Which Running Gadgets ACTUALLY Make You Faster?

[@runningchannel]

↓↓ Which of these gadgets is your favourite? Do you think that running dynamics technology is the future? Which running metrics do you look at when you’re running? Let us know! ↓↓

[@Anihalas]

I love my stryd. It's so much easier to train in power zones. I can push myself harder too! The accurate speed and distance in a dense forest or city compared to gps is great! I love how you build up running stress and then recover before a race for peak performance. It's so motivating!

[@jone6638]

The Garmin Pod seems just what I need (injured my right foot and ankle a while back in karate - so I need to be aware of my form), so just ordered one! Many thanks for the video!!

[@MzuMzu-nx1em]

I have post some workout videos with easy simple ways to improve 💪 running, flexibility, stamina, coordination and power. Don't mind the stomach, I am 45

[@tinalouise_runcoach]

Used the garmin pod AND the HR Pro... love them both for the data, but am allergic to the band on the HR pro (am also allergic to garmin silicon watch bands and have to change them) so the pod wins hands down for me.

[@funkyfinnegan]

Stryd for sure!

[@leslie7922]

Stryd saved me in a marathon, I used power to gauge my effort into a very tough headwind. Other people blew up 8km of headwind later but I was sticking to power and had no worries.

[@drmatt1984]

I love my Stryd! It's personalised power-based training plans got me round my first marathon in 3:21, pretty much exactly what it predicted!

[@lomike91]

We now know which data these gadget will collect, what about a video on how to use this data to improve? Always interesting videos here 👍

[@tinman221]

Initially I got the Garmin footpod and it has helped me sort out the imbalance between feet. Then I got a Stryd and that has been a game changer. I used to go too hard Which led to me being very slow towards the end but running to constant power has got my parkrun down from 32 minutes plus to 29:26. And my 10/12km runs not do not totally exhaust me.

[@tjubix1525]

How do you know what power you can run at?

[@tinman221]

@@tjubix1525 you need to build up a graph over a couple of weeks then the Stryd app creates the graph which lets you know how to sustain rings

[@tjubix1525]

@@tinman221 ok... How to sustain "rings"?

[@momagic8912]

POWER!! More POWER! For me a Styrd was a game changer.

[@incusperformance7955]

Thanks for featuring INCUS :) We actually have a new running t-strap now to replace the vest (for a more comfortable fit).

[@ludovicjost4911]

My two favorites are Stryd and HRM Pro, for inside/outside (including Zwift) workout precision. HRM Pro for same reasons ou exposed but also because that's the only Garmin HRM with all these metrics with double connection either Ant+ or bluetooth! Quite useful to have both instead of only ant+ in the HRM Run (the red one). I changed the battery and didn't get any issues. It goes to swimming pools and open water. That's the one to buy that can do everything for any sports. Stryd ist of course good because of power, but not only. It gives you an absolute proper distance covered metric which is definitely a must have if you run in big cities or forests, where the GPS from the watch is not giving a correct pace. The Stryd is always perfect. Of course you need to connect it properly, and add on garmin the data field to get the metrics included in your fit file (ie the activity details) but it's not that complicated and for those getting to the point of buying a Stryd it's something "known" to do. Another massive advantage of the stryd is the connection to Zwift! Everybody knows treadmills shows a fantasy speed which is not your outside running speed. So using s Stryd will ensure you run inside and outside at the same speed/pace! And in Zwift you have then a correct measure of the speed exactly like outside (you will be "slower" than people actually using the speed of the belt but at least no difference between inside/outside running for you personally). And Stryd connects both ant+ and bluetooth, so another big advantage here :) And about the video, it was really nice to learn about other tools I didn't know about so quite informative :)

[@runningchannel]

Great to hear that you found the video useful Ludovic.

[@chriscotton4207]

With stryde how accurate does it seem for short distance and speed? I have a Garmin pod I'm looking to replace. I have an hrm but not with running dynamics.

[@alfromtx245]

Stryd is awesome! There's plenty of data to nerd out over, if that's what you're into. But I use it more for dialing in my training intensity and for racing. Take a typical long run for example. I'll set my watch screen to show distance and lap average power. I hardly even look at my watch until the end of mile 2, but just try to settle into an easy effort. Then, wherever my lap average power is at that point (a warmed-up easy effort), I'll just maintain the same intensity for the rest of the run. That way, regardless of the terrain or wind, the intensity is just right (easy). Stryd was a lifesaver on my last marathon. It was a course with a lot of hills and a very windy day. This could have been a disaster. But by holding my power target, I was able to run the entire race without ever having to slow down. I finished strong, feeling like the tank was pretty much empty. So yes, Stryd definitely gets my vote!

