S1mple Takes A Reaction Time Test! (Best of S1mple Ep. 02)

[@Infin1tas]

0:18 typical CS player, tries to prefire lol

[@hail3010]

True

[@Yh-tc7db]

Infin1tas - Composer he was doin it the whole time

[@nyox2978]

It isnt Always pre fire That happens To me always its natural

[@xpb3436]

@i dont need your help thanks you just edited it lmao

[@c8h_233]

when you wait for too long you start to lose focus, and reaction time, so he was resetting it

[@theharpy6644]

In comments you can find evry person from genetic 0.01% who has reaction time under 140ms but be gentle, they are here not to brag, just to inform you how great they are

[@zelven6109]

mine is 187, almost as fast as s1mple. people say that the fastest was 200. i guess gamers are the true reflex gods

[@eggmeister6641]

Only 140? Mine is - 10ms. I shoot them before they peak me.

[@zelven6109]

@@eggmeister6641 *behind u*

[@csrix]

@@zelven6109 above*

[@eggmeister6641]

@@zelven6109 I know

[@Ashterrs]

Greatest CSGO player avg is close to 200ms Meanwhile in comment sec,everyone is 100-140ms being silvers You can be human benchmark pro

[@zalty8556]

i got aorund 170 always no guessing

[@espada1607]

@i dont need your help thanks you are 100% guessing right?

[@stillnotchill2560]

All these people with 140ms hit it a few times and lie it's their average, and even if it was, it's easy to click a giant green screen, these are the same people who empty a whole clip spraying and don't land a single shot

[@theplanespotterguy]

Ashter No im 45ms

[@urmpm3901]

@Aviation Enthusiast how nigga how honestly sounds like straight cap

[@justasimpthathasnomoney7411]

This proves that you can be the best without having inhuman reactions

[@adrianol999]

Meanwhile I’m chilling at 300 ms

[@adrianol999]

*edit 325

[@AimPerfectly]

Adriano Leona when I test my reaction on those online tests it's like 280 but when I test in real life or when actually playing a game it is so much faster. No idea why.

[@akumacs9786]

Lol mine is 375 :[

[@justasimpthathasnomoney7411]

@@AimPerfectly probably because of how exited you are when your about to get a kill cause reaction time test are just boring

[@advikdeshmukh805]

Ok here’s the thing, ppl may flex being able to see the color green faster and clicking... however in Csgo, there are minute movements that u must recognize and react to which this man can do very fast

[@owenchow95]

TheSlimyNoodle Cough cough sees the guy and still misses the flick (typical cs player)

[@stillnotchill2560]

Click green screen fast < put crosshair on head and click first

[@kappasike]

i dont need your help thanks no one cares lmao

[@kushalbhalerao1463]

exactly. S1mple hasn't trained himself for a fast reaction in real life but for fast reaction in csgo which has lead to his real life reactions being above average

[@lidiouz1439]

Yeah kinda true honestly. I struggle getting good reaction on human bench mark but for some reason I feel faster on csgo.

[@lukesu4736]

Damn dude everyone sharing their reaction times. I guess s1mple’s just the slowest player compared to all the randoms in comment section.

[@17coal68]

Would still easily 1 v 5 them though lmao

[@trex8656]

The test doesn’t really work, depends on ur internet and ur mouse, but in reality when ur gaming, it depends on your movement, muscle memory, Ingame reaction time with the stress.....The test is stupid, only used for bragging rights and contributes nothing

[@trex8656]

Logan mate I get an average of 250 on my normal mouse, when I use my Logitech gaming mouse I get an average of 190, when I did the test in a gaming place that have great internet I got an even better score, youre only defending it because you think it means something

[@jackbrian7083]

@@neo4436 200ms isnt bad. that shits better than average. average is around 250 mate

[@jackbrian7083]

@@neo4436 you arent playing against cs pros. Cs pros are the top 1 percent of the top 1 percent. And the minimal 40ms difference war uldnt matter with anything except an awp when Holding Angles.

[@rosed5087]

s1mple is so good he even prefire the test

[@stevieboi3319]

250 ms gang rise up!

