Rolls Royce CEO: "This NEW Engine Will Change The Entire Aviation Industry!"

The world's biggest jet engine isn't the General Electric GE9X, but it's a close contender. The true title goes to the Rolls-Royce Ultrafan, which is still in its testing phase. Rolls-Royce has pushed it to full power, hinting at its potential impact on aviation. This massive engine represents the future of air travel.
✈️ Don't forget to LIKE and SUBSCRIBE for more travel-related content! ✈️
Tags: rolls royce,rolls royce aviation,rolls royce engine,rolls royce plane,rolls royce plane engine,rolls royce plane engine start,rolls royce new engine,e fan x,ultrafan rolls royce,rr engine,rolls royce aviation engines,rolls royce aircraft engine,rolls royce flight engine,rolls royce news,boeing,airbus,aviation,boeing news,airbus news,boeing 747,airbus a380,tufan erginbilgiç,tufan erginbilgiç rolls royce,rolls royce ceo,rolls royce 2023

[@suthiraphanassarat8669]

What's the advantage of RR ultra fan engine over GE's 9X engine?

[@212MPH]

Get your facts correct. Rolls Royce motors are a totally different company to the engine maker.

[@OhAwe]

...I mean, yes they're separate now. I feel "totally different" makes it quite unclear though. They were the same company prior to the 70's. Now they're basically Bentley and BMW. Both companies are making engines.

[@tommymorrison6478]

@@OhAwe You don't understand. Rolls Royce Aero Engines are totally separate from Rolls Royce Cars...............and Bentley. Volkswagen own Bentley, BMW own Rolls Royce cars, and Rolls Royce Holdings own Rolls Royce cars. 3 different companies.

[@OhAwe]

@@tommymorrison6478 They are. It seems it's you that doesn't understand.

[@tommymorrison6478]

@@OhAwe It seems you (a) can't admit you're wrong and/or (b) don't understand English very well.

[@OhAwe]

@@tommymorrison6478 Check out your whole as family tree of incestors and be quiet.

[@rosewhite---]

it's interesting that big engines only have ball bearings as all the weight is centrifuged off when the engine runs.

[@DerekWalsh-l4i]

Clickbait title. Engine manufacturers throughout the world have been saying the same thing for at least 10 years, and nothing has really changed. No engine is going to change the entire aviation industry for ever.

[@briangriffiths1285]

Oh for gods sake the auto company is nothing to do with the aero engine business.

[@brianpepper8274]

Rolls is now owned by TATA - an Indian company.

[@crazyhorse1771]

@@brianpepper8274 No it isn't. Rolls Royce Motor Cars is owned by BMW.

[@AGTC009]

@@brianpepper8274 You mean JLR !!

[@AGTC009]

@@brianpepper8274 And Bentley is VW Audi Group !

[@phensriwood8081]

Take it easy guys, we all know the cars and aviation separated long ago.

[@TurningoffyourGaslights]

A high bypass turbo fan...gee...we've not seen that before ...wow!

[@johannesstrasser3689]

7:20 Unlike its predecessors, the ultrafan will have a two-spool architecture.

[@peebeedee6757]

A lot of Bullsh?t here. Rolls Royce have recently scooped up a $2.6billion order for 400 number of the new R-130 engines to re-equip the entire 70 plus USAF B-52 fleet against US home competition. These are not huge diameter fan engines and will mount two on each pod as per the current B-52 layout. The R-130 will be perfect for equipping narrow bodied aircraft.

[@mohammedibrahim42]

Rolls royce outstanding company jet engine is pride of uk well done english people 😊🇬🇧 british are Genius

[@RoyParavinic]

New engine is always better than old one.

[@DreamMonster7X]

RR does NOT take away the innovations of the GE engines and other engines. That's like saying my kid is going to change humanity, because he's so much smarter, compassionate, empathetic, wealthier, giving and loving than the rest of humanity and humanity will change forever.

[@johnakkman9993]

Quite the opposite in fact. Theb biggest thing GE innovated are carbon fanblades. The rest have been achieved or revolutionised by other manufacturers.

[@Greatdome99]

Three spool engines are certainly smoother than two spool. On the 757, RR RB211s are hard-mounted; the PW2000s require shock mounts.

[@steveburke7675]

"This NEW Engine Will Change The Entire Aviation Industry!" We literally hear this weekly.........pfft.

