My father was a serving sailor on HMS Manxman where this film was made, all shot around Malta in 1953. All the crew were dressed as German sailors as the ship was disguised as a German cruiser. Geoffrey Hunter was one of the main stars, our family still has a signed autograph of Geoffrey Hunter addressed to my late father James George.
@peterclague35399 ай бұрын
I’m a Manx Man....we hold her very high in our history, even had a Airfix model of her. Thanks for fathers service. 🇮🇲
@John-ob7dh5 ай бұрын
Very sad end for Hunter.
@stevenpilling53185 ай бұрын
HMS Manxman was one of the remarkable Abdiel class cruisers of the Royal Navy. Capable of a good forty knots, they were intended as fast minelayers. In practice, they performed in an amazing variety of roles due to their outstanding speed and rugged constitution.
@TheRealist20225 ай бұрын
@@stevenpilling5318 Abdiel (or Abdab as we called her) was a welcome sight when we joined her in port. One of the last ships in the RN that had a chokey laundry!
@KJs5813 ай бұрын
@@TheRealist2022As you obviously have experienced the Asian laundry hands, we had a similar system (RAN). We used to pic them up first time on an Asian 6 month deployment, usually in Singas or HK, can't remember, drop them off last time there at end of deployment. We had a lot of trouble when we were up top on Parramatta, we picked them up as usual. We had the tailor in the fwd DC area, the shoemaker ("Wak a Tak") in the mortar metadyne room, and the usual 3 laundry hands. The problem came when we brought them (laundry hands) back to Australia. The reason we did was that the ship relieving us was leaving only about a week after we got back to Sydney. (Could have been Vendetta). They would berth outboard of us, and the three laundry hands would cross deck to Vendetta, never having to actually step ashore. Now, the idea was that they were never ever going to step ashore, so never set foot in Australia, so no immigration problem. But someone leaked it to the press, and they went berzerk, with stories of "visa breaches/international spies" blah blah. Huge furore, but technically no offence committed, as they never left the ship/never stepped ashore. But no ship ever brought them back to Australia again AFAIK. Storm in a teacup.
@paulgumbley48683 жыл бұрын
You can't beat a good old british black and white war film, with you're Sunday roast, and the kip after. Happier days. 🏴🇬🇧
@roybennett63303 жыл бұрын
Too right,my dad was ex subs,rn.. remember him stopping the gardening say 1400 for slap up feed of sardines,or spotted dick for bridge on river Kwai,Mr chips, battle of Britain.. good English fare on both fronts.
@danielguy19633 жыл бұрын
Absolutely 👍🇦🇺
@StickTheGlue3 жыл бұрын
how to confuse an American in 1 sentence :P
@jonny74913 жыл бұрын
I was just about to (corrected, write) right the same.
@gregtaylor61462 жыл бұрын
@@jonny7491 - write
@Bruce-1956 Жыл бұрын
One of the great British 1950s b&w films where most if not all the actors fought in WW2 and knew what war was.
@coleparker3 жыл бұрын
I love these old British War movies. They are accurate in their portrayals
@Bruce-1956 Жыл бұрын
Yes because most of the actors knew war.
@lordeden2732 Жыл бұрын
Because they used advisers who had served in the Royal Navy during the war.
@Bruce-1956 Жыл бұрын
@@lordeden2732and men who had known war.
@jacktattis Жыл бұрын
Yes warts and all.
@peterharvey1762 Жыл бұрын
Also most of the ships used where in WW2 , like HMS Exeter in the Battle river plate
@Laceykat663 жыл бұрын
I am a big movie fan and have never even HEARD of this film before. Thank you for expanding my education.
@tomhanna85084 жыл бұрын
I love the authenticity of the lookout using his eyes and then confirming with binoculars. Too often you see binoculars glued to the observer’s eyes which is exhausting and inefficient.
@benwilson61453 жыл бұрын
Well said, obviously you have kept a lookout at sea.
@KJs5813 жыл бұрын
Part of the drill is a policy broadcast. In the policy broadcast is "lookout routine xxxxxx"; where they insert "standard" or "shadowers". The two routines take into account whether the lookouts will be there for days (not expecting much/less tiring) or "contact expected" (more active). I could rattle off a policy broadcast, but few would be interested, and ship specific; and most wouldn't be interested/raise more questions than it answers (acronyms/abbreviations), but "lookout routine" used to be the last line of a very long policy broadcast.
@just-dl3 жыл бұрын
@@KJs581 I for one would be fascinated, and love to hear about it!
@ВладимирГригорьев-ы5ъ Жыл бұрын
В детстве я не понимал, для чего бинокль, мне было все видно и без него на любом расстоянии
@Barouche3 жыл бұрын
I remember reading Brown On Resolution 50 years ago. It must have been good to stay in my memory all of that time.
@mikebrown19263 жыл бұрын
This is based on "Brown on Resolution" by C. S. Forester, which is an excellent book to read. Also if you have seen the clips from "Greyhound" with Tom Hanks, that film is also based on a C. S. Forester novel, "The Good Shepherd'. In fact, if you like great sea stories, I recommend that you read everything that Forester wrote.
