RUAF Plan MASSIVE Offensives | Kherson Heavily Bombared

[@mariosmarduch3590]

I like this channel short to the point. Military Summary also good but sometimes too long but both are excellent.

[@jonshive5482]

Right. Find myself skipping ahead on MS's labored speculations.

[@simonpriest4345]

Sorry they are all rubbish. There is no actual collapse, yet, contrary to what both MS and Weeb say. And anyway as a war of attrition frontline movements aren’t actually that important. And so we are left to interpret battlefield changes with the huge subjectivity that goes with it. It’s total guess work

[@kazuesan33]

I stopped watching MS some time ago, the guy is way too prone to hyperboles.

[@Kenyasmatatuculture]

I never rated weeb till.i understood this war..I do military for his intro only n leave.i hate his speculations

[@OXY187]

Military Summary channel is ok, but I feel like Dima is overexaggerating stuff. I am not gonna talk about the clickbait titles since they are just a way to make money, but nevertheless, he'd make the same video for a straight month and call it progress. He's also obsessed with NK Troops getting involved.

[@joaomiguelmoreira6363]

Babe wake up, Weeb just uploaded !!!

[@Frank-pc2rs]

It's just corny now man. It's something a 13 year old that wishes he had a girlfriend would say.

[@reggiep75]

*Yo momma.

[@borlongimtisso2358]

Yeah....

[@TangoDusche]

Greetings from Leipzig, Germany!

[@Bigliever]

Hi from Brussels

[@cbhlde]

Grüße aus Lübeck. :)

[@karimlerbheley8553]

Bonjour de Boston-sur-Marne, France !

[@Filippirgos]

Grüße aus München ! Gestern 5:1, sie waren total machtlos 😃

[@fireburn95rs]

wilkommen

[@himhim3344]

I hope Kherson doesn't turn into Bakhmut 2.0 The total destruction of a city due to stubbornness to retreat is terrible for everyone 😢

[@KilroyishereYT]

There is very little probability that Kherson will be in the sights of the Russians. The probability is that the Russian general staff may decide to advance towards Nicolaev to threaten Odessa in order to have an advantage during future negotiations. Advancing further after Pokrovsk can be very easy but at the same time it can be very difficult to defend given that there are only fields of cereals as far as the eye can see.

[@jonshive5482]

@@KilroyishereYT Yeah but open fields are prime hunting grounds for drones. As Weeb has pointed out before on some fronts Ukrainians are mainly using drones to forestall any Russian initiatives.

[@TheRealRedEyes]

Don't hope then, kherson is apart of russia. and soon or later the oblast will be conquered

[@SuperLuky64]

From my point of view, the Ukrainian military formations listed in the part around Kerson are from many months ago, currently I think they are a third, since all the troops have been diverted to Kharkiv and Sumy. At least this is what Zelensky himself had announced, to make up for a lack of men, caused by the attack on Kursk.

[@seufer12]

On some Telegram channels they say, that they taking soldiers from air defense to the front. If it is true, it is getting worse and worse for Ukraine.

[@Marco_Lam]

From a pure military standpoint, crossing the Dnieper right now doesn't make too much sense, unless they want peace negotiations that include Odessa.

[@Nilshelppi]

Thanks!

[@mohamedconteh9548]

Thanks for the update 🎉🎉🎉

[@Military24h-tv]

I like how concise this channel is. Military summary also looks forward to seeing more videos from you

[@davidkehn6960]

Thanks for the update Weeb!

[@The_Prince_Of_Crows]

That could be what is coming in the new year. They seem to be concentrating more long range artillery and howitzers with longer range than current filed guns too. This allows them to continue to bombard the enemy positions deep into the rear so that they can maintain impetus and not have to move their guns as frequently. I have said since 2022 that they will cross the Dneiper at Zaporozhia. It will turn the whole defense on it's head and allow them to attack them from the flank.

[@cbhlde]

Thanks Weebster! :)

[@mbusonkabinde3330]

Thanks Weeb 🙏. Just so you know, I never miss a single update.

[@AXS512]

It's easy to see what Russia's aims are. Look of the old maps of the Russian speaking regions and you have it. They need to reduce the rump Ukraine to the traditional Ukrainian regions before the Bolsheviks added the Russian areas to it.