[@RalphEllis]

The Avco-504 on the Bae-146, was a geared turbofan way back in the mid 80s. R

[@ronadelacruz9675]

TRENT ULTRAFAN IS BEATING OVER GE9X

[@EddieBarrientos-iv6kc]

It seems the new engine will be comparable to the GE90-110B to thrust output.

[@ASYoutube2024]

Deltaburn would make that even more efficient with their parent pending IP

[@PatRick-bg4dm]

Maybe this unfaned duct could be an option for smaller aircraft…

[@marcrodet4900]

Misleading title and content. It keeps on saying it's revolutionary but shows nothing revolutionary, just alleged improvements

[@nathd1748]

@marcrodet4900 It absolutely IS revolutionary. GE are still faffing with the GE9X and this engine can be hung straight on the 777x and give double digit fuel economy over the YET TO BE IN SERVICE GE9X!!!

[@marcrodet4900]

​@@nathd1748 How is that revolutionary? Double digit fuel economy is not a revolution...

[@johnakkman9993]

It reaches bypass ratios and compressor ratios that wouldn’t be possible with conventional turbofan shafts hence the significantly reduced fuel economy. It uses a power gearbox which is something no engine manufacturer was able to achieve at such thrust levels because there isn’t a gearbox powerfull enough to handle such high forces. The only application of gearboxes are on the P&W 1000 engines and avro RJ but only because it’s low thrust. Consider the fact rolls royce innovated aviation technology when GE was just making fridges and lightbulbs. GE is still stuck on a two shaft design and did nothing but bribe aircraft manufacturers and boasts numbers that aren’t their own. Yes, this engine is revolutionary and if airlines aren’t greedy, you are going to see that on the pricing of your ticket next time you’ll fly to your wife’s boyfriend.

[@Aydosh1991]

Derby is pronounced “Darby”.

[@thadiusthudpucker]

not in Australia

[@RasheedKhan-he6xx]

It's an AI voice reading the text.

[@billolsen4360]

And Worcestershire is pronounced "Woo-ster."

[@openbabel]

Rolls Royce will be at the global Farnborough air show. It has according to the BSC Consulting Group other innovative products are coming to the market soon.

[@dhulon09]

Mistake leaving AIEA group. Now need build 25k thrust engine prototype for small planes, Ultra fan at 25k +++ thrust for small jets 320, 737 etc

[@steverobinson2389]

Also Rolls Royces ACCEL project centres around battery powered engines for aircraft

[@cabbagepatch8947]

This engine has to find a wing to fit under.

[@imperial_corner]

RR has come a long way since ruining the L1011 project.

[@hakantorstensson8053]

Not sure if a grasped the narrator. Is the fan equipped with a linkage for variable pitch in flight?

[@imperial_corner]

I think that the variation is found in the different rotation speeds of the different shafts. Which is pretty wild!

[@user-yt198]

Yes, Wikipedia says Ultrafan will have variable pitch fan. See "Variable pitch fan" article.

[@RZ-ey9jk]

Not for the upcoming generation.

[@olumideiluyomade7613]

The bottom line is this - it is not exactly new technology. It is merely being done on an unprecedented scale! The engine being developed is a massive wide-body variant of a geared turbofan. Simple. The GTF designed by PW was applicable to narrow body planes only. It produced a maximum of 35,000lbs ft of thrust. The Rolls Royce Ultra-fan on the other hand is designed to produce up to 110,000lbs ft of thrust, meaning it could replace and power even the upcoming Boeing 777x. PW and GE do not have any such engine at that scale currently. Now, because the technology is scalable and modular, RR would be applying the same technology to all of its product over time (wide-body engines). Now, the fact that RR is completely out of the narrow body market means it has its eyes on that lucrative market. With the ultra-fan technology being scalable (It can be scaled down) and the IAE V2500 commitment being no longer binding, RR is free to enter the 24,000 - 35,000lbs ft engine market, which is where all the action and juice is, with a new highly competitive product.

[@abarratt8869]

Boeing’s NMA didn’t happen partly because RR told Boeing publicly that it wasn’t going to build them an engine for it. RR’s experience with the risk share on 787 was terrible and they weren’t going to fall for that again. Looking at Boeing now, seems like a good call by RR. Ultrafan can match PW’s gtf, but will trash GE. They don’t need to beat PW gtf because PW can’t make enough of them. There’s room for two in the market.

[@Charles-sn7zy]

Fall for what ..so it's Boeing's fault they couldn't make a reliable engine to compete with GE on the 787 ? Yeah right !!