[@atillaerenemreerol8572]

i think hz of ur monitor and ur mouse affect it so much tho

[@cgkumar6780]

@@atillaerenemreerol8572 nah

[@efloof9314]

@@atillaerenemreerol8572 im doing this on a shit android and got a 204 average and 206 average on my second try.

[@jondoe1404]

s1mple is one of the greatest CS players of all time and his reaction speed isn't even crazy inhuman. He's above average, but not crazy insane.

[@fica1137]

His true reaction time is probably around 150, I watched some other pros take on the test but they tried it multiple times so it averaged out and their reaction times were all below s1mple. S1mple could probably get 150 reaction time if he did it few more times

[@jomezpereito4469]

@@fica1137 that is called warm up i guess? Guess d1mple no warmed up there?

[@Z3t487]

@@jomezpereito4469 It was clearly the first time he did the test, i'm sure he can do better.

[@WhiteZet1]

Not necessarily even above average. A lot of ppl taking this test don't have proper equipment. I remember hitting 200-250 every time I attempt this when I was like 15-17 with bad equipment. Now I have a different mouse and monitor and it's 155-175

[@nhoang1607]

​@@fica1137😢😢

[@ax1s663]

This makes me feel better

[@itztoxictv]

To be fair hes just chilling at home, itd def be better if hes in the heat of a tournament

[@affentaktik2810]

He was just calmy sittin there and got 167ms wtf if he was as concentrated as in the game he‘d easily do 140 consistently imo

[@denn7s]

🧢

[@AN-bo3im]

my times are almost the same as his, but my CS skills are not even one hundredth of his.

[@GrabbaBeer]

People do not understand here that anything under 150ms is not reaction time. It’s timing. The brain cannot complete its optical circuit faster than 150ms. So anything below that is you timing the click or guessing.

[@GrabbaBeer]

@@Bob-pc5sm my physiology teacher wouldn’t agree with that. What I stated is a medical fact. As stated before, anything below 150ms is timing. Also this program which I’ve used in that video isn’t a reliable source. It could be coded with an adjustment for input lag for a standard mouse, which he does not have due to the mouse he bought. This could be why the time is faster, or it is just timing. We do not know, you’d need a controlled scientific method to show this. As which has been done before in neuroscience. It’s not hard to time these tests and guess.

[@Z3t487]

@@GrabbaBeer I did 147 3 times in a row, i guess i got good timing yesterday, lol. Razer Viper 8K (mouse) and 390 Hz monitor.

[@GrabbaBeer]

@@Z3t487 yup that would be timing, that’s why In boxing. Timing always beats speed as well.

[@davidatlihan9235]

@@GrabbaBeer there are people who consistently get 110-120 ms every single time

[@GrabbaBeer]

@@davidatlihan9235 and that’s is timing. Not reaction time.

[@prophetzarz4786]

reaction time isnt everything in csgo, its also important to have very good hand eye coordination or your gonna miss

[@claudbtw]

167 is actually insane

[@theharpy6644]

And yeah guys i got 10ms average reaction time, not even sorry for those losers with reaction time over 11ms

[@MinZilla]

I'm over here with 350ms

[@napalms5820]

@@MinZilla how? thats so far below the human average

[@MinZilla]

@@napalms5820 ik and I just hope it's because of my cheap wireless mouse and 60 hz monitor

[@vitaminnc6443]

Yea irght you did, don't lie to yourself too, hah, the highest possible a human could acheive on that test, would be 100 ms, and that would be if you have eaten healthy, and taken supplements, aswell as being really smart.