[@simonpriest4345]

😂 don’t tell me, Ukr lines are collapsing. In fact they’ve been collapsing pretty much non-stop for a year now with the overall frontline looking very similar.

[@mirtalpur739]

Not similar to me but I get your point.

[@Merluch]

russia has advanced 2800 square kilometers in the avdiivka/vuhledar (now pokrovsk and velyka novosilka) directions

[@Merluch]

thats the size of luxembourg

[@jesan733]

@@Merluch Luxembourg is extremely small.

[@cherrypoptart2001]

Russia needs to take Odessa and make a land corridoor to transnistria .

[@joethekinghawk7514]

I agree

[@KilroyishereYT]

...this is why the Red Army liberated Leningrad first before attacking East Prussia...😂

[@wildsurfer12]

It would appear that is the long term objective of this plan.

[@clivewakley3901]

Kursk is like Cocainsky’s ego - slowly being deflated.

[@elisabettamacghille4623]

Kursk, the Elensky's SNOWboard. 😉

[@lanceshaker5807]

@@clivewakley3901 Cocainsky hahahah 🤣

[@benni-lu1op]

Why are ukrainian troops on russian soil, controlling russian territory?

[@Bigbluecollector316]

this video made Dennys so upset that his stomach started hurting and he had to go to the toilet 😂🤣😂🤣

[@robertfontaine3650]

Denys is pure propaganda. I gave up following him after a few months. You can't get any sense of what is going on from his videos.

[@Orcram]

@@robertfontaine3650 who is Denys?

[@arostwocents]

He uses bots to like his own comments too

[@mickg7299]

@@Orcram Exactly 😂

[@a.t1313]

But not before he soiled his NATO pajamas

[@LucyLucky7580]

So early today Great work as always Weeb 💪

[@Donello]

Early? Weeb used to post his updates in the morning (Central European time). Now it is in the evenings, about 8-12 hours later.

[@WeebUnionWU]

He's likely american from which it is much earlier in the day. I'll be back to my regular schedule tomorrow hopefully...

[@tomislavvaldec1]

​@@WeebUnionWU denys love american market

[@Donello]

@@WeebUnionWU That would be great. I was getting withdrawal symptoms. Thank you for your good work!

[@LeroxYT]

Mechanized infantry would never be in an inactive region for no reason. You dont need mechanized for holding a low combat line. But especially for the russians, theire for river crossings and swift operations, so my guess is that they will try to swiftly break through like at pokrovsk front or kursk counter offensive.

[@торговыйфлот-м1ш]

thanks for the video

[@play_boy7543]

I think it is unlikely that Russians will try to conduct strategic offensive like in early 2022,but you never know,wars are often decided in short period of time after long fight,we don't know real state of ukr forces,if they are weak and overstrached enough it is possible for Russians to try something

[@Lucuskane]

Odessa still an objective of RUAF?

[@deus5185]

once there, ruaf is basically taking odesa since it can be cut out

[@Lucuskane]

@ Makes sense, crossing From Dnipro or Kherson to link with Transnistria would technically encircle Odessa

[@KilroyishereYT]

Noooooo! Don't worry 😂... The Russians don't have the means to conquer without destroying it... and they have no interest in having a destroyed historic city to rebuild. But the Russians will cross the Dnieper to go to Nicolaïev if the new American administration continues its Arab bargaining by offering NATO “peacekeepers” in Ukraine.

[@mejust8392]

The benchmark is, Rusia failed, if it fails to make Ukraine a land-locked country.

[@silveriorebelo2920]

that is not the purpose of Russia - they want to have significant areas with Russian population, so as to make it easy in the future to maintain Ukraine away from the West

[@Sam-fd5yj]

I totally agree with you my guy,

[@hhkk6155]

R-country already won, it's how much they won is being discussed 😅

[@nikolasstyles]

Here we go😀

[@JyBoson]

Thanks Weeb, have a great day too.

[@khairtmz6939]

7:07 If russian batallion's number is 4 digit that means they are mobilized in the fall of 2022, if its 3 or 2 digit then those are on a contract with MoD

[@bernfrank3966]

Thank you 👍🏻

[@zdendaderman5253]

Brilliant analysis 👍

[@joshuakamenski2448]

What about Odessa?

