Safety, Blue Origin’s Top Mission

Blue Origin has been flight testing the New Shepard rocket and its redundant safety systems since 2012. The program has completed 15 consecutive successful missions, including three successful tests of the crew escape system, showing it can activate safely in any phase of flight.
To view an updated version of this video, please visit: • Safety, Blue Origin’s ...

[@dBager]

0:04 - 'an agressive' XD

[@tubepkn]

And that's where I stopped watching it ...

[@KvetaURL]

@@tubepkn same here, strait to the comments

[@alexberry4758]

Hahah

[@padsundar]

Liked safety aspect. We need module design like this to escape from rocket booster blast like fighter pilot seat ejector during crash..

[@dislike__button]

Blue Origin needs to ramp up their pace considerably. The last thing we want is a monopoly of one company in space, even if it's SpaceX. Competition is the key to progress.

[@graullas8981]

There are way better companies than Blue Origin to compete with SpaceX. Actually thinking that there is only SpaceX and Blue Origin is really ignorant. I will say the main competitor to SpaceX is Rocket Lab now, because they steal much of the cubesat industry from SpaceX.

[@clancy5600]

@@graullas8981 Rocketlab for cubesats (although they are tailored towards different types of customers), ULA for military contracts, Ariane 5 for GEO communication satellites. The launch industry is much larger than just 1 company.

[@graullas8981]

@@clancy5600 Yep, and there are tens being created everyday. Gotta love new space!

[@DC2022]

@@clancy5600 Arianespace. Ariane 5 is one of the rockets the company is proposing ; )

[@Cyber-kc2oh]

@@clancy5600 What about Northrop Grumman? Their Antares rocket and Cygnus spacecraft is very useful for resupplying the ISS. Perhaps Antares will get replaced by a more reusable rocket in the future, but Cygnus will continue to be important for people living on the ISS or perhaps future space stations.

[@WasatchWind]

I think the work blue origin is doing is great - but I'm really surprised they still haven't done a crewed test flight yet.

[@clancy5600]

This should be the last uncrewed test flight before the crewed one.

[@dbreardon]

The decision to sent people to space is not up to Blue, I don't believe. They are required to get FAA and other approvals in order to send crew to space from US soil. I am sort of happy private companies need government approval. If not, I can see a lot of companies doing things on the slide just to reap profits and send people up before they are ready. This at least puts everyone on a level playing field.....but does hurt smaller, less profitable companies to get in the game as they do not have long term reserves of cash to conduct all the necessary testing and procedures before final approval. Just look at Dream Chaser as well as others who jumped into the game and finally gave up.

[@stump182]

Which is what happens when "Safety" is your Top Mission

[@NorthernChev]

Yeah, fifteen years of producing nothing has a tendency to surprise us all...

[@dbreardon]

@@NorthernChev Are you talking about Boeing/northrupt starliner, orion and SLS?

[@brendanhenderson6999]

Nothing safer than doing nothing.

[@alexberry4758]

Hahahahah. This is an under rated comment

[@TheMrPeteChannel]

Meanwhile another company just blows up rocket after rocket and claims PROGRESS!

[@alexberry4758]

@@TheMrPeteChannel I’ll be back next week after sn15 lands to see whether your opinion has changed. :)

[@porchmonkey5774]

@@TheMrPeteChannel Yeah, welcome to trial and error. Are you new?

[@TheMrPeteChannel]

@@alexberry4758 That depends on "how" it lands!🙃

[@user_of_the_force_15.74]

0:35 Above or below the Karmen Line?

[@brandonfleming7118]

Looking forward to a crewed launch!

[@Vatsyayana87]

Indeed, i do wish they came up with a new term though, Astronaut should keeps its special meaning, these customers are not nauting anything lol they are just visiting for a couple minutes. Hardly astro-guests. Would be fun to go on the ride, but i sure would not call myself an astronaut afterword lol

[@brandonfleming7118]

@@Vatsyayana87 Space Tourists.