[@abarratt8869]

@@Charles-sn7zy Apparently, Boeing obliged RR to stop development work on the T1000 early so that they could "deliver" 787. Then, Boeing had loads of problems and 4 years delay, but wouldn't let RR work on the design during these delays. Development of the T1000 started in 2004, was certified in 2007, 787 entered service 4 years later in 2011. During those 4 years, nothing could change in the engine (because it'd require recertification). Don't forget that GE were having similar problems, they just got lucky that they manifested earlier. At one point early on, the LP shaft (which was suffering from hydrogen embrittlement) on the GeNX was crumbling to dust on zero-hours engines and spewing their power turbine out onto the tarmac as aircraft taxied for test flights. They'd got some treatment process wrong. Like everything else on 787, the original development timescales imposed by Boeing were absurd. RR seems content these days to do business with Airbus (which, anyway, brings in more money). GE must be losing money at a rapid rate on programs like 777X (not delivered), 787 (poor production rates by Boeing). No wonder GE are asking Airbus if they might be let in on A350... If the A350neo and/or A330neoneo does come along with Ultrafan it is going to beat 787 by a country mile on efficiency and kill its market stone dead. That would leave Boeing asking RR to please do a variant for 787. RR might just say "no thank you", for any money. The costs of certifying an engine on an airframe are high. The tooling set up costs are high. All that needs to be recouped over a reliable, smooth running aircraft production run (RR and GE can't get money for engines unless Boeing are delivering aircraft to customers). You don't get smooth running productions runs out of Boeing any more, but the problems were already impacting suppliers nearly 20 years ago. With Boeing as it is at the moment, with their huge delivery issues arising from their poor quality control, RR doing new business with Boeing comes with a large financial risk tariff that Boeing would have to finance.

[@Charles-sn7zy]

@@abarratt8869 Thankyou for that Airbus infomercial !! And they still can't get the T 1000 right ,with the latest AD going into effect.. So how much time do you think it will take to finally get the T1000 right.. 20 years? Sorry ,but your story is nothing more than a big pile of rubbish !

[@RichardKCollins]

With very little effort now, direct 3D control of airflows and energy for motion will change overnight. Rigid designs, fixed production facilities, and relatively small power will be things of the old past. "64 MegaWatts"? people will laugh, "don't you mean 64 GigaWatts!!" And they will laugh and laugh, "You are still using chemical bonds to store your energy, using fire and wasting oxygen?!!" "Where are your atomic fuel cells!!" Filed as (Get the rigid mass out. Stop the rigid thinking.) Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation

[@Aviatrix2022]

Wow! Thank you so much for your support, it really helps us and we appreciate it. ❤️

[@paladin0654]

So the SFC for both is.....? Long way to go for both technically, not to mention what happens with the airframers and the market.

[@Dyson_Cyberdynesystems]

How about Rolls Royce figure out their Nacelle suppliers out first??

[@mikedennington8856]

RR is a German company for the cars. These are different companies totally.

[@AlexLancashirePersonalView]

I worked on parts for the RB211 at Lucas Aerospace in Burnley, UK .... 60 years ago????

[@billolsen4360]

Any relation to those people who made Lucas electrical components for my TR-6?

[@synthetictv5340]

Long live the GE90 Also, RR isn't topping the sound of the GE90.

[@fedism]

They are responsible for the trent 800 sound. This won’t be a challenge for them.

[@alan4yt]

Given the British Parliament has no engineers in its government or its stock exchange who see engineering as a nasty, dirty, working class business, unlike all other successful nations. RR relies on classic British innovation: lets remember, almost every aircraft flying is built on British inventions, from the fuselage fatigue, window design, first jet engine, carbon fibre, radar, gyro navigation, radio, Hydraulic undercarriage, videos in seat backs, the fasted passenger plane Concord and many others each decried by the British treasury, who shiver at each new British invention.

[@barryporteous4904]

I would think the Rolls-Royce people would be a bit embarrassed by the lack of accuracy and the click-baity-ness.

[@AGTC009]

But all the talk & rumours are that they are recommissioning the Boeing 747's & the Airbus A380's so the market & bulk carrying is on the upturn !..& I am sure RR could scale down this new engine to make them fit smaller aircraft lets see what happens !!

[@benediktmorak4409]

Hopefully they let the Engineers decide what and how and when to do it. And not the beancounters in their fancy offices . Who are only counting and crying profit,profit,profit.

