Russia vs NATO - Who Would Win? Military/Army Comparison (Compilation)

[@keitebrickman2069]

Ahhhhhh time for bed. Goodnight all you beautiful people 😘

[@ThatOneCubedEarther]

ok

[@derricklee4254]

Haha yes. I thought the same. 😂😂

[@darkbozo11]

if russia cant win in Ukraine... Theyd dreaming that they are in the same Legue as NATO

[@Tonny1980]

If the Russia 🇷🇺 can’t even take one country like Ukraine 🇺🇦 There’s no way they have chances fighting with nato 😅😅😅

[@undisturbed809]

Nukes war not guns

[@NoDrizzy630]

@@undisturbed809a nuke war would guarantee everyone dies. Thats not a win and remember the United States has technology no one knows about. The tech you are told about is outdated or only partial info not the true capabilities.

[@Germain-ys8zz]

@@undisturbed809no one wins when everyone is dead

[@undisturbed809]

@@Germain-ys8zz if Russia loose, everyone is dead

[@YiatCraft]

The video everyone needed but nobody asked for is here. Thank you

[@backing5284]

If Russia struggles against Ukraine theres no way Russia cld deal with half of nato

[@silverback5814]

You do realise they don't need to deal with nato because the second nato gets involved the nukes will go off

[@backing5284]

@@silverback5814 that'll never happen

[@stagg2158]

​@@silverback5814so do you so foolishly believe that it is not only Russia has nukes to fire off...putin don't want to die

[@markmagat9500]

​@@silverback5814that's the only thing that could make them win a war with western powers

[@falconcorbin3830]

​@@markmagat9500have you forgotten that no one wants a nuclear Winter?

[@Jkealy]

Under the pillow he goes time for sleep 🤣

[@jackGrty]

@@Jkealy under the pillow it goes but the headphones are still connected 😂

[@CJaide9939]

Surprised I’m this early on an infographics video

[@JD123-z6n]

Bro casually dropped a 4 hour video

[@paul_321]

🤖

[@KeiranYT]

Innovation will inevitably hit a ceiling, and we're starting to see the early signs of it already

[@justinrogers1807]

Let's be honest Putin is a poor man's warmonger trying to fight the real warmongering politicians

[@LilJonesy12832]

0:48 countryballs

[@miguelcintron9560]

Awsome video Great work. Wath in parts better so I can study and do some stuff and back to video and enjoy it. Review the video so keep update.

[@robertely686]

From the very first sentence, this 'history' is very poor. You've ignored the American led coup in Ukraine and the Minsk agreement, not to mention the continual encroachment of Nato around Russia.

[@steakinbacon8593]

Cool lies botskie

[@NoDrizzy630]

Cool story comrade but no ones buying it. And nations joining NATO is not encroachment, they just want security because russia cant be trusted.

[@blaircolquhoun7780]

This video was made before Ukraine's Russian invasion.

[@luffyland4996]

Its been 2 yrs and some 8 months, Russia still unable to beat Ukraine 😂

[@coleevans6007]

prime infographics show would’ve have 10k views by now

[@FromThentoNow97]

In a conflict between Russia and NATO, how do you think the geography of Europe would impact the strategies and advantages of each side?

[@stephenfowlie742]

Russia vs Nato, a test but no contest.

[@stephenmitts9958]

WOW the Trump statements didn't turn out well in the end. Also he was not a advisory to NATO but, when other countries don't hold up there end of the bargin. Do you expect him not to be upset? A lot of Americans are sick of footing European NATO defence on top of our own agreements.

[@Catonzo]

I do absolutely agree that NATO needs to cover its part of the bill, but you ALSO have to remember that only ONE country has ever actually called on NATO to fight in *their* war. That would be the US. For most other parts it has been an industrialized arrangement. The US has hardly gone out of this empty handed with it's military complex selling practically every advanced weapon that NATO countries have in their arsenal. If anything, Europe is risking great losses by allying themselves with the US.. because the theatre of war will be on Europe against Russia, much like WW2 and WW1 was against Germany. The US hasn't had to take noticeable loss of civilians over war on its own soil ever since your civil war, with most of it being terror attacks. Point is that unless you want to have to split your navy on two fronts, the Atlantic and the Pacific, as well as run the risk of losing control of Northern parts through Canada, you would do well to not antagonize NATO. Two of your four flanks is being held by that alliance. There were many morons on the left side here that thought NATO was no longer necessary.. don't fall into that trap just because you feel like other members do not pay enough. Most of us who do support NATO do feel the same, but don't consider it an alliance worth dumping just because of that. NATO is basically your chance of avoiding war and destruction on American soil. Dump that alliance and Europe might well scoff at any and all obligations to even attempt monitoring the Atlantic.. and the US certainly will not be able to get anywhere close to the same level of surveillance it does have now over Russia.

[@adss122]

How does this go for over 3 hours

[@jefreyallen8863]

Is the X47-B still in active service..

[@SoundwaveDevastation]

0:49 What..

[@surfdocer103]

Day one. NATO rules the skies, then owns the night.

[@BG-pd1nk]

Everyone is talking about how bad Russia is doing but my 16 year old son said something startling..."dad, hes like our cat...you ever notice he plays with his food before he kills it? And why would Putin use all his good stuff on Ukraine, shouldn't he save the good stuff just in case he has to go up against NATO? Could NATO actually win against Russia and China?...and if Ukraine is so strong lole everybody os saying, why are we supplying them with anything? That's like giving someone a gun that's already winning a fist fight"......i sat there speechless and grabbed my Vodka🤦🏾‍♂️

[@DT-Mainnet]

Vault-tec likes this comerzial 😉

[@mikeemanuel66]

Charles de Ghoul 👻

[@paul_321]

The audio was off

[@vortexgaming687]

Hello.

