Roulette House Edge Debunked!

[@rickkern5785]

The simple answer is you must bet more when you win than when you lose. The problem is implementing that. Awesome explanation by the way, I love the analogy to taxes on business.

[@HENSLEYDMB]

You can beat Roulette, you just can't bet every spin. The red/black strategy does work if you know when to start betting and when to stop chasing losses! A standard martingale system does not work long term with Roulette, you will lose big time.

[@GaryLuKOTH]

That does not beat Roulette. In fact, any strategy would lose in the long run. Stop betting just prevents the long run from happening.

[@tube1062]

@@GaryLuKOTH So the plan should be to beat the casino in the short run. Since you never know when a winning streak will occur, your only option would be to put the money you intend to spend in your right pocket before walking into the casino. Your winnings will go into the left pocket (cannot be used to play with). You leave once the right pocket is empty....

[@Fred-rg5vw]

The problem with your argument is that you state it's a random game ..unlike all the other examples you gave. There no such thing as clever roulette play..

[@knele_mandele]

Martingale system works only if you have a stock pile of cash.

[@ElAreira83]

I only play outside bets at french Roulette because of la partage rule which dicreases the house edge to 1,35% so with a good mm and proper strategy with selfmade rules you always follow roulette can be profitable in the long run. Your biggest enemy is your emotions. That you have to keep under control. I think this is the the most difficult thing!

[@weecarson4570]

Still 2.7% house edge, u got 48.65, casino 51.35%

[@Learner5555]

Agreed do you play dozens too??

[@donjour69]

@@weecarson4570 0 (la partage) takes half ur even chance bet. So It's not 19/37 losing outcomes against the player; the house has 18.5/37 or rather 48.65% + 1.35%

[@The_Life_of_KingT]

The wheel is random, and I do believe that it's fixed in some cases. If you want consistency in wins learn some systems and be as random as the ball.. You can hit playing the same numbers but not every spin.. Rotate some good systems with progression and you'll win more.. But no matter how much you win, if you don't know when to walk it all means nothing.

[@CodeMonkey66]

There is another advantage at a roulette table that I don't see mentioned here. It's not just the house advantage of 2.7%, but you must also include the table bet limits. Most live casino tables often have a minimum bet of $5 and often a max (outside) bet of something like $2500. Add whatever progression system you want...you must, if you're willing to risk alot of money, hit your bet within 9 spins or you'll lose $2555.

[@RouletteMan]

Good point! Without the table limits, a player with huge bankroll playing the Martingale strategy would win over 99% of the time.

[@MoltenMouseMetal]

Martingale works until it doesn't, and when it doesn't, it REALLY doesn't XD Best way to win big with it with less probability of a loss (although the loss will be massive) is to start with a huge bankroll, play on a very high-limit table, and only play a couple spins before walking away with your winnings, then don't come back.

[@tube1062]

@@MoltenMouseMetal Progression systems that don't take advantage out of winning streaks, are doomed to fail (mathematically, winning streaks will occur as often as losing ones ).

[@yuchubeluvstabanmeh7213]

@@RouletteMan leave and go to a higher table, you’ll win eventually

[@RealmsOfThePossible]

@@tube1062 I was told by a supposed Las Vegas veteran that you can never ever win at roulette but I pointed out to him your exact point..the law of averages and the universe hating imbalance a hot streak will happen just as often as a bank roll destroying walk away. It is all about timing and pretty much blind luck. The secret is stay disciplined, dip in and out and don't get greedy.

[@DavidvanDeijk]

The problem is in the limits of either the bankroll of the player or the house bet limits. People think getting ten times the same colour is nearly impossible but it happens on average twice every 1000 spins. And nearly all tables have a limit that is high enough to allow ten doublings from the minimum bet.

[@GaryLuKOTH]

Another one of the problems is the house advantage. If you have the advantage, then you should be able to win if you can play for as long as possible, whether you have unlimited bankroll or not. And the person in this video is wrong. Mathematics (most specifically, linearity of expectation) proves that there is no system that wins in the long run.

[@ianoian1]

Let me tell you something. I've played roulette on and off for years. Now, and this can only happen at a real 'High Street' casino where there is no upward limit on your betting, by using the Martingale system you shall NEVER lose. But a warning NEVER use the Martingale system on typical Internet casinos - they all have an upper betting limit!

[@LAXOFICIALsetyoursoulfree]

You also need a big pile of cash to put this method in practise

[@sambarnett3202]

@@LAXOFICIALsetyoursoulfree the more money you put in play the higher the tax you pay... That's literally all that changes on average. If you want an advantage you're either gonna need to cheat or play poker. Even blackjack will guarantee you losses in the long run unless the casino you play at is ran by people who enjoy losing money by using 1-4 decks, in such a game you could count cards and be just barely profitable, but you'd still go on huge downswings and your money could probably make more elsewhere. There is no good reason to spin a roulette wheel when the aim is to gain money. This channel makes me laugh personally, because there's a fair bit of content here based on absolutely idiotic principles, 20k people clicked subscribe so must actually buy into this absolute horse shit. If I was uploading stuff like this at this guys age, I'd hope my family would check me into a nut house... Pure bullshit from this dude. Listen to the math guys please. The fact he even has the nerve to put the equations in the video that educate you that he is indeed wrong about everything he's saying.... Just beyond me.

[@frankt9156]

Now think about it. Why would ‘High Street’ casino allowed people to do this, to “NEVER” lose? Since you never lose. I assume you are a millionaire by now?

[@manuel1232324]

the biggest advantage which makes the bank win the most from my view as a mathematician is the max bet problem. making us reach a point where we cannot keep the raising ratio we calculated for a positive outcome. leading to a limited amount of tries before hitting max bet amount which is way less than the calculated minimum tries it would neet for an almost 100% win... That is mathematically seen the real problem why its tough to win at roulett

[@Jason-gt2kx]

It is possible to win. The main strategy is to quit while you are up. The house advantage is real, and over the long run they DO have the advantage. Look for a strategy that has a winning probability closest to 50%. Always do the math before you believe in any system.

