Where Does the Royal Family Get Their Money?

'Where Does the Royal Family Get their Money?'
Have you ever wondered where the Royal Family get their money from, what they spend each year, and how much they generate for Britain? This explainer details what 'the firm' has spent in the last 12 months, and how much they cost the British people.
#SovereignGrant #RoyalFamily #BuckinghamPalace
Follow us for more royal news, history, and highlights:
♛ Subscribe to our brand new show, exclusive to Snapchat - / 1380105951844352
♛ Subscribe to our KZbin channel (tap the bell icon and stay up to date with all the latest Royal videos!) - bit.ly/3jNBYZ7
♛ Find us on TikTok / royalfamilychannel
♛ Follow us on Facebook - / royalfamilychannel
♛ Tweet with us! - / royalfamilyitnp

[@dalemac614]

This report is so nuts the sovereign grant is not public money; it is not income tax money collected by parliament. I don’t see how with a straight face the English Republicans can say these things. That money is profit from the Crown Estate a vast holding of property and areas historically owned outright and controlled by the head (king or queen ) of the royal family, these properties passing on to each subsequent monarch. However George 3 took these properties and put them in Trust for the “Crown” to be managed by Parliament provided they managed the money to run the States operations including the cost of wars (he was tired of being responsible personally for the bills to say it plainly) and they appropriate an amount needed by the “Crown” to ru their households and the everyday activities the Family needs to do to complete their duty to the Sovereign. Under Queen Elizabeth instead of debating the amount each year making it look like parliament is giving the family tax money a percentage of the profits from these properties, industries, and holding of the Crown Estate be transferred to the Crown for running the business of the royal family which includes being the head of state representing the people of GB at home and abroad. That percentage is like 20 odd percent of which now the Crown must pay back to parliament the income taxes that would be levied if this amount was income of an ordinary citizen. The residual amount is this 86 million of tax payer money she speaks of (she didn’t mention the dutchy of landcaster owned by the Queen who realizes all profits from it so does that figure included in the 86million) This is wrongly labeled as tax payer money Even dividing it out to cost per census number of people in GB as if they passed the hat. It is just wrong in my opinion. I’m an American and I may have some od these details wrong but I believe them to be true. If I am wrong please explain how this money is “tax payer money” let’s say the GB people decide to end the monarchy (fire the royal family) and elect a President, so they plan on stealing(seizing) the Crown Estate properties placed in Trust or the family with the parliament the trustee managing it? Or maybe you plan on seizing it all and forcing the family into exile fleeing in fear of being jailed and hung (the standard way governments depose their monarch? From an Americans view when explained like tjis report it sounds like they are handed 100 million form the cash collected from the people but in reality the people kept 80 percent of the profit for managing the properties legitimately owned by the royal family. Again am I wrong please explain.

[@Ater_Draco]

"*British republicans not English republicans. Their are people in all 4 countries of the UK who campaign for a Republic, not just in England. Others are campaigning for Wales and Scotland to end the Union, become independent commonwealth countries and retain the Constitutional monarch as Head of State. Others in Northern Ireland are campaigning to join the Republic of Ireland

[@karldelavigne8134]

This is full of inaccuracies. The Sovereign Grant is a percentage of the profits of the Crown Estate. The Government does very well out of this arrangement because the rest of the profits go to the government. So, not only does the Monarchy cost taxpayers nothing, excepting the costs of security, it benefits taxpayers many times over both from the Crown Estate revenue and the boost to tourism etc.

[@ameliarannestiggins2345]

Not to mention that the Queen pays tax.

[@seyrah1235]

No matter how many times this has been explained people still complain how much they cost. My thing is that, a country has over 100 forms of gaining revenue, especially one with the UK's large economy. Taxes are just one of them. So if money is spent on the Monarchy, then it could be money from exports, or the tech industry or the tourism industry. And members of the Royal family pay more taxes than most. So if they receive tax dollars, then it's also their money.

[@dragosapina5692]

It is theft. It is just wrong to state that the sovereign grant is not taxpayer money. Crown property is not Windsor property. They have no entitlement to it and evert pound they receive via the sovering grant is theft from the taxpayer.

