RX 7900 XTX - S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl

[@RTX4080-z4t]

UE 5 = unoptimized engine 5!!!

[@maroosagaming]

more like any game that has dlss/fsr, taa, unreal engine and unity and frame generation lol

[@ashurdraco1510]

And thats hilarious, do you remember that time when ue3 runned like a gold almost on everything ? 😂

[@Phumy]

@@ashurdraco1510 yeah and it looked like xbox 360 trash EVERY FUCKING GAME for almost 10 years! No graphical improvements for almost a decade because of fucking consoles! Get your shit together and buy better hardware. I wanna live in the future and maxed out those games look absolutely amazing.

[@QuisquamHam]

@@maroosagaming crutches for developers to rely on instead of optimizing and now the $1000 gpus can not do 1080

[@Jakiyyyyy]

It started to become a disaster since UE4 and UE5 just emphasized it even more. 🤷🏻‍♀️🥴

[@kuky4054]

I can't believe how many people are saying that this game runs as smooth as butter, we really need some psychoanalysis in the gaming world these days.

[@maroosagaming]

you forget that people are schizophrenic and think 60fps is smooth now with 40

[@Lockwood360]

Runs smooth on my 7900xt/7800x3d. Just your hardware probably. I play in 1440 .

[@strider029]

Runs well at 1440p in mine with 7800x3d/4080S, even in 7900XTX you can see in the video it is running well.

[@Lockwood360]

@@strider029 Right, i can play comfortably at native res or just choose a quality preset upscaler and have over 100fps. Not bad for what it is.

[@SweatyFeetGirl]

@@strider029 ofc it will run fine on almost the best gaming components on the market, but anyone with a non x3d chip or 1000$ gpu will have a much worse experience.

[@JustHavingBlast]

I can't believe that I paid 1000$ to pay game in 60FPS and that upscaling is mandatory to enjoy game. Gamers have lower standards than gold diggers, they at least get paid for bad experience

[@sanji663]

It's all because the masses does not appreciate higher res than 1080p

[@GTduzIt]

Really? Built for this one game only? 😂 I see even 4090s struggle with this game right now.

[@kardeon4503]

best comment of the day 😂

[@Reluctant_Hero]

The developers of Unreal Engine 5 say “you’re welcome”. 😂

[@eyescreamsandwitch52]

@@GTduzIt yeah UE5 is just ass

[@EswarnurderNamefrei]

You know, found your channel when researching for my new PC (still had my 2010 PC with DDR3 Ram and a i3 that I stuck a 1050ti in for life support in 2017). Even though I do not need to worry about benchmarks anymore now, I still watch some of your videos, because they are not dry unlike the other benchmarks on KZbin and you also do the really old stuff, which is nice to see and a bit nostalgic. GTX1650 in Stalker 2 reminded me of me using a GTX560ti to play RE7. Keep up the good work!

[@silverwerewolf975]

barely 60 at 1440p? godlord.

[@BAKTERIA1985]

CO? 46 W 4K A W 1440P 64\74 (15:23) CO TY OGLĄDASZ INNY FILM🤣. Ja na rx7800xt nitro+ mam 55/60fps

[@zhayward3190]

@@BAKTERIA1985 Yeah i don't believe you because you didn't even say what settings you used

[@BAKTERIA1985]

@@zhayward3190 he po co miał bym kłamać? w 1440p epickie bez dopalaczy mam 54/59

[@ard1an307]

@@zhayward3190 Im running it at High preset with RX7900XTX uv -25mv and it's 77-80 sometimes 50 in towns or randomly in zone.

[@ard1an307]

idk how he keeps his card on 55C tho, im on 67C with 98C hotspot

[@Terraah]

It's such a good game that it makes me want to keep playing despite running like shit

[@Rxdriguezz]

Good game..?Its empty and lacks content much..

