Scientists Claim Native Americans Have Aboriginal Australian Ancestry

[@rakhmire2]

The first people in East and South Asia were Australian-Melanesians. You still see their distinct features in places like South India, Papua New Guinea, Australia etc. These groups also intermixed with Denisovans. Clearly they also reached the Americas first and populated the South. That’s also why South American indigenous people look quite different to the North American natives who arrived later and look like modern East Asians.

[@jeromeisaacs4428]

That sounds about right

[@zachspade9980]

Abos have Native blood. They have it backwards.

[@arnulfoalvarez1743]

Can you explain why so many South Americans especially Perú and Ecuador early natives look also like Asians?

[@jeromeisaacs4428]

They say that Australian Aboriginies are descended from the First Homo Sapiens to leave Africa and head toward Asia 70,000 Years ago

[@rakhmire2]

@@arnulfoalvarez1743 They look part Asian but also distinctly different than North American natives who look pure Chinese / Mongolian. My guess is South American natives are a mix of first settlers (Australo-Melanesians) and later settlers (modern Asians) which the DNA evidence also seems to suggest.

[@MelaniaRose]

It’s not just the genetic similarities but the cultural connections. For example in Polynesian, Native American and Aboriginal cultures they believe that whistling at night calls on a ghost spirit.

[@mzeewatk846]

I grew up on Vancouver Island, and my granny told me to never, ever ever, whistle at night. She was born Cockney. Honest.

[@teresafernandez9849]

Exactly! Most Native ppl and tribes used some form of whistle language. My dad's ppl r from the Yaquis, he had a whistle to call us to come in the house, if we didn't come right away, he would do it again, but louder, we knew he was getting mad! Whistle language is very common among Native ppl from Asia.

[@sol-leks6122]

Aboriginal Ngoorabul woman from Australia here, amazing how we all have that superstition of whistling at night passed onto us.

[@maemae1752]

This belief exists in Central Europe also.

[@realpocahontas1776]

I am a Navajo Native American born for the salt people. Native Americans and Asian people have skulls classified as Mongoloids. I wholeheartedly believe that we are related to the Asian people, especially the Japanese. My dad looks just like a Japanese man and I always thought it was just a coincidence. Very interesting

[@maemae1752]

You might be interested in a comment lower down the list from a user @akiranaru9392. Talking about the Japanese/Native American connection. Our faces tell so much.

[@lucylovic]

Yes. And we all come from Africa. It has no bearing

[@maemae1752]

@@lucylovic out of Africa has been debunked so many times. Get with the times.

[@jdagreat4595]

Because you come from Siberia your not original from America

[@JonDoeNeace]

Depends on if we want to put it in cultural language or academic language.

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

My own personal interests are further back then this, but understanding later migration patterns helps us make informed guesses about the really early waves of a couple million years back. Thanks for posting this!

[@MM-yl9gn]

Definitely agree but shared genetic signatures along with material evidence suggests vast ancient seafaring and cultural exchange especially within the origin of major civilizations with a much more ancient connection extending farther in time than expected, actually.

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

@@MM-yl9gn Exactly, so what could earlier populations (I use that term instead of species) have managed? There is now proof that H. Naledi used fire, which many thought improbable.

[@MM-yl9gn]

Water management would be most important. I'm particularly interested in mound cultures and pre agricultural uses.

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

@@MM-yl9gn And that’s a fascinating time. Lots of changes. There are interesting links between so many cultures and the ancient Proto-IndoEuropeans, but they also had a predecessor and that’s that time and place. Ah, for a Time Machine!

[@MM-yl9gn]

@@waynesworldofsci-tech and we could be seeing this through a foggy lense if archeologists aren't searching deep enough or within the context of more ancient strata of the America's.

[@christophereckermann1838]

I'm Aboriginal from Australia. We're all related and share the same DNA as our other indigenous brothers and sisters. We share cultural beliefs from Hati and South American indians as well as North American Indians. We've known about this for a long time.

[@bucktooth002]

Hello cousin, I'm %10 Yaqui.

[@josecoope2211]

No humans are native to Australia. They came by boat.

[@wigzwhite99BC]

@@josecoope2211 Who claimed to be Human?

[@lynettebaxter2101]

@@josecoope2211 learn your true history.

[@josecoope2211]

@@lynettebaxter2101 My ancestors crossed a land bridge.

[@jackvoss5841]

Take a look at the aborigines on Taiwan. Then the Ainu on Hokkaido. See the facial features of the American Indian. Some of the DNA of people living in Australia comes from areas around Viet Nam. Maybe some American Indian DNA does too? These are fascinating set of puzzles. Man is a fascinating animal. A dangerous one too. Courtesy of Half Vast Flying

[@neddyladdy]

And humans will copulate with anyone.

[@hannobaali_makendali]

Northeast Asians are AUSTRALBINOS.

[@bitchcraftwitch351]

This theory suggests that Austronesian people were the first to migrate to the Americas due to their maritime aptitude and ability to make long sea voyages. Remnants of this theory still exist today, such as the traditional Polynesian tattoo designs which have been found among some Native American tribes. In addition, there are also similarities in terms of material culture, such as pottery styles and ceremonial activities. Furthermore, further genetic research has also supported a link between Austronesian and Native American populations. It has been found that both have a significant frequency of Haplogroup C1, a genetic marker found in a significant number of Asian peoples. This evidence has suggested that both populations share common gene pools and could have maintained a relationship for centuries. In conclusion, there is strong evidence to suggest that Native Americans and Austronesians have a deep-rooted relationship with one another. Through genetic and archaeological research, it has been found that both people groups share similar origins, material culture, and genetic markers. This suggests that they have not only been related in the past but also maintained contact over a vast period of time.

[@neddyladdy]

Is it a theory in the scientific sense, or an hypothesis? There is an immense difrerence.

[@colemanstarr5404]

I thought that too when i met Indigenous people from Taiwan

[@lindakato8583]

Wonderful DNA work. It confirms previous theories about the Asiatic/Polynesian origins of indigenous people in the Americas.

[@georgecuyler7563]

We sailed the Pacific in our Longboats that could measure 12' deep. We used both air sails and aquatic sails. We visited Japan, New Zealand Phillipines and many other islands and mainland Eurasia and Asia. The tracks go west across Beringia not east as we followed the game across, like horse's, moose, Camel's etc

[@kensounds5177]

there is evidence that the ancient Australian aboriginies had ocean going vessels and the later Polynesians definitely did and used them to go as far as Easter Island . So I can easily believe that Aborigines Micronesians and Polynesians could have made it all the way across the pacific.