[@seyrah1235]

@@dragosapina5692 The Crown Estate does not belong to the Queen personally and it does not belong to the government, therefore, not to the people. It belongs to the Crown, which means it belongs to the Monarch in right of the Crown. And since it isn't illegal and the treasury receives 75% of all profits, it isn't theft.

[@ameliarannestiggins2345]

@@dragosapina5692 It's not theft though.

[@carmelitajones7779]

That is a lie. The government knows exactly how much money the monarchy and royal family brings in or rather generates for the UK. When people travel , they often book flights, with hotels, maybe even rent a car. While at a hotel, they know from the cards and room service. The businesses know how much they generate from tourism. Bus fares, train rides. When HRH Princess Catherine wears something, people go to shops, on line and buy that product or a similar product. They know that a royal generated that interest. Neil Sean just reported that HM did that iconic skit with Paddington Bear and sales of marmalade, Paddington Bear has increased around the world. The billions and billions and billions of dollars that the monarchy generates is well accounted for.

[@steven.events]

That's how a bear can rest at ease. 💷

[@ameliarannestiggins2345]

What this channel also forgot to mention was that State Visits, whether receiving foreign dignitaries or visiting another country, is at the request of the UK government. Those Visits that the Family might not necessarily want to do have to be paid for, which is covered by the Sovereign Grant. The State Visits are 'work' and not simply a fun jolly wearing a tiara. This channel, for saying that it's a news channel, is poor at imparting relevant information. ITN - do better.

[@usaintltrade]

LONG LIVE THE 👑 QUEEN

[@dragosapina5692]

They're not as good since Freddy died

[@pilkpog7952]

God save the queen

[@dragosapina5692]

And her facist regime?

[@Sotto_]

Far better return on the dollar than most any other country in the world. The Monatchy brings in over £2 Billion a year in tourism and trade. That money hoes to fund the NHS and other social programs that the UK has. This year, after the Jubilee and reopening post covid, that number will be substantially higher, probably close to doubling that figure.

[@jamesmed4]

No mention of the crown estate, that Prince Charles pays taxes and that the Palace generates money during the two months it’s open for tours. Also not mentioned that the palace has been neglected for decades and was in desperate need of new plumbing, electrical and a roof. So the cost of maintenance should be off set by the tours every summer. The best comparison is what other countries of similar size spend annually on their heads of state and get no positive generations to the overall economy in return. All of the luxuries are paid from the two duchies the cloths, jewelry, interior decoration ect. One major thing is never mentioned the profit the uk media generate from all the documentaries, books and tabloid newspapers. Maybe they should chip in eg how much did they make selling the jubilee concert broadcasting rights?

[@Tractionengine_556]

£102.4 million an increase of £15 million in the past year, this would have been because of the jubilee. It won't be that much next year, it'll go back to around £88 million.

[@Miracleedafiogho34]

Hello Julia how are you doing?

[@magnamarianneczagany8970]

Your hoping but you forgot the 15 million they spent on Andrew paying for his inappropriate relationship with a minor. How about costs for lawyers and the lawsuit. Maybe Maxwell will remember details to shorten her sentence. Charles’s suitcases with cash was that included ? So many unforeseen legal battles looming. No wonder Harry and Meghan skipped town after 4 days. Not wanting to be tainted by the past. Harry still paying rent at Frogmore Cottage isn’t he ?

[@comet1227]

@@Miracleedafiogho34 Julia enjoys not being bugged by men trying to get her account information.

[@jokoyaya4679]

Long-life, healthy and wealthy the queen, the family & the kingdom 🙏

[@dragosapina5692]

Hey, shes wealthy OK. Long life seems to have come true - and shes been healthy. Three out of three! Can she go now?

[@jokoyaya4679]

Can she go? (Go to somewhere) 1. Logically depends on situation and condition. 2. It depends on her will. 3. Miraculously, it depends on Jesus' will.

[@vipiccb6896]

@@dragosapina5692 more of your vile comments and lies

[@lillieraylevy9878]

Buckingham Palace, Windsor Kensington Palace and other residences are not owned by the Royal Family. The upkeep of these buildings is the public responsibility and would need to be maintained whether the Royal Family was living in them or not.