[@RouletteMan]

Agreed!

[@Learner5555]

Yessss...

[@adriatiklaci7569]

You can only use the probability’s in your favor if you’re disciplined enough to play the waiting game and not bet at every spin and most importantly not get fixated on a number or an area of the lay out table. Hedging is paramount.

[@PaulReinhard]

finally someone is using their brain

[@goldenbanjo197]

So random number numbers not pre determined numbers?

[@Antonio30448]

Well there is a guy in the 90s who went to a casino and turned his 4000$ to 4 million in 5 days playing roullete, he played untill the roullete had no more money,,, he never talked about how he did it and expert could not find a pattern but if 1 person can do it than its possible

[@okiefreemen]

title says debunked but instead video spends 15 mins confirming the house edge of roulette

[@manuel1232324]

And not even understanding what the real house advantage is in roulette. the biggest advantage which makes the bank win the most seen as a MATHEMATICIAN btw is the max bet problem. making us reach a point where we cannot keep the raising ratio we calculated for a positive outcome. leading to a limited amount of tries before hitting max bet amount which is way less than the calculated minimum tries it would neet for an almost 100% win... That is mathematically seen the real problem why its tough to win at roulette

[@a.j.conway1442]

The system that would win with your proposal is literally betting every single number

[@warrenali8151]

The variance not only loses you money but can also win you money. The house edge is why casinos still exist. When you are talking 1000's of spins every day, which the casinos do play, the expected 2.7% is realised as they do play millions of spins.

[@gimmethunder]

Nobody says you can't win playing roulette. The mathematical argument (and sorry to say, but it is valid and true), is that there cannot be a system in place in which you can guarantee you will win. It will always be a gamble. There are obviously things you can do to increase or decrease the chances of winning, but there is no bet you can place on the roulette table that is guaranteed to provide you a positive yield after the number is decided.

[@tookymax]

You are totally correct. The variance is what gets us. If we get lucky it at the start of our trip, we keep playing until the variance inevitably goes against us. That's when we tend to increase our bets and voila, we walk out losers. Good video!

[@tommyfu9271]

no the house edge is what gets you.if they paid 39 to 1 for hitting a number and left the wheel the same as it is now there would still be a ton of variance but in the long run you would win.

[@gamblor7151]

You spend 15 minutes alluding to "betting progression" tactics without ever once mentioning what they are. This is akin to some old soak down the casino writing down numbers and "studying the wheel", convinced that they can get an edge over the casino. Unless you can find a crooked wheel or a crooked croupier, you will NOT win long-term on roulette, and all the highly-polished videos in the world won't change that fact.

[@RouletteMan]

Explaining the logic and use of betting progressions would sidetrack the point of this video. But you have a point.

[@jasonalpinevillage]

You mean to say that it is not logical to gamble

[@ScarletDeathweaverLegacy]

10:49 With $1000 in that case; bet $500 on an even money bet (like red) and $500 on its opposite bet (black) each spin! You'd never lose a single spin and always win the bonus! EV = 1. 100 spin bonus / session with 0% risk of ruin.

[@caciocavalloster]

Did you forget about the zero’s……

[@JizzaGaming54]

U can’t profit from this and if it lands on green you lose 1000 so good luck buddy

[@Dananggolfpro]

Good video, I play in Melbourne and have a small system that on avg returns bet 20 & 80 chips per session for a 20 chip exposure. Some sessions last 10 min if I hit my win limit, and sometimes its an hour. Once I hit my win limit, I leave. Simple I've studied roulette for over 20 years, and there is no doubt that there is a sort of 'sequence" that often occurs when certain numbers show. Be humble, take profits, don't be greedy and have set limits both on the plus and minus side,

[@davidclair5982]

Hi, I like your post. So much rubbish is talked about roulette by people who do not understand it. I make a regular income from playing, using several methods, depending on how the numbers are appearing. Most people do not understand that it's not about the wheel. It's about the number sequence that is generated by the wheel. Cheers

[@giltrujillo36]

I agree with you I set an hour play time. Most time it's me and dealer. 85% of time I'm up 65-85$. But I truly believe a lot can be said, with the mechanics of the dealer and the wheel.... This is were my study is now...

[@lancesingleton3700]

You definitely know what your talking thats been my experience with roulette as well

[@UltimateTexasHoldemGuru]

Every number is RANDOM. There are no patterns so playing roulette for years means nothing

[@somerpg]

Actually there are just 3 factors that can make or break your gamble. I've been playing the American version for over a decade at many casinos. It all comes down to these 3 factors. Your play, the odds (duh!?), and the person spinning the ball around the wheel. That's it. Want to know if I'm serious. Win too much and see how fast they switch the dealer out for someone else. 9 times out of 10 your so-called luck will be over. The casinos knows the dealer's play a part in the whole game. Some dealers are more consistent, while some are all over the board. If you can find a great consistent dealer you've solved most of the failings of roulette.

[@RealmsOfThePossible]

It is quite crazy that no one really factors in the dealer. You can look at each one as a type of signature involving speed of the flick and position of the wheel. I know dealers that always flick when a certain number is at a certain point on the wheel, some use their lucky number and some just go random to get it choppy. This will upset the rhythm of the game and the hot numbers will drift. Get to know the dealers technique and you are a little bit closer to nailing the win.

