Rose Roes, talks about Non Duality, November 10 - 2023

#nonduality #advaita #satsang
Every Friday 19.00-20.30 ( Amsterdam time)
You are welcome to join.
December 1-3 , live meeting in Folsom, California, USA
All details on : www.rosemarijnroes.nl

[@juliakrokes5624]

♥

[@Dsdafg]

16:03 Nice!

[@julialorenarudys4658]

Ohhhh,❤ really thank you!!!❤

[@mariaclemente2930]

There is nothing wrong and nothing right, the point is that there is no one, if there is no one, there is no character and there is no story, we can intuit it even if we do not understand it, we simply like the message

[@karlskaret275]

If there is no one, who is"we" that can intuit it? And the "we" that like the message? There is no me, but there is we. That kind of makes sense, as in no individual self, but One Divine Self. We. Rose says stuff like....when "we" are caught up with being a "me".... Acknowledging a Self and denying Self in the same sentence. It's quite the contradiction. I really don't think this would be talked about if no one cares about anyone.

[@jamehs33]

This just can't be understood by the mind. It was seen there was nobody for a couple of months but then there is still body identification here. A trip to the dentist for tooth removal and subsequent pain was experienced as mine and there was suffering.

[@karlskaret275]

Rose, who or what is the apparent Rose talking to?

[@nane272]

It has already been said - There is only/just speaking

[@karlskaret275]

@hans-jorgtschani9769 I know she says that. But the question remains. Notice how talking is happening in the form of questions and answers between people. Or apparent people. Notice how animated Rose is explaining that nothing matters. Like it matters... All the contradiction seems like a clue about "the message"

[@ciimoon5661]

I am struggling to understand this. How can there be no you if God created you?

[@EPE77]

Dio....chi?

[@rosemarijnroes]

Hi, there can be a belief that God created you, here that is lost. So saying there is no you is not a belief, there is just not seeing a 'you'.

[@karlskaret275]

​@rosemarijnroes so if it isn't rose "not seeing a you"? Is it "here" not seeing a you?

[@payt01]

One way of seeing it is that the river created a whirlpool. You can point at it and it seems to be an entity unto itself, yet it is nothing but the river/water which doesn''t exist by itself :) Not sure if Rosemarijn agrees with that point of view, but that's how I imagine it.