RS3 vs. M240i vs. Golf 8 R🏁 | 0-100 km/h & 100-200 km/h acceleration🤜🤛 | by Automann

[@danielainger8666]

Golf R definitely has more power then VW are saying but man that Audi is a beast.

[@82Heizer]

Golf R on Dyno =345HP, Car was standard

[@cosmic_gate476]

So does the m240i lol

[@ExtremeDeathman]

@@82Heizer links or it didn't happen

[@82Heizer]

@@ExtremeDeathman dont cry Susan 😂 kzbin.info/www/bejne/nHuYo6B_mK91f7s Sorry....340HP

[@the_batmobile0.4]

@@ExtremeDeathman so now what?

[@dfischer1980]

I think the 100-200 time for the m240i could be better when starting acceleration a bit earlier than 95... 🙂

[@movsar93mn]

Es misst erst ab 100. Läuft nach GPS

[@dfischer1980]

@@movsar93mn it is a difference to start from 80. Only with starting at lower speed the engine can create the complete boost.

[@tunavis77]

I agree 100%

[@_Ambition124]

Rs3 in better conditions and with performance summer tires will be a lot better 0-100 and 100-200

[@MarcSob22]

You did not pull correctly the BMW on the 100-200! You need to start pull way before the 100 like the other two so the engine can be on the right rpm

[@M21KEY]

agreed, started both R and RS3 at 70kmh but the M240i at 97kmh.. also where’s the S3 , A35 and A45S at in this video

[@Automann-TV]

Of course also the M240i was started at around 85 when doing the 100-200, same as for the other cars. It’s just cut off in this clip

[@bartbart6545]

@@Automann-TV but audi eas not...why did u cut bmw only then?

[@purgex861]

@@Automann-TV cut off? The sequence starts at 93km/h hearing your foot hitting the kick down, so yea..

[@McBeamer94]

The RS3 and the M240i sound wonderful. Wish all small cars had such engines and such engine sounds. The Inline-4 is banal, boring and colourless.

[@ricola1759]

If it was a 6 cylinder it would cost as much as the bmw

[@cosmic_gate476]

Inline 4 cylinders are so bad companies are using fake sound inside lmao. The new Mercedes c63 is gonna be huge flop with its fucking 4 cylinder lmao

[@ricola1759]

@@cosmic_gate476 Not so much that they're bad but its hard to have engine sound enter the cabin when they have isolate road noise.

[@PapiAndrey]

@@cosmic_gate476 disagree, the current CLA45 amg sounds damn good with an exhaust. Not all 4 bangers sound bad. You can make many sound good with the right exhaust, not all though. And many of them sound better when they aren’t loud. CLA45 just sounds different in general, it doesn’t sound like every other 4 cylinder

[@justanotherguy972]

@@PapiAndrey No way mate, had an A45s and got rid of it because it sounded shite

[@PolbeRacing]

Considering, that this is "only" the M240i, I am not sure if I am prepared for the upcoming M2 and maybe also M2 Competition, if they do it like they did with the current M3/M4. Even when they release it 2 years later, I think it will destroy everything in this class

[@hendo-741]

I just picked up a 22 M240, and timed a 0-60 at 3.88 sec. 3.68 with 1 ft rollout using a dragy. I agree that the LC didn't function correctly during your test.

[@elikabak7044]

did you order yours? how long did you wait? trying to be patient lol

[@PQV-8898]

Congrats the new M240 is such a beautiful vehicle with a monstrous performance to boot.

[@hendo-741]

@@elikabak7044 nah, found one in transit to a dealership and flew to pick it up upon delivery.

[@fullthrill7314]

Do you like the exhaust sound, or is it too quiet?

[@hendo-741]

@@fullthrill7314 I do like the sound of a straight 6, but yes it is quiet. BMW should eventually offer a M Performace exhaust option.

[@UturbionyTV]

Audi RS3 8Y it's the king hot hatch 💪

[@f2LTurboski]

Imagine what the bmw M2 will be !

