Rome vs Greeks | Massive Cinematic Historical Battle of Magnesia 190 BC | Total War

[@VikingRik]

Great vid, absolutely brilliant. The Seleucids are by far my favourite faction to play as in Rome 2. I've always been fascinated by the Seleucid dynasty, especially since they are not as well known and written about as the other Successor states. So much so that I specialised in Seleucid history at University. Great to see a video featuring one of there greatest Monarchs. Please keep up the great work.

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Glad you enjoyed!

[@Kvs-vf9nt]

I'm interested in them too. Can you tell how the huge Seleucid Empire actually fell? I know they had intern conflicts but still such a huge empire that was actually a kingdom if I'm not mistaken...

[@VikingRik]

@@Kvs-vf9nt It was a Kingdom you are right, It was really a combination of Alexander's and Achaemenid Kinship. The Empire fell due to a combination of civil wars fought by claimants to the throne, satraps revolting against the kings and external enemies attacking. The Bactrian satrap Diodotos declared independence a created and empire/kingdom of his own called The Greco Bactrian Empire. The Parni tribes took over Parthia and fought to expand into the rest of Iran whilst Rome after defeating Antiochus II took all Seleucid territory west of the tarsus mnts and gave it to their allies such as Rhodes and Pergamon who had originally been under Seleucid control. After Magnesia the Seleucids had constant interference from Rome backing satraps who wanted independence and backing rival claimants to the throne. Rome apparently even sent agents to Syria to hamstring all the Seleucid Indian war elephants. And that's it really, over time Parthia, Armenia and Rome took territory until all that was left was Syria which was finally conquered by Pompey. Hope this helps. 😀

[@Kvs-vf9nt]

@@VikingRik Very interesting. Thanks men!

[@RagnaCloud13]

Antiochus III: and where will I get some money? (Crickets chirping)

[@LetsSeeYourKungFu]

these are really well done bro. Obviously the history is covered in top notch form. but even the camera work and cinematics. pretty kick-ass stuff

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

thank you, man! I'm happy you're enjoying this!

[@AirvacaRanger]

It appears Antiochus made the same mistake at Magnesia that he had made 27 years prior at the battle of Raphia. He pushed the right flank to quickly, got caught up in the chase of a fleeing adversary, which ultimately led to the tattering of the Seleucid line. Those who do not learn from history.....

[@tayrussell2921]

create diversity equality and inclusion

[@michalschade7734]

@@tayrussell2921no, it’s weakness

[@tayrussell2921]

@@michalschade7734 thats what I just said?

[@Hillbilly001]

Love how you show the Roman army. In this era the Legionary provided their own arms and armor. That's plainly visible in the vid. Different color shields although the same kind. Outstanding! Cheers.

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks Paul, glad you liked it

[@Hillbilly001]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI I didn't just like it, I loved it! The Romans have always been fascinating to me especially before the Marion Reforms. The 4 lines, Velites, Hastati, Principi and the Triaii. Way above what everyone else had. Love the work. Cheers.

[@kingspore5000]

We senate and people of Rome request Mithridatic wars and Social war cinematics. Such an underrated conflicts

[@ajithsidhu7183]

I second this

[@1stSgt.DieMKay]

Dito

[@Eddy1938-b]

I veto the notion and request The first Punic war which is even more underrated.

[@crackshack2]

Sad the events that led to the fall of the Republic are barely given attention.

[@humbertovazquez5909]

Kudos ! One of the best videos I've seen on legion vs phalanx.

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks!

[@moistmike4150]

Yikes! That Battle of Magnesia must've been terrifying! I'm just glad no one got hurt.

[@VLSG_WARGAMING]

it was so much fun i was there. they gave out juice boxes after

[@Eddy1938-b]

Great video as always, this vid made me feel nostalgic again for Rome and I am listening to History of Rome again. Could you recreate naval battles too? Btw do you narrate your vids.

