When listen with heart, it makes my heart cry, it's so beautiful. No analysis is needed any more, thank you, Rupert!
@musicisthelanguageofthecos82664 жыл бұрын
Rupert Spira at the early stage of his teachings is truly awesome and he is actually preluding what will follow.
@MsSeb777712 жыл бұрын
This is the wonder of consciousness becoming aware of itself:) This is appearing in me
@exas000115 жыл бұрын
Brilliant Thanks for sharing We are all ONE Peace
@Joethebro10110 жыл бұрын
This is so true. Awareness doesn't need an object to be aware of itself. Awareness just is, and because you can be aware of being aware infinitely it means we are awareness itself. Finally new schools are opening called consciousness based education which says we are consciousness with a mind and body. Exciting to see. We used to think the world was flat, now we know it's round. Add this to our list of accomplishments!
@indianmilitary9 жыл бұрын
Sal C since when Advaita consciousness philosophy became a "western tradition"??. Adi-shankara 2000 BC (Hindu/vedic sage from India) was the first propound (from vedas) 'Advaita philosophy". Hindu/vedic high philosophies from Dvaita (dualism), Sankhya (non dualism and dualism) to Advaita (non dual) have already been validated by Double slit quantum experiment. It is also the reason why shell shocked quantum physicists from Erwin Schrodinger to Albert Einstein wanted to be cremated like Hindus. Obviously western Christian historians during colonial times post dated Adi Shankara to 9th century AD so that Buddhism can be shown older than Advaita. It was also done to fit all ancient Hindu dates with in the short christian timeline (that Universe was created in 4004 BC at 9.am) But Hinduism and modern science say that universe is almost 14 billion years old. A validated Hindu/vedic philosophy cannot be distorted and called as "neo advaita". West did not have any idea about consciousness philosophy (Advaita) until it colonized Hindu civilization or present day India in the 18th century It is also the reason why west did not discover any science or laws of nature (before 16th century) or until they caught hold of HINDU/VEDIC philosophies (in India) and the science which came out through the fractal mindset of brilliant hindu mathematicians, astronomers, surgeons, chemists, metallurgists until 18th century. Greeks from pythagoras to plato studied high philosophies and science in India or then Hindu civilization. So, let us not get carried away by calling something the west didn't understand until 18th century as "new school of thought"
@chebard15 жыл бұрын
Very Direct, Very Clear teaching on nondual nature and advaita.
@siddharthjain88517 жыл бұрын
no words can describe ur greatness rupert. hats off !!!!!!!!
@kolarz2128Ай бұрын
I remember watching it first time when I was around 16 years old :)
@sowti20009 жыл бұрын
You should rename this video by the last video you ll need on spirituality
@MrBalockaye13 жыл бұрын
You can say that whatever we are is limited, its limited to what we can experience with this body, touch, vision, smell and thought ect. We can not share thoughts with others or have same experience so we are limited in some aspects, this shows a division in whatever u may call this "energy" from one entity to another.
@nissargadatta14 жыл бұрын
Can anyone tell me what the music is in this video?
@Konradstob2 жыл бұрын
hi, did you find this music?
@crypto98613 жыл бұрын
just excellent logic for a mind to accept it as an expeirence. In other words, what an experience?
@beliefpatrol10 жыл бұрын
3:50 "I, whatever I am, and lets leave that completely undefined at the moment, we just kow that it is something that experiences, something that is conscious. that this I experiences the body, the mind, and the world."
@beliefpatrol10 жыл бұрын
great stuff, this is common sense approach to realizing the truth of who we are.
@beliefpatrol10 жыл бұрын
7:00 "we are that which knows or experiences, but also that, whatever that is has no objective qualities...if that is our direct experience at this moment, what makes us so sure that it is limited?"
@vincesina97868 жыл бұрын
+beforebelief all you can say about what we are is that we are. There is no limit to 'is'-ness.
@beliefpatrol8 жыл бұрын
Vincent Awaree Nice Vincent. Thank you!