[@vitaminnc6443]

@@MinZilla Don't worry it is delay, of your mouse, and screen. I know that for certain :D

[@csskrouble]

i have same reaction time as s1mple lmao

[@trololollolol2566]

This time when u have better rraction time than simple

[@Poatanenjoyer123]

Im sure he's faster than dat

[@relog]

ingame hes faster obviously

[@tallast5043]

relog None is, it just feels like that

[@SkKedDy]

I took that reaction test and i had a 300 ms

[@SkKedDy]

Took from another site and got a 230

[@SkKedDy]

Took it on my phone and got a 350

[@keer6295]

my reaction time after using illegal anime websites

[@notremo1493]

lmao. get ublock origin btw

[@keer6295]

@@notremo1493 your clutch , im late , thnk u

[@marianodelcampo1025]

everyone in the commentary section: i got 0.100 im god im faster than s1mple (nova 3 players)

[@frespects9624]

I got .1 ms kid, ur bad

[@yannik246]

I usually get a good average but my reaction times vary a lot

[@Rykeron]

Good to know a pro has similar reaction time as me 🤓

[@xXsergentXx1]

Oh so my avergae reaction time of 195ms isn't actually that bad! Good to know

[@thememelord6510]

sorry i dont remember asking

[@xXsergentXx1]

@@thememelord6510 cool good for you

[@haxxah]

@@thememelord6510 Your mother doesn't remember asking for you either.

[@thememelord6510]

h a x t h I didn’t ask bud

[@haxxah]

@@thememelord6510 ^^

[@GREIF_YT_UA]

I have around 200ms,after watching few youtubers who beat it about 125ms i became upset. But when greatest sniper of cs:go have almost same reaction time as me, i not upset anymore

[@Ethernet-q5o]

people that say you NEED a 144hz monitor be like:

[@fica1137]

144 hz gives you like 30-40 ms advantage over 60 hz monitor though. Zywoo did a reaction test in live studio on something that is likely to be 60 hz screen and he got around 200 ms average which is really bad compared to how he does in game

[@scream8189]

and people say it really doesnt matter if your opponent is on 10 ping and u r on 60

[@jesukxd8494]

It does

[@niiwo]

this proves reaction time doesnt matter. i have better reaction time than s1mple and im on 60 hz. this guy is the best player in the world.

[@rodrigosalinas8749]

L0wen response time does matter, but it’s not big difference in .2 seconds it’s too fast but your skillz also depends on multi things not just your response time

[@niiwo]

@@rodrigosalinas8749 I agree, but it kind of shows that as long as your reaction time isnt something crazy bad (like 300ms+) you're probably fine if you have the skill

[@cokguzeladam]

True same here man

[@iamcrystalwater2221]

Having 120ms and being good doesnt prove anything actually You can be good at clicking when you see something green and be a sloth when it comes to flick and playing in the game

[@eggmeister6641]

It's useless to measure reaction time like this. There are two main forms of reactions, one of which being cognition. In humanbenchmark, your brain has to look for a change in the environment and then determine whether or not the change warrants a response. The other type of reaction is the "startle response", which happens when you're exposed to a sudden high-intensity stimulus. Players like JW become very sensitive to stimuli when their adrenaline spikes, which is why he manages to shoot some people within 100ms of them peaking him. For more info: www.blurbusters.com/human-reflex-input-lag-and-the-limits-of-human-reaction-time/2/ TLDR: humanbenchmark uses your brain too much + being startled makes you shoot faster Edit: Sound is most effective at creating a startle response.

[@konataluckystarkonatalucky7729]

Someone who actually kinda knows what there talking about, nice

[@SpiffyCS]

That central nervous system does come in handy

[@trea552]

I took a reaction test once that the last one was actually a jumpscare. went from 185 average to 110. every time with the startle... in the game im pretty shit tho. 30 fps on low res makes me not even see them.

[@SpiffyCS]

@@trea552 I used to play 30 fps on a Mac Mini. Now I play 200 fps on a laptop lmao

[@trea552]

@@SpiffyCS well? Did it make a difference? In reaction time?

[@MinZilla]

I'm just chillin' here with 350 ms Honestly hope it's because of the fact that I'm using a wireless mouse and a 60 hz monitor cuz that's pretty fucking slow

[@dragonbuu1788]

im using a wireless mouse, its the razer viper ultimate

[@MinZilla]

@@dragonbuu1788 I'm using a 10€ logitec mouse

[@ggggg148]

@@MinZilla a bad wireless mouse has a huge delay you shouldnt be using that for gaming

[@MinZilla]

@@ggggg148 Ik but I'm also broke

[@SwainixFPV]

A wireless mouse polling at 1000Hz today doesn't make a difference if it's a good mouse. If it's shit it makes a big difference... I tested with a 60Hz screen and got 230 average, got a 144Hz screen since and got down to 180/190 average so makes quite the difference

[@float7976]

damn bru this man better than me and his reaction time is 50ms higher

[@aliyasdeogam4373]

The truth is that everybody has equal reflexes what matters is ingame focus

[@patootie3529]

Uh... no they dont

[@TheAstroG]

@@patootie3529 Yes they do!