[@DANSHHD]

It belongs to the crown fund which sends 25% to elizabeth this is royal ascot park in buckingham etc even if there is no monarchy these houses will remain with the royal family as the fund will be disbanded due to the fact that there will be no annual signature of the monarch

[@dragosapina5692]

True. As are all the other assets from which the RF claim to draw a private income. However, there is also the incredible expense of indulging the members of the RF themselves. Each trip in the royal train costs in excess of £20.000. Then there are the helicopters and the private jets, the cost of performing completely unnecessary royal duties which are frequently no more than leisure activities; and dont forget the added cost of security, which is a secret and not included in the sovereign grant. Given that the various public assets are paid for by the taxpayer anyway - as they should be - why do we grant anything to the RF. They contribute nothing and only represent an added and unreasonable cost and waste of resources that could be better channeled elsewhere. I'm not sure what the exact figure is, but I believe Charles gets paid some extraordinary amount per hour ( over £30,000 per hour - yes 30 thousand. He is a senior royal of course, but I think Kate receives well in excess of £200, 000 per week. Still extraordinary given that she doesn't really work (again, I don't have current figures, but her so called royal duties - many of which are no more than leisure activities - involved approximately 3.5 weeks equivalent of full time work in 2019). Clearly the cost of maintaining public assets (which the taxpayer bears in any case) would be much cheaper if not the added financial burden of supporting the royals themselves. They are independently wealthy and can surely pay for thir own planes, trains, security and automobiles. It is an egregious and unjustifiable waste. Larceny, in fact.

[@aerialpyropewpew]

Actually, they kinda are.

[@aerialpyropewpew]

@@dragosapina5692If you need someone to pay your two pounds, let us know. Otherwise get over it.

[@bayousbambino427]

​@@dragosapina5692 Well, those are a lot of words just to say, "I don't know what I'm talking about." You can ask all the governments of the Commonwealth Realms, the militaries, veterans' associations, communities, hospitals, centres, businesses, and the like that've been visited by members of the Royal Family just how much the Royal Family contributes. Oh, and all the charities they've helped as well as the tens of thousands of people aidied by charities and award programs founded by members of the Royal Family. The cost of their official duties is covered by the Sovereign Grant. The Sovereign Grant is NOT tax money. The Royal Family effectively costs British taxpayers a grand total of £0.00. It was your schoolteachers who contributed nothing, By the way, what's your plan for a costless president?

[@anirudhsathya3116]

God save the queen👑

[@Miracleedafiogho34]

Hello you're looking beautiful

[@Aravind-sh8uq]

For what 😂😂😂 For looting India

[@vipiccb6896]

@@Aravind-sh8uq oh look, a foreign troll

[@Aravind-sh8uq]

@@vipiccb6896 😂😂😂who got looted for hundred of years

[@vipiccb6896]

@@Aravind-sh8uq nope

[@Lee-kg7ze]

It was said some where on some show that it works out to just over a pound for every person in the UK to support the expenses of the Royal Family.

[@labellelbv1847]

GOD PROTECT THE QUEEN🇬🇦🇬🇧

[@jenniy7557]

@ tom Thank you, Tom, I agree. God doesn’t save the devil’s minions.

[@dragosapina5692]

God? The last thing the Queen wants is God putting in his two bits in. Shes doing very nicely living a life of heavenly luxury at the expense of others, most of whom will never know anything close to the lavish lifestyle she enjoys, without his butting in. Blessed are the poor indeed, as long as they know their place and continue to pay up. Besides she'll be meeting God soon enough - perhaps, unless she gets the other elevator - and will have a chance to fill him in on her various good deeds then, assuming he doesn't demand she follow the camel through the eye of a needle first, that is. For the time being, though, God protect us from the queen.

[@wolfblitzer1981]

@@vipiccb6896.. 😂😂😂

[@vipiccb6896]

@@vipiccb6896.. back with your VILE attacks

[@vipiccb6896]

@@jenniy7557 YOU are NOT British, so your constant lies and attacks are now proven xenophobia

[@SueProv]

Also the billions that come from tourism.

[@elainebines6803]

Money well spent by the British taxpayer in my opinion 👍

[@kayjay12341]

Agreed

[@jenniy7557]

Did the taxpayers pay the settlement to “Prince” Andrew’s assault victim?

[@bayousbambino427]

Yes, that whole £0.00 is well spent, indeed.