[@migueschindler]

The HRM Run and Tri also have the running metrics just as the Pro! I went for the Run as I don't swim much and I always use my watch while running, so no need for storage in the chest strap.

[@nik9401]

Very good video! Would love an extended one, about all the metrics. I own a Garmin Forerunner 945 and there are loads of datafields i‘m not sure how to use. Cheers

[@phil984]

*Big thanks to the Running Channel*! yesterday i ran my first event ever and you guys helped me to this achieve this goal. Goal was 10k in 69:59 and i made it 2 min faster💪🏻

[@runningchannel]

Well done Phil, what is the next target?

[@phil984]

@@runningchannel kzbin.info/www/bejne/goi2coOPosp6o7c

[@areuneker]

Thanks for the video. I agree that Garmin's HRM straps work very well, but only until you have to change batteries. Even when replacing the little rubber rings and doing everything by the book, trying different battery brands et cetera, three (!) Garming HRM straps have died on me (one regular HRM, two HRM Run straps), so I switched to a Polar H10. I've heard similar stories from other runners, so it might be something to factor in if you're deciding on a heart-rate strap.

That’s a bummer. Perhaps Garmin should consider upgrading it to allow charging it wirelessly with an inductive charging station.

[@benr9343]

Same.

[@paulinegoddard5361]

Hi Anna and all on the running channel I did it ran my first marathon at Brighton woohoo thanks for your inspiring channel helped me so much during training. I booked my second marathon April 2022. Your channel is the best thank you. Had an amazing time on Sunday legs tender but resting recovering to build stronger running for April. X

[@iggalan]

I don’t recommend the Garmin HRM Pro because the module and strap are a single piece. Once the electrodes from the strap deteriorate from sweat and swimming in open waters (I have the HRM Tri) you have to replace it all instead of buying a new strap like on the Polar H10. I really like the Garmin Running Pod though, it’s really small and gives the same metrics than the HRM Pro (minus heart rate). For me the perfect combination is the Polar H10 strap, in which you can replace the strap and keep the module, plus Garmin Running Pod.

[@mjuk1984]

I use the Garmin HRM-Pro. It's very helpful for my heart rate training as it is more accurate. The metrics it provides are great. Vertical oscillation and ratio, and GCT ratio have helped improve my running. If you just want metrics though then get the Pod. If you want an HRM too, then invest in the Pro rather than Pod and HRM (unless you specialise in swimming). Enjoyed hearing about all these other gadgets!!!

[@sandwich0990]

So I take it if you have the HRM pro, the pod would pretty much be useless as it gives more or less the same data?

[@g4rymw110]

I have the Garmin Run Pod , so much data , doesn’t make me any quicker though 😀, battery lasts for ages , when you finish your activity it prompts you via an alert on your Garmin watch to remove it from your shorts or tights, its so tiny you forget it’s there and once mine went in the wash on a full cycle by accident as I forgot to remove it and it still works fine. 5/5 for me

[@rubenwijnen3738]

I use Runscribe Sensors sometimes. They have the possibilty to run with two (on the laces) or three (one on the pelvis) for added data. They also have a pro course to learn how to interpret the data and use it

[@tnan123]

I really want to give these a try but also am not sure how to actually constructively use the data it might give which has made me hesitant to actually put money on it. Good overview of the many different gadgets!

[@astroglow]

ive bought the garmin pod to go with my forerunner 245 and really find it easy to use i forget its there, and enjoy reviewing my stats after

[@CSWells-uq4jx]

I just wanna point out with that one gadget, that running barefoot, basically guarantees that you’re not going to heel strike. So, it’s not a good indicator of how you actually run with shoes on. Nobody heel strikes when they run barefoot because it hurts instantly.

[@stefanjohansson3670]

The Garmin pod is great. I've been using it a lot. You don't feel it. When you ended your run, your watch will remind you to take it off. Mine have been cleaned in the washing machine 2-3 times. It starts up by you shaking it. I can recommend it too.

