HP-50g). Mas Pascal é tão amigável (foi concebido como uma língua para escrever programas fáceis de ler) que a tradução será direta e gratificante, uma ótima oportunidade para aprender o poder do HP-PRIME. No entanto, se você se sentir muito confortável com seu HP-48gx (eu também tenho um desses), e não falta nada, e você não sente como aprender uma máquina / idioma totalmente novo e recodando cinquenta programas, então mantenha o 48gx .
@charlesschwer17926 жыл бұрын
HP 50, piece of cake. HP Prime, I get answers but I do not know what I am doing.
@rolinychupetin6 жыл бұрын
I love the HP-50g too, but they don't make it anymore. I used to have three HP-50gs, but my daughter put one of them in the washing machine, along with my blankets :( I also have an HP-49gx, and I used to have an HP-67, and HP-25, (my brother lost my HP-35, original package, a vintage machine), and of course my HP-41c. The HP-Prime, in my opinion, is a worthy successor to this aristocratic line of machines.
@charlesschwer17926 жыл бұрын
rolinychupetin You are right, I checked at Amazon, there are already gone. They are used, and no one knows what version they are selling. I have 2.15 and do not want to go back to 2.08. Times are changing.
@anhvunguyen19895 ай бұрын
Dear Professor, Apologies for the late comment, I just found and purchased a HP Prime G2 for my Engineering studies, and am very grateful for your videos. For this one, however, when I tried to solve for w using the exact steps you have mentioned, instead of nice numbers, I got some very strange, long results with _y and _x. Do you know why this may be the case and how it can be changed? (FYI I have tried again with the virtual emulator, and got the same result)
@rolinychupetin5 ай бұрын
Try using fsolve instead of solve and let me know.
@mattneff12628 ай бұрын
Professor, do you prefer the newer programming environment over the classic RPL?
@rolinychupetin8 ай бұрын
It grows on you very quickly.
@gabrielaaiolfi48436 жыл бұрын
Can i solve the last equation simply using the "i" intead of defining j?
@rolinychupetin3 жыл бұрын
of course. I define 'j' as in common practice in electrical engineering because 'i' is (in EE) usually a current.
@technics62152 жыл бұрын
Do I need HP Prime calculator, or there is PC software that remembers programs and settings? I have Prime emulator for Android, but entering big equations is a bit painful on calculator keyboard
@NickApostolakis11 ай бұрын
There is a free program for pc p, Mac and Linux
@andrelclucato3 жыл бұрын
I had a HP 48S, then a 48GX. Now I've just bought a HP prime. However, in the 48, at the solve app, i used to use the equations with or without units. More than that, whit any unit as desired, since compatible with the equation. Is that possible on HP Prime? I'dnt figured out how to do this. In the equation V=S.t, entering S in 'm', t in 's', I could get 'S' in mph, or kph, or ly/y, independently of others units. Is that possible in the Prime?
@rolinychupetin3 жыл бұрын
Dear Mr. Lucato, Usually, the equations that I solve with the HP Prime imply the units. For instance, in an induction motor, the rotating magnetic field angular velocity can be given by three different formulas depending on the units: (1) n = f/p (n in revolution per second, f in hertz and p has no units); or perhaps (2) n = 60f/p (n in revolution per minute, f in hertz and p without units); or even (3) w = 2 pi f / p (w in radians per second, f in hertz and p without units). Similarly in everyithing else of electric equipment and electronics that I work with. So the equation is different depending on the units. The CAS deals with the math, not with the units. I hope that this answers your question. Regards,
@andrelclucato3 жыл бұрын
@@rolinychupetin Yes, I understand. I think this is a disadvantage for the Prime, but I have to deal with that. Thank you!
@alistercarmichael49902 жыл бұрын
The firmware now (2022) has unit conversion and si representation. Some constants are also part of the OS. You could build scaling factors in as the prof suggests, use a unit type for each (quantity) variable, express the output as a unit, or use the converter as a distinct operation after calculation. I am new to this device but it looks like just about anything can be mixed together as long as we are mindful of our reference units.
@homo1925 ай бұрын
When I press check after writing this simple resistor program, the (physical G2) device returns a "syntax error". I'm stuck there.
@rolinychupetin4 ай бұрын
The syntax error sends the cursor to the "offending" bit in the code. It could be as simple as a typo in the name of a variable.
@EstesZ76 жыл бұрын
How do you solve a system of complex equations?
@rolinychupetin3 жыл бұрын
Do you mean equations with complex coefficients?
@phrack99986 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, but I cannot duplicate your answers on the last part with j and Omega formula. I've tried it both in the Android app and the PC emulator. I've verified my settings to what you had in the first video and followed step by step in both videos but I can't get it to simplify to a simple answer. What I get has a _x at the beginning added to a whole bunch of different operations at solve (IM(Req)=0,w) part.
@rolinychupetin6 жыл бұрын
I suggest that you delete variables that may have been defined in your calculator and may be replaced into the expressions that you are working with. Something like that did happen to me at some point in the past. In a future video we will explore variables in the HP-PRIME.
@phrack99986 жыл бұрын
rolinychupetin I did try a Purge on the variables to no avail. I'm was also a fresh install that I used to follow along with.
@rolinychupetin6 жыл бұрын
I'll leave your question open on this board with the hope that another of the readers can comment and find the answer to this conundrum.
@AnnaVahtera4 жыл бұрын
On the off-chance someone reads this so far after the video was released: WHY do you have to remember to add the multiplication sign? Can't the HP Prime understand "2x"? Do you always have to specify the multiplication sign, even if you don't in, like, any other brand calculator, ever?
@rolinychupetin4 жыл бұрын
You can write 2x, and the Prime will understand that you mean 2*x, but if you want to type x2, then you must include the x*2.