[@zWORMzGaming]

Sure, I had fun playing yesterday for an hour on the 3060, even with some stuttering and 1080p / DLSS / 60 fps avg. It's still bad optimization though!

[@AlienAmongst]

@@Rxdriguezz bro never played the trilogy so probably his first stalker game

[@lukario223]

@@Rxdriguezz you're empty

[@gmorgcyborg]

​@AlienAmongst it's mine and tbo it seemed interesting at first . I do wonder what is the big hook? Im down to keep going once there some patches but enlighten me for those who haven't played the trilogy. What makes it good ? I even heard someone say if u were a fan this wasn't going to satisfy u

[@MEMETIZER]

The worst part is that on low settings it looks *waaaay worse* than something like Metro Exodus on Ultra, but runs 3-4 times worse on the same hardware. =/

[@RealMilkMan255]

Metro exodus aint even close to the scale of this game

[@ИзяШмуль]

Metro's vegetation is more worse than stalkers

[@kenshinhimura6280]

@@RealMilkMan255 Where's the sense of scale in STALKER 2? You get horrible popping from trees 30 meters away from you lol

[@adlibconstitution1609]

@@RealMilkMan255 Metro Exodus has so many maps that are beatiful, cant say the same for this

[@mrbobgamingmemes9558]

Maybe not as good but close enough, this game doesnt look much better but run like more than 3 times slower

[@MetalFreaken007]

i refuse to buy poorly optimized games anymore, i was really looking forward to stalker 2, but here we are. cant say i'm surprised, new games today badly optimized. worst part is people are okay with it. so have fun guys go play your nice stuttering game.

[@leerobinson8709]

Im convinced today's gamers are more interested in looking at their expensive PC hardware in their huge fish tank style case's with all the RGB bling to be caring about the games.

[@cocobos]

You don't have to, it's free on Game Pass 😅

[@MetalFreaken007]

@@cocobos game pass is a subscription for money. so no its not free. even if it was free i would not play it, why would i do that to myself? i rather wait.

[@cocobos]

@@MetalFreaken007 yes, for a mere $4.50 here (PC Game Pass).

[@cocobos]

@@MetalFreaken007 I've played the game and it's not worth anything. Never like the 1st one too.

[@bobsaget7589]

I've got a 9800x3D and a 7900xtx with 32 gb of 6000 ram and I need FSR frame gen to get decent fps in the starting hub area this game is cooked ☠

[@michaelthompson9798]

I agree. I’m on a 9800X3D, 32GB DDR5 6000 and RTX 4090. I feel bad for those rocking a GPU even older than a generation or two 😢😭and at a lower tier! But I’m waiting a few weeks for some game patches to come through before starting this title after the mediocre performance at the start🥰😇👍

[@proximacentauri3358]

At what resolution do you play? I bet its 4k TV.

[@bobsaget7589]

@proximacentauri3358 nah 1440p on a 32in TN monitor

[@TheLegendaryLeader1]

no its the amd gpu that sucks. i've had little improvement from the 2070 i had. AMD is garbage

[@77semka]

I have R9 7950X3D, Sapphire Radeon RX7900XTX, 64GB DDR5 6000 ram and this game running ok 3840x2160p average 170 fps using FSR3.1, without it all graphics epic 80-90 fps in 4K

[@peppascarf6213]

I just bought this card for 1000CAD I am so excited, but its coming all the way from Washington so i got to wait a week. I run 3440x1440p so this will be huge from my Rx 6800

[@markgergely4136]

very good gpu!! He was 13 months old, but unfortunately the power supply plug got fried, something sparked and he died they replaced it and it's the same again on my machine I wouldn't part with it for any money

[@peppascarf6213]

@markgergely4136 omg your profile picture is the exact same card I bought, making me glad I choose XFX 🤣

[@xyn_game]

You should wait for rdna 4, rx 8000 series

[@peppascarf6213]

@@xyn_game I'm not so sure, AMD is not targeting the High-end market as of the 8000 lineup, so I imagine performance would barely beat that of their 7900xtx for their flagship if they have one

[@jamesdoranto9013]

@@peppascarf6213 I had the same thoughts and just picked up the 7900xtx. It's far beyond what I use it for at 1440p gaming, I don't raytrace and the drivers have matured.

