the Full story of my experience with Rotec Radial engines, more about the planes on the Facebook page " repliques volantes de la grande guerre"
Пікірлер: 745
@Encom04 жыл бұрын
Being an engineer and having watched a couple of videos on these engines, it seems you guys put a lot of faith (and your life) in the hands of a manufacturer who I wouldn’t trust to power my lawnmower.
@divyajnana5 жыл бұрын
What an eye opener and shame on Rotec Radials. Sorry about your aircraft losses. Thank God you survived.
@tomwatkins47304 жыл бұрын
Thank you for exposing the fraudulent claims & manufacturing practices of Rotec. May their business die before their engine failures lead to death for pilots unaware of their defective parts & workmanship.
@blancolirio4 жыл бұрын
Some pretty damning evidence you have there. Thanks for posting!!
@fredcoleman25983 жыл бұрын
0
@catey625 жыл бұрын
As an Australian I apologise for all the troubles you've had and I am ashamed that a company from here has treated you so badly and provided you with such terrible quality (and unsafe ) engines for your aircraft and has treated you so badly. I hope they get shut down so that no one else has to deal with the kind of problems you and so many others have had to endure.
@victorsteerup31114 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the Warning, "defects in material and workmanship". I am a big round engine fan, but will never use one of these.
@dand5794 жыл бұрын
What a shit engine and company. I will definitely steer clear. Thanks for posting!
@alanroe10205 жыл бұрын
Hi there! I just watched your clip about Rotec engine failures. In February this year, the Rotec engine in my Murphy Rebel suddenly seized in mid flight over Tiger Country in Australia. I was lucky to be able to stretch the glide to a swampy clearing to put the aircraft down. It flipped inverted on roll out, but my wife and I were unharmed. The Rotec engine had had three incidents ( including two emergency landings) in the last fifty hours and had previously been sent back to the manufacturers for inspection and repair. It was returned without any explanation for what had been done to it. When the insurance company required my aero technician to inspect the seized engine, he tried to put fresh oil in and start it. It would not start and when he drained the fresh oil out it was full of metal fragments... I was interested to learn that I was not the only person to experience these types of problems. I would be happy to send you a pic of my lovely aircraft to include with the others at the end of your clip. Perhaps fortunately my Rotec engine was damaged beyond repair in our roll-over, so like you I am replacing it with a more sensible Lycoming 320 Happy and safe flying! I love your aircraft
@thierryroussel15 жыл бұрын
thanks for sharing , when I did put the first video about my first engine failure the only thing Rotec could do , was to make a video to insult me saying that I am a liar, that is why no I made this video with all my problems, at least next time Rotec will not be able to say to someone it his fault and it works perfectly with everybody else .........I wonder if there is anyone in the world with more than 300 hrs and no problem ?????
@Paladin18734 жыл бұрын
ROTEC -the blunder from down under.
@michaelrepas24864 жыл бұрын
I was going to buy one, but not now. Thanks you probably saved both my plane and me
@ChristianRB894 жыл бұрын
You could take a look at the Verner Scarlet radials instead.
@ConvairDart1063 жыл бұрын
Same here. Am looking to replace my Rotax 503, which has never given me any trouble, except with regulators, and charging coil.
@bradleypark19365 жыл бұрын
I am Australian and I am utterly ashamed that this dodgy, deadly engine has caused so much heartache and danger for it's unfortunate owners. Absolutely disgraceful and un-Australian. People's lives and livelihood are at stake here.
@jimnickles23475 жыл бұрын
YEAH! I couldn't BELIEVE these are Made in Australia, you guys Build GOOD Shit. Who IS this Clown? He can't be Strine! Thierry, hope you been going to Church regular since all this, the Maker is Watching Over you, lol.
@bollockszz5 жыл бұрын
me too...disgusting.
@graemewilliams13085 жыл бұрын
Well we could get A Current Affair onto it but she's only interested in exposing love rats, shonky car blokes, and shit canning alpha males in general.
