Salt in the Ocean Points to a Young Earth

📕 Get your FREE copy of The Creation Answer Book here: creation.com/4...
It is one of our most recommended resources. Chapter 4 deals with dating methods and the age of the earth.
📺 Watch the full episode here - • 5 Signs the World is Y...
-with biologist and science communicator, Dr Don Batten
eNewsletter: creation.com/i...
Facebook: / creationministries
TikTok: / creationministries
Instagram: / creationministries
X: / creationnews

[@SacredReason]

GLORY BE TO THE FATHER, TO THE SON, AND TO THE HOLY SPIRIT, ONE GOD ALMIGHTY. HALLELUJAH. AMEN.

[@KC9UDX]

Blessed be The Name of He who was, who is, and who is yet to come, world without end, amen.

[@Abidingingrace-p6z]

Our God is so good. Creationism is the best thing to happen to Christianity since the reformation. Love you guys.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

What a blessing this channel is. Thank you.

[@muppetonmeds]

It seems like if the oceans were as old as they claim that over time they would become like the Dead Sea with too much salt to support life?

[@richardgregory3684]

No, why would that happen?

[@muppetonmeds]

@@richardgregory3684 If you noticed I didnt state it as a fact. It was more of a could have. TC

[@pigzcanfly444]

There are actually brine pools on the bottom of the ocean which are extremely volatile to life. Creatures that enter it often die of toxic shock just being close or grazing it's surface. The salt content of the oceans is indeed rising and though it would not entirely mimic the dead sea it would eventually have entire underwater seas of brine much larger than we see today.

[@unkle_Enkil]

The oceans came a lot later than the land masses. Before the last ice age the sea levels were lower. The oceans as we know them probably looked much different.

[@PETERJOHN101]

​@@unkle_Enkil Your knowledge claims are not a substitute for proof of said claims.

[@loveunlimited777]

The Holy Bible is the truth. Praise be to God forever. ❤️

[@pastorbarnett3049]

Good video. I took some classes from Dr. Austin back in college. He is a very intelligent professor.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

All of creation testifies to our God. Amen CMI 🙏🙏🙏✝️🕊️

[@richardgregory3684]

Was he just in a bad mood when he created cancer, smallpox and malaria?

[@MathiasVIKING0403]

​@@richardgregory3684these are bodily responses to something the individual themselves came into contact with. Basically,free will choice is what it ultimately boils down to. What's terrible to us doesn't matter in the eternal afterlife.

[@MathiasVIKING0403]

What implicated that God was in a bad mood when creating necessary physical illnesses ? Is it the fact that you personally find these things as "terrible"? Why do people put their own emotions as to how God feels? ​People really shouldn't personify God,and limit God to they're own level of understanding. It's absurd to think we can ultimately understand GOD😂. @@richardgregory3684

[@KristianHannler]

Great video!

[@vigiler]

New sub here: great content! I'm looking forward to seeing more subjects covered :) Thanks for what you do!

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

God bless CMI. Appreciate the video.

[@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fh]

The Earth appears to be very young, like 6000 years.

[@MrLogo73]

The Eiffel Tower can't weigh 6000 t. It can only be 25 kg.

[@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fh]

@MrLogo73 You cannot date anything by the speed of light. You only need to look at the foundations, which cannot occur naturally. The cosmos was created supernaturally.

[@imankhandaker6103]

...with wrinkles like the Grand Canyon? You sweet talker...

[@wardraven8755]

@@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fhso basically you can’t explain it therefore god.

[@crapton9002]

@@wardraven8755 The God of the gaps is still trying, but those gaps keep diminishing. With all that is happening, it is hardly important either way.

[@seasquawker]

We lose hundreds to thousands of animal species every year to extinction. How could evolution ever keep pace with this extinction rate? By this current rate, with about 2 million animal species left on earth, we are looking at every species being lost in just a few thousand more years. How could evolution ever add species to our animal kingdom when suffering losses like this? By necessity there would have needed to be a very unnatural utopian era in earth's past so we could have a net gain of species. And this utopian era would have needed to last for millions and millions of years. If evolutionists insist on this, which would be the only way of explaining our great biodiversity we currently have, then they are in effect arguing for a Garden of Eden scenario as found in the Bible. Only, we of course know God doesn't need millions of years to create life.

[@RS54321]

Not to mention that time is the enemy of evolution.