[@bucktooth002]

So from Arizona to China, not from China to Arizona. Wow very interesting.

[@mzeewatk846]

I spent half a month’s pay and flew. : )>

[@georgecuyler7563]

@@mzeewatk846 did your arms get tired

[@mzeewatk846]

@@georgecuyler7563 737, but not business class. : )

[@scottowens1535]

We need to consider at the last ice age the water level was not only down but the Pacific was unloaded by tremendous weight therefore there would have been many more islands to hop and surely small bands of people surviving mini trips whether purposefully or not intended. So I would think it would be strange if there wasn't a big mix-up.

[@hannobaali_makendali]

@Andrew Nope. The poles are melting back to their pre-icy greeness. All the E-lites have yachts with helo pads. They know.

[@roncarpenter7240]

That might explain Easter Island.

[@hannobaali_makendali]

What's missing is: what IMPACTIVE force created the Marianas Trench and that Hawai'ian DEPRESSION? A megasteroid did. And it's not talked about for socio-political anti-catastrophist reasons that may disturb the present pseudo-paradigm’s (PATRIX) pseudo-pedagogy. It punctured the crust and gave us a volcano archipelago. West of Indonesia took a hit also. The Burckle Impact crater? Borneo has NO volcanos. That says what? ii have heard that when the moon was brought to orbitization it BUMPED into the Pacific before stabilizing in it's elliptic. Who knows.

[@hannobaali_makendali]

@Andrew NOT!!! u have been misled by Gradualists. Catastrophists know better. Pseudo-scientific fact is what u're PARROTING!!! WE're NOT buying your wooden nickel. ii hope u can swim.

[@hannobaali_makendali]

@Andrew Angels and Devils are well discussed more, meaning what? NOTHING! A Consensus Foolian u seem. So plate tectonics just be actin' on their own??? ii don't think so, Homie. Quit ostriching your self in yo fishbowl. ii live in the ocean of cataclysmic reality, not Rome's fantasyland. Quit jivin. Yo hustle is obsolete. That spiel/SPELL still dosen't amount to a hill of beans. Stop selling snake oil.

[@jfkfitirjdjjsisieirirjfjdj5967]

cool,this kinda proves what I was taught from my elders, that long before setters coming to Australia we used to meet with other nations from around the world over tens of thousands of years,it is said they came ere looking for sacred knowledge when it was the treasure and wealth of mankind 👍🏾

[@rumpleforeskin9543]

Who's your elder's

[@Kaisi-sp2mf]

Same what I herd. We had visitors coming and going before the British. And we do not come from Asia but was always here.

[@jenneyalberts1336]

It's obvious.

[@S.huddo-db3ew]

😂😂😂

[@oldtimers6460]

The Chinese Grand Fleet came to Australia met the Aboriginals and packed up and left. Nothing to see/trade here was noted in their books.

[@geecee515]

Amazing history, I did hear of a couple of these theories before but they were never proven. Thanks for sharing.

[@pmboston]

Sharing ancestry is not evidence that where they are found shared means that people sharing the genes went from where they ended up to where other relatives ended up. It’s a common error in these kind of ‘studies’. The sharing is farther back and somewhere else.

[@VeteranExpat]

Would be nice if you had the sources in your summary.

[@CurriedBat]

There is one link. Not a full reference list, but the video does mention at least two papers.

[@VeteranExpat]

@@CurriedBat mentioning papers is not the same as providing sources As a researcher; I always make it as easy as possible for my audience to find my sources

[@AdllerEsmeralda1]

Last time I read the Origen of aboriginal Australian was similar from the Tamil people India.

[@Shel230]

Well u didn't listen to this video

[@liamstacey419]

There are so many now submerged islands In the South Pacific, that is also possible that many more of these were inhabitable 20,000 years ago when sea levels were much lower. Many of these islands also sank because the continental plate was also sinking, or being locally pushed down under the weight of growing seamounts. The cultural parallels between some groups in South America and Australian aborigines is quite stunning.

[@liamstacey419]

@Gary Allen The main problem with looking for archaeological evidence is that any remains would now be underwater. We only have cultural , linguistic, and genetic remains in Peru, Chile and Brazil, as well as in Rapa Nui. On Google Earth you can see some bathymetry evidence of islands that are now submerged. You will see them as flat topped undersea mountains. They have a flat top because when they were above water they were weathered Until they were just atolls. They extend from French Polynesia all the way to South America.

[@simongross3122]

"Scientists Confirm Native Americans Have Aboriginal Australian Ancestry" is a very misleading title. It's far more likely that they have common ancestors.

[@scottschultz6573]

Well put

[@Sixrabbbit]

Millions of years ago...

[@simongross3122]

@@Sixrabbbit Possibly some sort of fish

[@jking4609]

Does this mean native americans are black or not their own race

[@simongross3122]

@@jking4609 Personally I think native americans are their own race, not that I am any expert. But I don't believe that they have Aboriginal Australian Ancestry. As I said, it's far more likely that they share ancestors from earlier, as do we all.

[@FOE-LEKA]

Makes sense. Native Americans look relatively similar to the native Australian/ Pacific Islander demographic.

[@agold2125]

Perhaps this is related to an explanation for the Olmec heads with larger features that looked more like African of Australian natives.

[@pedri5415]

Yes, something that connects to the... Black aboriginal - Ancient America (The Olmec: The First Great Mesoamerican Civilization)

[@Jrock4690]

@Gary Allen no evidence? Ivan Van Sertima would disagree. As would many other current and active North American scholars.

[@rustydogrustydog9191]

@@Jrock4690 North American scholars!? No one that has any legitimate qualifications in mesoamerican studies subscribes to the African origins theory. The Olmecs , Mayans, Aztecs, Incas we’re not African. They are of euroasian/ Siberian origin. Only Afrocentric culture vultures buy the other baloney.

[@rustydogrustydog9191]

Olmecs not Of African or Australian origin. Period

[@Jrock4690]

@@rustydogrustydog9191 No one? Sounds like a typical (fellow) American with questionable exposure to me. In the meantime, feel free to discredit the below scholars: Ivan Van Sertima Author J.A. Villacorta, Author David Imhotep Polish professor Andrzej Wiercinsk Historian Frederick Peterson Indian scholar, Rafique Jairazbhoy, Oh and by the way, let's talk about ocean currents used for ancient travel - The Benguala current off the coast of West Africa intersects the North Equatorial current which leads where? Current day Tabasco region of Mexico on the American Continent...