[@Türkiye4568]

Hello, I saw your video. And personally, I was very happy. Unfortunately, this war is not well known nowadays. I am from Manisa and even I do not know about it. This is a shame. I think it is a matter of pride that you brought these wars to light.

[@RecepGültekinMalatya44]

I'm studying tourism and this is the first time I've encountered such a war. Thank you very much.❤🇹🇷🇹🇷

[@QwentyJ]

Best you've done so far my dude

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thank you man!

[@philRminiatures]

Informative, realistic... and bloody, great video!

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks, glad you enjoyed my vid!

[@thehturt5480]

The idea with the small map was very good allowing us viewers to really fallow the battle💯❤️

[@Eneas-el-Troyano]

Excellent! Some ideas for you: make the cimbrian wars , rome against parthia and scythia , Baktrian kingdom against the mauryan kingdom , Pergamon vs Galatians , Odrysian vs Macedon , Bosphorus kingdom vs Galatians , rome vs saba , etruscans vs celts , iberians vs rome, Samnites vs Syracuse , the Seleucids vs Judea (there Was a mod about the Judea faction)

[@andresalphie5400]

Yes, Bactria vs Mauryan would be great.😄👍

[@Kvs-vf9nt]

Great cinematic battle! Edit can you do one Sulla against Pontus? Or the Sullani against Mariani. You can choose. I really would like to see that. DEI has the Mitharadetic wars campaign now.

[@regiardinugraha4271]

I'm always waiting for you to make another video

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks. Hopd you liked this one

[@andresalphie5400]

This content is outstanding! By far the best I have ever seen. Brilliant in any aspect, even small details. Many thanks!

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Awesome. I am glad you enjoyed it

[@TAttiusMaximvs]

Superb video, many thanks!

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Appreciate it

[@TheKarofaar]

One of the greatest battles of history.

[@serdarguven7076]

Thank you for the video..

[@poyp4125]

뭔가 역사 다큐멘터리를 보는 듯한 영상 편집이네요 재미있네요 잘보겠습니다

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

I hope you liked it

[@danielarens9941]

Great stuff!

[@valerymendes9761]

Gostei muito video, mostrando a Organização do Exército Romano.

[@RecepGültekinMalatya44]

Thank you ❤🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

[@BobSmith-dk8nw]

Very well done. I stopped playing that game because of the strategic map and how it handled things. I liked the first one better. .

[@joanjordamateu9417]

I absolutely agree. In total war PC game it is based only on the graphics not on the gameplay of the campaign map. This franchise will disappear if it does not evolve, it achieves a realistic historical recreation in terms of the number of men in the battlefield The implanted free mod system is nonsense, it should be called - Total Anarchy -

[@filimon9643]

Hi, do you think it would be interesting to do some kind of battle in the empire?

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

What do you mean? Do you have any in mind?

[@filimon9643]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI For example, you can have some kind of battle for American independence, the Seven Years' War, the Russian-Turkish War, or how Britain colonized India

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

@@filimon9643 good idea. I will see what I can do

[@filimon9643]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI Thank you

[@filimon9643]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI In about how many weeks will you be able to make an empire video?

[@vardanananyan1685]

which mod is this ?

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Divide et Impera

[@truckingmogul3254]

Great job

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks

[@Камиль-б1в]

Грандиозно!! благодарю за труд.! Хотелось бы увидеть фильмы про Аварский Каганат..

[@RickGamer123]

The voice is that you ?

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

I wish Rick :)

[@Purushottamchaturvedi]

One of the greatest battle 🔥

[@RomanumChristum]

Both our lines at the end of it got coated in so much blood they looked like tomatoes 😂

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks for your help again. It was fun recreating this battle

[@RomanumChristum]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI Yes it was, I again thank you for letting me help with videos. Really gives me something to do especially when life isn’t very smooth.

[@saffronsworld1508]

What a task it must have been to clean up the battlefield and dispose of the tens of thousands of dead bodies. The severely wounded on both side probably had to be put out of their misery. Imagine the PTSD the battle survivors suffered with.