[@savazeroa]

first

[@veganboytoy3581]

@@savazeroa boo

[@vortexgaming687]

Why do you say first?

[@chupacabra304]

@@veganboytoy3581first comment on a new video, idk why, I see it all the time

[@midgarw6775]

4 hours! Yeah, you guys cover this topic way to much.

[@silverback8183]

The only thing russia has are nukes...and I'd be shocked if 80% of those didn't explode when launched!

[@undisturbed809]

Wishful thinker over here guys

[@whitehorse4318]

Always forget about stealth bombers and cruise missiles. Obviously never been to war.

[@aracoixo3288]

👋

[@colewolfe6475]

Why does he sound so different than he used to

[@floydlawsen]

Charles De Gualle not DeGool

[@DavidBoag-zy8ym]

the graphic at front of this video forgot that USA are nato members, russia wouldn’t dare.

[@JoeyRay-fz1qe]

It what a win means. Both sides don't have the power to take over each other but if you are talking about just shear destruction then Russia wins!

[@BrainNotFound-404]

Nah, I'd win.

[@grangling]

sleep time

[@cedryk5376]

Moldova is with EU. Lazy documentary

[@dawnherdman1942]

And that why putin would use nukes

[@phoenixreact-max]

Pls do a russian scenario

[@michaelgordon7554]

just came because ik this video will be very very laughably wrong and i could use a good laugh.... before i even start, if you say they will hold their own against even 1 nato member im laughing, they cant even deal with ukraine, how will they deal with a group of nations who have fought side by side for decades.......

[@undisturbed809]

Nukes, not guns

[@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я]

Ukraine is much stronger than all NATO armies. NATO does not have so many soldiers and combat experience (absent). Ukraine has been using US and NATO weapons for 2 years now. it's useless. The Russians haven't started anything yet. do not confuse the war against our cities in Ukraine and against NATO.

[@FromThentoNow97]

n a hypothetical conflict, it’s hard to say who would win between Russia and NATO. NATO has the advantage of collective military strength, advanced technology, and larger economic resources. However, Russia has significant nuclear capabilities, a large army, and home-ground advantage. Such a conflict would likely lead to severe global consequences. In your opinion, would a conventional war even be possible without it escalating to a nuclear scenario?

[@salonsospain]

457

[@jeffsenecal4168]

DEE GHOUL LOL

[@marianodidio3170]

no side can win cause nuclear weapons but putting that aside rusia cant even handle ukraine so kinda didnt need a 4 hour long video for this one

[@salonsospain]

773

[@DL-America1st]

trump 2024

[@AntonioFlordeliza]

nucs,nucs,nucs...this world need a scinister mind like putin....that is a nature ..devil,en angel,good en bad...but if putin sees that the alliance is solid he will definetly think twice...!!

[@kevincoyne2785]

I basically enjoy your content, but, your blatant liberal bias, demonstrated enough to be noticed, [yes, I have examples], I could do without.

[@mitchellgraber9448]

@kevincoyne2785 What are the examples?

[@kurlykrenins]

LOL Russia is struggling vs Ukraine alone. They would get rocked by NATO.

[@jasonfreedomofspeech]

Why was my comment removed. All i said is there should be a ceasefire and the war would be over.

[@stagg2158]

The war could end if Russia takes their troops home

[@jasonfreedomofspeech]

@@stagg2158 your allowed to say that soon as you say it the other way round, your comment gets removed.

[@TheBestDog]

Your U toob username sounds made up, a name a bot would use

[@SOCCER_BUNNY]

@@TheBestDogbecause 98.4% of all interactions on yt are bots

[@stagg2158]

@@jasonfreedomofspeech did you read your statement before posting it...because it makes no sense at all....how could it be the other way around when the Russians are the invaders....make it make sense...this is an adult conversation...

[@waichui2988]

Both will lose.

[@kolaowoseni]

Wishful thinking 😂😅😂

[@auro1986]

there is no nato when you are micromanaging there

[@rdavidwebb]

Who would win? Is that a joke? NATO would make russia unrecognizable

[@JoshuaOresanya-dj5lg]

Well said bruh

[@ゆみす魔王]

Lol no. Nato is a paper tiger.

[@outsideconfidence12]

Well not rly, it would be a draw no matter how strong nato is, nukes would fly and both sides lose

[@rdavidwebb]

@outsideconfidence12 if russias nukes even work. We're replacing all ours and I don't russia's even looked at theirs since they put them in. I doubt the russian soldiers would even launch them. The entire military knows putin is insane.

[@arya3193]

The only one who'll loose are the common people.

[@elricmagar9307]

And listen to independent journalists to know the truth about Russia like UN weapon inspector Scott Ritter

[@JosephAguinaldo-f4h]

You all wrong about Trump you are on the left side sad you should get your facts right !

[@ChadwicktheChadd]

Lol, russia doesn't even have a military anymore. 😂

[@Noble_OverDramaticShoeBOO1]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[@top-lul7540]

Both are losers

[@Cao-Cao-Blue-Army]

Darn

[@craig3949]

Poland beats Russia by itself

[@АндрейКондратюк-к2ъ]

Poland doesn't exist if Russia attack it.

[@GT5.0365]

lol Russia has no chance 😂

[@MostHigh777]

Is that a real question you're actually asking?