[@phillipbug958]

What are your thought on the Human Not Bound elongated skulls of Peru, Caucus/Balkan Mountains (of obvious humanoid species, similar to Denisovan, Cromagnon, etc) These are of earth with only 2 suture (skull closing at about mid-30s which humans have a ‘y’ 3 part skull closing & them 2 part)

[@shawncarter5619]

who's to say that these populations didn't come across the pacific and land in South America using the island hopping methods employed by the Pacific Islanders. Did they check the Easter Island population for the same genetic markers?

[@ghiggs8389]

Or perhaps they were all the original population of Antarctica that migrated north into Australia and South America.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

Polynesians didn't exist yet 40,000 years ago. They did go to South America about 1000 years ago, for sure.

[@teresafernandez9849]

They are pretty sure, the Aboriginals of Australia were in the Americas with the first migration from Asia. I love their story. They were so noble in their honesty. They found Australia empty with ancient abandoned culture. They said they didn't know who built the culture. They took nothing from the ppl of the past. They also said it was not their intention to go to Australia, they were exploring and started drifting and ended up in Australia. They were so noble in their honesty, we should all follow their example. It doesn't matter, when they placed that footprint on Australia, they gave Australia a rebirth, and brought back the breath of mankind to Australia. They had to be great sea travelers and intelligent and they survived in very harsh environment. I am from 2 Mexican Native tribes, I know a lot of Australia Aboriginals identity as Afro, but when I found out they are from the same place and share the DNA, I felt proud.

[@wylink7756]

I think that's most logic explanation. I believe it.

[@tedecker3792]

The Hopi believe their ancestors came to great turtle island (North America) via water/boats.

[@Grimloxz]

How come during the vast majority of this piece we are shown nary a picture of Australian Aboriginals, Melanesians or Papua New Guineans? We are shown a myriad of images of various people that are representatives of the indigenous folk who came by way of the Siberian crossing, but _not a one_ of the Australasians? There are vast numbers of their images available and would provide a stunning visual contrast to what people know as “native Americans”, but the creators chose not to? It is maddingly odd. After a while I tuned out of the audio because of how glaring an omission it is. And yes, I’m already familiar with the thesis presented.

[@you2angel1]

It makes a lot of sense to me that we have brothers and sisters Down Under °~•☆•~°

[@colinlanglo8043]

🖤💛❤️🦘🦘🦘

[@SevenDirty]

What are your sources? which scientists have "confirmed" this? I ask because the science is pretty settled related to genealogy, linguistics, archaeology, anthropology. There is something called "the migration of man" where a lot of different fields of science have a general agreement that all humans originated in east Africa. The 1st migration was to the rest of Africa, the 2nd migration was to Australia. the idea that Aboriginal Australians come from parts of Asia is not confirmed by scientist to my knowledge. Is there a source for any of this? If there is I'd like to find it.

[@MelaniaRose]

Aboriginal people believe they came from Australia originally. In their culture there is no mention of coming from any other continent.

[@donnacsuti4980]

Does not surprise me recent studies have indicated people first ( up to 40 000 yrs ago) came along the shore from Asia and then along the shore of Alaska and down the shores of North America and South America until they came to ice free habital land. This was done in boats over many thousand years they probably came in contact with Asian, Australian, and melanesian people and intermixed.

[@Earth2alx]

I mean it makes sense that North east asians AND Australo-Melanesian peoples would travel to the Americas. If its that east to sail the waters of the pacific to and from Oceania and Southeast Asia to South America then it only makes sense that they would have done that.

[@mcnicepidii3340]

Interesting topic and findings, Tho I gotta say...the digital narration on this is difficult to follow as it doesn't quite read right.

[@kenmcclellan]

One day, we might have sufficient DNA markers dumped into a supercomputer to really figure things out. But today? We've lots of presuppositions to be scrubbed. Lots of papers to be scrapped. It's like when I had my full mitochondrial DNA scan done, FT gave me a B4b1 designation. I sent the results to a researcher and she did some back and forth with them, suggesting they had ignored the importance of this or that marker. And next thing I knew, I was officially a B2. In the meantime, another researcher says my "group" is still not on the world phylotree, needing a few more related samples. So far, we've only three ...

[@Miki-fl9ez]

4:40. May be, rather than a different population per se May be a piece of ancestry that is 'hidden' among the general native ancestry, that later 'flourishes'

[@hannobaali_makendali]

according to experts some scientists say another study says in other words we still have suppositions.

[@meredithheath5272]

I do not know if this voice is computer generated, as the narrative is very choppy. Therefore, the narrative is too hard to concentrate on - too bad, because the knowledge within the narrative seems quite substantial.... Will have to revisit this some other time...

[@nmarbletoe8210]

yes it is a robo voice

[@lynettebaxter2101]

Aboriginal Australians DNA is 50.000 years old according to history books. My people believe 150.000 years. We did arrive here by boat...but we are the custodians of Australia. Colonisation would be about 300 year's.

[@rumpleforeskin9543]

You talking caca

[@monkeywrench2800]

Always fascinating content on this channel !!

[@revolvermaster4939]

How many migrations to the Americas left no trace?

[@stevensoto1710]

It’s not very surprising tho, the further south you go into the Americas the more south East Asian the people tend to look which they also share some ancestry with Australasians as well. Andamanese islanders are a sister group of eastern Asians after all

[@stevensoto1710]

@Gary Allen yes, but most would look like south East Asians generally speaking. There’s more facial similarities between a south East Asian and a indigenous American if we’re being honest tho

[@nettilee2696]

Anyway, columbus did say he found the "Indians" as the european at that time known as The Indies a.k.a Indonesian now a.k.a southeast asian. They look similar

[@hydrolito]

They would need to check every tribe they might not all be from the same place.

[@jessestreet2549]

i don't think we are.. my thoughts are that we came by land and sea, north and south, predominantly from the west with perhaps a sprinkling from the east. i've read Kon Tiki and The Ra Expedition by Thor Heyerdahl and he proved ocean crossings were possible by so-called "primitives". i find it hard to believe that homo sapiens indistinguishable from modern simply banged rocks together for over 200,000 to 300,000 years before the modern age.