@edl617 Жыл бұрын
I read almost everything written by C.S. Forester. Including The one the movie Greyhound was based on, which I found the movie lacking
@michaelmixon24794 жыл бұрын
I love the older movies! Especially in black and white!
@pieterweatherall28264 жыл бұрын
Surprising what a few years of movie making can do!
@tobytaylor21543 жыл бұрын
Theirs is the glory is a good watch, filmed just after the war on the ground it was fought over, starring the men who were there. Not good acting obviously, but a interesting watch about arnhem.
@overlycreative14 жыл бұрын
I hope the sound editor got a proper award for this great work.
@Sid10358 жыл бұрын
I remember exercising with Indian Navy Ship DELHI in 50's off Ceylon. Dehli was originally HMS Achillies and later HMNZ Achillies (Battle of the River Plate) I was a telegraphist on HMS Newfoundland (Colony class Cruiser) at the time.
@bobmetcalfe96408 жыл бұрын
Hell, my dad was on Newfoundland in WW2. Small world.
@Sid10358 жыл бұрын
Must have been the same commission as me. We brought 'Newfy' out of a major refit in Gus sailed for Trinco to become Flagship East Indies. Happiest ship i ever had.
@Sid10358 жыл бұрын
Sorry i missed the WW2 part, she came out of major refit in 1952.
@bobmetcalfe96408 жыл бұрын
"Happiest ship i ever had."That's what my dad said too. He was at the Japanese surrender. I've got some photos somewhere :).
@philipg528 жыл бұрын
One of my patients was there too.
@beagle7622 Жыл бұрын
I remember watching this in the 80’s on TV . It was a great film, different for the time.
@simul8guy753 жыл бұрын
The ship is supposed too be making 10 knots but is clearly dead in the water as the German shells are finding the range... Gotta love old movies...
@andrewstackpool49113 жыл бұрын
AMESBURY's movements are the major weaknesses of the footage. And noting the CO's comments I think Essen is meant to be a heavy cruiser which outranges Amesbury. Of well, never let the facts get in the way of a good dit, but perhaps they could have looked at Sink The Bismarck for authenticity. Oh and 10 knots? At Action Stations. Not in any war canoe in which I served.
@andywhysall6744 Жыл бұрын
Needs Noel Coward on the bridge. He'd get the steam up.
@tedjinla13 жыл бұрын
This movie was filmed in the Mediterranean using HMS Cleopatra as Amesbury, Cambridge and Stratford, and the fast minelayer HMS Manxman as Essen. They fitted fake turrets and funnels to try and make a convincing German light cruiser out of her. The lagoon where most of the "shooting" took place (yuk yuk) was Gozo the northern-most island of the Maltese archipelago to stand in for Resolution Island in the Galapagos. Thanks for uploading this wonderful sequence. TEDJ in LA
@stevewright24444 жыл бұрын
My dad was serving on the manxman when they used her in this film
@KJs5813 жыл бұрын
Good info mate. These ships were of the time of the AA evolution of these ships. Originally light cruisers were the "sort out raiders/run away if get in trouble" ships, as in the 30's surface ships were the major threat. Cleo had the 5.25 guns here (down from 6 inch previously) which were an interim AA (dual purpose) solution, but as aircraft emerged as the major threat to convoys, (and aircraft got faster) even that was found wanting, as the traverse rate, elevation capability and rate of fire was too limited. Later cruisers had multilple 4.5 and more capable HACS (and early radar). The faster traverse/more rounds carried/higher ROF - AND the VT fuse made for the first (and very capable) true AA cruisers. The Americans did the same with the "Atlanta" class (5 inch guns) and they were capable AA ships; but had to be careful, two were caught in surface battles and outgunned by 6 inch cruisers and sunk. Mountbatten (who the producer knew) liked the internals of guns to be in these movies, and he allowed them to use the ships for movies like this - and the internals of "Vanguard" to be used in "Sink the Bismarck!" where they use Vanguard's 15 inch mounts to portray all loading sequences.
@Bruce-1956 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the information.
@Exciteduser5 ай бұрын
This reminds me of "The Cruel Sea," made about the same time. Excellent film.
@tedjinla13 жыл бұрын
"In the Royal Navy, we never strike an ensign, see?" Best line in the movie...by "M' of James Bond fame.
@halnywiatr4 жыл бұрын
Bernard Lee
@allenjenkins79473 жыл бұрын
Hence "nailing our colours (ensign) to the mast". Sometimes, a large battle ensign would also be unfurled on each side of the hull, just to make it really clear. That was also the symbolism of the giant U.S. flag draped down the side of the Pentagon following the "9-11" attacks - "No surrender!".
@archangel21433 жыл бұрын
Actually, the British struck their flag on September 23rd, 1779 during the American Revolution when John Paul Jones in the USS Bonhomme Richard defeated HMS Serapis off of Flamborough Head; however all is forgiven now! 🇺🇸🇬🇧
@chrismc4103 жыл бұрын
@JZ's Best Friend adapt to situations as they happen and act as logic demands?