[@karimlerbheley8553]

Bientôt

[@Aaronreacher]

Odessa Is very heavily protected, they haven't bombed the city that much compared to others ever trough they almost have it at artillery range. My guess is that they want it almost intact, for that they forat need to cut the Ukranian supply lines from land and they attempt a ground assault without bombs or missiles and that's gonna be hard because the city is big.

[@paja2788]

What about Kiev...

[@riwo5904]

Jackpot!

[@KilroyishereYT]

@Aaronreacher And not only that! It is impossible to conquer this city without destroying it. Recovering a devastated historic city is not the goal...and then you will have to rebuild this city, have a budget to do it, have teams, serious entrepreneurs, etc. We are not at a time when the Ukrainian army is in shock as was the case in Mariopol. Even with a very weakened Ukrainian army, this will be very devastating for the Russian army.

[@AmericanRebel.Crusader]

This is crazy ;)

[@smalcolmbrown]

Thanks :)

[@mariosmarduch3590]

Host makes good points

[@dirckthedork-knight1201]

Not sure about a river crossing operation to Kherson (city) to be honest the Russians already saw how Ukraine's attempt to a similar operation turned out

[@AgentK-im8ke]

Yeah but Russia amphibious capabilities are much stronger

[@thatonejoey1847]

​@@AgentK-im8ke they still need to minimise casualties so they would first need to make sure not that they had both a massive enough advantage and to make sure reinforcements arrive in time by pinning down as many areas as posible simultaneously

[@CUPAVI1]

I have made a comment about 2 weeks ago, where I said the same thing about Dnipro. If the Russians can get behind Ukie defence line, West of Pokrovsk, they will start moving much faster and will inflict even higher casualties on Ukies. Fighting to free the rest of Donbass makes more sense politically, but going for Dnipro will break the Ukrainian army militarily.

[@joethekinghawk7514]

Good point

[@gabrielb7987]

Ah Krynky here we go again

[@diagonalview2105]

to be honest it seems like a dash towards the powerplant

[@permaculturaextremadura]

Tak for opdatering

[@edvard8850]

It’s obvious Ukraine will lose Kursk

[@aneurindavies5943]

Ukraine only had a foothold in the Kursk Region and is currently slipping back, but with heavy losses.

[@MarketwizardPF]

Strongly believe that Russia is not re-taking Kursk on purpose for now. It's the ideal area for Russia to decimate them, couldn't be any closer to their supplies and artillery and besides Ukraine is pooring in their elite troops. It's another PR move that turned out to be very costly.

[@agzamakhunov4906]

Tatarstan was attacked with drones. Where were the drones launched from? Kazan is far from the front lines.

[@KilroyishereYT]

Even I asked myself the question... and I answered my question... Even with very careful help from the CIA/MI6 teams, they have the route plans to prevent this unmanned ULM from escaping detection. It is impossible to fly 1300-1500 km within the federation. In my opinion this drone has not flown more than 100 km.

[@young749Au]

GOOD OBSERVATION WEEB: "It is likely that the Russians will be stepping up offensive operations already now and all the way until this war ends and you will see an intensification and escalation of the conflict this period of time"

[@wildsurfer12]

Wouldn’t the Russians want to get to Odessa and Transnistria if they cross the Dniper River?

[@NeoCynic1]

It's BOMBARDED

[@FabiusPolis]

9:43 No, thats the wrong approach of the calculation. The question is how much they need to reduce the UAF further per day until the defense of the frontlines become unsustainable. The focus on the maps let us forget about the major element in this war, the troops.

[@mikelthemafia]

6:12 in other words: deserteurs, deserteurs and even more deserteurs

[@Boza5070]

if Russins dint get Odessa that war is fail for them

[@fatechance4013]

Odessa is never their objectives from the beginning.

[@VikOlliver]

Presumably this means Russia needs a lot more Russian soldiers, or a lot less Ukrainian ones?

[@valQC]

Please stop talking about Trump inauguration, nothing will happend ; One mafia will be replace with same mafia, different team.