[@runningchannel]

Thanks for sharing!

[@adamsheridan8512]

I have one but never know what actually to do with the data

And how does it shut down?

[@stefanjohansson3670]

@ , just stop your activity and put it away. It shut off automatically.

[@regstoy]

Have been using Garmin's original 1st generation HRM Run for years, the sensor module itself is still working great, but I've changed the actual strap 3 times. The problem with HR monitors is the strap itself is the weak link and I think Garmin are being a bit naughty in not allowing you to keep the module while changing the strap. In saying that the only information I personally find useful is obviously HR, I'm currently running to HR rather than pace, cadence as I notice it drop off as I get tired (but my watch does it too) and L/R balance as I use it as an indicator of a possible injury coming if I favour one side over the other. The one thing ye didn't mention was power, the HRM run after downloading an app to you watch (why do we need to do this Garmin) will give you a power reading and I find that interesting. So for me Anna's choice, the Pod, is the best value for money and will be included in a future letter to Santa after my HR finally gives up the ghost.

[@tjubix1525]

How do you measure the power? What app do you need to install? Do you need a Stryd?

[@regstoy]

@@tjubix1525 there is native power on some of the newer watches, in saying that, I used the Garmin power app from the connect IQ store for my older 645, you need the newer HRM run straps, the dual strap doesn't do record these metrics. I use the power readings mainly for faster interval runs, other than that, it's more curiosity after a run, that I look at them.

[@capeflatterytrail]

Did you consider any tech from Polar or Wahoo? I believe both have comparable HRM straps. It might have been a good comparison.

[@gyozakeynsianism]

True, but this video appears to have been sponsored by Garmin.

[@capeflatterytrail]

@@gyozakeynsianism Yes, I suspected that as they often tout Garmin gear. It kind of makes you lose trust in their opinions, though, when they say they are unbiased and not paid for their recommendations.

[@kwc7391]

I am new to running this year (ok, jogging 4.5mph) at 71 years old. Avid Cyclist for over 35 years. Looking forward in doing this........ LET'S DO THIS !!!

[@AdvancedLiving]

Running / No Limit Hold’em Poker / Pizza Dough - what do these three have in common? Easy to learn, lifetime to master.

[@gyozakeynsianism]

Gadgets up your sleeve can help with poker too.

[@rabihyounes747]

Does the Garmin HRM dual heart monitor also work away from your phone and can connect to Garmin Connect (forerunner 55 watch) ?

[@bencze465]

The topics you're touching are interesting but I consistently find the approach a bit superficial. Just mentioning the most obvious here, I find Stryd to be severely undervalued and you didn't talk about its main points. Like reviewing a car's interior features but skip looking at its engine and transmission. Stryd has 2 main things (as far as I discovered in 4 years): 1. Power - essentially if you do any uneven terrain like trail, you can't pace by, well, pace, but you will need something else to make your intensity consistent that is responsive. That is pretty much power, HR is slow for that, not ideal especially if your terrain is not about big mountains but more undulated (that the word?). 2. Distance measurement. May not be 100% accurate but it's probably better than GPS and more importantly it's super consistent (as long as you're running - I found it less good walking steep sections). I basically used Stryd to do repeated 200m, or 400m efforts when I was doing reps for marathon training. If you know how GPS works you know instant pace is completely useless. But with Stryd in a couple of seconds of pace change you will see a pretty accurate pace so if you're training according to pace (I was using a Jack Daniel training plan so I had established paces to run my different trainings) you just need it. Of course if you do your reps on a track you don't, and that is always the best - track and a stopwatch - but for a lot of us that don't have a track nearby an accurate pace measurement is pretty much critical if you are aiming for a specific race time (e.g. if you're aiming for a 3:30 marathon you better know approximately in advance what half, 10k, 5k, or intervals you're supposed to be able to run). So consistent power and distance measurement are 2 super important aspects of Stryd, the rest are just nice additions (it measures / estimates a lot of the same data the Garmin straps do like the Run or Tri (or the new Pro which is almost exactly like the tri just new colour and more expensive.. sure it has BLT but if you use this you surely have a Garmin watch and use ANT+ anyway).