[@chrisincamera]

Am I missing something but shouldnt an M240i and Golf R be matched against a S3 not an RS3 ?

[@bryangoh819]

I would love to see the 0-100 kmh and 100-200 kmh acceleration times for the new RS 3 in a much favourable and ideal conditions. 😉

[@Automann-TV]

Mee too! But winter time😭

[@salvors125]

@@Automann-TV a video with audi 40 tfsi e vs 45 tfsi e . And a video with S3 vs 45 tfsi e ????

[@gerritroebkes895]

Golf 8R ist für die 2 Liter und 320 ps im Vergleich zum Bmw m240i echt ein Brett. Die Messungen 0-100/100-200 überragend, gegenüber was man eigentlich vom Bmw erwarten würde zu 3 Liter Hubraum und 374 ps.. Dazu der Golf mit Performance Paket fast 290 km/h schnell, diese auch auf’n Tachometer stehen und nicht wie beim bmw 260, dieser auch schon bei echten 243 km/h abriegelt.. Der Audi rs3 ist natürlich noch eine andere Nummer 💪👌

[@Niob2302]

Die 8R streuen aber eben auch alle derbe nach oben....da hat kein einziges Model nur 320 PS ;)

[@cgg9726]

Wenn ich das wieder lese.... Golf hat kleinere Felgen, keine 255/265 Schlappen auf HA und auch keine 200 kg Mehrgewicht, wie der BMW. Aber Gratulation. Wenn man keinerlei Ansprüche hat, dann findet man den Golf Klasse.

[@iki8785]

Man sollte auch nicht vergessen, dass VW und Audi sein stärkstes Pferd in diesem Segment zeigt, wobei BMW "nur" ein Zwischenmodell bringt.

[@cgg9726]

@@iki8785 verglichen mit dem m240i schickt VW den M3 unter den Golf ins Rennen....

[@thorben8170]

Außerdem, schaue mal auf die Tachometer beim Start. Der BMW hat da schon die schlechtesten Voraussetzungen, wenn ab 97 km/h der kickdown durchgeführt wird. Die anderen wurden viel früher beschleunigt.

[@keinelugen8828]

Bought a 2020 Golf TCR full Option ..... best car to have fun with driving skills 👌

[@Mike-jy6mf]

I think the M240 and RS3 are close enough where both will be enjoyable. The two things that would hold me back from picking the RS3 would be availability and price. I have a huge feeling these will be sold at above MSRP when they release in the US and factory orders will probably be non-existent since there is high demand for them. This is making me lean towards the more readily available and cheaper M240i.

[@savannahkorben7353]

yeah the new RS3 was my main choice for a new car but after looking into it, it'll be 2+ years before we see any of them in the states and they'll be coming over in small numbers, dealer markup will be insane and they'll be pushing 70k loaded to begin with. I ordered a M340i instead, just got finished with assembly

[@Mike-jy6mf]

@@savannahkorben7353 Congrats, I recently went with the M240i myself. Couldn't bother to wait for the bad news for the Audi. Who knows though, could be wrong. But I've read plenty of good things about the BMW so it was enough to get me to place an order for one.

[@spyder2001]

Dont care about the odd 100th of a second here and there. I'll take the 5Cyl Turbo every single time for the sound alone.

[@jackhowes2917]

The 240i can do 3.8 0-100 from other testers

[@dqpowered]

Same can be said about RS3. Better conditions and tires, you get 3.5 easily.

[@android175]

@@Scythersmile1 the AWD and more HP on the RS3 would probably make it a consistently faster car under broader conditions. Its not going to be picky to perform like the 240i

[@TheMCAids]

@@dqpowered that still isn't entirely impressive simce the RS3 is another level up from the 240. The M2 will be the comp for the RS3 and I don't think audi did enough to fend that off.