@markmark52695 жыл бұрын
Graeme, you quite clearly haven't met the owner.
@graemewilliams13085 жыл бұрын
Negative on that.
@rogersmith90864 жыл бұрын
If that is the quality of Rotec engines they should be banned for use in aviation. End of story.
@charlesharper72924 жыл бұрын
These are experimental aircraft and can run a variety of engines including automotive conversions some of which are quite good. Ya pays your money and takes your chances. Just try and not kill anyone...
@billycaspersghost75284 жыл бұрын
The Rotec engine is not some converted VW engine ,home built. It is an expensive engine and is sold to a quality standard. If something as basic as a push rod is failing there is something seriously wrong. If Rotec failed to discover the same thing on a failed engine, sent back to them for inspection after an incident caused by their engines failure, that is beyond belief. They clearly did not strip that engine even though they charged for it and in the context of a potentially lethal accident are criminally negligent. Not to mention fucking stupid from a business point of view.They think this stuff doesn`t get out?
@rogersmith90864 жыл бұрын
@@billycaspersghost7528 thanks Billy. Right on. Rotec need to wake up and take a more professional approach instead of worrying about the financial loss of having to fix a dud engine at their expense. If Rotec don't change it will be the end of the company.
@billycaspersghost75284 жыл бұрын
This stuff makes me so mad. Living in a nation (UK) who`s once great companies committed industrial suicide by similar attitudes I find it baffling how it can happen on any scale.Engines failing cars rusting away then having to battle with manufacturer/retailer over it . Like they are doing me a favour. I find it hard to understand anyone getting nostalgic about old British motorcycles having owned a 1971 BSA Lightning back in the day. Presumably something made them want to make things so why make poor quality things. But with this... we are not talking about a car stranded at the side of the road ,aircraft do not coast safely to the kerb. I agree with your last line .Change or die . Or just stop before you kill someone .As they almost certainly will.
@deeremeyer17494 жыл бұрын
@@rogersmith9086 I've got a $100 bill that says that installation, cowling, airframe and firewall are preventing proper cooling airflow. The air has to FLOW SOMEWHERE AS QUICKLY AS IT COMES IN THE FRONT TO BE OF ANY USE COOLING. ALL OF THOSE DAMAGED PARTS ARE INDICATIVE OF OVERHEATING, OVEREXPANSION AND EVENTUALLY A LOSS OF ENGINE COMPRESSION AND/OR FUEL VAPORIZATION AND/OR VACUUM LEAKS. THAT INTAKE HOSE SHOWN AT FIRST DID NOT "BURST" WITHOUT MELTING FIRST AND IT WAS MORE LIKELY "IMPLODED" THAN "EXPLODED".
@GreggGermain3 жыл бұрын
I must commend you on your perseverance in rebuilding after crashes and then finding a good engine solution. A lot of people would have given up. Well Done!
@charlesfoster1415 жыл бұрын
Radial aircraft engines are the greatest marvel ever invented for aviation! Radial engines are beautiful to behold and their sound is breathtaking! I am 65 years old soon and have enjoyed being close to big Pratt & Whitney 450 and 600 radials not to mention Lycoming, Continental, Jacob (shaky jakes), Kenner and Warner Radial engines all my life! What could be more beautiful in looks and sound than a 450 Super Stearman! Those big Pratts vibrate the ground around you with their Thum-pa-da-de-thum-pa-da-de-thum-pa-da idle! Or maybe a Great Lakes Biplane powered by a 165 Warner Radial? And then let us not leave out the magnificent Bücker Bü 133C Jungmeister with it's marvelous Siemens Sh14A-4 radial engine. Have you ever seen these Jungmeister biplanes converted to a flat Lycoming 150 or 180? Looks and sounds like nothing by comparison. So I can easily see why this fellow was determined (yet ill advised) to continue with his Rotec radials. Designing, building and setting up an aircraft's engine mount for weight & balance then fitting a cowling not to mention the propellor, fuel and oil tanks, lines, fittings, valves, wiring, straps and clamps is no simple task. Making up one's mind to remove and completely re-engineer and remanufacture all this is mind blowing! That is why this took so long to undue and switch to a different powerplant. Anyone who has owned and worked on as many airplanes as I have knows this all too well. So everybody chill out before questioning this masterful builder's decisions and actions. He initially trusted Rotec but got taken. We should all take up a collection and send it to him with our heart felt condolences! Happy New Year everyone!