[@johnpritchard8946]

I've just looked up the extinction rate and it's in the tens not hundreds of thousands. This rate is way faster than the natural background rate. The estimates are highly variable of course. The whole of the Paleozoic which started with the Cambrian explosion saw more species evolving than going extinct and the development of life on land. This was after the Cambrian explosion that took place in the oceans.

[@richardgregory3684]

_We lose hundreds to thousands of animal species every year to extinction_ Largely due to human activity. _How could evolution ever keep pace with this extinction rate? By this current rate, with about 2 million animal species left on earth, we are looking at every species being lost in just a few thousand more years. How could evolution ever add species to our animal kingdom when suffering losses like this_ It won;t, unless the causative factor stops. There have been many mass extinctions in the past due to natural disasters. Some life has always survived though. And then that life diversifies and occupies the now empty ecological niches with new species. Mass extinctions are followed by rapid population expansions and diversification. The problem this time is that the natural disaster is us, and we may not stop, so the loss of species may continue and there will be no bounce-back from it. _By necessity there would have needed to be a very unnatural utopian era in earth's past so we could have a net gain of species. And this utopian era would have needed to last for millions and millions of years_ It doesn;t have to be utopian at all. Kust sufficient for living things to survive and propagate. But yes, earth has experienced very long periods of stable conditions that are favourable to life. We are living in one right now - or were, until we decided to screw it up. _then they are in effect arguing for a Garden of Eden scenario as found in the Bible_ No _Only, we of course know God doesn't need millions of years to create life_ Well of course, if you're willing to believe in invisible wizards who can work magic, anything becomes possible.

[@seasquawker]

@johnpritchard8946 Hundreds to thousands. Not hundreds of thousands. We would have everything be extinct in about 20 years at hundreds of thousands. But even if we only lose 1 species each year, this is a rate that evolution cannot keep pace with. As you just proposed, we therefore need some utopian-like era that defies what we've seen throughout the rest of natural history in order to reach the biodiversity we have today. This biodiversity would have needed to have been reached thousands of years ago and not millions. Because how many species could earth have had? Even with just losing 10 species each year, that would mean we would have 650 million species 65 million years ago. 6.5 billion species if it's 100 lost each year which is closer to what we currently see. This would require practically everything born to be a different species from its parents.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

Amen CMI 🙏 thank you

[@boni2786]

Great!

[@philipbuckley759]

it seems to be a straight forward answer...

[@douglaspinsak1246]

Everything is about 6,000 years old. 🙏❤️✝️

[@pureblood7775]

3970 - Jesus Christ was conceived in Nazareth, and born in Bethel in Judah, Mat. 1. 3970 years from the creation, and in the 42 year of Augustus Caesar. Based on that number, the Earth today is 6024 Years Old. "God planted the fossils in the ground to test our faith!". - Some Lady's Parents Friend 2024

[@gadget348]

@@pureblood7775 did he also put DNA into a wolf so we could turn his beautiful creation into a pug?

[@leemar2033]

@gadget348 yes, it's called speciation.

[@gadget348]

@@leemar2033 so he isn't creating the perfect beast then... interesting.

[@Sthabsent]

That flood would have added a lot more than other years

[@entombedlamb5356]

The flood should have equalized the salt content when the whole world was covered. The salt that went to land would have formed salt flats when the water evaporated. The water that rained back down would have had an opposite effect diluting the ocean waters, not increasing it.

[@CosmicExplosion]

Where is the live webinar with Paul James-Griffiths? I can’t find it

[@DavidDrew-n6z]

Salt has been being added to the sea since when?? Somehow this fails to account for a global flood or other possible factors. Including that quite possibly the ocean was already somewhat salty. This really doesn’t disprove deep time. There are too many additional factors unaccounted.

[@IslandUsurper]

Having the ocean start out salty *reduces* the amount of time it would take to reach the current salinity, meaning it would be that much younger. As for a global flood, that would wash a lot of minerals into the ocean too, but if you’re willing to believe that, might as well believe all of Genesis, you know?

[@entombedlamb5356]

@@IslandUsurper As far as 'might as well believe all of Genesis, you know', you do realize that you are on the Creation Ministries channel? That is kinda what they do here, its the theme for the whole thing.

[@anthonydooley3616]

Don't forget about the flood! That would have added an awful lot of salt in a very short period of time, like a year of time.

[@houstandy1009]

Steven Austin, he’s the 6 million dollar man not a scientist.

