Same Story, Different Notation - Computerphile

[@MorRobots]

Professor Brailsford is by far my favorite Computerphile presenter.

[@sourcecode6467]

+MorRobots Yes, I totally agree. I always look forward to each one of his videos.

[@SUCACU]

+MorRobots What about Rob Miles, he's on my top list to be honest :D

[@sourcecode6467]

Yes, he's a bright young guy. Personally not my favourite, but great nonetheless. I like them all.

[@Zaurthur]

definitely in my top ten

[@MorRobots]

Rob Miles is like the "Im not saying its Ai, but AI!" of computerphile lol love his work on AI

[@braydentidwell]

Brings me back. Automaton, Grammars, and Languages was one of my favorite college courses. It really gives you a different perspective on the world of computer science.

[@AntonAdelson]

+Brayden Tidwell My uni forgot them completely :(

[@fuelofmil0]

+Brayden Tidwell Going to start my first automata course in some weeks. It's gonna be so much fun!

[@Triantalex]

ok?

[@Luketg8]

Only recently had to cancel my place at the University of Nottingham for MSc Computer Science by Study as I had gotten a very attractive job offer, after discovering these videos I have realised that it will be a huge shame that I won't get to learn from great professors like Brailsford, I absolutely love these videos!

[@mheermance]

I wish this professor taught my Automata class as he's engaging and very clear in his explanations.

[@dariokartal9453]

Yeah. Mine was overbearing (every time in class, he'd pick a student and dress him down in front of the hundred-strong audience - happened to me once) and was notorious for, as the rumor had it, having invented the Internet. I flunked his class twice. Don't matter, still probably the best class I ever took. The third time was the charm.

[@Triantalex]

ok?

[@chrissteward5435]

I don't believe it, A KZbin vid just gave me homework....

[@AmeshaSpentaArmaiti]

+Chris Steward don't forget to do your chores, and TAKE OUT THE TRASH!!

[@AntonAdelson]

+Chris Steward Haha, yeah! I'm confused, a little bit excited, and unsure. Like going out on a first date ever.

[@KilgoreOnDrugs]

+Chris Steward ahh ... Compilers course :)

[@KainusGulch]

+Chris Steward Fortunately, we don't have to turn it in if we don't want to. I want to make a KZbin channel some time, but not about computer thingies specifically. Unless it's gaming, maybe.

[@Triantalex]

ok?

[@datboi_gee]

"In order to get to sentence, we first must take an 'L.'" Everybody has to take an L sometimes, professor. I feel you.

[@WfrArcPol]

Me in class learning about FSA: I don't know WHAT the hell I'm doing, this is so boring Me at 2AM watching video about said FSA: I don't need sleep, it is Time To Learn™

[@Triantalex]

ok?

[@realraven2000]

and obviously we need to accept commas as end markers so we can declare a list of identifiers. In Javascript this is also a performance optimisation.

[@2Cerealbox]

I absolutely love this series! I hope you continue with this for a long time.

[@oafkad]

I'm genuinely annoyed I didn't grow up in the UK just for the off chance that I'd get to take a class from Professor Brailsford.

[@umchoyka]

Quite a switch-up on the film style for this one. I think I like this way better than the constant out-of-focus thing, but the lighting was a bit off. Interesting though, keep experimenting! :D

[@DrRChandra]

In C, identifiers (EDIT: or at least their declarations) can be terminated by "[" (array), "," (list of identifiers of the same type), whitespace, or ";", maybe others I can't think of at the moment. But as Prof. points out, most commonly, it's a ";", for readability/understandability.

[@ShanaTsunTsunLove]

+rchandraonline Well, putting thing like left square bracket as "[" is not complete because it wouldn't be C if you didn't have many decades of legacy cruft to ruin everything, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digraphs_and_trigraphs#C

[@kalleguld]

+rchandraonline It is terminated by any character that's not a letter or number (or underscore). "int a=b+c;" contains 3 identifiers, terminated by '=', '+' and ';'

[@DrRChandra]

Kasper Guldmann, oh, hmmm...I was thinking about declarations, not their references, but that's valid too.

[@kalleguld]

Oops, I misspoke. There are 4 identifiers, "int" is an identifier too.