[@clancy5600]

@@Vatsyayana87 Astronaut has always been anyone who reaches an altitude over 100km. For all intents and purposes, they are astronauts. Although of course this isn't the same as an orbital flight, they are astronauts anyways.

[@Vatsyayana87]

@@brandonfleming7118 Indeed, they should keep it at that, but still.. For a few minutes.. I still think visitor barely even qualifies lol But ill go with tourist because it means person of no interest, just stopping by lol Astronaut has always been a highly honorable title.

[@Vatsyayana87]

@@clancy5600 But astronaut means space explorer, so for intents and purpose i cant agree. None the less, that term was designated as such when just doing that was a feat, at some point, like now, using it for joe and jenny on a Saturday feels like it makes the term meaningless. Im not starting a petition against it, im just saying i like that real astronauts can hold their head high with the title they earned.

[@TaurusSpace]

Blue origin is getting better and better everyday

[@slaphappyduplenty2436]

Well, not every *day*. Maybe every year. Every two-three years.

[@sgauntt]

I will say, this seems like a very well tested system and pretty safe.

[@TheMrPeteChannel]

Yes. BO has only lost 1 prototype test rocket smaller than New Sheppard & the first New Sheppard booster.

[@amberl.brewer8538]

3 days until you experience your childhood dream! May your flight be safe! A true pioneer of one's dreams and that they can come true! God Bless!

[@MACADEMIAC]

Absolute winner.

[@sumitgpatil]

This is nuts, blue origin is beauty...😍❤️

[@AndreyDrozder]

Well done 👍

[@I_Am_AI_007]

Go Blue Origin... We support you!

[@MitoKSP]

I appreciate every rocket company! keep it up!

[@jeanstewart9484]

Me too! The more the better!! Like the space race, the companies keep pushing each other to go forward!! Blue orgin's new armstrong was announced after spacex announced starship! Keep pushing forward!

[@MitoKSP]

@@jeanstewart9484 Excactly

[@ChevTecGroup]

New Glenn Wen?

[@dbreardon]

Probably in late 2022 or more likely in 2023 I suspect. I'll be interested to see how New Glenn lands on their ship when they have 3-6 foot waves moving the ship up and down. That thing is going to be a behemoth.

[@dbreardon]

@@brendanariki Yes, but they still rock back and forth

[@adamrezabek9469]

@@brendanariki not only bigger, but also moving. That makes it even more stable

[@markallan9528]

Congratulations Blue Origin team on a successful flight! Appreciate the studied testing, the phases of testing going on. Grateful to learn more about your facilities! Exciting work, thank you so much!

[@chun-weikong7086]

Can’t wait to see the first crewed mission coming soon in 2021! Go Blue Origin!

[@seppothedestroyer731]

Virgin suborbital New Shepard VS. Chad interplanetary Starship

[@aloiye5470]

@ok ok starship is much harder to land then New Sheppard

[@lamquangnguyen2758]

@ok ok This didn't age well

[@cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647]

Virgin should team up as well and Mr. Dyson should join the team now that Nasa has the perfect sap to blame if all goes wrong now

[@glenn5278]

@ok ok What a Blue Oilrig Fanboy you are. Bezos got over 4X the money Elon did for the HLS, and still lost. The protest won't change anything except maybe (a) get politicians crying for more money for Artemis, that will (b) go toward Bezos and Dynetics. NS is nothing but marketing and space tourism. Screw Starship, look at F9 and FH since Bezos started the NS program. There's a huge difference between orbital and "let's just dip over the Karman Line." I'm all for competition, and I'm definitely on Team Space - but you dissing Starship for exploding is weak. Learn the difference between an iterative process where failure is always an option, vs. NASA, Bezos, Boeing, NG, etc. Compare the development timelines AND the safety records of F9 and Starship v. SLS, Artemis, Blue Oreos, and Starliner. You can be happy about what another group does without slagging someone else. And slagging SpaceX just shows how ignorant you are.