@lordeden2732 Жыл бұрын
Three colours One each side and one in the middle
@williamc.11984 жыл бұрын
I served aboard two former Royal Navy ships while attached to the Chilean Navy. British compartmentation is quite a bit different from ours. Far fewer openings for fore and aft passageways.
@eyemstillhear Жыл бұрын
I served on HMS NORFOLK County class destroyer in '79, sold onto the Chilean navy early eighties, who subsequently sank it. 🤣🤣🤣
@nemo6686 Жыл бұрын
To better maintain watertight and smoke integrity in the event of being hit. One of the lessons of the Falklands campaign was that they'd been putting holes in lateral bulkhead to run cables, vents, etc and this allowed smoke to spread and seriously hamper damage control and fighting the ship. It was one of many things that had been forgotten and had to be relearned, and the RN subsequently put a lot more effort into Operational Sea Training to try and minimize this backsliding.
@SvenTviking Жыл бұрын
Learned that off the Germans when we took the High seas fleet.
@Crackdennumber18 жыл бұрын
The 3rd Marine [0:47] is my dad Ron Crabb...
@brentmiller77146 жыл бұрын
God bless him and you
@paulcrober32495 ай бұрын
Very good points about older British war movies. Usually pretty accurate. Having worked with British Army in war zones, I can vouch for this.
@carrickrichards2457 Жыл бұрын
I found this by far the saddest of all Forester's books. The film sought to hide that, even filming two endings (both endings were shown at the premier for the audience to choose).
@lisabrooks80928 жыл бұрын
Jeffrey Hunter is the absolute bomb! One British sailor holding off an entire German cruiser. Of course, that feat was accomplished by the original Captain Kirk!
@deborahparker-mcgee86005 жыл бұрын
Lisa Brooks His name was Captain Pike on the original STAR TREK.
@deborahparker-mcgee86005 жыл бұрын
His character’s name on STAR TREK was Captain Pike.
@sirsydneycamm18835 ай бұрын
There are a few Kirks to choose. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Goodrich_Kirk@@deborahparker-mcgee8600
@Aethelwolf3 жыл бұрын
Great movie. I remember watching this as a kid.
@alexanderwaterman74804 ай бұрын
Me too, and just about every other naval film out there.
@paulmoffat93064 жыл бұрын
Shows the craftsmanship of movie makers in the days before CGI became prevalent. Today's Academy Award for 'Special Effects' should be discarded, as it has become 'Animation' instead, and no longer has relevance.
@DragoonEnNoir6 жыл бұрын
HMS Amesbury is 'played' by the Dido-class light cruiser HMS Cleopatra
@jacktattis Жыл бұрын
The DIDO class had a very busy war 33% were lost.
@joeavent55543 жыл бұрын
"Take your hand out of your pocket"...discipline at all times.
@gregwalsh58803 жыл бұрын
50 black stitches to the inch and every 50th a white stitch. This stopped you pretty quick putting your hands in your pockets. Pockets were for putting items in, not your hands. Discipline never hurt at all.
@joeavent55543 жыл бұрын
@@gregwalsh5880 In just about all military forces throughout the world it is forbidden to keep hands in pockets unless retrieving an object. Notice all the thumbs up? Prior service members get it. The director added this very tiny tidbit not just for nostalgia but to prove a point about attention to detail.
@walterkronkitesleftshoe66843 жыл бұрын
Hands in pockets? "Manchester gloves".
@joeavent55543 жыл бұрын
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Lol
@teecee15673 жыл бұрын
@@gregwalsh5880 What's the deal with the stitches?
@michaelgibson4705 Жыл бұрын
Fortunately Geoffrey Hunter had that old cockney stalwart Victor Maddern helping out,B&W British war films gave him a career a great character actor
@davidmoser35354 ай бұрын
Jeffrey
@Richard5004 жыл бұрын
These older movies are all so much better acted, many of the actors were already War Veterans and knew the drill so to speak. Soldiers looked like soldiers and so did airmen and sailors. These days it makes you cringe when actors THINK they are looking very "military, and they're not. The Dido class cruiser HMS Cleopatra plays both the fictional Royal Navy ships "HMS Amesbury" and "HMS Stratford". Presumably with REAL sailors as extras.
@robsaunders95213 жыл бұрын
And the blanket stackers always tops 👍. Sua Tela Tonanti.
@teresaponziani79835 жыл бұрын
God bless the greatest generation!!!!!
@fixento7 жыл бұрын
You have to love the open bridges when men were men.
@s.sestric99297 жыл бұрын
And sheep were scared.
@hhoward146 жыл бұрын
In steam ships it made sense, because of the extra heat, from the boilers, and the window fogging moisture in an enclosed wheel house, or bridge. Also, the need for 360 deg visual communications.
@rollosnook30316 жыл бұрын
Pleasant on the arctic convoy escort with a 30 knot speed and stormy headwind I'm sure...
@Bisexual_Sovereign4 жыл бұрын
@@rollosnook3031 I mean they had some form of improvised cover but the front was still exposed
@mwnciboo4 жыл бұрын
@@hhoward14 What? Thats not the reason at all, we didn't use piped steam like some kind of pseudo air conditioner through the ship, causing condensation or otherwise.