[@peacock9473]

​@@TheAstroGwdym????

[@Now._.Listening]

OH MY GOD INHUMAN REACTIONS

[@lettuce9796]

That was not inhuman, there is a ton of people who has better reaction time. For example I have 160 seconds(avarage). Simple is good Cuz is aim and game sense

[@amirix5202]

@@lettuce9796 for having a reaction time of 160 you sure are pretty stupid.

[@patootie3529]

@@lettuce9796 tHaT wAs NoT iNhUmAn check global average

[@Ilovemelanins]

Lettuce yeah I’m pretty sure if it was the one were you had to drag your mouse to the green dot he would have faster time than most

[@melegattie4116]

185ms average on 144hz, if I try it on 60hz I get arround 210-215 at best

[@JustJay2207]

144 hz i get around 190 ms but 60 hz 210-230 atleast XD

[@lanaiefn4949]

zer0 YT 144hs I get 120-150, on 60hz I get 180-210. It’s just that I just switch to 144.

[@danielebignardi4757]

@@lanaiefn4949 you are a superman

[@BansheeBaby]

NGL i do the test on a 60Hz i didnt even think about it lol. My average on 60Hz is around 235.

[@Trooson]

I get even better on 60 hz lmao

[@caramelizedboi8832]

My average is 175 but My in game reaction time is like 400 lmao

[@katakouzina]

200+ here and yes in game i am so slower

[@urmom-qm9cu]

same for some reason its like that

[@nob8995]

Aye he was playing Kota the friend as the bgm

[@Jmvars]

Would be interesting to see what happens if he concentrated and tried hard because I can get the same score as him. I doubt I'm really as fast as him.

[@ashishpatel3267]

Trick is to look for red❤️ to fade not green 💚to bloom

[@schabigerlump]

I have ingame up to below 100ms and at humanbenchmark i usually dont go below 140ms so the humanbenchmark is SLOWER due to being running in javascript.

[@Benjamin-lt6nk]

But everyone who uses human bench mark will also have the same delay. So his reaction time should be compared to the graph.

[@Z3t487]

@@Benjamin-lt6nk Everyone has different mouse and monitor...even the right settings in the graphics card drivers can make a difference.

[@klever2183]

I tried this shit at 3AM like simple, that's really hard after few boring games

[@mob5054]

My highest was 24 and tbh I felt like I didn’t see the green lol

[@mob5054]

God i think I did

[@code-one9879]

when I get a score of 86 me: I am a perfect candidate to become a god

[@ghostlv4030]

200ms is normal. 160ms is super!

[@swagswag6286]

Well I thought he was faster as it looks faster when he plays

[@callmeacutekitten3317]

Instinct my friend

[@patootie3529]

@@callmeacutekitten3317 no it's called game sense, instinct won't just make u randomly shoot just coz u feel like it and u hit an enemy that just came in the door through ur genetics, u get that by practice

[@youngcitybandit]

@@patootie3529 but thats instinct lol. having instinct isnt natural for a lot of things, you just have a feeling because you have 10000+ hours in the game and know that its the right thing to do

[@333razers]

Isn't windows (chrome) limited to the hz of the monitor? I think he could be faster than this.