[@xelionizer]

Thanks a bunch for giving us your insights on the different devices! I personally use a Garmin watch paired with HRM-Run and the Stryd pod, which I've been very happy with, especially the Stryd pod (No, I'm not payed to say good things about their product)! One aspect I would have loved to see you guys include and give a score is the customer support for the devices. Some manufacturers have NO interaction with their users, and others reply very willingly and are interested in their users feedback;) Cheers!

[@runningchannel]

That's a really good suggestion, we'll have a look at how we might be able to do this. Thanks!

[@giovanbattistafichera8439]

I'm currently considering getting a Stryd but will that thingy stay attached and functional if I do trail running/stream crossing sections?

[@gyozakeynsianism]

This was a nice introduction to some nice-looking products. Thank you. I took a look at Nurvv but that's just too expensive and too involved. I knew about the Garmin running pod and the HRM Pro. I think I'll eventually end up with the HRM Pro as I already use a chest strap HRM and I don't want to have to put on yet another thing before going out for a run. Also, I have to wait as my current Garmin device does not do all those running dynamics things.

[@jbosseur]

Very nice, the garmin HRM pro and foot pod don´t work with all garmin watches though!

[@michaelgoode9555]

I found myself drowning in information last year and it began to affect my running in a negative way. I run for enjoyment and to help with fitness but I have no ambition to break records or win events. Note, I said events and not races. I don't race. I use a Garmin running chest strap (red) because I have found that using wrist-based hr was too erratic. There is lots of other data on the watch and the strap but I use the watch to record my distance and route and the chest strap to enable me to keep a more reliable check on hr. I do a low hr session weekly. I also have an alarm to help me stay below tempo rate on all of my other runs except for when I do intervals. Information anxiety is a real issue for some people but I appreciate that others simply cannot get enough.

[@runningchannel]

Thank you for sharing Michael. We hope videos like this help to keep information accessible and not too overwhelming. Happy running!

The Garmin HRM pro has been my default chest strap for years. I think it hits the right balance between ease of use, usefulness and price.

[@flodolo]

One thing that is not mentioned about Stryd is that's a killer footpod to track distance and instant speed, especially on short intervals, and it can be calibrated on your running. Also, battery lasts way longer than I expected (I charge it maybe twice a month). No more activities with completely made up data because GPS got lost. I'd buy it again if it were to break down, although I have to admit it's a bit overkill for the level of runner I am.

[@paulwray7937]

I think Stryd is completely understated here. It’s an incredible piece of tech, granted running with power requires a different mindset. Once onboard it’s indispensable.

[@sandwich0990]

Is is worth having a heart rate monitor on the chest PLuS the garmin pod in the back of the shorts? They seem to be giving similar data, is the pod really that usefull if you have the HRM pro?

[@anirudhaathani2914]

Hi Andy and Anna, this is a great video! You've covered so many high-tech running gadgets along with your short reviews. No doubt it would be interesting to know data such as ground contact tiny, left right balance, etc. I'm just wondering what I can do with this information, I mean how is it actionable? Thankful if you could throw some light on this!

[@runningchannel]

Hi Anirudha, in most cases these data points represent some marginal gains, however when you take them all together, improvements to your overall performance can be acheived. Every metric recorded has a value and can help with your run.

[@ludovicjost4911]

As an example vertical oscillation would show you if you move up and down too much, meaning you form whole running is not optimal. I'm no pro, but makes sense when you see that, that you should then be more aware while you run of controlling your body movements and try to correct this up and down move to improve your form, especially if you have no one to look at how you run and tell you it's not ideal😊

[@anirudhaathani2914]

Thank you guys. I've ordered the Coros POD, mainly because I saw it works with a smartphone without the watch, and I don't intend to change my running watch at the moment!

[@sn2tn]

Is Running POD still useful incase you own HRM Pro? Does it provide any further metric?

[@Caustictherapy]

Im new to running (well coming back to it after covid and i wast that good back then but) is the Garmin pod something you would recommend for a new runner ? I got the Forerunner 245 for christmas so i know its compatable just not sure if im tryimg to get into texh thats beyond my skill level yet

[@julietaandr]

I would pick the Garmin that Anna picked. I just loved it, I think I'm going to buy one!! Thank you for the review, it was very helpful!

[@runningchannel]

Good choice. Thanks for watching!

[@runnymanrunning]

The Machina really isn't a great shoe; it's heavy, firm, and soaks up sweat and moisture like a sponge. For HOVR you can get the same tech in the Infinite and Velociti but with a much better running experience and for less money. I really enjoyed the Velociti 2 that I've run the outsole completely down on, but try as I might (and I've REALLY tried), I can't find anything positive to say about the Machina at all.

