you have to compare whether overbet river is more ev or betting smaller. you can't just say i want to overbet now becos i want to represent air or nuts... thats not logical becos what you want to represent is not the same as your range
@table_tennis_fever3 ай бұрын
lol that's why i'll never play no limit as a pro. luck plays too much factor when u got people betting/ checking for no good reasons. They don't care about math or making sense, just do whatever they want. I'ts hard to be always in tune with all the play styles in the world while calculating all these odds of different styles. The margin of error often is bigger than even the luck of the game that day. Play it as a game that's all u can do
@BBshark0003 ай бұрын
I disagree with your analysis. The sole reason you play as close to GTO or solvers as possible is to make sure that you have a higher EV than your opponent(s) - that you would win out over a long term. This is significantly lowered when you play higher stakes, especially when you have poor bankroll management. If you play at a stake where you only have 2 buy-ins, this would turn the game from Maths to luck very quickly, because variance takes precedence over strategy.
@tesla_myth_bust3 ай бұрын
@@BBshark000 i totally agree with what u said, i said "that day" in the summary sentence "The margin of error often is bigger than even the luck of the game that day". Obviously if you play a long term (how long tho, sometimes can be weeks) and your skills are better, u'd win more, but many people don't have that kind of time to wait for the universe to even out the luck, and it's surely not fun while you are on the downswing of luck. Doing this as a job is one of the worst.