Facade (TypeScript Design Patterns)

[@cesarfusco8927]

Best explanation i've found so far. Wish you'ld continue the series...

[@sheacole1294]

This was one of the more helpful explanations of the Facaded pattern that I have found. I would be interested in seeing this implemented in vanilla JavaScript in a real world application.

[@Videosuser]

This was one of the more helpful explanations of the Facaded pattern that I have found(2)

[@PROFjavi]

hey! I like the way you did it but if anybody watching this wants to save some time you can just do this at the beginning instead.... I've commented out the boilerplate code, take a look at the differences in the constructor. class HomeTheaterFacade { // private bluray: BlurayPlayer; // private amp: Amplifier; // private lights : Lights; // private tv : TV; // private popcornMaker: PopcornMaker; constructor(private amp: Amplifier, private bluray: BlurayPlayer, private lights: Lights, private tv: TV, private popcornMaker: PopcornMaker) { // this.bluray = bluray; // this.amp = amp; // this.lights = lights; // this.tv = tv; // this.popcornMaker = popcornMaker; }

[@ThePri1707]

Amazing explanation Thanks a lot. Short. Sweet. Simple.

[@kimslava93]

Hey there! Thanks for making so simple and cool videos. I have a small question, in your video you are using let even for the constant values, is there any reason why are you using let instead of const? Is there any best practice rule to do it in this way?

[@simplyexplained]

Best practice is indeed to use 'const' whenever you can. I apparently forgot to do that in this video. The code still works, but as you said, better to use const.

[@hangchen6131]

Haha this is actually more intuitive than decorator and observer, which actually I have already been using.

[@remomagalhaes4707]

Very nice indeed

[@EdwinNiwaha]

You are the best

[@mohameddaho5203]

Great, thank you

[@enriqueruiz320]

😱😱😱

[@rayaqin]

Why do these comments seem so fake?

[@PROFjavi]

? your comment seems the most fake/non-contexual... just saying.