[@danielbae458]

@@glenn5278 Failure is always an option for the latter companies you mentioned when they're testing their vehicles... What the fuck are you on about? Also Shepard was built for a completely different purpose than SpaceX. Shepard was meant to provide space travel at a much more affordable price (for rich ppl ofc) and SpaceX is focused on putting the next man/woman on the moon and delivering payloads/people to the ISS.

[@Bia2fix]

GREAT

[@SpaceflightRocketShorts]

Can’t even get orbital :KEKW:

[@adamrezabek9469]

you niether

[@SpaceflightRocketShorts]

@@adamrezabek9469 what?

[@adamrezabek9469]

@@SpaceflightRocketShorts not getting orbital doesn't mean you are bad. Most companies can't go orbital

[@letsmakegadgets6899]

@@adamrezabek9469 That literally just insinuating that you agree that Blue Origin is no different than all the other space startups.

[@waterrocketlab151]

4:37 the escape system literally is solid (powered by a solid rocket booster)

[@adamrezabek9469]

@Eduard van Sligtenhorst they are not so great for regular rocket use (expansive fuel and almost no control), but they are good choice for abort system

[@adamrezabek9469]

@Eduard van Sligtenhorst first stages are easiest to reuse, so you want liquid fuel becouse reusing SRB is kinda pointless. And upper stages must be precise. But abort system is perfect fit

[@adamrezabek9469]

@Eduard van Sligtenhorst yes, but like common, building fully expandable rockets in 2020s? But yes, if you (for whatever reason) want to (e.g. congress forces you to low development cost), SRB are OK as long as you can abort when they run (not like STS)

[@adamrezabek9469]

@Eduard van Sligtenhorst i don't think everyone should aim for reusability. With super small rockets (astra/virgin orbit), it doesn't make much sense.

[@headcrab4090]

Same as on most fighter jets. Proven technology.

[@scoringdigitsson.5194]

Please make crewed flight asap. I want to see it. :)

[@Polysanityy]

sTeP bY sTeP (very slowly)

[@falafeldurum2095]

same applies for NASA, and even SpaceX almost never hold their timelines.. just sayin

[@sciarkadatul411]

@@falafeldurum2095 but for 20 years? Their goal isn't even fully reaching space yet at least for now for the new shepherd. Aren't this rocket a little too outdated.

[@sciarkadatul411]

@@falafeldurum2095 how come they can launch a crew mission without a clear flight data, They didn't even have a payload test that safety land or successful launch to space. How come they are ready for crew missions?

[@falafeldurum2095]

@@sciarkadatul411 gotta do some research before spreading false facts _"for 20 years"_ New Glenn development began in 2012, the same year when SpaceX's Starship development started. _"Their goal isn't even fully reaching space yet at least for now"_ Sure it (barely) reaches space, New Shepard reaches ~105km on a suborbital trajectory and they want to reach orbit (if you mean that by "fully") using New Glenn. New Shepard is different and they never intended to use it like a Falcon 9. You can't judge a rocket by goals it was never supposed to reach and it's definitely not outdated. _"how come they can launch a crew mission without a clear flight data"_ ? They collect tons of sensor data every single flight and improve the rocket with every mission. _"They didn't even have a payload test that safety"_ Sure they tested New Shepard's safety _"How come they are ready for crew missions?"_ How come SpaceX is ready for that? Engineering, testing, testing, testing and certifications..