[@ChiBrianXIII]

That nearly 400 power draw is wild. Main reason why I skipped this gen of AMD and went with the 4000 series.

[@getbluespheres3k]

Oh where game optimizations have gone... even RTX 4090 sucks on this with native resolution as 60 FPS is NOT something to expect from that card. I hope FSR 4 behaves a great fix for FSR

[@kenshinhimura9387]

??? I'm getting over 100fps on my rtx 4090

[@getbluespheres3k]

@@kenshinhimura9387 DLSS off epic settings

[@ThaexakaMavro]

@@kenshinhimura9387 NATIVE smh 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

[@kenshinhimura9387]

@@ThaexakaMavro What resolution? I have no problem running this game @1440p all epic settings.

[@Lockwood360]

@@kenshinhimura9387 Theyre talking about 4k. Of course your 4090 pllays 1440

[@eikbolha5883]

Damn you are by far best game review content creator in a long time you are not amd or nvidia fanboy just show things how they are pretty great work. I also play this game with frame generation in 1440p with FSR native and epic settings cuz this makes my game run great and also i have my gpu all the time at 100% only problem is that camp are there is a lot of stutters but other than that its really fine but game is demanding also i have R7 5800gre and rx 7900gre and on that settings i mention i got around 75fps to 110 fps i dont know how my cpu doing this but i guess its work and until its work at least like this yeah im not touching that also im using anty lag its very good to have in this game but fun fact is that while running in game all around my GPU usage is still 100% and cpu usage is at 40 to 65% but im still ok cuz gpus is maxed out when is jump to camp hahahaha 66% cpu usually shit goes down when i start run thru camp CPU usage jumps up to 80% in some places not even joking and frame time jumps from 8ms to like 14 to 16ms at that time very niticable but this all is cuz UE 5 sadly also i like what you said about upscalers and frame gen and i can see that in many games even in game like cyberpunk cuz game run somehow good but its not optimized perfect like older games damn i remember when i have my gtx 1050ti any game i open and play run out of the box best it could also LOW, MED,HIGH or ULTRA settings no matter what if you gpu can run it ultra its always run it at 60fps thats what i miss in games now you buy 700or even more lets say 1000eur gpu and only like 30 to 40 min playing with settings how to make it run somehow diecent this is not okat all and yeah also the games used to have like 10gb or max 30gb thalker 2 have 160gb even tho its big game but lets say call of duty warzone 125gb damn far cry 6 165gb, the forza horizon zero down 72gb uncharted 127gb like this is huge issue in my opinion cuz before you be like 1TB of storage damn all my games can fit here now you be like 1tb of storage hmm 4warzones lmao.

[@ronjatter]

😂

[@SuperNinjaForever29]

i love watching your vids man. everyday on my day off i chill at home and watch most of your vids

[@avery6152]

i agree with you on the last opinion on frame generation and upscalers. its kind of annoying to see the requirements on the steam page are with upscaling.

[@unnamed715]

17:25 I swear, that ALWAYS happens when ever you say it, or even simply think it! It's like God is telling you "nah..."

[@Artemigus1111]

KRYZZP I love watching u so much when i: eat, before sleep, and when im really really bored, thank u!❤

[@zWORMzGaming]

Glad you enjoy it!

[@nikaqavtaradze5039]

hope rx 6800 is next

[@theSectClown14.88]

Спасибо за тесты! Очень детально и грамотно все разобрал.

