Russell: Idealism

[@hassan07e]

Thanks for these series I am a beginner in the Philosophy thing and am self teaching myself I think this book is kind of amazing to start with quite easy to understand the language of Russel and your explanatory videos strengthens the viewpoint

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

I am glad this has been helpful. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

[@fckinfruit]

so how far have you come now?

[@hassan07e]

@@fckinfruit not much been busy a lot

[@abdekgh34Uk]

Don't let less views and subscribers demotivate view . Lots of support and love from a student of philosophy

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

I appreciate the compliment. I should say that I am not a KZbinr. I make these videos for my students to use outside the classroom. I had thought about expanding the purpose of the channel, but then COVID hit and suddenly I had a lot more to do. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

[@abdekgh34Uk]

@@haugenmetaphilosophy It's my pleasure sir and Thanks to you.

[@hansenng1028]

So glad to have found this

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

I am glad you enjoyed the video. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

[@jimba6486]

Great camera, and discussion

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

[@jaickthomas1597]

In the first rejection, isn't Russell begging the question. I mean, his reason for saying everything is not mental is that it demands too much to be in the mind, i.e., it demands all the causal interactions to be mental. So, he says, that's too much to be in the mind. Hence, he says, it's not mental. But why would he go that far to make this argument. I mean, if the fact that there's too much in the mind is the problem, why can't it be the objects itself? There are infinite sense data, and we are sensing them. Then why is that not a problem to Russell and only the infinite causal interactions? So, when he says that's too much to be in the mind, and hence it's not mental, doesn't that beg the question?

[@aftabijaz1658]

True.love u dear Im from pakistan.Im well versed in English.im masters in English literature.Im preparing myself for further studies.

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

Good luck to you. I hope your studies go well.

[@exmuslimjunaid120]

Sir can you make a video on Russell monism (neutral, epistemological,meta) .

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

Unfortunately, I have a rather lengthy list of videos to make right now, and I am video production crew of one. In the meantime, may I suggest the following article from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell/#RNM

[@aftabijaz1658]

Which country you speaking from?plz

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

United States of America.

[@aftabijaz1658]

You should put on screen in written form wt u speak.

[@haugenmetaphilosophy]

I would like to do this, but it takes a lot of time-at least by any means with which I am familiar. These videos are set for CC and KZbin has automated CC captions. It is a little hit or miss, but it is better than nothing. A good number of the videos I use for my current courses are captioned; but I had someone helping me.