[@garyobrien502]

Looking forward to the Garmin integration with Incus. Ran with it today and in just a half hour run I could see areas for improvement. I'm just finicky about running with a phone. It is unfairly good for swimming too, metrics a coach cannot see

[@kevinodonovan1593]

With a name 'footpod' that's not where you'd think it goes! Lol. Have been tempted by Stryd a few times, but giving control to a device of fast I should run, I dunno... Found the chest strap I had before I got wrist based heart rate watches chafed a bit in longer runs, tended to move out of place too, maybe newer straps are better. The Garmin footpod looks reasonably priced and all, doesn't seem like it would fall off or anything? Doesn't chafe hopefully? Strava seems a way to escape a particular eco system, might it be an option to cross to others while keeping your current stuff too?

[@namits3775]

I dont think kenyan runners use any "gadgets", just hard work. Just run to feel, regularly and thats all you need.

[@ludovicjost4911]

Kenyan runners if you mean the pros indeed they definitely don't use that themselves even though you can see many checking their watch for pace and time... For non pros having lot less time to train is still a good value added, because could help you improve faster in the very short amount of time between normal every day job and real life things. Just looking at better precision with a Stryd giving you the correct pace where the GPS loses signal, can be already a good thing to have an idea of how you run... 😊

[@markfinlay422]

These are great for improving if you're a decent runner. If you plod along like me at 1:30 for a HM what would be the point?

[@61js]

If you're a decent runner to begin with surely the percentage gains are going to be less than if you are a "plodder" ie you have bigger scope to improve. That's unless you're happy with what you're doing and then all the gadgets become a bit meaningless.

@@61js, if you’re a decent runner you don’t need any of these gadgets to improve your running technique and fitness.

[@glennnicholls8510]

I would love to be able to plod out a 1:30 half marathon, so I am nowhere near a decent runner. I have found the HRM stops me trying to go too hard. I do a lot of races that take 3-4 hours and found the HRM helps with my pacing a lot.

[@peosforos13]

Can I calculate running power with Garmin Pod and my Forerunner 745?

[@avinashbhogun]

I use the old version HRM-strap from Garmin. When its time I will upgrade to the HRM-Pro. I have been using a HRM since 2019 and now I know what some of the data is, thanks! :)

[@OssamaLamlum]

Thanks for introducing these lovely gadgets, I would have liked to see more details on the metrics themselves, perhaps more visual representations.

[@runningchannel]

Thanks Ossama, we'll try and bring more visuals into our next review.

[@tobyhartley2829]

Wow memory lane for me...! How do these compare to the Nike+ pod insert to your shoe that was around 15 years ago?

[@JackD87]

Omg I forgot I had one of those. “Totally useless” was what sprung to mind when I read that 😂😂😂

[@arne.munther]

So does the Garmin Dynaic Pod do something that the Garmin HRM-Pro doesn't ?

[@MrRampro]

Sooo glad your reviews can’t be purchased !!

[@kathydriscoll8189]

What is the best kind of foot stike when running?

[@chriscotton4207]

The one that gives you the least amount of contact time

[@peterbrown6453]

I have a Garmin HRM but it gives me contact dermatitis 😫 so I had to stop wearing it. I am cautious of wearing anything like that around my chest nowadays.

[@chrisellison8074]

Did you get a rash all the way around or just at the clip site? I ask b/c I get a pretty good rub rash at the clip site on longer runs (>10miles for me). I've had success using body glide at the clip site. If the rash is all the way across the rubber sensor part, then I'm not sure anything will help. You could try some conducting gel as a type of barrier, but if you have an allergy to one of the components of the rubber, that may not help.

[@peterbrown6453]

@@chrisellison8074 all across where the sensors are. The strap around the back didn’t cause problems I don’t think. Doctor told me to stop using it so I did, the rash disappeared.

[@adam85296]

Thanks guys - can you estimate how much more accurate the garmin HRM is than a Garmin Fenix 6 watch??

[@ludovicjost4911]

I own a 6x pro and doesn't matter which watch model, the HRM will always be 10 times more accurate. Wrist based is not as efficient as chest based, and can't record variability as quickly as the chest strap.