[@blank-964]

👍

[@anttisalminen1110]

How did this young earth had time to collect so much salt into oceans? and if the earth was created for the profeciced destruction, by God, salt was of no cocern

[@Grandliseur]

I am sure hope God has a process in place to balance things. He usually does. It's an interesting subject that together with the study of ocean sediments being too rare could give us some idea what's going on. The deluge itself changed so much, making oceans deeper and other things I do not know about. There seem to be quite a few submerged structures and cities under water, even deep waters. Perhaps the Azores pyramid and the Cuban very deep structures are among the deepest known unstudied places.

[@carloseunice5924]

The waters were here before the earth

[@Beatriz-pz1lt]

Nobody knows.

[@allegory7638]

There's a lot of variables that no one was around to know: worldwide rainfall and climate through the ages, ocean levels through the ages, and two world-wide floods.

[@criticalthinker8007]

Really, there are too many assumptions, unknowns and limitation to use the salt in the oceans to provide any meaningful calculation. Most of the analysis has for example assumed a reasonably constant water and air temperature.

[@bbl5499]

2 Esdras 6-42 Upon the third day thou didst command that the waters should be gathered in the seventh part of the earth: six parts hast thou dried up, and kept them, to the intent that of these some being planted of God and tilled might serve thee. Sounds like the oceans we see today are post flood, as this proportion has been turned in favour of water now with around 70% covering the earth.

[@richardgregory3684]

Oh please, the mechanisms by which the ocean salt levels remain relatively stable are well understood. Up to four billion tons of salts enter the ocean waters annually, but the same amount gets deposited on the ocean floor as minerals - the oceans are a classic example of homeostasis, where two factors reach a balance point.

[@pigzcanfly444]

It's not homeostasis. The word you're looking for is equilibrium and the oceans have not reached a state of stability because the salinity has indeed increased over the time we began tracking. As someone who once was a QM on a submarine I can personally attest to this fact. Salinity deposition and tracking was part of our job and it has a major impact on the buoyancy of vessels especially ones that are submersible. Do not pretend to have understanding of concepts which you clearly have no experience in measuring or dealing.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@pigzcanfly444 You're right, it;s equilibrium, homeostasis is living systems. Same principle though. But salt in theoceans doesn;t point to a young earth. They've been much saltier in the pas. t

[@pigzcanfly444]

​@@richardgregory3684prove that the oceans were saltier in the past. That is a claim that no scientist is making and in fact it would only make your entire theory impossible because it requires cellular life that can withstand harsh conditions from the start which would mean a more viable cell and genome type from the very beginning instead of one that is slowly adapting over time to meet the requirements of its environment. Not only that but salt is ionized in many cases and can be extremely volatile just to biochemical components in general in this state. This would not preserve but rather cause serious degradation of the building blocks needed wven to start life in at all. I would suggest that you actually try looking into these issues instead of promoting ad hoc responses due to a desire not to accept well known facts like the salinity of the oceans is rising and not in any state of flux.

[@mikebrown9850]

No one can convince anyone of anything they don’t want to believe. I don’t think the young earthers comprehend how the Bible allows for an old earth but a young (re) creation (Psalms 104:30).

[@SheridanFalkenberry]

I don't really see anything in this passage indicating that the renewal referred to is offering a reinterpretation of the Creation account :)

[@trevorgwelch7412]

Mother nature always keeps everything in balance . Earth is 4.543 Billion years old .

[@waukivory2756]

Prove it

[@Doc-Holliday1851]

How do you account for the apparent fact that the salinity of ocean water is stable?

[@IslandUsurper]

But it’s increasing…

[@Doc-Holliday1851]

​@@IslandUsurper not from what I'm seeing online.

[@IslandUsurper]

@@Doc-Holliday1851 OK, because no one would lie on the internet to prop up their worldview.

[@IslandUsurper]

OK, that was rude of me. I apologize. But when there are conflicting facts being presented, we need to see the data and the methodology, and get other people to try to gather the same data too.

[@Doc-Holliday1851]

@@IslandUsurper There is no data, I can find that indicates that the ocean is getting saltier. So that puts this entire theory out the window unless we can show that it is.

[@wardraven8755]

Love how they come up with these new theories with no evidence to back up their claims. But then they also have yet to prove god so

[@nathanielalderson9111]

What do you mean by "prove"? What do you mean by " god"?

[@IslandUsurper]

@@wardraven8755 you think the paper he cited didn’t have data to back it up when it was published?

[@caesarskiba9008]

They are literally describing the scientific process dude. Everything points to a divine Creator. Jesus's existence is undisputed fact. The only position you can take is whether you think He is God or not. The Bible is a documentary of first person witness accounts.