[@brianlevesque6906]

🤣

[@thisismylife-i5t]

We loose, because it is a closed system. If you put 1 unit to red and 1 unit to 0 you get even if red comes, loose 2 if black comes and win 35 if 0 comes. So, if you spin the wheel for 35 times you would loose 1/3x2 because the ball hit the blacks. The variance just gives you a possibility to win sometimes. If you are so lucky to get 0 at first round, you win 35 units if you stop there. But on the long run, this won't happen. You could have rounds you get O last spin and all 35 spins that ends to black. Then you would loose 35x2,because you don't win anything, you loose your 1 unit on 0 and 1 unit on red 35 times. That's the basics of all closed systems, mind you trade is a closed system. If you can't sell anything, maybe you can borrow money and pay it back when you start earning again. That's why central banks release more money to market ( and same time weaken the money value, because it's a closed system and there's more money on the market ). So, if you have a large bankroll, you can "borrow" money your bankroll if you hit the bottom, but because you can't "release" any money, you are still in the same system. Only way you can win is martingale, but you know how that usually ends. Other way is to steal as Einstein said. This is the real reason why some people are rich and some are poor and some steal and that we need social security to prevent the stealing. The poor people don't know how to use different kinds of systems to make more money. They don't understand the concept of interest. This could be the real way to gain money from roulette, if something is. Let's say you reverse martingale with 1 dollar. 5 times red comes 32, if you flatbet it's only 5 or you loose that's -5. If you are fearless, try that. Mind you you also loose if you loose on spin 4. If you end up winning, the winnings should go to some other system in order to not to loose all at the end. If you can use the variance to your advantage, maybe there is a change of some kind, but not within the same system. Happy coming summer to all 🐝

[@RouletteMan]

What you describe is correct IF you play mindlessly. That's exactly the difference. You believe that any playing strategy and wagering plan is absolutely equal to any random way of betting. This is where we disagree. We believe STRATEGY can make a difference in the "MID RUN" (forget about the long run, we'll all be dead by then).

[@robira1313]

Most of us don't go to casinos every day to worry about all of this. Just know your limit, know when to walk, and have fun. You can't win if you don't play.

[@PaperBagMan884]

Can't lose either, which is far greater of a chance than winning.

[@richhousley9969]

Have fun when you play

[@cyanbeck]

Somewhat agree. I once experienced a lost session which was about 500 spins and there was no Zero. Mathematically it was a "fair game" in these 500 spins, but the win rate was only 30% if kept betting on Red. The deviation is much matter compared to the house edge in real life.

[@brettmasonmedia]

Why would you agree then. In your example if there had been a house edge you would have lost an additional 2.7% on top of what you already lost due to them paying you Less than fair for each win.

[@2suss412]

They cheat I played roullet for long time I use to pick 25 numbers vs 13 I would lose 5-6 in a row wow

[@Learner5555]

2 SUSS you tripled your bets ? Not good, American wheel is much harder. French roulette is the best.

[@themarketgamer5611]

I've seen worse happen, someone was betting 30 numbers and they lost 9 times in a row. They ended up losing around one thousand in 30 minutes, I got up and stopped playing but kept watching because I could tell the wheel was acting "strange".

[@tube1062]

@Simpleguy It would be easy to rig a slot machine, but how do you rig the roulette wheel.? A chip or a magnet in the roulette ball.? Or perhaps they can mechanically tilt the wheel on command.? I can easily understand that they may target YOU, if you happen to be the only player at the table. If that's not the case, then they would have to run a rather elaborate scheme in order to constantly target those who stand to lose the most..?

[@ArtDesignHobby]

@@themarketgamer5611 like a number 3 times in a row happens so often as it became one of roulette rules of probability xD

[@robira1313]

@Simpleguy ....,House doesn't need to cheat, nor would they risk losing their gambling license.

[@cava-ft2vi]

It's a ping pong between short term commanded by law of third with repeats of single numbers, streets, dozens.. And long term results commanded by law of compensation.. Once u know how to make use of these two phenomenas.. The game is in your hand

[@shortydoall]

Care to give more detalis about your theory?...

[@HRGreenShark]

When playing Roulette....it can be beat...but you cannot bet on every spin. I bet on dozens and look for patterns before wagering. Sometimes I will sit out 5 consecutive spins or more before placing a bet.

[@kentuckwhite6701]

My last 11 trips to the casino, I left a winner. My winnings were almost all from the Roulette wheel. I played mostly on the electronic game which seats up to 8 players. It gets 30 spins an hour but gives you very little time to place bets. The table Roulette was actually better to me but much slower, sometimes only 6 to 8 spins each hour...too slow to make money quickly.Roulette can be beat, but as a player, you HAVE to have strong self discipline, and there will be times that you will constantly lose, and it's best to walk away and come back later. There is no room for emotions in gambling.

[@richhousley9969]

I play every day. In 2919 my longest winning streak was 61 days, up over 2,000. In 2020 down 1,200

[@masterstacker2833]

I'm calling "Bravo-Sierra" on this video.

[@tyler238]

What’s that mean?

[@ChefBurns1]

@@tyler238 BS

[@lucasvignolireis8181]

Total

[@learn4change681]

Perfect. The solution is in risk management and understanding of probabilities.

[@kokpeng201]

4:12 36 times your bet = 3600%, not 360%

[@internetuser8006]

Thank you. This video had me feeling stupid for the math used intuitively not making any sense to me. I also spotted a flaw in their math. It's hilarious how rife with errors this video is.

[@JFairhart]

I accept your challenge. I have a strategy that wins consistently and recovers losses. My current experiment is to play 10 games. I am at game 7 with over $14k in winnings with using a $3k bank roll.

[@RouletteMan]

My challenge is not about a losing or winning session. It's about the impossibility of guaranteeing 100% win even if a small advantage was in our favor. We want to show that variance can easily kill a small advantage like 3%.