@rogerturner55044 жыл бұрын
Rotec should be closed down by the Australian Government. The potential to kill someone is in every flight with one of their engines.
@niner_six_echo3 жыл бұрын
Well, that does it for any interest in Rotec engines. Thanks for posting and I'm glad you survived the Rotec nightmare.
@robertborchert9324 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing so much of your experience here! The repeated airframe repair you've had to do shows you're a master craftsman, sir! On the other side if the coin, you've personally experienced what those early mechanics and aviators did in their time. You sir, are worthy of wearing a genuine silk scarf. Lovely birds you have there! My grandfather flew the Sopwith Pup in Holland, when they were state of the art.
@donaldparlettjr32955 жыл бұрын
I never was a Rotec fan and I think they owe you a bit of dosh for repairing 2 airplanes.
@Acrowat405 жыл бұрын
Erm maybe a bit of extra for trying to kill him you mean : )
@pb487115 жыл бұрын
Rotec needs to make this right and cover every dollar of damage cost incurred due to their shoddy engineering.
@davidparry85145 жыл бұрын
totally shoddy engineering, amazing a pc. of shit like that went out the door. could kill somebody...several times over.
@LeaMacDonald4 жыл бұрын
Rotec engines are now fully certified and guaranteed for continuous use as boat anchors.
@iknklst4 жыл бұрын
Buys used Rotec radial to use as boat anchor. Find out Rotecs are made of foam rubber.
@rodrigor.gobatto76944 жыл бұрын
Almost 2 years after this vide was postes, i came across it by chance. KZbin suggested it for me an I`m glad I´ve seen it. I just can´t believe how irresponsible Rotec is... And I´m amazed by your work! You just got a new fan!
@keithnoneya4 жыл бұрын
I've heard nothing good about Rotec engines unless you completely rebuild them and re-engineer some of the parts and them put it back together properly. Thanks for sharing. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya
@nzsaltflatsracer80546 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing all of this. Sorry to see how much time, money & heart ache this has cost you. Rotec's blatant lie's in showing your aircraft under a false name for their advertising purposes is adding more fuel to the fire. Hopefully more people get to see your experience before they commit to going down the same hole.
@gertnood4 жыл бұрын
"Friends don't let friends fly Rotec" - adapted from a Rotax slogan.
@Darrylx4444 жыл бұрын
The Rotax 912 series 4-strokes are very reliable. 80-100 HP, IIRC. I used to fly one in a plane I built across the Rocky Mountains, but I sold it years ago.
@gertnood4 жыл бұрын
@@Darrylx444 In fairness, the comment was directed towards two-stroke Rotaxes. They are also generally reliable engines if the owner treats them like an aircraft engine rather than a snowmobile or a chainsaw. There are often mitigating circumstances in an engine failure but they take the rap for it.
@christophermcnally87825 жыл бұрын
I bought an alternator conversion from them and the alternator had to be rebuilt before I used it. They gave me a belt for electric motors which lasted 10 hrs before breaking. I bought it at Oshkosh . They had a special on. When I got home I was overcharged 250 US dollars which I never got back. I was promised an electronic ignition conversion instead but never received anything and haven't heard back from them.
@twickersruss4 жыл бұрын
That must be soul destroying after all the work building those fine aircraft.