[@JocheProHD10]

@@falafeldurum2095 development of starship started in 2016, while development of the raptor engine started in 2012. and bo are expecting a first launch of new glenn in late 2022. bo are definetly making some progress, but they are taking the nasa approach, they are going slow, and spend a lot of time and money researching. spacex on the other hand go fast, use all the data that they get from launches and are able to develop a rocket very quickly, and relatively cheap. spacex are expecting an orbital launch of starship in july 2021, about 5 years after development of the rocket started. bo are aiming for a launch in 2022 or 2023, roughly 10 years after development started

[@Antares2]

Blue Origin may not be the fastest to develop new things, but there is a lot to be said for the quality you get from careful and incremental development. Especially once you start putting human lives in harm's way, you want to make sure you've taken every step to prevent avoidable accidents. Good luck, Blue Origin. I hope to see more about New Glenn in the not-too-distant future.

[@Diggnuts]

And what is there to be said of the former CEO of Amazon who can't bloody deliver some engines on time? BO is a failure!

[@GreenJimll]

I see competition is heating up between Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic as to which company can spend the most billionaire cash the slowest getting tourists into suborbital flights.

[@vandalorian8777]

I think Spacex will beat them both.

[@benzed1618]

Oo

[@FluffyBlueCow]

"It looks like a huge ... pecker! No, that's not a woodpecker." How does nobody at blue origin see that Austin Powers gag every time they work on it? A lot of respect if it's intentional, even more if it's designed by Johnson.

[@kevinmount5896]

Why do you think it's called "Blue" Origin?

[@kworkshop]

I appreciate every rocket company.

[@taslimmuhammedmoosa3720]

Competition is a necessary aspect in everything. Go faster, Go bigger Blue-Origin.

[@mrcmoes]

In school they taught us "Abstinence is the safest contraception". Seems to be BO for the past decade. Hope this (and new glen) all work and loose thier space virginity soon.

[@adamrezabek9469]

"best part is no part, best process is no process, best passenger is no passenger"-Elon Musk 66%, Me 33%

[@AndrewSkow1]

Strange to describe your approach as "aggressive" when you're progressing slower than rocketry did from its inception.

[@risingmoon893]

""following an aggressive step by step approach" *Laughs in SpaceX*

[@StMyles]

Ok I’m ready to go... just got to save up for it.

[@mahadevan3536]

sweet

[@evanlittle6368]

Safety is their top mission. Actually getting to orbit is their bottom mission.

[@stefanklass6763]

Well I hope whatever you’re doing will land us on the moon during my lifetime

[@yashthakur7562]

Hahah

[@1997ss]

We will be on the moon in the not too distant future. I don’t know it’ll be THIS company, but it’ll happen. Don’t know how much longer you plan on living though.

[@lytrell1326]

No. I hope whatever you’re doing will land on me, I’m an earthling wanting insurance cash

[@jukio02]

The artemis program. We will go to the Moon in 2024, first woman. Then a few years later we will build a permanent settlement there. I'm sure China and Russia will do it, too.

[@stefanklass6763]

@@brendanariki ​ @Blu idk if you've been paying attention but blue origin is part of the artemis program, they will most likely build the lander to put humans on the moon. 2024 is not realistic, and I have a strong suspicion Blue origin is gonna be the one resposible for delay. the company is older than spaceX and they havent launched humans not even sub-orbital yet.

[@nikhilantony9329]

After all, the rocket is completely safe if you never launch it.

[@jayeshsaini1006]

Ye badhiya tha guru 🤣

[@shooterguitari328]

Bezos Lulli hilata reh jayega or Elon mars pe 4bachche or peda krlega, 😹🐕

[@NorthernChev]

Blue Origin, your top mission is NOT to ‘make safety’, it’s to ‘make money’. And I’m behind you 100%. Just don’t BS us with some PR piece trying to say otherwise. Yes, you are now getting to the point where you need to start fostering public confidence in your product, just don’t blur it with silly PR pieces like this.

[@frankreynolds9930]

Idiot. Since it its main mission is to carry tourist, it needs to be very safe to do so. Otherwise people confidence on it will not be there. Every business needs money to operate. Its not charity.

[@vandalorian8777]

Jeff who?