[@JFairhart]

RouletteMan - Ok, then simply explain why it’s not the 3% less payout that we lose. And once your done, your argument is really that one should never play roulette. We play for a chance to win not for a 100% probability of winning. The real motivating factor is learning a strategy that increases ones chance of winning consistently. For example, my last session was 86 spins with 65 wins and 21 loses or 65% wins and 24% loses. With my strategy my bets placed resulted in 86% wins and only 14% loses with a total profit of $4400. My experience is that having consecutive loses is what kills and not having a large enough bank roll to recover three consecutive loses. I am continuing to test my strategy until I have 5,000 spins to test prove my winning strategy. Then it’s on to the casinos as soon as they reopen.

[@RouletteMan]

The explaining is done in the video if you watch carefully. I totally agree with you that we don't need any 100% guarantee in order to be able to win. Something being not certain doesn't mean it is not likely. The video is very thorough, everything we have to say, is said in the video.

[@okorocha12]

@@RouletteMan Totally agree your video was clear. You made very valid points and I agree with all you said

[@natural9743]

Here is the only way I know how to beat the house edge-quit when you lose and quit when you win -if you have no discipline it doesn't matter what way you play you will always lose. Winning at the casino or in any other form of gambling is really a business and the professional gambler will not experience the highs and lows of the addicted gambler and therefore will have less fun -less grief but much more money.

[@modehghan4896]

Wow, well sald.

[@RealmsOfThePossible]

The stoic idea of 'preferred indifference'

[@skyclaw]

The author of this video doesn’t understand the argument they are attempting to refute. No-one is saying that it’s impossible to play roulette and come out ahead, even after a significant number of spins. What the mathematical result shows is that any possible roulette bet is more likely to lose money than to win it, and because each spin is independent, any combination of bets on successive spins is also more likely to lose you money than gain it, and the longer you play, the worse, on average, you will do-if you walk away from the table with more money than you started with, you did it against the odds.

[@scottadam9327]

My strategy at roulette is pretty easy and it’s working me. I divide wheel as 6 parts with every 6 straight numbers no zeros and play each part one by one no matter I win or lose. But if I lose straight 3 spins I double the bet. This way no need to guess the numbers. It takes time but I always come home with money. I suggest electronic roulette at casino

[@ThePlypose]

Do you play said 6 tell you win or switch to new 6 after each spin.

[@RouletteMan]

Interesting approach. Maybe even worth a video about it!

[@scottadam9327]

Damarcus Taylor I play each part (6 straight numbers on the wheel) one after the other either I lost or win. If I lost three times I double the bet and do the same. You can do these by choosing 4 or 5 numbers too but it needs big bank roll since the chances are less.

[@scottadam9327]

RouletteMan Yes it’s worth a video. It takes time as I said. But I promise you will make at least $50 profit in hour. Remember we all work for $20-$40hr jobs and should not expect money in minutes. Patience is important. Here all you have to focus is the wheel and numbers. So no mind pressure too. Literally I paid bills for two months just by spending 5hours a day in casino by playing this strategy.

[@michaelrobson1627]

Sorry what do you mean by 6 'straight' numbers? Can you explain your idea a little more clearly? Cos it sounds good. Thank you.

[@freshfalcon3996]

Denying math doesn’t make it go away. The facts don’t care about your opinions. Regression to the mean is a certainty over time.

[@paulroos8658]

U might not win in the long run but in the short run 35 to 1 can hit

[@rodrigosierra11]

Im new to this world so Im curious. Can casinos legally rig roulette tables to profit one way or another? If the casino sees you winning with a strategy can they stop your win streak? In those cases of extreme fluctuations that were stated in the video.

[@FrozenByFire]

Usually they won't, but me and a friend got the whole table shut down at a small casino for winning too much once.

[@MoltenMouseMetal]

The best way to win is start with a huge bankroll and try to play for a smaller percentage of the initial bet. Trying to double your money or more with a grind-type system is just wasting your time. You may as well just put the whole thing on an even-money bet and cross your fingers.

[@GaryLuKOTH]

That is not a way to win. Sizing your bet does not change your odds of winning. It only changes how much you win or lose.

[@vetopro1820]

It’s all about the correct progression! And I don’t mean you double the bet on each loss!what I do is I kind of establish a progression or different progression for different session! How ?? By taking lots factors into consideration! Just look at the big picture

[@RouletteMan]

Agreed

[@cava-ft2vi]

First rule.. If I don't have hours available to go thought at least 200 spins.. I will not sit and play

[@RouletteMan]

Good advice for serious players!

[@HrhFish]

On line Casino's use algorithms that can figure out your strategy in 20 minutes. They are just out to rob you. Albert Einstein said the only way you will win at Roulette is robbing the croupier.

[@GaryLuKOTH]

It does not matter what your strategy is. Mathematics proves that there is no strategy in roulette that wins in the long run.

[@tube1062]

@@GaryLuKOTH In the long run yes. The presenter is right that the same thing applies to the financial markets as well. Commissions or spreads is the equivalent of the zero or double zero on the roulette table. However, the financial markets has one big advantage. They can't impose "table limits"...

[@robira1313]

Really? Because I won.

[@cheftzi-vahben-hurphillips4057]

Aside from House Edge - it is very suspecting that the roulette wheel, roulette ball and roulette table are wired altogether (sensors on the table, magnets on the wheel and the ball). I am very much convinced of this fraud because often times the ball will roll on and fall on the slot where no bets are wage or uncovered numbers on the table. I can beat roulette with the absence of this fraud - just pure fair and square play!

[@justincampbell308]

exactly .....you my friend could not be more right

[@mrchordstriker]

The roulette motor used to be incalculable. I had the pleasure recently to see a new table get installed. The motor had a isn connector, going right into a computer!!! Folks, this is in our faces fraud!! They CAN totally control the ball and cheat us now, and where is the oversight to stop it? What oversight? They are in our face cheating us now. Computers controlling the roulette ball is blatant illegal cheating. And they probably laugh because we are powerless to stop their cheating.