[@Cleeon]

The way of thinking the ancient people, different with nowadays people. But yes, you're right about cleaning the battlefield and so on, we can see on Alexander the great movie, many young soldiers, must "put out of misery" By the war doctors

[@عليياسر-ذ5ب]

@@Cleeon The Egyptians and Babylonians say the wounded soldiers must be rescued, we need them

[@Cleeon]

@@عليياسر-ذ5ب yes, i ever read from Prophet Muhammad to his friends, that Egyptian, many from them is good people

[@عليياسر-ذ5ب]

@@Cleeon I was surprised by the pharaohs that they did not change the beliefs of the Jews while they were controlling Canaan and the Pharaoh Sheshonq the first made Ibn Suleiman prostrate to him and make his people slaves to the pharaoh Sheshonq

[@Cleeon]

@@عليياسر-ذ5ب sorry sir, maybe you still do not understand about ancient religion, but we can see about nowadays Jews, many of them, maybe still have old ways of religion in minds. Past ago, before Alexander the great, get some enlightenment (hope from the CREATOR) many great men, kings, nobles, and even some prophets.... This one, including Alexander the great teacher himself, Aristoteles. They believe that true religion, is their own ( and it seems, each nation/tribes have their own variety of religion) and exclusively only for them. So, Jews/prophet Moses religion is only for Israelites. Osiris and Horus, only for Egyptian. Even Aristoteles have some letter with warning to Alexander, reminds him "why you share and taught them, they're not us, they're not Hellenistic people". Same as, maybe Sumeria will never believe their gods and goddess will care Africans, but Africans have similar in minds. So, that's it, Persian will never even imagining Ahuramazda for Greek people, same as Odin, as for Nordic warrior, is only for them, and they will shocked if some city in Greek call their highest deity with Odin. I think, from what I learned, all happening around the time of Alexander the great and in East around the time of Siddhartha Gautama, then people thinking about, if this the truth, why we not share and teach to others.

[@elforeigner3260]

9:02 man, those dudes are immortal! 😂😂😂

[@anthonybateman7527]

Thanks for your great videos, I love history, but never good at this game, though I love to play.

[@Hillbilly001]

I'm afraid I can't smash the like button again, but the comment is a sacrifice to the Algorithm. Don't mind watching this for a 3rd time. Yeah, it's that good. Oh and all Hail the Algorithm. Cheers.

[@SM-ou9dh]

When was Antioch the great ever great in history?

[@tptallen4498]

I have a theory as to why the Romans did the triplex formation: It wasn't so that they could rotate between each other when the time called for it, it was so that they would have a zigzaged frontline which would break up professional enemy lines, where the enemy would charge and their Frontlines would immediately be surrounded. The Greeks would've fallen victim to this mostly because they fought with static phalanx formations. And the triarii would be the back up to cover up any holes the enemy would've made and poked them back. The equities would either attempt to face their cavalry counterparts or be another plugger when there wasn't enough triarii. Another theory is that they operated somewhat like the squares that was used in Waterloo, where the enemy would charge into the gaps only to find themselves in a deadly maze of swords, shields, and pilas. The triarii would be the last line to cut down enemies who were bold enough to find their way out of the maze. Equities would protect the flanks if the enemy decided to wrap around the outskirts of the formation, or charge into the maze like formation and trample the enemies. The only times where they would rotate is when they face similar units where the Hastati would make a long line with no gaps and the Princeps would swap them out whenever needed.

[@tptallen4498]

My second theory would make sense as to why Hannibal was so successful against the Romans, he outright refused to fall for the formation trick and instead attempted to wrap around the Romans.