[@elainebines6803]

@@bayousbambino427 works out, 59p per person

[@bayousbambino427]

@@elainebines6803 No, it's £0.00 per person. British taxpayers do not cover the costs of their monarchy. The Sovereign Grant (a percentage of the Crown Estate's profit) and income from the Duchy of Lancaster do.

[@garyparker9054]

Is this channel now owned by The Daily Mail?

[@Ater_Draco]

ITN

[@carolefearnley1990]

Hm funny you won't say how much revenue their brand brings in,I'm finding this channel lately putting forward anti Royal sentiments,

[@jenniy7557]

@Sophie Mary You have a problem with a conversation about how powerful people get their money? I consider it a very important topic at a time when so much corruption is being exposed. Let’s see how you argue back about that.. it will say a lot about you.

[@Miracleedafiogho34]

Hi Carole how are you doing?

[@carolefearnley1990]

@@jenniy7557 I wasn't questioning that but to balance any books you need to see out put and input,they could've done that,and as your anti Royal why are you here?

[@vipiccb6896]

@@jenniy7557 you have a problem with basic facts! All you do is lie and spread hate!

[@vipiccb6896]

@@jenniy7557 "Let’s see how you argue back about that.. it will say a lot about you" Just like you, who runs away and can't support anything you say! YOU are NOT British, so have no right to comment

[@wolfblitzer1981]

Long live the glorious majesty of rathin Island and surrounding areas 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@jeffowens8664]

I pray she lives forever 🙏 she’s the best

[@jeffowens8664]

Well hope you’re having fun over there?

[@pal7252]

I strongly believe that monies are return via tourism. Keeping maintenance to all the grounds can be quiet expensive. No different than what you do for your own property imagine historical properties.

[@dragosapina5692]

@@therealsophiemary ohhh yes they dooo

[@dragosapina5692]

@@therealsophiemary yup

[@vipiccb6896]

@@dragosapina5692 more of your lies

[@dragosapina5692]

@@therealsophiemary Sophie it doesn't take much. The sovereign grant has been in the news. It is a matter of point of view to a degree with those supporting the RF refering to the SG as crown estates and interpting it as somehow an indication that it belongs to the queen. It doesnt. It is public property. "Crown Eststes" would be referred to as something else in countries that are not a monarchy. They are the property of the commonwealth in other commonwealth countries - some of them, Im not sure about Canada as they seem particularly determined to distance themselves from any suggestion that the RF has a role to play in public administration. The RF dont work. They publish their official diaries on the roysls website, although these are exeedingly hard to navigate and you have to do a lot of work to actulally work out what they did. Nonetheless, it seems that eithe Charles or Anne are the hardest working royals, with Charles putting in 500 hours of royal duties in 2019. Most of these lasted less than an hour and involved personal interests. When the queen was sick, it was revealed that one of her "official duties" involved watching a horse race, on television, in which her horse was running. Really? Kate and William were the laziest of the senior royals with K working 3.5 weeks in a year. Again "work" is used loosley. You can find this info - look up the republican movment. However, it is all academic as the royals do not engage in anything essential or necessary. It is a con designed to imply that they have a function. They are an undemocratic institution who have no role in a democracy. None. The real work of the state is done by public servants and elected officials. In what context is it reasonable to assume that people should be granted executive power based on nothing other than the fact that they were born. You too were born and have as many qualifications required to be a duke, duchesses, queen or any other made up title they give themselves. It doesnt even matter what they do or dont do. It simply makes no real difference because they contribute nothing meaningful ( they get paid for charity work, for crying out loud). They are an offence to notions of fairness, equality and merit and are a ridiculous waste of resources which could be directed elsewhere. Im happy for them to pretend they are "royals" and go about having people curtsy to them. Makes no difference what they want to pretend to themselves, but do it in your own time and not at the expense of the taxpayer

[@dragosapina5692]

