15.6.1 Packet Tracer - Configure IPv4 and IPv6 Static and Default Routes

[@mrd4233]

I really appreciate your videos! I always learning something new when I get stuck in the labs!

[@romeroc24]

Thank you for all your support, Glad to help you

[@NocturaFanMarkW]

Another excellent video, and very well explained. Thank you!

[@romeroc24]

Thank you for all your support, I appreciate it

[@CompSciMajor1]

Thanks once again Christian. I really wish CIsco or my university would correct these errors. Makes it very confusing for students like me.

[@romeroc24]

Thank you my friend! I appreciate it

[@luxthegoat3132]

Thank you for confirming there is an error on the final step. Cisco should be more careful when wording these questions.

[@romeroc24]

Thank you for all your support my friend

[@diogoazenha1823]

in part 5 in step 2 why did you put /128?

[@romeroc24]

because only one host will use a prefix 128, a subnet is a group that will use a subnet of 64

[@ijl1mae408]

thank you for all your good video thank you!!!!

[@romeroc24]

Glad you like them! Thank you my friend

[@damasta.md.99]

Hi Christian. After performing the configuration (100%) and shutting down the int s0/0/0 (on ER or ISP1) in order to perform the verification as you did @ 17:50, the IPv4 ping from the PC-A/PC-B towards the server fail, whereas the IPv6 pings succeed. I'd like to inform that I have configured the next hop IPs using the real interface IP addresses instead of the interfaces (as performed by you). Thus could this be the fault of pings not reaching to the SRV via the floating static IP? P.S. I have also added the "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0/0/1 5" as in your vid to ER, currently having the routing table indicating: "S* 0.0.0.0/0 [5/0] via 10.10.10.5 is directly connected, Serial0/0/1", but the IPv4 pings still fail. Also have restarted the PT just in case, though with no change. If you have any ideas on where to check further, I'd be really grateful! Thank you in advance!

[@romeroc24]

Static routes are configured round trip, so you need to verify that you need a floating static route from Edge to ISP2 but also a static route from ISP2 to Edge, the problem is there is still a static route that is trying to go from ISP1 to Edge (down link) and should prefer the route from ISP2 to Edge

[@damasta.md.99]

@@romeroc24 Hi again Christian, I've redone from scratch the PT according to the one performed by you and compared the output on my version vs yours. While configuring the floating IPs on return from ISP1 to ISP2 I've mistaken the incoming w/ the outgoing IPs (i.e: ip route 192.168.10.16 255.255.255.240 10.10.10.5 5 instead of ip route 192.168.10.16 255.255.255.240 198.0.0.2 5). My questions are still: 1. Strangely how PT has count 100% even w. the incorrect IP config of the interface? 2. After the proper modifications, I have selected simulation mode to check the path of the ICMP from PC-A/PC-B towards the SRV and back. I don't understand one thing: the ping from the hosts reaches the SRV, but while returning back through the SW (ISP_LAN), the SW always forwards the ICMP reply just to ISP1. Can you please explain why the ICMP RE always goes from the SW to ISP1 and never to ISP2?

[@romeroc24]

@@damasta.md.99 The problem is the Customer User Server, it can be configured with only one default gateway, there is no possibility to create a second backup gateway, only on real lab or GNS3

[@domenicocardilli5224]

Very well explained, thank you!

[@romeroc24]

You're very welcome!

[@nikolasioakimidis3003]

I dont get why at 19:19 the subnet mask 255.255.255.255(/32) and 255.255.255.240(/24). Which is the server's mask? Great video by the way, thanks!

[@romeroc24]

255.255.255.255(/32) means to point only one host, not the subnet, not the group, so you can point and create the route to only one host

[@entisarabdulkadir2525]

I got an error message when I put the default static (ip route 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 s0/0/0) the mark indicating the first zero as an error. Please need help

[@romeroc24]

0.0.0.0 space 0.0.0.0

[@mohanadalsuqairi1082]

Very useful . Thanks brother

[@romeroc24]

thank you for all your support

[@Emll_117]

Thank you, my master

[@romeroc24]

I appreciate

[@ronschenk8002]

I subbed, thanks.

[@romeroc24]

I appreciate it, thank you

[@josecarlosnina6979]

Excelente video

[@romeroc24]

gracias, lo aprecio

[@therealmanix188]

@@romeroc24 Un pequeño problema bro, al momento de poner el ip router 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 s0/0/0 y darle enter me dice " invalid input detected at '^' marker. "

[@romeroc24]

@@therealmanix188 hay espacio en medio

[@therealmanix188]

@@romeroc24 En dónde exactamente?

[@romeroc24]

@@therealmanix188 Debes de establecer el video en calidad 720p por lo menos para que puedas ver bien los comandos

[@prasannasiriwardana7703]

Thank you..

[@romeroc24]

You're welcome

[@prasannadevapriya7238]

helpful..thank you

[@romeroc24]

Thank you for all your support my friend!

[@roshanshrestha4665]

Is it correct to always use ip address instead of interface name?

[@romeroc24]

better if you will prefer to use next hos ip address rather than local interface

[@pozu5542]

15 advertisement for 27 minutes video....

[@romeroc24]

I will try to configure a better way for the advertisements

[@ALANNOEVALENZUELANUEZ]

hermano puedes hablar en español porfi? UwU, dislike por no hablar español, gracias. UnU

[@romeroc24]

trataré de hacer más videos en español