[@jaredjosephsongheng372]

Idk about that......

[@xconnorgrillox]

General offensive next year

[@sergiotorres1069]

Damn so no Christmas c-fire 😢

[@daveconrad6562]

Not this year buddy, ukraine is on the naughty list

[@jaredjosephsongheng372]

​@@daveconrad6562 Why is Ukraine on the naughty list? What did Ukraine do to deserve this, it's all Nato's fault, why should the Ukrainians take the blame for it.

[@daveconrad6562]

@jaredjosephsongheng372 same as is'rel, they failed to stop the corruptors in charge

[@alanklm]

Do you think that there is any way for Russians to get Kherson and Zaporizhia cities militarily?

[@Trebelsi]

Yes. They are going around and pincering weak spots, creating cauldrons which creates new fronts the ukr have to stabilize, then the Russians rinse and repeat, bypassing the most fortifications possible

[@alanklm]

@@Trebelsi you are talking about this like something we've already seen. But we haven't. Bakhmut was the largest city and it was much smaller, and took 9 months to take.

[@MarketwizardPF]

Yes, there will be a point of no return and we seem to approach that point quicker every day. The only thing that can save Ukraine would be either quick negotiations or boots on the ground from the West. They won't be able to hold back the Russians at one point, simply due to lack of soldiers, loss of moral and shortage on ammunition. Anyhow, seems the Ukrainians prefer to lose it all.

[@Mark-i9k5i]

Maybe, design diversion

[@babybalint1164]

J’espère que la Russie va attendre les objectifs,vive la Russie ❤❤❤❤

[@beardeddpsycho]

A kherson offensive!!! hmm maybe that's why they have been training so many drone operators In this front. They know ukraine loves PR victories and ukraine will send thousands of troops to that front to defeat the Russians, this is when the Russians will turn this into a bakhmut still meat grinder but with drones. Just a thought. What do you guys think

[@whatisourchildrenlearning]

I don't think Russia are going to take Kherson. It's too difficult to defend once captured. I think this is a diversion tactic to retake Kursk.

[@danilo8325]

Bro for 1h got over 10k views, u in serious business 😂

[@smaragd_]

Why not surround Kiev with extra front and demand from Ukraine whatever they want?

[@Trebelsi]

No need, they have all the momentum. It's not worth the careless risk to their soldiers.

[@Barmalay-hc1rt]

I don't think you understand. This is not a war over territory, it was never declared as a war over territory. The main goal is to eliminate the threat from the proxy state bordering Russia under the control of NATO, this proxy state has put hostility to Russia and open neo-Nazism at the head of its ideology. Everyone talks about peace talks, but everyone sees it differently. Ukraine needs a freeze on the front line to prepare for the next war in a few years (on the record, no one is interested in Ukraine's opinion at all). It's not clear why Russia would agree to such an option. Russia will stop the war only with a complete change of leadership in Ukraine, with a complete change of ideological course and with a refusal to heroise the collaborators of fascism and Nazism. Let's be honest, the Ukrainian government will never do this voluntarily, and not even the United States can force it to do so. Europe is increasingly divided between those who want peace and those who are not allowed by the United States to want peace. The United States itself is very happy about everything: Russia has big problems, the European Union has big problems, the United States has new military contracts, new manufacturing that has fled Europe, everything is just great. This is the third such operation in the last 100+ years with a major war in Europe. What Trump, Putin or Zelensky say has very little relevance in this context as it seems to me, it's just very fashionable now to talk about peace agreements. Everyone wants to look like peacemakers because ordinary people all over the world don't want this war at all and politicians are playing their roles for the electorate. To my mind, there is no objective evidence that such agreements will be made in the near future, I think that the war will last until the complete collapse of Ukraine.

[@jesan733]

*"The main goal is to eliminate the threat from the proxy state bordering Russia under the control of NATO"* This was never a threat. *"open neo-Nazism at the head of its ideology."* I don't think even the poor victims of Russian propaganda here believe that nonsense any more. *"Ukraine needs a freeze on the front line to prepare for the next war in a few years"* Nice reality inversion. *"Europe is increasingly divided between those who want peace and those who are not allowed by the United States to want peace."* All of the world's leaders wants peace, except Putin and a few of his friends. *"What Trump, Putin or Zelensky say has very little relevance in this context as it seems to me, it's just very fashionable now to talk about peace agreements."* We can agree peace agreements aren't realistic at this time. *"I think that the war will last until the complete collapse of Ukraine."* Or of the Kremlin.