[@savannahkorben7353]

@@android175 loaded rs3 will be ~70k in the U.S, a loaded m240i is ~56k

[@TheEryk03]

Too much wheels spin for the RS3. On summer tires it would be much quicker.

[@Automann-TV]

Potentially yes!

[@synthwave7]

That Audi sounds the best !!!

[@ian2183]

I'll get the BMW any day of the week 😆

[@modelbehavior3252]

That RS3 dash/console/steering wheel look dramatically different than photos I’ve seen, it’s a 2022 model?

[@moonrunnerlife1640]

What's funny is this guy is the whole reason I bought an Audi RS3

[@jordanmaleka9613]

Thanks automann big fan of the golf 8 r

[@Automann-TV]

Me too😃💪

[@robertderboss9471]

I'm a very big fan of the Golf 8 r too, does anybody know if there's a 20 th anyversary of the golf planed with more horsepower?

[@iTophh]

Golf R sounds like my dyson. Nice.

[@tarekjarjour1101]

Un fair test for the BMW M240i on both 0-100 as lunch control was not active, and 100-200 while you started accelerating on both other cars from below 80kmh , you started on around almost 97kmh on the BMW, I hope this test is not intentionally unfair .

[@HR-tl5mq]

RS3, M240, Golf R.. in that order

[@davidoliver7977]

other you tubers have posted consistant sub 4 seconds for the M240i so I guess you didn't launch it properly

[@Automann-TV]

0-100 km/h with Rollout Off? We also tested 0-60 mph with 3.9 but that’s not the figure we want to compare.

[@jasonsaridis8864]

Great review in Australia the rs3 and the 240i are about the same price while the golf is about 25 percent cheaper. Which car would be the best car as a daily driver that is also fun to drive. I love the performance of the rs3. Thanks again for your review.

[@MrRonan3]

The problem with the Golf R in Australia it is detuned all of the time.all 3 Mk 6 7 and 8. but owning them in the past so easy to remap.now VW have put a stop to that. so i would not choose the Golf anymore,

[@Ok-xe4pr]

Make a test drive with all of them.

[@ThenameisOskar]

The Golf 8 R is something else. The gap between the older Rs3 and Golf R was way bigger.

[@dimmacommunication]

There's a guy here in Italy that has all sort of supercars but love the 8r. That says a lot.

[@savannahkorben7353]

@@dimmacommunication probably loves how much of a sleeper it is, if he owns a bunch of flashy supercars that sort of thing will carry more weight

[@dimmacommunication]

@@savannahkorben7353 Well it's not a sleeper here , it's still a 70k car here in Europe . Nobody will think you are poor... 😂😂😂 Gas i 9$ a gal , you need to be rich just to pay gas.

[@mehmedismail1517]

Rs3 the king audi ❤️

[@TheFunkyair]

Golf R is the king of value for performance

[@johnjerrehian4642]

Really like the RS3. Plus, a basic tune really wakes this car up.

[@petermeister7191]

Dear Automann: I´d say that press cars are always very much well prepared for tests and all kind of give-away-testings. Comparing Golfs 10.8s from 100-200 to the BMW´s 10.6 considering a 54hp and 80NM advantage towards the BMW may result in the question if the Golf is really stock...

[@xIcarus227]

That does seem to be the case, and it's easy to check. If you search through videos of press Golf Rs and compare them to customer Golf Rs there's a noticeable difference in performance. For example: Press car: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJLPdoR9qtein68 (12.3s quarter mile) Consumer car: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnbYmoqZi7J1d68 (12.7s quarter mile) I would understand a difference of 0.1 or maybe 0.2 with big indulgence, but 0.4s is a significant difference. For reference, carwow got 12.1s in the way more powerful A45s. Cheating is becoming VW's second nature it seems.