[@awidda]

I love the bringing in of the DNA knowledge. As an archeologist, I would ask that the language be assessed. The Turtle Islands, or America's, are not the last to be settled by h. Sapien and there's even evidence they were first settled by h. Erectus, so many not the last settled by any species. North West Europe is the last to be settled by Sapien. As it wasn't out from under the ice till 27kya at its start, and not fully free until 7kya in some parts. Scandinavias earliest finds are 7kya. Ireland wasn't ice free till 8kya. And h. Sapien has been in the Turtle Islands for 33kya. Also. New World is a misnomer based on Euro centric thought and is out of use because it's offensive in the way it ignores it was two settled continents with at its lowest estimates 50 million ppl who had built more scientifically advanced societies (ie. Cleaner cities that were Huge, based on medicine and ecology that was far superior to the Europeans at the time). I couldn't get any further then the statement "The America's, also known as the New World" The America's is the name of a Spanish conquestador who is responsible for genocide so I totally get steering towards a new name. Yet it is better then an outdated term that erases 50m ppls existence and accomplishments. Thank you for your time reading. And for educating. The DNA evidence is particularly huge for the proof of existence of an ethnic group and how and when they got here. And it is something I work hard to educate on as well. Much love.

[@ianrobinson8974]

24/12/2022 Our Australian Indigenous people have been here for something like 200,000 years. As a wandering people it is not surprising that they also wandered north and accross the landbridge to the Americas. In the far south of Sth America there are a race of people who are identical looking to Australian Indigenous.

[@sahulianhooligan7046]

They wouldn't have been in Australia 200,000 years, that age range would make Australian Aboriginals a different human species almost from rest of the world, like an archaic human race that branched off early from homo sapians like Neanderthals

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@sahulianhooligan7046 Fair point, but also, 200k is in accord with the research if we think of "our people" as all of our ancestors, even the small contributions. Then we are gropuing H. sapiens, neanderthalensis, and denisova as a single group, and "we" left Africa a million years ago or something. So it is possible that some ancestors of modern Aboriginals were in Australia 200 kya, although there might not be evidence yet, idk. In any case, aside from the date of 200k vs 70k, the OP is correct that the ancestors of the Aboriginals seem to have been great travelers. It might be surprising if they did NOT get to the Americas, since they could have walked right over depending on the timing.

[@MelaniaRose]

If any group of people can survive a place like Australia, it’s reasonably to assume they can travel long distances

[@jenneyalberts1336]

There were aboriginal rock art done before the native Americans came to north America which were done by the ancient Australian aboriginal people

[@Yalloak939]

Which flight was that to LAX?

[@ragnari9368]

No one ever wants to talk about the possibility that the People we call Native Americans, were not the First Human inhabitants of the Americas, and they may have replaced, assimilated, or annihilated the original settlers.

[@puidemare2337]

Doesn't fit the desired narrative. Whatever that is. The reality of the matter is that it's all speculation

[@thechildfromthevillage]

You’re talking about the Clovis. Clovis were most likely related to denisovan and denisovan DNA you find in the Americas and Asia. Aboriginals are related to Asians and Polynesians. I actually believe the opposite. I believe they have been annihilated today and are being assimilated. I believe these groups come from the same and we’re the dominant human on this earth and through colonization have been severely erased. If you look at the world Europe and Africa have been wayyy less mixed than those other places in the last couple hundred years me myself I have 15 Ethnicities. And some Asians ethnicities are really a mix of groups in that region. That’s why I’m these places you find such a huge range of features and colors. Even people who are 100% of specific Asian ethnicities don’t look the same and have various features. I feel like most people looked aboriginal, South East Asian or native. Those groups have things that connect them genetically and they have similar features

[@thechildfromthevillage]

Even when we’re are mixed in modern day we look similar. Their are aboriginals that could blend in Latina America and south East Asians as well. I’m not saying I’m right. But that’s interesting you’ve gotta admit

[@thechildfromthevillage]

Easy example an indigenous Peruvian

[@Kalmar917]

The Olmecs mixed with pre-Incan and pre-Aztec and pre-Mayan natives. They are now finding those traits in todays DNA. A lot of them aboriginal dna is being found in Native American of both North and South. They either crossed on ice and not through barring strait or sailed.

[@MelaniaRose]

It’s very interesting. In fact a lot of the cultural similarities between Native American and Aboriginal people are amazing

[@jking4609]

@@MelaniaRose does this mean native Americans are black. Or not their own race

[@paulfri1569]

They look very much like Australian Aboriginal peoples..

[@Kalmar917]

@@jking4609 Nope.

[@frjedi9081]

Asians come from Africa. African went to Europe, Asia, South Asia and Oceania, including Australia. But it was a long process by waves. In the same time, Africans became Asians and crossed the Bering channel, some stayed in North America, others went down to the South. Because of ice age, those from the North migrated to the south, then other came back. Other asian people went back to Europe and some « European » went to Asia. The reason why arborigen of Australia have DNA matching with South American natives is because they have the same ancestors (Africans => Europe and Middle East => Asia => North America or South Asia. Then from North America to South America and from South East Asia to Oceania and finally Australia and New Zeland. Crossing from South Asia to Australia and New Zeland was easy while the ice age (no more than a daily trip from an island to another. So they could make it being numerous. It never has been the case between Australia and South America. Islands are not so close. That’s the same for animals. Australian animals are quite different. It’s also the case for Madagascar animals. A sweet potato could cross an ocean, not a human nor a Kangaroo.

[@rockinbobokkin7831]

Follow the coasts then migrate up the rivers. The first crossing couldn't be a foot crossing. My bet is skin boats hunting coastal sea mammals, salmon, and sea birds, shore nesting birds. The life would be relatively simple, and probably highly mobile. Probably setting up permanent camps at river mouths and bays that provide easy fishing. Descendents would slowly migrate upriver and adapt to more terrestrial hunting. At some point, probably at the Levant, there was a population bottleneck of h sapiens.

[@dgr8flav]

Yes, they sailed. The same way they made it to Australia and Oceania.

[@georgemartinwilliams2980]

THIS IS VERY INTERESTING!

[@bossdog1480]

It's my contention that Australian Aboriginals share a remarkable likeness to Sri Lankan natives. There's a Japanese made documentary about a tribe in Sri Lanka. These people look like AA, there language sounds very similar and their fish trapping techniques that were shown in the doco are almost identical to the AA.

[@timothyxosullivan]

Agreed, I have thought that the Australian aborigines resembled some of the Tamils in southern India

[@Automedon2]

Have they tested AA against African DNA? How about the DNA of the Sentinelese of the Andaman Islands? If there is common DNA, the migration from Africa would be the most interesting of them all.