[@andreasmoller9798]

Thank you the video i have been waiting for, run the 7900 gtx and ryzen 9 7900 x

[@pleasespam6949]

bro got the gtx amd card

[@E.Cristian7]

RX 6600 / 6650 XT / 6750 XT next? Kryzzp

[@houdini329]

I would really like, if you could elaborate on the visuals a bit more, when changing settings. "It looks fine" and "i wouldn't mind playing it like this" doesn't really help. Like... what changes with FSR performance? Or on medium settings?

[@rmwilliams8193]

“bUt, bUT tHe DevS wENt thRoUgH sO mucH”

[@JoeZocktGames]

If you think Performance takes a hit in this small settlement, wait until you get to Prypjat and the reactor :D You really need to do another benchmarking run with all GPUs there :)

[@HybOj]

THIS. PLEASE!! Yes, the perf is bad in this settlements u testing in KrizzP but get some save from someone or play a bit more and get to actual CITY. This is just 5 cottages and few stalkers, but there is a god damn CITY OF PRIPYAT hidden somewhere and other actual cities, I wonder what attrocities await there, and I dont mean the mutants :D

[@Jakiyyyyy]

I mean if it already runs bad on less demanding areas then we can expect worse, so no need to retest. 🤣🥲

[@November1121]

@@HybOjFPS anomaly awaits in Pripyat:)

[@theanglerfish]

Ooh i must have this game because you said reactor! Must see that 😵

[@sapinhoamigao4121]

Even turning FG on will not solve much because it increases input lag to an unplayable point.

[@kishaloyb.7937]

Enabling DLSS 3 FG also enables Nvidia Reflex as these 2 techs compliments each other. FSR 3.1 FG has some built in input latency mitigation, but Anti-Lag 2.0 just works better, but is missing in this game. So, until and unless Anti-Lag 2.0 gets implemented in more games, DLSS 3 FG will always have an advantage in terms of input latency.

[@Funnky]

I've tried FSR FG + NVIDIA Reflex and the input lag was noticeable even with 100+ FPS (after enabling FG, of course)

[@Ruqi_11]

I'm playing this at 1440p epic with frame generation at native resolution with the 7900xtx and the 7600x no overclocking or undervolting for both. Yes, I know the CPU is not as strong but I'm planning to upgrade to the 9800x3D as this was my intention when I got the 7600x at the start of AM5. So far the game is very enjoyable with no stutters and huge frame drops, well aside from the input lag everything is working well. I'm getting 115+ fps at most scenario's and sometimes it goes as low as 80 fps when I get into some heavy NPC area like the town in the lesser zone. The game really needs some major optimization enhancement as I would really want to turn that frame generation off. I know some people would rather play with a choppy experience over playing with frame generation, but for me the annoyance of a choppy experience and the inconsistent mouse movement is as bad as the delay that comes from frame generation, so might as well have some delay with a smooth experience overall.

[@realusunderscore]

i tried stalker 2 on the series s :o it was terrible 30 fps, AND A TON OF DELAY so i don't reccomend it on the series s yet

[@Andrew_Li_O]

Don't use frame gen if your pc can handle this game with just fsr etc. Also you can download a mod from nexus, it fixes delay, bugs, load time and few more issues. Give it a time and this game will shine. This is probably one game after cyberpunk which I really liked in two years, maybe total war Pharaoh too

[@yokingboii]

@@Andrew_Li_O well they can't really adjust the settings cause they said it was on xbox series s

[@Andrew_Li_O]

@@yokingboii ah welp, missed it. In that case it's better to wait for patches and fixes. I also know Xbox or ps have an input delay by itself, if you're using TV screen, adding lags from the game itself will definitely make it worse. Sadly

[@SemperValor]

Surprised the Xbox Series S was even able to run this game at all... This is a Xbox Series X/PS5/PS5 Pro/Mid-High end PC Type of game.

[@ramborambokitchenkitchen6357]

That’s pretty impressive considering the series S basically has the same gpu power as like a gtx 1070 maybe a little less.