[@ABucc]

Just to add, if you're going to use the Nurrv gadget, make sure it's with the lightest running shoes you have. Any added weight is never good.

[@chriscotton4207]

Skip a water before the run. All even

[@dawnwoodward2228]

Thanks for explaining cadence 💕

[@malcoop8160]

That's disappointing you can't buy Garmin foot pods in Australia

[@benr9343]

Yes you can. I have one.

[@nelson.m_16]

how can i fix when I supinate to much?

[@ferryvantichelen6521]

No realtime lactic acid sensors available yet?

[@almckinnon1753]

I’ve not had much luck with these gadgets. Had the Garmin POD and it came off during a XC run. Did the same with the STRYD it came off during a run, the clasp to hold it isn’t strong enough, maybe good for road only but XC you’ll lose it every time. Both give you great data and a lot of it, you can get overwhelmed if you’re not savvy enough to only use what you want it for or if you’re lucky enough to understand it all.

[@aakashrathi01]

Thanks dude

[@pauls.2679]

love your channel

[@runningchannel]

Thanks Paul! Glad you like it!

[@debanjande]

Problem with Garmin Run Dynamics is you need to be part of Garmin ecosystem for running. I had a Garmin Instinct Solar and unfortunately it doesn't connect with it. Nor it connected to any smartphone app as well. So it was a big thumb down from me... :-(

[@runningchannel]

That's a fair observation.

[@b9904]

Sports watch plus chest heart rate plus ID and med info = bang for the buck.

[@000retaliate]

I would like to see @TheRunningChannel do a review on the TrainAsOne app!

[@runningchannel]

We'll add it to our list, thank you.

[@adityasharma4452]

Noise colorfit pro2

[@Adamveighey]

Nice!

[@dyvel]

No gadgets _actually_ make you faster. However, depending on what you're motivated by, some stuff can help you do that extra training session, or replace some wisdom required to get more effective workouts and rest. It's the training that makes the difference. If gadgets could make you faster experience would mean nothing. Perhaps some of them can help you reach your potential faster.

[@augustusgreen7881]

Hello

[@runningchannel]

Hello Augustus!

[@jimashmore5216]

This is an example of trying to substitute tech for actually working the fundamentals. It is like buying $60 running shorts, but skipping a long run three times a month. For a vast majority of runners, me included, we don’t need either $60 running shorts or advanced stride analysis. Invest in fundamentals, not gadgets.

[@apocMTL]

These gadgets help you fix your fundamentals quicker. Is that or a running coach. You choose.

[@fabsterun]

🥇 first 🥇

[@runningchannel]

🎉

[@fabsterun]

@@runningchannel still watching don't worry didn't come just to win the comments race

[@SuperYtc1]

"Running is simple. Just keep putting one foot in front of the other until you hit a target, finish a race, or just get bored." Said the Olympic runner and parkrun world record holder.

[@runningchannel]

😂

[@garydaniels4934]

Anna looks so, so bored! 😀 TBH it's a very dull subject.

[@runningchannel]

We might need to hide this one, Andy will get upset! ;-)

Heart rate monitor chest strap are too intrusive. They get wet with sweat and begin sliding down. If you strap them very tight they become more uncomfortable. So the waist belt pod is not only more affordable but much less annoying. Granted, it isn’t a heart rate monitor, but who seriously cares about your heart rate? The science behind training based on heart rate is flawed. It’s become one more of the numerous pseudoscientific fads so many runners and other athletes have fallen for.

[@PlutoDwarf-j9f]

I'm a new runner. Please explain why heart rate training is a flawed pseudoscientific fad. It seems so logical to me. If not gauging level of effort by heart rate, what is a better methodology?

[@pontshomatlhebegoane4716]

@@PlutoDwarf-j9f I agree. Four months into heart rate training and I consider it the best thing I have ever discovered in my training! I did a half-marathon a few days ago and just by glancing at my heart rate every now and then I could tell the level of effort. I was hardly bothered by the pace. And based on the data from training I knew exactly where I needed to be in order to finish the race comfortably.

[@bikes7777]

Anyone else think this dude is speaking MUCH too quickly? Almost impossible to understand.

[@neilbuckley5796]

No. It’s fine.

[@b4ds33d]

With the HRM Pro, you have to to use another device to initiate the activity. I start a run with my phone and leave it and the house.