[@johnsplace7779]

Wasted time having to search here and there inside the long recording for the "Kherson offensive". Why not start with the main item?????

[@gabrielgonzalezrio]

Have you noticed that the regions that have been claimed by Rus form the shape of a seahorse?? Coincidence? I don't think so

[@vaska1999]

😅

[@Trebelsi]

The Russian black seahorse formation

[@didiermangeot7807]

- bonjour - c'est toute l'ukraine qui revient à la russie ! puis la suite...

[@ndrklerz2178]

Clickbait, report has nothing in it.

[@JacquesBiantouari-tv5cx]

❤❤❤❤❤😂🎉🎉🎉

[@elisabettamacghille4623]

What I find interesting from a military perspective is that we are never able to foresee, or even just guess, which are the real objectives of the Special Military Operation, so we can't fully understand the real meaning of what Russians are about to do on the field at tactical level, this ability to hide, conceal, camouflage the general strategic objectives of the war and thus make the consequent tactical objectives obscure and elusive, is IMO one of the the keys of the success of the Russian side in this war.

[@Jeffrey-b8d]

Ukraine is forked!

[@petermeter9890]

UA is still too strong to acjieve these goals soon. Maybe another year which could be still in 2025 so let's see

[@LjubomirZuna]

I like your reports but yor predictions are senseless,coz only General Staff know the future moves

[@Z_Pavel]

BS, remember the reason why we leaved Kherson - because Antonov bridge was destroyed and Kahovka dam was in danger (and it was later proved to be right decision after it was blown by ukrainians).

[@freedonbass266]

dear video maker! You see if you do not show videos of actual fights, you have 2200 likes while military summary has 10000!!

[@tomaszpaklepa5864]

The Military Land map does not present the current situation on the front line and certainly does not present the current location of units on the front - which the author should know (just look at the map and compare it with the SURIYAK map, which the author mainly uses here) so this "analysis" is a bit bizarre... Anyway, it would be strange if a publicly available map presented such a current location of units - because then what would the intelligence services of both sides have to do🙂?

[@Jon-j7m]

Putler go home!

[@knanliyev6025]

Brigades in Kherson are not 100% some of them are in north Kursk and Kharkov :v

[@powerstroke6.7]

Russia is not a third world country like Afghanistan…. Be careful poking the bear.

[@TwWolf-fm9dj]

Z🇷🇺☝️😏..ukronaze kaput😏

[@bluestar2253]

STOP WARMONGERING!!!

[@Riconald]

Ukraine is doomed…

[@_A.d.G_]

Just let the Russians secure enough river crossings and watch the real SMO begin.

[@swhip897]

Im an amateur but it appears Ukraine is on trouble

[@categories5066]

Russia is not going to do any large scale offensives. And if they do, they will gain maybe like 10 fields and 3 blocks, and then grind to a halt. And there is jo way theyll try crossing over to Kherson. Imagine trying to cross the Dniper river while getting fired at, and trying to supply it at the same time when the Ukrainians have Himars and Atacms. Its simply a fantasy. If Russia actually wants to take huge swaths of land then theyll need 3x Ukraines troops, which would be around 2,100,000. But that will never happen. Russias only way to win the war is to hope Trump cuts all aid to Ukraine and they run out of ammo. As long as theyre being armed by NATO this war isnt going to end any time soon.

[@Алексей545-т6б]

Emm...You did not take in consideration big factors such are: . 1)General degradation of UAF (with each passing month situation get only worse - those who were KIA in battle are replaced with poorly trained, low motivation and bad health soldiers with lack of skills). Basicly they become german army from 1944 . 2)Big russian advantage in firepower. Russians can allow to themself level to the ground entire defensive positions without need to go into actual combat . 3)European (and US) stocks are not infinite. More than that - many types of weapon systems they have very limited production or cancel production 15+ years ago. This war consume a lot of stuff, but while russians have enough capabilities to replace epair...EU and US just drain their stock pile . Why for God sake Russia would cross the river while they could enter threw Belorussia border without any issue

[@joethekinghawk7514]

Russia has the manpower and weaponry to go any where in Ukraine as they do choose , instead, attrition will do for now.