@kevinolsen87795 ай бұрын
"Action stations, please." gotta love the Royal Navy
@mitchellminer9597Ай бұрын
Excellent shot at 1:08 of the breech of a gun. The breech plug is a three-part interrupted screw, and the obdurator ring is in front of that. The interrupted screw design is derived from a screw-in breech block, but half the threads are machined away, lengthwise, on each part. In use, the breech plug is aligned so it can slide in, and then given a half turn to engage the threads and snug it tight. It is fast and strong. This breech is made with a three-part interrupted screw to get more thread area engaged. On the front of the breech plug is the obdurator plug. It pushes against the back of the propellant casing. When the gun is fired, the plug is pushed back, and the grey rubber ring squishes out to seal the breech against gas flow.
@photodom20004 жыл бұрын
Spotted Jeffrey straight away. What was a Yank doing in the Royal Navy? Or was he Canadian? I used to love watching these films on a Sunday afternoon when I were a lad.
@1chish4 жыл бұрын
He played the role of "Signalman Andrew 'Canada' Brown"
@Fjobiden4 жыл бұрын
Those movies are still better than anything they can come up with today
@rb11794 жыл бұрын
What was HITLER'S nephew doing in the US Navy during WW2?
@HootOwl5134 жыл бұрын
@@rb1179 He was a Corpsman.
@photodom20004 жыл бұрын
@@rb1179 You'll need to explain that one?
@jackjacko87062 жыл бұрын
This looks more like a training film compared to “The Cruel Sea” a far superior film
@NJPurling3 жыл бұрын
The only thing the guns of the 'Essen' could not penetrate were the stiff upper lips of the officers.
@ichabodon4 жыл бұрын
Sorry James, that is not Compo from Last of the Summer Wine. It’s the great late Victor Madden
@teecee15673 жыл бұрын
Maddern...as opposed to Madden
@enochpowelghost12 жыл бұрын
yes thanks for uploading such a good film clip well done
@raymaxwell29403 жыл бұрын
victor maddern was in some iconic war movies served in the RN in ww2 joining at 14 these movies take me back to the 70s as a kid watching with my grandfather who was a RM in ww2 narvik dunkirk Russian convoys crete malta dieppe burma etc etc
@Phaaschh4 жыл бұрын
"I've got a strange feeling things are about to get a bit dodgy" So would I, sitting there, beam on, engines dead slow and hopelessly outranged. And then get bracketed by their first salvo. Ze Chermans must have been hooting with laughter.
@nandotempo16704 жыл бұрын
Yy
@11Kralle3 жыл бұрын
We only laugh when ordered to do so ;)
@sirsydneycamm18835 ай бұрын
The German sense of humour is no laughing matter. Spike Milligan
@ElkeVixen2 жыл бұрын
"Take that hand out of that pocket there you" its little details like that that help add to the realism of the film
@RobertClolery5 ай бұрын
One of my father's favorite movies.
@tag4277 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting!
@RobertClolery5 ай бұрын
Those German range finders will get you every time
@m4ch2074 жыл бұрын
That movie's quality is mich better than today's cctv
@ieatoutoften872 Жыл бұрын
This scene features a Dido class destroyer (small ship, with relatively short range gns) attacking a German heavy cruiser (a medium sized ship, with longer range gns). About three times, various British sailors mention [His Majesty's Ship] Cambridge (fictitious as to being a W.W.2 era heavy cruiser), and an even match for the German ship), hoping it would join this battle. This fictitious (imagined) scene on fictional destroyer H.M.S. Amesbury has several parallels (honorary references) to The Battle of the River Plate [or rather the estuary of said river; or more so the southwest Atlantic Ocean] (December 1939). The outcome of that December 1939 battle was probably on the front page of every newspaper in the U.K., and New Zealand, and many other places by the time the month of January 1940 passed. There were newsreel films shown at movie theaters of those three ships' triumphant return to respective home ports. And the respective crews were filmed marching in parade formation in front of ecstatic, welcoming civilians. The ships in the December 1939 battle were heavy cruiser H.M.S. Exeter, destroyer H.M.S. Achilles (home port New Zealand), destroyer H.M.S. Ajax, and the German "pocket battleship" (super heavy cruiser) Admiral Graf Spee. In that battle, enemy shrapnel cut a rope holding H.M.S. Achilles' battle ensign (flag). Great grandparents in New Zealand are still talking about the news story about how a replacement flag was raised in the midst of the battle. It was like the U.S.A.'s national anthem: "Oh say can you see that our flag was still there?" That emotional moment is also referenced in this short video when the master chief is showing and teaching the enlisted men why a rolled up flag is made ready, and why there are two extra ropes ready to hoist it up.
@ericadams3428 Жыл бұрын
The Dido class light cruiser HMS Cleopatra (10 x 5.25" played both Amesbury and Stratford. HMS Glasgow was also in the film and the Essen was played by the minelayer HMS Manxman.
@gerarddelmonte8776 Жыл бұрын
Ajax and Achilles were light cruisers, not destroyers.
