320.23 Cables in Accessible Attics

  Рет қаралды 4,917

Ryan Jackson

Ryan Jackson

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 10
@ROBERTELECTRIC1
@ROBERTELECTRIC1 Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Nice explanation. Finally understood what is the attic rules. Thank you and God bless
@davidpanysr2854
@davidpanysr2854 Жыл бұрын
Certainly appreciate your video's and awareness of compliance.
@stillthakoolest
@stillthakoolest Жыл бұрын
Yep, I think a lot of people misinterpreted that. Just curious why this change wasnt in 300 instead of 320? Most people wouldnt think to look there, especially if it applies to all cable wiring methods.
@rickbilbrey3235
@rickbilbrey3235 7 ай бұрын
What about areas of the attic where the ceiling/roof sheeting or framing is very low due to pitch of the roof? Ie. Where is to low to WALK on the cable?
@RyanJacksonElectrical
@RyanJacksonElectrical 7 ай бұрын
The code doesn't address it. I thinknit should only apply to locations with more than 30" of headroom, but it doesn't say that.
@MatthewSwiftGloucester
@MatthewSwiftGloucester 7 ай бұрын
This is the only video of yours I can find which speaks of armored cable. I want to suggest you do a video clarifying the NEC status of pre-1959 (?) armored cable which does NOT have an integral bonding wire in the armor. For brevity, let's call that wire type AC-O for "old" AC. NEC gives clear rules for even older knob and tube wiring, but leaves AC-O in limbo. NEC 2023 definition of "Type AC" includes AC-O ("A fabricated assembly of insulated conductors in a flexible interlocked metallic armor."), though that definition is so broad it includes some kinds of MC and other wire types as well, so the definition cannot determine the scope of Article 320 which gives rules for AC wiring. Article 320.100 EXcludes AC-O by requiring type AC wire to have an integral bonding wire. On the one hand, AC-O is closest to modern AC so common sense says 320 applies, but on the other hand, AC-O is significnantly different than modern AC because the armor is (today) never recognized as an EGC, even if 320 is followed: 320 has assumptions which are not met by AC-O. The forums just have flame wars on this topic; it would be great to have your view.
@jeremiahnewsom7775
@jeremiahnewsom7775 Жыл бұрын
Excellent!!!!!!!thanks!!!!!!!
@Dpknox
@Dpknox Жыл бұрын
The rumor bird has it Tennessee's adopting the 2023 code are you going to be teaching any classes in the state in the near future?
@saltyroe3179
@saltyroe3179 Жыл бұрын
1929 knob & tube attic, if you touch the cable the insulation falls off. Until recently new wiring had to be pulled through metal conduit. Now NM cable is ok. More concerned about protecting loom and old rubber and cloth insulated wire. The attic is not a place for amateurs. It is fire safe, but not idiot safe.
@yaqdhanmerzah349
@yaqdhanmerzah349 Жыл бұрын
Thanks
334.24 Bending Radius
6:07
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 2,7 М.
2023 300.5 Underground Installations
8:08
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 4,5 М.
Une nouvelle voiture pour Noël 🥹
00:28
Nicocapone
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Quilt Challenge, No Skills, Just Luck#Funnyfamily #Partygames #Funny
00:32
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
When are grounding/bonding bushings required in the NEC?
40:36
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Electrical Home Runs
7:37
Electric Pro Academy
Рет қаралды 96 М.
Transformer Basics Explained: From Windings to Voltage Ratios
12:33
GA Central Electrical
Рет қаралды 848
ROMEX Cable Support Requirements (2024)
11:38
Backyard Maine
Рет қаралды 356 М.
Kitchen islands and peninsulas in the 2023 National Electrical Code
17:14
2023 NEC changes: GFCI protection (210.8)
32:47
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 108 М.
680.26 Equipotential Bonding (swimming pools and similar)
23:32
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 8 М.
760.33 Surge Protection (for Fire Alarm Control Panels)
6:20
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 2,6 М.
NEC 210.70: Required lighting outlets
20:38
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Electric vehicle circuit sizing (NM Cable)
12:36
Ryan Jackson
Рет қаралды 9 М.