[@sakki2405]

Amazing Video ❤❤

[@geeknproud321]

Ryzen 9 7900X3D/RTX4080 user here reporting great performance at 1440p max settings with no scaling or framegen. 50-80FPS running around the wilderness averaging near 70. 50-65-ish FPS in the beginner town average maybe 55. With DLSS Framegen I am consistently over 100FPS most of the time and gameplay is pretty smooth and artifact-free. My brother is having a similar experience on his 5950X/3090Ti rig with FSR. Framegen works great to interpolate ~50-60FPS into 100+FPS. It does not work so great to interpolate 30FPS into 60FPS. Also from our testing FSR 3.1 Framegen is pretty dang solid but DLSS 3.5+ Framegen still produces a better result.

[@garypinholster1962]

The problem isn't that Frame Gen isn't producing higher frame rates. The problem is the SIGNIFICANT amount of input lag from the button press to the action being seen on the screen is unacceptable. It's like having mouse acceleration and mouse smoothing on at the same time. It's terrible.

[@geeknproud321]

@@garypinholster1962 Thus why I say interpolating 50-60FPS(in my case 50-80FPS) into 100+ is far better than interpolating 30FPS to 60+. While you can reduce the latency added by Framegen somewhat you can never reduce the latency caused by running at low framerates. It will never work right for that. It can't make good performance out of bad performance. AMD have stated that FSR Framegen is aimed toward interpolating 60FPS into 120FPS. Nvidia have likewise stated that DLSS Framegen is aimed at interpolating 40FPS into 80FPS. Also, I would wager Nvidia's target is conservative marketing BS and really wants 50-60FPS to work well like FSR. Point being neither is really designed to do well at 30FPS and both require you to have decent performance to begin with. Particularly if you are well over 60FPS base framerate both will introduce negligible input lag while under ~50-60FPS the lag starts to creep in. Nvidia Reflex and variable refresh helps a little bit here as well. So guys running at 30FPS, Framegen isn't gonna help much. But guys running in the 40s and 50s like a lot of RX6000s and RTX3000s will do, a little resolution scaling and framegen is way better than nothing. Technologies like this work best when used conservatively.

[@Betonoszlop]

Krizzp released the monster on Chernobyl! 54 celsius looks great although its winter time there.

[@Apocalyptic47]

very good performance,you are the most reliable benchmarker imo

[@bumblefoot5]

4k is a tall order. 1440p , tsr ultra quality, hair medium, rest between epic and high depending on gpu. FSR frame gen if you want it to feel smoother with anti lag on. That was my best experience with a 7900xt overclocked and 7800x3d. Usually i hate frame gen. This one made frame time 8.5ms. highely playable. Upscale fsr shimmer drives me crazy tsr with frame gen was best. GPU hitting 99% usage

[@Baki-EGW]

10 more patches and it'll be great.

[@Baki-EGW]

@@MacTavish9619 Or that 😁

[@mehrabmirtaheri2878]

If you read this just drop a heart

[@Andrew_Li_O]

Stalker 2 is always a drop of heart, in a way of heart attack simulator)

[@AlienAmongst]

bro no need to go slaying like that lol

[@rezadeihool3121]

just droping a heart

[@hero4535]

I was about to comment on those white sparkles lol. You read my mind bro.

[@Biolic35]

Can u benchmark rx 7000 series mid tier gpus like 7600 ,7600xt and 7700xt

[@Gargentwitchongargee]

Sorry to tell you but he owns 7900gre and 7900xtx only and laptop 7000 series gpu

[@KamWysz]

I don't there is any point in him getting those 3 graphics cards cause he has 6600 xt 6700 xt and Rx 6800 which perform the same basically.

[@TheKrisztoforo]

Can u do a test with the rx 5700xt card?

[@Adrian-te3fz]

lock ~30fps on high settings ;/

[@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty]

It would be great to see more benchmarks of path tracing in games like Cyberpunk 2077 with your 4090, maybe in interiors and story areas with a spoiler warning. That game is just so insanely beautiful with path tracing. It truly is the Crysis of our time.