@ThatGuysProject4 жыл бұрын
I suspect he was just happy to be alive, those crashes looked brutal
@REDMAN2985 жыл бұрын
Those rotec mechanics wouldn`t pass the probationary period if they tried to hire on at an auto junk yard. Glad I don`t have anything rotec. After seeing this they should be shut down.
@892685 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing your story. I am very glad I watched this video.
@clayz14 жыл бұрын
The Rotec radial was the right engine concept for your wonderful planes. You sure gave the company more chance than they deserved, looking back. Great video!
@billykuan4 жыл бұрын
I just watched a video with a new Rotec engine that had bad oil pressure. The engine had used parts from other engine returns. Company sends warrantied part and charged shipping both ways from Australia. Not just one problem, many. Rotec is now made in China and financially stretched. I expect a certain standard of quality in aviation and Rotec doesn't have it. I wouldn't use their engines I do not trust their internal qualities.
@charlesharper72924 жыл бұрын
That's just bad business! Someone's gonna die. We need to make them understand. NO MORE MONEY! Till this is rectified.
@jnichols34 жыл бұрын
Just a matter of time before they go on sale at Harbor Freight.
@adamr92154 жыл бұрын
Joseph Nichols I don’t think Harbor Freight would allow junk like that in their stores.
@ethics34 жыл бұрын
@InfiniteMushroom Here he is criticizing another brand of engine. kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6KokqFsZ5xgY9k
@danatompkins58474 жыл бұрын
All certified aircraft motors use plated AN style bolts. I noticed in the photos their bolts and studs look like off the shelf true value hardware store coarse thread stuff. That speaks volumes about the way their company thinks. Don’t care if experimental, there should be an attempt to use proper engineering and build methods.
@orvjudd13834 жыл бұрын
Rotec just needs to go out of business. They are a danger to all airmen. Get the NTSB involved.
@pieterpretorius10144 жыл бұрын
a notam needs to be submitted to all aviation authorities to not certify these engines for flight ops in every country. rather go for Rotax or lycoming or continental motors. and rotac needs to be liquidated into oblivion for crappy engines that put peoples lives at risk
@michaelmayfield43044 жыл бұрын
I disagree, they need to stay in business and just make pencils - ones that aren't sharp.
@raydriver730010 ай бұрын
You guys are not only extremely talented engineers and pilots but also incredibly brave. Full marks 🌞
@gregdannels16995 жыл бұрын
Thank you for informing others about this.
@1brasov4 жыл бұрын
Only Rotec Radial Ive seen was at Alamosa Co on a very nice Zenith 701. It failed less than 100 hours total time and the 701 was totaled.
@shortribslongbow53125 жыл бұрын
Sorry to see the problems with Rotec Radials thought they were better than that. Glad you weren't hurt.
@slyfly862 ай бұрын
vous avez mis une énorme énergie dans votre avion! bravo pour toutes ces épreuves!
@AeroworksProductions5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing. Not too good for Rotec.
@ndenisi5 жыл бұрын
I admire your patience. Sorry for all the heartache. Keep on keeping on!
@LJDRVR5 жыл бұрын
Wow. You’re a brave aviator in the spirit of our finest. I think you’d have better luck with a LeRhone 80 horse rotary than that horrible, piece of junk, Rotec. Their QC doesn’t seem fit for a lawn mower company, and for them to not tear down a failed engine is simply criminal negligence. Thanks for sharing.
@SuperYellowsubmarin6 жыл бұрын
Merci d'avoir partagé cette histoire. Visiblement ils ont failli sur les 2 critères les plus importants pour un moteur d'avion : la fiabilité et le support client ...
@nunyabuizness29535 жыл бұрын
The biplane constructed at the start of the video is a beauty! I love that the structure is all metal.
@wal742225 жыл бұрын
The owners of Rotec should be criminally charged, and jailed with producing a lethal products, and the company bankrupted and shut down for good.