[@TheBowersj]

Blue Origin, Hoping you accelerate you rate of innovation, you've got an excellent safety rating, now rapidly produce some reusable boosters and fly new shepherd to space and see if you can win a NASA contract for ISS resupply missions. This will get your feet in the door for more advanced missions like going to the moon.

[@slaphappyduplenty2436]

Maybe go for orbit anything, then think about nagging NASA for resupply mission.

[@PsychicThursday]

No better way to prioritize safety than never flying humans or reaching orbit.

[@wk8219]

I'm excited to see what will happen now that Jeff is now just working on Blue Origin. He's been dividing his attentions up until now (Yes, I know Elon is both SpaceX and Tesla). I'm a big fan of all those working on getting us into the solar system. Can't wait to see New Glenn fly next year. To paraphrase Tim Dodd, "Go Team Space"!

[@SmokeDog1871]

They've determined the safest method is just to not launch anything into space

[@newhorizon3229]

Are they wrong tho?😆

[@seppothedestroyer731]

Blue Origin as the safest space company has decided not to send humans into space as it's deemed too dangerous.

[@johnwhorfin5050]

does Audrey remind anyone of ripley or is it just me

[@jamesshepard1606]

BLUE Origin Thank you for making sure your Spacecraft is Safe. If picked, I will be one of the first TEST humans to fly in your Spacecraft... BLUE Origin SpaceX and NASA is #1

[@KjStrunk]

What makes you think you’ll be picked

[@MACADEMIAC]

Well you got the right name.

[@LEDewey_MD]

Crew safety is #1 priority for SpaceX too.

[@VerrixD]

BO is very populist :D

[@austinbrito627]

That's Cute

[@travelsofmunch1476]

The vehicle is proven to be safe, they should have been launching folks 3 years ago. Lets go!

[@FPVSlacker]

It's a carnival ride, at best.

[@allanandliftedhands2669]

Imagine all this space companies working as one and not in competition..

[@adamrezabek9469]

monopol?

[@89boopathy]

That would be useless

[@darshansunar1619]

Jeff who

[@kakelso]

If safety is your TOP mission, you won't ever put a person on a rocket. #safetythird

[@aerohk]

Blue Origin? What's that

[@Scape921]

You've been around for 20 years and you've only launched 15 suborbital tests? lol

[@BnORailFan]

Yes, I just looked at the beginning of this video and their first launch was over 6 years ago. They're moving at government speed!

[@TheMrPeteChannel]

@@BnORailFan You know crew dragon was 5 years late. BO is not the only ones taking thier time. Starship was supposed to orbit in 2020.

[@mooserx4]

Mayb one day uz will go to space lol

[@porchmonkey5774]

Your top mission is to not send anything to orbit and then whine when established companies win contracts

[@cyborghobo9717]

Congratulations BO. Being picked up to Lunar nuclear tug competition is really great.

[@MACADEMIAC]

Blue Origin is doing everything right, they're in for the long haul.

[@antyspi4466]

Yep, a very long haul. Founded in 2000 and not a single regular flight yet. Spacex: founded in 2002; biggest commercial launch provider, flies astronauts to the ISS Rocket Lab: founded in 2006; 18 commercial launches to orbit Virgin Galactic/Orbital: founded in 2004; 1 commercial flight to orbit so far; still in test phase for human flights to edge of space As BO does everything right, what have these 3 companies done wrong, that they were faster in their development than BO?

[@MACADEMIAC]

@@brendanariki Perfect reply. I may add that the design for the purpose of space tourism ('thrill rides') is perfect. This is going to be a huge success, their professional approach is going to pay off.

[@TheMrPeteChannel]

@@antyspi4466 BO: first company to recover a booster from outer space.

[@ddandymann]

@@brendanariki I'd rather fly on the finished iteration of the Falcon 9, block 5, which has 60 successful orbital launches and counting with no mission failures.

[@kadincolbath9401]

Get something in orbit then we can talk going to the moon.