[@TheRagingRayn]

"Can it run Stalker 2" is the new "Can it run Crysis" meme.

[@JoeMaranophotography]

Dipped down to 30fps on an i5 13500 and 4070ti lol Its okay in non built up areas BUT DAMN ITS UNOPTIMISED AS FOOK! Edit! I fixed the issue by using TSR ultra quality which made my gpu use all it's power and is now pegged above 95% usage! So either dlss is bugged in this game or it's because I'm using studio drivers!

[@BigMan7o0]

I have a 7900XT and even with mixed quality settings (foliage tanks your fps and looks perfectly fine at low, I would recommend turning it all the way down) XESS at 66% res scale AND FSR3-FG I still get noticeable stutters/drops in come areas that aren't even the super heavy town early on. I still see as low as like 60-70 in the town with said upscaling and FG, neither my 5950x or 7900XT have ever struggled like this to run a game the closest I can think of off the top of my head would be Horizon Forbidden West which I get like 70-80fps avg at 1400p Ultra Native iirc. It doesn't even use a full CCD either, it could be using more CPU if it wanted. I have it set to cores 2-15 in Process Lasso so that the little bit of windows stuff on core 0 doesn't affect it, and even then it STILL can't saturate all 7c/14t, except for in shader compilation.

[@editorxd9306]

Please make a video on Asus RX 5500xt 8gb

[@ThisSkyMax]

In the good old days, my at that time cool computer Stalker did not pull, but now the PC is also cool, and the same situation, well, classic

[@kusumayogi7956]

What is blinking dot while you playing?

[@Qelyn]

Bro is flying out these uploads

[@schweiserschweiser3397]

It’s runing great at 7900xtx prety good card i hope they fix the cpu limit in some area.

[@ufopulse]

The Merc is such a sick card love it

[@ВасяПупкин-р7р]

What about RX 6800 XT? Do you have it? ))

[@trashbag5051]

This was my plan to upgrade for when there's a sale on the 7900xtx. Right now I'm on a 2080ti at 1440p But with a mix of medium and epic settings + DLSS + FSR3 FG it actually runs just basically almost the 1440p Epic/FG section (actually seems a bit better and more stable subjectively) so I might not upgrade anyway since the few graphics settings at medium don't bother me much. This is also the first game I'm using FG in and I have to say, not a huge fan. It feels almost as if I've turned on mouse smoothing or mouse acceleration. I got used to it by now but at the beginning it was awful. I read it has something to do with base FPS before FG but idk. And weirdly enough, Nvidia reflex low latency made it even worse. I guess that might be because of the weird setup of Nvidia dlss + AMD FG + Nvidia reflex.

[@ethan11114]

when are you getting the 9800x3d?

[@cigaretki]

Played it on 1080p Epic Graphics with a 7900 GRE. Going steady between 40 and 100 FPS without frame generation depending on where you are in the game. This game is demanding, to say the least

[@Palmeroide]

could you test the rx6600? thanks!

[@Pliskin2894]

I do agree about the Frame Generation and Upscaling rant towards the end, developers have been using them as crutches for a while now. It's a very fun game, but man is it being held back by this massively.

[@Capybarin]

First game where I saw 98% on my CPU 🫠 7900 xtx, 10700kf, 4K max settings: 75 fps....with fsr quality...and with drops to 40. Perfect

[@RidmakaX]

My favourite youtuber☺

[@JonnyGoodTimes]

Great video! I'm curious about MSI Afterburner. Does it conflict with Adrenaline at all? Does it override Adrenaline settings? I'm asking because Adrenaline likes to boost my 7900xtx well above it's boost clock, even on default settings. I have set my max clock speed in Adrenaline to override this, but MSI Afterburner seem more straight forward. Thanks again for the video!