@@therealsophiemary No, thats not correct - but given the unreasonable deference Betty Windsor has been shown ( since just after the second election of Churchill) it wouldn't surprise me if a popularity minded govt made a deal with her. There is no denying her popularity (even with me, to a certian extent) and it would be a brave govt indeed that would be willing to work against her interest. The monarchy is distinct from Betty. Shes just a woman. Crown property is not the property of her family. The dissatisfaction with the royals is growing and if under 30s had their way there would be no queen today. It is a growing trend which is not likely to be reversed with the ascension of Charles. The monarchy is on its last legs and there is no way the government that oversees their final demise will hand over substantial holdings - including a significant part of the coast line - to private individuals. The only reason Crown assets are codified in the way they are is because the UK is a constitutional monarchy. The real monarch is irrelevant and the crown estates do not belong to the Windsor family. They are the beneficiaries of them due to an antiquated system which was under threat immediately after the 2nd WW, (when disatisfaction with the monarchy was higher than it is even today) but which was preserved for political reasons. It is quite arbitrary. The fact is that the RF will not exist in 30 years maybe 20 or sooner. Id like to think that they have less than a decade in them, but that might be wishful thinking on my behalf. In any case, when they go, they will not be taking the crown estates with them and they might even be stripped of other assets if it is deemed that they aquired them as a result of their constitutional status. If things become crazier - which I doubt, but the world seems insane at present - it is possible that there might be punative measures taken against the RF (as there have been in other jurisdictions) when they are shown the door. I have no idea, of course, but the royals have already been squirreling money where it cant be found, and I would not be surprised if there is not an exodus of the Windsor family from the UK once it becomes obvious that the inevitable is around the corner. The crown is a constitutional concept. The Windsors do not own the estates gained by previous periods of acquisition. The means by which they are compensated for a deal between parliment and George III is antiquated and a joke. Not only that, but Betty Windsor is not a queen in the sense that it applied in antiquity. She has none of the powers, cant raise an amarda or impose her will - without corruption - on the people. The sovereign grant is a grift by a family motivated by their own self interests. The money is not theirs

[@angrykid7002]

From the taxpayers

[@onekie5787]

go cry about ur £1.29

[@Tractionengine_556]

Angrykid700 Would you like us to set up a Go Fund Me page so you can be reimbursed for the £1.29, that' you pay (assuming you're a UK taxpayer) once a year?

[@angrykid7002]

@@Tractionengine_556 they should set up a go fund me for Diana’s family after what they did to her

[@Tractionengine_556]

@@angrykid7002 And what did they do to Diana?

[@angrykid7002]

@@Tractionengine_556 you know what happened they sent paparazzi to harrass her which resulted in her being killed and did you know Charles divorced Diana in 1996 ain’t it strange how if he divorced he couldn’t be king somehow a year later it was an ‘accident’ this ‘royal family’ have blood on their hands.

[@GeordiePat1]

The Queen and some members of her Family, ie: Duke and Duchess of Wessex, The Princess Royal , Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, and Prince Charles, and the Duchess of Cornwall all work representing The Queen. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth deserves all the Government via the British People give to help her do her duty and serve her people. Thank you again your Majesty for all you have done as Queen of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth.🥰🙏🌹🌹🌹

[@dragosapina5692]

How does the queen serve anyone?

[@dragosapina5692]

But her majesty is not even a real queen and she certainly doesn't work. Neither does the Count of Monte Cristo, the Hatchback of Notre Dame or any if the other fictional characters you refer to. Particularly the Duckeggs of Cadbury

[@Chipoo88]

To get a better understanding though one would need to understand how the duchies work as well as their origins

[@dragosapina5692]

They work exactly like feudalism. The duchies are private businesses when it suits the royals and public property when that suits the royals. But they too are theft

[@arussujawal2373]

Really a great and rich family of the world !

[@queenelizabeth2dn564]

God save the queen Elizabeth

[@Aravind-sh8uq]

80% from India 👍 The great Looters of the world channel 😂😂😂

[@maranatha8768]

Same as ours from the people.

[@susankay497]

What/ Are there no moderators on this channel???

[@DANSHHD]

That there is no tax word, since the royal family actually lives on its own money from the crown fund, which was established to protect the royal jewels, and by the way, the fund is partly controlled by the queen, since she renews the contract every year. And by the way, ate 2 you can’t pay less than the fund earns, even if the fund’s profit falls, the amount will be the same

[@tarny11]

Where properties and investment are included in the Duchy of Cornwall and Lancaster

[@stevenk7965]

Money is an issue that everyone has for a better and luxurious life was hard for me until I started trading Bitcoin and am now earning $ 18,435 per week

[@theresa.m9849]

Same here, There's no doubt Crypto investment is the key to future wealth, with my current profit of $59,000 made from my investment with Mr Dave Javens trading platform I'm totally convinced, Dave is the best trading broker I have worked with and his strategies are so easy to adapt, He’s such a blessing to me especially in this current dip

[@aaronhdallen6971]

I have also been trading with Dave , the profits are secured and over a 100% return on investment directly sent to your wallet.