[@yessirski3854]

yeah i average 230 in the phone app and like 300 on pc and i think i can click faster on pc but still

[@sebastianocrepaldi5927]

chrome is capped at 60 fps so he's definetely able to get more than that

[@emptinessatethewitch]

its recommeded that u subtract 30ms from human benchmark because of delay

[@sebastianocrepaldi5927]

@@emptinessatethewitch thats more for people with slow systems

[@dmitryhoston154]

The test result is affected by the response time of the monitor, as well as the sensitivity of the button on your mouse. when I had a logitech g102 mouse and a 60Hz monitor, my average time was 220. when I bought a logitech g pro mouse and a 144 Hz monitor, my average time was 190. so fuck this test, it doesn't say anything

[@chervilious]

It's even stated in their websites. It's not really a test on your own, it's a test for you and your rig which what you want to check playing competitively

[@Vaczil]

thats why it says average, because time reaction won't be calculated perfectly it depends mostly on mouse

[@goober5795]

It’s good to see how you don’t need crazy fast reaction time to be one of the best players in the world. Well idk about y’all 250 and above people lol

[@rubencaponem4078]

lol ruthless, bro im on like 200/190 my most consistend, is that good or not to good atall? thanks

[@goober5795]

Rubencapone m it’s good but it’s not crazy, 140-150ms average is nuts and anything below that on average is insane. Also remember that the more Hz you have the better the reaction time is going to be on the human benchmark. Because you have more frames to react to so you might not be at your full potential (240hz)

[@kry-9983]

Bro i have a score of like 480 to me his reaction time is nuts lol

[@prathameshbanda2351]

link for reaction time test plz

[@goober5795]

prathamesh banda www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

[@sinis7r]

164 ms, imm1 peak

[@TAP-wi2fm]

Damn he really has some input lag in his browser or his monitor has bad input lag.

[@ezy0161]

so he is human

[@bassboostedmusic740]

-Shroud has left the chat

[@rooost9856]

Im already old at 18 , 400 ms

[@patootie3529]

@Martin Marinov u don't have to hope, u can search the internet how delay will affect ite

[@rooost9856]

@Kr2k ​ @Monke yall were right its actually around 220ms

[@castlers_ismy_idol736]

i got lucky and randomly clicked and i got a 31ms time LOL

[@ashleyjanaso3267]

I literally hit 77 ms but that was the first and the last HAHAH

[@abdc2990]

Sitting at ~185ms personnally, I'm trying a diet and routine to get it below 150 by july 2021

[@szariq7338]

I'll tell this already: It's almost impossible to improve your reaction time, but ofc healthy lifestyle can let you perform a bit better.

[@abdc2990]

@@szariq7338 Well I figure cutting sugar etc might help me a lot, so could consuming coffee sometimes.

[@abdc2990]

@@szariq7338 Well I've been noticing light improvement already. Adjusting diet, sleeping 8 hours instead of 4 and meditating helps.

[@saqenocturne9769]

@@abdc2990 what is ur reaction time now ?

[@abdc2990]

@@saqenocturne9769 Haven't measured in a few weeks, also had some mishaps so the measure wouldn't be viable, will update in a month, I set a reminder.

[@strategistaow3520]

It's disappointed when simple had that slow reaction

[@nuggets517]

Green, greeennnnn whats your problem

[@Yologuy0123]

"168ms" doesn't even realise the fastest in the world is 150

[@kevynjones7792]

goodytv got 140something

[@masterleon40]

The best sprinters actually can go really close to 100

[@سكيس.عربي.طازج]

i swear i just got 166 and 167 lol

[@سكيس.عربي.طازج]

and i just got 163

[@zin9121]

@@سكيس.عربي.طازج if u r consistently getting 167 then youre a god

[@splashaf]

I have an avg 183 on a 144hz monitor

[@Roxy377]

nice me sitting at 245ms wanting to kms

[@puffyin]

I kept getting around 250, but then I tried to focus and got 112. I don't believe I could ever do anything near that consistently though. Edit: Just got 56, although I think it was just "prefiring."

[@Nupator]

Prefire Lol

[@UmCaraNormalnumPlanetanormal]

Holy shit thats fucking insane dude I literally have 329 reaction time, im so fucking below average

[@greenrrr]

And I thought 191ms was bad

[@o.v4069]

@@greenrrr It is I avg 160-170 my fastest

[@greenrrr]

@@o.v4069 i do avg 158 to 190 when im warmed up, what is your display refresh rate?

[@o.v4069]

@@greenrrr I have 75hz monitor.