[@emiliospowerballer1441]

@@xIcarus227 I don't think so. Consumers can actually buy the options they want for their car to be faster, just as companies like carwow demand specific options for their racing. Your self can do that. The GTI Clubsport actually has options of semi slicks in my country. There is no ideal or real world. The customer chooses the cars options as he wishes. Nothing stops customers from buying semi slicks, or optional performance packages. I would certainly buy that combo.

[@xIcarus227]

@@emiliospowerballer1441 semi-slicks won't account for a 0.4s difference in the quarter mile on an AWD car with a good launch control, that's just impossible. It's pretty obvious that the press cars had way more power than the 320-350HP found in the normal version of the Golf R. The time suggests more like 380.

[@emiliospowerballer1441]

@@xIcarus227 The tires pretty much can make the difference. To begin, I just find it highly unlikely that some individual specifically ordered a more tuned version of a car while the rest of us didn't. Secondly, horsepower figures can be exact, but each car is different. Thirdly, manufacturers complain so much about tires, that they are willing to claim cheated Nurburgring lap times from others as it exactly happened between Porsche and Nissan, because Porsche got beaten. Tires play a major role, and a 0.5sec or less can easily be attributed to tires. Besides, the very same channel tested a Golf R with winter tires at 4.3sec. With so many car related channels, its impossible for VW to build a handful of tuned cars knowing they would actually lend them to youtubers to test them. Forthly, ALL manufacturers lie about performance times AND carbon emissions, VW is no different.

[@xIcarus227]

@@emiliospowerballer1441 once again, there's no way any semblance of a decent tire can make a 0.4s difference on an AWD car of this power compared to a top-end tire, period. It's just physically impossible to have that much slip on AWD unless you're using the shittiest tires known to man - which isn't the case, these cars come with good tires from factory. Furthermore, nobody 'ordered' a better tuned version, VW simply gave press cars more power. The blue Golf you see in this video is a press car, it isn't owned by anyone. Secondly yeah the same model can have differences from an exemplar to another, but not 40HP or greater as can be seen in this video. Every youtuber was dumbfounded by what times the press cars achieved with a supposed '320' HP. Now we're seeing that customer cars aren't achieving those numbers. Why are you even arguing about there being a difference anyway? I thought the tire made all the difference, this tells me you're not convinced about your own arguments. Thirdly, it's completely irrelevant how much manufacturers moan about tyres when it comes to lap times. We're discussing drag times, not circuit lap times. That's got its own problems where the likes of Audi think they can shoot the RS3 off the Nurburgring with a pro driver onboard and claim a 'record' even though its direct competitors had their laptimes set by press drivers which don't drive nearly as good. Probably one of the reasons the Civic Type-R held the record for a time too. Fourth no other manufacturer that I know of gave press cars more power. And even if they did, it doesn't make it alright so VW still doesn't get a pass. Evidence points to the fact that VW cheated to look better, just like they did with the emissions. Deal with it. Do we know for certain? No, but evidence points towards it. Nobody dynoed the press cars and now they aren't evidently available anymore - not with the original tunes anyway.

[@spinningiswinning3563]

Imagine the m2

[@nurnberg1561]

Love the R8 interior

[@ballathug8404]

I feel like the BMW is faster than your times. I've seen it pull away from a golf r

[@dimmacommunication]

The 240i has almost the same 100-200 as an E92 m3 , almost same size ,almost same pricing, an inline 6 like a real m3 . Probably a more reliable engine and gearbox. Basically this is the car buy.

[@shahidrainudeen225]

I have noticed that you can launch a car in the quickest time ever.please launch Audi R8 performance in the best time for 0-100 and and 1/4 mile time

[@JP-wl5vj]

The M2401 X Drive is what the Audi Quattro concept car should have always been

[@Flexus83]

Immer wieder lustig dich in Hannover rumfahren zu sehen. 👍🏻

[@MCXpress]

Damn, channel that uses blinkers properly on a PUBLIC road. Subbed.

[@christianolsen9781]

That RS steering wheel is my favorite wheel ever with start and drivemode buttons on the wheel.