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

I just don't know about the second theory. If they formed squares, they would be quite static. When, in fact, the majority of time, their tactic was to push the enemy with heavy force. The only time that didn't work was when fighting phalanx head on, so individual legionaire units were flexible enough to make a decision and wrap around them when their flanks were secure

[@tptallen4498]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI while I agree that they wouldn't be effective as static squares, let's consider that they aren't static and aren't really "squares" and that they still operated individually but still in unison with the other cohorts to guide them into the maze of death. Now that I think about it the first theory would work well with anyone, and the second one might really work well against unorganized barbaric tribes

[@tptallen4498]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI if I could post detailed drawings in the chat I would lmao

[@marioduva1411]

@@tptallen4498 Hannibal is so overrated , yes he won three battles in Italy but he lost the war, he never captured Rome and that’s the only battles he’d won but everyone seems to make him out to be some great strategist , actually when he was confronted by the same general shippione he got destroyed on home soil, at the end he lost everything so where is his greatness? He couldn’t hold the territory couldn’t subdue the romans, he got lucky but then it ran out.

[@JCox-zp1bk]

Well done and intriguing to watch. An observation, though, if you don't mind, is the groups were too far apart when spears were thrown. Arrows could fly that far maybe, but not spears. I'd also like letters - 'R' for Romans & 'S' for Seleucid - superimoposed over the groups of combatants as much as possible so the viewer can better keep up with who is moving where. Hard to do, obviously, when in close combat.

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks, some good points.

[@joseanponce4603]

What’s the name of the mod?

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

all details in my description of the video

[@stefanvella9807]

Magnesia is one hell of a battle that showed the Romans are serioualy badass. Great battle mate

[@LordByron1821]

The Romans did not fight Alexander. Otherwise he would've made mince meat out of the Romans . He was all about strategy.

[@stefanvella9807]

@@LordByron1821 I didn't say the Romans fought Alexander, during his time they were just like any other kingdom. But The Romans at their best they beat the Macedonian Phalanx and Alexander's successor's kingdoms/empires. I give number 1 to Alexander as histories greatest general but 2 to Julius Caesar.

[@MusikMyTaverna]

​@@stefanvella9807 People often compare units of armies. For me it is much more about strategy, preparation and commanding, not about which unit is better. In this battle, the Romans won because Scipio was a great military leader. If Alexander had to face the Romans maybe he wouldn't have used Phalanx and more flexible units instead. We'll never know🙂

[@воинсвета-м2с]

Супер спасибо за информацию

[@erikendacott9854]

Good video

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thank you

[@RaduFilip-zc7zm]

Fery best!!! Congrationalsis

[@Macro_Z1]

thx for Korean sub!

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Any time!

[@user-76122]

Очень красочно!!👍

[@Omurcan46]

pls Ottoman vs Austuria

[@ercankeser7655]

Plase Ankara battle, the captured sultan

[@azizshahzad2811]

could you do some islamic or indian battle

[@charlesrestivo870]

A bit more speech would be great

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Hey Charles. I do more in the most recent videos

[@germanico3zea379]

It's Europa Barbarorum 2?

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

No, it's in the description.

[@Cleeon]

Imagine there is no gunpowder, bullets, or rocket invention, and the war still classic just like on this video, you can see this type of war, live on TV news

[@marcusrosa9243]

Loved it

[@ericwafer1947]

Why no reserves?

[@gaydarmorasugve749]

I am a historia teacher and I send My congratulations

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thank you Gaydar, and welcome to the channel!

[@pa5287]

Terrific.

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Thanks

[@thegermaniccoenus2525]

Who's the Philip guy on the Seleucid side? Was it Philip V of Macedon? If it was, then that's an error. Philip V at that time is a Roman ally. It was his Macedonian army along with Thracian auxiliaries that protected the Roman camp and reinforced the retreating Romans.

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Not Philip of Macedon

[@thegermaniccoenus2525]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI That's good to hear.