@charleebunch66375 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video , I was considering one if their engines , not now , God bless
@gertnood5 жыл бұрын
Lovely looking engines, shame they apparently aren't even close to being reliable enough for manned flight. After seeing this I wouldn't even sit in an aircraft equipped with one. Man that cost you a lot of time and money.
@Dazsvintagestuff5 жыл бұрын
I hope Rotec never sell another engine. Keep safe my friend.
@martinsaunders79253 жыл бұрын
For the best in backyard engine builders check out Allen Millyard. Not aviation engines,but his 5Litre vee twin using 2 Wright cylinders/ pistons is impressive
@gmcjetpilot5 жыл бұрын
Wow ! Where to start !!! My hat is off to you, great workmanship, great flying, great determination, I really admire your efforts. Thank God you are OK and wish many trouble free and happy safe flying with the Lycoming. You deserve it. NOTICE wheel axle flexing on landing. Don't know much about the design but suggest you consider a stronger axle. THANKS FOR THE VIDEO... As an EAA Kit Plane Builder the lessons you share apply to all of us.
@gregdannels16994 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing with us
@Paladin18734 жыл бұрын
ROTEC - the little engine that couldn't.
@oscarjonesxxx28934 жыл бұрын
NTSB should investigate these accidents - from the evidence presented here and at other places, these engines should not be allowed in the US. Nuff said.
@ditzydoo43784 жыл бұрын
Here-here, very much so. I have seen and heard of nothing but grief from these "Rotec" engines. How did they ever achieve an air worthiness certificate? Is this why they are made in Australia because of some obscure loop-hole that allows for the sale of defective engines without any FAA/NTSB certification? If this were built here in the US, I'm sure the NTSB would have closed their doors long ago.
@sblack483 жыл бұрын
They are not certified engines. They have no airworthiness certificate. They are for use in experimental airplanes only.
@sonshinelight5 жыл бұрын
Good choice and you walked away. Thank God for that. Glad you're ok.
@highway2run2 жыл бұрын
You have the patience of a saint !
@donaldasayers5 жыл бұрын
You could lift a car engine off any japanese production line and it would statistically be more reliable than the general aviation engines typified here. And if you threw them away at 1000 hours it would still be cheaper.
@daszieher5 жыл бұрын
that's not the point. this engine is even worse than the lycosaurs. however, having designed components for auto-engines, our design criteria were, maximum life time of 2000hrs, catastrophic failures are OK. the customer can stop at the side of the road. not so much when flying. that is why aero engines have to wear out before they fail.
@jiroyamamoto2878 Жыл бұрын
@@daszieher Maximum life time of 2000 hours? My car has 210,000 miles on it! The fastest it ever goes is 70 mph. I estimate it's current engine hours at 6000 hours. This is a Toyota, and hardly unusual.
@daszieher Жыл бұрын
@@jiroyamamoto2878 it doesn't break at 2k hrs. It's just calculated to reach 2k hrs.
@jiroyamamoto2878 Жыл бұрын
@@daszieher Is English your first language? Minimum life span of 2000 hours might be more understandable. By that do you mean all aspects of the engine, perhaps with the exception of a timing belt?
@daszieher Жыл бұрын
@@jiroyamamoto2878 no. "Minimum" is not the requirement. I used to design parts for engines. Literally: "Das muss nur 2.000 Stunden halten.", while "minimum" would have translated to "Das muss mindestens 2.000 Stunden halten." Over-engineering was a "fail". What makes the parts last longer are the safety factors and generally still conservative calculations. English, though not my first language, is my third (of six fluent) next to my native German and Spanish, followed by French, Flemish and Portuguese. My Italian is very rudimentary. Although I wouldn't list it, I will get by quite OK in Italy. How about your language skills? 😉
@LiquidAudio4 жыл бұрын
Fascinating video and as an Aussie I share the sentiments of other Aussies who’ve commented. Not good enough.
@majortom35233 жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks for posting that warning. I just saw they had engines "on sale - next 5 only" on the website. I hope they solved ALL those problems in the last year.