[@thomasx767]

Stalker 2 apparently runs better on Radeon cards than on Geforce at 12:38 200 fps is quite convincing :)

[@vikieinstein]

My 7900xtx blowing hot in epic settings with 7950x3d fuelling from behind. Niceeeew

[@vincentdevalt3667]

7700 xt please?

[@exqziMOI]

Works just like GTA trilogy

[@sutapachakraborty9337]

Gta trilogy would get like 200 fps at 4k with this hardware...

[@exqziMOI]

@@sutapachakraborty9337 it's buggy and crashing

[@mrbobgamingmemes9558]

​@@exqziMOIthis one is not crashing but just run like slideshow

[@christohees9150]

Wow this is grazy 😂 the 7900xtx great 1080p card 👏

[@skyx1128388]

The dlss or fsr or frame generation is a software doing a trick to improve the game fps..not hardware..right?

[@carlosortiz8764]

The game is really pretty, but is very blurry and temporally unstable, you can disable TAA from the settings and although foliage looks extremely fizzy everything else is crisp and clean in movement

[@ivanzivkovic9630]

I will stick to the moded anomaly, looks awesome, runs smoothly, some will add the stalker 2 champaign so it will be like STALKER 2

[@marcmurcia1127]

Same gpu with 5800x3d. First game i enabled frame generation. Idk if it feels good, its a weird experience. The fps indicate +100 frames but it doesnt feel actually like it. This game really needs some improvement like the last of us

[@McLeonVP]

you use re bar? why not smart access memory

[@Lord_Tourette]

We must wait for Updates/Hotfixes. I play the Game at 3440 x 1440p all EPIC. I set max FPS in the Gamesettings to 60 and activate FG + FSR Native. So i get 120 Fps. Then i set Max FPS to 100 with RivaTuner so i get stable 100 FPS all the Time wit much lower Inputlag. Only way to have Fun in this Game at the Moment. I play with 5800X3D + RX7900XTX.

[@b3at2]

Honestly good luck. The old stalker was just as bad … its these devs.

[@themonster7952]

игра опережает развитие видео карт )

[@m41a1z]

what the heck got me🤣🤣😂 21:00

[@samuelkomolik1103]

I play on OC Nitro+ 7900XT and in 4K with FSR quality+ FG i got 120 FPS on high/epic without RT. Native is like 55 FPS. FG feels ok on TV but horrible flickering on Monitor

[@sergestar4536]

Can we get optimized settings I wonder if there are mods

[@okuniigaming]

@3:46 why does the game have white dots? is your gpu breaking?

[@okuniigaming]

@@MacTavish9619 thanks bro but I was just joking with him xD

[@itouchgr4ss]

Thought im going crazy seeing my 1000$ rtx 4080 drop to 40-50 fps in 1080p. Guess im not the only one

[@roberthill5476]

hello mate, can you make a video tutorial on how to enable resizable bar

[@Alliwantedwasapepsi]

Is RX 6600 satisfactory? Other benchmark channels give varying performance.

[@jakiskana5157]

I play this game with rtx 3070, 16gb ram and i5 10400 and im playing on 1440p with most of settings on high (im using epic textures) with dlss balanced and fsr frame generation and i have 90+ fps and about 60fps in zalisja village because im cpu and ram limited. Sometimes i have bigger drops (to about 30fps) in zalisja village but saving game and then loading last save helps but i played like 12h and only 2 times i had this situation. Overall my experience is ok, i thought it will be worse.

[@raresmacovei8382]

4K, Performance Upscaling, Frame Gen, 80+ fps is the future /s or no s

[@amanfromhungary]

Oh I just noticed your Meze 99 neos. I love mine :D

[@mrbobgamingmemes9558]

True, wukong look much better and run much better too, even compared to other UE5 survival games palworld this run like 2-3 times slower

[@krishankantsoni4414]

On upcoming patch update can we run smooth on GTX 1650 Got fps atleast 40 stable?