[@bossdog1480]

@@Automedon2 Don't know the answer to that. It would be interesting to know.

[@StickyKeys187]

Not just Sri Lanka, but the whole of South India and some parts of what used to be the site of the ancient Indus Valley Civilization in present-day Pakistan. In fact, there is evidence that the language of the Indus Valley Civilization is what formed the basis for Proto-Dravidian languages, which includes present-day languages such as Telugu, Tamil, amongst others. Their DNA belongs to what they call AASI (Ancient Ancestral South Indian). The India now is vastly different from the India then, when the Indus Valley Civilization was thriving, before the modern-day Indo-Aryan people arrived and now constitute the majority of the population of India.

[@bucktooth002]

Adam & Eve came from Sri Lanka.

[@medit8iv_native970]

Not aboriginal its australoid, we're from sundaland/sulawesi area

[@StickyKeys187]

And where did they come from before that? That's right, Mama Africa.

[@medit8iv_native970]

@@StickyKeys187 yea from the mauri, West Africa. But its not like they have any recollection of our relationship

[@StickyKeys187]

@@medit8iv_native970 Remember that the Africa now wasn't the Africa then. There were many civilizations and groups of people on the second most largest continent on Earth. Africa is the true birthplace of your ancestors.

[@medit8iv_native970]

@@StickyKeys187 we already know that and pay homage, hence why we are called Māori, and we come from mauri. They taught the culture but we m received the new knowledge from creator, not the ancestor, hence why we occupied everywhere out of Africa.

[@medit8iv_native970]

@Terry Fox was a victim of Genocide nope, you have an oversimplified version, haplogroup c were the people to leave first, hence first nations lol damn how old are you

[@AuthenticDarren]

Considerings Polynesians are known to have visited and colonised most of the Islands in the Pacific worth colonising, I don't think it's beyond reasonable to propose they reached the coasts of South America and left a few of their number behind and Polynesia isn't far from Melanesia.

[@MelaniaRose]

True. A lot of cultural similarities between Native Americans and Polynesians.

[@machismo4256]

Back in the Day I spent 3 months in India. There are many many people there who are the spitting image of full blood Australian aboriginals.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

true

[@tomorrow.]

Yup! Australoid is one of the races of Southern Indian states.

[@matthewmann8969]

Amerindians were the first arrivals in The Americas while Eskimos, Aleuts, Native Oceanians, Europeans, and others came as late fielders and basers yeah.

[@JonDoeNeace]

Amerindians were First but the Melanesian related DNA comes from the same time period and was admixed in small groups since day one. So there's no distinction there. The Inuit/Aleut are the second wave of pre historic migrants, after Amerindians, and Austronesians are the first visitor, the ones who didn't colonize, and the only one Amerindians left the continent for.

[@JonDoeNeace]

Amerindian is first, then, Inuit/Aleut. Then the Austronesians, who were the first to mingle with Amerindians and leave descendants, and yet did not colonize the continent. The Scandinavians fought with the Inuit but never crossed with Amerindian groups.

[@LindaSt-JeanPaquette]

Why not listen to the natives stories of their origins…..´educated people, researchers’ always seem so surprised when , after all their testings and researches, to come to conclusions the ancients of the native societies have known all the time

[@chuckokelley2448]

White Sands New Mexico Human Footprints 23,000 to 28,000 years old

[@MysteriousOrigins1]

Yep

[@frederickaustral6720]

I'm Australian aboriginal half native Indian 👍

[@frankedgar6694]

New thought for me. Off the coast of England, settlements are found that existed when sea levels were substantially lower. Given that fact, how many islands that no longer visible, had settlements gnat would have lead to sea going vessels being able to migrate from island to island and reach both North America AND South America. Is the Pacific sea flour shallow enough in enough places to allow for that?

[@Alexandria.Washington]

This evidence shows that Black Americans are Indigenous to both South and North America. We did not arrive from Africa on some made up story about slaves ships. Yes, some Africans were brought here (very few to North America) for slavery, but most Indigenous Black Americans were already here and are still here today….just ask Virginia, and North and South Carolina about their paper genocide which reclassified Indigenous Black Americans from Indian to Mulatto to Black to African American. There were four groups of people living in North America during early colonialism including Whites, Native Americans(Mongolian), Indigenous tribes(Blacks), and Africans. Indigenous Black Americans (Copper-Colored) are not the same as African. We have the same DNA of the Indigenous Australian tribes. White American and Native Americans don’t want this information to go public because of money and land owed to Black Indigenous Americans. Just research Luzia in South America, our ancestor.

[@johnbooth1110]

National Museum Mexico professor Rodreigus 1990 , Evidence found in the lakes of Mexico that may indicate a peoples from Australia . based on DNA research .

[@conniead5206]

A very small sampling. While it proves people with heritage from Oceana are among the indigenous, it doesn’t prove their theories of how it got there. Or when. Oldest sample is under 15,000 years ago. There are a few sites in North and South America that are currently dated over 20,000 years old. One in Chili dated 21,000 years old. Unfortunately a skull dated about 30,000 years old was destroyed when the Brazilian museum it was in went up in flames sometime in the last decade. I do not know if they tried to get DNA from it before that. If I remember correctly they name it “Lucia”. I tend to root for the idea that people from Oceana got to the Americas by a more direct route. Maybe not before 15,000 years ago, but that doesn’t really matter. If they can theorize that a sweet potato from the Americas could survive floating in salt water for months to get to Oceana, why couldn’t people who got as far as Easter Island and New Zealand get to South America. Then there are the Olmec heads. They look exactly like various ethnicities in Oceana.

[@briancole7024]

Olmec heads look like Olmec and Mayan people.

[@vijaynarsamma2291]

Australian aboriginal people have history of oral storytelling of before the Great barrier reef was formed. Remains have been dated over tens of thousands of years old.

[@chriswhite3692]

Didn't on of the really old Chile ones have Norwegian DNA? I know it's a weird outlier and not sure how that got *There*, but makes me think there was a small colony there.

[@briafx]

The olmec heads looks like the people who built them and its not who you guys are talking about!!

[@totwallybaba]

Excellent content! Excellent presentation! Excellent channel!

[@MysteriousOrigins1]

Thank you very much!