[@jonassturluson5273]

I have been investing in crypto but have had a bumpy ride. How can I reach your broker? I will appreciate any tip or pointers

[@charlesthomas2735]

I once tried trading myself but made more losses than profits. I wouldn't suggest it to anyone

[@thomassterne599]

Who's he and how do l contact him directly?

[@Fim_Jinnie]

Sec

[@keithfraser7845]

This seemed to be pretty inaccurate, the Crown Estate pays for a large bulk of the expenses. Where does money for the Sovereign Grant come from? The payment is based on the profits of the Crown Estate, a property business owned by the monarch but run independently.

[@zoomzoom885]

These people who moan on about polluting at air cuz of the planes they need to think twice cuz how do they get to go on their holidays if they don’t like polluting the air? How do they drive around cars pollute the air too,so do busses trains. The queen looks so lovely in her mild yrs now and she still manages to smile. Catherine so stunning too she buys most of her dresses herself she had a good wage before getting with William,she even bought her own wedding dress.love the Cambridge’s they will make excellent king and queen consort

[@topazlake85]

Long live the Queen! Be happy you have one. Republic are much more costly and in addition you have a hussle of electing a strange, dumb president every 5 years.

[@danielwallace8668]

Interesting that the duchy of Cornwall (the heirs private income) is more than the duchy of Lancaster (the sovereigns private income).

[@DANSHHD]

this has been the case since ancient times, since Elizabeth has money from royal ascot races, etc., and also a personal investment account, which is confidential, but according to estimates, somewhere around £ 300 million and brings in £ 40 million, this was calculated by Forbes according to assumptions

[@theoisaac9948]

👍👍

[@Neptune44u6k6]

🙏👑🙏

[@krmyna1]

I do not imagine. Please, from where?.

[@roydimanalata8505]

God saves queen

[@luilu9233]

LONG LIVE THE QUEEN

[@virginiasykesrnbsn638]

And how much did they bring in?

[@Ater_Draco]

Several billion as usual, of course. A few more billion this year because of the Jubilee

[@ekmaneeganon6220]

ทรงพระ เจริญ วรกาย แข็ง แรง ทุก องค์ ขอบพระ ทัยกระหม่อม .....EKARIN KALJAN .....THAILAND ....

[@nabeelmajeed4815]

I can't wait for Queen Elizabeth 2 to put a good King on the throne. 😃

[@ameliarannestiggins2345]

@Nabeel majeed You're a fool.

[@shrey2560]

yes cant wait william to be a king😄

[@suej9329]

@@shrey2560 Charles’s reign should be relatively short, then William’s turn will come.

[@vipiccb6896]

@@shrey2560 why? YOU are NOT British

[@vipiccb6896]

@@shrey2560 YOU have been PROVEN to be a liar and racist

[@slmanbadr6832]

SO WE PAY TAX AND THEY TRAVEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@slmanbadr6832]

@@therealsophiemary yes i did lassy

[@momomolina6622]

Good morning Family’s Royal y’all looks Beautiful more Beautiful love y’all 💙❤️✨💫🥰✍️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🥰🌸🌸🥰🌸✨😘😘😘💫

[@Leviathan-xy4bm]

Best mates of Savile and co

[@comet1227]

I guess you must have been as well since you would know this?

[@vipiccb6896]

are you?

[@comet1227]

How many times are you going to change your picture and account name "Matthew"from (Islas Malvinas)?

[@lionessofafrica7051]

Africa

[@Neptune44u6k6]

❤️

[@joyandsa6084]

They give back to British people. If HM Queen bring Rs. 100 so she only takes Rs. 12. British Empire should rais again. It's a times demand. Long live the Queen 👑🇬🇧✝️💖

[@shrey2560]

are you Indian?

[@joyandsa6084]

@@shrey2560 Yes wb

[@shrey2560]

@@joyandsa6084 ok and what wb?

[@joyandsa6084]

@@shrey2560 hey man I have asked you? Infact I have given your answer.