@beachcomber20084 жыл бұрын
A beautifully-made radial engine would beat the engine that replaced it. I admire your work tremendously.
@johnniess79143 жыл бұрын
Amazing channel
@peterdahlgrenbuildsthef86345 жыл бұрын
I sure appreciate this report and warning. I am getting ready to build the 28. I had no idea the rotax radials were so awfull. We had one for our sopwith camel build in Lawrenceville. Aviation school of maint. And it had a bad rocker as well. I think i will follow your lead here with the o 320. Thank you for this info. Greatly appreciated!!
@tomcoryell Жыл бұрын
Rotec and Rotax are not the same.
@Thomas..Anderson8 ай бұрын
@@tomcoryell One is from Australia and the other from Austria.
@tailwheelflier6 жыл бұрын
Glad I watched this video
@quinnjim5 жыл бұрын
Now I understand why Rotec gives a 10 year warranty on these. They wouldn't sell any without it. I prefer not to crash so....I'll stick with Lycoming.
@dogphlap67496 жыл бұрын
+thierryroussel1 I'm always amassed when I see this sort of thing. The most important thing about an aircraft engine is it should be reliable but these clowns seem to think the most important thing is to cheap out on both design (inadequate plastic gears in the distributor) and assembly (a push rod not even in the cup of the rocker, or did that fall out when the engine was running ?) plus a socket headed cylinder bolt that was either too long or had oil at the bottom of the blind hole in the crankcase so that it pushed metal proud of a machined face. The failure of the rubber induction tube coupling after such a short time of use seems really odd, were these made of some material that was not meant to be exposed to gasoline vapour ? Glad to see you survived these 'engine died' accidents, shame a couple of your aircraft did not. The Rotec installation looks more the part but I think you gave them enough chances, one more could have proved fatal. Thank you for the video, a cautionary tale if ever there was one.
@cr69255 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. And thierryroussel1 has taken it all in his stride. Qudos to the incredibly patient chap. The destruction of two aircraft and the expense of rebuilding them and surviving the forced landings all thanks to the one common denominator of failure. Rotec. Personally? Had this happened to me and I'd managed to live through it more or less intact, I'd be looking to bill or sue Rotec.
@charleebunch66375 жыл бұрын
Dogphlap no shit,u would think that they would have to be certified for air worthyness,God bless
@charlesharper72924 жыл бұрын
Dose Rotec not realize how serious this is to the aviation community, as well as their company's credibility and future?!
@stevemadak62554 жыл бұрын
I grew up with machinists around a machine shop(step dad owned one). There is no part of a factory Rotec engine I would trust. In fact if you must have one for the looks of it I would suggest buying one in parts and have a trusted machinist who builds engines put it together. Good machinists are like wizards. As they build the motor they can find its weaknesses and take steps to insure the best outcome. Your planes are wonderful!
@araildo37555 жыл бұрын
That so well done!
@bushflyersdownunder85654 жыл бұрын
out of interest do you have a link to the video rotec made about you that you mentioned?
@chrishorsten79805 жыл бұрын
Wow. You were brave to continue trusting Rotec. Sad that you couldn’t use a radial in the end.
@crissd82834 жыл бұрын
I can't believe you trusted the third engine. Even if rotac said it was new I would have completely torn that thing down and checked everything myself.
@ranchero505 жыл бұрын
I remember the earlier versions of this video. Man while I love the design I'd be pissed at the execution.
@endwood4 жыл бұрын
I feel sorry for you, they are junk engines I'd never get behind one of these POC!& I'm Australian!
@ufxpnv4 жыл бұрын
It seems the radial Rotec engine isn't a wise choice for aircraft by any stretch of the imagination.
@Fucomies5 жыл бұрын
You’re a brave man to keep putting those engines back in those planes.