[@МихаилЧиж-и1у]

Есть один недостаток, конница никогда не вступала в прямое противостояние между собой ввиду отсутствия сёдел и стремян

[@rzaaydogan404]

O caglarda bile orta asya daki TÜRK boyları eyer ve üzengi kullanıyorlardı bilgilerinize ekleyin lütfen

[@عليياسر-ذ5ب]

@@rzaaydogan404 The Turks were slaves in Mongolia at that time because of Oghuz Khan

[@RomanumChristum]

Actually that is false, cavalry at those times all the time entered combat without stirrups or saddles

[@николайкуликовский-и3к]

Это - всего лишь предположение. Так категорично утверждать, чего они никогда не делали мы не можем. Может не вступали, а, может иногда и вступали. А, может всегда вступали, когда этого требовала ситуация. Как человек ездивший верхом, на лошади, как с седлом, так и без, я не сказал бы что сражаться без седел и стремян невозможно. Просто не так удобно. К тому же, у тяжёлой конницы - катафрактариев - сёдла были и они отличались от сёдел средневековых рыцарей, пожалуй, только отсутствием стремян.

[@МихаилЧиж-и1у]

@@николайкуликовский-и3к ого, ну надо же, а теперь попробуйте без стремяни и седла пойти в копейную атаку, посмотрим с каким грохотом вы от туда вылетите🤣🤣🤣

[@brintwalstad8177]

How in the heck did they feed all of those soldiers?

[@robbiezen3155]

Madness placing elephants in the gaps between the phalanx blocks. And again just like at Raphia, Antiochos left his phalanx in the lurch. Again, the romans win because of the incompetence of the opposition’s leadership, much like at Cynoscephalae, Pydna etc.

[@ОрмонбекАкматов]

Изображения в видеороликах Получаются расплывчатыми, а Так ролик хороший и познавательный. Комментарии сделали - бы на русском языке.

[@joshoconnor9666]

Wonder how the phalanx would have done if the first row was instead heavy sheild and sword.

[@abiyasa9839]

Do rashidun vs sassanid/byzantine !

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

Great idea

[@abiyasa9839]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI you can do it whenever you want

[@cristianmcmerty]

Telling you today you tell truth that history

[@Ghost-vi8qm]

Why weren't they able to field such massive armies in the middle ages?

[@Cleeon]

More and more people have war weariness, fear, and have no quality as soldiers. The rich, is not very rich to pay, and the poor is very different with ancient people, at ancient time, poor is not always weak, in fact most of them stronger and have more savage, at middle age, most of the poor is weak. It's about the condition and how they taught since they was kid. Many ancient religion taught them about bravery, the punishment for enemies, and the glory to heaven promised by war, and at middle age, as you know the peaceful religion is the majority

[@RomanumChristum]

Generally it was simply because there were far far more nations with little people per nation, thus they couldn’t. That and the culture and societal organization was differant

[@markthompson9870]

Poor old Will... he always gets it

[@craterus-ii9im]

philip the 5th of macedon troops fought on the roman side in this one. So he could relieve war debt to rome after cyno. Great video thou .

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

It's not the same Philip in this battle

[@craterus-ii9im]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI wiki got this wrong go to brittana. the macedonians fought on the roman side in this one -(pretty sure)

[@craterus-ii9im]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI I Think they said antiocus used a macedon style phalanx. but the macedonians fought for the romans confusing. o phil the 5th was pissed at at ant the great because of not helping him against the romans at cyno. pay backs are hell. IF they would have teamed up the romans would have maybe lost.

[@RomanumChristum]

@@craterus-ii9imSeleucud used a Macedonian phalanx, as did Egypt and the other diadochi. Let’s not forget they were all Greeks themselves

[@craterus-ii9im]

@@RomanumChristum You have words of wisdom. My statement was contrary to the video voice mistake in saying the macedonians of phil 5 fighting against the romans

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

La Falange tenía que haber sido como mínimo de 22.000Hombres. el inconveniente de esta infantería pesada. Que era efectiva en terreno llano. Pero si el terreno estaba accidentado. Se perdía la cesión de sus tropas y se rompía la fila.

[@the5thmusketeer215]

Pay Peanuts??? 🥜🥜🥜 🤔 Get… Jittery Elephants! 🐘🐘🐘💨💨

[@joanjordamateu9417]

Historically and graphically educational, but in terms of the number of men it is NO REALISTIC simulation . In the Total War of academy assembly game sou wiill have a reduction factor of 1:6. In other words, where it says that there were 30,000 men in the Roman side, but in the simulation you can barely deploy 5,000 men

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

There are more than 20,000 men in this simulation.