[@XZagatoX]

Means fuck all, dw bout it lol

[@jasxn7154]

I have about a 170 avg but I’m not simple or a pro so it really doesn’t matter

[@congdao3444]

1:07 where was the guy named AK? in connector?

[@fa1lepp]

0.22 is good?

[@blackpad2842]

0:24 see where he was looking at, he didnt take this seriously. Im sure he is waaaaaaay better than 180.

[@raptor1068]

180 is way above average lmao, its enough to hit dust mid door without wallbanging and flicking

[@urmom-qm9cu]

@Just Some Guy without a Mustache you're actually here

[@ashtonhoffer7692]

I genuinely thought my reaction time for human benchmark was bad, I got avg 186 ms. Im pretty proud of that now.

[@docgonzo9241]

@Just Some Guy without a Mustache It literally said the mean is 215ms ... and you got 186, how is that bad?

[@Mykl0000]

It’s easier if you use a good monitor and mouse that is easy to press. I got 150-160’s even as low as 140’s but on a touchpad I’ll get 200

[@blatantirony5226]

NO, SIMPLE IS NOT SLOW. IN FACT HE IS ABOVE AVERAGE. AND YES 99% OF THE COMMENT SECTION IS EITHER LYING COMPLETELY OR OVER EXAGGERATING. AVERAGE RT IS 230ish MS AND FOR A YOUNG GAMER OR AN ATHLETE IT WOULD BE AROUND 210 MS. S1MPLE MAINS AWP WITH A RT OF 185 MS OR SO AND HE IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE BEST OVERAL PLAYERS IN THE WORLD. "lol he slow my reaction time is 110ms"

[@Pwop.]

i pre fired it before and got 2 ms lmao but avg is 190

[@ooxlan9475]

Ok, I’m surfing with everyone in the comment section just to say that having 180ms doesn’t mean thing when your aim can’t go along with it

[@iqlixx7454]

Me: not human aimbot but I have 160 ms avg

[@calmsh0t]

wow and I thought my reaction time was bad with 150ms ... mijudged by a long shot

[@WilliamTravisIto]

but you're stuck in silver and have no friends lol nobody cares

[@calmsh0t]

@@WilliamTravisIto close call LEM, but still trash

[@osacrpro]

What i dont get is xqc has a reaction of like 170 better then any pro and im still wondering how the what only solution i can come up with is all the gfuel hes snorting.

[@kohii7927]

I got 325 above bragging my slow time haha

[@ljyxbhs]

since everyone is "sharing" their reaction time well i will be like them i hAvE A ReACTioN Of -0990000000002349502943 yep thats correct, i am faster than above zero, im below zero!

[@S0L4RFlare]

Wallhacks in human benchmark? Reported...

[@muzan9865]

It would be like this 0.00000000009 not minus -00000000009

[@DarkKnight15935]

this is not his actual reaction time lol he is clearly clicking slower

[@franzfrand5350]

Casually I avg 160. If I tryhard then it's 140ish - 150ish

[@brendzz3832]

My Average is 175 it’s crazy him and shroud get 150-160

[@jacobjohnson7957]

shit, i didn’t realize pros reaction times weren’t as good as i thought

[@emptinessatethewitch]

that reaction time is still fucked

[@thishandleistaken1011]

He wasn't focused. His reaction time is very good.

[@ShoeAlmighty]

Not really man. Reaction time does not mean time to target stop dick riding.

[@goanga4294]

i get 205 - 215 avg on a 0.10 ms delay phone

[@Prplex.]

Lmao,on my phone it doubles it

[@vitaminnc6443]

Don't worry, it is much harder on phone, you can probably stick a chunk lower, with my setup, I would guess 165, if it is accurate, no cheat, and many tries. I could not get better tahn 172, that was out of 88 clicks, so it is pretty accurate, though you may have been chosen more than me D:

[@am_sf6574]

@@vitaminnc6443 hmm not really I get faster reaction time on phone then on PC lol

[@vitaminnc6443]

@@am_sf6574 M8 It's 'cause you havr bad screen, bad mouse and such.