[@anthonycrumb5753]

Could you please do a program on the 'Heat Problem' - the fact that if the Earth was around 6,000yrs old the heat given off by radio active decay at it's present rate would have incinerated the planet many, many times over. Please do not say well the rate varied in the past and then try your best to make the evidence fit your foregone conclusion about the age of the Earth based on Bishop James Usher's calculation.

[@georgebond7777]

The lead in zircon crystals suggests the earth is old due to uranium decay but the helium in the zircon crystals suggests its young through alpha decay of the uranium. If there was a heat problem the short life daughter elements radiohalos and fissures would have annealed. That's your conundrum, we can explain it via accelerated decay similar to the observed z pinch experiments where these radioactive elements and their daughter ratios are found to be the same as those found naturally, oh and the process is adiabatic.

[@OlegLankin]

There may be a natural explanation. However, let's say there wasn't. Unlike atheism, we do have the supernatural that is a legitimate explanation in our worldview and belief system. It shouldn't come as a surprise to you. I have yet to hear a "problem" that can't be explained supernaturally.

[@anthonycrumb5753]

@@OlegLankin Ah yes ! the 'supernatural" explanation that always works, magic defeats science yet again, problem solved !

[@leemar2033]

​@anthonycrumb5753 yes like the magical big bang. And the fairy tale of everything comes from nothing. Ha.

[@OlegLankin]

@@leemar2033 that's right, except they believe in miracles that happen by themselves, from nothing, while we believe logically, that miracles are done by a supernatural God. Makes sense to me.

[@imankhandaker6103]

62 million years is more than 6000 years. This whole thing misses out what happens if the ocean cools - massive amounts of salt precipitate out. It also misses out the maximum amount of salt that saturates a given volume of water - eventually the clock stops ticking as the water cannot dissolve any more. Just because your watch stops ticking - doesn't make you young. Or the world would be full of smashed watches.

[@aarong8457]

He said that they calculated using those parameters, and it's not just about solubility the water is running off the land into the water. Nothing to do with dissolving it.

[@charleskruse4461]

@@imankhandaker6103 then why is the Dead Sea so salty if the earth were millions of years old the sea would be saltier than the Dead Sea and nothing would. Be living there!

[@spatrk6634]

@@charleskruse4461 how much saltier would oceans be if they were million of years old?? what method did you use to calculate that? why is dead sea saltier than oceans if they were both created 6000 years ago?

[@davidarvingumazon5024]

​@@spatrk6634 The Dead Sea is a terminal lake, meaning it has no outlet to the ocean. Its water level and salinity are primarily controlled by evaporation, precipitation, and human activities. If the Earth were millions of years old, we would expect the Dead Sea to be much deeper and more saline due to the accumulation of salts over time. However, its current depth and salinity levels suggest a relatively young age.

[@spatrk6634]

@@davidarvingumazon5024 dead sea is 2 million years old. so yea its relatively young

[@travisspace7786]

The salt is recycled through the icebergs 🥶

[@Elohimists]

When God flooded the earth in the time of Noah, the fresh water rivers and streams mixed with the ocean and diluted the salt content. The sun moon and stars were not made until the Fourth Day. Therefore the timeframe of the First Three Days cannot be determined. One day is a thousand years to God.

[@killz0ne215]

And yet plants were made before the sun sooo... what did they live off of for 1000 years? Trying to interpret creation into old age theology is not Biblically or logically sound.

[@Elohimists]

@@killz0ne215 Good question. Genesis 1:1 In The Beginning Elohim created the Heavens and the earth. Elohim is the Hebrew word used in the first chapter of the Bible. It means Gods. Other scriptures tell us that God is One but it does not say one being, yet Elohim was one being because in John 1:1 In the Beginning was The Word. The Word "was" God and the Word was "with" God. People will tell you that Jesus and God were together in the beginning but that would be wrong. There is only one God. When Elohim said Light Become! Or literally, Light Be! Light became: The Light of the world. John 8:12 The Bright Morning Star. Revelation 22:16 Psalm 33:6 By the Word of Elohim the Heavens were made and by the Breath of His Mouth all their hosts. (Angels) Elohim became Yahweh (Genesis 2:4) And His Words became The First Born of All Creation. Colossians 1:15 Revelation 21:23 And the City has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, because the glory of God illuminates the city, and the Lamb is its lamp.

[@SheridanFalkenberry]

Please see this article here! creation.com/one-day-is-as-a-thousand-years-warning

[@jimmunro2136]

So many gullible people in one place.