[@happyhamster7712]

I agree. I think these days the accountants decide what the engineers have to try and build. It working very well. The last batch of new engineers have had lots of problems

[@benediktmorak4409]

@@happyhamster7712 and it will mot stop as long as the beancounters and stamp-pad protectors have the say.

[@billolsen4360]

I used to be a bean counter, but there was nothing fancy in my office.

[@billolsen4360]

@@benediktmorak4409 You were almost onto something there.

[@Bristolcentaurus]

the napier lion is going to replace all rolls royce engines

[@sinperdon7508]

It is just improvementsz, the end.

[@mabdullah9190]

GE ENGINES R THE BEST

[@nickgiles7568]

Rolls made a terrible decision to exit the 737/A320/A321 market and will always be playing catch up. I think the optimism expressed in this video is misplaced

[@annoyingbstard9407]

I know. That’s why I demanded you be made their CEO but they just ignored me.

[@CWWahl56]

GE and CFM would have to stop making engines all together and even then it would take decades to replace the current installed base. RR will never catch GE.

[@dhulon09]

need offer it to a350 1000, a new version=. ULTRA FAN 100k for a350

[@erwingrupo03]

Challenge space x they will give u good fighter

[@gunsaway1]

Geared fans are a big problem.

[@dknowles60]

Ge has had jet engines Produce over 130k lbs of Thrust. Rolls Royce cant even get to 100k lbs of thrust

[@Beensash]

False. RR actually reached 100,000 lb in testing with their engines first

[@dknowles60]

@@Beensash and ge has reach a lot higher

[@Beensash]

@@dknowles60 so? RR never tried to make a rival to the biggest GE engine.

[@dknowles60]

@@Beensash yes

[@gottfriedheumesser1994]

Another engine to ground the planes by hidden problems? No one of the three could change the entire aviation industry.

[@johnhaydon4055]

More internet twaddle.

[@ricardokowalski1579]

terrible robo voice. poor script jumps back and forth

[@74quo]

Let's just stick to the tried and trusted😁😉

[@GrowFoodSustainably]

Walking to a destination.

[@dknowles60]

Roll Royce is not all that great. is is only at best 30% of the Jet engines in the World

[@davetomlinson9063]

For Christ sake enough with this nonsense of changes to industry,hyperbole not needed.

[@maxremigio21]

quit that luminous annoying transitions each 5 seconds. It's desperating to the eyes.

[@johnsonfitzgerald2696]

Ai voices still

[@theodoredesmarais4219]

Hydrogen ..............

[@prithmusic]

The most bullshit and misleading video I've ever seen. Wasted 9 minutes of my life telling that Rolls Royce is testing an engine bigger than the GE9X

[@steverobinson2389]

A little condescending to teenagers and you mispronounced Derby.

[@vivekathawale5615]

more than 3 mins into the video and the guy does not get to the point for which I had come here, so i'm leaving.

[@seanjohn3498]

buy rolls royce stock

[@Golfer-rn7lh]

If RR has come up with anything innovative it'll be the first time since WW2

[@Visitor2Earth]

The computer robot voice narration is AWFUL...TERRIBLE...UNLISTENABLE! After 4:18, I couldn't take it anymore.

[@marcmaillet3044]

Too many parts.

[@Adventures-pk8lg]

It's pronounced "DAR-bee" not "DER-bee".

[@americanknow8232]

They are obsolete in front of Chiense new engine

[@imacmill]

No it won't.

[@photoman152]

This just seems to be a rehash of this Mentor Now video from 10 months ago.. kzbin.info/www/bejne/h2WooISEoaqLb7ssi=SBekxmjRA0tC3MNG

[@rickboerma3392]

I hate these auto generated videos

[@juliocezar6998]

Fui o primeiro a dar o like.

[@johnchristmas7522]

More to the point, this is OLD NEWS, said last year. WHEN will this engine be CERTIFIED because until it is, this video is pointless as is the engine.

[@RogerBurton-q2s]

Learn how to pronounce Derby, the er is pronounced AR.

[@billolsen4360]

That's because too many Brits talk like Eliza Doolittle's old dad.

[@devroombagchus7460]

What a lot of nonsense.

[@linmao3989]

GE9x is better

[@johnakkman9993]

Lol no

[@MarcoKiller-d9s]

Stupidity. Creating unnecessary contents for making profits.

[@siriosstar4789]

👎