[@RouletteMan]

@@mrchordstriker Thank you very much for that comment. I would like to pin it on the top of the comments but I can't because it's a reply to another comment. Anyway, we are preparing an astonishing documentary about rigged (online) roulette games. It is unbelievable what is happening and it would be really funny if people didn't lose their money on these games. Stay tuned!

[@mrchordstriker]

Like I said, if the motor were innocently boogeying along with basic power, it would NOT need a USB connection. That USB gave their cheating away...only a computer can control the motor at that poinr, and believe me, plotting ball trajectory and controlling said trajectory are simple math formulas done at a billionth of a second. Total cheat right there and NO ONE is calling them out.

[@justinmelick6021]

The automated Roulette machines absolutely are rigged. They will go on defense and set out to bankrupt system players. Your best chance is to keep switching seats and change your betting strategy. Also place your bet at the last possible second.

[@ZeusHelios]

The fact that we can win sometimes but not always shows that we can win, so we only need look at how we're winning sometimes and use that strategy. Maybe that will work.

[@kennydavis184]

You are right roulette is all about timing and you have to be patient that's the key the roulette table, wheel and board are all hooked up to a computer and one thing about a computer it has a pattern just wait until you see that consistent pattern then you place your bet it always have a pattern that it gets into that's how computers work ok here in Biloxi at Grand the table on the left it when everytime when the third number from the top it will go back to the the numbers next to it everytime and nobody at the can see it they just keep playing numbers call chasing another key is the it will play the same numbers over once they have been off the board rite the numbers down when first get to the table so you can see and remember what's been played this will help look for the pattern and be patient then place your bet and you can win big this help no guessing play what the computer gives you it always gets into a pattern another example I've seen it could be almost all black and it's playing even numbers look at the wheel start with the number 2 go three numbers to your right then have 4 and so on the same for 31-35 and the 20s and for 1-9 when it was playing all black it was playing mostly 20s and all your 30s black ant people was still betting all over the board not winning nothing trust me that computer will get into a pattern really look at numbers and you will find it

[@dieterromanwicht6]

I play such a system where I win every time, well yes, every time. It took me few years to figure out what it could be. It´s really simple and logical.

[@janicmeier1]

Dont use live tables and change the table every 2-3 rounds dont play red black use no numbers just rows combined whit something from the side never tripple or double at the same table go in take 2 rows and 2 of the 3rds bet high the first time if you win next table prevents you from being listed and good winning system

[@paultaylor2611]

Easier way to explain without all that mathematics is place one dollar / pound on every number including 0 , the payout is 35/1 max. As someone previously said , only people who have discipline enough to stop betting when your ahead. I won regular because I didn't go in to be someone who thought he could make millions . Have a set bank amount , set amount you want to win ( within reason ) .Don't get greedy Don't take cards in only cash . If you loose ( which somedays you will ) leave. ( only bet what you can afford ). The casinos will ( if you are a regular winning ) switch croupiers , switch balls ( different types of ball material. Limit maximum single bets are a killer also . In UK usually 100 pound unless pit manager agrees ( depending on your status / celebrity ) . Those who know have watched stars / celebrities loose large amounts will know. Every time I won I would buy something nice or book a holiday . In essence you can win but like any organisation loosing money eventually the casinos will fathom you out. Short term enjoy your winnings.

[@Learner5555]

Do big casinos ban winners...?

[@Learner5555]

House edge only applies, when u play without a progression consistently for a long period of time.

[@RouletteMan]

House edge applies all the time, no way around it. But this doesn't mean you can't win.

[@tube1062]

@@RouletteMan Mathematically, there will be as many winning streaks as there are losing streaks. In other words, progression systems need to take advantage of those winning streaks as well...

[@somerpg]

The same can be said for slots also. Don't spend a long time on any game. The best winners I've ever seen spend nearly 5-10 minutes.

[@Learner5555]

@@tube1062 do you mean a positive progression?

[@jimnpen8451]

I just recently gotten bit by the roulette bug on a cruise recently. I had never played before but the day I was leaving a friend explained the martingale strategy which I barely understood at the time. Anyways, I played red and black conservatively and before I knew I was up 300 from a 25 buy in. Paid for my drinks for the rest of the cruise and now I am here wanting to know more.

[@Learner5555]

Beginners luck........the planetary transits maybe... Roulette is an addictive dangerous game.......how good are u at high school math n it takes patience. Martingale is the not agood strategy for starters..

[@schemesgoboom994]

So you either don't understand math or you have a casino and want people to be more confident in betting. Educate people, don't uneducate them.

[@paulroos8658]

I win at roulette all the time, problem is i get greedy and dont leave when im up

[@alexwinni347]

Paul Roos the game you play inside your head is the hardest to overcome, hot heading is to get when a winning steak is gone and you start losing ñ, that’s why I find I win the most with a friend who is not betting so therefore has a cold head: always listen to the cold head and you will be profitable

[@stevenrobin82]

I lost $30,000 . I always win big but I to get greddy and loss it all every DAM time

[@toniod.mitchell1396]

@@stevenrobin82 in order to get your lost money back, you have to set a small goal every time you play. I know you want all your money back immediately, but it's highly unlikely to happen. You would need to strike two $500.00 bets on one single number to walk away with $35,000.00 and we both know, you ain't that lucky. Set your goal to win $100.00 a night. Bet $5.00 chips on inside #s, one win =$175.00. $100.00 ×10nights= $1,000.00. There's 30 nights in a month. This is a start a chipping away at your lost money. Don't get greedy.