[@martapfahl940]

I was using Frame Generation from FSR on my RTX 3080 and I was getting really weird clipping, artifacts and crashes... I dont konw man this tech doesnt like me.

[@southbronxny5727]

You could set display to 60hrz and then lock frames at 60fps and then turn on BFI.....That would be butter smooth.

[@cezarbanuca8360]

Notebook: i5 13th , 16GB ddr5, ssd, Rtx 4050 140w it’s unplayable on fhd low dlss frame gen, I get 80-9fps drops every 10s or so BUT it works a bit better with FSR

[@justfun5479]

I was waiting for this video. 1440p Epic or 4K Epic FSR Quality?

[@essn6807]

FSR quality at 4k would give you a better image

[@yancgc5098]

You gonna test it with the 6900 XT? If you still have one that is

[@fpshunter]

Great GPU for native 1080p 👍 😅

[@TheJozekldz]

7950x3d , 4x32gb ram, rx 7900xtx 24gb ASUS TUF and works 60fps all the time no matter you chose TXA TSA or FSR native AA or Quality whatever.... 60fps all the time no stuttering.

[@robinrufino8244]

Very solid that gpu

[@lxst16]

FINALLY YOU GOT A 7000 SERIES AMD GPU

[@jakecolon7307]

are you gonna do the 4080 super??

[@HybOj]

Yes the perf is bad in this settlements u testing in KrizzP but get some save from someone or play a bit more and get to actual CITY. This is just 5 cottages and few stalkers, but there is a god damn CITY OF PRIPYAT hidden somewhere and other actual cities, I wonder what atrocities await there, and I dont mean the mutants, but the stutters :D

[@auzziebridger]

Can confirm, even the 9800x3d and a 4080s stutters like mad. It's unfortunate, the gameplay and story are great. But the performance and intermittent crashes take me out it.

[@bo-xmusic6940]

Those graphics are honestly kind of underwhelming considering how demanding the game is.

[@daniil3815]

Why does it use 1-2gb more VRAM than Nvidia gpus?

[@knightlydude777]

I wish you could disable nanite and lumen in ue5 games..

[@plantythepottedplant6316]

I really don't understand. Major realeases on consoles used to be a guaranteed experience that it would work, now 2000 dollar machines with high-end 2 year old hardware are struggling to get the touted 60fps that pcgamers often raved about. At 1080p, a resolution that's been the standard for a decade. WTH is wrong with them??? EPIC for not optimizing their engine GSC for not making compromises or choosing a better system and anyone not complaining for enabling this **** Why are major companies relying on ME to have the best, most up-to-date hardware known to man so I can run the 60 Dollar game I'm already paying them for.

[@Blueeyegamer2657]

Why don't buy rtx 4060 Ti 16gb ?🙂

[@CrazO9111]

Cause its a Bad GPU.

[@blackened1231]

How do you manage to have such low temp on 7900xtx? Especially on 4k?

[@iLyaWater]

Please 7900XTX + XeSS? Against FSR

[@yokingboii]

XeSS generally looks better with similar performance, there's alot of comparison videos.

[@pakvlv]

@@yokingboii It doesn’t look better, I compared TSR FSR and XESS and XESS flickers the most on grass and trees, worse than other upscalers.

[@deathtoinfidelsdeusvult2184]

@@pakvlv opposite for me. FSR just looks worse. XeSS with their new updates are little more softer though.

[@robinrufino8244]

I think xess in this game look very soft, i prefer fsr for this specific game

[@SemperValor]

FSR 3.1 is better than XESS... FSR 2.2 XESS is better.

[@9-ac-7]

When it was being discussed by our friend group about a year ago we thought that we could all properly play it, now i guess me with a gtx 1070 and an i7 7700 woupd have to take some serious compromises to even get a proper 60 fps

[@laszlodajka5946]

Mm maybe check out nexus mods. Some people say modders already shared some performance tweaks. And im sure devs will come up with updates too