Historian Reacts - The Presidential Assassination Nobody Talks About by Sam O'Nella

Рет қаралды 15,150

Ryan Peterson

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 17

@RyanPetersonReacts 4 жыл бұрын

remember, the bible says it, ya must acquit if it don't spit lol

@andreicadari700 4 жыл бұрын

More Sam O' Nella!

@nero7469 4 жыл бұрын

Yes

@-gemberkoekje-5547 4 жыл бұрын

Sam of the Nella

@priesttakanaka144 4 жыл бұрын

A great bible quote

@MrMG-il5hv 2 жыл бұрын

Poor William McKinley

@sophiepalmer-doran344 4 жыл бұрын

more info On July 2, 1881, Charles J. Guiteau fired two bullets from his Bulldog .44 at Garfield. One caused a superficial arm wound. The other entered in the right posterior thorax, fractured rib 11, traveled leftward and anteriorly into the L1 vertebral body, then lodged about 2.5 inches to the left of the spine, below the inferior border of the pancreas. For some period after the shooting, Garfield was fed rectally After the shooting, Garfield was treated with high maintenance doses of quinine (5 to 10 grains per day) and morphine (one-fourth grain daily), frequent sips of brandy, and a single dose of calomel. Garfield had chronic abdominal symptoms during his convalescence. They were ascribed to the calomel by one of the homeopathic practitioners attending him Garfield died 80 days after being shot. The cause of death has usually been described as either: (1) rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm, or (2) pyemia. In fact, his death was probably due to ischemic heart disease. At his trial, the assassin Guiteau admitted shooting the President, but denied killing him. Instead, he claimed that Garfield's physicians killed him. Although Guiteau was executed because his defense was not strong enough, he was probably correct. Garfield's original wound was 3.5 inches long, and ended with the bullet lodged in a harmless part of the abdomen. The wound was probed by the fingers of numerous physicians during the rest of Garfield's life so that, by the time of his death, the wound track was 20 inches long and oozing pus. It seems reasonable that the terminal event in Garfield's life was a myocardial infarction. However, the wound could have contributed to the terminal event in three ways, all of them derived from the fact that Garfield was mightily infected for a period of 3 months: It seems reasonable to suppose that Garfield had anemia of chronic disease, which would have lowered the ischemic threshold. Chronic infection could have led to amyloidosis. If it affected the heart, then it is not surprising that an ischemic event would have been so rapidly fatal. It is becoming increasingly clear that coronary atherosclerosis is an inflammatory, perhaps infectious, disease. It is possible that Garfield's chronic inflammation and infection could have accelerated atherosclerosis. doctorzebra.com/prez/g20.htm

@jinolin9062 4 жыл бұрын

Sophie Palmer-Doran could you give me an autograph after washing your hands Einstein!?

@SmurfsAndRaspberries 3 жыл бұрын

I love your channel... And do I dare to say, that you have some of the most beautiful blue eyes and smiles I have ever seen.

@ms_scribbles 4 жыл бұрын

Yeeeah, it's true. A nobody from the half of the country still considered traitors by a lot of people vs. a fucking WAR HERO. Gee, I wonder why Greely lost...