[@tilted_yullo5820]

Tony Mitchell Ok to set a goal every time but I don’t get your strategy of betting

[@MrAnomic]

Wow, all that for someone to try to tell me that gambling does not have short term guaranteed outcomes and that people can figure out how to game the comp system such that they can come out ahead of the house edge some of the time. All that is true, but there is a concept in probability that's known as the Law of Averages. This is not a theorem, not a possibility, it's a scientific Law, which means it is absolutely a true and proven concept in mathematics. So on a strict gambling perspective, you will lose money directly from the gambling, over time, guaranteed. But what about comps? Well, in the old days before the eye in the sky, when your comps were based on what the pit boss saw when he observed your game, you could increase your bets when the pit boss was watching and then decrease your bets when he wasn't and as long as you weren't caught bobbing your bets you might be able to get away with gaming the comps. However, nowadays that's a lot harder to do because if a large comp package is expected to be offered, a casino will usually have their camera's observe your game when the pit boss isn't looking. In that case it's hard to get them to over comp you. But all that is academic. It has nothing to do with a betting strategy or the odds on a bet. It has to do with trying to scam the house on comps, enough to overcome the house edge. With that said, there is no betting strategy that can overcome the house edge over time. The best advice is to institute a stop loss and stop win, bet to have fun and enjoy the experience, win or lose. Or...learn to count cards in Blackjack.

[@warrenali8151]

I accept your challenge of no 0 and a 1 unit bonus every 100 spins. I bet 1 on red and 1 on black. Guaranteed 2 return for every 2 bet so impossible to lose and 1 unit every 100 spins as a bonus profit. So now I have worked that out. Please keep your promise and give me a system guaranteed to beat the game with 0 in effect.

[@RouletteMan]

Then you admit that there can be no system to beat roulette even if you have the advantage, since you can't think of anything better. So you also admit that the house edge can not have too great an effect on player's results.

[@warrenali8151]

@@RouletteMan how have I said that? With the advantage as you stated, the system I stated above is a guaranteed 1 unit per 100 spins profit. This is the house edge reversed and is the reason why it works. You stated in your video that if I can beat the casino with the edge you provided me you would show me a system that can beat the casinos when they have the edge, so please keep your promise and do so.

[@jessefletcher7145]

Bet on black a minimum amount your willing to lose. if you lose double it. if you lose again quadruple it, until you win. then you'll win more than you had in the first place. never bet on more than one spot that pays back x1. You'll win alot.

[@okorocha12]

I wish I could "like" this video 100 times! This speaker talks sense and its the best video explaining the house edge and its myth here on youtube

[@RouletteMan]

We really appreciate your kind words!

[@collam1299]

I played electronic roulette. I deliberately bet for 36 numbers, and left one number I didn’t bet, and guess what, that number won! Why? Because they have cameras, and they are watching you😁

[@dmac3927]

If someone did have the holy grail roulette system and could grind a nice living off of that, how could someone capitalize on it for big money? I know someone who plays for a living here in Las Vegas and does very well, but he is not interested in sharing his system unless he knew he could make $3 million off of it.

[@21Sanco]

This what u mean doesnt exist house edge always win

[@Learner5555]

Does he win every session? Whats his br ? Wat is the win percentage n edge he has ? If u an edge it easy to convert br into 100x n even 1000× for that matter.

[@oscardelgado4259]

Casinos would watch this video they are always watching advantage player's every time I go to play blackjack and they think I'm counting the security guards stand on the sides just to watch me but they never kick me out cause I lose anyway

[@billionear]

I agree with you. Too much thought is given to loosing. Roulette is not as random as people think it is. In fact it follows 2 simple laws. The law of natural order and the law of probability. For instance I can tell you without any hesitation that there is only one outcome after every spin. And that outcome will be 1 of only 37 possible outcomes. This is another important point to remember. It is a closed system. For example it will not be 45 Red or 63 Black. This is not a natural outcome. Because the level of 'Randomness' is LIMITED to ONLY 1 out of 37 results. Sounds stupid right? Me stating the obvious? And yet players still seem to think the Roulette wheel does not play 'Fair'. It is 'Random'. But as you rightfully say when was the last time red spun 7yrs in a row? Or the number 9 showed up 6,000 spins in a row? Never! And never will. Because it is not in the law of natural order.It would be actually unnatural for that to happen as it would be for zero never to show up in 12yrs worth of spins or even 12 hours worth of spins. Doesn't happen. The Roulette Wheel is an amazing generator which is programmed to spin 50/50 odds and evens as well as red and black. That is in accordance to the natural law of order. The same natural law that forbids female children from being born into the world out numbering male children. There has never been and never will be a decade where there is only females born. No males. Bet on it. But yet the experts and the Mathematician will tell you that this is in fact the case. It should occur. But again it doesn't. So then if it is not random there must be some form of order? A pattern? And if so why is it roulette seems so random? Well it's because we do not understand where in the cycle of 'natural order'it is. And thats what makes it seem random. It is up to the player to determine where in the natural order or what count its up to. I discovered there is a certain Geometry that governs numbers. That geometry helped me to make certain decisions around other numbers appearing soon after. For instance I noticed that if the numbers 7-8-6-0-18 showed up one of the following 4 numbers 6-9-35-36 would appear inside the next 3 spins and sometimes they will appear in all 3 spins. Common pattern. And I have found many many others just like them. Try it. The next time you see those numbers come out take 6-9-35-36 straight up and stay with 3 spins. If you hit one of them on the 1st spin go again you will most likely hit again on the same 4 numbers.

[@RouletteMan]

Thanks for your feedback!

[@betaglobalnews]

Cool!

[@zsoltstemler9999]

Red only needs to go 15 in a row, not 5 years.

[@Learner5555]

I agree with what you say 7 to 8 mins....

[@jeffreywalters6948]

With a limited amount you can bet, that is what shuts down progression strategies. Most are $200. You will easily exceed that if you were betting table mins of $10 and hit a bad run of 6 spins. You are capped.

[@jorgetoloza269]

Roulette is control by magnets..