@originalnormie3 жыл бұрын
I have seen Chris hebard in a Eckhart's video too
@sowti200010 жыл бұрын
Just wow
@andrew1k2 жыл бұрын
❤️
@jesuisravi15 жыл бұрын
este hombre puede llevar el gran premio en logica
@astheticrose9604 жыл бұрын
I saw his video for the first time., otherwise always sound recordings
@sporo200012 жыл бұрын
Finite means it has detectable boundaries, or that it is within an object with detectable boundaries. If its boundaries are not detectable, nor is it enclosed within an object with detectable boundaries, how can it be finite?
@mariajoseoviedoruiz62646 жыл бұрын
Porfavor traducción al español !! 🙏🙏🙏😳😳😭😭
@wonka412 жыл бұрын
The same thing he said in the video "Western masters of non duality". And i have the same question, if its unlimited why cant we experience or feel the chair or the floor or the walls in the same way we feel our body and we "see" our thoughts??
@AXharoth12 жыл бұрын
yes 100% agree
@threeoms14 жыл бұрын
sweet as honey, thank you!
@Sorlaize212 жыл бұрын
Because, your brain is biologically grown to experience the world using your senses. By no means does a brain have to only experience the world through senses, but that would require that we knew how to extend the brain into other parts of the world. You are not hooked up to a chair to feel it.. the chair is entirely divorced from mind-- it exists in another place. If you could hook up to the chair with WiFi, it's too narrow a data width, in each second, to communicate everything about the chair
@Sorlaize212 жыл бұрын
you haven't defined experience or consciousness your experience is ultimately part of a higher (physical-reality) process it cannot exist outside and divorced, from everything else You cannot escape light prompting your thought, or the temperature and humidity of the room changing the air pressure in the room which all disturbingly converges onto influencing who exactly and why exactly, you are you yourself in particular.
@ShaolinHero113 жыл бұрын
@alwaysdeeper are you awakened?
@xdfckt25646 жыл бұрын
Indians got it right 5000 years ago.
@B4N4N0N8 жыл бұрын
sometimes i wonder if my content is cancer, then i rest as the witness and let it go
@mikeyo123412 жыл бұрын
Our experience IS limited though. I can't read another person's mind. Therefore my consciousness or experience is finite. End of his argument sorry!
@Uberlaser12 жыл бұрын
'I can't read another person's mind' - What are you referring to as 'I'? If you are referring to the body/mind then yes, of course 'you' are limited. But that is not what is being explained here.
@keptyeti13 жыл бұрын
I don't follow the logic here. The act of self-awareness (the ability to be aware of or observe one's own mind or self) does not prove that the mind is infinite. Certainly not in and of itself. A computer can do calculations about itself. That does not make its hard drive infinite. There is an I. Why is there not an "I"?
@WestonPDX10013 жыл бұрын
The observer is hugely limited as it's produced and bound by a human body. Just because the observer can't observe itself, doesn't mean it isn't just an emergent brain quality.
@kolarz2128Ай бұрын
What's the proof of that? It could mean that but it also could mean something otherwise
@claytonmoss112 жыл бұрын
Rupert Shut up and have a cup of tea
@kingofaikido14 жыл бұрын
i wonder if this isn't a bit weak. the speaker hasn't answered the nyaya logician who says enlightenment is my own enlightenment. 'i' as spira employs it is a personal realization...so it is not as if oneness is about understanding other minds or dissolving one's personal consciousness in some cosmic oceanic bliss... the bliss is very subjective.. as spiro says: the 'i' looks at the mind, body and the world. but it is obviously still mine...and not someone else's... so, a limited oneness
@huangpaula12 жыл бұрын
surfspray1, you seem to have missed the point entirely.
@wonka412 жыл бұрын
Couldnt that apply as a proof of its limited nature?
@amitashi5 жыл бұрын
You don't see what I see. That's why you are limited. We are two percieving subjects. And where are two you can not be unlimited. Eye can't see itself but it is limited and one of many.
@avedic11 жыл бұрын
you made my brain hurt. :(
@alwaysdeeper14 жыл бұрын
useless mind chatter. people think that watching this stuff will give them "the answer" about reality. There is no answer. People selling "the answer" provide people with something that people wish they had, but it gives them nothing but "peace of mind" You can get that by not searching for meaning. There is none. This "answer" is as worthless as getting peace of mind by believing you have the "god's book" in your possession.