@ieatoutoften872 Жыл бұрын
@@gerarddelmonte8776 I sincerely thank you for correcting my mistakes because my ambition is to be accurate, and I realize you are correct.
@Tourist1967 Жыл бұрын
@@ieatoutoften872 New Zealand ships are styled HMNZS.
@ieatoutoften872 Жыл бұрын
@@Tourist1967 There was some tricky history regarding the New Zealand Navy. In 1939, the New Zealand Navy was a subset of the Royal Navy. From 1921 to 1 October 1941 the force was known as the New Zealand Division of the Royal Navy. On 1 October 1941, the New Zealand Navy was established independent of the Royal Navy. And then, also on 1 October 1941, HMS Achilles was commissioned (recommissioned / styled) HMNZ Achilles. In 1948, it was sold to India.
@davidsirett55604 жыл бұрын
Jeffrey Hunter Captain Christopher Pike of the space ship Enterprise from the stellar group at the other end of this galaxy.
@randyjohnson68454 жыл бұрын
You knew that right .Hunter was his son from the brief encounter with the British lady
@ivorholtskog55063 жыл бұрын
I think he also played in corvette K225.
@Bellthorian2 жыл бұрын
I remember being a signalman striker in the USN in 1988, clapping the shutters on the signal lights was considered very bad form.
@Weesel714 жыл бұрын
Great flick. Well worth watching.
@matthewgray4694 жыл бұрын
I first saw it over 50 years ago and I still remember it vividly -a courageous sailor with a rifle pinning down the nazi sailors
@JohnSmith-zv8km6 жыл бұрын
would have been believable if the ship was actually moving
@johngreen3543 Жыл бұрын
The opening comment mentions that this was the 2d adaptation of Brown On Resolution. The first was "Forever England" starring John Mills. It is available on youtube.
@S25038513 жыл бұрын
@Marafox2 You can order the DVD from Amazon.com or Ebay (probably from other sites too, that I'm not aware of). The only problem is that it is a region 1 DVD and since you live in a region 2 area you need a region-free DVD player to watch it. Good luck!
@gerry3433 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/q3OTd2iHhNqljtE
@fairportfan23 жыл бұрын
Or a copy of DVDFab
@grindupBaker4 жыл бұрын
If he could get GORT to assist they'd vaporize that other ship.
@teecee15673 жыл бұрын
I was wracking my brains to think what the acronym GORT meant. I'd been a navy man for 25 years and know that the RN uses acronyms for everything... ECR for engine control room, DC for damage control, NCS for naval control of shipping, STANAVFORLANT for standing naval force atlantic... etc etc... but was so annoyed to realise I never knew what it meant. then I bloody realised it wasn't an acronym at all..GORT is the name of the alien played by the Captain in this piece, Michael Rennie. DOHHH!!!!!
@pracylopgonzer31763 жыл бұрын
Gory couldn’t swim
@alanmusicman33853 жыл бұрын
Never heard of or seen this film. With the DVD versions of it selling for what they do on Amazon, I probably never will either!
@randyjohnson68454 жыл бұрын
At this range you couldn't hit a British cruiser. 32.5 knots zigzagging, straight line and making smoke.not a chance if the cruiser was trying to survive
@davidrussell8689 Жыл бұрын
Understanding that this is only fiction but one can only wonder if the calm , collected attitude in combat actually existed ? If those officers and men were so then they are more than heroes.
@nightjarflying Жыл бұрын
Training & experience - it's exactly how most professional soldiers/sailors/aircrew act under fire
@SSN51511 ай бұрын
Been there. Done that. It's correct. At that point all you have is training and coolness, even if you are terrified. If you freak, you die.
@bigbob16996 жыл бұрын
Those German range finders will get you every time!
@johnminehan11486 жыл бұрын
Solid bracket, 2 overs and 2 shorts, drop 50 fire for effect.
@Supergeologist4 жыл бұрын
After the Graf Spee action the brits set up a fake scrap company in Uruguay and bought the salvage rights to the Graf Spee mainly so they could get the range finder tech. I maybe wrong but I've got a feeling it was designed by a Brit many years previously but the Navy fobbed him off so he sold it to the Germans.
@bigbob16994 жыл бұрын
The results were the same .@@Supergeologist
@jacktattis Жыл бұрын
well the Warspite 1915.16 did ok hit a moving ship at 26000 yards as did the Scharnhorst 1937 ship
@flagwanker63464 жыл бұрын
10” lamp being answered by 20” carbon arc lamp. 20” carbon arc lamp carbon rods were a bitch to change!
@KJs5813 жыл бұрын
Yeah, ours only ever had the 10". The older RN based ships had them; saw some on some of the older Kiwi ships.
@KJs5813 ай бұрын
What a great clip. The OIC of DC party " 'ands outa yer pockets!!!!" Love it. :-) All that stuff from the squealing sound powered phone and the rubber encased main broadcast microphone to the various ships fittings is very familiar to anyone who served in any of the post war type 12's/Darings etc, as it was standard fit for RN designs (and RN devised designs in my case) and while cruisers disappeared earlier, many RN based destroyer size ships endured for many years. Great to see.