[@25oxendine]

@@MysteriousOrigins1 Similar info came out about eight years ago. It was allegedly debunked, yet here we are again. Great video

[@lloydwegener3956]

Excellent channell for fairy stories and half truths this channell has nothing to do with science

[@oscargranda5385]

Como lo describe el libro de urantia!!!!🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@bigsilverorb3492]

I don't understand why a Pacific sea-crossing seems so implausible for so many. Given the amount of sea travel going on as Southeast Asia and Australia were being populated, I'd frankly be surprised if a group of migrants *hadn't* got lost and somehow survived all the way to South America. Thousands of years seems plenty long for at least several "accidents" like this to occur, and this doesn't even consider intentional attempts at crossing.

[@billkallas1762]

I'm sure that a few dozen made it out of the thousands that got lost and drifted here. Their DNA would be so deluded by now, we will never know.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

The currents and winds go against a direct passage from Asia to the Americas. Going the other way is much more likely. Also going round the top of the Pacific is highly likely, both boating and walking. I'm not saying impossible...

[@bigsilverorb3492]

@@nmarbletoe8210 It seems reasonable that the currents could have been different with lower sea levels and presumably more land mass in the Pacific. Quick search didn't turn up substantive study of ancient currents combined with land mass exposure, perhaps a deeper search would.

[@mishham6388]

The Maori and pacific Islanders have a plant the sweet potato which is native to south America and they also share south American DNA so they obviously travelled there to get the plant. They have oral stories about it if u look hard enough

[@ГеоргиКолев-ш3я]

On top of that, there are those ancient south American chicken breeds like Araucanas that lay blue-ish eggs. Chickens come from Asia. Chicken bones were found in South America but non in North America long before Columbus (obviously they didn't fly there from Asia)

[@mishham6388]

@@ГеоргиКолев-ш3я didn't know that but that's amazing !!

[@willyhuanca7541]

There already is proved that the Incas conquered Oceania

[@paperboy...8667]

Monica an skeletons in the Cupboard, take a look at that you won't be disappointed

[@bitchcraftwitch351]

This theory suggests that Austronesian people were the first to migrate to the Americas due to their maritime aptitude and ability to make long sea voyages. Remnants of this theory still exist today, such as the traditional Polynesian tattoo designs which have been found among some Native American tribes. In addition, there are also similarities in terms of material culture, such as pottery styles and ceremonial activities. Furthermore, further genetic research has also supported a link between Austronesian and Native American populations. It has been found that both have a significant frequency of Haplogroup C1, a genetic marker found in a significant number of Asian peoples. This evidence has suggested that both populations share common gene pools and could have maintained a relationship for centuries. In conclusion, there is strong evidence to suggest that Native Americans and Austronesians have a deep-rooted relationship with one another. Through genetic and archaeological research, it has been found that both people groups share similar origins, material culture, and genetic markers. This suggests that they have not only been related in the past but also maintained contact over a vast period of time.

[@WarAndFame]

I remember reading something about the sweet potato in south america comng from melanesians, and their word for it also being in south america pre european

[@AdllerEsmeralda1]

My understanding by Incas historians … they were travelling to others worlds.. they gifted and share knowledge. With the polynesians

[@bitchcraftwitch351]

@@AdllerEsmeralda1 This theory suggests that Austronesian people were the first to migrate to the Americas due to their maritime aptitude and ability to make long sea voyages. Remnants of this theory still exist today, such as the traditional Polynesian tattoo designs which have been found among some Native American tribes. In addition, there are also similarities in terms of material culture, such as pottery styles and ceremonial activities. Furthermore, further genetic research has also supported a link between Austronesian and Native American populations. It has been found that both have a significant frequency of Haplogroup C1, a genetic marker found in a significant number of Asian peoples. This evidence has suggested that both populations share common gene pools and could have maintained a relationship for centuries. In conclusion, there is strong evidence to suggest that Native Americans and Austronesians have a deep-rooted relationship with one another. Through genetic and archaeological research, it has been found that both people groups share similar origins, material culture, and genetic markers. This suggests that they have not only been related in the past but also maintained contact over a vast period of time.

[@torichan9872]

@@bitchcraftwitch351 To add to this, I've found Maori like myself recieve Indigenous American as trace DNA on 23andMe. Not all Maori do, but most of us recieve it within the range of 0.1- 0.8%. Of course DNA testing isn't totally accurate but it's a result I found very interesting when I recieved my results

[@tlamatini4617]

Potato’s originated from the Americas.

[@kubbybear5458]

@@tlamatini4617 white potatoes, yes, but I also recall coming across info that sweet potatoes came from the pacific, and were the original thing that had the name "potato" or something very close to that in various languages of different places. When Europeans came on the scene and brought these two things (sweet & white) to Europe, they called both potatoes and eventually started calling one of them "sweet potatoes" and the other "white potatoes" to differentiate/identify them. The white potatoes got shortened to being called just potatoes while the other kept the sweet prefix on its moniker

[@auntoneyofuntease6704]

Does it really matter where we came from? It matters more of where we're at and going. I'm Cree and Chicano. I dance at pow wow and have a culture most people don't know anything about. Most real natives don't bother with scientific studies. We have our culture and customs that we want to pass on to future generations.

[@puidemare2337]

Right!?! As if "scientific" studies are what legitimizes something. I'm part Hawaiian/Chinese and through my Hawaiian side we have our own way of passing 'ike (knowledge) from one generation to the next.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@Mitchell Welsh I'm European (Jewish, Viking, Irish, Scottish, English) and I think one reason we are so interested in scientific traces of history is that we lost our own tribal histories in the middle ages. Our traditions were erased and our shamans persecuted. So we resort to science to tell us about our deep history.

[@ausgepicht]

This begs the question: what sort of archaeological sites are in the submerged "Berengia," and is anyone doing work there? I'm just thinking about what riches the Doggerland sites have brought us. So many sites that would teach us an immense about humanity is submerged under waves. I know people think rising sea levels is a new thing and caused by climate change, but the sea levels around the world rose waaaaaaay before modern humanity, as part of the natural ebb and flow of ice ages and interglacial "seasons." And how about that black and white image of the 4 adults and two kids with bows wearing a fur shawl and fur shoes, but nothing on their lower legs in what had to be negative temperatures. Here in New England we have their clothing "descendants": that one guy who wears a hoodie and shorts all winter. lol

[@canecorso8251]

They were the Selknam from Patagonia and often wore less.

[@bucktooth002]

We just have a higher body temperature. Legs do not get cold.