@harrowtiger4 жыл бұрын
A few years ago Paul Chernikeef made a small 5 cylinder model Radial and showed it at Shepparton Victoria Australia Mammoth Model Plane Fly-in. As far as legend goes someone said “I want a bigger one for my Ultra Light”, and the rest is history. Model motor appeared to have the rocker boxes simply press fitted onto the cylinder heads, where both heads and rocker boxes were separate machined pieces, not cast en bloc parts.
@MegaGuitarpicker5 жыл бұрын
What a shame! You are quite the craftsman/artist. Building your own airplane and flying it must feel great! What an accomplishment! Rotec should be ashamed of their lack of ability to produce a dependable engine but apparently they are not because they keep sending you duds. You have great skills. Thank you for sharing this. I will show it to my friend who is waiting for his Rotec engine for a scale Mustang.
@bradbrinegar14194 жыл бұрын
After 2 engines and 2 planes its doubtful I would have gave them a 3rd chance. Glad to see you were ok. Could have been bad on the first crash.
@Maverick19442 жыл бұрын
Beautiful planes, i gotta ask as it's driving me nuts but what is the song you used in your sopwith pup video? Catchy as can be
@billwilliams36105 жыл бұрын
Glad your still alive! Did not know Rotec was producing such junk!
@lesizmor90795 жыл бұрын
It's not just their radial engines, and it's not just poor quality control/inspection. I bought an alternator conversion kit from them-- this was for a very popular Australian aircraft engine that has a weak stator/generator as standard equipment. Rotec includes a Honda/Kubota alternator in the kit-- well built & reliable. Rotec just designed and made the bracketing to piece it all together. Once installed it was immediately obvious that the belt pulley on the alt was not aligned with pulley on the crankshaft. About a 3/8" difference, enough to wear out or throw a belt in a few hours. A little extra machining brought them in line. So Rotec's simple bracket was BAD BY DESIGN. This sad Sopwith video shows me Rotec is incompetent beginning at the design table and continuing thru manufacture, assembly, inspection, and follow-up. CASA needs to take action.
@SKEptic-mg2dd4 жыл бұрын
Rotax ought to sue. What if someone built a shoddy sports car and called it a "Ferrare?"
@searchthetruth19815 жыл бұрын
Geez...you my man have angel patience...
@waterwarriors9114 жыл бұрын
As a machinist and metal worker in general, Rotec should be out of business!!!! Very serious shit here.
@marksharrock13395 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for documenting this nightmare. I will NEVER consider purchasing one of those junk Aussie engines.
@truckinphilosopher37755 жыл бұрын
After two such incidents, I would have got new engines from some where else! Pay attention Rotec! Fix your engine issues or go out of business! I think I would have sued them for what it cost to repair the aircraft.
@panther1055 жыл бұрын
Were most of these engine failures due to faulty assembly at the factory? Seems they have some serious quality control issues at Rotec
@searchthetruth19815 жыл бұрын
This is awesome!!!😃😃😃👍👍
@searchthetruth19815 жыл бұрын
Im just glad nobody got hurt or life treathened injured....
@johneastman19053 жыл бұрын
Mechanical and moral integrity both come down to levels of education and experience. The former is proper design, metallurgy, and manufacturing, tools and workmanship skills. The latter is a function of corporate goals and leadership, accountability and economics.
@johncartelli4 жыл бұрын
i guess the only thing "Safe" here is to say Rotec engines have not been engineered well enough to be an acceptable reliable aircraft engine..steer clear...
@danielledykgraaf64834 жыл бұрын
Hey just for the record....I am a HUGE radial fan... Love em...Turbines are whiney and smokey and noisey......Radials are Music..Like Bach to my ears. Fair winds and clear skies sir.
@gmcjetpilot4 жыл бұрын
I'm so happy you were not hurt and you have a Lycoming in your aircraft reliable power. I'm sorry for your financial loss and damage to your aircraft and time lost.
@TheTheotherfoot5 жыл бұрын
At a guess, Rotec is not your favorite company in the whole world. Right?? Seriously, you showed a lot more good will to Rotec than I would have, so sue the dickheads for a bucket load of cash, at least enough to pay for replacement power plants.