[@shrey2560]

@@joyandsa6084 actually i am asking the meaning of 'wb'

[@thamizh..pixaal2927]

British is rich... Because of india... 👍

[@vipiccb6896]

nope, India is rich because of the UK

[@musakazem7230]

God is the Rich, the Praiseworthy ........Allah Et lorsque votre Seigneur proclama: «Si vous êtes reconnaissants, très certainement J'augmenterai [Mes bienfaits] pour vous. Mais si vous êtes ingrats, Mon châtiment sera terrible».

[@archimedes3518]

Кто-то любит свежий ветер, Кто-то мягкий каравай, Кто-то ребусы в газете, Мне же - деньги подавай. Я, признаться по секрету, Очень денежки люблю. Ничего приятней нету, Чем копить их по рублю. И шагаю с этой ношей Я по жизни, весь звеня. Вот какой я нехороший, Полюбуйтесь на меня!

[@daviniarobbins9298]

And briefcases full of money from rich Saudi business men and royals too. I bet that happens all the time and the one Charles received was leaked.

[@rajat6736]

Money doesn't matter

[@jacobstopper3804]

First

[@I.C.T]

جيد لو أراد الجمهور مال و بيت من (الساده البريطانيين)في غضون 120 دقيقة

[@marimini7585]

💞💞

[@sandradiana5312]

There is a thief around there they don't work just sit around they do fokkol

[@bakedbeans5494]

Coming from the woman who is complaining on a payed off phone.

[@minnie8397]

Where do they get money? Insider trading

[@aerialpyropewpew]

Um, no.

[@karen64watson.]

From your pockets and their lands , their properties and goodies .

[@bayousbambino427]

Do explain what the Royal Family takes from your pockets.

[@richardanthonygilbey]

They don’t I already tribally removed it, so the Windsor’s will never spread their wings.

[@vipiccb6896]

troll

[@thomasmorin749]

Ask Charles. He accepts bags of cash.

[@Ater_Draco]

If you were British you'd know that went to the Prince's Trust, and was spent on services for children and young people. You'd also know there's a full independent investigation. Unlike the US where forner president accepted cash and electoral assistance for personal gain from dictatorships like Russia, China, Saudi and N Korea, without any repercussions

[@aerialpyropewpew]

@@vipiccb6896.. Look it up on the internet. It's well known where that money went.

[@jenniy7557]

@ AerialPyro Yes, because everything on the highly censored “internet” is accurate.🤣

[@vipiccb6896]

@@jenniy7557 to quote YOU from yesterday "just research, but don't use google and all the information is straight in front of you" Weird how you change your position each day

[@user-fw9ir4vi5k]

Put down a lot of korean and world's stock. And then d'ont raise it up~~!! I's right~!! 🐢......,

[@andrealuisecandido1154]

and ThaTs The ReaSon why i get no money of UK because am no Family member was no

[@christinesmith7505]

Certainly NOT from Harry & Meghan.

[@steven.events]

They're Mountbattens.

[@sophiegunner1754]

They got it from robbery

[@Hopefully.2024]

No, they only take money.

[@vipiccb6896]

@@sophiegunner1754 yes, Me-gain is a gold digger

[@sophiegunner1754]

@@vipiccb6896 wow you’re still here. No not from Meghan. But definitely from you and your mother

[@whathandleUtalkabt]

Aww that's one suitcase for Charles.

[@Tractionengine_556]

Old news.

[@Ater_Draco]

* one suitcase that benefited the children and young adults supported by the Prince's Trust. Makes a change from you whining about walking though. Well done you 👏

[@jenniy7557]

Cash is always suspect. Hush money for something nefarious.

[@Ater_Draco]

@@jenniy7557 exactly. Just like the money your last president took from countries like China, Saudi, Turkey and Russia. Or your current president has had from Ukraine. Although, your presidents used that money for their own enrichment, whereas the money linked to Charles was given to his charity for children and young adults, so at least there was no personal gain, and thousands of kids across the countries of the UK benefited

[@Sotto_]

@@jenniy7557 Chidren's charities are nefarious? Mmmm-kay. I can clearly see what your world vision is.

[@djtomoy]

THE POOR PEOPLE OF GREAT BRITAIN!!!!!