[@DrRChandra]

+ShanaTsunTsunLove, "[" can terminate the C identifier's name, but additionally that does not completely describe the _type_ of the identifier. In other words, at "[" you know its name and that it's an array, but not how big, which in order for the compiler to accept it, you need the size (which can be null to specify an unknown size) plus "]". It begs the question, what is an identifier? I was thinking of just a name, which is separate from its characteristics such as its type and therefore its C legality.

[@paperclips1306]

I can hear this guy for eternity

[@ToeCutter454]

was I the only one impressed by the use of old dot matrix printer paper as scrap paper?

[@vcothur7]

Chomsky is everywhere

[@EtrielDevyt]

Chomsky is Love, Chomsky is Life.

[@joshuawade1495]

+EtrielDevyt Praise Chomsky.

[@fuppetti]

+Vikram Cothur Is it the same Chomsky who comments on politics and stuff?

[@wierdalien1]

+Deltaexio yes

[@SecretRaginMan]

+Vikram Cothur He's the Walpole of computer science.

[@pascalfragnoud2846]

Wait, am I missing something ? Semicolons don't end identifiers in C (and any language that I know of, for that matter), things that are not valid identifiers characters do (including the semicolon): spaces, operator symbols...

[@harrisonharris6988]

I thought a key characteristic with state machines is that they never know how they got into that state, but in the identifier example it must know how it got into that state as it must be able to work it out from the string it stored as it iterated through each character (i.e. to save the identifier name is must have concatenated a digit or a letter onto some memory string so it knows the name, however to do that it would need to have a memory to store it and so would know what caused it to reach that state, you could play it perfectly in reverse).

[@Theraot]

+Harrison Harris The actual constraint is that the ammount of memory used to represent the state doesn't grow - that implies that the number of possible states is finite - hence the name "finite state machine". And that disallows things as concatenating, or keeping track of the path to get to the current state. Yet there is no need to concatenate. Not with this state machine. --- The state machine is used by passing all the characters of the string to it, until: A) you reach the end state, meaning that the string is valid. B) you reach the end of the string, in which case the string is invalid. So, no it is not concatenating the string. --- But how do you take some source code and get what is what? Notice that this grammar is useless to implement a programming language - since it only defines an indentifier. While you may try to implement a language with a set regular expressions[1] and some inference rules[2]... In practice, what is actually done is to create a single (context free) grammar for the whole language - this is easier to maintain. [1]: One for each part of the language. [2]: A backtracking algorithm to choose state machines that represents parts of the language. The backtracking algorithms "knows" how it got into the current state - it is adding it to a stack. This means that it is not a finite state machine, and it also means that regular expressions alone are not sufficient to parse a programming language. You may have been warned to not use regular expressions to parse C, XML, Java, C# or anything like that, now you have an insight of why. Note: all regular expressions are context free grammar, the inverse doesn't hold. --- Once we go beyond regular expressions, - I hope - we will see that you can mark some parts of the grammar to emit tokens. That is done by cutting the string by the current position and emitting an object "token" with that string and tagged with the part of the grammar that produced it. In that case, you only need to keep track of you current position in the string, which can arguably be considered part of the state. The tag is what state it was when the token is emitted. That way you can have a grammar that takes "foo + bar" and emits {"identifier" token "foo", "operator" token "+", "identifier" token "bar"} - further processing is needed to interpret the token sequence, this is often done by building a tree, in this case it will have "foo" and "bar" as childs of the addition. Then you can walk the tree, doing the operations as needed to execute the code [or to emit the code in another language, such as machine language]. It is worth noting that if you use only postfix notation (ie, "foo bar +") you don't need to build the tree (you would use the stack instead), meaning that is easier to implement the interpreter / compiler. --- Also note that modern compilers - even if they are parsing a context free language - may add rules that are not from the grammar itself. These rules are used to emmit warnings and other code analysis - such as cheking if you are not using a variable. Describing such rules can't be done using context free grammars only - if warnings were to be emitted as tokens, the grammar would be context sensitive (see Ogden's lemma).

[@MrSlowestD16]

0:45 I think it's important to note that recursion is ONE answer when the length isn't determinant. I simply bring this up is because recursion is a good way to solve some problems while it's a pain in the ass to solve others using it.