@thierryroussel15 жыл бұрын
suing is an american thing, here you never get a lot of money, but you have to pay expensive lawyers, flying in business from Europe to Australia many times , and Rotec , is not a big company it is just an assembly hangar full of other stuff in a small Australian airfield ......I have lost way too much money and time , but I am still alive , and now both of my planes are flying every weeks .....
@ToyManFlyer11005 жыл бұрын
@@thierryroussel1 .Well, you should pay some mercenarys to blow that POS plant to smitherings...and take the owner to a "Dark Site" for some attitude adjustements.....
@cluelessbeekeeping13224 жыл бұрын
@@ToyManFlyer1100 Hell ya! Best idea yet! This & the Gotha bomber idea.
@philipritson88214 жыл бұрын
How come CASA (the Australian FAA) went after Jabiru but left this manufacturer untouched?
@timothylindsey79254 жыл бұрын
A real eye opener! You may of saved my life ,i most definitely will nit go with a powerplant from them considering all the chances you gave them .Your lucky your alive, i wont take that chance.
@TheraPi3 жыл бұрын
I admire the bravery, for still trying a test flight after completely losing confidence in the engine :)
@Andy-pt1vx4 жыл бұрын
I can't believe you kept returning to rotec after the first incident.
@simpleman94416 жыл бұрын
Nice working
@tonystoakley58164 жыл бұрын
Ive been following all about these engines made in China says it all and and Aussie flogging them surprised no one yet been killed
@moises87954 жыл бұрын
So sorry you had to go through all this. I would never have the patience to rebuild an airplane
@michaelsimpson97795 жыл бұрын
Absolutely breathtaking......... shame on Rotec and the people responsible for this........
@Max50ww5 жыл бұрын
Glad you walked away from that Pup crash. That had the potential for a much worse outcome.....obviously!
@bwolfe25145 жыл бұрын
Frankly I find it astounding and almost unbelievable that you took parts from a failed engine to use in another failed engine for a TEST FLIGHT. Two wrongs don't make a right. They make dead pilots.
@alasdair41615 жыл бұрын
When you look at the level of meticulous engineering and cutting edge metallurgical skills that went into building the original radial's back in the day, it makes this copy look like a poor stage prop. The push rod probably disconnected when a valve stem nipped, holding the valve open momentarily, the piston contacts the valve and it belts it back with the assistance of the spring, the now floating pushrod punches a dent into the rocker (soft billet...!) and the shock load causes that tip failure of the pushrod. Just my guess from building race engines many years back. They probably sourced valves and guides designed for liquid cooled engines, and the higher temp of an air cooled head initiated the failure. The plastic gear would be an attempt to reduce cost over using precision ground, hardened alloy steel gears with fully profiled teeth. Shame on them..
@faainspector96995 жыл бұрын
Alasdair McC Bendix and slick both use plastic gears in their magnetos..........so what is your point?
@BeechComer5 жыл бұрын
Exactly! These metallurgy problems were all solved 90-some years ago! Why is this wheel having to be reinvented?
@UncleKennysPlace5 жыл бұрын
Could have also been over-revved.
@alasdair41615 жыл бұрын
FAA Inspector Point is, this example of straight cut gears showed clear early failure. Straight cut non involute tooth profile introduces parasitic vibration in the transfer of torque, that is why helix profiles are amongst other things, longer lasting. Why risk plastic for any reason that out qualifies reliability? Dont bendix use resin impregnated fibre gears?
@Sybok512885 жыл бұрын
@@alasdair4161 huh maybe they are resin, dont know myself but I remember in A&P -american airplane mechanic - school being surprised when i opened the mag, both brands, the first time and the gears felt like cheap plastic lol, i doubt it is cost saving since there is no such thing in aviation (when it's all done legally lolol) - maybe some sort of static charge or friction purpose for not using metal