[@SerpentStar_]

Steal the ball, crack it open and see. What’s inside or what its made of 🏐

[@kilixior]

x35 is not 350% 10 x 35 = 350 350% of 10 = 35

[@themarketgamer5611]

7:34 In another video you posted you said it wasn't a random game. Also I can tell you it isn't random and is predictable, I win because I examine the probability of systems I come up with against the hundreds of consecutive results I collected from dozens of wheels, if it beats all of them and is the most profitable then I use the system. Basically I try to predict the future. It's also easy to go through all that data and test my systems because I'm a programmer and data analyst, if I were to collect 5000 numbers of data I can process it in 30 minutes. That's how I win, it's not that hard if you have the right tools, in this case an app to go through the data but I could do the same with the stock market if I wanted but you need a lot to make a lot in stocks.

[@tube1062]

Do you have any luck with it in online casinos, or does it only work in brick and mortar ones.?

[@GaryLuKOTH]

tube1062 Do not listen to this person. There is no advantaged strategy that would help you win in the long run.

[@Learner5555]

I need the data please thnx

[@jacoblarsen6227]

Only advantage play is biased wheel. This man is a gambler ignoring the odds probably sponsored by the casino

[@toniod.mitchell1396]

Doubt it.

[@constantineargyropoulos7066]

Due to philosophical diarea you've forgotten completely to talk about the strategy you've bragged about.

[@RouletteMan]

We have many good strategy videos you can watch.This video is not about a specific strategy. It is about determining whether it is possible to win or not. Many people consider it mathematically impossible. We explain why winning can not be dismissed as possibility.

[@samsonpug]

An evil game that has ruined many lives. Don’t play it.

[@masterkiller4704]

Online or in casino?

[@lennya]

when luck is not with you. You lose.

[@oxdevil]

YES, I do believe that the house edge can be beaten and I am writing a book about it... but then I am too selfish to share it ...hahaha

[@aaronjerome6024]

Roulette is beatable, I have been an advantage player for 4 yrs. However they alluded to no winning system and I won't tell anyone mine... lol

[@MrHRmario]

Why

[@goodvibes7343]

Was it a crystal ball or a time machine? Ure not a time traveller if u didn't see my comment bfre.."now"

[@jellygiraffe]

You can win, if you get lucky, that's about it. Roulette is a true RNG, it can't be predicted and any patterns can only be observed in retrospect. Strategies can help you lose less and avoid counter productive bets but that's all. Martingale is the closest to "winning" strategy you're going to find, but it is negated by max bet limits (usually 100x the minimum bet). Calling any roulette strategy a way to beat the game, is massively over selling it. This is a game that has been around for over half millennium and is still unbeaten, even by its creator who, incidentally, killed himself in frustration over being unable to beat it. You simply can't get around the math, many have tried, all have failed, the game wouldn't be in the casino otherwise. I have been in the industry for 20 years and met literally thousands of people with "winning strategies" all of them show a net loss in the player tracking records. If you want to beat the house, play blackjack, count cards and dont get caught. Otherwise, see casinos for what they are, entertainment. Take in what you are willing to spend on your evenings entertainment, leave you cards at home and have fun. If you win, great - but don't see it a source of income, because it's not, and never will be.

[@GaryLuKOTH]

That is all true but it is something that people will never learn. To this day, people are still ignorant enough to think they have a winning strategy and that they know better than mathematicians who proved that you cannot win in the long run.

[@okorocha12]

You are so right!

[@purpleroul6417]

Exactly. Gamblers don't lose 2.7% but a lot more, because they don't know how to manage their bankroll. Read 'the roulette winner' by Lee Tutor for the art of playing roulette.

[@GaryLuKOTH]

No, they lose 2.7% because that is the casino’s advantage. No matter what strategy they use, they will lose 2.7% if they play for long enough.

[@cccccc499]

2.7% is the overall house edge.. you take all the losers, all the winners and over millions, billions of dollars bet the casino's profit continuously oscillates around 2.7% of all money wagered

[@marvinratchford7913]

At last, the brave voice of reason in a gambling world parroting the impossibility of heavier than air flight. The same (universal) math clearly says 35 to the power of four is 1,500,625. 11 to the power of 6 is 1,771,561. Those are raw worst case scenarios for consecutive straight up and row bets respectively. So, fundamentally a million dollars in just a few or so spins is mathematically ALWAYS possible... And of course four or five consecutive ANYTHING in roulette exists well within our lifetimes and bankrolls.

[@cava-ft2vi]

And basically 8 can say it's the other way round of what casino claim.. Actually the more spins u play.. The more accurate will be the winning expectation.. Its all about winning ratio and law of compensation.. U need to expect a 50% chance Coming out 1 out of 2,2 out of 4, 3 out of 6,,4 out of 8 and etc etc.. As u can see the more long run go.. The more probability ull have to get closer to expectation. A street of 6..ull will expect it 1 out of 6 spins.. 2 out of 12, 3 out of 18.. It might happens 50 spins without.. But in 300 spins the winning ratio will definetly compansate.. From this theory.. Feel free to make up ur desired system.. And be ready to play hor hours before u can see profits

[@cava-ft2vi]

It's a ping pong between short term results commanded by law of third where events repeats(. Single numbers, streets, dozens) and long run regulated by law of compensation.. Once u know how to make use of these two phenomena.. The game is in your hand

[@shortydoall]

Its not only the % attached to every type of bet (chance, dozen, lines..etc) , but also you can play with any % you want, regardless the bet. How? Well, thats part of the binomial calculation. For example, you can play with a 96% success betting on even chances, if you follow the binomial, wich says that you will have that % of success in 5 spins. Or 8 spins betting on docens (or any group of 12 numbers), for example. And so on.

[@williaminus6545]

???? Wheels and dealers are biased. Calculate the bias or gamble. I choose advantage play.