[@Clayspeed]

Good numbers. No fudging and honest. Keep up the good work!

[@janneshildebrandt1]

Which one feels the loudest from the outside?

[@SansuiAUX901]

deswegen habe ich bei meinem RS 3 (2018) ne Stage 1 aufspielen lassen und jetzt macht er 8s von 100-200 :-)

[@Mike-rv1yd]

why do you accelerate the 240i 100-200 from 95 and the others much earlier, I think the Audi and golf get more momentum

[@gati54uri094]

The Golf R is the best for me, rs3 si better on the launch but the 4 cil revs better and the perfect sounding for the shifts, well the 240i instead of the six cilinder is the best acceleration but finally I prefer the golf R

[@wurf5336]

Would you buy rs3 2020 over bmw m240 2022 ?

[@atalayo3o0o]

Since this is a great content, could you trry split screening cars, and sync them on start to watch em all go at the same time from 0-100 ??? Could be great to see them go at the same time.

[@Bigguns761]

M240I xdrive with properly done lauch control is 4 sec flat. I know I have one lol. U did it wrong. if it's not telling you launch control activated ...then it's not activated. and it makes a big difference on the 0-100

[@ReconRangersPasukanKhusus]

The Golf 8 R as a daily rider and in the weekends as an awesome driverscar. And you safe a lot of money (with the purchase, insurance & consumption) compared to the RS3.😉

[@alexion7160]

not sure why but for the bmw he started the 100-200 at 93kmh , which gave it a huge disadvantage. the golf r he started it at 60kmh

[@gaelou15]

Great video ! thank you. Please, can we know the brand and model of your gloves that look awesome?

[@onderyetiskin]

you made mistake when you launch bmw 240i. this car has electric engine if you not choose launch control this electric engine still there and slower. its for comfort. and i tested if start with launch control you will be go 3.9 second also i got 4.9 second with 230i bmw. and price more more cheaper than golf R. just guy consider before decided!

[@DerdaAnna]

Absolutely agree !

[@abdullaasani3910]

Respect golf R

[@FFFFFfffjjkkc]

Hatte selber getestet hatte denn m240i für 2 tage. 100-200 zeit war 10.2 Bitte 240i nicht falsch einschätzen der geht ziemlich gut trotz das er mit 1780 kg ziemlich schwer ist :)

[@gerritroebkes895]

Mega Vergleich 💪👌

[@bloffama]

Wow Golf 8R has only 320cv and goes so fast 🤯

[@performancecars4835]

350hp Dyno. so it is as fast as the old M140i with 350hp again on dyno

[@trader2473]

@@performancecars4835 you're right with 350-ish, but RS3 in real world have like 430-440hp, so numbers from Golf R are simply amazing! And for my taste it look the best when it have performance pack! 🍻

[@luciussander8217]

@@performancecars4835 Really? Mate of mine had his 8R dyno'd and then remapped... 322bhp stock. Funny that.

[@performancecars4835]

@@luciussander8217 there are some that made 340-350 Stock. The 7.5R with 310hp are making 100-200 in 12.+ sec

[@luciussander8217]

@@performancecars4835 'Some' tuner who mapped my mates said he's yet to see an 8R with more than 325bhp. These are customer cars - not the cars the journo's had. Like I said, funny that.

[@zafer7368]

Can't wait for the m2 if the m240i can do that

[@llcars]

Rs3 😎👍

[@spookyreaper1702]

Wow this vid made my Sunday 🥳🥳RS3 is my fav car 🥵

[@highlineR32]

Was the M240i with xDrive or only RWD? Thx

[@user-np5qu9ph1t]

Always AUDI 😆

[@Evlengr]

Doing part of your review in another Audi may be confusing to other readers. I looked at all 3 of these cars. I have owned a MK6 Golf R, a 2017 Audi S3, and now due to a number of shortcomings on the RS3 a BMW 240i. Audi is dragging their feet on the US release and the stupid "Chicken Nugget" type shifter was a deal breaker for me. I cant see fiddling with that while trying to park or back out of a space quickly. That and the phony plastic rear facia. It is nice to see that I feel I made the right choice after seeing your reviews.