[@adamrezabek9469]

dynetics didn't get anything into orbit too. That's why they go in like a team and not as single company (BO)

[@Vollzeitidiot]

"Safety is so important to us that we just never fly". lol.

[@scoringdigitsson.5194]

Lol they’re getting there. Maybe 2069?

[@hvip4]

New Shepard is objectively awesome and super advanced rocket. How about you guys keep focusing on it and stopped maliciously, pointlessly and enviously delaying SpaceX and NASA contracts.

[@hourinfo168]

who know when can bring people to space?

[@brunamoggia8861]

C'è qualcuno dei miei amici li con voi?😉

[@jayeshsaini1006]

Jeff trying to give sympathy to himself 🤣

[@starshipsn1511]

I’ll pay attention when you do absolutely anything some what important

[@Rhezoloution]

Bezos flying it next month

[@starshipsn1511]

Late reply, but I said important, not useless

[@jesslyn4919]

#AwarenessConsciousness

[@amjd2569]

Your road to space is barely an unpaved footpath so far

[@danielh3367]

He Jeff, ate you not interested to fly to space? Since years only small jumps whyl others making there job already.

[@yves3560]

I believe Blue Origin´s approach with a separating crew capsule is way safer than the Starship system. After all we have decades of experience with separate crew capsules reentry and landing. Call it old fashioned if you want.

[@shooterguitari328]

Re-entry? Buddy, it didn't cross the karman line, Has no heatsheald Blue origin is fooling people like you, 😹 its just go up and down Space company with no plans to go to space, lol

[@odisy64]

re entry? they never made it to orbit, what are you talking about?

[@jiiji_jp]

イーロンも頑張らないとなぁ〜失敗続きで、とても人間が乗れる状況では無いからな。

[@Lumineer_Cars]

never had safety untill jeff bezos said he wanted a ride

[@koszmara]

this guys said that they just repeat the same tests from flight to flight........please explain why ? no rush...?

[@koszmara]

Jeff should cut some dollars.... then maybe they will stop repeating tests and will push this thing forward..... just a thought

[@dbreardon]

I guess you didn't watch the video. There were different tests for different flights. Only 2-3 were repeats for system tests.

[@shortyjy]

Did anyone else think that abort looked rather jarring at 3:42

[@serkanmehmetkaanbey214]

I bet they will eventually catch-up and beat spaceX

[@rodd1000]

Be careful guys and be sure you load the correct fuel. So looking forward to the next 14 launches of this rocket. Breaking new ground with every launch 🚀 Imaginary people this time, what can we expect next? 🙄

[@graullas8981]

They ain't breaking shit.

[@rodd1000]

@@graullas8981 I’m sure they do take a break for a shit, a very long shit too. 😂

[@starshipsn1511]

Is this a joke, you want to compete with space x? 🤦🏼You have not even gotten something into orbit!! Actually, you haven’t even flown crew on a SUB orbital flight!! You have a 50 foot tall rocket, Jed who?

[@k0rpi681]

Like they said, "road to space". Meaning introducing space for millions of people to inspire them. After wondering for a while, I realized it's very logical and important step. Introducing space for wider population.

[@frankreynolds9930]

Blue Origin and Spacex isnt even competiting for same thing. Blue origin is primarily for tourism.

[@Muonium1]

neat. actually put something into orbit. 🥱

[@dbreardon]

give it a couple of years for New Glenn.

[@petermnz]

Yep safety first and a perfect record...oh thats right you have not sent anyone up yet. Just give up so little progress to show.

[@antyspi4466]

15 bloody test flights in six years with a completely reusable suborbital system. This is sub par.

[@EM10]

SpaceX is my dream company. BO is my safety company..

[@Kasmuller]

SpaceX is safe aswell They have even done multiple safe manned orbital spaceflights, BO hasn't reached orbit or put a human into space

[@EM10]

@@Kasmuller safety company as in safety school. Meaning BO is my backup.