[@panoslymperidis6748]

if the earth is 6000 years old, then how old is the sun, and all the other stars in the universe? how about the other planets? black holes? neutron stars? etc? does the bible/ creation theory tell us?

[@IslandUsurper]

Slightly younger, by three days. How has the light reached us from so far away? Good question. There are smart folks thinking about it, but it’s awfully hard to figure out from here. Something quantum and relative, most likely.

[@panoslymperidis6748]

@@IslandUsurper so what you are saying is that stars whose light travels for millions/billions light years to reach earth just now, is emitted from something only made 6000 years ago.

[@OlegLankin]

​​@@panoslymperidis6748 the Bible says that God created light on day 1, before the sun, moon and stars existed. I think it may be a reasonable guess that on the day that he created the stars, he may have at the same time created the light between them and us, out of nothing, as he did on day one, because he created the stars for us to see them right from the start, not waiting billions of years.

[@paulgreen3361]

Stars are not what the fake scientists say they are, stars are wheels in a wheel that have eyes on them, the wheels spin and inside is an angel, a shooting star is a fallen Angel. The North star never moves but the rest turn. I’m a flat Earther and I will never go back to believing the globe Earth again, we were lied to by fake NASA, and NASA was created to hide the living God. Instead of laughing at flat Earther’s just do a little research.

[@OlegLankin]

@@all_bets_on_Ganesh probably

[@crapton9002]

Assuming? That will always be the Achilles heel of faith in anything. Then there are the icecore samples.

[@georgebond7777]

What about the ice cores?

[@crapton9002]

@@georgebond7777 They show a much older Ocean. How do you square that?

[@georgebond7777]

@@crapton9002 tell me how?

[@SheridanFalkenberry]

See this article here! creation.com/state-of-creationist-ice-core-research

[@Warriorking.1963]

Why is this even important? Nowhere in the Bible is the age of the Earth mentioned, because it plays absolutely no role in the redemption of mankind. What it DOES do, is to cause division within our own ranks, and ridicule from those outside of the Faith.

[@killz0ne215]

Because the evolutionary belief is contradictory to the truth that God created everything. And that the very nature of evolution and death over millions of years negates the need for a Savior who paid the price of death for our sins. It would also call Jesus a liar when he speaks about creation.

[@scottb4579]

If the earth is billions of years old, God doesn't exist. He has a certain character and nature, and the scenarios presented by an old earth scenario would necessitate God violating His character and nature. If He violated His character and nature, He corrupted Himself which is impossible. Thus, if billions of years have elapsed since the beginning, God doesn't exist. Yet He does.

[@Warriorking.1963]

@@scottb4579 Show me the age of the Earth in the Bible?

[@scottb4579]

@@Warriorking.1963 Sure. We know it's about 2000 years from the time Jesus walked the earth until now. Secular historians all agree Abraham was a real historical person, and he lived roughly 2000 years before Jesus. That's roughly 4000 years of history. The ages of fathers at the births of sons are given in Genesis. We can add the years from Adam to Abraham and we get 2008 years. Thats 6008 years of history roughly. Not an exact figure, but it's a pretty tight ballpark figure. The days of creation are 6 24 hour days, with Adam being created on day 6. So we have a little over 6000 years since the beginning of the universe.

[@Warriorking.1963]

@@scottb4579 But you're missing the point. Genesis 1:1-2 says "In the beginning... darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters." We both agree on that, yes? The problem is, there's no reference to the amount of time that passes from the end of Verse 2 to the beginning of Verse 3. Conditions might have stayed like that for millions - billions - of years, we simply have no way to know. This is the problem, Archbishop Ussher was able to calculate how long the generations took to work through, that's fine, but he didn't know how long the planet was in existence before God started creating life on it. Not that it makes any difference, because the age of the Earth has absolutely nothing to do with how we find Salvation; if it did Jesus would have talked about it. So really, sir, if you want to believe the Earth is six thousand... ten thousand... or any other age you wish, more power to you, because in the end it's just a meaningless distraction that Christians really shouldn't argue over.

[@biblicaltheologyexegesisan9024]

and the firmament in the sky points to a flat earth with a dome over it

[@sliglusamelius8578]

That is not the biblical claim at all. The "firmament" is a bad translation of the Hebrew word for the expanse of the sky, "raqiya". Nothing says that the earth is flat, all societies in antiquity knew of a spherical earth..

[@leemar2033]

Ha.