[@number1Schumacherfan]

It’s funny that the base M240 is competitive with the RS Audi. Not only are you not comparing the M2 but the RS3 should compete against the eventual M2CS. BMW wins

[@carinafarnschlader3798]

🙂 Ich wünsche einen schönen 3. Advent.

[@Automann-TV]

Danke! Ebenso😀

[@user-gw7bb5md7l]

Rs3 incredible cars

[@gooo1762]

Thanks for the video!

[@1bojanbojan]

0-100 with or without 1ft rollout? Can you do 0-60 with and without 1ft rollout on R? Thank you

[@NAZTYPONY007]

thats with no rollout ...its about .2-.3 qiucker with rollout like when matt watson does his tests....

[@PapiAndrey]

@@NAZTYPONY007 ^^

[@SpeedforceM3competition]

BMW’s are notorious fir understating their power.. they are meant to be faster in real life than on paper

[@richardfrench2637]

How did carwow manage just over 4 seconds when they tested the Golf R 🤔

[@Automann-TV]

0-60 mph time with drag race setting🤷‍♂️

[@richardfrench2637]

@@Automann-TV i have a Golf on order, they are awesome 😎

[@stevehuk902]

@@richardfrench2637 same but the wait is so long. I'm being told late spring early summer 😭

[@NAZTYPONY007]

@@Automann-TV you mean 1 foot rollout right !!!

[@germanengineering204]

@@stevehuk902 yikes that's a rough wait to say the least!

[@janneshildebrandt1]

Which one is loudest on the inside?

[@TGV1337]

The one with the loudest sound actuator.

[@aziaev]

Audi has best sound in this trio. BMW is second, and I have nothing to say about vacuum cleaner sound of four cylinders.

[@Nik-he9cg]

Hallo Automann-TV, ich hab gesehen, dass Sie in der Umgebung von Wolfenbüttel fahren, könnte ich eventuell mal bei einer fahrt dabei sein?^^ das wäre ein Träumchen

[@Alex161rnd]

💪RS сила! Quattro power!

[@gtlukas1493]

Sound: M240i Speed: RS3 Looks: M240i Winner: M240i (My opinion)

[@eddiee2750]

BMW would have definitely been much faster with a proper launch.

[@_Ambition124]

Same can be said with the rs3... winter tires + tire spin and not so ideal conditions. Summer tires = better 0-100 and 100-200 for sure. When My 2019 rs3 was stock, I was always able to get a 3.5-3.6 0-100 consistently so I reckon this can do atleast 3.3-3.4 in perfect conditions

[@eddiee2750]

@@_Ambition124 Absolutely. In another review in perfect conditions they got a 3.65 0-60 on the Audi. Just saying it would be more accurate in proper launch mode. Either way for me in the US we cannot even buy this one so I did get the M240 and living in cold climate the remote start is a really big deal.

[@rasikpanchani]

Definitely have to agree with this. Some people have gotten a 3.6 0-60 time in the bmw

[@eddiee2750]

Either way I think it’s incredibly impressive the times they are getting out of all of these cars. You think about what you had to spend say 10 years ago to achieve these times.

[@savannahkorben7353]

@@_Ambition124 it's not a conditions thing with the bmw, it literally didn't function correctly on the launch control... can get sub 4 seconds with it

[@fullthrill7314]

I’m trying to decide between the 2022 m240i and 2022 RS3. Will the rs3 sound better? I’m concerned that the m240i may sound too tame/boring.

[@vroomgc]

RS3 is a better deeper sound than the M240i

[@fullthrill7314]

@@vroomgc thanks, that’s what I was hoping.