[@Toklat]

To Mario duva:Ever Heard of Scipio Africanuc?????

[@BillakosRS]

the result would be better for Antiochus if he DIDN'T used Chariots & Elephants, but maybe elephants as reserves would be great for him because if either left or right wing collapsed, the elephants should probably stop the Romans to flank Antiochu's forces...

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

I would also say so

[@BillakosRS]

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI thanks for replying bro, keep up the good work and i wait for more battles :D

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Tres Líneas. Primero los Hastatis. Segundo. Los Príncipes. Y Tercero los veteranos Triarios.

[@theJosephkarim]

👍👍👍

[@Ruben5939]

El titulo correcto seria Roma vs Atenas o en su defecto Romanos vs Griegos

[@gwentackoen653]

all this kind of reconstructions have no "real" base , we only think it must have been like that ...

[@RecepGültekinMalatya44]

❤❤

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Las Legiones tenían mucha más movilidad. Y podían pelear en cualquier terreno.

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Los Celtas de Las Islas Británicas. Utilizaban carros en sus batallas. Aparte de caballería e infantería. En Europa. Se había dejado de utilizar los carros en la Guerra. Eran poco prácticos. Tropezaban con piedras y volcaban.

[@николайкуликовский-и3к]

Получается что самый ощутимый урон, грекам, нанесли - их же собственные колесницы и боевые слоны.

[@dereksoyousayyournameis]

Takes me from what i love to do

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Por rse motivo dejaron de usarse Elefantes. Una vez heridos arremetian contra sus propias Lineas. Siempre habia un hombre en ellos con un martillo y un escoplo. Estos cuando veian que el Elefante daba la vuelta. Dava un golpe y el Paquidermo caia fulminado.

[@Rohit-tp7qx]

The selucids lost cause of their war elephant and chariots and they didn't deploy a skirmishes screen infront of their phalanx like phyruss , elephants would have been better on the flanks rear skirmishing then later on charing to frighten roman horses

[@Steven-jn2cw]

I agree. I think the Seleucids actually could have won this battle with different tactics and formation

[@Rohit-tp7qx]

This was a poor show of combined arms phalanax only works with combined arms chariots are good against cav but don't commit for the initial charge if you skirmishes

[@mohamed-fb9vt]

That's not Scipio asiaticus It's mariuse

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Quería decir Biga. Carro con dos caballos.

[@timothyhannon605]

Fire at will? Fire what?????

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Era su punto devil. Y por detras.

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Después con Cayó Julio César. Las Legiones fueron casi invencibles. La X. Legión. Pasó a la Historia por una gran proeza. Ella sola. Detuvo aún Ejército. Helvecio. De más de 60.000Hombres. durante unas semanas construyeron defensas. Estás aguantaron. Al enemigo.

[@tempest7341]

Os elefantes são umas💩no campo de batalha pois se assustam facilmente

[@AdituLaudisMMXXI]

And hard to control

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Sobre 40.000 hombres Romanos y Aliados.

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Los escaramuzadores. Infantería Ligera. Con jabalinas. Los Honderos con piedras. O con bolas de plomo. Mataban a los caballos de los carros.

[@剛志宮地]

this battle for a change of historic there so turnover as it age.

[@cortobrown7919]

This is how you destroy an empire.

[@Blackpanter1123]

Seluco, the worst general, imagine if Alexander or Napoleon were commanding the Seleucid army, he would win that battle.

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Los Griegos. Sobre 80.000 Hombres

[@andreassavvidov4908]

GRECCE vs GREECE

[@salvadorcerezojimenez1417]

Los Catrafactos. Caballería acorazada. Marchaban al trote. Dado su peso del jinete y del caballo. No podían cargar.

[@ericathenos6362]

gg cool

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Romans > Hellenes

[@wankawanka3053]

😂😂😂😂