[@davidbenner2289]

These Polynesian, Austronesian and Melanesian People traveled thousands of miles in open sea going outriggers. Easter Island was inhabited. Could they not have traveled from the Western Pacific over the ocean? Gone up and over the Andies Mountains and or around the tip of South America?

[@bucktooth002]

You could go from Pakistan to Russia in a straight line & land in Russia in 83 days or do the same from India & land in the United States.

[@leoscalzi296]

Our true story would blow too many minds! We have shared/survived on this rock for millions of years, catastrophies happen more often than we can comprehend. Species with amnesia

[@dgr8flav]

They didn't walk on the Bering Straits. They rowed and they sailed. Population dispersal is faster by boat than by land. Why are these people still insisting on the walking theory?

[@bitchcraftwitch351]

It’s honestly both

[@matong74crow68]

I am bloodline Lakota Sioux born in Australia my grandfather was posted in Cairns for the Pacific conflict with Canadian paratrooper regiment.

[@wakinyanluta7720]

Lakota came out of Wind Cave , there was no migration

[@laetitiavisagie2632]

Reseachers never panic...they are sometimes surprised

[@matong74crow68]

The current term in your study relating to archaic ancestry north south America and melanisions connection to ' AUSSIE NATIVES ' - the term for aboriginal people today is " FIRST NATIONS PEOPLE "

[@LarryHatch]

Is anyone annoyed or bothered by the fact we are called Homo sapiens when in fact many of us have some Homo neanderthalensis genes? That means were are actually a hybrid species, interspecific between two distinct species. If a species has more than 0.5% of another species, it is not pure and considered a hybrid. I've seen the name Homo x neadersapiens but I don't know if that's scientifically valid and published. Any ideas? (I'm a botanical taxonomist and so very interested in hybrid speciation).

[@MysteriousOrigins1]

Interesting that plant taxonomy is based on physical characteristics like seed shape but genetic studies of plants show very different taxonomy

[@LarryP248]

This piece is incredibly insightful. Reading a book with parallel content was a defining experience for me. "Temporal Echoes: Amelia's Odyssey Through Ancestral Shadows" by Vivian Rosewood

[@TheMedicineShell]

This makes sense. If look at the aesthetic styles of Aztec dress and culture, it looks closer to what you also see in Papua New Guiena today than Siberia etc.

[@rustydogrustydog9191]

That’s a ridiculous stretch. The Austronesian theory is baloney. The minuscule dna marker was found in South America not central or North America. And it was again minuscule. The majority dna markers still are Eurasian/ Siberian.

[@TheMedicineShell]

@@rustydogrustydog9191 calm down bro

[@rustydogrustydog9191]

@@TheMedicineShell Obviously my response triggered you. Maybe next time you actually do some research before you speak absurdities about something you know nothing about.

[@TheMedicineShell]

@@rustydogrustydog9191 you're like this on Christmas? Lol relax

[@rustydogrustydog9191]

@@TheMedicineShell 😂yeah I know kinda pathetic 😂but it’s a hobby of mine so what can I say. Cheers and peace🍺

[@johnmaccallum7935]

Wouldn't it make sense to have these AM genes in current or archaic populations in Siberia and East Asia before claiming this is where indigenous Americans originated from? Well they're not so this claim hasn't a leg to stand on and I'm yet to see any human remains from Beringea. in fact it may as well be Atlantis.

[@MM-yl9gn]

Because it was out of America!

[@thomasmoore5949]

Isn’t the reason there are so few human remains from Beringia because Beringia is largely under a very angry arctic sea now?

[@MM-yl9gn]

@@thomasmoore5949 they would find these signatures in ancient North American remains if it were carried over from Beringia but the fact that it is South of Central America indicates genetic exhange across the Pacific.

[@johnmaccallum7935]

@@thomasmoore5949 Alaska would have been part of Beringia and the oldest remains from there are only 11,000 yrs while in New Mexico 36.000 etc. Think about it.

[@johnmaccallum7935]

A Beringea source is a logical assumption yet there's zero evidence to back it up.

[@leehasamsg2174]

Logic would dedicated the earth landmass wasnt as it is when human migrated, that south america, india, australia and west africa were joined when humans migrated, and that landmass seperated with human pops already on them

[@COD-MIIR.]

1:07 Through.UNCR, Or Taxes border.

[@jonnyjonny2926]

Researchers were "left in a panic" why? Because results are strange or unusual? This is real science, dealing with whatever the data shows you. Not being afraid of ridicule or attacks from sociopaths in the scientific community only interested in protecting the status quo rather doing real science .

[@nmarbletoe8210]

Are they though? What is the evidence that even one researcher had a single moment of mild concern.

[@chrisdavis7617]

Do you all have any Mound Builder DNA to compare to anything? Seems like you are talking modern indigenous. What about the 45,000 year old find in South America in the last year.

[@Rayzajw]

I think it's silly to think the only way these people settled america is the the land bridge. Some people think the Pacific and Atlantic oceans are some sort of wall. Just because Europeans came in the ships with sails does not rule out boats reaching the americas

[@nmarbletoe8210]

The kelp highway is a very popular hypothesis these days

[@JonDoeNeace]

99% of Amerindian DNA has no Australian trace.

[@JonDoeNeace]

It's a genetic isolate in the interior Amazon. Not the standard Amerindian.

[@paulfri1569]

The ancient Austroloids are the original inhabitants of most of East Asia also before the Mongoloids wiped them out..

[@MelaniaRose]

They weren’t wiped out but interbred. Genetic studies show this.

[@serg10st]

Everything is Everything!

[@paulfri1569]

Because Native Americans come also from the central Pacific via the Pacific islands.. It's quite obvious..

[@MAGIKMARTIAN9526]

im sure you would need more than 3 ancient dna samples to get a good base, i person from each area will not give accurate base to start, MAINLY you dont know if the dna in samples are standard for region or an anomoly ,

[@kilipaki87oritahiti]

Because they are not 1st nation/indigenous to the Americas, but migrated from the Philippines…

[@elimuwinn9279]

There is a old wise tail that the Native American Pict Kings who conquered Europe put them there as an experiment to see if they would breed with the british colonies... That may have been done by the later Royals during the slave trade. you should look in the philippines isles too.

[@michaelashley2855]

Wise tail ?

[@Csdabest89]

The Pre-Columbus Natives were a combination of multiple migrations. The eldest being negro/african.