@zorro4563 жыл бұрын
A Movie I did not know Before.
@rosewhite--- Жыл бұрын
It would be wonderful if some of those big guns were in a museum and we could open and load with blanks!
@LawrencePuchala-z4n4 ай бұрын
I read a lot of the comments about the Dido cruiser. Not wanting to brag but I recognized the first time we had a broadside view. The Didos were not much as cruisers but they were tough little ships crewed by tough men. Any doubt look up one of the battles of Sirte in the Med. A squadron of Didos and a few DDs against an Italian task force.
@garfieldsmith3323 жыл бұрын
Great little movie. Available on DVD. Two different endings were filmed for the American release.
@agwhitaker6 жыл бұрын
Open bridge or whatever - those Dido class cruisers were hansom ships.
@torinbrown81964 жыл бұрын
Yes, except ships are "she" not "he." She's beautiful not handsome.
@jonathanstrong48122 жыл бұрын
the Dido light anti-aircraft-cruiser HMS Cleopatra a veteran warship which who fought in WW2 against the Italian-Navy to force a desperate Malta-convoy to relieved Malta in March 1942 And the Cleopatra was the flagship of the desperate situation And the Cleopatra play in the A Sailor Of The King in a double roll one was the doomed HMS Amesbury and also the victorious HMS Stratford
@williamkennedy54924 жыл бұрын
The Brits as they once were, now we try to forget our heritage culture and history.
@MIMALECKIPL4 жыл бұрын
Peace brings laziness in people, and too much of welfare softens people up and makes them bored. And bored people start inventing stupid things and we get political correctness and "white man's guilt" in action.
@stevek88294 жыл бұрын
As an American, even I would bet my last dime that any of Her Majesty's warships would currently conduct herself just as well.
@MIMALECKIPL4 жыл бұрын
@@stevek8829 America is just behind UK with general degeneration of society. See current riots and BLM along with Antifa.
@welshpete124 жыл бұрын
@@stevek8829 I was going to say the same !
@welshpete124 жыл бұрын
@@MIMALECKIPL what a wally !
@danieldravot3414 ай бұрын
I knew M, from His Majesty’s Secret Service, had been a naval man but I would’ve thought he’d have been an officer by this time . . .
@Alex_Guy1011 Жыл бұрын
A battle just about as destructive as the HMAS Sydney vs Kormoran.
@billyponsonby Жыл бұрын
Authentic because it was soon after the war. Also, fighting from an open bridge must have required a particular type of toughness.
@S25038512 жыл бұрын
I have uploaded another excerpt as "Clip from "Single-Handed"/"Sailor of the King" (1953)", but as you understand, the entire movie is copyrighted. Fortunately, the DVD is available in 'Amazon' and it contains both ends.
@christinewainwright11788 жыл бұрын
S250385 1
@stevefisher83233 жыл бұрын
Michael Rennie in his uniform, very dashing indeed!
@statewidefilms4 жыл бұрын
Ha har .... the guy on the right at 3.09 was my uncle Victor Maddern . He lives on in movies ..
@pungarehu4 жыл бұрын
He was a fantastic actor. What was he like as your uncle?
@statewidefilms4 жыл бұрын
@@pungarehu would you believe I never met him .. but my father spoke of him all the time .. we came to Australia and they all lived in England ..
@S25038511 жыл бұрын
No, the movie was definitely B&W (I have it on DVD), but there are many colour posters of it.
@Auge20117 жыл бұрын
rarely i seen in any war movie ships using torpedoes launchers
@TorontoJediMaster4 жыл бұрын
Are the wearing berets, who are seen 0:46 going into a gun turret Royal Marines?
@andrewstackpool49113 жыл бұрын
Yes, Marines were part of the gun crews
@roybennett63303 жыл бұрын
@@andrewstackpool4911 I'm told generally X turret.mmm and to keep the silly sailors on their toes...bootneck, bootneck
@andrewstackpool49113 жыл бұрын
@@roybennett6330 Nah, to keep em busy lest they get into mischief. Incidentally, the Bofors used before Essen used her main armament (overkill?) was a 40/60, a radar-controlled version that was not built at the time of the story.
@KJs5813 жыл бұрын
@@andrewstackpool4911 Probably a STAAG mount. Hardest radar EVER to maintain. Couldn't handle the vibration/weather; most of ours were removed and reverted to standard bofors. Essentially CIWS idea before it's time.
@KJs5813 жыл бұрын
During action, it is not unusual for every branch/type of crew to man "lower quarters." Needed a lot of hands to get rounds from Mag/shellroom up to gunbay, and thence to breech/loaded on the older mounts. (16 sailors in each 4.5 mount on a Daring/DE). On these ships; marines not needed for their normal job during main armament engagement, so............................ On a current Anzac class FFH (for example) they cruised (defence) with 19 rounds in the drum, and could fire with the gunbay unmanned (we have one guy in there in case of problems, Kiwi's didn't). But go to action, have to man the mags (mixed mags) so that can get shells from mag racks, up hoist into drum as the FCO fires them. So they have a weapons sailor in each one as the expert (identify ammo/ensure proper handling), and "anyone else" (usually cooks) as the "spare hand." Makes sense. Unless "action messing" cooks won't be cooking much at action.