[@SheridanFalkenberry]

See this article here! creation.com/is-the-raqiya-firmament-a-solid-dome

[@jannaswanson271]

And on the second day Yah made one thing, His firmament over the Earth that separates the waters above from the waters below. On the fourth day He created the sun, moon and stars and set them within His firmament. We do not live on a spinning ball in endless space.

[@MrLogo73]

The first earth came to be when Dâyuni'sï, the little water beetle, came down from the sky world (Gälûñ'lätï) to see what was below the water. He paddled over the surface of the water, but found no place to rest. He dived to the bottom of the water and brought up some soft mud. This mud expanded in every direction and became the earth. The other spirits in Gälûñ'lätï were eager to come down to the new earth. Firstly, birds were sent to see if the mud was dry. The buzzard was sent ahead to make preparations for the others, but the earth was still soft. When he grew tired, his wings dipped very low and brushed the soft mud, forming mountains and valleys in the flat ground. When the earth was finally dry, all of the animals came down from the sky.

[@jannaswanson271]

@@MrLogo73 There are lots and lots of stories out there. It is up to each of us to search out the Truth.

[@MrLogo73]

@@jannaswanson271 But they say, that it's true.

[@jannaswanson271]

@@MrLogo73 I believe the Word of Yahweh. You get to choose to believe whatever you wish.

[@MrLogo73]

@@jannaswanson271 My question is: Do you care whether your beliefs are true?

[@stevecook413]

The 62 million does not include a world flood

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

We don't include any "62 million" in what we believe to be true.

[@robertallan6373]

Always trying in vain.

[@IWarpI]

Creationists proving yet again their complete and utter ineptitude in understanding anything including basic physics.

[@farcovidiu3110]

Evolutionists proved yet again that their only serious arguments are insults and rudeness

[@IWarpI]

@@farcovidiu3110 Pointing out objective reality is neither rude nor an insult. Nothing I said was rude or insulting. My point still stands. There is also no argument, the only people 99% of the time arguing or using ad hominems are Creationist's because they literally have no argument other than 'god did it'!

[@leemar2033]

​@@IWarpIwrong, creation itself proclaims it's creator. Get out of that cult of atheism.

[@stevelever83]

When are you going to get real scientists to ask the questions and critique the answers? You want us to believe the Earth is 6000 years old based on a book that claims Penguins and Echidnas walked to an Ark in a desert. Lol, riiiight.

[@SheridanFalkenberry]

This article addresses some of your objections: creation.com/how-did-all-the-animals-fit-on-noahs-ark There also seems to be an assumption in your statement that pre-Flood distributions of animals and landmasses were the same as they are today, which would not have been the case. creation.com/pre-flood-like-pangaea

[@rodneyvandenbosch1884]

1:41 not a scientific process, a mathamatical calculation. I thought you guys were particular on the science definitions...

[@globalcoupledances]

Wikipedia "Age of Earth" 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years

[@KylewithanL]

@@globalcoupledances are you saying because it’s on Wikipedia it’s fact?

[@globalcoupledances]

@@KylewithanL Based on articles mentioned in the scientific journals

[@KylewithanL]

@@globalcoupledances gotcha…something that has taken me my whole life to realize is “science” is the biggest religion of all. These scientists are made to jump through hoops in order to keep their grants, funding, etc. so I don’t just blindly follow “science” any longer. Sure, there are definitely very concrete areas of science such as computers and chemistry that can be proven or disproven with math…when you start to lump the more abstract areas like geology or gender studies in with those and take what they tell you as complete and infallible truths, well that’s when you become a fool. And I know you’re just going to say well you’re blindly following your “religion”…and this is where mine or your relationship with Jesus comes in. He’s the only one that can help you with that.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God knows more than wikipedia 😉🙏✝️🕊️

[@globalcoupledances]

@newcreationinchrist1423 - God of the gaps?

[@unclematt3134]

I do not agree. Explain the dating of Ancient rocks that go back 4.5 billion years.

[@JamesWoods-yu2kf]

@@unclematt3134 can you get 100% of all the geologists to agree that carbon dating is 100% accurate? Not all scientists will blindly 100% agree on most things becasue as you know there is alot of theory involved correct? Humans are not perfect,never will be and thus science was created to help understand the world around us but we will never know everything so your needing an explanation of "ancient rocks" is based on your belief that radiocarbon dating is 100% accurate when it is not and is certainly open for debate because it was created by man.

[@scottb4579]

Try researching the problems with radiometric dating.

[@SheridanFalkenberry]

Sure thing! creation.com/radioactive-dating-anomalies

[@warrencolegrove1]

I’ve never talked to an oceanogropher therefore I’m right. Boom