若爆发矛盾，牛津教授猜测惨烈程度，结局会让多数人想象不到！

[@pinkjiang8792]

你理解佛法就理解了这位教授在讲什么了。金钱有假实二義，就时间而言也有假实二義。谢谢你。你的采访我很喜欢。

[@jdsu7150]

采访人水平太差

[@謝利福-k6h]

“東風”吹送草木哀。“洪水”滔天逐日來。六根未淨隨波去。正果能修往天臺

[@austinteng1380]

這段好像沒提中美關係？ 他是猶太人，也許還要考量猶太及現代以色列文化去理解他的歷史觀。西方的歷史觀（ 猶太是其中不能忽視的一支）與中國的有很多本質的差異

[@pangjihu]

建議節目標題加上來賓名。 此集來賓為著名歷史學家Noah Harari,人類三部曲作者。

[@quanli4641]

😊😊😊😊😊😊

[@lazymanliu4592]

6:14的观点，让我立马想到的是《银河霸主饲养手记》描绘的纳米机械植入普世化

[@swallowjen]

Those two are not on the same level.

[@wendychan3242]

👍💖

[@josephlin8065]

Oxford professor, his name?

[@smithjerry470]

水平太差

[@larryli1432]

The interviewee should improve his English.

[@王世奇-e1e]

卜年16壽而康

[@jasonsung9261]

This is a strange interview. The interviewee was not properly introduced in the beginning, then audience was given a peculiar theory of mankind and history. Under this situation, the equally bewildered interviewer should ask the interviewee explain more, rather he bluntly ask what is the flaws of this theory. Obviously knowing the background of the interviewee, such an interview should not happen in the first place to embarrass both parties.

[@user-jyk951]

白色衣服配白色字幕，有點累眼

[@zhijunguo2914]

这主持人是谁？英文不太够用啊。 表达成问题。

[@chikeongtan]

所以他說他不知該如何反駁

[@johntang8310]

鬼扯

[@smithjerry470]

请这人上节目得多少钱

[@josephlin8065]

Sapiens: A Brief History of Mankind By Yuval Noah Havari

[@kaiwenhe5518]

包皮佬

[@周有興]

戰爭是無法想像的憨尻仔!

[@我的狗厲害了-r5z]

歷史就是簡化模糊變成謊話了