[@vitaminnc6443]

@@am_sf6574 I get 180 on phone 150 on pc, so yea

[@mayankmathur3257]

high there! mine is around 420ms

[@demapples6580]

Anyone who has a low reaction time average of less than 160 are liars and are just getting lucky on the preclick. It is physically impossible to have that speed due to the speed of electrical signals from your eye to your brain all the way to the muscles in your finger. In order to have a constant average of that speed you must have very small length from brain to finger.

[@colsonwest2358]

I mean it's difficult but not impossible like Kenny's has a reaction time of 158ms

[@colsonwest2358]

@@Dainius274 woosh moment

[@skpapic]

Well what I do to increase my speed is smash my head to the keyboard once I se the color green. Once the signal comes to my brain all I have to do is move my head, not the fingers xd xd

[@colsonwest2358]

@@skpapic Thanks got got 90ms reaction time

[@PlaywiththePlays]

my average is 150-160 ms but goddamn simple has 200 ms avg while he is monster in the game.

[@jeremyreplenish]

avg about 165-180 on 144hz

[@hhhhh-we5ee]

140 ms average, lowest 118

[@WinningEmpire]

my average is 166ms but that's while my tongue is sticked out and I'm 10cm away from the screen xD

[@raphaelj3728]

Ive done 35 ms In preshot

[@degekkemarokkaan]

I am 32 and got reaction time 167. But still the highest level I reached on face-it is lvl 4. So it does not say much I guess.

[@rusty3238]

you're 32 bcs you prefired and hit accidentaly lol

[@degekkemarokkaan]

@@rusty3238 That is called pre-aim noob:P

[@degekkemarokkaan]

@@rusty3238 Yeah I know one guy he became 45 because he prefired and missed. WTF are you talking about?

[@patootie3529]

@@rusty3238 that's his fuckin age...

[@Wtahc]

@@rusty3238 thats his age and your iq

[@vxu3826]

no way you guys are quicker reaction time than s1mple?!?!?!? what?!!?!? are you better than him at csgo too?!?!?!

[@Z3t487]

Human Benchmark Test and in game reaction times are two different things... plus to be pro you don't need to be fast only, lol.

[@vxu3826]

@@Z3t487 i was being sarcastic

[@Ilovemelanins]

They bragging about they time but I’m pretty sure if he did the one where you have to move your mouse to the green dot he would have faster times than all of u

[@damianbajic8971]

Man i like have 300 ms and i try to improve that, is posible to improve reaction time, for boxing aj cs go??

[@Shadower2014]

if u have a 60hz monitor and are gettingg 300ms with it and upgrade to 144hz u should improve 50ms. A guy did a test and he got 246 average in 60hz, changed to 144hz and got 196. So yeah, even the monitor makes a difference. I think if he tested with 240hz he would get maybe 10-30ms faster

[@the_nightwolf3150]

Mines average is 245 220 but once my average was 167

[@BonzZzai]

It‘s totally unimportant if you have 150ms reaction time or 250ms. It won‘t matter as much in the end! Trust me - I know what I‘m talking about...

[@sourstrawberry6636]

If we are comparing between good players, then 1 ms difference is all it takes, not 100

[@gee_]

Damn I thought s1mple would be faster, mine is the same sub 200

[@grsgrtfjygjdrz4349]

he is faster in game more concentration

[@kudosstyle24]

@@grsgrtfjygjdrz4349 cheats can help with this i have a reaction time-150 and some people react in 1ms what is impossible this game is just full of cheats.

[@logsoccer03]

@@kudosstyle24 you think s1mple cheats?

[@moresvance5180]

Reaction time is much much different than hand eye coordination

[@prathameshbanda2351]

link for reaction time test plz

[@solidplay6293]

www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime You are welcome

[@therealb888]

why do u need link u lazy ass?!, watch the video!

[@prathameshbanda2351]

@@therealb888 i aint like u

[@peepzz9127]

lol i got 9 I definitely didn't prefire lmao

[@czesiusalceson]

i accidently do 60 ms

[@parsajamali6495]

I get average 140-160ms does that mean I have better reflexes then s1mple

[@georgepierre3594]

but not as good aim and flick hehe

[@sentinel6950]

no