[@joethekinghawk7514]

@@Алексей545-т6бexcellent point 🏆🏆🏆

[@Crimsenreign13]

Get a load of this guy

[@ayax2134]

they shouldnt atack jerson

[@jonshive5482]

It would seem that any Rus offensive across the Dnieper into Kherson would be a lot like Ukraine going into Kursk. Come to think of it, both sides are Slavs with similar predilections so maybe they'd really do it.

[@CHRIS-fs4qy]

Z

[@wespeakforthetrees]

I haven't watched you for about a year. I'm just sick to death of your pro russian bias. But I miss the sound pf your voice, and your pronunciations. So keep up the great work. I'll drop in now and then to see if you have regained your sanity and started to support Ukraine. But that is not likely. I think you actually believe the Russian propaganda. Tragic. You have so much intelligence. I wish you would use it to remove the blinders from your eyes.

[@MarketwizardPF]

Pro Russian? He's completely neutral, but seems hard to digest the truth for the Ukrainians. And talking about intelligence, if you would read a bit more books, travel the world, talk to different people in different cultures, you would perhaps one day realize what is actually going on in Ukraine and that it has absolutely nothing to do with the Ukrainians themselves.

[@peteedgley1332]

Ukraine's biggest problem is troops, low recruitment could cause massive collapse.

[@kerder8660]

commented predictions at beginning of this year on kherson front 24/25 winter offensive ..hehehe just saying .. 2 to 1 with crossing that river it's going to be disastrous .. ruskies need around 4 to 1..in menpower advantage .. but anyhow it's going to be ..

[@KilroyishereYT]

I wonder, could Russia decide to use “an H” in the middle of the Kursk salient, as a military escalation? Civilians are evacuated, the new high-yield bombs don't leave much residue, the region is theirs to say that it's a relatively modest nuclear escalation...etc. Please leave a response of some kind, indicating your region or country, so that I can measure the level of my shadow-b... please.

[@jaredjosephsongheng372]

IDK ABOUT THAT ONE 😅 That sounds a little too dangerous

[@0ld.Richard]

In the south, Russia must focus on defending Energodar. They cannot allow a surprise capture of ZNPP.

[@Typical187-]

Captured by who ? ALIENS 😂

[@TheTacticalDood]

This has to be the most boring war of the 21st century. OMG!

[@jaredjosephsongheng372]

Yeah tbh

[@Crimsenreign13]

You're what's wrong with society

[@TheTacticalDood]

@@Crimsenreign13 Why so? It is not me who is prolonging the war. It could have ended years ago if Zelenksy was a little bit more reasonable.

[@mistressofeconomicinvincib7017]

Why is it taking rus 4+ months to win against photographers in Kursk? 😂😂😂😂

[@Trebelsi]

They don't want to stop the party early

[@bjorn1583]

anything to keep your copium going 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@mistressofeconomicinvincib7017]

@@Trebelsi why does rus need n Koreans for photographers? lol.

[@donalddalley7274]

How many Russian casualties per sq km now 50ish? Totally unsustainable.

[@WeebUnionWU]

Last December Russia had 600k soldiers, now they have 800k I don't know what their casualties are but its certainly sustainable.

[@vergilroth]

More interesting question is how many Ukr casualties to defend? What they're doing is not sustainable.

[@poyaispanic5269]

Welcome to the real news about the war, you will soon realize you are being lied to by the corporate news, about “unsustainable losses”, “human wave attacks”, and so on

[@mrkukovecz]

Check out Binkov's recent video on the casualties. In short, neither side will run out of soldiers in the near future, however, the situation is looking better for the Russians despite their higher loss rate.

[@fatechance4013]

​@@mrkukoveczRussia have much less numbers of casualties than Ukraine. For 1 Russian soldier 5~7 Ukraine

[@juliocastillo8472]

dawg a water crossing again ? would be insane