[@saigoneze4465]

i really love the Rs3 but i hate the dash how it displays the rpms going downwards instead of going up it's just odd but the new bmw and that rear wheel drive coupe experience nothing comes close you really feel as one with the car and the power

[@android175]

Fortunately the dash is customizable! And the RS3 has RWD mode.

[@tintin9757]

M240i looks sooo much better than the other 2

[@Codename.996]

Hallo, eine Frage: Geht mit dem OBDeleven meine Fahrzeuggarantie von VW verloren?

[@thorben8170]

Wieder mal wurde der BMW ab knapp unter 100km/h durchgetreten (97km/h), der Golf bei 87km/h und der RS3 bei um die 70km/h. Das ist dann schon schwer vergleichbar. Starte doch mit allen drei mal bei den gleichen Geschwindigkeiten.

[@Automann-TV]

Nope. Beim BMW ist nur der Cut des Clips. Hatte 87 km/h GPS und die 10.6 waren der beste Run aus 4 Läufen.

[@thorben8170]

@@Automann-TV dann ist der m240 kein wirklicher Fortschritt zum alten m240 und eher enttäuschend verglichen mit 26 PS weniger als der RS3

[@vagcrew6683]

@@thorben8170 M240i F22 fährt mittlere 11 Zeiten? Und da sollen 1 Sekunde kein Fortschritt sein, zu dem das Gewicht des G42 wesentlich höher ist mit 1730kg leer. Von der Leistung nehmen sich beide vielleicht +/- 20ps auf dem Prüfstand.

[@vollcare4076]

@@thorben8170 der alte M240 fuhr ca 11,2s als sdrive und knapp 12s als xdrive Daher sind die 10,8s vom neunen als xdrive und dem höheren Gewicht schon ein Fortschritt

[@thorben8170]

@@vollcare4076 das sind ganz andere Zeiten als ich kenne. Mein m140 fuhr eine 10,8-11,0.

[@LeontariF1]

The equivalent of the RS3 is BMW M3 not M240i. The Golf R is a lower range than those cars

[@goofiduck5414]

Are this corrected times?

[@shawndixon4536]

Now that we own 2018 RS3 that has been tuned to 450HP, we wouldn't go with anything else right now!

[@cd9097]

The Golf Sound... sweet... 😅

[@CJ3000]

RS3 naturally aspirated??

[@sophiawoods6748]

Brilliant channel.

[@salahkara516]

Can you try BMW M5 E60 V10 Max speed 🖤

[@spookyreaper1702]

I think it’s 305km/h

[@carcosaterp3393]

I’d expect the RS3 to be faster than the M240i because it’s a direct competitor to the M2, not the M240i. The S3 and the M240i are direct competitors to each other although it appears the RS3 will be faster than the G87 M2 due to the automatic trans and all wheel drive

[@vollcare4076]

M240 sits definitely above the S3, and is closer to the RS3 as to the S3

[@carcosaterp3393]

@@vollcare4076 I don’t see how. In the states, the RS3 and the M2 both have almost have the exact same starting MSRP of around 60K. The S3 starting MSRP is 45K and M240i is 48.5K. The M240i is roughly 11 to 12K cheaper than the RS3

[@vollcare4076]

@@carcosaterp3393 in Europe/Germany: S3 48,5k RS3 60k M240i 56k So the M240 is 8k more expensive as the S3, It also has ca 20% more hp (+60hp) 25% more torque, (+100Nm) and 50% more displacement and cylinder …even more as RS3 -> not the M240 but the M135i (F40) is the direct rival to the S3

[@KainSwiss]

RS 3 competition is 100% the Mercedes A45S, I would say also the BMW M2, Golf R no, and BMW 240i no also.