[@sahulianhooligan7046]

All humans are Africans, African is meaningless in this context

[@georgesheffield1580]

Thor Hirdahl showed this to be the case back in the 50's

[@forestshomer4043]

"Scientists" are not a monolith--as seems to be implied here. And the obvious question: where is the direct input in compiling this theoretical study, of the native peoples themselves? For example, I didn't detect in this vid that exploration by coastal navigation was part of the data or maybe even considered; yet in the oral history of coastal Alaskan people of today transmitted directly to me, their ancestors came around the North Pacific Rim by water--not by a land bridge. And after discovering the emerging Southeast Alaska coastline, continued all the way to Tierra del Fuego---possibly in one voyage of discovery in one year or two, before returning to Alaska which they found to the "the best place." (direct quote from my native elder) That would be not unlike the voyages of discovery of mariners like Magellan and Cook. The main obstacle to considering this, is the cultural bias of 'scientific' researchers who fail to consider the accuracy and validity of oral histories--carefully nurtured across scores of generations by the people who inhabit the 'Americas.'

[@williamhague2768]

What makes you think it’s not the native Americans didn’t bounce the aboriginal ‘others’ out of America!! I’m guessing that your guessing… is deficient…

[@leostgeorge2080]

1-2% heritage is very low. We share i higher % with Neanderthal and Denisovans. Up to 3-4% from a more distant time. Looking at a native N American it is clear they are of Asian descent. Their size implying, They mixed with another race after they arrived. As for S Americans. It does appear a different peoples. How ever not nearly as dark skinned as Aborigen's. Perhaps also mixing with an already established population. At times the "science" of a few specimens can cloud apparent logic already looking you in the face. Literally.

[@indiopeltier9758]

Us Indigenous are all connected

[@woodygilson3465]

Technically, there's no such thing. All humans are descendants of migrants. No one group of people has lived anywhere for forever. Modern genomics and ancient DNA show we're all related when you go far enough down the line. Not just with other humans. We're also genetically related to every living thing. Elementally, we're physically related to every non-living thing, here and across the universe. Rather than celebrate these extraordinary ties, and move into the future together, too many people are still pissing on dirt to mark territory, romanticizing primitivity, and periodically dragging the rest of us back to the stone ages in the name of "preserving culture." Time doesn't preserve cultures. There's no such thing as a pure race, nor could there ever be. One doesn't have to look too hard to see that humanity is eons older than its oldest gods, older than its oldest living traditions. In that time, we've moved around, fucked around, invented gods whose memories are now lost to time, lived in communities long forgotten, and still we think the world began with us.

[@ai.culturalquotes888]

My understanding from DNA research done by a Demark Scientist the Aborigines' was the first known people to leave Africa and live in isolation in Australian for 60,000-70,000 years. Then the rest followed thousands of years later.

[@xenosayork2265]

That work was later disproven after DNA testing improved. All non-africans today are descendants from the same group that left Africa about 60,000 years ago.

[@ericsonhazeltine5064]

This point is scientifically nonsense

[@jfkfitirjdjjsisieirirjfjdj5967]

it probably isn’t 100% factual but I think it’s on the right track anyway,because a lot of Indian and Egyptian artefacts have been found in Australia that are very old and weathered,I’m certain we will find more evidence of a ancient international relationship between all native peoples,a lot of evidence was actually destroyed in early 1800s in Australia and probably all around the world,a lot of stuff was looted and sent to places like Italy,Britain and and a few others have our artefacts,I have learned many native peoples used to come and go looking for sacred knowledge in Australia,some tribes ere did actually give our woman as a gift to our visitors,maybe that’s how our dna ended up around the world 👍🏾

[@MelaniaRose]

Why ? Genetics don’t lie. Aboriginal Australians dna is all over the world and that’s a coincidence?

[@JonDoeNeace]

​@@MelaniaRoseexactly. Genetics don't lie. There is no Melanesian related DNA in Amerindian DNA outside of interior Amazonian isolates.

[@JonDoeNeace]

​​​@@MelaniaRoseAll it means is that one or two founding Amerindians from Beringian migration had a common ancestor to an Australian and was genetically isolated in the rainforest all this time 😂 That's what the genetics shows. You're right. It doesn't lie.

[@JonDoeNeace]

​​​@@MelaniaRose"Genetics don't lie." Exactly. 😂 99.99% of Amerindian groups have 0% Australian DNA. It's only found in genetically isolated groups in the interior Amazon. That's all.

[@user-wy4mp9ts3u]

In Japan there is an remnant of native aboriginal people that are very similar to native Australian aboriginal

[@christophereckermann1838]

Yes, they are our brother and sisters as well.

[@lynettebaxter2101]

My mother fit's that description. Aboriginal.....mistaken for Asian all the time.

[@vajeye-nar6172]

No there isn't

[@ComaToast1]

@@vajeye-nar6172 don’t just say provide proof I know that the Ainu people of Japan share similar cultures and beliefs with Australian aboriginals for example they both believe in the rainbow serpent

[@Cove-o4d]

I believe this was part of Haplogroup C. The native Australian group branch off from the group heading to Beringia around the Java area. The ones who reached America became Haplogroup C3.

[@janettedavis6627]

The Timorese are of Portuguese origin Timore is very close to Australia and it is known the Portuguese definitely were in Australia too. My opinion only many of these peoples are of Portuguese origin. Portuguese and Spanish discovered much of the world.

[@HebrewHammerArmsCo]

Elizabeth Warren is an Aussie

[@jmseipp]

It’s thought that they traveled from Siberia and down the West Coast in Oceangoing Canoes rather that walking across the land bridge since of was covered in ice and Glaciers.

[@simwallace8262]

CARAL...CIVILIZATION 370 km Northern from Lima,Peru

[@nativestacker4185]

Why is it that someone is always trying to say they know where Native Americans came from ? Some say , they came during the last Ice Age , yet there is evidence of people here for more than 130,000 years . MAYBE , some Native Americans stretched out and left North America during the last Ice Age , There has been evidence of Native American weapons found on the western end of what would have been The Crossing during the Ice Age , MAYBE , The Native Americans were the explorers . Think about that .

[@MelaniaRose]

I think it’s because the history is very complex.

[@karlbekker777]

I would advise Genisis 1:1 with Dr Ken Ham and Dr Nathaniel. So much great information thats honest and many, many, many hours of backed up and research that has gone into making them the lead credibility in human movement over the ages....this is just copy and paste

[@ernestod.gonzalez2967]

Altai Mountains is our homeland....all Native Americans came fron Altai Mountains....