Rules for using AI in Research: Watch before you submit your paper!

[@Lucas_Kup]

Very interesting, thanks for sharing it! Just to double check then, writing a paragraph or a section, for example, and asking the chatgpt to rewrite it on more academic standards will not cause any issues as far as I mention that we used chatgpt for this at the end right? I am pretty sure this is fine since it is only improving language instead of writing any "new" actual information.

[@csmentorsilvestri]

Luca, thank you for your question. For the current rules, you should declare that you have used ChatGPT for editing purposes only. I do not think this would cause issues in the review process. However, I warn you to double check the text produced, as some of the meaning may be lost/altered.

[@bionh]

IMHO best usage for cases like this, is to ask for suggestions / criticisms / proofreading, then filter it through your own brain. The thing isn’t reliable enough to replace your brain. The text is absolutely distinguishable, because it’s riddled with errors and filler words and clichés

[@csmentorsilvestri]

I agree, however not everyone will be using it ethically. We need rules to define the boundaries of what can and cannot be done, and guide editors, reviewers, and TPC chairs.

[@yinghangma2309]

Hi CsMentor, your caption might be wrong. It should be 'ChatGPT' or 'GPT4' instead of 'ChatGPD'.

[@csmentorsilvestri]

Thank you very much, I corrected the typo!