[@damztv5571]

All my money we lost that game 20% win 80% lose

[@mrmarvellous5378]

I have won a lot of money playing Roulette Tournaments and this video is good advice. Sure Tournaments are not playing against the house, you play against other players over 35 spins and winner progresses to next round but in the process of playing Tournaments (I do not play against he house) I found some very interesting anomalies in the spin results and was able to use the variance to beat my opponents over the short term. In the final of one Tournaments the last spin I had to pick one number to win and sure enough it came up, $50,000 first prize for me for a $200 dollar entry fee but I came second in another Tournament where the last bet of my opponent was on 8 Black and I chose to place a minimum bet on red so if his number didn't come up I win,, sure enough number eight hit as against my (single zero wheel) 36 other options which would have resulted in my winning, I was shocked that some one else saw something I didn't, guess I was too cocky.

[@theosutton4022]

the winning strategy with no house edge and hundred spin payouts would be to put even bets on red and black and wait, you evil casino rep you

[@GaryLuKOTH]

If the edge is in favor of the player, all strategies are winning strategies in the long run. The only thing you need to worry about is variance.

[@quanadam6717]

5k bet 10times win 1 , every time you bet profit 25$. so you win at 10th you profit 250$.

[@Learner5555]

Never try to convince roulette atheists. Period.

[@cava-ft2vi]

I agreed with u.. And I have a system.. And surprisingly it doesn't work in short term.. But only in long term.

[@doright8355]

People can't win because of GREED, and PRIDE! When they win $50, they want more $$$ (GREED). When they lose $100, instead of walking away. The Player wants to get it back. Players hate to lose when gambling (PRIDE).

[@robertkay5624]

show us the way to win?

[@laupkhuen5419]

I'm very eager to help you. Don't simply bet. Must wait until a certain pattern of the spins turns up and then only start betting. Line bet (6 nos ) is the best. For example if the number 30 came out just bet on the two lines 25 to 30 and 31 to 36. Once hit must wait for the next result or if you want to take a risk bet again the same lines but with less amount until a change appear. I had seen before that 25 to 36 came out in a certain occasion more than 10 times in a roll and this is not impossible. You need a bit of luck also in this type of gambling. Good luck to you and happy gambling then.

[@subasurf]

All this video did was demonstrate how poor your understanding of mathematics is and what the mathematics infers. If the house didn't have an edge they wouldn't have the game. You ranted about debunking the house edge, but at no point did you debunk it, you just made it more obvious how real it actually is.

[@RouletteMan]

We are happy that you agree with our arguments.

[@torlumnitor8230]

Rouletteman gambling addicts with a camera.

[@RouletteMan]

I gave you a like! ;-)

[@a.j.conway1442]

You are so wrong it’s insane.

[@brianlevesque6906]

You're wrong.

[@donny8930]

I thought you was going to tell us how it can be beaten......

[@rovinson331]

3500% not 350%

[@RouletteMan]

Thanks for the correction

[@oldschool4372]

Everybody talks about the "long run", but remember, in the long run we're all dead. Don't play for the long run. I and others I know often win at American roulette by leaving the table when we're ahead. I've done this on a cruise ship and in casinos. In the casinos you come out even more ahead if you get drinks and comps, as the cruise ships still make you pay for your drinks. I also like his comment comparing the house edge to a tax, and that people still go into business even though they have to pay a tax on their profits--usually more than any casino edge.

[@johnshoultz4532]

im good enough at math to calculate the ev of any roulette strategy, and i disagree with you, your logic is flawed, and your analogies dont apply, there is no way to beat roulette, sure you can get lucky or find a way to lose less , but the math is sound. by the way i didnt hear you present a winning stategy.

[@bassamsaid2001]

The spins from hell so true,still possible to win in the long run,set your target and play within your limits and scale up ,worth the risk.

[@jonlee2623]

Hi , much appreciate your content on this subject, I use a 7 unit straight up bet ..in 5 spin blocks, with a view to hitting once every 5 spins approx..my buy in is 5 spins of 7 units..if I don't hit in 5 spins I quit, if I hit I keep playing ..ie 2 hits 10 spins 3 15 etc ,,as soon as that average moves beyond 5 I quit ...once again I much enjoy your content ..P.S I only play European roulette

[@RouletteMan]

Thanks for your comment. Indeed, try to play only at Single Zero games. If everyone avoided Double Zero roulette, then this would push casinos to offer more Single Zero roulette games.

[@cupidstunt70]

I like this method Jon, how do you pick your numbers and how are you doing in terms of profit?

[@tommyfu9271]

@@cupidstunt70 he's losing.he's playing a negative expectation game making negative expectation bets. no amount of bullshit will change that.

[@osmanali7826]

" you just cant beat those roulette spins from hell " ... funnily enough the sequence is never in our favour.

[@johnnewbegin2548]

Its all luck...carry a rabbit's foot and play the numbers you like...

[@giorgioanastasios4734]

I have a system that does

[@alipromo53]

Where u are now?

[@arcatacompany]

So are you a foreigner you sound like you have an English voice because I'm pretty sure most American casinos have a zero and a double zero

[@russlehman2070]

Roulette is the most honest game in the casino. Note that I said honest, not fair. Roulette displays its ridiculously high house advantage openly: Thirty-eight slots in the wheel, but all the bets pay an amount that would be fair if there were thirty six slots.. Anybody with even rudimentary math skills can figure out that, with an unbiased wheel, the game is a losing proposition. Anybody who tells you differently is a moron.

[@arcatacompany]

Well I don't know where your research or your video originates from or where you're accustomed to playing but I've gambled all over the country and let me tell you a little something about California is slightly different and in California the only roulette that we have is now electronic roulette no dealer spins the ball in theory it's the same thing except we have one zero and one double zero now acording to your math that means the house gets 5% double zeros

[@marktirabassi7873]

Bonkers my head is hurting now

[@Jeff_Thomas]

Emotions run business and the stock market. Roulette is emotionless. This guy must work for the casino.