@cttc41327 жыл бұрын
Those must be special homing torpedoes. They fired them where their opponent is, as opposed to where the opponent is headed.
@sirderam16 жыл бұрын
Ct Tc. I dont know how this torpedo system worked, but perhaps the sights were offset, by a calculated deflection angle, with respect to the tubes. If not you'd be sighting on empty ocean, which would be a bit pointless since you'd have no aiming mark.
@flybobbie14494 жыл бұрын
I had a customer who was in the navy, he said they would practise shooting guns at a sea target with offset, not to destroy target. But he said they often knew the offset and deliberately fired to hit the target. Reckoned he was one of the last to use cordite firing guns. A miss fire was an exciting time in the turret if you were nominated to unload the gun.
@barthoving20533 жыл бұрын
@@sirderam1 That's generally how sights work. Even rifle sights you adjust to range and at longer ranges wind.
@sirderam13 жыл бұрын
@@barthoving2053 Yes, thanks. I've a fair idea how sights work, I shot full bore target rifle for many years in my younger days. 😂😜
@KJs5813 жыл бұрын
@@flybobbie1449 Yeah, misfires still suck. Worse with a "hot gun" if a HE round.
@RaymondFunnell-bs1wl6 ай бұрын
With that great actor Victor Maddern
@ffrederickskitty2143 жыл бұрын
I think the ship might have fared better if it was actually moving?
@georgebuller19149 жыл бұрын
3-12. 'I say, let's stop engines altogether and just sit here waiting for it!' LOL
@j3lny4254 жыл бұрын
So you noticed that as well. If you noticed the torpedo aiming the German ship was not moving either.
@edwardramirez87682 жыл бұрын
" Damn the Torpedoes, full steam ahead"!
@davidevans-eg1ut7 жыл бұрын
The original story was called Brown on Resolution and was written by C.S. Forrester. The book differed from the film.
@gerry3433 жыл бұрын
The book is set in World War 1.
@johngreen3543 Жыл бұрын
Only on minor points. But in the main Brown does prevent Essen from getting repaired quickly. That is the essence of the story and that is preserved in the movie.
@eeagleeric8 жыл бұрын
open bridges! they were tougher then...
@jonsouth15457 жыл бұрын
still use them today all warships have both an enclosed and an open bridge and its the personal preference of the CO which one to use when I was in (only left a few years ago) we always used the open bridge as although it was bloody freezing you got a better view and was generally less cramped
@KJs5813 жыл бұрын
The open bridges (on MFU's in any case) they have now are more of a flying bridge and not much up there, (if at all) all our ships have enclosed bridges. The skippers routinely use the bridge wings if they want to "get out in the breeze; hence why a "CO's Chair" both inside and out. Any flying bridge we have now has nowhere near the access old open bridges did - at least in my Navy (RAN); However; (as said below by Jon S) smaller ships (patrol boats/minehunter etc) often have everything duplicated; so in that sense, they DO have an "open bridge". They don't have the complex "ops room" larger fleet units have; so the open bridge is a good alternative for awareness. But is different now than above. CO's on Frigate size and above NEVER "fight the war" from the bridge now, they fight it from the ops room, along with the PWO (warfare officer) The bridge during action is run by the Officer of the watch, and he virtually "just checks ship is clear of stuff" - the full picture (radar/combat awareness) is in Ops. The open bridges of the past were "open" and EVERYTHING the CO needed could be accessed from there; but they had a "sheltered section" which was like a "shelf" that ran around the outside of the bridge. Under there was usually a chart table, a radar display, clearview screens, and (on really old ships) a side room for primitive sonar, before sonar grew and got it's own control room. By the time I came along, our Darings had enclosed bridges (got updated). But we went over to Duchess (older Daring we were loaned after losing Voyager) and had a look at her open bridge. They had an old JUA valve radar display. While under cover; that would be a nightmare to maintain with the spray and humidity. JUA's where horrible to maintain in an Airconned Ops room!!!!!!!
@mhennessy51344 ай бұрын
More times than I can remember
@JohnSmith-zf1lq7 жыл бұрын
What's the vest the damage control men are wearing over their coveralls? Life preserver? Respirator? Storage?
@232nightowl4 жыл бұрын
Floatation devices in case they go overboard
@vernedavis58562 жыл бұрын
Torpedos had very short range. Largest guns, such as ones that were beyond range of opponents, were several miles, close to past range of site
@freddieclark Жыл бұрын
Totally depends on which torpedo's you are talking about. The Japanese type 93 had a massive range of over 40,000 yards (although the effective range was only around 24,000 yards), far longer than allied light Cruiser guns could effectively engage. The British 21 inch Mark IX had a range of around 15,000 yards.
@paulmaxwell885111 ай бұрын
Wrong. The standard U..S Navy Mark 15 had a range of 15,000 yards or 7.4 nautical miles. The Japanese Long Lance had a range of 44,000 yards or an unbelievable 22 nautical miles.