[@PradhanAlok]

By reserve that looted from whole world e.g 44 trillion dollars from India and rest of countries 😂 best representation that diamond in that crown of old lady

[@hlondon24O8]

What diamond would that be in the that crown of old lady?

[@taxiarches-holyarchangelsm8655]

+++

[@jehovahhohenzollern3329]

*GERMAN ROYAL FAMILY: Transparency Laws makes it noticeable Wars & Military of England the U.K. and U.S.A. France Germany are funded and insured by the U.N. or NATO except Royals who are funded and insured by China. ― King of Barbarossa U.S.A. and 1888 Royal Continental and National King of Prussia Frederick I​​​*

[@kencoleman5007]

In some ways, it's less spiteful the taxation in the US. The further left wing a politician is more positioned, the more that the rely on the wealthy to train their voters' collective animus on. But they rely even more on this class of people who they (often) publically malign because those are the most significant individual tax benefactors foreclosures grand federal ideas which would channel there money in a direction more exclusively beneficial (in the most direct sense) to people contributing far less to the federal budget. Even then, people demand more, and more, and more of the government in subjective spending without having any pragmatic idea of how to lower the national debt. Other than more steeply increasing the taxes on those who they increasingly vilify, yet wouldn't want those individuals individuals moving to other countries.

[@Ater_Draco]

What does any of that have to do with the RF or UK? You don't even have a political left in the US. You have a two party state, which would go down like a bucket of cold sick within our democracy. Plus, both of your political parties are right wing, with one being more slightly centrist than the other. The US doesn't have the political spectrum of the UK or other developed countries around the planet. The political centre and left in the UK have always been the parties of the working people. The right wing are the parties of the rich elite. You are comparing apple and aardvarks when comparing USian politics with our country

[@kencoleman5007]

@@Ater_Draco This has to do with the RF (through this video) because royal income & spending (in the UK, not in the UAE or kingdoms where there's more money and opulence) is often subject to criticism by political pundits. In the US, it's one of the main talking points when increasingly vitriolic people try politicizing every action of the royal family. Even the most anti-RF Americans were buzzing about Harry's wedding. The bride didn't need to be Meghan. The Bride could've been an promiscuous over-the-hill show girl that he met in Vegas, but what mattered to them was that was marrying an iconoclast with Black geneaology. Unfortunately, whether they intended it or not, Harry's marriage was spoken of, criticized, defended, and championed not do much as a union of two kindred spirits as a contract of social political diplomacy (something more like royal weddings from centuries ago).

[@dragosapina5692]

What? What have left wing politicians got to do with the fact that these people who are without accomplishment or qualifications of any type, and who dont work in any real sense of the word assume their lives of fabulous luxury should be supported by others. Where dud you get the notion that anyone is demanding more and more of the royals? It is the royals the royals who demand mire and more without making a contribution of any type. Even when the queen announced, magnanimously, that she was willing to pay taxes (something from which she had been exempt - so much fir making a contribution ), she was caught hiding her true earnings in an offshore account (remember the Paradise Papers) of the type used by some of the most unsavoury characters imaginable, including other corrupt royals. I dont quite understand the logic of your whole statement, but it is clear that the RF are the largest welfare recipients in the UK, if not the world. In other jurisdictions still anachronistic enough to have a RF, the cost of supporting such an institution is a fraction of that in the UK. Why? What needs do these individually wealthy parasites who are nonetheless willing to put their hands out, without embarrassment, for a handout have. Do they eat gold? They serve no function, have no jobs, and contribute nothing. Even according the most rationalist laissez-faire view of the world, they represent unjustifiable privilege and waste.

[@Miracleedafiogho34]

Hello Ken you're looking beautiful

[@commguide2157]

@@Miracleedafiogho34 Flagged for Harassment or bullying

[@Barbara-pr1ui]

With all that money..you would think they would give some to Harry. They should treat each other better. Bless the queen and the entire royal family 💖💖

[@Ater_Draco]

Harry is not a senior working royal so ineligible for money from the Sovereign grant, and indicated his wish to be financially independent from the RF.

[@vipiccb6896]

Barbara why would they give money to someone who has lied and attacked them, then left the country for money?

[@christophaltmann8711]

You forgot the suitcase full of cash from Qatar.

[@Hopefully.2024]

You mean the donations to the Prince's Trust?