Sartre - on Bad Faith and being condemned to freedom - The London Psychology Collective

[@SharafatUK]

very productive discussion

[@PraetorClaudius]

It’s true that the person who knows they have made their choices, whether they regret them or not, seems stronger and more stable than someone who feels they are a “victim of essences.”

[@TheRana124]

Some people recognize they don’t have to make a choice when they try to avoid it. Not because of bad faith, but the circumstance is not appropriate. I think you are taking bad faith as a analogy that someone can apply to any interaction where there is a split between the selves. This choice to split oneself if never something an individual looks to do, but when asked there is a way of subduing the dilemma presented to them. That would be by recognizing that other may be choosing to ask on a certain faith. This faith can be either bad or good or neutral. Natural would be best, but in many case I don’t believe that women ask on neutral faith. I believe they ask on either good or bad. It is a matter of choice on their end. Though, by recognizing this the man may be able to avert the desire of the other to know by splitting the self only because the woman does not recognize her bad faith. By doing so they may have split themselves too much for the halves to be stitched together. The one course of action here would be to ask and answer in a manner that is neutral. In turn, there are no bad and good faith actors. That is why Sartre has a quote ‘Hell is other people’. Something along those lines. I don’t think you guys have truly understood Sartre

[@catashtrophe0]

This is interesting, this makes me feel so much more “free” knowing that actually I do have choices even if they might be hard or not great

[@catashtrophe0]

Is it rude to point out bad faith of other people?

[@TheRana124]

It seems as though there is one case where individuals ask/answer on either bad or good faith. Instead of having to ask/answer on neutral grounds. That would be when they are emotional and cannot recognize the way they are behaving or acting. It seems that with the inability to handle the necessities of the self and the other become weights when acting on faith. The choice becomes a leap instead of a step. This can be on any number of terms, but the recognition should implore individuals to not act on emotions, but use them to address the needs of the self and the other. Thought some choose to act on emotion instead of asking. Some see their ability to control bias as being better than other, but generally most people are bias and feel affirmed by it

[@yasha12isreal]

Preach Sister!

[@jimporter4799]

The only true 'fixed' identity is the changeless sense of presence.

[@buseekmekci2556]

so thanks

[@alex_pearl]

Is Terry single? He's quite attractive.

[@MutualAidWorks]

I enjoy your talks but-claim benefits in the UK of today and you will probably regret it very much. The only 'choice' is to work.