@S25038511 жыл бұрын
Are you referring to "The Cruel Sea"? (just a guess - I haven't watched that film, though after seeing the trailer I'll definitely try to find it). I totally agree with your comment about the spirit of 'those days'.
@Weesel714 жыл бұрын
Also look up The Key. I believe this is based on Jan de Hartog's The Captain. Read book; watch movie; enjoy both. HAGO.
@ariadnekorais90314 жыл бұрын
@@Weesel71 Thank you!
@noelnicholls18944 жыл бұрын
Cruel Sea was on the North Atlantic run to Russia. This looks to be the Med
@stevek88294 жыл бұрын
"The Cruel Sea" is a hell of a book. The movie is hard to find.
@noelnicholls18944 жыл бұрын
Steve K - Helluva book for sure. No wonder Fleming gave Bond that Arctic Convoy as part of his background story. Tougher than I could stand.
@TheRealist20225 ай бұрын
FUN FACT. Jeffrey Hunter (the sailor who took the message) Became a Captain! (of USS Enterprise!)
@Marafox213 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the upload! Where did you get the pictures from? Is there a DVD buyable? I would like to get the hole film, because I love the book of C.S. Forester really a lot. Thanks for a repy.
@gerry3433 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/q3OTd2iHhNqljtE
@АлександрКулагин-э1ф4 жыл бұрын
Корабли 20-40-х годов самые красивые.
@markquinn34783 жыл бұрын
One of my dads work mates served on Manxman and told him she was good for 40 knots but couldn’t sustain it cos she’d shake herself to bits
@johnwalsh72564 ай бұрын
Those were the days!
@adrianjackson26966 жыл бұрын
Capt is Peter Finch a fine AussIe actor of the era
@adrianjackson26966 жыл бұрын
OOPS, Yes and I have seen "The Day The Earth Stood Still" too. I must have been watching, before writing this comment about Peter Finch, the WW2 film about the German ship scuttled by its captain off South America who was played by Peter Finch.
@johngreen3543 Жыл бұрын
He played Captain Landsdorf in the Battle of the River Platte.
@clinging54321 Жыл бұрын
Peter Finch was English, born in South Kensington, London. - he did play an Aussie in A Town like Alice, may have caused confusion..
@adrianjackson2696 Жыл бұрын
@@clinging54321- Finch immigrated to Australia from UK as a teenager and was raised in Sydney. After WW2 service in Australia he moved overseas permanently according to Wikipedia.
@clinging54321 Жыл бұрын
@@adrianjackson2696 so he was English then? He died in the US does that make him American?
@brianwinters54344 жыл бұрын
Great movie
@hippyscollectables10 жыл бұрын
Is that Jeffrey Hunter, as the sailor taking the message, in the begining?
@S25038510 жыл бұрын
That's right, and he re-appears later in the clip. Actually, he's the protagonist of the film.
@ussnewjerseybb628 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@TheHongKongHermit6 жыл бұрын
Ah, that explains why he gives an American salute, not a British one.
@johngreen3543 Жыл бұрын
@@TheHongKongHermit He did indeed give an American salute. That I noticed when I watched the movie years ago.
@stevek88294 жыл бұрын
The Day the Earth Stood Still
@marvinwatkins88897 жыл бұрын
Oy? What's that Yank Brown doin' 'ere ( or is e a Canuck? Eh, what?) ? BTW: those flashes would appear much before the "booms."
@johnbower74524 жыл бұрын
I would have thought the 'booms' would get to you at the same time as the shells. Surely they travel as fast as sound due to the distance they have to travel.
@robwilde8554 жыл бұрын
@@johnbower7452 Your point is interesting. At about two and a half thousand feet per second, big naval shells in WW2 travelled at more than twice the speed of sound. First the flash - almost instantaneous to the moment of firing - then the shell's arrival and explosion; and only after that, the sound. If you've been hit, you never hear the gun that's killed you.
@robwilde8554 жыл бұрын
And shells from the largest guns would take over a minute to travel along the high arc needed at maximum range of well over twenty miles. Impressive - and frightening - stuff.
@MichaelWilliams-mo1vv4 жыл бұрын
Was that Michael Rennie from 'The day the earth stood still?'
@Weesel714 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@ralebeau8 жыл бұрын
The 68 minute 1935 version is here kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZfEnoOArqmjhsk It was titled "Forever England", "Born for Glory" and "Brown on Resolution." I don't know which was the original title.
@raspano14 жыл бұрын
Why is the Brit boat dead in the water???
@woods4574 жыл бұрын
I suppose they wanted the ship in shot when the bag charges in the water exploded..
@alohathaxted4 жыл бұрын
Its tea time.
@willbest154710 жыл бұрын
Good one, have not seen it.
@mwbright Жыл бұрын
If not for the courage of the fearless crew, the Amesbury would be lost.
@tazmod72724 жыл бұрын
I saw the whole movie. It was a gooder.
@simonjackson72694 жыл бұрын
Correct Royal Navy salutes!!! And why are some Officers and Ratings not wearing flash masks?