[@vollcare4076]

@@KainSwiss agree: RS3 & A45S are in same class M2 is a above these 2 (more sporty) M240 slightly below, but above S3 and Golf R

[@mohamadchaaban4116]

Which is better to go for… 2022 rs3 or 2018 rs3 stage 2 …… overall (cost,features,fun…)

[@NAZTYPONY007]

2022 Golf R JB4 ECU piggy back 50whp/50tq increase no other mods ...

[@TheKillabobb]

If u want straight line performance it doesnt matter. Audi didnt do anything to the engine itself with hardware.

[@dj331]

Shame The RS3 looks so cheap inside 🙁

[@alexion7160]

poor mans opinion . I bet you think Mercedes "looks" expensive inside , even though Mercedes has the worse build quality out of the 3 German brands . Go sit in a car and feel its build quality , fit and finish and tooling before making an assumption.

[@homiixide]

@@alexion7160 audi is literal trash. Plastic from volkswagen. Seethe and cope more

[@HARUNOZZ]

Audi🔥🔥

[@alexedward01]

This sends a wrong message. Not a good comparison - RS3 does not belong here, S3 does.

[@Undercover1987]

Agreed. He should at least point out that it belongs in a different category. And also mention that there is an m2 coming..

[@alexedward01]

@@Undercover1987 yep

[@jordanmaleka9613]

Thanks

[@JackGE]

Did I hear you say "naturally aspirated engine" for the RS3? Maybe I misheard, but it definitely isn't NA.

[@Famous_Flavours]

He said that about the R8 he was driving..

[@JackGE]

@@Famous_Flavours makes sense. Serves me right for working and watching a video at the same time, huh...

[@klausdieter37]

Kann man schon mit dem normalen 59.99 packet codieren

[@TapTwoCounterspell]

Can someone break down the results for me since I'm lazy AF

[@b58killu31]

Yea somethings wrong. My stock 2021 m240i xdrive did 0-60 in 4 flat

[@evaristocorripio5434]

The first golf R videos in the year they were very fast, 1/4mile in 12.3 in carwow videos, but now, since the customers have been getting their cars, now the time has dropped to 12.7, wonder if the first cars were faster for the car journalists haha, maybe a new run with a recent golf R would be cool to compare to your first tests. Another way to notice this, is in of the latest carwow videos comparing the new cupra leon to the golf R, on a rolling they were neck to neck, the golf being just marginally faster, but here a 10.8secs 100-200 says otherwise when compared to the mid 12s of the cupra, so probably customers golf R is around the high 11s which again is weird.

[@trader2473]

Nope, they are all the same, just depend on the condition of test, this on automan test are almost perfect condition, that is the reason why he have this time from 100-200kmh, car wow did two test, one 12.3 on 1/4, second was in bad condition 12.7 and from there they always put on screen 12.7 no metter is it faster or slower than 12.7.

[@evaristocorripio5434]

@@trader2473 if that was the case, the golf R should destroy the cupra even on a roll, 10.8 to 12.5 is a huge difference, but they were neck to neck, so it is weird.

[@trader2473]

@@evaristocorripio5434 so it does! Go look rolling races. In every condiotion it can destroy cupra. But maybe cupra can have better times in condition such like are this when Golf was tested.

[@evaristocorripio5434]

@@trader2473 maybe, on a roll they should be pretty similar because the cupra is lighter and only fwd so less drivetrain losses

[@trader2473]

@@evaristocorripio5434 yep, but engine is not the same, small amount of people knows that only engine in Golf 8 R is the ea888 evo4, and all others include, cupra, gti clubsport, audi s3 are the ea888 evo3b engines, so they dont have the same engines like before, that is the reason why golf smash all this things inside VAG grupation, bc Golf have newest engine, and its so effective that power newer drops under 300hp, while on those evo3 and evo 3b engines power drops to 260 270hp when you change gears! For comparison, A45s amg with 421hp when changing the gears power drops to like 310 320hp, that is also reason why Golf R with just 320hp have good result compared to a45s and RS3.

[@l2icksta]

Wheres the A45 S?

[@Automann-TV]

Next video!?😇

[@l2icksta]

@@Automann-TV Yes please! 👌