[@Kasmuller]

@@EM10 oh you meant that kind of safety

[@golden_gloo]

Really, that lunar lander ladder wouldn't be great if an astronaut were to fall from it. It's extremely high compared to the Dianetics Alpaca so could prove disastrous especially when they are wearing EVA suits trying to traverse this ladder. Some of the Apollo astronauts have said they struggled with their ladder which was half as tall so it's a ludicrous design.

[@philiplongee1149]

NASA should’ve added Blue Origin to the pending lunar mission that was won by SpaceX. They’ve duplicated SpaceX’s reusability and safety protocols to maintain confidence, efficiency, and economy. I hope they’ll still provide lunar landing module design and future space station development.

[@alvianchoiriapriliansyah9882]

Maybe in the next recurring procurement

[@saimulhaque3345]

🌮

[@BearElTio]

Yeahhhh

[@jasons44]

Your asleep at the wheel÷

[@Diggnuts]

Well, New Sheppard is certainly not in any danger of reaching proper space any time soon! Is that a feature? BO FAIL!

[@Chris.Davies]

Mucking around in the atmosphere is pretty lame. Even when it's safe.

[@adamrezabek9469]

what have you done?

[@arimitchell6364]

Yet they have the worst safety record

[@Brommes]

reentry .. lol

[@golden_gloo]

20 years and not a single thing in orbit, you're really lacking the ambition to succeed in the space industry when Elon can more than what you've done in as small as a 5 year period or about.

[@adamrezabek9469]

they have big ambitions, but they don't need to hurry.

[@golden_gloo]

@@adamrezabek9469 Just wait until continually innovating companies like ULA, Sierra Nevada Corporation, Rocket lab and Spacex leave them behind.

[@frankreynolds9930]

@@golden_gloo Dont think any of those companies is primarily doing Space tourism. It has big prospect in near future and Blue Origin is doing fine. They are funded by one of the richest man on earth.

[@siphotheguy1870]

By "astronauts" you mean tourists. Trying to act like you in competition with Musk when you more like Branson level at the moment. Sub orbital space tourism isn't going to be much more than the latest bungee jumping. And fuel costs per flight vs passenger numbers will mean it will never be a mass market product. Ramp up yr game before you miss the boat.

[@yootoober2009]

These guys should just not do any videos about what they plan to do...they should just do it., then talk about it later....

[@adamrezabek9469]

they can do both simultaneously

[@cristofersaezvox]

🐢 🥱 you Will have my attention when you launch something to low orbit

[@jorgerangel2390]

This is real work and not that mummers show that Elon is doing

[@bluemountain4181]

The mummers show that launches astronauts to the ISS, currently one of only two organisations in the world able to do so?

[@Singleraxis]

This is basically a giant themepark attraction that shows the edge of Earth for about 2 minutes. If you recall launching Astronauts to the ISS a show, then I'm not sure where you're at with your head, but okay.

[@brianbassett4379]

I bought a Sony Betamax in the 80s along with a Trinitron and a few other Sony products that should have dominated the market at the time but didn't. Sony was Sony's own worst enemy when it came to marketing their products... and that's what I see in Blue Origin. An innovative approach to commercializing space flight that puts safety 1st but also shows some respect for those that have gone before them. Musk just wanted to be the 1st Uber sociopath making money in space by using new materials and production methods to continue doing it the same old way stealing any and every new idea he could along the way like with any other company he is tied to. Whereas Bezos wanted to innovate and perfect the process on his own dime... space exploitation at its finest. The day going into space became about profit I lost interest.

[@Singleraxis]

New Shepard looks something woman like to hide in their closets.

[@starshipsn1511]

O no

[@graullas8981]

Jeff who? Ahh this guy running old space company that does nothing! Even if you fly a crew, you will still be a joke.

[@SuperMakannasi]

Very boring video... #WeNeedNewGlenn