[@squirrelbrains2197]

i wish all my professors, were that good at explaining things.

[@TrimutiusToo]

End marker can be semicolon, comma or whitespace (space, tab or newline)... in C that is... Lets not include arrays, as it should be a bit different parsing...

[@linkVIII]

This was posted during my lecture about this today. Wasn't in the mood to watch right after lecture.

[@kurtslagle797]

I wish my CS professors explained things this clearly.

[@konstantinrebrov675]

int _; is also a valid variable name in many programming languages, including C.

[@ariebrons7976]

if i understand this correctly: 1. detect a variable 2. get into a loop to definte the length of the variable 3. if you don't detect any more signals (letters) then get out of the loop.

[@vicplichota]

Looking forward to the next vid in this topic... :-)

[@D12golden]

I am graduated in Computer Science and I am still getting handouts from a professor.

[@AlejandroMartinez4]

I'm liking this series ^^

[@dmacmcmanus95]

Are there any other KZbin channels similar to this one?

[@QuantumFluxable]

+Dillon McManus Sixty Symbols and Periodic Videos for physics and chemistry, respectively. Steve Mould also does some interesting science videos from time to time. Applied Science is kinda similar, but for engineering and general mad sciencing.

[@josevillegas5243]

+Dillon McManus I'll add to the list Vsauce 3Blue1Brown Physics Girl Mathologer Mindyourdecisions standupmaths

[@josevillegas5243]

+Jose Villegas Frame of Essence Looking Glass Universe

[@josevillegas5243]

tggt00 are there any channels that you reccomend that are not on the lists? Also, just found another one: PhDComics

[@Zaurthur]

I have a test on this sort of thing in my theory of computation class on Friday.

[@AmeerFazal]

You are my Bro! :)

[@PixelOutlaw]

People wanting to break away from the norm C++ family and try recursion should do it in a tail call safe language like Scheme. You can learn most of it in an afternoon. :) It is in the Lisp family but Common Lisp (what people currently mean when they say Lisp) prefers looping and iteration or even better, applying functions to entire collections.

[@paperclips1306]

😅😅😅

[@RpattoYT]

I'm sorry to bring this up but I can't not mention this. Did anyone else notice that the Professor just said something to the effect of, "cumming back into to one's self" whilst poking at a phallic shape sketch he'd just drawn on some paper. Maybe it's just immature of me to pick up on such things but I couldn't help but nearly choke on my coffee.

[@CatnamedMittens]

Perverted minds.

[@RpattoYT]

CatnamedMittens :P

[@TheWeepingCorpse]

+rpatto92 I'm proud to consider myself a raging pervert. If the authorities knew what I get up to I'd be behind bars years ago. In fact I watch most of these videos naked, but that never even entered my dirty sordid mind. P.s masturbating is a form of recursion and like the prof said it can't go on for ever.

[@U014B]

Which begs the question: how does he expect that to be done? 😕

[@Triantalex]

ok?

[@midnightrizer]

Syntax is everything.

[@karlkastor]

This reminds me of the Haskell programming language.

[@firstnamelastname-oy7es]

Interesting video!

[@mmxbass]

"Any string of symbols A and B where there are equal numbers of A and B." It's funny how simple of a problem requires so much power. (Cannot be solved in the general case without an infinite stack machine.)

[@SixB0w]

Really interesting! Was always wondering why the semicolon was necessary. Why is it not needed in Python?

[@TheWyrdSmythe]

I always loved State Engines! So handy for any kind of serial input. Are you taking this series all the way to recursive descent parsing? :)

[@73h73373r357]

This raises the question, how does the compiler/interpreter know that there isn't an escape character? For example, "int i = 0;" will generate an integer called "i" with value "0" without errors. However, "int i = 0" throws a compiler error. How does the compiler know to throw the error?

[@tehlolzfactor]

I assume the only way the compiler knows that is because when you write int i = 0, the compiler sees that there is no termination character and assuming you wrote more code, it sees that a new statement has been made without a comma or other valid notation for having two statements. therefore the compiler resolves that you haven't placed a termination character. if there isn't more code after your initial statement. it's possible the compiler checks recursively through spaces and newlines in your code after that statement and at a certain point decides you haven't put a termination character

[@menachemsalomon]

The C standard comes with a grammar for the language, in a format similar to, but somewhat more compact than, the grammar given by Professor B. In your scenario, with the missing semicolon, the code does not become a "sentence" (to use Chomsky's terminology).

[@73h73373r357]

+Menachem Salomon I understand that. But that's too abstract. I'm looking for an indepth-view of how a compiler works. (yes i've read a bit online about that) but it's generally difficult to understand and an explanation would be quite nice.

[@Arganoid]

This refers to a previous 'car park video', but where is that video?

[@ropersonline]

It's a little annoying that the computerphile video titles, such as appear at 0:50 here, are generally different from the actual KZbin video titles.

[@philomath6190]

"You can't keep recurring forever. You will crash. You will run out of memory." Wait a second. State machines don't need memory.

[@ArnimSommer]

So, with Chomsky notation I can only combine two elements? E.g. S -> LTE would not be valid?

[@peppybocan]

1:03 '"... and those of you who are from electronics engineering department" ... and those from Mathematics dept. and from Computer Science dept. have no power here. :D

[@moatl6945]

Am I wrong, or doesn't »T->DT« violate the first rule that a »sentence« must _start_ with a letter (L)? On the other hand you won't get the semicolon on the last position, otherwise. Or is this just a »notation-problem«?

[@domagojpolancec6552]

+Martin Steindl The S -> LT production covers the "identifier must start with a letter" rule because L will always be resolved into a letter and it precedes T. The T part can be resolved either in a letter followed by another T part, a digit followed by another T part or an E part which in this case resolves into a semi colon which marks the end of the sentence. What's important to note is that S is the starting point of a sentence, i.e., we can not begin constructing a sentence from T, L, D or E.

[@kalleguld]

+Martin Steindl You must start the sentence at S. And since the only rule with S on the left side is S => LT, there's no problem.

[@moatl6945]

+Martin Steindl OK, I was wrong: I just overlooked, that T isn't the start of the »sentence«.

[@TechXSoftware]

When UNI taught me how to draw state machine diagrams, that wasn't it, lol

[@MrCrayfishMinecraft]

+TechXSoftware What Uni did you go to? Mine taught it exactly like in the video.

[@TechXSoftware]

MrCrayfish UWS, There is no start and end circles, arrows.

[@juggernaut93]

+TechXSoftware It's only about notation. I was taught to draw the accept state as in this video, but the start state as a circle and an entering arrow.

[@12tone]

I'm a little confused. Is this still considered a finite state automaton? The tail piece can in theory be arbitrarily long, so it has an infinite number of states it could potentially be in. Is this just a weird artifact of etymology?

[@DS127]

+12tone The *output* can be arbitrarily long, but here "state" is refering to what's going on "inside" the machine. The state machine only has one state at a time.

[@12tone]

Makes sense. Thanks!

[@SimGunther]

Spotted a wild popular youtuber! :D

[@joga_bonito_aro]

Funny. Just one week ago i wrote an exam about this stuff in my university

[@Oldiesyoungies]

start up the entomology channel again :(

[@DirtyRobot]

Haveaniceday;

[@sabriath]

EBNF is so much better though.

[@GegoXaren]

HAI 1.3 IM IN YR loop UPPIN YR var TIL BOTH SAEM var AN 10 VISIBLE SMOOSH "HAI! " AN var AN " AN SUCH!" MKAY IM OUTTA YR loop KTHXBYE

[@RussellTeapot]

+Gego/XAREN ゲゴザレン DAFUQ

[@GegoXaren]

Russell Teapot That is LOLCODE. It prints HAI! 0 AN SUCH! HAI! 1 AN SUCH! HAI! 2 AN SUCH! .... HAI! 9 AN SUCH!

[@samarthchaturvedi3926]

Why is he saying semicolon so much?

[@joshuajurgensmeier4534]

7th!

[@GtaRockt]

+Joshua Jurgensmeier Congratulations you won 1, I repeat, *1* Internet

[@commanderlake7997]

His thumb is creepy!